Slashdot Mirror


Google Interested in Wireless Bandwidth Balloons

An anonymous reader writes "Google is reportedly looking into investing in or buying a company called Space Data, which provides wireless voice and data services to remote areas with a fleet of weather balloons fitted with transceivers." My mind is sorta tripping over how something like this could work, but I gotta admit that the idea is really cool.

181 comments

  1. Rural area by esocid · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Space Data's business model is to provide low cost platforms for rural and remote data and voice communication applications via its high altitude SkySite network, which basically consists of an array of balloons equipped with a box of transceivers and other gadgets.
    This does seem pretty cool, except since they probably have a short lifespan, as well as being manipulated by weather and wind, that these won't be extremely reliable. It's well intentioned but I am just not sure how this will get off the ground (no pun intended).

    Balloon-borne transceivers are launched every 8 to 12 hours and last for about 24 hours before bursting and floating gently back down to earth. Each box of tricks carries a $100 reward for whoever finds it and returns it safely.
    So they are sending out a constant stream of weather balloons that may or may not cause concerns with air traffic (I'm not sure how high these go) that will end up just sitting in remote areas when they crash. It kind of seems like a pipe dream to me.
    --
    Absolute power corrupts absolutely. indymedia
    1. Re:Rural area by KublaiKhan · · Score: 5, Informative

      If they're the same weather balloons that the NOAA folks use, they float well above commercial air traffic lanes.

      --
      In Xanadu did Kubla Khan
      A stately pleasure dome decree
    2. Re:Rural area by apdyck · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I can't help but wonder about the costs. If they are paying $100 per baloon found, that's a huge chunk of change - for every baloon, 36,500/year (100/day, 24 hour float time). I would think that having tethered baloons would be a better idea, as they would not have to try to find them. Of course, you're still looking at occupying air space, and real estate on top of it if you secure them. Perhaps a better model would be to pay individuals $100/month to have a baloon tied out in their back yard, or some such.

      --
      .sig
    3. Re:Rural area by fracai · · Score: 1

      Cool, so they must be running Portal on Reality now!

      --
      -- i am jack's amusing sig file
    4. Re:Rural area by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yea, it seems like it should be a lot easier to get more endurance out of these things than they're getting...The balloon idea is mainly interesting as a jump off for some basically autonomous station keeping signal platforms...A small blimp covered with solar cells or powered by a large betavoltaic battery or something...

      As long as they're just spamming platforms that last for a day or two, the idea is pretty much doomed. The loss rate is going to be astronomical, and sending guys out in a truck to pick 'em up is in no way cost efficient.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    5. Re:Rural area by Thansal · · Score: 2, Insightful

      wait, I got it!

      Why don't we set up these polls that will have the hardware on top!

      We just need to space them out nice and evenly, and we wouldn't have to worry (as much) about weather effects. Heck, why limit our selves to just just traditional internet access. I bet I could rig up some sort of portable radio that could make use of these polls.

      I could call them PollRadios!

      Yah! I am going to make MILLIONS!

      So, seriously, what is the point of these balloons? I mean, I could see usages for it where you need to saturate an area with radio for a temporary time (for an always on type thing this just sounds way to cost prohibitive). Something like when if you have a manhunt (lost person/criminal/I don't care) going on in a wilderness area you could set up some sort of network with these things so that searchers could be in constant contact, and such.

      --
      Do Or Do Not, There Is No Spoon, There Is Only Zuul. Everything in the above post is probably opinion.
    6. Re:Rural area by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I would have modded you up, but you misspelled pole.

    7. Re:Rural area by Rampantbaboon · · Score: 1

      I think it would be a fun thing to do for whenever I go back home to visit my folks. Get the boots on and go baloon hunting, it's more profitable than coyote pelts.

    8. Re:Rural area by anexkahn · · Score: 1

      This thing would be perfect for emergency situations....for example:

      During the fires last year in San Diego the emergency personnel used cell phones, but had trouble getting reception. These balloons could help with that issue.

      The main problem about that situation was the Wind. You would have to tether the balloon to keep it in the area where you need it to be.

      --
      Curious about Storage and Virtualization? Check out
    9. Re:Rural area by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      better still, they charge you 100$ a month, and install a tethered balloon in your backyard to relay internet service to you. Then, they add receivers for your neighbor, and you get a price reduction for each customer that comes on via your balloon. with a minimum of 20$ a month. so, if you and 4 of your neighbors get on the service, you got a 20$ balloon in your back yard, and internet. THEN the company would make money, and not be a pipe dream.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    10. Re:Rural area by tinkerghost · · Score: 1

      Why don't we set up these polls that will have the hardware on top!
      We just need to space them out nice and evenly, and we wouldn't have to worry (as much) about weather effects. Heck, why limit our selves to just just traditional internet access. I bet I could rig up some sort of portable radio that could make use of these polls.

      Yep indeedee, that would be a Paula Bean Brillant idea, why it wouldn't take more than a pole every 20 miles in wide open spaces to handle that - how many square miles is Texas?. Every mile in rough terrain if you don't mind dead spots in the low points.

      Or you can pop a balloon up into the atmosphere, get better coverage over a larger area and not pay rent. The balloons are cheap, the hardware is expensive. If you can replace the equipment on 4 towers with 1 piece that's twice as expensive, you still have a lot of cash on hand to buy & maintain balloons. There are companies that already do this with blimps for special events that lack adequate coverage, so I can certainly see the potential to be cost effective.

    11. Re:Rural area by Monkey · · Score: 1

      I'd totally vote for hardware. Hardware rocks!

    12. Re:Rural area by Yez70 · · Score: 1

      So what happens when a local crop duster or life flight helicopter flies through this tethered balloon? It's definitely not a batter model.

    13. Re:Rural area by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't read the article, but it seems the latency and retransmissions involved in sending packets of data (presumably in USB flash drives or something) up on balloons would be a show-stopper.

    14. Re:Rural area by arktemplar · · Score: 1

      I remember that the team from India that won the TI-DSP design contest in 2006, had come up with a similar idea (cause I knew those guys), I think they called it wibonet or somthing equally inane, they wanted to use the idea for rural connectivity IIRC.

      yeah here's the link . http://tiidesigncontest.ext.ti.com/results.html, but it doesn't seem to have much in the way of information.

      --
      blog plug -> The Darker Side of Light
    15. Re:Rural area by TappedOut · · Score: 1

      I wonder if their business plan counts on them getting back their expensive electronics for a $100 reward. My guess is that if they want it back, they're going to have to bid for it on ebay.

    16. Re:Rural area by TheHorse13 · · Score: 1

      Google weather baloon $20,000 Google bounty paid for each baloon $100 An idiot with a .22 cal. rifle and a lot of spare time, priceless.

    17. Re:Rural area by Deadstick · · Score: 1

      A free balloon occupies airspace at one altitude. A tethered balloon occupies airspace at that altitude and every altitude below it.

      rj

    18. Re:Rural area by ad0gg · · Score: 1
      They currently launch 6 six a day, the ballon itself is $50, the radio is $1500 and parachutes back to earth after it reaches its lifespan. They are ballast altitude controlled and can control where they move much like hot air ballons by adjusting their elevation and catching different air currents.

