Oracle E-Business Suite has been around for years, is a very commercial product and yet STILL requires you to run "xhost +" on the application server to print PDFs from a web application.
Anyone who has had significant exposure to Oracle programing understands their pay for products are as bad if not as worse than abandoned OSS.
There is little money in fixing enterprise software but there is a ton of money getting people to pay for support.
Any company which would recommend and threaten to not support you unless you:
a) log in a admin user to a console with every server reboot b) disable all X security c) forces users to run old versions of java to access said product to print reports to an unauthenticated super user process on the application server.
Only to convert a text document to a PDF report has no room making any of the claims they are making.
I set up Xvfb in every EBS installation I have ever worked on running as nobody but it is still running with no auth and open to the world.
I also don't see any mention of an ARC, I don't know if they are even looking at porting that part. But a single disk setup is absolutly not ZFS's strong point.
With a $5000 Super Micro JBOD here are some quick number on a Solaris 11 Express system I set up this week to test the performance.
We are testing it for COMSTAR and as a fibre channel target. With a $10K head and a $5K jbod it runs rings around $100K commercial arrays.
I will have better stats on it's speed from a client perspective but I only have one 4GB HBA in the initiator system, and it fills that pipe quite well on non sync writes.
Writes
root@uszfs002:/tank/test# dd if=/dev/zero of=/tank/test/testfile bs=4k count=20000k 20480000+0 records in 20480000+0 records out 83886080000 bytes (84 GB) copied, 126.938 s, 661 MB/s
Reads.
This is using 22 1TB SATA drives in 11 striped mirrors. root@uszfs002:/tank/test# dd of=/dev/zero if=/tank/test/testfile bs=4k count=20000k 20480000+0 records in 20480000+0 records out 83886080000 bytes (84 GB) copied, 83.5461 s, 1.0 GB/s/usr/benchmarks/iozone/iozone -Rab/root/20diskraid10.wks
Re:Let me be the first to say...
on
Jaguar is Over
·
· Score: 1
Technically the 129.00 price is the upgrade. Apple is a hardware company and every machine that you purchase from them has a version of Mac OS thus when you purchace a new version it is an upgrade. This is a significant upgrade from 10.2 and the cost is justified and in line with other venders prices, they just are improving it faster.
Ok first of all there are not "VAX PDP11s" they were two different computers although the vax was the replacement for the pdp11, second they are not mainframes the are mini computers, third trek kicked ass:)
I also tried it both walking and standing still with a Garmin etrax that i purchaced this weekend. Last night it displayed 120 feet accuracy in my back yard and would say I was moving at about 1 mph. Tonight accuracy displayed is 37 feet and my back yard isn't moving:)
Slashdot Mirror
Oracle E-Business Suite has been around for years, is a very commercial product and yet STILL requires you to run "xhost +" on the application server to print PDFs from a web application.
https://forums.oracle.com/thread/2498963?start=0&tstart=0
Anyone who has had significant exposure to Oracle programing understands their pay for products are as bad if not as worse than abandoned OSS.
There is little money in fixing enterprise software but there is a ton of money getting people to pay for support.
Any company which would recommend and threaten to not support you unless you:
a) log in a admin user to a console with every server reboot
b) disable all X security
c) forces users to run old versions of java to access said product to print reports to an unauthenticated super user process on the application server.
Only to convert a text document to a PDF report has no room making any of the claims they are making.
I set up Xvfb in every EBS installation I have ever worked on running as nobody but it is still running with no auth and open to the world.
s/CORAID/corosync/
To dedicate resources to producing a good cluster LVM lock manager that does not depend on CORAID?
Something like SGI's CXVM would be great!!!
Could someone watch these for me and give me the edited highlights? I've got better things to do with 77 minutes of my life.
Obviously you never had to add a driver to a pre-module support kernel with make zImage before going to bed.
Slackware was never popular, just well known.
I would argue that in 1993 it was very popular.
Compared to SLS is it was a dream.
I did actually buy a CD-ROM drive to install RedHat's Mother's day release in late 1994.
Mostly because I got sick making floppies with dd
I also don't see any mention of an ARC, I don't know if they are even looking at porting that part. But a single disk setup is absolutly not ZFS's strong point.
