People (including children) respond in kind. When you treat an adult like a child, they only respond like a child. But treat a child like an adult, and they respond like an adult.
If you look closely at the two horizontal line keys on your keyboard, the one on the numeric keypad is probably shorter than the one on the left.
They are the same on the keyboard. When printed out in variable-width fonts, they are the same. There are no keys on the keyboard that give different length horizontal lines (other than the underscore is longer than the dash-minus, but not confusable).
Doesn't the dam- ned text get re- flowed by the devi- ce or so- mething? That be- ing said, this is ridi- culous, all my prin- ted books have a few hy- phens, and I've ne- ver had any dif- ficulty rea- ding them. Maybe Ama- zon should just add "don't hyphenate" setting on their reading device and end it once and for all?
What if you are writing about a new thing that you use multiple words to describe The Child-emperor was raised by an adoptive family. Leaving out the hyphens can be confusing. Leaving them in, almost never causes any confusion.
It'd never happen, spending $1T on war gear gets bribe-kick-backs from the makers, and a cash payment to China wouldn't put anything in the pocket of the legislators.
Further, we can't topple the DPRK without pissing off China and suffering severe consequences.
Sure we could. Ask China what cash payment they'd like. The cost of paying off China in cash is much cheaper than a war (economic or military) with or through them. China has a problem because they expect DPRK refugees to run north, not south.
AAA uses diamonds. Everyone else in the world uses stars. Including Michelin. And Michelin stars pre-date AAA, so perhaps AAA deliberately picked diamonds to not be confused with the previous guides available elsewhere.
It'll still know. It'll see that there's a wireless client that thinks it's connected to the hotel SSID, but isn't. THey can identify the rogue that way, without needing to know the AP's MAC, but they'll have that anyway, and will interfere with anyone connected to it.
But they aren't interfering with the wireless signal, but performing an illegal MITM attack. They want the FCC to rule their illegal MITM attack to be legal, for when someone eventually challenges it in court as "unauthorized access" to a user's computer, a federal felony.
Nope. Part of WiFi is CS/MACA. Your suggestion breaks WiFi, and it becomes a jammer with an interesting jamming pattern. WiFi requires Collision Sensing (you don't transmit if someone else is), and Collision Avoidance. Both of those don't exist in your plan.
The star ratings are based on available services, not included services. So same-day dry cleaning at $500 per item (collected from your room) will count towards a star rating, but having the dry-cleaners come and pick it up from you and drop it off same-day doesn't, because it's not a seamless bill-to-the-room service.
The star ratings should be abolished and re-made to measure value, not just insulation from the world. A 5-star is one where you pay a single bill when you leave, but could live there indefinitely with no loss of quality of life for a bilionaire. That's not what 99.9% of the travelers care about. I stayed at a "real" 5-star once. It was super-expensive to do anything, but there's nothing you couldn't get or do.
why would you need to be windowless? The "early" commercial thermal windows were great at blocking wireless. If they actually tried to do it, I'm sure they could improve on that.
I've seen foil-backed insulation used between inside walls in hotels. Helps cut sound transmission, as well as increase thermal insulation. It may have been mylar, rather than metal-based, but it looked the same, and either would serve the same purpose. Only the material choice would be different.
How would that be illegal? If it were, I've been in a number of "illegal" underground parking garages. Every "passive" blocking mechanism I've seen violates no laws or rules. You must not "interfere"or transmit in the restricted ranges, but blocking is perfectly fine.
"wit-chew" is an accepted, though not strictly correct, pronunciation of "with you". I understand all the people who don't like it, but that doesn't mean it isn't English.
Typing the boat up is something that they'd claim you had responsibilit of, regardless of how well you did or think you did. The way it'd not be "your fault" is if you had a recent receipt for a new rope (of the appropriate dimensions) and that was found sheared at the site. It failed, or someone cut it. And if you can prove it wasn't you who cut it, then it'd be covered as if there were witnesses that lightning struck it, or there's video evidence that Donald Trump walked past and cut the line for the lols.
