There's nothing complex about it, you can create more powerful thermite mixes with additional oxidizers (like potassium permanganate or potassium nitrate). They are described in a lot of chemical literature, there's nothing secret in it.
Of course, all this stuff is incredibly dangerous - it can burn through almost ANYTHING.
One word that is shown to you is always known. The second one is unknown. In your case, you entered the known word correctly.
As anti-bot measure, reCAPTCHA starts showing pictures with BOTH known words if you (anyone with your IP) incorrectly guess two words in one hour, AFAIR.
I don't know. I think the best reason to use FreeBSD now is habit. And there's a huge number of working FreeBSD systems, so people just gradually upgrade them - no sense to fix something when it is not broken...
The other reasons are not very convincing. Personally, I like GNU userland better ("screen" - I love you!), for example. Glibc may not nice, but it works fine (I only looked at its sources when I needed to build a cross-platform toolchain).
No, helium is getting expensive because government stopped subsidizing it.
There's a lot of helium in natural gas, but gas companies did not even bother extracting it. With the rising helium prices they are already looking into helium extraction.
I went on a several trips with climate scientists while I was in a university. I distinctly remember that meteo balloons were not that easy to pop.
And they also don't cost much. For example, I found this price: http://him-wettershop.com/ENG_276_EUR_0_722__.html - 11 euro for a balloon is quite OK. It should be even less if you buy them in quantity.
Helium is expensive, but there are VAST quantities of it. In any case, balloons do not require much of it.
Also, balloons will fly over the clouds, so they can use solar power during the day.
And I imagine that it's possible to create balloons with more lift.
We used EAP-TLS with RADIUS (last time I checked they even started to use smartcards) in the 'secured' perimter and everything worked with the built-in Windows wireless.
The outside VPN client required stupid Intel VPN, which is very annoying and not very stable.
The _intent_ of GPL is perfectly clear, it's written in plain English in the preamble. Literal meaning is also crystal clear.
Now, _technical_ _details_ of GPL enforcement, of course, won't be the same in all jurisdictions. For example, GPL technically was not enforceable in Russia a year ago.
But you don't NEED to know all technical details of GPL to understand most of GPL consequences. And you also can read nice FAQs on GPL from the FSF.
It turned out that it's easier to work without active VPN connection using only built-in Windows wireless. Besides, we have some additional security on VPN.
Get the token at the manufacturing plant that makes the things, or someplace in the supply train. Compromise an individual who has authorized access to the inside of the building.
Tokens are useless until they are initialized. It's possible to compromise individual who has authorized access, but it's much harder. You probably won't be doing it unless you need to steal something VERY important.
Your example with Tony Blair is a bad one - there was no security breach, it was that just low-level security did not know the true situation.
In the last company I worked, we had TWO wireless networks. One worked for anyone with only minimal authorization (WEP key pasted on the wall) and it didn't have access to the corporate internal network.
The second one had strong WPA encryption with heavy logging and intrusion control.
Yes, that's about right. Human brain contains about 1.5kg of brain matter (and it's estimated that around 700g is necessary for high-order brain functions), and mouse brain contains about 1g.
I have made the same estimation personally few years ago:)
What use is SOM then? You can write D-BUS services directly in your native language (most D-BUS language bindings have their own IDL and proxy compilers).
SOM is more comparable with KParts and Bonobo. KParts have already evolved quite a bit ahead of SOM and Bonobo is slowly evolving too.
GObjects take the same niche as non-OLE2 COM objects in Windows. GNOME Bonobo is roughly the same as OLE2 and automation in Windows. Bonobo is now deprecated and GNOME team plans to move away from CORBA to D-BUS (http://live.gnome.org/DoYouKnow) and other solutions.
COM/SOM/CORBA are just plain too hard to use, so they are becoming obsolete very fast.
It can be used for intraprocess communication, but is not really the best tool for it.
It's much easier to use GObjects or KParts or your favorite component tool. And then use D-BUS to connect all of them together (for drag&drop, for example).
Linux already has more more powerful D-BUS system (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DBUS). It's already a base for PolicyKit, HAL daemons, soon it will be used in Upstart and so on.
It's MUCH MUCH easier to use than COM or SOM. And I still remember working with OpenDoc, so I don't really share good feelings toward SOM.
Slashdot Mirror
There's nothing complex about it, you can create more powerful thermite mixes with additional oxidizers (like potassium permanganate or potassium nitrate). They are described in a lot of chemical literature, there's nothing secret in it.
Of course, all this stuff is incredibly dangerous - it can burn through almost ANYTHING.
Linux monolithic kernel is obso....
Errr...
"Evidence of a deity" - that's something new!
Yes, but it is a part of GNU tools (which you most certainly can use on FreeBSD).
But it's not present in the 'native' FreeBSD userland.
One word that is shown to you is always known. The second one is unknown. In your case, you entered the known word correctly.
As anti-bot measure, reCAPTCHA starts showing pictures with BOTH known words if you (anyone with your IP) incorrectly guess two words in one hour, AFAIR.