      Tethered ballons you have issues with planes running into the lines and coping with the stress put on the line due to high speed winds.

      --

      Have you ever been to a turkish prison?

    19. Re:Rural area by javaexe · · Score: 1

      Yes you are right these work on same lines and float at about 60000 to 100000 ft. The commercial flights go up to 35000ft altitudes.

    20. Re:Rural area by mikael · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The Japanese experimented with incendiary devices that used the jet stream to travel across the USA. To maintain the correct altitude, the balloon would either dump ballast or vent hydrogen. It might even be possible to make of the fact that wind direction and speed can be completely different depending upon altitude.

      * Building a balloon that could survive a three-day trip across the Pacific and then automatically drop its warload was technically challenging. Since a hydrogen balloon expands in the sunlight and rises, then contracts at night and falls, the Japanese engineers had to develop a battery-operated automatic control system to maintain altitude. When the balloon descended below 9 kilometers (29,500 feet), it electrically fired charges to cut loose sandbags. The sandbags were carried on a cast-aluminum four-spoked wheel, and discarded two at a time to keep the wheel balanced. Similarly, when the balloon rose above about 11.6 kilometers (38,000 feet), the altimeter activated a valve to vent hydrogen; the hydrogen was also vented if the balloon's pressure reached a critical level.

      The balloon had to carry about 900 kilograms (1,000 pounds) of gear, which meant a hydrogen balloon with a diameter of about 10 meters (33 feet). At first, the balloons were made of conventional rubberized silk, but there was a cheaper way to make an envelope that leaked even less. An order went out for ten thousand balloons made of "washi", a paper derived from mulberry bushes that was impermeable and very tough. It was only available in squares about the size of a road map, so it was glued together in three or four laminations using paste derived from a tuber with the Japanese name of "devil's-tongue".

      Balloons in warfare

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    21. Re:Rural area by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      It's actually a pretty ingenious start-up solution.

      Initial costs are minimized by having such a cheap deployment cost. Costs are kept down by limiting the battery needs for the device, letting it drift, and having a practical coverage range. If the marginal cost to launch another balloon is only $225 given launch, recover, and mortality, they can quickly adapt to changing needs. Upgrading the network with new technology is about as easy as it gets... just mail out a new set of shoeboxes!

      Once you start adding complexity to it with solar cells and propulsion, costs can quickly spiral out of control.

      I'm just curious how much bandwidth they can muster out of a system like this...

    22. Re:Rural area by Fleeced · · Score: 1

      So they are sending out a constant stream of weather balloons that may or may not cause concerns with air traffic

      There's an idea... why not just fit planes with transmitters. There's enough of them criss-crossing at any one time to provide adequate coverage, isn't there?
    23. Re:Rural area by Atario · · Score: 1

      Or you could make the comm package an unfolding self-guided glider plane. Balloon pops, packages senses it, unfolds, glides back to nearest assigned pick-up point using GPS.

      My idea! Patent pending! Pay me!

      --
      "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
    24. Re:Rural area by ortholattice · · Score: 1
      Or you could make the comm package an unfolding self-guided glider plane. Balloon pops, packages senses it, unfolds, glides back to nearest assigned pick-up point using GPS.

      Realistically, you'll need a team of engineers for a couple of years to develop this so that it's reliable. With the risk of the cost of such a project spiralling out of control as unanticipated problems arise. And the lost opportunity of delaying deployment a couple to several years.

      Or you could have one employee with a pick-up truck assigned to retrieve the daily balloon. Even if most of the balloons fall in inaccessible areas, at several hundred dollars each that's still not much more than the cost of a couple of employees. The main thing I'd be concerned with is whether the balloons are biodegradable.

      I suppose such a project could be background R&D as the company grows, but even so the payback could be very long.

    25. Re:Rural area by nsfw · · Score: 1

      If only there were some sort of battery operated hand held transceiver device that could be carried into remote areas and be used to communicate to other people, a network if you will, so the searchers could remain in constant contact...

    26. Re:Rural area by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Each box of tricks carries a $100 reward for whoever finds it and returns it safely. What if an animal finds it before a human?
      "Silly rabbit, tricks are for kids!"
    27. Re:Rural area by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would think that having tethered baloons would be a better idea, as they would not have to try to find them. Of course, you're still looking at occupying air space, and real estate on top of it if you secure them. Perhaps a better model would be to pay individuals $100/month to have a baloon tied out in their back yard, or some such.
      And there's a precedent for this: Power companies that are using wind turbines in the Midwest (Kansas, Nebraska, etc.) lease a certain amount of acreage from farmers who have good wind flow. The farmers get a guaranteed check every month, and the power company gets the wind they need. The best part is that the wind turbines are high enough and have a small enough footprint that the farmers can continue to plant crops pretty close to the windmill.
    28. Re:Rural area by Eternauta3k · · Score: 1

      you'll need a team of engineers for a couple of years to develop this so that it's reliable Yeah, I'm sure you will.
      You probably wouldn't mind a few lost packages (they must be cheap for people to take $100 instead of stealing them)
      --
      Yeah. Would you choose a neurosurgeon who pokes around people's brains in his spare time? I wouldn't.
  2. The Internet as a Mesh Network by DigitalisAkujin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The beginning of the end for ISPs.

    The internet will eventually become a self propagating mesh network. (Case and point: One laptop per child)

    1. Re:The Internet as a Mesh Network by zienth · · Score: 4, Funny

      The internet is a series of balloons...

      Zienth

    2. Re:The Internet as a Mesh Network by emilper · · Score: 1

      great ... I want to download the Debian CDs, can I route the traffic through your laptop, please ? :-P

    3. Re:The Internet as a Mesh Network by swimin · · Score: 1
    4. Re:The Internet as a Mesh Network by somersault · · Score: 1

      I wonted to point that out two. It's so dafty cult trying to police every in-edu catered person on the internets throw. While I'd lie cthu pick every one of their dirty malaproprism-ing asses into bolivian, I'm war heed that one of them mite act tooly be burger then me and I'll get my ass picked in-spread. Be carefool, it's a doggy-dog world out there pee-poll.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    5. Re:The Internet as a Mesh Network by rho · · Score: 1

      John Sidgemore of UUNet used to talk about using balloons, too. ISPs sell infrastructure; they'll do okay.

      --
      Potato chips are a by-yourself food.
    6. Re:The Internet as a Mesh Network by Phisbut · · Score: 1

      I wonted to point that out two. It's so dafty cult trying to police every in-edu catered person on the internets throw. While I'd lie cthu pick every one of their dirty malaproprism-ing asses into bolivian, I'm war heed that one of them mite act tooly be burger then me and I'll get my ass picked in-spread. Be carefool, it's a doggy-dog world out there pee-poll.

      Duty Calls

      --
      After 3 days without programming, life becomes meaningless
      - The Tao of Programming
    7. Re:The Internet as a Mesh Network by LrdDimwit · · Score: 1

      It's not like a big kite!

