It all depends on if holder has the legal authority to alter the program in such ways. If he does, they just ignore it. If he doesn't they create a law that does what happened and take credit for it. If the president vetos the law, they give holder credit for working with them and doing the right thing and bash Obama for going against the will of yhe people that even departments under him already recognize.
Getting the word out at how this is abused will cause the same reaction from many more people who will do the same with writing their representatives and so on. It will not be over night but it will make a difference.
is there a legal difference between someone pushing another person in front of a bus verses telling them to go ahead and cross the street as a bus is coming? What if I honestly didn't see the bus when they waved the camera around? How would anyone know the difference.
Who is this we? None of us (you, me, them, us) will be around when what you describe happens. And while it will be different when it does happen, it isn't like it will happen over night and the world will adjust to it as it is happening so it's not entirely likely to play out as you think it might.
So, every single regulation, every measured quantity that is subject to limitations, has to be approved by Congress?
Yes, That is unless you want an unconstitutional government who disregards the constitution whenever it feels it can or wants to.
That won't work, and that's why we have an executive branch of government to implement what the Congress passes. Congress passed a law saying 'EPA should regulate this stuff' and that's what the EPA is doing.
The EPA can just as easily propose laws for congress to vote on and pass. But the EPA, just like several other agencies, is independent of the executive and the executive branch is not supposed to be dictating political goals to it.
But i guess ignoring the constitution is perfectly fine with some people. They do not care that the NSA is spying on everyone, that cops are stopping and frisking people for no more of a crime than standing on a street corner or even worse, doing so while black. They do not care that the administration is executing US citizens with drones without any judicial oversight, due process, or constitutional protections. They do not care that we torture people to validate or invalidate information.
So, are you among those people? Or are you with a different group? because if you do care about those things, you should also care about all aspects of the US constitution.
That is unless the petals failed to deploy because of a rough landing and something broke.
I'm inclined to think the parachute was more or less to orient the craft in a certain position so the other portions of the landing would work correctly. But then again, at the speeds it would have been traveling, slowing it a bit might have been a purpose too.
What if the check was in the mail and the dog did eat your homework because you got pizza grease all over it and he loves pizza too?
Or would you prefer reading about how a security patch made your think you were fixed but wasn't or even how it bricked your system because instead of a few more weeks to get it right, they have to rush it out?
Thats like saying if you drive fast your a racist. The guy never said anything about scienc. He said it is about control and mentioned another buzz word as the same
Incorect.. global warming is a generic term that encompasses the scientific phenomonom as well as the political solutions and probably a few more things.
The GP was correct and the no true scottsman arguments in order to slander his opinion just fails.
Sigh.. i read the article and understand it perfectly well. It is you who seems to be willfuly ignoring things in order to push a point of view.
All they will do is gather evidence and issue thousands of fines at once instead of as they find them. If they arent careful, they will classify Uber as a criminal organization and start siezing funds, arresting drivers for felonies, and even if uber can beat it in court, the government is above the law do lite to nothing will stol it
I do not see where he was denying anythng. Perhaps you are confused and think that anyone who does not toe a line in the most favorable way possible for the position you hold dear equates to denialism. But reality works differently. Nothing he said was untrue. Both are a lot about control.
Actually, copyright laws do say something about public performances. That is a lot different than what you are attempting to claim.
But if history has showed us anything, it is that governments and government entities are above the law. It doesn't really matter what term and conditions you set. The only people who can prosecute is the government. Thats like expecting you to citizens arrest yourself for that one time you blew through a stop sign. Aint gonna happen.
Just because the EPA would be killed off does not mean that environmental protections would disappear. What is would mean is that congress would actually have to follow the constitution and vote on them, pass them into law, and either get a president to sign them or override his veto.
The problem with the EPA is that it isn't easily answerable to anyone and makes regulation with the force of law without any constitutional oversight.
Actually, congress unconstitutionally abdicated their duties to the EPA in consideration of it's mandate. We now have a generic law that says it is illegal to not obey regulations put in place by a non-constitutional and non-elected bureaucracy giving them the ability to make law on a whim without any constitutional input in most cases.
