Not only that, But they was massive layoffs in China recently and the most efficient way to deal with it would be conscription into military service and a war that thinned the population out.
If North Korea provoked China, it might be the end of N.K.
Trump makes sense to everyone who thinks the government is out for themselves at the expense of the people. He makes sense to people who do not like jobs going over seas- even when they remain in America (did you train your H1B replacement yet? ). He makes sense to a lot of people who seem to have been burned by the "establishment" who do whatever they want and to hell with what the people want.
That might very well be a third of the population. I think it is more considering Bernie's success. You call it retarded bigots, I call it a big problem. I'm also betting that you are part of what they see as the problem.
This is the justice department doing this. It's head is appointed by Obama who is a democrat. Ideally the justice department is not political in operation but you cannot claim republican conspiracy on this. Any attempt to do so would be little more than a distraction from the truth.
Classified is both a designation for identifying classified materials and a classification of the materials itself. Classified is one of the lower ranked classifications where there are classifications levels beyond that which require special handling and limits who can see or use and for what reason.
You need to cite that. Everything I can find says ISIS grew out of Jama'at al-Tawhid wal-Jihad which started in 1999 and was only allied with al qeada.
The rest of your reply is about as silly. A grown person makes their own decisions.
Assad is still in power. Err did you think ISIS started in Iraq? Even then, they didn't hold ground in Iraq until we left. So I'm not sure what removing a government had anything to do with it other than leaving before the replacement government would function better.
Let me ask you something. Suppose a kid grows up to rob banks and kills someone in the process. Do you blame his parents? Do you blame his grandparents?
What you said didn't make much sense. Regardless if the war was irresponsible to start or not?, ISIS didn't have the control in Iraq until after Obama pulled the troops out. And to that point, it still doesn't make much sense because ISIS grew out of Syria's civil war that we largely sat on our hands about verbally bashing Assad saying he had to go while encouraging the rebellion.
You can say ISIS is in Iraq because we left to soon, but you cannot legitimately claim that ISIS is a product of entering the war.
Not really. . It will likely give them a fingerprint or signature of sorts that they can later use to identify you if you hack something they don't like.
What? Are you seriously upset because you are limited in pushing gay propaganda onto children with these restrictions?
Over 90% of the world is not gay. If you think the real world is hetero propaganda I think you might have issues that need professional help. How about we not label it at all and if either show up in search results we just call it normal family relationships?
BTW, most hetero family propaganda i can think of (movies about family and such ) tend to be dysfunctional. I'm not sure you have to fear that they will turn people not gay.
Probably the manpower needed to segregate the sites and the objections of the employees who would need to do it. I'm sure some is automated but I doubt the AI is capable of catching everything.
How about just treating them like humans and skip the labels so eventually there is no more difference than us or your parents or your neighbors or whatever else is normal? Why do we have to label when it comes to children? I think that just teaches them something is different - not normal.
So if innocently some men marry men an so on, why does it need to be labeled for children? It would seem to me that if it is natural, presenting it as natural instead of labeling it would be the proper form of presentation.
Do you really think complex regulation allows corporations to not sail as close as possible to legalities?
If anything it allows them to avoid the spirit of laws and exploit the complexities in ways largely unavailable to firms not already entrenched. Regulation should be succinct and clear as possible to not create undue burdens while still achieving the goals intended.
Oh, I'm not against regulation, I'm against over regulation.
Rarely have I seen a post use so many words to say so little. You must really be proud of yourself for the nothing you added to this conversation. Perhaps if you focused on the topic instead of my moniker you wouldn't come off as densely as you think I am.
Slashdot Mirror
Political in a general sense maybe but it transcends or it is supposed to transcend party politics on the national level.
Both Clintons too.
A nuke deal was reached under Bill's presidency too. It too was violated even though it was under the former leader.
Deals may not be possible with North Korea. At least long term ones.
Not only that, But they was massive layoffs in China recently and the most efficient way to deal with it would be conscription into military service and a war that thinned the population out.
If North Korea provoked China, it might be the end of N.K.