I don't know. I think the best reason to use FreeBSD now is habit. And there's a huge number of working FreeBSD systems, so people just gradually upgrade them - no sense to fix something when it is not broken...
The other reasons are not very convincing. Personally, I like GNU userland better ("screen" - I love you!), for example. Glibc may not nice, but it works fine (I only looked at its sources when I needed to build a cross-platform toolchain).
Oh, and Linux has much better hardware support.
Actually, it's not known if Stalin was an atheist. Lenin certainly was, but Stalin had never said he was an atheist.
He certainly acted against the Orthodox Church, but it is not clear if he acted against the religion itself.
Actually, Brezhnev has not killed or imprisoned many people. Learn the history.
And Stalin studied at theological seminary (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stalin#Childhood_and_education.2C_1878.E2.80.931899).
Whoops.
You can buy a cheap fingerprint reader, like: http://www.amazon.com/Microsoft-DG2-00002-Fingerprint-Reader/dp/B0002WPSB2 and set it up using http://www.reactivated.net/fprint/wiki/Main_Page
I use it for my home computer without problems.
No, helium is getting expensive because government stopped subsidizing it.
There's a lot of helium in natural gas, but gas companies did not even bother extracting it. With the rising helium prices they are already looking into helium extraction.
I went on a several trips with climate scientists while I was in a university. I distinctly remember that meteo balloons were not that easy to pop.
And they also don't cost much. For example, I found this price: http://him-wettershop.com/ENG_276_EUR_0_722__.html - 11 euro for a balloon is quite OK. It should be even less if you buy them in quantity.
Helium is expensive, but there are VAST quantities of it. In any case, balloons do not require much of it.
Also, balloons will fly over the clouds, so they can use solar power during the day.
And I imagine that it's possible to create balloons with more lift.
Weather balloons do not 'pop' like common toy balloons.
If you make a tear in balloons fabric - it will slowly descend as the helium inside the balloon leaks.
Of course, if you tear balloon apart - it will fall lake a lead weight. But it's rather hard to do.
Because just several European gunships were able to conquer the China?
Chinese inventions were treated as novelties, they were not put into practical use.
We used EAP-TLS with RADIUS (last time I checked they even started to use smartcards) in the 'secured' perimter and everything worked with the built-in Windows wireless.
The outside VPN client required stupid Intel VPN, which is very annoying and not very stable.
The _intent_ of GPL is perfectly clear, it's written in plain English in the preamble. Literal meaning is also crystal clear.
Now, _technical_ _details_ of GPL enforcement, of course, won't be the same in all jurisdictions. For example, GPL technically was not enforceable in Russia a year ago.
But you don't NEED to know all technical details of GPL to understand most of GPL consequences. And you also can read nice FAQs on GPL from the FSF.
Yes, we tried it.
It turned out that it's easier to work without active VPN connection using only built-in Windows wireless. Besides, we have some additional security on VPN.
Tokens are useless until they are initialized. It's possible to compromise individual who has authorized access, but it's much harder. You probably won't be doing it unless you need to steal something VERY important.
Your example with Tony Blair is a bad one - there was no security breach, it was that just low-level security did not know the true situation.
On the contrary, GPL is written in a fairly comprehensible language.
I was able to understand it without any problem, and English is not even my native language.
In the last company I worked, we had TWO wireless networks. One worked for anyone with only minimal authorization (WEP key pasted on the wall) and it didn't have access to the corporate internal network.
The second one had strong WPA encryption with heavy logging and intrusion control.
There ARE ways to beat 'thermorectal cryptoanalysis' (i.e. shoving blowtorch up someone's ass), military have been using it since forever.
For example, a hacker won't be able to access the net without being present in the building.
Another way: use hardware authorization tokens which are forbidden to be taken from the building.
Yes, that's about right. Human brain contains about 1.5kg of brain matter (and it's estimated that around 700g is necessary for high-order brain functions), and mouse brain contains about 1g.
:)
I have made the same estimation personally few years ago
What use is SOM then? You can write D-BUS services directly in your native language (most D-BUS language bindings have their own IDL and proxy compilers).
SOM is more comparable with KParts and Bonobo. KParts have already evolved quite a bit ahead of SOM and Bonobo is slowly evolving too.
GObjects take the same niche as non-OLE2 COM objects in Windows. GNOME Bonobo is roughly the same as OLE2 and automation in Windows. Bonobo is now deprecated and GNOME team plans to move away from CORBA to D-BUS (http://live.gnome.org/DoYouKnow) and other solutions.
COM/SOM/CORBA are just plain too hard to use, so they are becoming obsolete very fast.
It can be used for intraprocess communication, but is not really the best tool for it.
It's much easier to use GObjects or KParts or your favorite component tool. And then use D-BUS to connect all of them together (for drag&drop, for example).
Linux already has more more powerful D-BUS system (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DBUS). It's already a base for PolicyKit, HAL daemons, soon it will be used in Upstart and so on.
It's MUCH MUCH easier to use than COM or SOM. And I still remember working with OpenDoc, so I don't really share good feelings toward SOM.