As the head of the executive, he can order them to create these regulations independent of congress. In doing so, I'm betting this will also finally trigger the court cases that make this system officially unconstitutional.
Wow.. He asked that you watch the video first because the math works out and you ignore it all and go straight for the character assassination as if it is some magic bullet that dismisses all.
I guess I'm going to have to watch the video now. Obviously there is something factual since your rebuttal to it is rooted in someone being a "denier". If I had mod point, I would mod you interesting too. But maybe not for the same reasons other did.
Dude, don't you remember the di-hydrogen monoxide debacle in the 90's by some county government in California? And yes, they have been regulating it ever since. Half the west coast is in a drought because they are reserving most of the water normally pumped there for irrigation so they have enough to cool the new NSA super computer and spy central building in Utah.
The problem with calling the boundary disputes and prohibition on slavery for new states if that it is not an existing territory and does not favor one party over another. We do not have states that look like pentagrams with Star of David on each point in order to favor a party at one time. What we had was more of a policy push than gerrymandering.
But as I said, even if it somehow can be construed as such, the point is moot due to how the senate was selected at the time.
Basically, with varying degress of success, a microphpne recording you typing and some software can decode your keystrokes on a wired keyboad. I'm waiting on someone to perfect the van eck effect/phreaking.. although i think that was limited to CTR monitors. Its been a while since i looked at either.
Obviously you have not been paying attention. I'm also not sure if you understand the constitution or the founding of the country. Here is a hint, you cannot live up to something when you ignore that something in order to have the activities in which you expect them to achive ehile they live up to. Its no wonder the government thinks it can spy on everyone, lock them up without due process, search you for nothing more than being black and in public, and just kill citizans withou due process.
Slashdot Mirror
Not really a masterful move.
It all depends on if holder has the legal authority to alter the program in such ways. If he does, they just ignore it. If he doesn't they create a law that does what happened and take credit for it. If the president vetos the law, they give holder credit for working with them and doing the right thing and bash Obama for going against the will of yhe people that even departments under him already recognize.
Well, you can do more than that and you just did.
Getting the word out at how this is abused will cause the same reaction from many more people who will do the same with writing their representatives and so on. It will not be over night but it will make a difference.
I was sort of wondering the same thing.
is there a legal difference between someone pushing another person in front of a bus verses telling them to go ahead and cross the street as a bus is coming? What if I honestly didn't see the bus when they waved the camera around? How would anyone know the difference.
Well, some people have been saying spammers are terrorist for a long time. Turns out they might be after all.
Well, considering that terrorist like boko haram are kidnapping girls and selling them as slaves, you might be correct more than you know.
Who is this we? None of us (you, me, them, us) will be around when what you describe happens. And while it will be different when it does happen, it isn't like it will happen over night and the world will adjust to it as it is happening so it's not entirely likely to play out as you think it might.
I'm curious if the exploits can be used to correct the encryption installed by ransomware criminals.
Yes, That is unless you want an unconstitutional government who disregards the constitution whenever it feels it can or wants to.
The EPA can just as easily propose laws for congress to vote on and pass. But the EPA, just like several other agencies, is independent of the executive and the executive branch is not supposed to be dictating political goals to it.
But i guess ignoring the constitution is perfectly fine with some people. They do not care that the NSA is spying on everyone, that cops are stopping and frisking people for no more of a crime than standing on a street corner or even worse, doing so while black. They do not care that the administration is executing US citizens with drones without any judicial oversight, due process, or constitutional protections. They do not care that we torture people to validate or invalidate information.
So, are you among those people? Or are you with a different group? because if you do care about those things, you should also care about all aspects of the US constitution.
That is unless the petals failed to deploy because of a rough landing and something broke.
I'm inclined to think the parachute was more or less to orient the craft in a certain position so the other portions of the landing would work correctly. But then again, at the speeds it would have been traveling, slowing it a bit might have been a purpose too.
What if the check was in the mail and the dog did eat your homework because you got pizza grease all over it and he loves pizza too?
Or would you prefer reading about how a security patch made your think you were fixed but wasn't or even how it bricked your system because instead of a few more weeks to get it right, they have to rush it out?