    8. Re:The Internet as a Mesh Network by somersault · · Score: 1

      That's like the third time someone's posted an XKCD comic in reply to one of my comments in the last few days. I guess I should be flattered. Either that or I'll forever be in the shadow of that guy and his damned stickmen. His damned, awesome, sexy stickmen ._.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    9. Re:The Internet as a Mesh Network by Phisbut · · Score: 1

      That's like the third time someone's posted an XKCD comic in reply to one of my comments in the last few days. I guess I should be flattered. Either that or I'll forever be in the shadow of that guy and his damned stickmen. His damned, awesome, sexy stickmen ._.

      I just browsed XKCD for about half an hour looking for a comic that would fit as a reply, but couldn't find anything. I'll just post this random comic link then and hope it fits the discussion. Let me know how it goes.

      --
      After 3 days without programming, life becomes meaningless
      - The Tao of Programming
    10. Re:The Internet as a Mesh Network by somersault · · Score: 1

      Actually, as a reply to one of the comics that someone posted, I was like hey, that's a funny ass-comic. :) But that wasn't original, that was me copying that XKCD comic. Don't tell anyone.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    11. Re:The Internet as a Mesh Network by slashdotwannabe · · Score: 1

      PIPES! Not Balloons... I guess in the future we'll have both... won't that be a technological marvel!

      --
      This comment is my opinion and does not represent an official position of Donald Trump or others I do not work for
    12. Re:The Internet as a Mesh Network by zienth · · Score: 1

      Well, they can use those long skinny balloons, you know, the ones clowns use to tie into wiener dogs and things like that. They're kinda like pipes, and I'm sure they'll be really popular in Congress. Finally, something they can understand.

      Zienth

  3. Dear Google by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 5, Funny

    I have a BB Gun.

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    1. Re:Dear Google by corychristison · · Score: 1

      Dunno if that would wreak as much havoc as a missile launcher would.

      ;-)

    2. Re:Dear Google by techpawn · · Score: 1

      As the Military "proved" that they can hit a fuel tank that's in space.

      Sorta like shooting swamp rats back on Dagoba, yeah?

      --
      Ask not what you can do for your country. Ask what your country did to you
    3. Re:Dear Google by kat_skan · · Score: 1

      Holy crap! What kind of BB gun do you have that you aren't sure whether a BB gun would wreak as much havoc as a missile launcher?

    4. Re:Dear Google by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      A BB gun couldn't even cause a welt in your fellow angels at point-blank range.

    5. Re:Dear Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny
      Sorta like shooting swamp rats back on Dagoba, yeah?

      I was going to correct you but realized that being a pedantic Star Wars nerd is more embarrassing than being an inaccurate one.

    6. Re:Dear Google by trollboy · · Score: 3, Funny

      This has been done before. When there wasn't enough coverage you got a verbal warning msg.
      "Spawn more overlords"

      --
      That which is not dead may eternal lie,and in strange aeons even death may die
    7. Re:Dear Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, it's like everything I know and love about Slashdot was just blown to pieces by an intrepid adventurer firing through an impossible to hit vent leading to the core of the...

      Yeah.

    8. Re:Dear Google by Zerth · · Score: 2, Funny

      Red Ryder, of course.

    9. Re:Dear Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How pedantic is it to use the word pedantic?

    10. Re:Dear Google by Usquebaugh · · Score: 1

      You'll shoot your eye out kid.

    11. Re:Dear Google by Amouth · · Score: 1

      ahh.. it is christmass all over again

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    12. Re:Dear Google by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 1

      You must be part of the Lunatyc Frynge...

    13. Re:Dear Google by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

      Maybe not a Red Ryder, but there are pellet rifles that push a 25-30 grain (about 15.5 grains per gram) .22 cal pellet at 1000 feet/sec... this is almost the power of a 22 long rifle (1100 fps with a 35-40 grain bullet)

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    14. Re:Dear Google by Professor+Oompa · · Score: 1

      ...and I'm looking to collect $100 rewards.

  4. Why? by ShadowsHawk · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I love Google as much as the next slashdotter, but I have to wonder where they're going with this. Android, the dark fiber, Wifi balloons, etc. It doesn't really tie into advertising.

    1. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      i have to admit it seems like the idea of a stoner... "dude... we're going to send people wireless internet from a balloon... "

    2. Re:Why? by the4thdimension · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Possibly just a publicity stunt? We know that google shot themselves into the limelight and now they must try to stay there. Creative ideas to bring internet access to rural areas keep your good name alive among many. I believe they are attempting to continue to be seen as the "good" company where as many tech-oriented folks look at Microsoft as the "bad" company. Image is everything and I think they are trying to keep it together. However, I agree that this seems to be a bit out there.

    3. Re:Why? by The+End+Of+Days · · Score: 1

      The connection is obvious - people can't see Google's ads if they can't get to Google. Whether this is all worth it is something we will all shortly see.

    4. Re:Why? by evil_aar0n · · Score: 1

      It's all part of their "world domination" plan, Pinky...

      --
      Truth, Justice. Or the American Way.
    5. Re:Why? by peacefinder · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Google bidding in the FCC bandwidth auction in progress + balloon-based cell transceivers + dark fiber = cheap new national cell network for Android.

      Of course, there remain one or two technical obstacles...

      --
      With reasonable men I will reason; with humane men I will plead; but to tyrants I will give no quarter. -- William Lloyd
    6. Re:Why? by recharged95 · · Score: 1
      But it does tie into a bunch of nerdy, rich, smart guys, looking to make money and to "be cool" in solving world problems.

      According to Hollywood recent flicks, that's like being sort of a hero.

    7. Re:Why? by westlake · · Score: 2, Informative
      I believe they are attempting to continue to be seen as the "good" company where as many tech-oriented folks look at Microsoft as the "bad" company.

      Microsoft is underwriting the development and launch of a communications satellite for Africa. Cameroon: Microsoft Partners With Schools for IT Development You can not be more "out there" than that.

    8. Re:Why? by beavioso · · Score: 1

      Don't we see balloons over sporting events with big advertisements all the time? They could kill many birds with one stone. Provide advertising to those without internet devices at the big race, or event, and they could serve up lots of ads to those with the wireless access. Seems win-win.

    9. Re:Why? by Lisandro · · Score: 1

      Google bidding in the FCC bandwidth auction in progress + balloon-based cell transceivers + dark fiber = cheap new national cell network for Android.

      That wouldn't be exactly cheap, or even practical. Besides being only applicable in the US.

    10. Re:Why? by peacefinder · · Score: 1

      Hey, I was just answering the question. I never said it was a good idea! :-p

      --
      With reasonable men I will reason; with humane men I will plead; but to tyrants I will give no quarter. -- William Lloyd
    11. Re:Why? by ghyd · · Score: 1
      Right now, while writing, I'm watching a daily information TV show that I missed yesterday, which is a service provided by my ISP (and of course several important broadcasters). Free high quality IPTV and VOD (free as "included in the $45 up-to-20mbps ADSL line, free phone to 50 countries") are pretty much standard by now on usual ADSL2 lines, thanks mainly to a start up ISP (named Iliad-Free) which has an almost geeky understanding of technology, a talent for breakthrough innovations, a major use of open sources solutions (and which had a great start when the government decided that the major traditional operators had to lend lines at correct prices years ago.. by now the new ISP have developed their own . If that makes anyone think of some huge search engine business in the US, that's the feeling I wanted to convey. Also:

      In a move that could be replicated elsewhere, French telecommunications operator Iliad will soon allow its subscribers to make free wireless VoIP (voice over Internet Protocol) calls over their own and other people's phone lines. Iliad's broadband subsidiary, Free, introduced an upgraded modem, the Freebox HD, on Thursday, adding a high-speed Wi-Fi connection, support for HDTV (high-definition television) delivered over an IP connection and the ability to make Wi-Fi phone calls with an appropriate handset. http://www.infoworld.com/article/06/04/21/77650_HNfrenchroamingwifi_1.html Well, all this to say: may Google be following a similar path ? which is one of integration of TV-Internet-Phone to the point of indiferentiation, with numerous downward and upward services, in the best way available... here through ADSL landlines, there maybe through .. a "4.6 billion open wireless Internet" ?
  5. Google's day of reckoning coming soon by peter303 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The stock market has stopped believing Google's undisciplined business model will be that profitable and driven the stock price down considerably.

