Slashdot Mirror


User: Taladar

Taladar's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
1,558
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 1,558

  1. Re:I love Thunderbird but it sucks. on Mozilla Lightning to Challenge Outlook · · Score: 1

    And why don't you archive all old mail after a while like anyone else?

  2. Re:It's not a worthy opponent on Mozilla Lightning to Challenge Outlook · · Score: 1

    Actually the one time I tried Evolution I immediately closed it again since it reminded me so much of Outlook.

  3. Re:It's not a worthy opponent on Mozilla Lightning to Challenge Outlook · · Score: 1

    And why exactly does a video codec have to run as anything other than a userland app in the first place? I understand why (some) drivers have to do this but pure software routines?

  4. Re:It's not a worthy opponent on Mozilla Lightning to Challenge Outlook · · Score: 1

    And why are apps able to touch hardware directly?
    And why can malicious ones crash the system?

  5. Re: I'm just waiting for someone to find a way.... on MPAA Goes After More Bittorrent Site Operators · · Score: 1

    I heard there are lots of legal uses for Google...

  6. Re:Just one slight problem with the name.... on EFF Promotes Freenet-like System Tor · · Score: 1

    [nerd] Isn't Tor a small Roswell Alien that poses as a God but really is the Supreme Commander of the Asgard Forces? [/nerd]

  7. Re:Solutions are simple. on EFF Promotes Freenet-like System Tor · · Score: 1

    So you say if I use ssh to admin my server all the text output of the programs I use and have not written myself can be decrypted by everyone without legal problems because I do not own the copyright?

  8. Re:This actually works.... on EFF Promotes Freenet-like System Tor · · Score: 1

    Or you could tunnel your traffic through ssh through tor...

  9. Re:Shouldn't that be... on EU-Funded EDOS To Simplify Open Source Development · · Score: 1

    You forgot the Gnu/ to please RMS -------- Slashdot requires you to wait 20 seconds between hitting 'reply' and submitting a comment. It's been 19 seconds since you hit 'reply'.

  10. Re:Efficiency? on EU-Funded EDOS To Simplify Open Source Development · · Score: 1

    If only one could ignore the bureaucracy in other areas as easily as the formal methods in software engineering...

  11. Re:What DRM is REALLY REALLY REALLY about on Welcome to the Future of DRM Media · · Score: 1

    I second that.

  12. Re:Serves 'em right on Microsoft EU Monopoly Appeal Thrown Out · · Score: 1
    but it's fundamentally wrong for the government to infringe on ANY company's rights to do what they feel allows them to best compete and gain market share.
    So you wouldn't mind if the Government stood and watched if MS (or anyone else for that matter) would go from house to house with machine guns and threatened people to kill them if they don't buy as many copies of Windows as they can afford?
  13. Re:Since it was useful in the last discussion... on Dead? Hope You Left Someone Your Passwords · · Score: 1

    A simple cron-job that creates a file every week and issues some action if the file is still there a week later should do the trick. A few line in the programming language of you choice or a small shell script should provide that simple logic.

  14. Re:who would think . . . on Dead? Hope You Left Someone Your Passwords · · Score: 1

    Actually this shouldn't pose a problem since mails are just text or in the worst (useful mail) case html. Of course your mail viruses would still work in Outlook 2064 since I don't think MS will fix the "stupid user - automatic script running on doubleclick" bug combination anytime soon.

  15. Re:Is this something you'd really want? on Dead? Hope You Left Someone Your Passwords · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Most relevant emails for family history should involve two people that know each other in RL. If one (sender or receiver) dies the other still can give the mails to the family if it is important.

  16. Re:FUD in it's purest form ... on Is Apache 2.0 Worth the Switch for PHP? · · Score: 1

    So, where is the problem. We simply use Apache 2 with one of the better scripting languages like perl, python or ruby that mysteriously manage to link against all the libraries you mention while at the same time they support threads.

  17. Re:PHP used to be an ASF project on Is Apache 2.0 Worth the Switch for PHP? · · Score: 2, Funny
    My personal opinion is that PHP should start again, like Microsoft often does.
    You misspelled "seldom"
  18. Re:Uhm on "Dark Alleys" on the Internet · · Score: 1

    You don't know what a MUD is, do you?

  19. Re:Note to the editors on The Media in 2014 · · Score: 1

    If you take everything posted as "news" on /. for fact you should go and visit a doctor :)

  20. Re:It wouldn't be that tough on New Calendar Proposal · · Score: 1

    It would be strange to call the new time GMT (G=Greenwich , a place in the UK) and align it to another continent.

    If we turn the time system inside out I would also strongly recommend to get rid of the hours, minutes,... and use some system that uses either binary or decimal numbers with which time-calculations are easier.

  21. Re:Sounds like a nut. on New Calendar Proposal · · Score: 1

    For (binary) simplicity we should make it 32 hours.

  22. Re:Don't hardcode paths on Building Applications with the Linux Standard Base · · Score: 1

    And what does Windows provide?

    The Registry? A bloated filesystem-like addon with lots and lots of keys of which nobody knows the purpose AND suffering from the same problems you describe (problems with two parallel versions of the same app and no clue where the config info for any given app is located if you are not the author).

    Perhaps you should propose a solution for this (without a global unique-name-giving authority)

  23. Re:Don't hardcode paths on Building Applications with the Linux Standard Base · · Score: 1

    Or you could just use the commandline options for another config file path (usually -c)

  24. Re:Standardized Standards on Building Applications with the Linux Standard Base · · Score: 1

    What you are describing are script languages. They already work today but they do not work for propietary shit because they are afraid someone would steal their source code if they gave it to the users.

  25. Re:Oh reeeally.. on Building Applications with the Linux Standard Base · · Score: 1

    If in doubt don't ever target Gnome or KDE directly. You will lose the other half. It is much better to target GTK than to target Gnome.