When that happens, you'll still complain about how much you think the battery pack will cost to replace (though you'll use numbers in direct contradiction of the manufacturers estimates). Oh, and you'll complain about the space, size, shape, look, colors, and name of it as well.
We've seen too many "if only" complainers. Every complaint met just creates a new complaint.
I imagine you are referring to the Sony/MS game station outages, but they are overblown by liars. I have a game that requires a PSN login, and it worked fine with the network down. Though any achievements might not count. I'll have to check when the network is back up.
The HTC One M7 doesn't have an SD slot, but the next year's model, the HTX One M8 does. They cut it out to save a little weight, thickness and cost, but found that people wanted it more than they wanted the benefits of not having it. So they "upgraded" the new model with a better camera, CPU, and an expansion slot. The overwhelming majority of phones sold have an SD card slot, though a few of the popular ones don't, but usually only for a side-model, not the actual flagship.
Given that most android devices have expandable (flash) storage, that stat is one of the least interesting ones. RAM is usually (never?) expandable. So it's a more important stat. The important ones were included in the summary, and no errors were made in the summary. Though you assert there was to cover up the error you made.
When I submit articles, I summarize them properly. That's why mine have been rejected every time. Even when the same article was accepted by someone else who submitted it later, with a copy-paste of the first two paragraphs.
Crime is defined by the white people who arrest every black person they see. Any segregated neighborhood will have higher crime for that reason. And they aren't allowed to leave their neighborhood to move into white ones. But it's the black's fault for existing.
Ah yes, the no true protective case scotsman. The phone isn't out, but you object because the case selection is poor. Otterbox said they are making one for it. But like many new phones, the time from announcement to release wasn't enough for everyone to have a case ready
And your comments about the edges are stupid. THey aren't sharp. The reviews all indicate it's easy to hold. I still don't understand why you are going so far out of your way to make up lies about something. It's a phone, why would you hate it so much? It's just a phone.
3GB of RAM is good. 32GB of Flash is good. I don't know of any android devices with more, but you could have more. These days, 1GB is "normal" and 2GB is high-end.
You just demonstrate your lack of knowledge on the subject that you misunderstood the summary (which wasn't wrong, though you asserted it was) But don't let lack of knowledge of the subject stop you from asserting your wrong opinion as truth.
Or are you saying that you'd only accept an otterbox? I saw one officially announcing it, but the Edge isn't fully released. So yes, there aren't 10,000 cases for it.
If one and only one person is convicted, it's "illegal", no matter how many people get away with it. If it's so clear from the supreme court that obscenity is legal, why did Paul Little spend 2 years in jail/prison?
Or if you have heard of "digital zoom", "printing" or can afford $700 or so for a 2560x1600 monitor. Not everything is useless because we have a crappy tablet used as our only/main computer.
Yes, very complex. You don't have the freedom of speech, but believe you do, because you believe in the excuses given for why you don't have freedom of speech. That does make a mess.
As I said. Neither place has "freedom of speech" we just declare the US superior because we claim the qualities we make illegal are more justified in making speech illegal. When obscenity is illegal in the US, then we have no moral high-ground from which to lecture, not that it would stop us from lecturing anyway.
#1 had the stupid ice world monsters. On a planet with no life, there wouldn't be massive animals. And if the bigger creature killed something, it'd likely eat it, not discard the large animal to chase a smaller one. But pointless *chase scene*. And I couldn't watch it without picturing JJ saying "Make the mining ship as scary as possible, I don't care if it's useless as a mining ship. It should be scary, like it's own character. Scarier. More personality and less practical! Muhahahahaha." every time the ship was on the screen, inside or outside shot. The ship being a "character" like JJ makes everything. It made me flash back to Lost, where JJ made a hatch. Yes, a door, unto a character with more back-story and explanation than most of the actors got. Like a big "fuck you" to everyone watching. JJ only does character development for inaninmatte objects. That's why he did Star Trek, because he could ignore the humans, as they had a back-story, and instead make "red matter", the ships, the planets, the tech and other things the characters, and not have to waste any time developing humans.
Does that mean that you should be arrested for saying something unpleasant?
I didn't say anything about intending harm, that's all you.