  6. Be sure not to paint 'em red by KublaiKhan · · Score: 4, Funny

    We all know what happens when 99 red balloons are floating in the summer sky.

    If they're carrying data, well, so much the worse...

    --
    In Xanadu did Kubla Khan
    A stately pleasure dome decree
    1. Re:Be sure not to paint 'em red by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      Nina Hagen singing about "99 Bluffed Balloons", or "99 Soft Balloons", or "99 Trial Balloons"?

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  7. Only a 24-hour lifespan? by smooth+wombat · · Score: 4, Insightful
    From the article:

    Balloon-borne transceivers are launched every 8 to 12 hours and last for about 24 hours before bursting and floating gently back down to earth. Each box of tricks carries a $100 reward for whoever finds it and returns it safely.

    That's an awful waste of resources not to mention what happens if someone is transmitting a signal when the balloon in your area pops? How much does all this constant launching and recovering cost compared to just putting in a tower despite the remoteness?

    I can see using these balloons for limited times, such as emergencies, or battlefield conditions where there are no cell towers (as the article intimates) but for every day use? I don't think so.

    And what is this 'floating gently back down to earth' stuff? Unless they have a parachute, the tranceiver will not be floating gently back down to earth when the balloon pops. It will be plummeting.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    1. Re:Only a 24-hour lifespan? by bugs2squash · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think this is why HALE (High-Altitude Long-Endurance) Aircraft have been proposed as a more reasonable solution

      --
      Nullius in verba
    2. Re:Only a 24-hour lifespan? by Cyberax · · Score: 4, Informative

      Weather balloons do not 'pop' like common toy balloons.

      If you make a tear in balloons fabric - it will slowly descend as the helium inside the balloon leaks.

      Of course, if you tear balloon apart - it will fall lake a lead weight. But it's rather hard to do.

    3. Re:Only a 24-hour lifespan? by robertjw · · Score: 1

      That's an awful waste of resources not to mention what happens if someone is transmitting a signal when the balloon in your area pops? How much does all this constant launching and recovering cost compared to just putting in a tower despite the remoteness?

      I can see using these balloons for limited times, such as emergencies, or battlefield conditions where there are no cell towers (as the article intimates) but for every day use? I don't think so.
      Well, let's speculate on costs a bit.

      It's safe to assume that these cost more than $100, or it wouldn't be worth paying a $100 reward for their return, so let's assume $200 per balloon.

      One every 8-12 hours is about 2.5/day.

      2.5/day * $200 * 365 days = $182,500/year

      High altitude balloons should be able to cover significantly more territory than a ground based cell tower. I have no idea of exact range, but let's be conservative and say a balloon could cover the territory of 10 towers.

      Looks like there are no good numbers for costs on towers, but some estimates I found say 250K to put one up and around $700/month to lease a piece of property in a rural area.

      In the same 1 year time frame 10 towers would cost $250,000 * 10 + $700 * 12 * 10 = $2,584,000

      Over 10 years, the cost of the towers, assuming no equipment upgrades, would be $250,000 * 10 + $700 * 12 * 10 * 10 = $3,340,000 or $334,000/year

      Of course, this is all speculation, but it is quite possible the weather balloon idea is significantly cheaper than building and maintaining a large number of cell towers.
    4. Re:Only a 24-hour lifespan? by redxxx · · Score: 2, Informative

      well, that and the whole being able to keep a HALE on station. Balloons get pushed around by the wind, so even if they stayed afloat, they would end up where they were you didn't need them.

    5. Re:Only a 24-hour lifespan? by Zach978 · · Score: 2, Informative
      Wall Street Journal has a much more complete article about these balloons, and a video.

      According to the article:

      The electronic gear they carry, encased in a small Styrofoam box, then drifts gently back to earth on tiny parachutes.
      [..]
      While the balloons are cheap and disposable at $50 a pop, the transceivers they carry are worth about $1,500. Once a transceiver is released from its balloon to parachute back to earth, there's no way to predict where it will land. So Space Data has hired 20 hobbyists with GPS devices to track them down.

      --

      "I told you a million times not to exaggerate!"
    6. Re:Only a 24-hour lifespan? by dargaud · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you make a tear in balloons fabric - it will slowly descend as the helium inside the balloon leaks. No.

      I spent a year launching weather balloons from Antarctica. They take about one hour to reach 20~30km altitude, then the latex tears up (remember, as the pressure decreases, the volume increases) and the plummet to the ground in less then 10 minutes. In rare cases what's left of the latex will form a parachute shape and they will drop slower.

      If you fill them more, they go up faster and blow up earlier (as the latex reaches its maximum thinness earlier). If you underfill them, you get less buoyancy, and they can float for a long time if they don't go up to where they'll pop, which is probably what you want here.

      But I have to remind you that:

      • latex is expensive (at least for daily balloon launches, you are OK with your S&M fantasies).
      • helium is very expensive and world quantities are limited and will run out before petroleum does.
      • a standard weather balloon can lift only about 200 grams, which pretty much limits the quantity of battery and thus the wifi power range you can carry.
      All that being said I think it's a neat idea, but not as much as solar powered ultra-light drones.
      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    7. Re:Only a 24-hour lifespan? by westlake · · Score: 3, Insightful
      And what is this 'floating gently back down to earth' stuff?

      How many of the packages can they realistically expect to recover?

      "Rural and remote" suggests difficult terrain, dense cover, lakes and ponds, and very few people. I don't think we are talking about the cornfields in Nebraska.

      What most puzzles me is why Google wants to enter a market difficult and expensive to service, and with so little prospect of a significant return.

    8. Re:Only a 24-hour lifespan? by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      I went on a several trips with climate scientists while I was in a university. I distinctly remember that meteo balloons were not that easy to pop.

      And they also don't cost much. For example, I found this price: http://him-wettershop.com/ENG_276_EUR_0_722__.html - 11 euro for a balloon is quite OK. It should be even less if you buy them in quantity.

      Helium is expensive, but there are VAST quantities of it. In any case, balloons do not require much of it.

      Also, balloons will fly over the clouds, so they can use solar power during the day.

      And I imagine that it's possible to create balloons with more lift.