Thats like saying if you drive fast your a racist. The guy never said anything about scienc. He said it is about control and mentioned another buzz word as the same
Incorect.. global warming is a generic term that encompasses the scientific phenomonom as well as the political solutions and probably a few more things.
The GP was correct and the no true scottsman arguments in order to slander his opinion just fails.
Sigh.. i read the article and understand it perfectly well. It is you who seems to be willfuly ignoring things in order to push a point of view.
All they will do is gather evidence and issue thousands of fines at once instead of as they find them. If they arent careful, they will classify Uber as a criminal organization and start siezing funds, arresting drivers for felonies, and even if uber can beat it in court, the government is above the law do lite to nothing will stol it
I do not see where he was denying anythng. Perhaps you are confused and think that anyone who does not toe a line in the most favorable way possible for the position you hold dear equates to denialism. But reality works differently. Nothing he said was untrue. Both are a lot about control.
Actually, copyright laws do say something about public performances. That is a lot different than what you are attempting to claim.
But if history has showed us anything, it is that governments and government entities are above the law. It doesn't really matter what term and conditions you set. The only people who can prosecute is the government. Thats like expecting you to citizens arrest yourself for that one time you blew through a stop sign. Aint gonna happen.
I saw this and immediately saw bull fucking shit.
Not that I necessarily disagree with you, I just immediately went there in my mind because of the wording.
Just because the EPA would be killed off does not mean that environmental protections would disappear. What is would mean is that congress would actually have to follow the constitution and vote on them, pass them into law, and either get a president to sign them or override his veto.
The problem with the EPA is that it isn't easily answerable to anyone and makes regulation with the force of law without any constitutional oversight.
Actually, congress unconstitutionally abdicated their duties to the EPA in consideration of it's mandate. We now have a generic law that says it is illegal to not obey regulations put in place by a non-constitutional and non-elected bureaucracy giving them the ability to make law on a whim without any constitutional input in most cases.
As the head of the executive, he can order them to create these regulations independent of congress. In doing so, I'm betting this will also finally trigger the court cases that make this system officially unconstitutional.
Wow.. He asked that you watch the video first because the math works out and you ignore it all and go straight for the character assassination as if it is some magic bullet that dismisses all.
I guess I'm going to have to watch the video now. Obviously there is something factual since your rebuttal to it is rooted in someone being a "denier". If I had mod point, I would mod you interesting too. But maybe not for the same reasons other did.
Dude, don't you remember the di-hydrogen monoxide debacle in the 90's by some county government in California? And yes, they have been regulating it ever since. Half the west coast is in a drought because they are reserving most of the water normally pumped there for irrigation so they have enough to cool the new NSA super computer and spy central building in Utah.
No need to look anything up. I happen to know the definition of gerrymandering. You too can if you want.
http://dictionary.reference.co...
The problem with calling the boundary disputes and prohibition on slavery for new states if that it is not an existing territory and does not favor one party over another. We do not have states that look like pentagrams with Star of David on each point in order to favor a party at one time. What we had was more of a policy push than gerrymandering.
But as I said, even if it somehow can be construed as such, the point is moot due to how the senate was selected at the time.
Ever hear of acustic cryto analizing?
Basically, with varying degress of success, a microphpne recording you typing and some software can decode your keystrokes on a wired keyboad. I'm waiting on someone to perfect the van eck effect/phreaking.. although i think that was limited to CTR monitors. Its been a while since i looked at either.
That does sort of raise the question of if you can sniff it, can you replay it?
If so, with a few keyboard shortcuts and control tans, you could have your neighbor sending penis to every email address he knows.
No it cannot. And we do not choose senators in the same way anymore do even if you manage to pinch one off, its still moot.
Obviously you have not been paying attention. I'm also not sure if you understand the constitution or the founding of the country. Here is a hint, you cannot live up to something when you ignore that something in order to have the activities in which you expect them to achive ehile they live up to. Its no wonder the government thinks it can spy on everyone, lock them up without due process, search you for nothing more than being black and in public, and just kill citizans withou due process.