Rent will always inflate because nearly everywhere has net population growth. There's nothing that ties that to UBI. UBI won't change rents significantly. If you don't have a job because you can live on UBI, then when your rent goes from $1000 to $2000, you move to a cheaper suburb/city. Also, rent is only one factor in inflation, and the other parts have been dropping (pretty much everything except rent and power, with food going up with power, as that's a cost in producing food). So net inflation would be going up anyway, and will still with a UBI, but not because the UBI is the primary cause.
Nope. That's not how inflation works. Inflation is tied to money supply, not average wage. That those correlate confuses people. But you have lost the causality.
You can hook up an external screen if you really want. But my 17.3" screen is not bad, for a laptop, though a downgrade from my 18.3 I had before. The 18.3 must not have sold well, it wasn't available when I went shopping. It also has more power than the average system, and if I hooked it up to a screen, keyboard and mouse, you wouldn't know it wasn't a low profile machine. So why the laptop hate?
Then, by your definition, we've had "flying cars" since the '60s. I know of more than one airport community, where people commute to the airport in their airplane, then take off from there. It's illegal, but unenforced, so meets all your definitions. The new ones are just a little more flexible, but otherwise a 50+ year old idea (that's been done for those 50+ years, not just an idea).
There are flying cars. Just like there are segways, despite it being illegal to use them in many cities.
Segways are generally legal, not generally illegal. Without specific reason to treat them otherwise, they fall into the category of "bicycle" (or at worst "powered bicycle").And those are allowed or not allowed under a wide range of laws. That a few places where they fall under laws closer to motorcycles complain quite loudly doesn't mean there are "many" places they are illegal. Just that the places they are are full of loud complainers.
The average speed of a car in London is less than the average speed of an unimpeded walker.
The studies also show that you can't reduce the number of cars on a road. You can charge them more, but they don't go away. The only proven way to reduce cars is slow them down. When you average speed gets below a brisk walk, people start walking.
The problem with transportation systems is that those running it fight to make cars travel faster, and don't focus on alternatives. If people had alternatives they like, they'd take them. Most people won't take the bus. They are slow, noxious, and full of unknown people. Trains are better. They are less noxious, and faster. When I was in DC, I found that almost nobody would take a bus to a train, then a bus to the final destination. That would be "quicker" for many routes, but people would instead choose to bus the whole way, if it reduced transfers.
But I'd like to say units in this case make a lot of difference. Some guy above said 20 mph was not enough for him. He's probably an athlete and bicycle lanes are not for racing.
Nope. Being in a place with hills, 20 mph is way too low. Yesterday I was in the car, going 50k in a 50k zone. Was passed by a (looked like) 12 year old on a 20" bike. Of course this was down a steep-ish hill. With hills, you go 10k up and 40k+ down. A slow speed limit will force you to touch your brakes on the way down, and that's a lot of wasted energy on a human-powered bike. 20mph would be fine for a flat country for commuting, and putting around, but insufficient if the desire is for people training on bikes to stay off the roads. 20mph is not a bad average speed, but averages aren't followed in practice, unless the roads are flat, and they aren't flat in most places.
Your stupid argument is that a car isn't a car without doors. They are irrelevant to the nature of it, but almost all have it. voice and video recognition is solved anyway. Kinect does it as well as any AI needs. Plugging a Kinect into an AI is no more trouble than plugging in a keyboard. So I don't see what voice and video recognition has to do with AI. They are orthoginal, even if you'll find most AIs will have it.
None of that matters. The maker of the item, or the seller of it is 100% responsible. Their internal bickering (and yes, bickering with an external supplier is an internal bicker, in matters of law) won't change that.
It's a simple and quite settled point of law.
Drivers for a 3rd party video card is a separate thing. You don't buy your car and your engine separately. Nobody ever runs around with a "broken" computer. It works 100%, you just have to wipe it and try again, perhaps after removing unapproved 3rd party hardware. You are extrapolating your irrelevant experiences and coming to an incorrect guess.
I've had a friend ticketed for going 60 in a 55, and for riding a bike on a highway (at the same time, so one ticket for being too fast, and one for being too slow). Drafting and hills allows someone to achieve high speeds on a bike. What happens in Belgium is that motorized bikes are allowed on the bike paths. So mopeds, small motorcycles, and electric bikes share the same paths with pedal-bikes. Works fine, and gets more people off the roads.
