Again, how did they misled the readers? NYTimes underestimated the number of suckers in the US, but this is not "misleading people". They were not reporting false news or outright lies, like some other pro-Trump media.
And STFU with the "endorsement" crap. The media was absolutely on witch hunt season for Hillary while Trump got a pass. Her every minor misstep was reported out of proportion. That "deplorable" slip? Trump uttered pretty much the same crap at every other rally.
Now, I think this was to show readers that the media was "equally tough on everybody" since not many people really believed that Trump is going to win.
How had NY Times misled readers? How? They reported everything fairly and honestly. They honestly say that Trump is a fucking nutty idiot.
It's just that tons of media in the US are trying to do "both sides are equal" BS thus making people think that there are no right or wrong viewpoints. This leads all the way up: "Views on the shape of the Earth differ, now let's hear what our esteemed Flat Earth Party member has to say".
I played with it at the time. It was awkward and slow - there was just 1Gb of RAM and 3D acceleration didn't work with X11. IO was also painfully slow.
Samsung S8 has 4Gb RAM and a far faster CPU and storage. It's still on a low end for desktops, but it's at least starting to look feasible.
Why would you steal something that has no value for you? For example, the US is rapidly losing expertise required to build nuclear reactors while China is gaining it. The same for high-speed rail.
The US still has several tricks up its sleeves: biotech and pharma research, R&D for computer software and hardware, airspace and so on. But at this point China probably is not worried that these areas give the US a crippling advantage over China.
Actually, they were successful in keeping women from government, executive positions, law and medicine. They all still have bias. The kicker is, the bias has improved compared with a situation even 30 years ago.
T-Mobile is not going anywhere. They already have a really nice network in most cities, they lack coverage in rural areas and in some markets but they still show a healthy growth.
The runaway effect needs something like 3000ppm of CO2. This is not going to happen. What you need to fear is the sea level rise, desertification, extreme weather and your neighbors who will gladly kill you once they have nothing to eat.
A CEO of a multi-billion corporation who actually tries to keep up with his technology down to the nitty gritty details. No wonder RedHat is going well!
Or at least they need to start being actual news feeds. Only showing you stuff you asked to see - or at least, if it must include ads, clearly labeling them as ads.
Nope. "The stuff you asked to see" is THE problem with the social media. You just become insulated in your bubble and it just keeps being reinforced. The old time news used to include all kinds of opinions.
Technically, reprocessing is not a rate limiting step in nuclear power generation. There's more than enough natural uranium for the current world's needs.
And with these unprotected blades rotating at high speed they can also perform beheadings on the fly! Sounds like it's a great feature for Dubai police.
China is building 22 new reactors under construction right now. And by 2020 they're planning to double their construction rate. Meanwhile, US has lost key expertise needed to build nuclear power plants and Europe is well on the way to do the same.
China's electricity output right now is: Coal - 58%, Hydro - 20%, Wind+Solar - 15%, Nuclear - 2%. Coal generation is capped at 1GW (its 950GW now) and will probably start to fall down soon.
He hadn't said it, but he did imply it. And that there should be affirmative action for conservative views, because they are underrepresented.
Oh, and if you look at his later twitter posts that show that he's totally enamored with KKK, you can clearly understand why he was fired. He's an asshole.
Slashdot Mirror
So this clown now pretends to be a minority and demands to be treated specially?
Fuck him. He already has shown that he's a simple racist, confirmed by his association with the fucking Klan.
Again, how did they misled the readers? NYTimes underestimated the number of suckers in the US, but this is not "misleading people". They were not reporting false news or outright lies, like some other pro-Trump media.
And STFU with the "endorsement" crap. The media was absolutely on witch hunt season for Hillary while Trump got a pass. Her every minor misstep was reported out of proportion. That "deplorable" slip? Trump uttered pretty much the same crap at every other rally.
Now, I think this was to show readers that the media was "equally tough on everybody" since not many people really believed that Trump is going to win.
