It would also more or less make it impossible for individuals or small businesses to patent anything, leaving all legal protections for large corporations. This does not sound like the way to go to me.
You have bumped up against another facet of slashdot readership: the irrational anti-statist libertarian streak. Regulation is automatically bad, even when it obviously furthers otherwise desireable goals...because...ummm...yeah. Did I mention the 'irrational' part?
Your First Amendment rights do not include any guarantee that you will be heard, or that anyone will be interested in listening to you, just that you have the opportunity to speak and assemble. If drum-beating loons with giant puppets are drowning you out, maybe you should get some drums and puppets. Or maybe your ideas aren't as popular...another thing not guaranteed.
When planning to murder your husband, you should also be careful not to leave copies of '14 Exciting Ways to Shoot People' or 'Corpse Disposal for Dummies' around the house.
I'm guessing that you are trolling. Either that you you need seriously consider the amount of energy imparted to the ocean by wind, tidal forces and heating by the sun vs. the amount of energy we could possibly extract with even a huge number of these units. I guess science classes these days don't stress estimation much.
Slashdot Mirror
Might want to think that through. Her iPod can't get her pregnant.
...Uh, wait... Maybe that's the bondage slave version... Will it come pre-loaded with GIMP?Unfortunately the Airbus A380 appears to have a 2 year latency.
What's the plural of 'obnoxious pendant'?
In this case by 'states' they really mean 'state chapeters of $party'.
Well, Japan also has Compensated Dating, so I'm not sure that it is a good example.
It would also more or less make it impossible for individuals or small businesses to patent anything, leaving all legal protections for large corporations. This does not sound like the way to go to me.
So, it's not for married couples then?
As opposed to Egypt, our second-largest foriegn aid recipient?
Yeah, but you'd still have Italian conductors on British rails...
You have bumped up against another facet of slashdot readership: the irrational anti-statist libertarian streak. Regulation is automatically bad, even when it obviously furthers otherwise desireable goals...because...ummm...yeah. Did I mention the 'irrational' part?
Your First Amendment rights do not include any guarantee that you will be heard, or that anyone will be interested in listening to you, just that you have the opportunity to speak and assemble. If drum-beating loons with giant puppets are drowning you out, maybe you should get some drums and puppets. Or maybe your ideas aren't as popular...another thing not guaranteed.
Well, yes, I wasn't really saying that TOR = foolproof crime in this case, but the article emphasizes the Google aspect.
When planning to murder your husband, you should also be careful not to leave copies of '14 Exciting Ways to Shoot People' or 'Corpse Disposal for Dummies' around the house.
Potential Murderers, meet TOR. TOR, meet Potential Murderers.
I'm guessing that you are trolling. Either that you you need seriously consider the amount of energy imparted to the ocean by wind, tidal forces and heating by the sun vs. the amount of energy we could possibly extract with even a huge number of these units. I guess science classes these days don't stress estimation much.
...gayness is well established in britain since Oscar Wilde. Tell that to Turing.