Slashdot Mirror


Linux Desktop Summit 2004 Review

An anonymous reader writes "I had the experience this week of attending the Linux Desktop Summit hosted by Michael Robertson's Linspire, Lindows, or whatever you want to call it these days. Irregardless of what you call it, it's Linux, and the general consensus from vendors and attendees was, "We're here to stay." I have to say that this was an interesting convention. Keeping in line with the Linux community, there was more of a sense of community rather than the typical "Choose our product" ambiance, With a few exceptions of course."

190 comments

  1. All I would like to know is.... by rogabean · · Score: 4, Funny

    How many times was "Year Linux Takes The Desktop" was said at the summit? ;)~

    --
    "why don't you just slip into something more comfortable...like a coma!"
    1. Re:All I would like to know is.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know, but it's been the theme for 7 years straight!

    2. Re:All I would like to know is.... by DebianRcksLindowsLie · · Score: 0

      Well all Robertson would say is "LINDOWS takes the desktop..." No one could hear above him talking about Lindows and where the company is going. With their IPO. Just remember if you're hoping to cash in on their bubble, Lindows brought in...$63,000 dollars in sales in 2002, and spent, $6,700,000!

    3. Re:All I would like to know is.... by magarity · · Score: 1

      And all I want to know is what "Irregardless" means... Mmmmm, multiple negatives...

    4. Re:All I would like to know is.... by willabr · · Score: 0

      Pope predicts more converts to Catholicism.

    5. Re:All I would like to know is.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Looking at your post history and linked page, it really looks like you have a very unhealthy obsession with Lindows.

      Did they kill your dog or something?

    6. Re:All I would like to know is.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      heh, someone should tell that to the original poster along with the fact that irregardless isn't a word. Then again, why should facts enter in?

  2. Creative english by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 3, Funny

    Irregardless of what you call it

    So I must call it Linspire then?

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    1. Re:Creative english by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no not really. why do you ask?

    2. Re:Creative english by TedCheshireAcad · · Score: 4, Funny

      Irregardless is not a word. Where are you, spelling nazis? Troll the article!

    3. Re:Creative english by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually it IS a word.

      from m-w online:
      "Main Entry: irregardless
      Pronunciation: "ir-i-'gärd-l&s
      Function: adverb
      Etymology: probably blend of irrespective and regardless
      nonstandard : REGARDLESS
      usage Irregardless originated in dialectal American speech in the early 20th century. Its fairly widespread use in speech called it to the attention of usage commentators as early as 1927. The most frequently repeated remark about it is that "there is no such word." There is such a word, however. It is still used primarily in speech, although it can be found from time to time in edited prose. Its reputation has not risen over the years, and it is still a long way from general acceptance. Use regardless instead."

    4. Re:Creative english by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where are you, spelling nazis?
      Apparenty they are right here.

    5. Re:Creative english by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      I think you just did, but most people just modded you funny instead of noticing that irregardless is, in fact, a word. :-)

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    6. Re:Creative english by bakes · · Score: 1

      Although it is a real word, its meaning is unclear, so we should all strive to stop using it.

      We should be irregardless-less.
      We must not exhibit irregardless-ness.

      We must be irregardless-less-ness-less.

      (Kudos to Rowan Atkinson for this one).

      --
      Ho! Haha! Guard! Turn! Parry! Dodge! Spin! Ha! Thrust!
    7. Re:Creative english by BigDumbSpaceApe · · Score: 1
      This is hardly convincing. There is some debate about what should be included in a dictionary, but there is no doubt what someone means when they say "That is not a word." They mean that it is not a word in Standard Written English.

      As the entry notes, 'irregardless' is non-standard. Nifty article about disagreements about words here.

      If we use m-w's definition of what is a word, 'fizzle my shizzle fo nizzle' is a phrase made up of words. This is pure glafinacation (which is a word, cuz i just used :P).

      --
      WWJD? JWRTFM.
    8. Re:Creative english by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      then mama must've dropped you on a concrete floor or something

    9. Re:Creative english by cozziewozzie · · Score: 2

      It's just a matter of time before all wrong words spoken by uneducated people get added to different dictionaries. Sooner or later, we will find "diffnatley" and "defiantly" as synonyms for 'definitely' (nevermind that 'defiantly' is an actual word with very different meaning), along with 200 other misspellings, and "I of saw" as a modern version of present perfect phrase "I have seen".

      Put it in as many dictionaries as you will, but "irregardless" is wrong. It is a word, but it's a word used by illiterate people.

    10. Re:Creative english by Rhonwyyn · · Score: 1

      Don't forget words like "prolly"!