In the US, there's such a Trump factor in drivers that they'll vote in measures to hurt cyclists because they perceive an unfair advantage, when helping cyclists would get more people off the roads. Hatred of a class of citizens (cyclists) causes people to vote against their own self interest. Because of all the hateful people, I wouldn't be surprised if Trump wins.
They are all already in your cars. That you are too dumb to figure out that it isn't MS that gets sued, but Ford, or whoever puts it in their car that gets sued doesn't mean it's a hard question. And if you use MS and it's found to be an MS fault, you can on-sue them (or charge them, as per your contract). With Linux, you use that possibility of liability shield, so Linux is used less, though it still shows up some.
These are simple legal concepts that have been settled for nearly 100 years. They aren't new. And they aren't changing (unless the laws change, and they aren't changing fast for self-drivers).
The general concept is 100% the same. The physics details change slightly because of the nano scale. "flat lense" is old. "flat lense with nano" is the same thing, but different.
Cameras have used Fresnel lenses. Manufacturing quality was one of the biggest problems with them, but with nano, it seems they got rid of that problem, so the lense is thin, and optical quality, but still the same basic optics solved hundreds of years ago.
We are no closer to AI now than we were 70 years ago. All we have now is better dB lookups. *yawn*. Call me when someone creates an approach that has a possibility of creating AI.
Ah, so he didn't sell "handmade" objects, but cheap Chinese imports that were assembly-line made. That would do it. Selling imported shit with 10,000% markup has been killed by the Internet. All the shops where they sell items made by a single human (usually someone local) are thriving, even doing better with the Internet. Even if the shop itself doesn't have an Internet presence, there'll be Yelps and such on them that will boost business.
But yes, shops that sold nothing but factory-made imports at massive markups are failing. And nothing of value was lost.
Slashdot Mirror
Nothing, but that's not how it works. Rent won't go up that high or that fast.
Rent will always inflate because nearly everywhere has net population growth. There's nothing that ties that to UBI. UBI won't change rents significantly. If you don't have a job because you can live on UBI, then when your rent goes from $1000 to $2000, you move to a cheaper suburb/city. Also, rent is only one factor in inflation, and the other parts have been dropping (pretty much everything except rent and power, with food going up with power, as that's a cost in producing food). So net inflation would be going up anyway, and will still with a UBI, but not because the UBI is the primary cause.
Nope. That's not how inflation works. Inflation is tied to money supply, not average wage. That those correlate confuses people. But you have lost the causality.
You can hook up an external screen if you really want. But my 17.3" screen is not bad, for a laptop, though a downgrade from my 18.3 I had before. The 18.3 must not have sold well, it wasn't available when I went shopping. It also has more power than the average system, and if I hooked it up to a screen, keyboard and mouse, you wouldn't know it wasn't a low profile machine. So why the laptop hate?
There are flying cars. Just like there are segways, despite it being illegal to use them in many cities.
Segways are generally legal, not generally illegal. Without specific reason to treat them otherwise, they fall into the category of "bicycle" (or at worst "powered bicycle").And those are allowed or not allowed under a wide range of laws. That a few places where they fall under laws closer to motorcycles complain quite loudly doesn't mean there are "many" places they are illegal. Just that the places they are are full of loud complainers.
The studies also show that you can't reduce the number of cars on a road. You can charge them more, but they don't go away. The only proven way to reduce cars is slow them down. When you average speed gets below a brisk walk, people start walking.
The problem with transportation systems is that those running it fight to make cars travel faster, and don't focus on alternatives. If people had alternatives they like, they'd take them. Most people won't take the bus. They are slow, noxious, and full of unknown people. Trains are better. They are less noxious, and faster. When I was in DC, I found that almost nobody would take a bus to a train, then a bus to the final destination. That would be "quicker" for many routes, but people would instead choose to bus the whole way, if it reduced transfers.
But I'd like to say units in this case make a lot of difference. Some guy above said 20 mph was not enough for him. He's probably an athlete and bicycle lanes are not for racing.