    9. Re:Only a 24-hour lifespan? by ChrisA90278 · · Score: 1

      "what happens if someone is transmitting a signal when the balloon in your area pops? "

      The ballons last for 24 hours and new ones are sent up ooevery 12 to 8 hours. So that means
      there are always two or three balons up in the air. The way your phone works is that it always
      connects to the "best" tower. So when a balloon pop you phone will then connect to the next-best
      balloon.

      Towers can only be a few tens of feet tall and their service area is small. At the height of
      a tower the earth's horizon is only about 25 miles. The Ballon can see for many hundreds of mile
      so the square area covered is many hundreds of times larger.

      Next qestion: If you own a cell tower how much rent do you pay for the space the tower takes up?
      is it $600 a month or $6,000 a month. Figure the balloon pays zero. next, hown many towers
      can a balloon replace. Maybe 100 towers. What is the rent per month for 100 towers?

      The thing to remember is that rent money has a short lifespan too. You pay the landowner
      every month and the next month you have to pay again. Kind of like the balloon

    10. Re:Only a 24-hour lifespan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Weather balloons do not 'pop' like common toy balloons. Wrong. Latex weather balloons last a lot longer, stretch a lot more, go a lot higher, but they do indeed pop.
    11. Re:Only a 24-hour lifespan? by ducatier · · Score: 0

      Wont this affect the helium supply?

    12. Re:Only a 24-hour lifespan? by SPY_jmr1 · · Score: 1

      What most puzzles me is why Google wants to enter a market difficult and expensive to service, and with so little prospect of a significant return. Kinda like a website that people can go to to look for other things without knowing the exact url?

      If only such a site existed. Alas, it's too hard and pricey. Oh well, at least we never tried it. It might just work.
    13. Re:Only a 24-hour lifespan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Helium is expensive, but there are VAST quantities of it. In any case, balloons do not require much of it.

      Helium is becoming expensive, precisely because there are not vast quantities of it (available at least). Like the GP said, helium could run out a lot sooner than our petroleum reserves. We can't scrounge the stuff from the air in any efficient way, because it's so light that it floats up and out of the atmosphere, eventually being carried off by the solar wind, and photons trading their momentum to helium atoms, knocking them out of orbit. The only place it exists naturally, in any worthwhile concentration is in the ground, usually mixed with natural gas, and as it is, it's only processed by a few places around the world... When it becomes more profitable to extract helium, more gas extractors will begin to do so, as it is, a ton of it escapes, because it's expensive to process out of natural gas.

    14. Re:Only a 24-hour lifespan? by westlake · · Score: 1
      Kinda like a website that people can go to to look for other things without knowing the exact url?

      How many new "clicks" will Google register from North Dakota?

      If you are making serious money in the boonies and are shopping for breeding stock or a $45,000 tractor you are probably comfortable with your dial-up ISP or have found a serviceable alternative like satellite broadband.

    15. Re:Only a 24-hour lifespan? by Jarik_Tentsu · · Score: 1

      In 20 years time, when the internet infrastructure is reliant on these things, China will start testing their "Anti-Balloon Missile Program".

      ~Jarik

    16. Re:Only a 24-hour lifespan? by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      No, helium is getting expensive because government stopped subsidizing it.

      There's a lot of helium in natural gas, but gas companies did not even bother extracting it. With the rising helium prices they are already looking into helium extraction.

  8. Tom Foolery by arizwebfoot · · Score: 1

    How do they keep people from stealing the balloons and thusly the transceivers?

    --
    Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy.
    1. Re:Tom Foolery by thrillseeker · · Score: 1

      offer them money to not steal them, and prosecute them if they do?

  9. Why not tethered? by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It seems that if this company simply tethered their balloons to the ground, they could minimize losses, and thus could afford to deploy far more robust balloons, which could last significantly longer than 24 hours. If a balloon exceeds its life span, sustains damage, or requires maintenance or updates to its payload, it could simply be reeled in as a replacement is reeled out.

    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    1. Re:Why not tethered? by esocid · · Score: 1

      Then you would have to worry about how to keep them afloat for such a long period of time and how high to let them float to send an optimal signal over distance. Plus putting lights on it for night visibility for low-flying aircraft. Just letting them go seems more practical, yet impractical in other areas, such as cost like you mention, as well as balloons that crash in remote areas that no one will ever find. That's an awful lot of equipment to just send up in the air and hope to get it returned.

      --
      Absolute power corrupts absolutely. indymedia
    2. Re:Why not tethered? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nope - tethering is a non-starter.

      If you tether the balloon, the altitude has to be very low or else the cable would be a hazard to aircraft. The whole idea is to put these up so high that they are well out of the way of air traffic. Also, the higher you go, the bigger the area you can cover.

      Think of these as cheap, low altitude satellites.

    3. Re:Why not tethered? by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 1

      You know, it is possible to route aircraft around areas... Aircraft generally don't fly hither and yon, wherever they please...they adhere to approved flight plans.

      --
      ____

      ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    4. Re:Why not tethered? by The+End+Of+Days · · Score: 1

      Well, they're talking about remote areas so you'll have things like cropdusters, potentially, amongst other possibilities.

      Truthfully, I dunno. I live in the city.

    5. Re:Why not tethered? by The-Perl-CD-Bookshel · · Score: 1

      That adds the additional cost of leasing space from landowners (read: farmers) who are accustomed to getting at least $5,000/year for a small footprint land lease agreement.

      --
      I don't keep a lid on my coffee so when I walk around I look busy -me
    6. Re:Why not tethered? by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 1

      True, but that's $5,000/year vs. $36,500/year ($100/day) with their existing model. Even with paying landowners a premium, they still would come out ahead.

      --
      ____

      ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    7. Re:Why not tethered? by Yarrr · · Score: 3, Informative

      Aircraft under VFR flight rules do fly hither and yon, where ever they want (in class G airspace) and flight plans are not always required or even need to be approved. Thats just how SAR finds you when you have an "unplanned landing". There is no requirement for contact with ATC, and you can fly as low as 500 feet AGL, and even lower if the weather is closing in. Sending up 2-3 balloons a day would not be a big deal but making a mesh network of weather balloons, say 20 a day would cause a hazard. Maybe going as far as switching a large area to restricted airspace. Which would require printing of new maps/NOTAMS.

    8. Re:Why not tethered? by magus_melchior · · Score: 1

      They probably don't want to deal with property purchase/rental and building permits beyond what's needed to toss a balloon into the air. At least, not in the experimental phase.

      --
      "We are Microsoft. You shall be assimilated. Competition is futile."
    9. Re:Why not tethered? by Thelasko · · Score: 1

      Yeah! Just like a Barrage Balloon!

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    10. Re:Why not tethered? by GreatDane · · Score: 1

      http://www.spacedata.net/skysite.html

      They only need to use some monofilament to tether the balloons at 40,000 - 60,000 feet. Of course, then we get planes sliced in half as they fly at 500 feet.

      Space Data is flying these puppies in what is technically called the "stratosphere." Doing so gives them "400 mile circles" (is that radius, diameter, or area?) of coverage. If you tethered them at 500 feet or lower, I'm betting the coverage would be a little smaller.

  10. no imagination. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My mind is sorta tripping over how something like this could work, but I gotta admit that the idea is really cool.