    11. Re:Creative english by house15 · · Score: 1

      Then flustrated must surely be in the dictionary and should've would've and could've can be replaced by the common usage of 'should of', 'could of', and 'would of' since nobody seems to be able to remember they're contractions of 'should have', 'could have' and 'would have'.

      Please stop doing that!! It makes you look ignorant.

  3. Ir by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Irregardless of what you call it

    Irredudant

  4. Re:Linux: My Observations(Certified MS Professiona by LouSir · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Don't want to be an asshat but I think it should be "regardless" not "Irregardless of what you call it" . Proper grammar and spelling leads to something positive, though I'm not sure what. Lou Sir

  5. it IS here to stay by Chuck+Bucket · · Score: 4, Informative

    every year is called 'the year of th elinux desktop', but every year little progress SEEMS to be made. the fact is, Linux IS still around, and will be for a long time. it's acceptance on the desktop will rise as younger folks come into the workplace. think about it, more college students use/understand linux and open source, so yeah, I'm bullish on the future of Linux on the Desktop.

    Plus, with WMs like XFCE4 and desktops like Gnome2.6 and KDE 3.2, you can tell that the technology is already there for 90% of what you need on the desktop.

    VDS

    1. Re:it IS here to stay by name773 · · Score: 3, Informative
      WMs like XFCE4 and desktops like Gnome2.6 and KDE 3.2
      and ratpoison is pretty good for a lightweight wm. seing a highres terminal at full screen... drool. oh and konqueror on full screen... that's amazing.

      p.s. i found out about ratpoison via a /. post

    2. Re:it IS here to stay by peeping_Thomist · · Score: 1

      Ratpoison rocks. I used ion for a couple of years, thinking it was great, but last year I switched to ratpoison, and I'll never go back. I *like* having a window manager I can only interact with via keystrokes.

      Of course, it helps to have dual monitors...

      --
      Anything worth doing is worth doing badly -- G.K. Chesterton
  6. Swag has returned? by ObviousGuy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've been to several conferences in the past few years and have noticed a huge reduction in the amount and quality of conference swag. In the heydays of 1998 and 1999, you could come away with enough clothes to last you all year without washing (about 5 or 6 t-shirts), but nowadays you'd practically have to kill some booth babe to score a pen or mousepad.

    This guy says Novell is giving away t-shirts again? Does this foreshadow a return to the heady days of the dotcom boom? Buy tech stocks, folks, it looks like we've got ourselves an upswing in the making!

    --
    I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
    1. Re:Swag has returned? by antic · · Score: 1

      I'd be surprised if this was happening with Linux OS companies though. If you catch something like Oprah's Christmas show where she gives out cell phones, gourmet food, homewares and the like, all for free, you'll realise that it's because she's marketing it to affluent women with not only money to burn, but an interest in burning it.

      Why would a company give away t-shirts and gadgets to a crowd of guys (income judgements aside) who are interested in a product that is essentially free?

      For the most part, the return just isn't there.

      That said, this is a lot of generalising. Fact is that the typical geek has money, but they're often smart enough to spend it carefully.

      Free gear is great, but I think that expecting to receive it in this situation is a bit hopeful! :(

      --
      'Thats they exact same thing a banana wrench monkey.'
    2. Re:Swag has returned? by njdj · · Score: 4, Funny
      you could come away with enough clothes to last you all year without washing (about 5 or 6 t-shirts)

      6 t-shirts last a year without washing ...? I think you've just done more to turn people away from Linux than SCO, Rob Enderle and Laura DiDio combined.

  7. Re:Linux: My Observations(Certified MS Professiona by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

    they're issued by the biggest software company in existence.

    IBM?

    --
    Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
  8. I can make up facts too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Linux:

    * has 73.2% better interoperopenfunkability;
    * is 21.1% more likely to smell like fresh pine;
    * and is 25.7% faster via bogolumped figinert bus operability within the plantifold interface than any version of Windows.

    1. Re:I can make up facts too! by FrYGuY101 · · Score: 1

      That's the problem. He hates the fresh pine smell.

      --
      "If we let things terrify us, life will not be worth living."

      - Seneca
    2. Re:I can make up facts too! by LordK3nn3th · · Score: 1

      I thought it smelled like penguin.

      --

      ---
      Never criticize religion on Slashdot. You will be modded down for "Troll" no matter how factual it is.
    3. Re:I can make up facts too! by 0racle · · Score: 1

      has 73.2% better interoperopenfunkability
      I don't know about that. I'm having problems getting my Slack to do anything funky, yet Windows seems to be full of funk. Just run it for a while and it seems to get funky every day.

      As for pine, I prefer X based mail readers.

