Slashdot Mirror


Company Offers Disaster-Proof Storage For Records

Makarand writes "The Atlanta Journal-Constitution is reporting that a Utah company, Perpetual Storage, is offering disaster-proof commercial storage space deep inside a granite mountain for companies looking to store their most important records. The company claims that their vaults are protected and safe from "any force known to man", including a nuclear blast. The vaults have gained popularity recently after hospitals, government agencies and universities have started using them to keep their computer records safe."

210 comments

  1. Well great! by geminidomino · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can store my MP3s and backups of Deus Ex and all of my other favorite-but-discontinued games

  2. Do we want to keep data that badly? by ObviousGuy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Perhaps a nuclear winter would be a good time to re-evaluate our social standings on something other than the size of our bank accounts.

    --
    I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
    1. Re:Do we want to keep data that badly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps a nuclear winter would be a good time to re-evaluate our social standings on something other than the size of our bank accounts.

      Maybe by the size of our brain tumors?

  3. what if? by enclaved · · Score: 4, Funny

    what if the mountain collapses?

    1. Re:what if? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am not too worried about the mountain callapsing but I am worried about the integrity of the storage medium. My records won't be any safer inside of a mountain while my CD-R's, tapes, hard drives age and become unreadable.

    2. Re:what if? by spektr · · Score: 4, Funny

      what if the mountain collapses?

      The wise man doesn't rely on a single point of failure.
      He uses a Redundant Array of Independent Mountains.

    3. Re:what if? by garglblaster · · Score: 2, Informative
      what if the mountain collapses?

      Well, not as far-fetched as you might possibly think..

      It happened before already..

      For example check out this site:

      --

      perl -e 'printf("%x!\n",49153)'

    4. Re:what if? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a Redundant Array Of Inexepensive Mountains

    5. Re:what if? by spektr · · Score: 3, Funny

      Avoid these inexpensive mountains. They often turn out to be vulcanos or have other flaws like hairline cracks or cave trolls. I tell you, I've seen big RAIMs of interconnected ebay bargains blow up all at once...

      I rely on tibetic quality work, though I heard that swiss alps aren't bad neither.

    6. Re:what if? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats why I use punch cards.

    7. Re:what if? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look into clay cuneiform tablets. 4000+ years and still readable.

    8. Re:what if? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was a remarkably poor page about what seemed to be an interesting topic. Anyone have a better page? For example, one with better pictures, or one with a description that simply states facts rather than constantly using crappy emotive devices such as "Walk further up the road. Notice anything strange? The road is not where it should be."?

    9. Re:what if? by Captain+Nitpick · · Score: 1
      Avoid these inexpensive mountains. They often turn out to be vulcanos or have other flaws like hairline cracks or cave trolls.

      Volcano-equipped mountains are not cheap. The hordes of mad scientists and villains, all wanting their own out-of-the-way place, have driven the price up.

      --
      But then again, I could be wrong.
    10. Re:what if? by paulthomas · · Score: 1

      *cough* inexpensive mountains... You and your newfangled revisionist acronyms.

      Arrrr!

    11. Re:what if? by spektr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      *cough* inexpensive mountains... You and your newfangled revisionist acronyms.

      Who's a revisionist here? When I first read about RAIDs, everybody called the disks "independent" - because that's definitely what they are. And that didn't change for many years. Then some young whippersnappers with crappy IDE disks started referring to them as "inexpensive". I can hardly imagine why someone would call a RAID of U320 or FC disks "inexpensive"...

    12. Re:what if? by nerdb0t · · Score: 1


      moron - check your facts. the original RAID paper called them inexpensive disks, not independent. get a clue.

    13. Re:what if? by AlistairGroves · · Score: 1

      This page is better, although still not brilliantly written. The Vajont Dam

    14. Re:what if? by spektr · · Score: 1

      the original RAID paper called them inexpensive disks, not independent.

      I don't appreciate your name-calling, but you're factual right about this.

      It still applies that this interpretation is no longer meaningful (and wasn't since quite a time now). Today we use expensive fast SCSI disks to build RAIDs for heavy multiuser access or we use inexpensive IDE disks to build RAIDs with high sustained transfer rates and capacities, serving few users. So the disks are not always inexpensive according to today's standards. OTOH, when the paper was written, a single big, fast, expensive disk was replaced with a RAID of comparably cheap disks. So it was a meaningful distinction back then...

  4. creators offer disaster restoration service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's in the manuals. get busy.

  5. Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    200 years later, archealogists find this huge store of data, locked safely away while we nuked each our city centres.

    1. Re:Great! by October_30th · · Score: 1
      So?

      Our demise as a race is inevitable. It will come either in the form of a suicide (nuclear war, man-made pandemic etc.), natural disaster (supervolcano, asteroid, getting hit by a deep-space gamma-ray burst) or evolution.

      What's important is that our knowledge survives.

      --
      The owls are not what they seem
    2. Re:Great! by mattjb0010 · · Score: 1

      Our demise as a race is inevitable. It will come either in the form of a suicide (nuclear war, man-made pandemic etc.), natural disaster (supervolcano, asteroid, getting hit by a deep-space gamma-ray burst) or evolution.

      Personally, I'm waiting for the heat death of the Universe, although I'd like to meet the four horsemen at some stage.

    3. Re:Great! by Deleriux · · Score: 1

      When whoever survives/evolves discovers such a vault, I am sure they will find enlightenment in Grannies colonic irrigation.

      The point is this is a profit driven idea for profit driven companies, although it would be interesting to see the colonels secret sauce recipe I am quite sure after nuclear holocaust I wouldnt be thinking about a family bucket meal.

    4. Re:Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Personally, I'm waiting for the heat death of the Universe

      Yeah, I had a coworker who did the same - all day long...

    5. Re:Great! by October_30th · · Score: 1
      When whoever survives/evolves discovers such a vault, I am sure they will find enlightenment in Grannies colonic irrigation.

      I suppose you've never seen an archeologist get excited about friggin' ancient toothpicks? I have.

      --
      The owls are not what they seem
    6. Re:Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      survives for who?

      It would be useless to a civilization more advanced then us, and anyone less advanced wouldn't be ready to handle it.

      Our knowledge needs us as much as we need it.

  6. this is not really new... by medea · · Score: 2, Informative

    take a look at mount10 (http://www.mount10.ch/index-e.html). they offer their "data fortress" for some years now here in switzerland (where every mountain has holes like swiss chees ;).

    1. Re:this is not really new... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      (where every mountain has holes like swiss chees ;)

      Wow, is your dwarf problem really that bad? Sounds like you need an elven exterminator.

  7. Kinda waiting for a fire in my house... by Soulfarmer · · Score: 1

    Every now and then, when sitting in front of my comp for hours and hours, I secretly wish my house would burn up in flames, I could get rid of this hour-eater and I would not be so concerned about upgrading every year and so on.

    For me, that kind of mountain would only guarantee I would never get "real free time" :)

    --
    -Is the meaning of life vanity, or is vanity the meaning of life?
    1. Re:Kinda waiting for a fire in my house... by avalys · · Score: 1

      Funny, I sometimes wish the same thing, except my reason is because I want to buy a faster computer without feeling guilty.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank.
    2. Re:Kinda waiting for a fire in my house... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just imagine a beowulf cluster of your old machines!

  8. Any force known to man? by kfg · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Like when the sun goes all red giant on us? How about a supernova or getting nailed by a decent sized black hole? What about gravitional collapse of the universe into a primeval atom?

    Man knows some pretty awesome and irresistable forces, chief among them, in terms of data persistence, is Rose Mary Woods.

    KFG

    1. Re:Any force known to man? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Like when the sun goes all red giant on us? How about a supernova or getting nailed by a decent sized black hole? What about gravitional collapse of the universe into a primeval atom?

      That's all covered. Sue us, if we can't deliver... *smug grin*

    2. Re:Any force known to man? by agwis · · Score: 1

      Right. I suspect that they aren't terribly worried about getting sued in any of those events :)

    3. Re:Any force known to man? by DeepDarkSky · · Score: 1

      As some have pointed out, if those things happen, your data and their guarantee are the least of your problem. However, it might be that "known to man" means "having been experienced by man", not "having knowledge of by man". So, while we have knowledge of those forces, we have not experienced them.