Trump makes sense to everyone who thinks the government is out for themselves at the expense of the people. He makes sense to people who do not like jobs going over seas- even when they remain in America (did you train your H1B replacement yet? ). He makes sense to a lot of people who seem to have been burned by the "establishment" who do whatever they want and to hell with what the people want.
That might very well be a third of the population. I think it is more considering Bernie's success. You call it retarded bigots, I call it a big problem. I'm also betting that you are part of what they see as the problem.
This is the justice department doing this. It's head is appointed by Obama who is a democrat. Ideally the justice department is not political in operation but you cannot claim republican conspiracy on this. Any attempt to do so would be little more than a distraction from the truth.
Classified is both a designation for identifying classified materials and a classification of the materials itself. Classified is one of the lower ranked classifications where there are classifications levels beyond that which require special handling and limits who can see or use and for what reason.
Syria?
Actually the origin was Jordan and moved to Iraq after the founder was injured in Afghanistan and got treatment in Iraq.
You need to cite that. Everything I can find says ISIS grew out of Jama'at al-Tawhid wal-Jihad which started in 1999 and was only allied with al qeada.
The rest of your reply is about as silly. A grown person makes their own decisions.
ISIS and al qeada are competitors. There is no evolution there other than members of one are now in the other.
Assad is still in power. Err did you think ISIS started in Iraq? Even then, they didn't hold ground in Iraq until we left. So I'm not sure what removing a government had anything to do with it other than leaving before the replacement government would function better.
Let me ask you something. Suppose a kid grows up to rob banks and kills someone in the process. Do you blame his parents? Do you blame his grandparents?
What you said didn't make much sense. Regardless if the war was irresponsible to start or not?, ISIS didn't have the control in Iraq until after Obama pulled the troops out. And to that point, it still doesn't make much sense because ISIS grew out of Syria's civil war that we largely sat on our hands about verbally bashing Assad saying he had to go while encouraging the rebellion.
You can say ISIS is in Iraq because we left to soon, but you cannot legitimately claim that ISIS is a product of entering the war.
Not really. . It will likely give them a fingerprint or signature of sorts that they can later use to identify you if you hack something they don't like.
Sounds way too sketchy to me.
What? Are you seriously upset because you are limited in pushing gay propaganda onto children with these restrictions?
Over 90% of the world is not gay. If you think the real world is hetero propaganda I think you might have issues that need professional help. How about we not label it at all and if either show up in search results we just call it normal family relationships?
BTW, most hetero family propaganda i can think of (movies about family and such ) tend to be dysfunctional. I'm not sure you have to fear that they will turn people not gay.
Perhaps limiting the search terms is a way to make it realistically possible to filter the porn.
Probably the manpower needed to segregate the sites and the objections of the employees who would need to do it. I'm sure some is automated but I doubt the AI is capable of catching everything.
You do realize that the Matthew Shepard story is about a drug deal gone bad and not gay bashing like it was presented right?
So then blocking the terms is appropriate? I mean if they cannot use them, they cannot find the haters about it.
How about just treating them like humans and skip the labels so eventually there is no more difference than us or your parents or your neighbors or whatever else is normal? Why do we have to label when it comes to children? I think that just teaches them something is different - not normal.
Is it? What I'm asking is if it is natural then why does it need to be labeled a special kind of marriage.
So if innocently some men marry men an so on, why does it need to be labeled for children? It would seem to me that if it is natural, presenting it as natural instead of labeling it would be the proper form of presentation.
This is geared towards kids. Please tell me what neccesity is there for kids to be exposed to sexual preferences before they are even sexually aware?
Do you really think complex regulation allows corporations to not sail as close as possible to legalities?
If anything it allows them to avoid the spirit of laws and exploit the complexities in ways largely unavailable to firms not already entrenched. Regulation should be succinct and clear as possible to not create undue burdens while still achieving the goals intended.
Oh, I'm not against regulation, I'm against over regulation.
Rarely have I seen a post use so many words to say so little. You must really be proud of yourself for the nothing you added to this conversation. Perhaps if you focused on the topic instead of my moniker you wouldn't come off as densely as you think I am.
It is over regulation and you are a complete fool if you think starting a trade war is a viable alternative.
Sigh.. reading comprehension is not your strong point is it?