Nope. Being in a place with hills, 20 mph is way too low. Yesterday I was in the car, going 50k in a 50k zone. Was passed by a (looked like) 12 year old on a 20" bike. Of course this was down a steep-ish hill. With hills, you go 10k up and 40k+ down. A slow speed limit will force you to touch your brakes on the way down, and that's a lot of wasted energy on a human-powered bike. 20mph would be fine for a flat country for commuting, and putting around, but insufficient if the desire is for people training on bikes to stay off the roads. 20mph is not a bad average speed, but averages aren't followed in practice, unless the roads are flat, and they aren't flat in most places.
Are they allowed? The places I've been in Europe with full bike paths, also had footpaths parallel. There'd be no reason to use the footpath.
That incident was in mph in the US. No need to specify units, the point is the same whether the speeds were 60 in a 55 or 100 in a 90.
Adobe doesn't make cars. Context matters.
Your stupid argument is that a car isn't a car without doors. They are irrelevant to the nature of it, but almost all have it. voice and video recognition is solved anyway. Kinect does it as well as any AI needs. Plugging a Kinect into an AI is no more trouble than plugging in a keyboard. So I don't see what voice and video recognition has to do with AI. They are orthoginal, even if you'll find most AIs will have it.
How much longer do you have on your sentence for assault?
Since you can't grasp simple English:
None of that matters. The maker of the item, or the seller of it is 100% responsible. Their internal bickering (and yes, bickering with an external supplier is an internal bicker, in matters of law) won't change that.
It's a simple and quite settled point of law.
Drivers for a 3rd party video card is a separate thing. You don't buy your car and your engine separately. Nobody ever runs around with a "broken" computer. It works 100%, you just have to wipe it and try again, perhaps after removing unapproved 3rd party hardware. You are extrapolating your irrelevant experiences and coming to an incorrect guess.
Did that, 10 miles a day, 100 days. No real issues.
I've had a friend ticketed for going 60 in a 55, and for riding a bike on a highway (at the same time, so one ticket for being too fast, and one for being too slow). Drafting and hills allows someone to achieve high speeds on a bike. What happens in Belgium is that motorized bikes are allowed on the bike paths. So mopeds, small motorcycles, and electric bikes share the same paths with pedal-bikes. Works fine, and gets more people off the roads.
In the US, there's such a Trump factor in drivers that they'll vote in measures to hurt cyclists because they perceive an unfair advantage, when helping cyclists would get more people off the roads. Hatred of a class of citizens (cyclists) causes people to vote against their own self interest. Because of all the hateful people, I wouldn't be surprised if Trump wins.
They are all already in your cars. That you are too dumb to figure out that it isn't MS that gets sued, but Ford, or whoever puts it in their car that gets sued doesn't mean it's a hard question. And if you use MS and it's found to be an MS fault, you can on-sue them (or charge them, as per your contract). With Linux, you use that possibility of liability shield, so Linux is used less, though it still shows up some.
These are simple legal concepts that have been settled for nearly 100 years. They aren't new. And they aren't changing (unless the laws change, and they aren't changing fast for self-drivers).
Why is this asked every time?
If it's a defect, it's the fault of the manufacturer. If it's user error, it's fault of the user/owner. It's not hard.
AI doesn't need to hear or see. At least until the Turing test is only given orally, or via ASL.
The general concept is 100% the same. The physics details change slightly because of the nano scale. "flat lense" is old. "flat lense with nano" is the same thing, but different.
That's exactly the definition of a Fresnel lense. They did it with slanted material because that's all they had.
Cameras have used Fresnel lenses. Manufacturing quality was one of the biggest problems with them, but with nano, it seems they got rid of that problem, so the lense is thin, and optical quality, but still the same basic optics solved hundreds of years ago.
Google is a better AI than Siri. Siri just gets mention because it's voice, which is unrelated to AI.
Left in the hands of private industry, and all we get is faster dB queries and Siri.
Yup. Came here to say that. Someone re-re-invented a 300 year old Fresnel lense.
We are no closer to AI now than we were 70 years ago. All we have now is better dB lookups. *yawn*. Call me when someone creates an approach that has a possibility of creating AI.
Ah, so he didn't sell "handmade" objects, but cheap Chinese imports that were assembly-line made. That would do it. Selling imported shit with 10,000% markup has been killed by the Internet. All the shops where they sell items made by a single human (usually someone local) are thriving, even doing better with the Internet. Even if the shop itself doesn't have an Internet presence, there'll be Yelps and such on them that will boost business.
But yes, shops that sold nothing but factory-made imports at massive markups are failing. And nothing of value was lost.