    4. Re:Any force known to man? by Rick.C · · Score: 1
      How about the forces of "treachery and deceit"?

      Sort of lends a more sinister meaning to "All your datas are belong to us."

      --
      You were 80% angel, 10% demon. The rest was hard to explain. - Over The Rhine
      "Math in a song is good."-Linford
    5. Re:Any force known to man? by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      I can garentee against all that, except for shit that ends the universe. For a small fee, err large fee...okay, hork'n huge fee I'll encode your data in a special encrypted codec and beam it to the universe. Your data will travel accross the universe in the form of radio waves safe from any from of disaster that can end all life on Earth.

      Note, prices does not garentee data recovery..

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    6. Re:Any force known to man? by placeclicker · · Score: 3, Funny

      If you're worrying about your personal data when the sun blows up, you've got some serious problems..

      --

      Browse at -1, because trolls are often the most creative part of /.
    7. Re:Any force known to man? by DickBreath · · Score: 1

      If we have a closed universe, what about The Big Krunch where the universe eventually collapses back to a singularity?

      Alternatively, in an open universe, what about the eventual heat death of the universe?

      I hope their contract has provisions for these events.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    8. Re:Any force known to man? by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      Like when the sun goes all red giant on us? How about a supernova or getting nailed by a decent sized black hole? What about gravitional collapse of the universe into a primeval atom?

      Nothing nearly that dramatic is required. One single sheet of paper (weighing what, 1/4 gram?) is all that is needed to access and destroy any data in that warehouse, regardless of the physical security surrounding it.

      Really!

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    9. Re:Any force known to man? by kfg · · Score: 1

      ". . . and having writ, confiscated."

      KFG

  9. Who has the keys? by mattjb0010 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The company claims that their vaults are protected and safe from "any force known to man", including a nuclear blast.

    But not including company employees.

    1. Re:Who has the keys? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But not including company employees.

      They've got a cave troll! *frikkin-big-hammer-on-storage-rack* *BOOM*

    2. Re:Who has the keys? by Florian+Weimer · · Score: 1

      But not including company employees.

      Or broken software. Quite a lot of distributed systems (including DNS servers) already failed because something or someone decided to replicate an empty database to all nodes.

      (Seriously though, I hope they offer some kind of time warp feature for their file storage, so you should be able to get a previous version of your file.)

    3. Re:Who has the keys? by ugen · · Score: 1

      That time warp feature is called "BACKUP".. Oh wait, they are doing just that.

      I would hope that people sending them data to store do not require them to throw out old data - that would definitely defeat the purpose of backups.

      On the other hand, format obsolescense is a problem. In a 100 years who would be able to read this large shiny round things? And even if they could coax a stream of bits (or bytes, if byte is still 8 bits) off it, where would be the consultant from Bangalore that knows a format of data in that stream?

      What good is a phone if you cannot speak. (wow, this finally came in handy:)

    4. Re:Who has the keys? by hikerhat · · Score: 1

      They aren't a backup service. I'm guessing the don't use much more software than what is needed to run the CCTV system.

    5. Re:Who has the keys? by hikerhat · · Score: 1

      You can certainly design your systems so no one employee can access the vault. Trying to pay off several people is much less likely to work than paying off one person. You could set it up so you need three or four, or as many as you like. Like our nuclear missile launch systems. The disgruntled employee is a big problem at places where one person (system admin for example) has access to everything. But if that's how you design your systems you get what you deserve.

  10. All it takes is one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The company claims that their vaults are protected and safe from "any force known to man", including a nuclear blast.

    How about the next Kevin Mitnick?

    Besides, if a nuclear blast takes out the humans and their, y'know, civilization...what good is the data?

    1. Re:All it takes is one... by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 1
      Besides, if a nuclear blast takes out the humans and their, y'know, civilization...what good is the data?
      EOTWAWKI is no excuse for not finishing your project. We'll provide you with an office and internet access as soon as you arrive in the afterlife.
  11. Yay by ElleyKitten · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm sure after a nuclear blast my first thoughts will go to whether or not my files are safe. Since it'll get boring down in that fallout shelter, so I should read paperwork on now-dead customers and play old video games on my computer. Well, at least until the generator dies.

    --
    "What is Internet Explorer 7? Are you saying we can't access the normal internet?" - I love tech support. Really.
    1. Re:Yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention those games on your comp may be the only copies remaining. start sharing and repopulating the earth!

    2. Re:Yay by sunwukong · · Score: 1

      You're obviously missing the point -- what use is civilization if my Galaxians high score isn't around for all to ponder?

  12. Hmm by JanneM · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Perpetual Storage -> "Long term storage"

    "Disaster-proof" -> "Disaster-resistant"

    "any force known to man" -> "most forces known to man, in reasonable amounts and not too close, and assuming no help from a disgruntled member of staff"

    Whatever happened to truth in advertising?

    --
    Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    1. Re:Hmm by bj8rn · · Score: 1
      Whatever happened to truth in advertising?

      Remember, it's not the ads that are lying but the reality.

      --
      Hell is not other people; it is yourself. - Ludwig Wittgenstein
    2. Re:Hmm by azaris · · Score: 1

      Whatever happened to truth in advertising?

      Likely the same thing that happened to "military intelligence", "living dead" and "jumbo shrimps".

    3. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Marketing is paid to do what you undid.

    4. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) store boxes claimed to be worth much
      2) Box 47a has suitcase nuke
      3) profit from lawsuit/insurance

  13. Would this block an EMP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Would an electromagnetic pulse-- the kind that nuclear explosions cause-- erase hard drives and thrash digital equipment in the vault?

    Just wondering.

    1. Re:Would this block an EMP? by Krapangor · · Score: 2, Informative

      You cannot block the EMP of a nuclear explosion.
      For blocking EMP you need a Faradays cage to trap incoming electromagnetic waves. However, the holes of the cage must be small enough to block the waves from getting in. That means that the holes can have at most one half of the wavelength in size. But the wavelength of electromagnetic waves depends on the energy. So with a nuclear (or even nuclear fission) blast you would have extremely low wavelengths in the gamma range. That means that your cage can have only very small holes. But for the gamma range this means that even the distance between atoms is too big - you can't just block them. That's why all these military stations are so deep in the earth: they don't aim to block gamma rays, they just want to get away from them to decrease the incoming energy (=less harmful). This works because you have cubic decay of the radiation intensity. Note that there is still no full protection: after WW III all these military bunkers would be full of cancer ridden mutants away.
      The only working way to protect equipment from nuclear blasts would be to increase the wavelength. This could be e.g. done by exploiting the Doppler effect. That means that you would have to accelerate your equipement away from the radiation source. While this is problematic of Earth, you could perhaps do this in space.

      --
      Owner of a Mensa membership card.
    2. Re:Would this block an EMP? by Urkki · · Score: 1

      Though if you keep accelerating in space for a while (in a context of "perpetual storage"), quite soon you should be more worried about background radiation being blue-shifted to the gamma ray frequencies... Also, in the event of disaster, some difficulties in retrieving that data might arise... ;-)

      But seriously, how much rock do you need before any radiation from a nuclear blast goes below our ability to even measure it (in any frequency)? I imagine that's not a lot, a few hundred meters perhaps, but can't be arsed to dig up the numbers and calculate...

    3. Re:Would this block an EMP? by Caeda · · Score: 0

      You cant? Hmm. that's odd, maybe you should tell that to all the military companies making emp "shielded" techonology. Its just energy, lots of energy? Yes, but energy none the less. Which means things like lead, other heavy metals, and large amounts of dirt and rock are quite effective at lowering strength and absorbing.

      --
      ~~ Please keep your arms, legs, and outright stupidity inside the ride at all times. Thank You ~~
    4. Re:Would this block an EMP? by another_henry · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Um, that's sort of true. You're confusing the gamma ray burst (prompt radiation) and EMP which are two different things. You're correct about not being able to totally gamma rays because of their incredibly low wavelength/high frequency. They can be shielded against with lots of matter in between, like lead or a whole lot of earth because the gamma rays ionize the shielding material and lose energy in doing so.