Oh, so "intending harm" isn't "unpleasant"? Sounds like you said something so general as to be wrong, and when I called you on it, you changed what you said. That's the great thing, I can look back and see that you implied that saying "something unpleasant" shouldn't be arrestable. But never is there a "I misspoke, I meant..." statement, but asserting that I mis-read your plain and direct statement.
The OP suggested that people should get their "head caved in" for saying something disagreeable.
I didn't read it that way. I read it as you should expect to get your head caved in, not that you "should" have that result and it's justified, but that you should expect it.
Funny how those who read the worst, speak the worst, and think it's always everyone else's fault for communicating poorly.
Go read the OP again. Did he say it was justified to get your head caved in, or that you should expect it? Did you imply that someone shouldn't be arrested for saying something "unpleasant"? Is a direct death threat of credible violence "unpleasant"?
The point I was attempting to make is that just because someone is offended by something you say that doesn't mean that they should be criminalized.
I'd assert that's not what you said, even if it was what you were attempting, and that's what I was pointing out.
Same as the US. Obscene is illegal. Obscene is illegal because it's offensive. So "rude" is illegal in the US, same as the UK. But it's funny to see all the Americans assert they have more rights than those in the UK, when the rights are roughly equal, but exercised slightly differently.
I was going through security once, and the TSA agent made a bomb joke to me. I said back "I have a witty retort to that, but if I said it, you might arrest me." He looked very confused, then was a but apologetic about making a joke that I was barred by law from making.
So you think you have the right to say anything you like, even if you intend it to be harmful? Or do you have the right to do anything harmful, so long as the harm isn't both physical and permanent?
Slashdot Mirror
I wanted to try out some of the sites in the list. A few of them have to work still, right?
When that happens, you'll still complain about how much you think the battery pack will cost to replace (though you'll use numbers in direct contradiction of the manufacturers estimates). Oh, and you'll complain about the space, size, shape, look, colors, and name of it as well.
We've seen too many "if only" complainers. Every complaint met just creates a new complaint.
With minor tuning in the suspension, goes away. The balance is so complex that most over-simplify because it's easier.
Watch, or pay for. The fact that your comments seem to support the latter would put them in downmod territory.
I imagine you are referring to the Sony/MS game station outages, but they are overblown by liars. I have a game that requires a PSN login, and it worked fine with the network down. Though any achievements might not count. I'll have to check when the network is back up.
The HTC One M7 doesn't have an SD slot, but the next year's model, the HTX One M8 does. They cut it out to save a little weight, thickness and cost, but found that people wanted it more than they wanted the benefits of not having it. So they "upgraded" the new model with a better camera, CPU, and an expansion slot. The overwhelming majority of phones sold have an SD card slot, though a few of the popular ones don't, but usually only for a side-model, not the actual flagship.
Given that most android devices have expandable (flash) storage, that stat is one of the least interesting ones. RAM is usually (never?) expandable. So it's a more important stat. The important ones were included in the summary, and no errors were made in the summary. Though you assert there was to cover up the error you made.
When I submit articles, I summarize them properly. That's why mine have been rejected every time. Even when the same article was accepted by someone else who submitted it later, with a copy-paste of the first two paragraphs.
Better than that, it was retina.
US citizen in the US at the time. Do you not know what TSA is?
Crime is defined by the white people who arrest every black person they see. Any segregated neighborhood will have higher crime for that reason. And they aren't allowed to leave their neighborhood to move into white ones. But it's the black's fault for existing.
Ah yes, the no true protective case scotsman. The phone isn't out, but you object because the case selection is poor. Otterbox said they are making one for it. But like many new phones, the time from announcement to release wasn't enough for everyone to have a case ready
And your comments about the edges are stupid. THey aren't sharp. The reviews all indicate it's easy to hold. I still don't understand why you are going so far out of your way to make up lies about something. It's a phone, why would you hate it so much? It's just a phone.
3GB of RAM is good. 32GB of Flash is good. I don't know of any android devices with more, but you could have more. These days, 1GB is "normal" and 2GB is high-end.
You just demonstrate your lack of knowledge on the subject that you misunderstood the summary (which wasn't wrong, though you asserted it was) But don't let lack of knowledge of the subject stop you from asserting your wrong opinion as truth.
http://shop.crackberry.com/aqu...
