You mean the picture, right? I already saw it once. That was good enough. Naw, Slashdot is all about the comments. Most of the "articles" are just ads.
"...These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations."
After re-reading it, up to that point, the hole was a bit smaller than I originally thought, but all that stuff about one's "honor and reputation" still leaves an opening if the authorities are allowed to use such things to protect their interests.
I'll check up later to see if the bill of rights has the same type of restrictions.
I afraid I would have to disagree. The UN is just made up of corrupt governments(including the US), each with their own agenda for their own benefit. It is a pirates convention in every sense of the word. Oh, wait, that's the WTO. Oh, well, same thing. Same kind of people. The only thing uniting them is their greed. For that reason, I'm grateful that they don't get along. I've read their phony-baloney "human rights" declaration. It leaves a lot of nice holes you can drive the proverbial truck through that allow the cops to knock down your door at any time. The American bill of rights is much better by a long shot. It is not to blame for its widespread misinterpretation by the courts, and most people in general, it seems. No, the only people who should "control" the internet are those who wish to set technical standards, like a weights and measures type group with no political ambitions to judge content.(Yeah, dream on, buddy) Otherwise, "out-of-control" would suit me just fine. We had beer before the internet. We'll have it long after.
Hey, if the issue of flag burning and gay bashing and other distractions can win an election, we can't blame these guys for trying to find another electoral "g" spot. They're doing their best to take our minds off the real problems so we don't get upset. And the debt...well, we all know what purpose the debt serves. Like water, money has to flow, or it gets all stinky and full of algae.
And the carriage maker just changed the shape and material to accommodate also. Blacksmiths make wrought iron patio furniture(?) I guess only the buggy whip guy was left out in the cold.
Nope. Sorry. Coolness applies equally to everybody. Taking is uncool no matter who you do it to. That's why copyright is uncool. It takes from the public and gives special privileges to the publishers. Besides, It's impossible to "rob" a government. They'll always pass it on to you-know-who.
...drive the public to fix a damaged copyright system
I'm trying, man. I'm trying. But it appears that people like "damaged". Too much fear of the unknown, I guess. My idea brings out the luddite* in everybody, even the moderators.
I was hoping we could float them out in the middle of nowhere. If these giant pools were attached to a tug boat with all the processing equipment on board, they could be kept out of the way of bad weather. A strip along prime coastline is the last thing anybody would want.
The algae grows on the surface, and the space we need is infinitesimally small. If we're going to pump it inland, then we may as well harvest the fresh rain water that constantly falls on the ocean. Big savings there.
The fuzz I see is growing around the word "unreasonable". That could be anything that 51% of the people say it is. Notice that the word is left out of the... first amendment, in its stark simplicity and exactness, and yet the debate is even more heated over it.
Nowadays they are called "glitches". Everything we do requires a few changes from the original plans as we go along. That's to be expected and hardly should be considered a show stopper.
Signed contracts are a completely different matter altogether. What the these groups are doing does not involved signed contracts. They are arbitrarily issuing statements that can result in a person, who is completely uninvolved, losing his personal property because it is a "civil" matter. And failure to comply can result in jail time. The 4th amendment has just as much place here as any. And the 5th, for what that's worth.
Slashdot Mirror
This is why we need a stronger DMCA to make illegal to "disassemble" proprietary formulas.
You mean the picture, right? I already saw it once. That was good enough. Naw, Slashdot is all about the comments. Most of the "articles" are just ads.
I prefer cylinders. If they were good enough for grandpa, they're good enough for me.
Note: With I can gather from the name of the site, it appears they might also sell hats, but I couldn't find a link.
I never read the articles on Slashdot. That's what Playboy Magazine is for.
Yeah, I like this:
"...These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations."
After re-reading it, up to that point, the hole was a bit smaller than I originally thought, but all that stuff about one's "honor and reputation" still leaves an opening if the authorities are allowed to use such things to protect their interests.
I'll check up later to see if the bill of rights has the same type of restrictions.
reject Americans
I afraid I would have to disagree. The UN is just made up of corrupt governments(including the US), each with their own agenda for their own benefit. It is a pirates convention in every sense of the word. Oh, wait, that's the WTO. Oh, well, same thing. Same kind of people. The only thing uniting them is their greed. For that reason, I'm grateful that they don't get along. I've read their phony-baloney "human rights" declaration. It leaves a lot of nice holes you can drive the proverbial truck through that allow the cops to knock down your door at any time. The American bill of rights is much better by a long shot. It is not to blame for its widespread misinterpretation by the courts, and most people in general, it seems. No, the only people who should "control" the internet are those who wish to set technical standards, like a weights and measures type group with no political ambitions to judge content.(Yeah, dream on, buddy) Otherwise, "out-of-control" would suit me just fine. We had beer before the internet. We'll have it long after.
It also explains the class of people who get elected to high office. Nothing but a bunch of snake-oil salesmen.
Well, to tell the truth, I can't even find the option to turn it off or on. Maybe they didn't install that module on my slax disk.
Hey, if the issue of flag burning and gay bashing and other distractions can win an election, we can't blame these guys for trying to find another electoral "g" spot. They're doing their best to take our minds off the real problems so we don't get upset. And the debt...well, we all know what purpose the debt serves. Like water, money has to flow, or it gets all stinky and full of algae.
Heh, Good thing I turned off Windows update
Control over the internet needs to be taken away from the Americans. We need to assure that nobody has "control" over the internet.
And the carriage maker just changed the shape and material to accommodate also. Blacksmiths make wrought iron patio furniture(?) I guess only the buggy whip guy was left out in the cold.
The infrastructure is currently geared toward producing corn.
:-) Get 'er outta granny, son, and put it into second.
Well then, it's time to change gears
Nope. Sorry. Coolness applies equally to everybody. Taking is uncool no matter who you do it to. That's why copyright is uncool. It takes from the public and gives special privileges to the publishers. Besides, It's impossible to "rob" a government. They'll always pass it on to you-know-who.
...cut the costs and pocket the difference.
So he did it to steal money? Defiance is cool. Robbery isn't.
...drive the public to fix a damaged copyright system
I'm trying, man. I'm trying. But it appears that people like "damaged". Too much fear of the unknown, I guess. My idea brings out the luddite* in everybody, even the moderators.
*merely meaning anti-progressive in this case
Those were words? I thought it was some new crypto.
I was hoping we could float them out in the middle of nowhere. If these giant pools were attached to a tug boat with all the processing equipment on board, they could be kept out of the way of bad weather. A strip along prime coastline is the last thing anybody would want.
Suck up oxygen? I thought they produced oxygen.
The algae grows on the surface, and the space we need is infinitesimally small. If we're going to pump it inland, then we may as well harvest the fresh rain water that constantly falls on the ocean. Big savings there.
As long as it wasn't the computer controlling the inanimate carbon rod, we should all be okay, right?
The fuzz I see is growing around the word "unreasonable". That could be anything that 51% of the people say it is. Notice that the word is left out of the... first amendment, in its stark simplicity and exactness, and yet the debate is even more heated over it.
Nowadays they are called "glitches". Everything we do requires a few changes from the original plans as we go along. That's to be expected and hardly should be considered a show stopper.
Signed contracts are a completely different matter altogether. What the these groups are doing does not involved signed contracts. They are arbitrarily issuing statements that can result in a person, who is completely uninvolved, losing his personal property because it is a "civil" matter. And failure to comply can result in jail time. The 4th amendment has just as much place here as any. And the 5th, for what that's worth.
I want gamma ray wireless.