With a $5000 Super Micro JBOD here are some quick number on a Solaris 11 Express system I set up this week to test the performance.
We are testing it for COMSTAR and as a fibre channel target. With a $10K head and a $5K jbod it runs rings around $100K commercial arrays.
I will have better stats on it's speed from a client perspective but I only have one 4GB HBA in the initiator system, and it fills that pipe quite well on non sync writes.
Writes
root@uszfs002:/tank/test# dd if=/dev/zero of=/tank/test/testfile bs=4k count=20000k
20480000+0 records in
20480000+0 records out
83886080000 bytes (84 GB) copied, 126.938 s, 661 MB/s
Reads.
This is using 22 1TB SATA drives in 11 striped mirrors. /usr/benchmarks/iozone/iozone -Rab /root/20diskraid10.wks
root@uszfs002:/tank/test# dd of=/dev/zero if=/tank/test/testfile bs=4k count=20000k
20480000+0 records in
20480000+0 records out
83886080000 bytes (84 GB) copied, 83.5461 s, 1.0 GB/s
The top row is records sizes, the left column is file sizes
Writer Report
4 8 16 32 64 128 256 512 1024 2048 4096 8192 16384
64 336889 610350 614542 1066042 2052169
128 240124 424133 805138 1111981 1487977 3759450
256 424604 765970 1084800 1790149 2170027 2911402 4332998
512 602243 986529 1216149 1910902 1718254 5227492 4784885 5115422
1024 632467 1132697 1762539 2353657 2547723 5950309 5169641 5120336 5630486
2048 742829 1311279 1775951 2560486 3074635 5593112 5119743 5704543 5884299 5832361
4096 784977 1364044 2008682 2592481 3105653 5587302 5603704 5713661 5447345 5996870 6005255
8192 786033 1370125 2009834 2604824 3062418 6145757 6077276 6136976 5935548 6072979 6054786 5748846
16384 799251 1392949 2034757 2540197 3108380 6243929 6030242 5966368 6127020 6030242 6136321 5853544 4599757
32768 0 0 0 0 2399347 6305173 6054631 6063446 6132982 6177918 6015674 6097339 4718317
65536 0 0 0 0 2447387 6050207 6173312 6126531 6169294 6171649 6122028 6067569 4736595
131072 0 0 0 0 2428112 6348527 6187891 6162297 5912382 6102376 6179475 6079970 4795212
262144 0 0 0 0 2421742 6297144 6170555 6108302 6157079 6174610 6182491 6154357 4832682
524288 0 0 0 0 1721533 6321524 6185705 6201142 6184905 6189866 6174416 6130026 4948176
Re-writer Report
4 8 16 32 64 128 256 512 1024 2048 4096 8192 16384
64 842003 780776 1124074 1599680 1734015
128 876086 1346196 1504659 2035099 2511022 2558895
256 861885 1437779 1907837 3705040 3879045 3285566 3823789
512 958781 1500891 2178404 2975154 3849877 4690818 4610256 4784885
1024 972414 1662264 2681328 3483896 4356809 5219904 5120336 5472650 5417427
2048 963342 1639674 2752473 3799501 4720248 4839929 5489457 5345969 5549749 5447681
4096 993181 1706585 2773270 3821310 5069594 5711761 5664678 5634950 5535098 5519094 5506711
8192 1003414 1794447 2905979 4059129 5000831 5806161 5721087 5661696 5713476 5572627 5821902 5826839
16384 1003060 1814193 2967571 4046414 5278477 6104162 5997088 6003375 5771445 5923681 5981949 6054683 4720131
32768 0
Technically the 129.00 price is the upgrade. Apple is a hardware company and every machine that you purchase from them has a version of Mac OS thus when you purchace a new version it is an upgrade. This is a significant upgrade from 10.2 and the cost is justified and in line with other venders prices, they just are improving it faster.
Wells Fargo works perfectly for me
Ok first of all there are not "VAX PDP11s" they were two different computers although the vax was the replacement for the pdp11, second they are not mainframes the are mini computers, third trek kicked ass :)
I also tried it both walking and standing still with a Garmin etrax that i purchaced this weekend. Last night it displayed 120 feet accuracy in my back yard and would say I was moving at about 1 mph. Tonight accuracy displayed is 37 feet and my back yard isn't moving :)