      The EMP however is completely different, almost the opposite end of the scale. It isn't a wave as much as a pulse - a very sudden, high amplitude rising and falling edge producing effects more similar to an electromagnet than radio waves. When this pulse reaches wires etc inside electronic equipment it induces a high voltage, zapping it. Faraday cages can certainly protect against them, but there are problems because to have a running computer it usually needs connecting cables for power, data etc which must go through the cage. These can conduct the pulse in unless carefully opto-isolated.

      --
      "Studies have shown that people who eat peanuts live longer than those who do not eat."
    5. Re:Would this block an EMP? by djupedal · · Score: 1

      They're storing mostly paper...

    6. Re:Would this block an EMP? by wik · · Score: 2, Funny

      Opto-isolated power? How might this work?

      Shine a bright light bulb towards a solar panel? It's probably easier to pay bubba to truck in diesel for a generator.

      --
      / \
      \ / ASCII ribbon campaign for peace
      x
      / \
    7. Re:Would this block an EMP? by another_henry · · Score: 1

      Hehe.. I guess you could pump a non-conductive fluid through pipes in the cage to drive a turbine inside. Probably just use batteries though.

      --
      "Studies have shown that people who eat peanuts live longer than those who do not eat."
    8. Re:Would this block an EMP? by adrianbaugh · · Score: 1

      If you're storing data against that kind of catastrophe it would be advisable leave them unpowered so that the Faraday cage isn't breached.

      --
      "'I pass the test,' she said. 'I will diminish, and go into the West, and remain Galadriel.'"
      - JRR Tolkien.
    9. Re:Would this block an EMP? by NewbieProgrammerMan · · Score: 2, Informative
      So with a nuclear (or even nuclear fission) blast you would have extremely low wavelengths in the gamma range. That means that your cage can have only very small holes. But for the gamma range this means that even the distance between atoms is too big - you can't just block them. That's why all these military stations are so deep in the earth: they don't aim to block gamma rays, they just want to get away from them to decrease the incoming energy (=less harmful). This works because you have cubic decay of the radiation intensity. Note that there is still no full protection: after WW III all these military bunkers would be full of cancer ridden mutants away.

      This is informative? I am not a physicist, but here are a few responses that come to mind:
      • You're trying to apply the concept of a Faraday cage to stuff on an atomic scale; that just doesn't work.
      • You can "just block" gamma radiation; even water makes a decent shield in sufficient quantities (each 24 inches of water reduces the indicent radiation by a factor of 10, IIRC). I googled for a bit but couldn't find the half or tenth-thickness for granite; even if it's 10 feet, these vaults should be very safe.
      • Gamma radiation is emitted by the fission reaction and resulting product nuclei, not by the EMP mechanism. IIRC, EMP is actually caused by asymmetric gamma flux in a nuclear device accelerating electrons in an asymmetric pattern.
      • Falloff of radiation with distance is (I believe) inverse square, not cubic.
      Even if the very low-frequency components of an EMP can get into the storage vault, keeping a magnetic tape or hard drive in a conductive magnetically shielded box would most likely be enough to keep them safe.

      So there's my 2 cents. Merry Christmas. :)
      --
      [b.belong('us') for b in bases if b.owner() == 'you']
    10. Re:Would this block an EMP? by ColaMan · · Score: 1

      Gamma radiation is emitted by the fission reaction and resulting product nuclei, not by the EMP mechanism. IIRC, EMP is actually caused by asymmetric gamma flux in a nuclear device accelerating electrons in an asymmetric pattern.


      You're right - most ground-based or low altitude nuclear explosions have a symmetrical EMP flux, causing them to effectively cancel out. (Unless you happen to be within the blast radius, then you've got bigger problems)

      A few high-altitude explosions over the pacific in the 60's caused havoc to (early) electronic stuff and power grids over a thousand miles away.

      A quick google shows a mention of this

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
  14. "Any force known to man" by Esteanil · · Score: 0

    Wow! They've made a place on earth that's safe from black holes, antimatter bombs, gamma ray bursts and meteor strikes!
    I wonder how much it'd cost to rent space enough for an apartment in there...
    And is it safe from the S2^30 bug too?

    --
    I'm a dreamer, the world is my playpen. But hey, I'm a serious person, I can't dream all the time.
  15. Finally, a solution! by Migrant+Programmer · · Score: 4, Funny

    My records are always getting melted by the sunshine.

    1. Re:Finally, a solution! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My records are always getting melted by the sunshine.

      I guess your company sucks its customers blood so badly that the SEC has to examine its records by moonlight in order to avoid the melting. But the scary truth will never see the light of day...

    2. Re:Finally, a solution! by ralphclark · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, that's chocolate hard disks for you.

    3. Re:Finally, a solution! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kids today... RECORDS? You know... Like... With music on? Vinyl?

    4. Re:Finally, a solution! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the hint - I really didn't get the joke (stupid me).
      But it's not that I'm that young that I didn't knew those vinyl discs.
      I only ignored them completely at the time and waited for sane digital technology.

      I was one of those brave souls who gave the industry an incentive to evolve!

  16. Just hope that... by gilesjuk · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's a mountain not a dormant volcano :)

  17. I'm not buying it that it's earthquake-proof by windows · · Score: 1, Insightful

    A similar project is constantly being discussed in Nevada - that is, the burying of nuclear waste in the Yucca mountains. It might be possible to build a structure to withstand earthquakes, as it's done all the time in California. But the surrounding rock really isn't protection from an earthquake. Another thing I can't help but notice is the description of the mountain. It's made of Granite, which is an igneous rock. That means at one point there was volcanic activity there to build the mountain up. It's entirely possible the potential for volcanic activity still exists. I doubt such a structure could withstand a volcano.

    1. Re:I'm not buying it that it's earthquake-proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Granite does not imply volcanic activity.

      A granite slab could have cooled and formed in the mantle and then have been pushed upwards by plate tectonics.

      There's no requirement that it be formed in a volcano.

    2. Re:I'm not buying it that it's earthquake-proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another thing I can't help but notice is the description of the mountain. It's made of Granite, which is atoms. That means at one point there was super-nova activity there to build the atoms up from hydrogen. It's entirely possible the potential for nova activity still exists. I doubt such a structure could withstand a nova.

    3. Re:I'm not buying it that it's earthquake-proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Volcanoes? You have concluded that there may be volcanoes in Salt Lake City? This in Insightful. You are an idiot.

    4. Re:I'm not buying it that it's earthquake-proof by toxic666 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Arrgh, armchair geologists getting modded Insightful.

      Granite forms at depth in the crust, not in volcanos. It is typically indicative of igneous activity a long time ago -- sometimes billions of years. Its presence is not any kind of indicator of potential for volcanic activity.

      When it is exposed at the surface, it usually indicates there has been tectonic activity that moved it upwards. Again, may have happened a long time ago.

      In the Salt Lake, there is extremely low potential for volccanic or other igneous activity. What Utah DOES have is a potential for strong seismic (earthquake) acitvity. How safe things are getting bounced around by a magnitude 7 is a matter of question. Would depend on how well engineered the structure is to isolate it from ground movement. Building structures on solid rock is more easily engineered that unconsolidated materials because there is no potential for liquifaction and the high-amplitude, low frequency surface waves (Lova, Rayleigh) are not much of a design factor.

      Building inside a granite mountain is a pretty good choice for isolating a structure from seismic waves. Just requires a good isolation system.

  18. Civilisation gone but emails are safe by mr_lithic · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Somehow I don't think the lasting impression I want to leave for future visitors to this planet is Susan from Accounts "Friday Funny".

    1. Re:Civilisation gone but emails are safe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Be honest, you're just worried about them finding the backups of all your pr0n files.

    2. Re:Civilisation gone but emails are safe by NewbieProgrammerMan · · Score: 1

      Be honest, you're just worried about them finding the backups of all your pr0n files.

      ...or finding all the backups of the 'personal photos' that Susan from Accounts and the original poster took in the storage closet....

      --
      [b.belong('us') for b in bases if b.owner() == 'you']
  19. Old news? by Niadh · · Score: 4, Funny

    Out of the area clients can use any available delivery service such as UPS, Fed Ex, or the US Mail.

    For when your uber sensitive business data must get to the super secure storage facility safely... trust USPS and remember, pack well.