    I think you have very little imagination

  11. It almost seemed like a good idea... by Damocles+the+Elder · · Score: 1

    I could see this working if you run, say, a WAP up with a balloon and use an ethernet cable as a balloon string, but floating them around and having them "float" (ha ha) back down to earth every 24 hours and trusting that someone'll actually see them (as compared to running them over with a tractor in a huge field of what-have-you), AND return them, seems unworkable.

    1. Re:It almost seemed like a good idea... by dohzer · · Score: 1

      Who cares about someone "running them over with a tractor".
      I'd be more worried about someone running into it with an aircraft.

  12. Stratellite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The article describes using short-term balloons:

    Balloon-borne transceivers are launched every 8 to 12 hours and last for about 24 hours before bursting and floating gently back down to earth. Each box of tricks carries a $100 reward for whoever finds it and returns it safely. I wonder if they considered stratellites (stratospheric satellite) or similar technology. The idea there is to have a very-high altitude automated airship that has solar panels on the topside and wireless relays on the underside. It hovers over a given location, providing wireless coverage. The company claims that they can cover an entire city with a single one. They are intended to stay aloft for months or years (and be reusable). As far as I know it's still more concept than reality, unfortunately. It sounds like a cool idea.
  13. It's a Niche Business Model by StaticEngine · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When people's Android cellphones are reporting their every move via a network of wi-fi weather baloons, Google will have totally cornered the market of Paranoid Schitzophrenic consumers.

    1. Re:It's a Niche Business Model by rootofevil · · Score: 2, Funny

      cornering paranoid schizophrenics?

      that doesnt sound like a good idea to me.

      at least not if you want to live.

      --
      turn up the jukebox and tell me a lie
    2. Re:It's a Niche Business Model by curunir · · Score: 1

      On the plus side, you get at least twice as many customers per customer as you do with sane customers.

      --
      "Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos!"
  14. Helium Shortage by Ilan+Volow · · Score: 3, Informative

    I wonder how Google plans to deal with the rising cost of helium?

    http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/01/14/0219246&from=rss

    --
    Ergonomica Auctorita Illico!
    1. Re:Helium Shortage by esocid · · Score: 1

      Easy, just use hydrogen

      --
      Absolute power corrupts absolutely. indymedia
    2. Re:Helium Shortage by KublaiKhan · · Score: 1

      Just call it "Project Hindenberg" and announce a commitment to the creation of a hydrogen-based infrastructure.

      You'll be all set.

      --
      In Xanadu did Kubla Khan
      A stately pleasure dome decree
    3. Re:Helium Shortage by east+coast · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I wonder how Google plans to deal with the rising cost of helium?

      Hydrogen?

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    4. Re:Helium Shortage by DrData99 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just use hot air...

    5. Re:Helium Shortage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be Microsoft. They're full of it.

    6. Re:Helium Shortage by Zach978 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      According to the WSJ they use hydrogen.

      --

      "I told you a million times not to exaggerate!"
    7. Re:Helium Shortage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      rising cost of helium Get it...? Rising... Helium...

    8. Re:Helium Shortage by Shadowlore · · Score: 1

      While hot air is less efficient than helium, between politicians, the media, and pundits we have a surplus of that they could look into harnessing. I'm sure Google engineers could come up with algorithms to figure out who provides the most and tap those ummm resources... first.

      --
      My Suburban burns less gasoline than your Prius.
  15. Liability by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1
    I would think that there is too much liability involved. Think of the lawsuits after one of these things comes down on a house / car / animal / small child... Or what if a plane slams into one killing a few 100 people. And, who's responsible for the ecological damage of this trash landing in the oceans / lakes / rivers / forest?

    From a cute sci-fi sort of view it's "neat-o", but wildly unpractical.

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    1. Re:Liability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would think that there is too much liability involved. Think of the lawsuits after one of these things comes down on a house / car / animal / small child... Or what if a plane slams into one killing a few 100 people. And, who's responsible for the ecological damage of this trash landing in the oceans / lakes / rivers / forest?

      I sort of agree with you, but then I think guns/beer/cars...there are lots of other much more dangerous things out there, and there'll always be idjits.

      A GPS device makes finding downed bits easier. And I'd bet beer cans, shell casings, cheap lead shot, and air pollution do more wilderness damage in a few hours than this'll ever contribute.

    2. Re:Liability by mweather · · Score: 1

      The Japanese already answered this question. They released hundreds of balloons loaded with explosives on timers, and calculated how long it would take them to get to the US. The goal was to start massive fires. Over 1000 were launched. The kill rate was 0.067%, and that was because they found it in a tree and pulled it down. Telecommunications equipment, thankfully doesn't explode quite as easily. This wouldn't be nearly as bad as the occasional jet jettisoning fuel over a city.

  16. Packets flying through the air by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This reminds me of RFC 1149.

  17. Time for another FOX UFO Special by Vampyre_Dark · · Score: 1

    Featuring an entire small town wearing tinfoil coated trucker caps to hide from those evil, thought reading, transceivers. Cue those blurry night vision shots and man in the rubber Grey mask.

  18. Google has to earn more money by backslashdot · · Score: 1

    Google's stock price is inflated so they need to do stuff like this to satisfy the high forward P/E ratio.

    Soon, they'll probably have to get into the hardware biz and compete with companies like Sun, IBM, Apple.

    Hmm that brings up the prospect of high end linux laptops, mp3 players, gaming devices, and HDTV's from Google to compete. It could happen. They'll need a top dog designer though.

  19. I wonder what they'll call it? by Kelbear · · Score: 5, Funny

    Let me be the first to suggest:

    "Skynet"

  20. hot air by ionix5891 · · Score: 0

    well the balloons are not the only thing full of hot air, just look at Google's stock for last year

  21. Digital Donkey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These weather balloons remind me of a Digital Donkey. http://virtudyne.com/

  22. Telco's end by bobs666 · · Score: 1

    Your dead on.

    We have no need for the phone co.

    1. Re:Telco's end by clark0r · · Score: 1

      you're

    2. Re:Telco's end by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe you meant "You're", not "you're".

      Signed,
      Capitalization Nazi

  23. Cost Analysis by maokh · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Every 8 hours means 3 launches a day, or 1095 launches a year.

    With even the cheapest base station hardware, helium, balloon (at say, $5000 per unit), costs would exceed $14.6M/year per site.

    This does not include the labor to continuously manufacturer, transport, and launch equipment.

    At a rate of $50/month per subscriber, you would need about 25,000 to break even on base station--hardware alone. This does not include the uplink facility, bandwidth costs, and business administration costs.

    I have seen quite a few telemetry balloon launches and return of balloon hardware has never happened even once. Balloons seem fall in the most remote areas, getting caught in trees, landing in the ocean, etc. If a human ever encounters the hardware, they certainly are not very honest about returning it. Even at a modest recovery rate of 1%-5%, it wouldnt be worth the trouble. This sounds like a major environmental hazard too.

    Whoever wrote this business plan is on crack. $15 million a year for the equivalent of 14 base stations?! In a rural area? Instead of using grain silos?

