OOoooo, stuff. I love stuff. Especially cool stuff. I can't wait to RTFA about cool stuff. Stuff they are working on. Then share it with my coworks. That will be cool.
Then flustrated must surely be in the dictionary and should've would've and could've can be replaced by the common usage of 'should of', 'could of', and 'would of' since nobody seems to be able to remember they're contractions of 'should have', 'could have' and 'would have'.
Please stop doing that!! It makes you look ignorant.
Dang. If you ask me, that's even worse. I subscribed to Discover for years. It had great science without having to slog through pages of complicated math (to defend myself, I was in high school at the time). I picked it up in an airport a couple of years ago and was so disappointed at how crappy and commercial and boring it had become. Now I know why.
Holy Crap! Disney owns Discovery? No wonder most of their "science" involves Billy-Bobs with torches and suped-up engines. Give Eisner one thing, he knows his audience.
I may be wrong, but I'm pretty sure B movies actually reuse video. I've read about it video review books, but have never actually recognized the same scene from different movies.
Glad to see I wasn't the only one. I really enjoyed the first two movies, but got soooooo sick of the cheesy fuzzy lighting on the hobbits faces and the overdone close-ups during touching or intense scenes. It was like a less-annoying Harry Potter, like at every turn PJ was saying, "Here you go, here's this big scene you were dying to see. Oh, and here's how Frodo's face looked during this touching moment. Isn't it touching? You should feel touched by now." I think he was too worried about the people who'd read it a hundred times. And as one of them, I find it rather annoying.
Slashdot Mirror
I've seen it. It was a joke. Deal with it.
What?!?!? One guy? I haven't seen "Fight Club" you insensitive clod!!!
I'd rather my daughter didn't have to hock wrapping paper and candy twice year to keep her school solvent.
OOoooo, stuff. I love stuff. Especially cool stuff. I can't wait to RTFA about cool stuff. Stuff they are working on. Then share it with my coworks. That will be cool.
Then flustrated must surely be in the dictionary and should've would've and could've can be replaced by the common usage of 'should of', 'could of', and 'would of' since nobody seems to be able to remember they're contractions of 'should have', 'could have' and 'would have'.
Please stop doing that!! It makes you look ignorant.
Dang. If you ask me, that's even worse. I subscribed to Discover for years. It had great science without having to slog through pages of complicated math (to defend myself, I was in high school at the time). I picked it up in an airport a couple of years ago and was so disappointed at how crappy and commercial and boring it had become. Now I know why.
Thanks tepples.
Holy Crap! Disney owns Discovery? No wonder most of their "science" involves Billy-Bobs with torches and suped-up engines. Give Eisner one thing, he knows his audience.
I may be wrong, but I'm pretty sure B movies actually reuse video. I've read about it video review books, but have never actually recognized the same scene from different movies.
Anyone else know anything about that?
Glad to see I wasn't the only one. I really enjoyed the first two movies, but got soooooo sick of the cheesy fuzzy lighting on the hobbits faces and the overdone close-ups during touching or intense scenes. It was like a less-annoying Harry Potter, like at every turn PJ was saying, "Here you go, here's this big scene you were dying to see. Oh, and here's how Frodo's face looked during this touching moment. Isn't it touching? You should feel touched by now." I think he was too worried about the people who'd read it a hundred times. And as one of them, I find it rather annoying.