God you are a dumbfuck. Every single point you make is premised on a black and white world.
And it appears that you are arguing because you don't like me, not because you have something to say.
Actually I minored in biology,
And biology explained that "wet nurses" have been around for longer than recorded history? Because society creates answers to biological problems. You might know the problem, but that doesn't mean you've heard of the common answer, used thousands of years ago (and before). Or, to call on your *vast* knowledge as a biology minor, how many babies can one lactating woman sustain? That'll be your limit. But it's obvious from your posts you haven't looked at this on a biological level, but don't like the societal answer I gave, and are twisting it to meet your personal agenda, upset that I know more biology and history than you.
Official enough, yet, apparently useless. That's apparently US-only, and despite SOA ostensibly being international, every event and office they have is in the US or Canada. When you can use that to compare US and Liberia, then it will meet the requirements I stated. Or are you saying that the table you gave applies to every country in the world? Or it's useless (when you exclude all natural and unnatural causes of death, we expect an 18 year old male will live another 63 years). The table just says "you'll live to 80-85, unless you are older than 72 when you ask the question, so long as you never get sick or injured." Again, not holding useful information to people, just insurers
Thats' why the GPS the car uses should take weather and mountain passes into consideration, and refuse to leave the garage if the weather conditions outside are unsafe at any speed.
The only failure I've ever seen anyone focus on with self-driving cars is where the user makes multiple errors "urging" a car into a known unsafe area. The "fix" to that is to remove more power from the driver. If "I'm sorry Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that." were the response to all the stupid human requests, then 99% of complaints against driverless cars would be invalid. Is that really the reality you want to push for?
Slashdot Mirror
Which basically means it's a "nicer" definition to make people feel better about the fact that they cannot properly enunciate their words.
Or a racist elitist practice to give "official" backing to belittling anyone "different".
Reviews should be hidden for A/Cs. A/C's opinion is worth less than a human's.
I liked 6. Was a big improvement over 4 and 5.
People (including children) respond in kind. When you treat an adult like a child, they only respond like a child. But treat a child like an adult, and they respond like an adult.
If you look closely at the two horizontal line keys on your keyboard, the one on the numeric keypad is probably shorter than the one on the left.
They are the same on the keyboard. When printed out in variable-width fonts, they are the same. There are no keys on the keyboard that give different length horizontal lines (other than the underscore is longer than the dash-minus, but not confusable).
The key is a "minus" key, labelled with a "minus" sign,
Mine is an underscore, lined up poorly. On the same key as the underscore.
Doesn't the dam-
ned text get re-
flowed by the devi-
ce or so-
mething? That be-
ing said, this is ridi-
culous, all my prin-
ted books have a few hy-
phens, and I've ne-
ver had any dif-
ficulty rea-
ding them. Maybe Ama-
zon should just add "don't hyphenate" setting on their reading device and end it once and for all?
What if you are writing about a new thing that you use multiple words to describe The Child-emperor was raised by an adoptive family. Leaving out the hyphens can be confusing. Leaving them in, almost never causes any confusion.
It'd never happen, spending $1T on war gear gets bribe-kick-backs from the makers, and a cash payment to China wouldn't put anything in the pocket of the legislators.
Further, we can't topple the DPRK without pissing off China and suffering severe consequences.
Sure we could. Ask China what cash payment they'd like. The cost of paying off China in cash is much cheaper than a war (economic or military) with or through them. China has a problem because they expect DPRK refugees to run north, not south.
No, the Republicans wanted it pulled, but wanted to make sure to publicly come out against pulling it before it was pulled.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H...
AAA uses diamonds. Everyone else in the world uses stars. Including Michelin. And Michelin stars pre-date AAA, so perhaps AAA deliberately picked diamonds to not be confused with the previous guides available elsewhere.
It'll still know. It'll see that there's a wireless client that thinks it's connected to the hotel SSID, but isn't. THey can identify the rogue that way, without needing to know the AP's MAC, but they'll have that anyway, and will interfere with anyone connected to it.