Or are you saying that you'd only accept an otterbox? I saw one officially announcing it, but the Edge isn't fully released. So yes, there aren't 10,000 cases for it.
If one and only one person is convicted, it's "illegal", no matter how many people get away with it. If it's so clear from the supreme court that obscenity is legal, why did Paul Little spend 2 years in jail/prison?
Or if you have heard of "digital zoom", "printing" or can afford $700 or so for a 2560x1600 monitor. Not everything is useless because we have a crappy tablet used as our only/main computer.
can't use a protective case.
lots of cases
can't be held on both sides
http://cdn01.androidauthority....
even easier to crack the screen on than a regular smartphone
A lie to go with the other lies you gave.
Why are you bashing something for being different? None of your complaints are even valid, 2/3 disprovable with simple searches.
Yes, very complex. You don't have the freedom of speech, but believe you do, because you believe in the excuses given for why you don't have freedom of speech. That does make a mess.
The court ruled that the porn was "speech" and held that the obscenity laws were valid enough to convict.
As I said. Neither place has "freedom of speech" we just declare the US superior because we claim the qualities we make illegal are more justified in making speech illegal. When obscenity is illegal in the US, then we have no moral high-ground from which to lecture, not that it would stop us from lecturing anyway.
http://www.tampabay.com/news/c...
Reality proves you wrong. If obscene speech was NOT illegal, then Paul Little wouldn't have been convicted of obscenity.
OR are you arguing that reality is wrong because it contradicts your opinion?
#1 had the stupid ice world monsters. On a planet with no life, there wouldn't be massive animals. And if the bigger creature killed something, it'd likely eat it, not discard the large animal to chase a smaller one. But pointless *chase scene*. And I couldn't watch it without picturing JJ saying "Make the mining ship as scary as possible, I don't care if it's useless as a mining ship. It should be scary, like it's own character. Scarier. More personality and less practical! Muhahahahaha." every time the ship was on the screen, inside or outside shot. The ship being a "character" like JJ makes everything. It made me flash back to Lost, where JJ made a hatch. Yes, a door, unto a character with more back-story and explanation than most of the actors got. Like a big "fuck you" to everyone watching. JJ only does character development for inaninmatte objects. That's why he did Star Trek, because he could ignore the humans, as they had a back-story, and instead make "red matter", the ships, the planets, the tech and other things the characters, and not have to waste any time developing humans.
Does that mean that you should be arrested for saying something unpleasant?
I didn't say anything about intending harm, that's all you.
Oh, so "intending harm" isn't "unpleasant"? Sounds like you said something so general as to be wrong, and when I called you on it, you changed what you said. That's the great thing, I can look back and see that you implied that saying "something unpleasant" shouldn't be arrestable. But never is there a "I misspoke, I meant..." statement, but asserting that I mis-read your plain and direct statement.
The OP suggested that people should get their "head caved in" for saying something disagreeable.
I didn't read it that way. I read it as you should expect to get your head caved in, not that you "should" have that result and it's justified, but that you should expect it.
Funny how those who read the worst, speak the worst, and think it's always everyone else's fault for communicating poorly.
Go read the OP again. Did he say it was justified to get your head caved in, or that you should expect it? Did you imply that someone shouldn't be arrested for saying something "unpleasant"? Is a direct death threat of credible violence "unpleasant"?
The point I was attempting to make is that just because someone is offended by something you say that doesn't mean that they should be criminalized.
I'd assert that's not what you said, even if it was what you were attempting, and that's what I was pointing out.
Same as the US. Obscene is illegal. Obscene is illegal because it's offensive. So "rude" is illegal in the US, same as the UK. But it's funny to see all the Americans assert they have more rights than those in the UK, when the rights are roughly equal, but exercised slightly differently.
I was going through security once, and the TSA agent made a bomb joke to me. I said back "I have a witty retort to that, but if I said it, you might arrest me." He looked very confused, then was a but apologetic about making a joke that I was barred by law from making.
So you think you have the right to say anything you like, even if you intend it to be harmful? Or do you have the right to do anything harmful, so long as the harm isn't both physical and permanent?