So what? Hitler said a lot of things that make sense. For example, he was against smoking and made several anti-smoking speeches.
As pretty much any other dictator. It's quite easy to cut Hitler speeches to support right-wingers as well. I can even do it with Lenin's speeches.
How had NY Times misled readers? How? They reported everything fairly and honestly. They honestly say that Trump is a fucking nutty idiot.
It's just that tons of media in the US are trying to do "both sides are equal" BS thus making people think that there are no right or wrong viewpoints. This leads all the way up: "Views on the shape of the Earth differ, now let's hear what our esteemed Flat Earth Party member has to say".
How to tell that a conservative is lying? His lips are moving! Here’s the list of papers endorsing Trump: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wik...
Against Trump? Really? The whole campaign was basically a witch hunt season on Hillary and “whatever you say Mr. Trump”.
I played with it at the time. It was awkward and slow - there was just 1Gb of RAM and 3D acceleration didn't work with X11. IO was also painfully slow.
Samsung S8 has 4Gb RAM and a far faster CPU and storage. It's still on a low end for desktops, but it's at least starting to look feasible.
Why would you steal something that has no value for you? For example, the US is rapidly losing expertise required to build nuclear reactors while China is gaining it. The same for high-speed rail.
The US still has several tricks up its sleeves: biotech and pharma research, R&D for computer software and hardware, airspace and so on. But at this point China probably is not worried that these areas give the US a crippling advantage over China.
Duh. The Republican healthcare plan is: "Die fast". So it totally fits.
"Hey, judge, I spotted a perv in that house watching kiddie porn through windows, can I get a warrant?"
If a fucking FBI wants to put you under surveillance then they totally can do it.
This works up to a point. If your packages get stolen too often then Amazon will require a signature upon delivery.
They can already do this with regular locks. Duh.
Actually, they were successful in keeping women from government, executive positions, law and medicine. They all still have bias. The kicker is, the bias has improved compared with a situation even 30 years ago.
T-Mobile is not going anywhere. They already have a really nice network in most cities, they lack coverage in rural areas and in some markets but they still show a healthy growth.
The runaway effect needs something like 3000ppm of CO2. This is not going to happen. What you need to fear is the sea level rise, desertification, extreme weather and your neighbors who will gladly kill you once they have nothing to eat.
A CEO of a multi-billion corporation who actually tries to keep up with his technology down to the nitty gritty details. No wonder RedHat is going well!
Or at least they need to start being actual news feeds. Only showing you stuff you asked to see - or at least, if it must include ads, clearly labeling them as ads.
Nope. "The stuff you asked to see" is THE problem with the social media. You just become insulated in your bubble and it just keeps being reinforced. The old time news used to include all kinds of opinions.
Technically, reprocessing is not a rate limiting step in nuclear power generation. There's more than enough natural uranium for the current world's needs.
So they violated the law only a little, right? And definitely are not violating it now?
"I love it!" - Kushner.https://yro.slashdot.org/story/17/10/24/206213/congress-opens-probe-into-fbis-handling-of-clinton-email-investigation#
And with these unprotected blades rotating at high speed they can also perform beheadings on the fly! Sounds like it's a great feature for Dubai police.
So when are we getting a touchbar-less MBP?
China has a LOT of coal, yet they're moving away from it.
China is building 22 new reactors under construction right now. And by 2020 they're planning to double their construction rate. Meanwhile, US has lost key expertise needed to build nuclear power plants and Europe is well on the way to do the same.
Can you at least quote the correct numbers?
China's electricity output right now is: Coal - 58%, Hydro - 20%, Wind+Solar - 15%, Nuclear - 2%. Coal generation is capped at 1GW (its 950GW now) and will probably start to fall down soon.
He hadn't said it, but he did imply it. And that there should be affirmative action for conservative views, because they are underrepresented.
Oh, and if you look at his later twitter posts that show that he's totally enamored with KKK, you can clearly understand why he was fired. He's an asshole.