    1. Re:Old news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure the safest way to send precious gems and other high-valued items is with plain old registered mail. As I recall, that's how the Hope diamond made its way to the Smithsonian. Fedex and UPS won't even let you ship those things.

      aQazaQa

  20. distribitued storage by joostje · · Score: 1

    Why don't they have a couple of moderately safe distributed around the world? Each site could be orders of magnitude cheaper, and by the time the desaster is so big all sites around the world are destroyed, no-one is interested in the data anymore anyway.

    1. Re:distribitued storage by bigman2003 · · Score: 1

      They say this is safe, and secure. The armed guards, video cameras, etc, aren't there in case of a flood, or to keep a group of feral cats from taking up residence- they are there to keep people out.

      American companies feel much safer when their data is being stored in the United States. A lot of this information is sensitive- not just the 'I want to pass it on to my children' stuff.

      These companies don't want to store it in a country where something like a coup is possible. Then the local population may go plunder the big safe that the Americans use to store their information. "They use our sacred land to store their money, which they made off the sweat from our worker's backs, and now they hire our countrymen to guard it, and they expect them to give their lives to guard their money. Let's go take it!"

      That scenario, no matter how far-fetched, would not go over well when the board is trying to figure out a place to put important stuff. They'd feel a whole lot better about putting it in Utah, next to the Mormon's records of in-breeding.

      --
      No reason to lie.
  21. Yeah, Yeah, Yeah, but.... by pjrc · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...can it survive The Most Powerful Force on Earth ??

  22. Safe from what? by phr1 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    That mountain might protect the vault from a nuclear airburst, but what about someone driving a nuke (or ordinary fertilizer truck bomb) into the vault? They could probably powder everything inside pretty good, and collapse the tunnel enough so that stuff wouldn't get dug out again for a looong time.

    Also, while the mountain may protect your stuff from any kind of physical catastrophe like meteors or mad bombers, it will do nothing to protect it from frothing lawyers and government agents (SCO, RIAA, BATF or whatever) or plain old industrial spies with briefcases full of cash, seeking access to the stuff from the people who run the facility. The perils of putting your goodies in someone else's care in a publicly known location are the same as those of storing your backups on someone else's computer over the net (and the obviousness of that peril is one reason why the net-backup business didn't do so well).

    If you want to keep something really safe, protect it well and don't tell anyone where it is. Also, if all you're trying to protect is data, rather than physical artifacts, you're better off replicating it all over the place than trying to bomb-proof it at a single site.

    1. Re:Safe from what? by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1
      If you want to keep something really safe, protect it well and don't tell anyone where it is. Also, if all you're trying to protect is data, rather than physical artifacts, you're better off replicating it all over the place than trying to bomb-proof it at a single site.

      I try to tell that to the RIAA goons, but they just don't believe me. The safest place for your data backup needs is on Kazaa or Gnutella!

    2. Re:Safe from what? by zm · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you want to keep something really safe, protect it well and don't tell anyone where it is.

      Security by obscurity ain't gonna work. What happened to some good old fashioned "encrypt the data on the tapes, and keep copies in several relatively safe locations"?

      --
      Sig ?
    3. Re:Safe from what? by adrianbaugh · · Score: 1

      Obscurity is the whole point of modern security. What do you think a passphrase is, if not controlled and assured obscurity (assured provided the algorithm is good, you don't write the passphrase down and your opponent doesn't have enough CPU time that is). While it's true that you shouldn't rely on arbitrary, non-assured, probably ill-defined obscurity I'd rather have it than not, so long as I have proper obscurity (encryption) as well. As for whether, in terms of physical location, you're better off with a well-known but relatively secure location like this vault or a hole at some quasirandom point in the desert, that probably depends on the sort of opponents you're up against, the nature of the data you're seeking to protect and the personnel you have on your side. I think either would probably suffice for your mp3 collection ;-)

      --
      "'I pass the test,' she said. 'I will diminish, and go into the West, and remain Galadriel.'"
      - JRR Tolkien.
    4. Re:Safe from what? by DickBreath · · Score: 1

      That mountain might protect the vault from a nuclear airburst, but what about someone driving a nuke (or ordinary fertilizer truck bomb) into the vault? They could probably powder everything inside pretty good, and collapse the tunnel enough so that stuff wouldn't get dug out again for a looong time.

      Not likely to happen. Disgruntled employees, postal workers, deadbeat dads, etc. probably don't have access to nukes. They might want some record about them destroyed, but are unlikely to be able to pull this off.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    5. Re:Safe from what? by hikerhat · · Score: 1

      I don't think the tunnel is big enough to drive through. You could blow up the loading dock pretty good though. If you can get the employees to open the door for you. You could pay them to yoink some records for you, but paying someone to let you detonate a bomb is a different matter.

    6. Re:Safe from what? by phr1 · · Score: 1
      What happened to some good old fashioned "encrypt the data on the tapes, and keep copies in several relatively safe locations"?

      That only works if it's just data that you're trying to protect. If it's the company's shrunken head collection, you can't manage it that way.

    7. Re:Safe from what? by dwillden · · Score: 1
      Actually the mountain,a dn the vault could survive any truck bomb that could fit on the road to the vault. The vault is carved into a huge block of solid granite. And even if the entrance were collapsed, it couldn't be collapsed very far in and could be cleared out before the staff's food and air run out. Oh and due to natural seepage, they have an unlimited supply of very pure drinking water.

      The vault was established by the LDS church for storage of microfilm decades ago. After a fire nearly wiped out the official Genealogical records of Great Britain, the Church decided to establish a safe and secure facility.

      Now evidently the church has turned operation of the vault over to an independant company who has decided to expand their services beyond Genealogical data.

      your concerns about espionage are valid but no more so than for anywhere you store any data. If it is valuable to someone, and it exists, the data is at risk due to the human element. No getting around that but this place can at least offer safety from physical harm, that no man made building can offer.

      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
  23. I dunno.... by InnovativeCX · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I dunno about this place....many qualms. I don't know how could I possibly support an organization that refuses to hang the dead, mummified remains of my Summum spiritual companions (or brothers or whatever) on the walls of a data storage center.

    In all seriousness, though they seem to have an open mind regarding material allowed to be stored, they substantially limit their potential market. For instance, "To eliminate fire risk, the company won't store paper or anything that might burn." I suppose this makes sense. But then they start turning down precious metals (and by that logic, stones such as diamonds and valuable jewelry), refusing to store cryogenically frozen human cells.

    Additionally, I have to wonder about the security of the place. It only has about ten employees, which would put suspects on a short list, but at the same time gives the mountain comparatively little protection from outside attackers. Furthermore, the excavation was done only thirty or so years ago, so it hasn't yet stood the test of time. Not long ago, they completed some more major construction adding second and third floor mezanines...I have to wonder as to whether or not any of this has affected the structural integrity and to what extent. Of course, the southwest isn't exactly the most stable region either...earthquakes are many.

    But let's put all of that aside for a moment. We have a company that has its eyes on the future!
    We figure computers are not going to go away," Nowa said.

    Merry Christmas,
    Scott
    ><>
  24. No computers at home by October_30th · · Score: 1
    I did that once.

    No, I didn't burn my house, but I sold/gave away all my four computers. I was just so damn tired of wasting time on something that would never be complete. The noise of the fans and the hopeless snake-pit of wires and dust in the corner were also contributing factors.

    My computerless life lasted for about 6 months and was, in general, a nice experience. Then I got a nice, silent computer with a flat screen.

    --
    The owls are not what they seem
    1. Re:No computers at home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      My computerless life lasted for about 6 months and was, in general, a nice experience. Then I got a nice, silent computer with a flat screen.

      Six months long you have been fallen deeper and deeper into a depression caused by computer deprivation. Vacantly staring into a real blue sky with some cumulus clowds on it, all day long... No Slashdot, no email. The isolation drove you mad and you started to fantasize about a perfect computer - silent and with a flat screen. Until you couldn't distinguish between reality and virtuality. Boy-o-boy-o-boy you really fucked up your mind. This message isn't real neither! There's nothing we can do for you anymore. Let this nut case be a warning for us all!

