Wrong. Google refuses to release their own app for Windows Phone which is on par with the apps they release for iOS and Android. So it's up to Microsoft to write their own app.
WCF with a Duplex Contract comes to mind. Or just sockets (as somebody above mentioned).
Fact is: Java and.NET can do pretty much the same things and it mostly comes down to prefference. I prefer C# because I still have nightmares from Java 1.3 (not to mention making GUI's in AWT/Swing... *shudder*). Java 1.5 looked like a big improvement though with some nice stuff I felt was missing.
We will not have our legislation locked down in ways that force EU citicens to buy software from one specific vendor. FUCK YOU.
Well good thing it's at least two specific vendors then.
Apperarently our legislators are also bought off. If you as an elected politician get your salary from Microsoft Corporation or Apple Computer inc,...
I really doubt any EU politician has any say in what their IT department is doing. Did it occur to you that maybe, after evaluating all their options, the web team decided that WMV was just the best/easiest/least-sucky tech for the job all on their own?
Near the end of the shooting training in the Cooke-system when requesting docking clearance the game exits with a 'Aaaaaaaaarrrgggh! Fatal exception in "CTarget::mfCheckTarget()"!':(
Though I must say that the rest of the game is top notch.
I would think that the reason MS hasn't released a patch yet is because they have to do a lot of testing to make sure that patching this bug doesn't break something else.
At least, that's my $0.02
If you want such networks to develop, you will have to give the access for FREE (as in Beer).
Because everybody knows that developing such networks costs them nothing. Ok so $25 is a bit on the high side, but I don't see why they couldn't charge a small fee dor the service they provide.
*cough* bullshit *cough*, [citation needed], etc
Wrong. Google refuses to release their own app for Windows Phone which is on par with the apps they release for iOS and Android. So it's up to Microsoft to write their own app.
WCF with a Duplex Contract comes to mind. Or just sockets (as somebody above mentioned).
.NET can do pretty much the same things and it mostly comes down to prefference. I prefer C# because I still have nightmares from Java 1.3 (not to mention making GUI's in AWT/Swing ... *shudder*). Java 1.5 looked like a big improvement though with some nice stuff I felt was missing.
Fact is: Java and
Your statistics are almost as good as mine:
.NET more popular
Java sucks
It doesn't really look like he was too eager to sign it. Give the guy a break.
No, Nintendo has been active since 1889. There's more to gaming then computers you know. IIRC they used to make card-games.
I don't think it's really fair to compare a 7 year old product with the latest and greates OpenOffice version.
It would be cooler if it was their still-beating heart.
That would imply they have one
FYI, the Internet was created by DARPA. Really? I could have sworn that it Al Gore ...
Near the end of the shooting training in the Cooke-system when requesting docking clearance the game exits with a 'Aaaaaaaaarrrgggh! Fatal exception in "CTarget::mfCheckTarget()"!' :(
Though I must say that the rest of the game is top notch.
... how about idiot proof?
I would think that the reason MS hasn't released a patch yet is because they have to do a lot of testing to make sure that patching this bug doesn't break something else. At least, that's my $0.02
If you want such networks to develop, you will have to give the access for FREE (as in Beer).
Because everybody knows that developing such networks costs them nothing.
Ok so $25 is a bit on the high side, but I don't see why they couldn't charge a small fee dor the service they provide.