    And what is this 'floating gently back down to earth' stuff? Unless they have a parachute, the tranceiver will not be floating gently back down to earth when the balloon pops. It will be plummeting

    The FAA has quite a few requirements for balloons, including a) payload to have a parachute apon balloon failure b) radar reflectors so ground controllers and aircraft can see them c) remote "self destruct system" to release balloon, among others.

    1. Re:Cost Analysis by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 3, Informative

      From the WSJ article, the shoebox is $1,500, launch is $50 (they use H2 rather than He), and recovery $100. They pay farmers to launch them and adventurers to recover them, included in that cost. With 5% mortality, the cost per balloon is $225, or cost per year $82k. Since the boxes are so cheap, they can distribute 20-30 to different farmers to launch when requested. The recovery is aided by GPS coordinates, but I will admit it wouldn't be worth $100 to me to go out and find one.

      The coverage should be ~50 mile radius.

      To build a base station to do the same thing you would need at least a 300' mast and microwave links between them, plus you have to lease the ground. I don't think you can pull it off with less than a 3-year payback; you also need more prime airwaves.

    2. Re:Cost Analysis by gasmasher · · Score: 1

      Whoever wrote this business plan is on crack. $15 million a year for the equivalent of 14 base stations?! In a rural area? Instead of using grain silos?

      Maybe part of the business plan is that people will keep them (maybe after purchasing on ebay). If they are designed to be a mesh network there will be at least a percentage of them in peoples homes working as part of the network.

      If they install on towers they have to pay rental but they wouldn't have to pay the land rental or tiny bit of electricity required to run them if people brought them home and powered them up. It seems like they could build a pretty huge mesh network by moving their launch sites around and letting the masses spread out the infrastructure.

  24. Sounds unpossible by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

    Each box of tricks carries a $100 reward for whoever finds it and returns it safely.


    Hmm. I can't help wondering how something that's worth $100 per day to google isn't worth the finder keeping forever.
    1. Re:Sounds unpossible by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      Hmm. I can't help wondering how something that's worth $100 per day to google isn't worth the finder keeping forever.


      Well, perhaps its identifiable, and contains some kind of locating system that enables the operator to locate it at need, but the $100 reward is just an incentive so that the operating company saves on going out and recovering some of them, so the finder keeping it forever isn't really a viable option.

  25. Whatever colour, we're screwed by TheEmptySet · · Score: 3, Informative

    The colour of the balloons is just an artefact of the translation from the song's original German where they were just "99 Luftballons" (actually the German lyrics tell a much better story as the translation changes a lot). So the world is over whatever colour they make them.

    1. Re:Whatever colour, we're screwed by KublaiKhan · · Score: 1

      Interesting...but I don't speak German, and only know the english version. ;-P

      --
      In Xanadu did Kubla Khan
      A stately pleasure dome decree
    2. Re:Whatever colour, we're screwed by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 1

      I had a great German teacher in high school. We translated the lyrics of that and "Der Kommissar" from their German versions into English.

    3. Re:Whatever colour, we're screwed by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, and "Major Tom/Voellig Losgeloest".

    4. Re:Whatever colour, we're screwed by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

      So, I looked up the German version and here is my own translation of the song. Of course it doesn't rhyme anymore. ;-)

      Do you have some time for me
      Then I'll sing you a song
      About 99 balloons
      On their way to the horizon
      Do you perhaps right now think of me
      Then I'll sing you a song
      About 99 balloons
      And that this from that comes

      99 balloons
      On their way to the horizon
      Were considered UFOs from outer space
      Because of that a General
      Send a fighter squad after them
      To Alert if it was that
      But on the horizon were
      Just 99 balloons

      99 fighterjets
      Everyone a great fighter
      Thought they were Captain Kirk
      Then there was a big firework
      The neighbours didn't get it
      And immediately felt threathened
      But on the horizon they were shooting
      On 99 balloons

      99 war ministers
      Match and jerrycan
      Thought they were smart men
      Anticipated great loot
      Yelled: war and we want and power
      Who would have thought that
      That it would come that far
      Because of 99 balloons

      99 years of war
      Didn't leave a place for winners
      War ministers don't exits anymore
      And no fighterjets either
      Today I walk around
      See the world in ashes
      I found a balloon
      Think of you and let him fly

  26. kinda sorta gotta find a cluebat by sm62704 · · Score: 1

    My mind is sorta tripping over how something like this could work, but I gotta admit that the idea is really cool.

    Yo! You be trippin' about dis sheeit, but you not be unnerstandin' how fuckin' moronic it make you be lookin', foo. Word.

    I speak redneck fluently, too, y'all. It ain't gonna make nobody thank I'm booklarned neither.

    The summary was so, shall we say, "unlearned" that I doubt far too seriously that if someone with the lack of communication skills exhibited by the anonymous submitter submitted it, then it can't be worth reading. Did this fellow ever make it past the 8th grade?

    The harder you try to be cool, the more uncool you look. Cool people don't try. Just submit the damned story in the English you learned in school, or risk being thought not only a fool but a poser as well.

    -mcgrew

    --
    mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    1. Re:kinda sorta gotta find a cluebat by piemcfly · · Score: 1

      For a 'learned' person you're awefully quick to interpret quirky spelling as trying to be cool and 'posing'. It might just as well be a habit or an accepted way of expressing him/herself within his/her own dialect group. If that's the case, one might argue that the non-conformity and lack of class-aspiration in that post is in fact the opposite of 'posing'. One might also argue that your post was pretentious and offensive and that you are thus a 'jerkwad', 'douchebag' or an 'exceptionally pompous individual', to use your idea of 'standard english'.

    2. Re:kinda sorta gotta find a cluebat by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      Well, as flamebait goes, yours was at least gramattically correct. I thank you for that.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    3. Re:kinda sorta gotta find a cluebat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Noob:

      Don't.Feed.The.Trolls.

  27. What about this poll? by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 0, Troll

    According to a recent poll, 78% of Slashdot comments contain simple words that are spelled incorrectly.

    --
    "But this one goes to 11!"
    1. Re:What about this poll? by Colbalt+Blue · · Score: 1

      Another poll showed that 33% of all statistics in Slashdot comments are jokes.

  28. The begining of the end of nice ping rates by headbulb · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Mesh networks are interesting, but a wireless one that would be required would have way too many hops. Then the congestion on each hop would be high too.

    Ping rates would go down the tubes.

    1. Re:The begining of the end of nice ping rates by bobs666 · · Score: 1

      I agree, you get more hops. I would rather have the hops Many of us right now have 0 hops. as home right now. Or an old 56KB modem. I would rather have the hops, and I would also like more then 2 places to get access. The phone and cable is not all the ISP's we could have if we had a mesh Network. Its not like I am telling you you can't use your Phone or Cable network. But why not have a Mesh Network as well.

      Roof Top boxes would work, if only the FCC had let Apple start the ball rolling in the 90's. Its no wounder we are so far behind so much of the world in connectivity.

  29. In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft announces the acquisition of Daisy Outdoor Products (BB guns) in order to head off Google.

  30. Re:Scott Draker interview about CmdrTaco's faggotr by somersault · · Score: 1

    "Most victims state that they are only trying to "root" a victim's "box." A true lol moment :D
    --
    which is totally what she said
  31. Missing the point by spydum · · Score: 1

    If the business model was completely viable, they would already be out there taking over the market, making money. Google isn't interested because its a viable option they can immediately turn around and profit. They are interested because its a non-traditional approach to a common problem. That is what google is about -- thinking differently (sorry Apple!).