    2. Re:No computers at home by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 1
      This message isn't real neither! There's nothing we can do for you anymore. Let this nut case be a warning for us all!
      Oh no! Does that mean we're all just voices in his head?
  25. Talk to $cientology about vaults by AndroidCat · · Score: 3, Funny

    They have several vault sites where they keep the works of Elron Hubbard preserved. Quite elaborate and expensive. Seems redundant, you can find all the used copies of Dianetics and Battlefield Earth you could ever want at 2nd hand books stores.

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  26. Old news by afidel · · Score: 1

    Iron Mountain (who are the big boys in record management and offsite storage) has this to say in the fist paragraph of their corporate history:

    Iron Mountain has come a long way since the 50's, when a depleted iron ore mine in upstate New York was converted to the United States' first secure underground records storage center designed to protect corporate vital records in the event of a nuclear holocaust.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    1. Re:Old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hear that they also keep a backup government there too. (Although the last backup in storage is Harry S Truman, and he's getting a bit stale.)

  27. What about hackers? by ksheka · · Score: 1

    FYI, the site's running Windows XP, unpatched.

    --
    alias uptime="echo '5:33pm up 22342352324 days, 6:28, 2124315623 users, load average: 2432.40, 12312.31, 123123.19'"
    1. Re:What about hackers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. This is a job to.. James Bond!

  28. This sounds like the perfect place... by Braintrust · · Score: 1

    ... to conduct my Experiments with Evil!!

    Muhahaha... MUHahaHA... Merry Christmas Everybody!!

    --
    Years later, a doctor will tell me that I have an I.Q. of 48, and am what some people call "mentally retarded".
  29. Intergenerational by wombatmobile · · Score: 1

    It'd be a good way to get a message through to your great great great great great great great great great grandchildren. Not easy to do.

    1. Re:Intergenerational by Krapangor · · Score: 3, Funny

      You could aways encode messages in your DNA.
      Or even more sophisticated: you could encode your DNA in such a way that the message shows up as a tatoo on the buttoms of your descendants.

      --
      Owner of a Mensa membership card.
    2. Re:Intergenerational by bigman2003 · · Score: 1

      Let's say every generation had 3 children. You would have over 100,000 great^9 grandchildren, you would really have to put out a public broadcast to get your message out.

      (for those who think it is more like 20,000- please think harder)

      All my original numbers are round, except for the '1'.

      --
      No reason to lie.
  30. Granite is not the solution by ljavelin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    All organizations managing critial data has a need for a robust and reliable IT practice - nothing is more important than medical records. But storing data in granite valuts doesn't mean much if you don't know what the quality of your data, and it doesn't help you if you need to recover data in near real time.

    Many CIOs in the IT industry simply don't understand the need or purpose of IT. That's why some organizations have CIOs find it acceptable to "rarely lose records", or to have "occational network outage".

    Long term storage can't help organizations that simply don't have a good IT practice.

    I think a great example is Beth Israel Hospital in Boston. This often-told story of a four day network outage at a large hospital has been passed off as a problem caused by a lone researcher and a poorly programmed router.

    Nobody looks at the bigger picture - what are the REAL potential issues with this IT system? Was there something on the magnitude of a nuclear blast taking away the hospital's IT infrastructure? Or were there simple, systemic problems within IT that were not properly addressed by the CIO and upper management? In almost every case, it is the later.

    It all comes down to high level responsibilities. Most IT directors feel they are not responsible - they don't know how to see the issues with the "big picture". The "big picture" they can see is a nuclear blast! It's almost laughable.

    Some CIOs would rather blame a lowly worker or the vendor of a piece of equipment instead of blaming the problem on a serious-but-mundane issue within the IT organization they are responsible for.

    No wonder why IT in the USA is in such a bad state.

    1. Re:Granite is not the solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why are medical records so important? At this point not a single doctor that I visted can come up with any evidence they even saw me a decade ago and a pediatrician from 30+ years ago knows my name and history but has no records.

    2. Re:Granite is not the solution by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Why are medical records so important?

      Because only two things will survive a major nuclear war: Cockroaches and lawyers.

      If a hospital doesn't protect its medical records, they'll be sued into oblivian for malpractice by some guy with three eyes and four legs who insists that it was a surgical error rather than the 10,000 REMs he's absorbed that caused the problem.

    3. Re:Granite is not the solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If a hospital doesn't protect its medical records, they'll be sued into oblivian for malpractice

      But you just said hospitals wouldn't survive a major nuclear war (unless staffed by cockroaches and lawyers).

    4. Re:Granite is not the solution by BlacKat · · Score: 1

      "Because only two things will survive a major nuclear war: Cockroaches and lawyers."

      You said there were two things, but only listed one... ;)

  31. Right.. by rylin · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's safe from any force known to man, yet here we go, slashdotting their server, making quick on-line retrieval of even the tiniest record impossible.

    1. Re:Right.. by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      Hey -

      They said the storage space was disaster proof - that doesn't imply that you can get the stuff back out.

    2. Re:Right.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We keep all your data in one handy file called /dev/random. Retrieval can take an indefinite amount of time, and it is up to you to recognize you data once it's retrieved.

  32. Sturdy site by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Informative
    It's survived a slashdotting (so far). And they do support old things:
    Requires Microsoft Internet Explorer 3.X or later for Windows 95 or Netscape Navigator 2.X or later, Microsoft Internet Explorer 2.X or later for Macintosh.
    Checking the record:
    Perpetual Storage, Inc. (PERPETUALSTORAGE-DOM)
    6279 E. Little Cottonwood Canyon Road
    Sandy, UT 84092
    US

    Domain Name: PERPETUALSTORAGE.COM

    Record expires on 21-Jun-2006.
    Record created on 22-Jun-1997.
    Seems good for at least 2.5 years.
    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    1. Re:Sturdy site by Belzu · · Score: 1

      How far away from SANDY, UTAH is LINDON, UTAH?

    2. Re:Sturdy site by gjbivin · · Score: 1

      About 18 miles south, on the other side of a small ridge called "Point of the Mountain".

    3. Re:Sturdy site by Jesus+2.0 · · Score: 1
  33. Any force known to man? by jjgm · · Score: 4, Funny

    They need to update their physics textbook. Modern forces at work include Bureaucracy, Incompetence and Government.

    I'll bet any one of those three could breach this fortress ...

  34. Mutant 59 will do ... by foobsr · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ... mostly company business records on computer tapes and microfilm.

    See Pedler, K. & Davis, G.
    The Viking Press, New York, 1972;
    Mutant 59: The Plastic Eaters

    Or some nanobots wreaking havoc for the more hardware type of things.

    CC.

    --
    TaijiQuan (Huang, 5 loosenings)
  35. Um? by tomstdenis · · Score: 2, Funny

    Am I the only one who thinks if we fall victim to nuclear blasts are car insurance records are the least of our worries?

    Good ol' Americans. Always thinking with their greed, er lust for power, er... American dream...

    one of us. one of us. one of us.

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    1. Re:Um? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Or tax records. You could be one of the last people alive left to pay off the entire national debt!

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    2. Re:Um? by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      To who though? Recall: nuclear blast == kills off civilization. No one to pay tax to [or at least no reason to pay it since nobody is alive todo civil service]

      On a more important note where is my cookie!!?!?!?!

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    3. Re:Um? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      It's something to keep your mind off things while opening the last can of beans. "Ohmygawd, I forgot to file my taxes!" :^P

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    4. Re:Um? by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      So why not preserve comics and can opening instructions? D'uh!

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  36. Already a service in Switzerland by NoSuchGuy · · Score: 1

    A lot of european banks use this service from a swiss company. This company bought some old bunkers from the swiss gouvernment.

    Companies store tapes, harddisks, or hole computer systems there for desaster recovery.

    --
    Grundgesetz * 23. Mai 1949 - 30. November 2007 - http://www.vorratsdatenspeicherung.de/
  37. Somehow... by Kid+Brother+of+St.+A · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...I have a feeling I'll be reading about this in "The Doghouse" section of Crypto-Gram sometime soon.

    I think Schneier makes a special point in Beyond Fear that extreme terms like "absolute security" and "any force known to man" don't even make sense in a security situation. They are only used by people who don't understand security in the first place!

  38. Re:Do the Mormons knock on the Stargate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hilarious!

    you really need to provide a source (URL? newspaper?) for this!