But they aren't interfering with the wireless signal, but performing an illegal MITM attack. They want the FCC to rule their illegal MITM attack to be legal, for when someone eventually challenges it in court as "unauthorized access" to a user's computer, a federal felony.
Reality disagrees with your assessment.
Nope. Part of WiFi is CS/MACA. Your suggestion breaks WiFi, and it becomes a jammer with an interesting jamming pattern. WiFi requires Collision Sensing (you don't transmit if someone else is), and Collision Avoidance. Both of those don't exist in your plan.
The star ratings are based on available services, not included services. So same-day dry cleaning at $500 per item (collected from your room) will count towards a star rating, but having the dry-cleaners come and pick it up from you and drop it off same-day doesn't, because it's not a seamless bill-to-the-room service.
The star ratings should be abolished and re-made to measure value, not just insulation from the world. A 5-star is one where you pay a single bill when you leave, but could live there indefinitely with no loss of quality of life for a bilionaire. That's not what 99.9% of the travelers care about. I stayed at a "real" 5-star once. It was super-expensive to do anything, but there's nothing you couldn't get or do.
I don't want to sit next to the guy who brought in snakes and beer.
why would you need to be windowless? The "early" commercial thermal windows were great at blocking wireless. If they actually tried to do it, I'm sure they could improve on that.
I've seen foil-backed insulation used between inside walls in hotels. Helps cut sound transmission, as well as increase thermal insulation. It may have been mylar, rather than metal-based, but it looked the same, and either would serve the same purpose. Only the material choice would be different.
How would that be illegal? If it were, I've been in a number of "illegal" underground parking garages. Every "passive" blocking mechanism I've seen violates no laws or rules. You must not "interfere"or transmit in the restricted ranges, but blocking is perfectly fine.
"wit-chew" is an accepted, though not strictly correct, pronunciation of "with you". I understand all the people who don't like it, but that doesn't mean it isn't English.
Typing the boat up is something that they'd claim you had responsibilit of, regardless of how well you did or think you did. The way it'd not be "your fault" is if you had a recent receipt for a new rope (of the appropriate dimensions) and that was found sheared at the site. It failed, or someone cut it. And if you can prove it wasn't you who cut it, then it'd be covered as if there were witnesses that lightning struck it, or there's video evidence that Donald Trump walked past and cut the line for the lols.
God you are a dumbfuck. Every single point you make is premised on a black and white world.
And it appears that you are arguing because you don't like me, not because you have something to say.
Actually I minored in biology,
And biology explained that "wet nurses" have been around for longer than recorded history? Because society creates answers to biological problems. You might know the problem, but that doesn't mean you've heard of the common answer, used thousands of years ago (and before). Or, to call on your *vast* knowledge as a biology minor, how many babies can one lactating woman sustain? That'll be your limit. But it's obvious from your posts you haven't looked at this on a biological level, but don't like the societal answer I gave, and are twisting it to meet your personal agenda, upset that I know more biology and history than you.
Official enough, yet, apparently useless. That's apparently US-only, and despite SOA ostensibly being international, every event and office they have is in the US or Canada. When you can use that to compare US and Liberia, then it will meet the requirements I stated. Or are you saying that the table you gave applies to every country in the world? Or it's useless (when you exclude all natural and unnatural causes of death, we expect an 18 year old male will live another 63 years). The table just says "you'll live to 80-85, unless you are older than 72 when you ask the question, so long as you never get sick or injured." Again, not holding useful information to people, just insurers
Thats' why the GPS the car uses should take weather and mountain passes into consideration, and refuse to leave the garage if the weather conditions outside are unsafe at any speed.
The only failure I've ever seen anyone focus on with self-driving cars is where the user makes multiple errors "urging" a car into a known unsafe area. The "fix" to that is to remove more power from the driver. If "I'm sorry Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that." were the response to all the stupid human requests, then 99% of complaints against driverless cars would be invalid. Is that really the reality you want to push for?