    1. Re:Missing the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      is nontraditional the same as stupid?

  32. Lies! by Relic+of+the+Future · · Score: 1
    http://techdirt.com/articles/20080220/123009308.shtml

    Techdirt claims it (probably) ain't so.

    --
    Those who fail to understand communication protocols, are doomed to repeat them over port 80.
  33. Terrible idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These polls don't have a Cowboy Neal option.

  34. About the balloons... by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

    It's been said that every one's a super hero - every one's a Captain Kirk!

    --
    Bow-ties are cool.
  35. Skynet by PyroGX2000 · · Score: 1

    I cant put tags. Someone please put 'skynet' tag ;) Those tags are hilarious!

  36. To the US Government... by Piranhaa · · Score: 2, Funny

    At least if Google loses contact with the balloon, it's still in the earth's atmosphere and won't necessarily need missiles to shoot it down, but merely a sniper rifle would suffice

  37. Solved Problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    uh, why would this be better?

    assuming you want to limit yourself to line of site RF
    (for a bunch of reasons) then what's wrong with ground based
    towers?

    Depending on wind/weather issues, I would think you could
    even build structures out of wood.

    Guyed towers can reduce the steel requirements a lot though,
    with sections being able to be carried by humans or animals.
    100 ft guyed towers are pretty cheap to erect. Probably less
    than $5000. Don't need much concrete either.

    Or take advantage of topography (hills)

    Here's an analysis of height requirements vs distance
    (frenel distance issues etc)
    http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_memoranda/RM3762/RM3762.chap5.html

    100 ft tower can probably get you a 20 mile link at 5Ghz no problem.
    10 of them to go 200 miles. ..plus you can mount all
    your local repeaters.

    1. Re:Solved Problem? by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      assuming you want to limit yourself to line of site RF
      (for a bunch of reasons) then what's wrong with ground based
      towers?


      The cost of the ground, among other things.

    2. Re:Solved Problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're solving the wrong problem. If you are just building a line of repeaters, then you can get line-of-sight between two 100' towers 20mi apart. If you're trying to provide wireless service to many square miles, a 100' tower won't cut it. Building towers is expensive, requiring permits, building materials, and leasing land. That seems like a whole lot of work compared to tossing a few weather balloons up in the sky every day!

      dom

  38. You obviously don't know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...how a mesh network really works... (or actually stops working), once you get past a few hops away from a backbone injection node. In a mesh, every hop away from you halves the bandwidth and doubles the latency. Four hops away and you're down to 1/16 of the bandwidth of each node, and 16-fold the latency. This is the dirty little secret all the mesh hardware companies didn't want cities to know as they were selling them the Muni-wifi boondoggle. Meshing a large area like a city only works when you can insert a backbone connection/backhaul about every 3 or 4 hops, else your effective thruput between any two arbitrary points on the mesh goes down the crapper.

  39. Cloud Computing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reaches new hieghts with Google.

  40. Sanswire? by colonslash · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know what happened to the plans from Sanswire? This sounded more feasible to me.

  41. How that meeting went... by holyspidoo · · Score: 1

    A google boss walks in on a google employee playing Balloon Fight on a NES emulator Google boss: What's this? Playing on your 20% time?? Busted employee: Errr... well... it's research! We could buy a balloon company and rule the wifi world. Google boss: Fantastic idea Johnson! Also, let us buy some fishermen to make sure those pesky fishes don't eat our balloons! Employee: ....riiiight... boss: To the buying room!!!

  42. So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who ordered the beowulf cluster of bandwidth?

  43. Google Baloons by manwithmanyquestions · · Score: 1

    I have an idea - why dont the tether the ballons to a cell tower! LMFAO!

  44. Alt:~25-30Km, Coverage:~500Km with 802.16* by OldHawk777 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    --
    Unaccountable leaders are masters, and unrepresented people are slaves. How do US and EU fare?
  45. A few more URLinks on Modern AirShip Technologies by OldHawk777 · · Score: 1
    --
    Unaccountable leaders are masters, and unrepresented people are slaves. How do US and EU fare?
  46. Dirt cheap labor, but for how long? by westlake · · Score: 1
    there's no way to predict where it will land. So Space Data has hired 20 hobbyists with GPSS devices to track them down.

    From the article: Recovery missions can get intense. Workers have had to pluck transceivers out of trees in Louisiana, rappel down rocky cliffs in Arizona, trudge through swamps and kayak across ponds. Space Data pays them $100 per transceiver recovered.
    "These things can fall anywhere," says Chip Kyner of San Antonio, who once hiked seven miles before finding the transmitter he was looking for. The final mile was in pitch darkness.
    "It wasn't worth the $100," he says, "but it's a neat story."

    What happens to this scheme when your recovery teams start demanding hourly wages, mileage and hazard pay?

    I hear talk of cheaper cell phone service. But does the rural customer see faster, cheaper or less restricted Internet service then he can get from dial-up or satellite?

  47. Mounting equipment on 'polls'... by RudeIota · · Score: 1

    Why don't we set up these polls that will have the hardware on top!
    Don't be impollite! Maybe he's excited about the upcoming 2008 U.S. presidential election? Then again, that might not be the reason if he lives elsewhere, like in Polland... and if he's Pollish, that would mean he may not be so interested in U.S pollitics, right?

    Oh well, this was just some unrefined extrapollation... Never mind, I forgot where I was going with this.

    OK, I'm off to work on my Pollitzer Prize piece.
    --
    Fact: Everything I say is fiction.
  48. Airships are the way to go. by blankoboy · · Score: 2, Insightful
    These disposable balloons, while a cute idea, are simply too hobby/garage level. Google, with giant coffers, need to think on a grander 'Bladerunneresque' scale. They should instead deploy manned/autonomous airships (blimps) to serve this purpose.

    These airships could serve multiple purposes (among many others I'm sure Google's clever folks could come up with):

    - Photography for Google Maps.
    - Airvertising as another revenue source.
    - Weather.

    1. Re:Airships are the way to go. by dwye · · Score: 1
      > These disposable balloons, while a cute idea, are simply too hobby/garage level.

      Perhaps Google is buying them for some other reason. For example, it sounds like the original company was expecting to produce either very cheap, or very rugged, small cell sites to go up on the balloons for just one day. Either could be useful beyond the announced business model.

  49. no one has posted? by XO · · Score: 1

    No one has posted http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IP_over_Avian_Carriers

    IP over Avian Carriers?

    --
    "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
  50. Succesfull and profitable? YES! by DeftPunk79 · · Score: 1

    What a lot of people are missing is that this is already being done by a company that has a networth of 70+ million, national defense and oil contracts, and rakes in a tidy profit every year. I visited the company in question's corporate site and did some research on them. They recently won contracts from the Air Force that google had also bid on. This is often a catalyst that leads to a large company buying a smaller one. There isn't a lot of evidence for google buying out Space Data. I just wanted to point out that they are already succesfully using weather balloons in the corporate and military sectors this would just be a push to residential uses.