  39. Social Engineering by pwiebe · · Score: 2

    I wonder of solid granite is strong enough to protect against social engineering...

  40. Does Simoniker have a life? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK, just digesting the excessive Christmas feast, so until I am able to move my body again I thought I would browse through /. , expecting little activity. Simoniker, get out of your bedroom and go and spend time with the family...

  41. Disaster-Proof ... by iDaZe · · Score: 1

    ... how about idiot proof?

  42. Hidden right here in Slashdot by Chatmag · · Score: 2, Funny

    I keep all my vital info woven into posts, and hidden right here, its the only place I know that won't get ./'ed.

    --
    Pete Carr Owner Chatmag.com
    1. Re:Hidden right here in Slashdot by Chatmag · · Score: 1

      It's supposed to be /.'ed. Just checking to see who's awake.

      --
      Pete Carr Owner Chatmag.com
    2. Re:Hidden right here in Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I figured the typos were part of your encoding scheme.

    3. Re:Hidden right here in Slashdot by Chatmag · · Score: 1

      You know, I take my duties as the inspiration for "The Brain" from "Pinky and The Brain" very seriously.

      --
      Pete Carr Owner Chatmag.com
  43. Impregnable, my ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "No city is impregnable into which an ass, laden with gold, can be led."

  44. Very, Very long term. by utahjazz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Most people here are missing the point. These things were orinially built to house the geneology data for the LDS church to survive serious biblical type disasters. This is for like, the end of the world comes and were diggin out, and your data is still there.

    I can't believe some of the idiots responding to this saying "this is useless because it doesn't allow restore in near-real-time".

    At the other end of the sepctrum is the idiot who is worried about volcanoes in Little Cottonwood Canyon. Please people, get a clue before posting.

    1. Re:Very, Very long term. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently you've already sent your sense of humour off for storage?

    2. Re:Very, Very long term. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      plzz!!! ne1 nows wher can I d/l "clue"!!!!1

    3. Re:Very, Very long term. by Zachary+Kessin · · Score: 1

      Do not go to slashdot for counsel, for it will say both yes and no. And be wrong on both counts

      --
      Erlang Developer and podcaster
  45. Cryptonomicon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remind anyone else of Cryptonomicon?

    1. Re:Cryptonomicon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, me too!

  46. Nuclear Winter? by Lord+Prox · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This place is using old missle silo's for data storage. I just think it was an interesting use. A swords to plowshares kinda thing.

  47. If it were that important... by thepoch · · Score: 2, Funny

    If the data was that important, I don't think I could trust anyone to hold on to it for me. For important things, I'd keep them in underwear, where no one would dare take it from. Emails, contact information, etc. No wait. The most important thing already IS in my underwear. =D

  48. But first... by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Funny

    When testing, you should always mount a scratch mountain!

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  49. storage for records by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

    When I first read that, I was thinking someone wanted to help me keep my vinyl safe. I have a 45 of Chicago's Questions 67 & 68 in mint condition that I would gladly store there...

  50. The Colonal would be proud... by fmaxwell · · Score: 1

    I feel a sense of relief knowing that, should a nuclear war take place, Kentucky Fried Chicken will have stored their secret recipe safely.

  51. Re:Boo! What a downer :-( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jeez. Talk about glass half empty. I'm hoping that it's not gonna happen for at least 90 minutes, when my Xmas roast is ready for consumption.

    Happy [xmas|holidays|blah]

  52. water chip! by gearheadsmp · · Score: 1

    What are they going to do when the Water Chip fails? Send Darl out to find one?

  53. moron "information" overload? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    mostly just fluffy greed/fear/ego based ?pr? ?firm? scriptdead last gasper corepirate nazi execrable hypenosys designed to take yOUR eye off the 'ball'/stuff that really matters?

  54. The weakest link is by segmond · · Score: 1

    man.

    --
    ------ Curiosity killed the cat. {satisfaction brought it back | it didn't die ignorant | lack of it is killing mankind
  55. I, for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...will be spending my time in the fallout shelter playing Wasteland, Fallout, Fallout 2 and nethack.

    When the world is safe to roam again, we'll see who has the experience points, stats and skills necessary to survive in the real world!

  56. Great News by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 2, Funny
    This is great news for people with my religious beliefs. We believe that in order to survive in the afterlife, our physical bodies must be carefully preserved and remain intact, and we must be buried with all of the goods and servants we will need in the next world. If any of this is ever disturbed, our time in the afterlife will come to an end. It is of the utmost importance that our tombs never be violated or destroyed.

    Naturally, this has been a great problem for my anscestors, with looters and archaeogists plundering our graves. First, we tried similar a similar long-term storage system in a huge man made stone polyhedron, but this was too conspicuous and attracted robbers. Then, we tried vaults hidden in a valley, but the robbers scoured the entire area, destroying the afterlife hopes for countless of my ancestors.

    Maybe this system, at the center of a real mountain, perpetually guarded by corporate rent-a-cops, will finally ensure the endless afterlife that we strive for. I'm going to have them send me a brochure.

  57. The LDS Church Already Does This by LouisJBouchard · · Score: 1

    The LDS Church already stores records in a mountain vault in Utah. The records are various records that the church has obtained for storage and use in their Family History Library and Centers.

    Granted, Most of the records in the vault are dated before 1930 but this idea is really old.

    1. Re:The LDS Church Already Does This by Jesus+2.0 · · Score: 1

      Really! How interesting. It sounds a little familiar, though... I'm trying to think of where I recently read that information...

      Oh yeah, the article.

  58. When I saw this... by rhetoric · · Score: 1

    I couldn't help but think of a silly movie called "Cypher"

    --

    "where words meet intent, lies rhetoric's lament"
  59. any force known to man by Skapare · · Score: 1

    I know of these:

    1. asteroid collision
    2. material degradation with age
    3. staff corruption
    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    1. Re:any force known to man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I know of these:

      1. asteroid collision
      2. material degradation with age
      3. staff corruption

      4. bankruptcy

  60. Mountain? How cute... how 70s... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Vault in a mountain? I'd feel much better with a backups distributed in ten or so places across the earth or maybe some flash memory in a geosynchronous satellite.

  61. But how do we read all this data? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funny thing is tape technology changes so rapidly that the old stuff can no longer be read as the drives break and/or they are discarded.

  62. "Decent Sized Black Hole" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, after all, those little rounds floating in the atmosphere don't do anything at all.

    Why would it need to be a decent sized black hole? The smallest black hole physically possible is enough to completely obliterate our entire solar system, and then move on to destroy some more.

    Nerd.

    1. Re:"Decent Sized Black Hole" by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Actually, the smallest black hole physically possible would almost instantly evaporate in a burst of Hawking radiation with the force of a nuclear blast - and probably then some.

      Actually - there is no lower-limit on the size of black holes. There probably is a lower-limit on the initial size of a black hole formed though ordinary means - such as stellar collapse (though I suppose if you could shoot two neutrons at each other with enough force you just might get them to form a mini-black-hole for a nanosecond). However, any black hole slowly looses mass over time until it disintegrates into nothing at all. I suppose at the lower limit it probably weighs a plank-mass or the mass of a neutrino or something like that. Of course, the rate of mass loss increases exponentially, so the decent from the mass of an asteriod to nothing at all probably goes pretty fast. I wonder how long it would take to go from the mass of the earth to nothing?

    2. Re:"Decent Sized Black Hole" by Jesus+2.0 · · Score: 1

      How does it lose mass?

    3. Re:"Decent Sized Black Hole" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you'll read your parent's post more closely, you'll notice that he wrote "looses mass" not "loses mass" -- a black hole doesn't actually lose mass. Rather, it sets mass loose upon unsuspecting towns, villages and out of the way rest stops that are frequented by big eared slashdotters such as yourself...This mass will often go on to buy a drink for people who are pleasant enough -- provided, of course, they know the difference between the words "loose" and "lose" -- unfortunately, as is too often the case on slashdot, few ever do.

    4. Re:"Decent Sized Black Hole" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You didn't even point out his ignorance and misuse of the word "decent" when he obviously meant "descent". Please, leave grammatical nitpicking up to those who actually know the language.

