Providing the connections to run the war net will cost at least
$24 billion over the next five years - more than the cost, in today's dollars, of the Manhattan Project to build the atomic bomb. Beyond that, encrypting data will be a $5 billion project.
Hundreds of thousands of new radios are likely to cost $25 billion. Satellite systems for intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance and communications will be tens of billions more. The Army's program for a war net alone has a $120 billion price tag.
Over all, Pentagon documents suggest, $200 billion or more may go for the war net's hardware and software in the next decade or so.
As long as IE was installed as well, the customers (accustomed to IE) would probably use IE again and not even notice Firefox, or try it once and then abandon it.
Would be great though, if it really worked.
Bringing together enhancements in
speed and security Trustix Secure Linux 2.2 now offers support for
Serial ATA disk drives and the leading open source AntiSpam and
AntiVirus
solutions - Spamassassin and ClamAV.
Why would we need the AntiVirus for? I've heard about *NIX servers having an antivirus app to prevent their windows clients from getting infected from programs stored in the server, but... why in a linux desktop?
Well the older logo was considered bad because it was hard to recreate. And my guess is that they just wanted a simple logo. Unless they could symbolize the "team" aspect with something simple, they wouldn't use it for the new logo.
The last one was too complex, but I don't totally like this one either. Maybe having Beastie somewhere would have been nice.
At least he's honest
on
OpenBSD 3.6 Live
·
· Score: 2, Interesting
FB: How does this compare with FreeBSD 4, FreeBSD 5, and DragonFlyBSD?
Niklas Hallqvist: Actually I don't know. I'd expect we'd do worse in anything that is interrupt-intensive. We probably do worse even for the common case where several runnable processes exist simultaneously as well. But... we do not aim to compete at the edge here. We want to make scalability happen without disrupting our security and robustness track record. We just have other priorities.
Well at least he's being honest, unlike *cough* other people/companies.
Go OpenBSD security!
We obviously have the search engine's source code. A search engine that fits in 400KB (the setup file). So Google just gave away part of their source? (The clustering part has obviously been removed)
Otherwise, google just sends index data to the google servers, and our data is searched there. Which sounds more logical.
Plus, I hope port 4664 (or w/e the port number was) is filtered, and not anyone can just access it. I hope Google didn't just rely on the possible firewalls.
but I used PHP CLI many times to solve quick problems
Yeah me too.
Can you give me an example where PHP isn't suitable for general scripting?
I didn't mean it's not suitable. I meant that I generally would use other simpler scripting tools (e.g. sh or csh scripting) more often. But yeah, some times the PHP CLI is really useful too.
Slashdot Mirror
I have done the 8 Puzzle in C++. I doubt the 15 puzzle is more difficult. Sure some things might change, but the idea should remain the same :)
Or just use gmailfs or the gmail drive shell extension (or whatever its name is).
As long as IE was installed as well, the customers (accustomed to IE) would probably use IE again and not even notice Firefox, or try it once and then abandon it. Would be great though, if it really worked.
Well with a little bit more searching, I realised I missed the part saying that this Linux was designed for the server market.. Nevermind...
Where did "doesn't" come from? :S
While the [] operator doesn't isn't boundary checked, the at() function is.
There's absolutely nothing wrong with the installer, as far as I know. Works fine for me.
Hell yeah! All I'm waiting for is Exchange support so I can persuade the netadmin to switch all Outlook clients to Thunderbird.
Once you got a FreeBSD system set up, you could/should use cvsup to update. Way faster than downloading the ISOs and burning them and reinstalling.
Well the older logo was considered bad because it was hard to recreate. And my guess is that they just wanted a simple logo. Unless they could symbolize the "team" aspect with something simple, they wouldn't use it for the new logo.
The last one was too complex, but I don't totally like this one either. Maybe having Beastie somewhere would have been nice.
Is there an advantage in booting directly from the kernel source?
We obviously have the search engine's source code. A search engine that fits in 400KB (the setup file). So Google just gave away part of their source? (The clustering part has obviously been removed) Otherwise, google just sends index data to the google servers, and our data is searched there. Which sounds more logical. Plus, I hope port 4664 (or w/e the port number was) is filtered, and not anyone can just access it. I hope Google didn't just rely on the possible firewalls.
Ugh I just noticed I got fp :)
Anyway, I wouldn't really need OOP in scripting.
PHP isn't bad, but there are better alternatives when it comes to general scripting. When it comes to scripting for websites it's a great tool :)
still better than KDE