All the military vehicles have this standard...reason being so that anyone can hop in the thing and drive it away in an emergency, without having to search dead bodies for keys.
The problem for civies is that any one can hop in the thing and drive it away... but I do believe the new hybirds have implemented this as a feature.
Well, I'm not (american that is) and what happens if I don't want to be king? My ego isn't that big.
Libertarians want to make such Americans kings and queens, whereas you believe that some set of authoritarians can right a broken system
First off, don't attempt to tell me what I believe, explain your own beliefs.
Second, Am I to believe that libertarians would they abolish Congress? The Presidency? The Supreme Court? By your definition, they should.
They should also have no problem with my suggestion to have all citizens start on equal footing, regardless of their current net worth... but it seems they do.
So once again, please tell me how it is libertarians can so willfully ignore the fact that the "unfairness" of the current system is being carried over into their own self styled utopia?
Libertariasm (a co-opted term in its own right) itself is pretty hypocritcal.
How do libertarians justify a reversion to "property is king" thinking, which would see those that obtained such property under a system that is (in their own mind) unjust, start with an advantage as moral?
Wouldn't a truly just libertarian system be forced to implement a "start from zero" clause, where all of a nation's property would be evenly divided among the citizens, until you say the word go? Would libertarians support this? Why not?
If you don't do that, aren't you just rewarding those that prospered under the old "broken" system? It's naive to think that Bill Gates, with his property value, and myself with mine are on even terms under a libertarian model. Aside from a few more rich folk, and a few more poor folk, what essentially would a libertarian system change?
The advocates of this system aren't concerned with making our world "better off", they're concerned with making *themselves* better off - which makes them no different than those running the show right now.
Why would I take such a risk in basically replacing the status quo led by one group with another?
I may as well support a monarchy... after all, as long as the King isn't insane we'll be ok.
Slashdot Mirror
runs our OWA just fine thanks.
Try it out, you may have some issues with your app, but whaterver owa is doing it seems to work fine without activex.
the goal is for a zero (bad) emmisions vehicle, which your solution would not be.
US politics, or maybe just USA Stuff, since that's the only thing that we've seen from it so far.
Oh yeah, and the fact that politics is somehow synonimous with the US flag.
As important as you think your business is, nobody will die if it isn't functioning.
If you can prove that (ie, hostpitals, 911, flight control) then you'd probably be able to sue as well.
this might get a whole lot more interesting....
Leave me out of it.
California will join Atlantis somewhere in the Pacific :-)
Would you perfer that nobody be able to view/print your webpage?
If you've got something you don't want to have others print, don't put it on your website.
they got half of it, they need to do it again to get the prize.
most medications are developed with government funding or in universities; even in the US.
they keep the rich rich, and the poor, poor.
im on my laptop right now which runs windows (unpatched of course) Of course? Uh, why?
You've never had to explain to a clueless user the difference between a monitor and a computer have you?
Tell you what, sit those same folk down and now re-train them on how to do mail merges. Heck, try explaining why they're being retrained even!
2 complete playstation 2's.... Do proper comparisions before you make such silly statements.
Chetien isn't PM anymore.
I know you're joking, but really, if you treated the guy right, he really wouldn't bother to take you down... it's not much of a challenge.
that's why they have these things call tape...
You actually back up your entire harddrive on 50 CDs/DVDS? Sorry, but that's just anal.
I was comparing it to other tanks, not your honda.
It's notorious for needing it's own fuel truck to follow behind it into battle....
All the military vehicles have this standard...reason being so that anyone can hop in the thing and drive it away in an emergency, without having to search dead bodies for keys.
The problem for civies is that any one can hop in the thing and drive it away... but I do believe the new hybirds have implemented this as a feature.
it works so well on the sites with moderating systems...
My 2004 madza 3 has automatic wipers... a sensor checks if it's raining and adjusts accordingly... works beautifully.
The lights operate the same way.
Doesn't the Abrams Tank have a turbine engine? Isn't it also known as a ridiculous gas guzzeller? Are you sure your numbers are correct?
You should be king if you're an American.
Well, I'm not (american that is) and what happens if I don't want to be king? My ego isn't that big.
Libertarians want to make such Americans kings and queens, whereas you believe that some set of authoritarians can right a broken system
First off, don't attempt to tell me what I believe, explain your own beliefs.
Second, Am I to believe that libertarians would they abolish Congress? The Presidency? The Supreme Court? By your definition, they should.
They should also have no problem with my suggestion to have all citizens start on equal footing, regardless of their current net worth... but it seems they do.
So once again, please tell me how it is libertarians can so willfully ignore the fact that the "unfairness" of the current system is being carried over into their own self styled utopia?
Libertariasm (a co-opted term in its own right) itself is pretty hypocritcal.
How do libertarians justify a reversion to "property is king" thinking, which would see those that obtained such property under a system that is (in their own mind) unjust, start with an advantage as moral?
Wouldn't a truly just libertarian system be forced to implement a "start from zero" clause, where all of a nation's property would be evenly divided among the citizens, until you say the word go? Would libertarians support this? Why not?
If you don't do that, aren't you just rewarding those that prospered under the old "broken" system? It's naive to think that Bill Gates, with his property value, and myself with mine are on even terms under a libertarian model. Aside from a few more rich folk, and a few more poor folk, what essentially would a libertarian system change?
The advocates of this system aren't concerned with making our world "better off", they're concerned with making *themselves* better off - which makes them no different than those running the show right now.
Why would I take such a risk in basically replacing the status quo led by one group with another?
I may as well support a monarchy... after all, as long as the King isn't insane we'll be ok.
It's called OSX.
NT being a winner had nothing to do with infighting, and everything to do with the www.