    5. Re:"Decent Sized Black Hole" by Radical+Rad · · Score: 1

      Through Hawking Radiation. Here is the scoop, assuming I understand it well enough to relate it to others.

      There is something called Zero Point Energy which was once considered fringe science and many of the claims regarding it still are. However, it has been verified through experiment to exist. Google for info on the Casimir Effect for more info. Basically ZPE is a steady "foam" of subatomic particles that pop into and then back out of existence. It appears in pairs of particles with corresponding anti-particles which almost immediately annihilate each other so that the net effect is zero. This is similar to a wave in a spring. There can only be a compression if there is a corresponding expansion. The length of time these "virtual particles" can exist and the separation between them is limited by the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle.

      The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle says that any particle cannot be known to exist at any certain point in space at any certain time. In other words there will always be some fuzziness in regards to its position no matter how precise of measurements you are able to take. This is why quantum mechanics must calculate all the possible paths that a particle *can* take before determining which path (or position at a specific time) is the most probable. It is not intuitive but has been proven that photons (and particles due to particle-wave duality and the DeBroglie wavelength) can teleport and the shorter the distance the more likely it is to occur. I went on about Uncertainty because I am not sure whether the Zero Point foam happens more frequently near existing particles such as a massive object like a blackhole or if the foam is uniform throughout the universe, and the time-distance relationship governed by Heisenberg's principle might be the reason.

      Regardless, what happens is: due to the distance separating the particles from the anti-particles some of the virtual particles at the event horizon escape from the gravity well while their anti-particles get sucked in. The anti-particles (with negative energy) end up annihilating some of the energy within the black hole making it slightly less massive while the escaped particles appear as radiation to the outside universe. But if the opposite occurs and the real particle is captured and the negative energy particle escapes then it would soon be annihilated so that no outflow of negative energy could be observed. Hawking didn't really explain that part very well in his book, 'The Theory of Everything'. The positive energy which gets radiated in this way just happens to match the energy that a blackbody would be expected to radiate where the virtual temperature varies with the mass of the blackhole.

    6. Re:"Decent Sized Black Hole" by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 1


      though I suppose if you could shoot two neutrons at each other with enough force you just might get them to form a mini-black-hole for a nanosecond

      I believe that they plan to do exactly that at CERN when it comes online.

      --

      --
      $tar -xvf .sig.tar
  63. DEC used to have its own by dickens · · Score: 1

    Until the early 1980s, DEC used to have its own underground facility. I think it was in Burlington, MA, if memory serves. It was then sold to Iron Mountain.

    Tough to find pictures of these things.. they don't exactly want to draw attention to themselves.

  64. fungus amongus by SuperBanana · · Score: 1

    How about biological infection?

    There's a well-known case where most of the tapes stored in one of these granite mountains were found to have been infected by a fungus that simply adored the tape medium- and rendered most of it unreadable.

    This isn't anything new. These granite mountain dealies have been around since the 60's-70's..even earlier, actually- Hitler's V2 factory was entirely inside one of these mountains.

    1. Re:fungus amongus by kfg · · Score: 1

      How about biological infection?

      I thought I covered that with Rose Mary Woods.

      KFG

  65. Why would you want to ... by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 0

    Save your data, when YOU and YOUR FAMILIY are dead?
    Human Life is more important that Fortune 1000 Company's data, we just have to make them understand we think so. And, besides this, those supposed safe places, are not safe from viruses, HD crashes, stupid clueless assholes that doesn't know how SQL, etc,etc,etc. I think tape or net Backup is still the cheaper and better way.

    --
    WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
  66. maybe the redhead knows by SuperBanana · · Score: 1
    Whatever happened to truth in advertising?

    I dunno. Maybe the redhead in those match.com ads knows.

  67. Strong currency by El+Cabri · · Score: 1

    After the dollar has lost 50% of its value over three years against the euro, it seems that fear is now the most reliable currency in the US.

  68. How to destroy it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Two Words: Asteroid Impact

  69. not anything... by chunkwhite86 · · Score: 1

    Assuming they have a fat pipe out to the internet to get all that data in there, I suppose a single un-patched windows machine in the mountain could be vulnerable to a host of malacious things.

    --
    I'd rather be a conservative nutjob than a liberal with no nuts and no job.
  70. nuclear blast by Stevyn · · Score: 1

    It can withstand a nuclear blast, but what about an MS "blast"? And what if they catch the virus before microsoft decides it's time to put out an update. I guess they should just use linux which is resistant to kryptonite

  71. Identity Theft and Total Permanent Storage by Simonetta · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Perhaps we should pause for just one second in our technological discussions of permanent storage of data and ask the more important question of WHY it is necessary to store data permanently.

    Permanent data storage means inability to correct the mistakes that are part of the storage record. With the epidemic of identity theft currently out of control, and the lack of standards concerning who collects data, what type of data, and its ultimate use, it is foolish and dangerous to permanently store what is often wrong and low quality data.

    Nor should we forget that ultimately all data is collected for political or commercial reasons, and in the West, these are often the same things. Permanent data storage is one of the foundations of permanent institutional political structures, which is just another name for fascism.

    Ever had a computer glitch destroy your credit? Are you a one of the millions of John Smith, Jin Kim, Jean Martin, Abdul Mohammad, or other people who share a common name with tens of thousands of other people? Suppose you're Juan Lopez and some twit in the Migra transposed a couple of numbers on immigration form twenty years ago and now every time you cross the US border some fuckwit demands to stick something up your ass for 'National Security'.

    And nobody or no amount of money can ever change it because the records are permanently and unalterably stored in a nuclear bomb proof mountain somewhere?

    1. Re:Identity Theft and Total Permanent Storage by shigelojoe · · Score: 1

      Permanent data storage is one of the foundations of permanent institutional political structures, which is just another name for fascism.

      So remember folks, when you use Retrospect, you're backing up Hitler. :D

    2. Re:Identity Theft and Total Permanent Storage by perfessor+multigeek · · Score: 1

      ultimately all data is collected for political or commercial reasons
      My, kneejerk much? Or perhaps just jerk.

      Well, first of all, I don't consider something being "political" as thereby self-evidently evil, and secondly, please, kiddie boy, would you say that the only reasons to want to save, say, a music collection, are "political or commercial"?
      Now, from the top, let's see you give me some examples of things that are important to you that *can't* be defined as containing an aspect that is "commercial or political".
      From there, let me give you a counterexample of benevolent data storage.

      Next week I will be helping a seventy-something woman archive the records of her swiftly dispersing family, both the already ancient and stuff like pictures of the house in which she and her husband have lived since the sixties. There they have been raising children, creating formidible art and music, and generally taking an already beautiful home (turn of the century arts and crafts) and enriching it with their lives and their work.
      I've made it a condition of my taking on the job (part of a much larger one) that they document every room of this house, video and still, and that we turn the resulting record into a stack of DVDs to be spread to everybody who wants one. After all, not only will we be emptying out the whole house, all three floors, attic, and basement, but the house will almost certainly be torn down this year to make room for a characterless highrise.
      So, is this information storage project a malevolent thing?

      But quick, before you answer, howsabout you let a bunch of us /.ers head over to your crib and burn every family photo, high school yearbook, and bit of recorded data you've got. That includes movies, music, and work records, cobber. After all, they're all a part of the big bad conspiracy.
      And be sure that you collect all of your medical records in any hands whatsoever and contribute them to the bonfire. Same goes for social security data. After all, if you're in "the system" then you're a party to "fascism".
      Then, when we're done, and everything from your phone book to your hard drive to your driver's licence have been reduced to char, you will have an ethically credible place to stand, atop your pile of smoking wreckage, to issue blanket condenmations.

      Oh, and by the way, as somebody who has actually studied fascism (trust me, reading three books on the workings of the Nazi party in two weeks was _not_ my idea of fun), you have no clue at all of what the word means. Quite contrary to your foolishness, real fascism is characterized by the replacement of rule of law (you know, transparent and documented "permanent institutional political structures") with rule by personal power and rule by localized force.

      The Hague is not fascism.
      Putting hundreds of people into custody without court hearings or filed documents is.

      Come back when you've shaved.

      Rustin

      --
      Data is the lever, rigor the fulcrum, brains the force that drives it all.
    3. Re:Identity Theft and Total Permanent Storage by lelnet · · Score: 1

      >And nobody or no amount of money can ever change it because the records are permanently and unalterably stored in a nuclear bomb proof mountain somewhere?

      "Permanently stored" != "unalterable". As long as civilization _doesn't_ collapse, the owners of those files can still update and change them whenever someone makes a decision to do so.

      More to the point, if your idea of the best way to correct errors in records is to cause a disaster that incidentally affects the existing record-storage facilities, then I wonder if you could be so kind as to stay the hell away from any place that civilized people live.

      On the actual _topic_, I'll just say that, while I can't imagine any business's records being of much consequence after a global nuclear exchange, I can certainly see why offsite backups matter to, say, the companies that had offices in the WTC.

  72. Iron Mountain by jhines · · Score: 1

    A company by that name used to do this, in a former iron ore mine.

    This would offer the benefit of some magnetic shielding, from an EMP pulse.

    For most companies, a single tape cartridge, or other removable media (cdrom, dvd-rom) will hold the most critical data, and fits just fine in a safety deposit box, at the bank. Or if your not that paranoid, in a box under the CEO's bed.

  73. Bombproof web hosting by Animats · · Score: 1

    The Bunker, in Britain, offers bombproof web hosting, in their underground data center inside an underground military base. Starting from 125 pounds per month for a dedicated 1U server. Linux hosting available.

  74. Nuclear Device Storage! by reidconti · · Score: 1

    Sweet, sounds like an awesome place to store my nuclear bombs!

    (for the humor impaired: are the assumed innocuous items in storage safe from each other?)

  75. *Bullsh!t* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The site www.perpetualstorage.com is running Roxen/3.3.63-release2 on Linux.

  76. Further explanation needed by seismic · · Score: 2, Funny

    As a system administrator I pay an arm and a leg to put my data inside a granite canyon so it can withstand any force known to man.

    Then a big disaster happens and me and everyone in my company dies.

    At that point our disaster recovery options are as follows:

    1) an alien life form to arrive on earth, rescue the data from the inside of a granite canyon, and decide to stay and run our business

    2) a primitive life form on earth that was strong enough to withstand the big natural disaster, evolves over millions of years, then rescues the data from the inside of the granite canyon and decides to run our business

    Neither scenario seems likely. But to keep the CEO happy we should probably use those good quality HP LTO tapes to make sure the data is still around in a few million years.

  77. And we care because? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If this isn't an ad, I don't know what is. There are dozens of companies that do this, or similar things. Anybody who's been working in the IT world for any length of time already knows that they can get this type of storage.

  78. Biggest Risk : Incompetence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The biggest storage risk remains: incompetent storage employees. Used to work at a company with many decades of chemical experiments, all printed out on paper by the instruments. All stored away at a company with a Mountain-like name.

    Finally decided to (a) destroy some old records, and (b) optically-scan some we didn't have in digital form. Turned out, most of the records we'd been paying to preserve, didn't exist. Their claim was we had sent them a letter, asking to destroy the records... but they couldn't produce it.

    No refund for the archival costs of the destroyed boxes, either. And I don't know why some boxes they could find were water-damaged. What the heck were we paying for?

    So, periodically check on your archival records. Mountain or not, they're not safe!

  79. ObCryptonomicon by Tal+Cohen · · Score: 1

    I am the only one who thought, reading this, "Will the construction be done by GOTO Engineering?"

    (If you haven't read Cryptonomicon: this is completely unrelated to a "GOTO statement" in programming languages.)

    - Tal

    --
    - Tal Cohen
  80. this reminds me of Vault 13 by understyled · · Score: 1
    --
    Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
  81. What I wanna know is by chadjg · · Score: 1

    where does the Swiss military store their important records?

    It couldn't cost them that much to put in some fiber and some extra racks alongside and separate from their servers, and having an army guarding your stuff has to be hell of a selling point.

    If I recall correctly, Fort Knox is right next to the main armored warfare training center for the U.S. Army. Even if you could get enough dynamite and dump trucks on site, getting away from a bunch of 20 year olds that have these nice new toys can't be that easy.

    My personal records are not that important. I don't really care that much. But, if it is really important, you need something more than what this company is offering.

    Let's face it, these guys would quit if it wasn't profitable to run their business. I want my important stuff to be guarded by an institution that will be around for it's own non-profit reasons.

    The Swiss army or a U.S. armored division will do nicely.

    --
    Why do I have this? I don't smoke.
  82. Nuclear Blast? who cares... by jrkotrla · · Score: 1

    Saddam's bunkers were nuclear blast proof. they weren't smart bomb proof. many structures that can withstand the overall pressure of a nuclear blast can't withstand the directed highly targetted force of todays conventional weapons. Besides, the real question isn't whether they can withstand a nuclear blast, but whether they can withstand a court order to be removed.

    --
    In God we trust,
    everyone else we firewall!!
  83. Yucca Mountain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm planning to store all my company's records in good old Yucca Mountain in neighboring Nevada. If it's good enough for 77,000 tons of radioactive waste, then it's surely good enough for our old personnel records, customer information, and accounting files.

  84. now they've done it ..... by Grizzlysmit · · Score: 1

    Inside the climate-controlled repository, the proprietors insist neither earthquake, fire, flood nor the most James Bond-inspired thief could penetrate its security. The vault is protected and safe from "any force known to man," they say, even a nuclear blast. Geologists are reluctant to endorse all these claims but say it's probably as safe as vaults get.

    Never make it a challenge, now all the James Bondesque thieves have taken the challenge, and even now are readying their special equipment :-D.

    Not to mention all the Earthquakes, Fires and Floods that now feel honour bound to get them :-D.

    --
    in my life God comes first.... but Linux is pretty high after that :-D
    Francis Smit
  85. Imagine ... all those badges saying "Elder" by Grizzlysmit · · Score: 1

    The idea for commercial storage came from the Mormon church, which opened its six tunnel vaults in 1964, four years earlier than Perpetual Storage. The church rarely opens its vaults to outsiders and turned down an AP request to visit.

    Come on the couldn't risk some one stealing and "Elder" badge, could they :-D?.
    --
    in my life God comes first.... but Linux is pretty high after that :-D
    Francis Smit
  86. Safe from the RIAA? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Thats a pretty powerful 'known force'...

    Perhaps i can safely store my MP3's in there...

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  87. Yes by geekoid · · Score: 1

    it will survive those phenomenom.

    Honest, if not you can get all your money back. Just give us a call.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  88. OTOH by geekoid · · Score: 1

    Volcanoes in Little Cottonwood Canyon would be a serious biblical type disaster.

    really. ;)

    Now, where do I sign up so I can have a backup of my game files?

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  89. This is a hoax, people! by Pan+T.+Hose · · Score: 1

    Perpetual storage, unlike perpetual motion, is a snake oil, which has never been patented!

    --
    Sincerely,
    Pan Tarhei Hosé, PhD.
    "Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."
  90. Ummmm by metalhed77 · · Score: 1

    yes, but then they'd also have to blow up the secondary backup facility. Any company using this ridiculous amount of storage would be sure to at the very least keep a working backup on hand.

    --
    Photos.
  91. My company uses these guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The surprising thing is how increadibly cheap they are (compared to how much you would THINK this would cost). It was actually rather refreshing to deal with them in this age of over priced under featured piece of crud business "IT" products.

    For those who are saying "can't someone just drive a car bomb down the tunnel?" What the story neglects to mention is there are two 90 degree turns inside the tunnel that should stop the shockwave of a nuclear blast, let alone some whimpy car bomb.

  92. Been around for years by belverus · · Score: 0

    Ever hear of iron Mountain (http://ironmountain.com/)? . It's called Off Site Storage and it's been around for years. Arcus, owned by Iron Mountain, had a vult underneath the WTC until the first bomb hit then they moved most of it to NJ. LOL I worked in it cranking out Foxpro code.

  93. Beer bottles, anyone? by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 1

    This would be an excellent place for me to store my bottle cap collection.

  94. Keeping *real* records protected by gringer · · Score: 1

    I wonder how they would go about protecting old records (of the tangible vinyl type). I was under the impression that those records were in danger of disintegrating over, say, a century, and the audio contained on them was being destroyed.

    --
    Ask me about repetitive DNA