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    4. Re:I can make up facts too! by Espectr0 · · Score: 1

      * is 21.1% more likely to smell like fresh pine;

      Really? Remember what the linux mascot smells like?

    5. Re:I can make up facts too! by leomekenkamp · · Score: 1

      Rick? Rick Berman? It's you right? Did not no you frequented /.

      The plantifold interface clearly gave you away...

      --
      Wenn ist das Nunstueck git und Slotermeyer? Ja! Beiherhund das Oder die Flipperwaldt gersput.
  9. Somehow I'm pretty sure Mandrake was missing .... by phoxix · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Slightly OT, but I can't resist ...

    There is no denying it. Mandrake is a lovely 100% GPL user-friendly distro, that seems to be rather popular ... (they have a GUI front-end for everything, CUPS, Samba, even VPN!!) It probably beats the crap ot Linspire anyday of the week.

    But even without knowing much about this meeting, I'm pretty sure that Mandrakesoft wasn't there. Why? because Mandrakesoft does a crappy job of MARKETING. And its getting really annoying too watching crap distros like Linspire get so much spot-light.

    Like I said ... this rant was OT and morely for my fellow Mandrake users ...

    Sunny Dubey

  10. Lexmark printers by xmorg · · Score: 1, Interesting

    the article was kinda lacking in the way of telling us if the particular printer being raffled could print on a *nix! I would be downright hilarius/evil if it was XP only.

    1. Re:Lexmark printers by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      Lexmark has been historically very good about providing Linux drivers for their printers. Visit their site and you'll see that they proudly announce it.
      If you take their proprietary driver and foomatic it, you can even use the stuff under Cups!

    2. Re:Lexmark printers by IANAAC · · Score: 1
      I wish they'd throw in support more that just a few of their "Z" printers, though. I can't really understand why they don't at least put out some drivers for their Optra series.

      The "X" all-in-one series I can understand why there's no driver, but the Optras?

  11. clarifications on the games by SilentWatcher · · Score: 5, Informative
    Further on down my wanderings, I bumped into GarageGames.com. They have a kick-ass commercial game which looks a lot like Mech Warrior, and it runs nicely and natively under Linux. They also demo'd the classic Doom game which runs under Linspire's Click-And-Run installation.

    I was working for Garage Games at this conference.

    The large robot game is Dark Horizon's: Lore and it will be released for linux in a few weeks. It is already available for windows and osx.

    We also showed Think Tanks, Orbz, and Marble Blast. All of these are available for windows, mac and linux, from the Garage Games site.

    We did NOT demo Doom. People were playing that because some of the machines didn't have good enough 3D acceleration (i.e. no nvidia cards) to run the other games.

    1. Re:clarifications on the games by PurifyTheMind · · Score: 1

      We did NOT demo Doom. People were playing that because some of the machines didn't have good enough 3D acceleration (i.e. no nvidia cards) to run the other games.

      Are NVIDIA cards favored (over ATI) by Linux gamers because of better driver support? I have to admit that I am out of late on the latest on this front. Thanks.

    2. Re:clarifications on the games by SilentWatcher · · Score: 1

      Most Torque engine games will run on ATI cards using their proprietary drivers. Its the DRI drivers that cause problems (at least for Torque). We haven't had the time/resources to make the DRI drivers work with the engine.

    3. Re:clarifications on the games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you sure it isn't a random colon?

    4. Re:clarifications on the games by Deraj+DeZine · · Score: 1

      I am a Linux user and I favor nVidia cards for their better (as I perceive it) driver support. I can't speak for everyone, but I'll do it anyway: the answer to your query is "yes".

      --
      True story.
    5. Re:clarifications on the games by arendjr · · Score: 1

      Why are you denying you demo'd Doom? It's one thing you should never deny. You should be proud you know your classics ;)

  12. slashdot effect blues by big+daddy+kane · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    huh this is amazing, the slashdot effect roars in like a lion and takes down any server in its path, has anyone thought of using to to bring down severs intentioanlly? why not give the ip's of some people you dont like,everyone try to connect to them and theyll be slashdotted to oblivian before you know it! mods: this is not a flame! its called satire, you dont have to like it but you dont have to mod it donw either.

  13. You've got to keep in mind... by 222 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    that profitable companies using / pushing linux are essential for it to gather mainstream acceptance.
    I know it may leave a nasty taste in your mouth to witness the commercialization of linux, but really, its something we should not only get used to, but push.
    Im sorry, but the trailing sentance in the article posting made my inner penguin frown...

    1. Re:You've got to keep in mind... by peeping_Thomist · · Score: 1

      I know it may leave a nasty taste in your mouth to witness the commercialization of linux, but really, its something we should not only get used to, but push.

      Why?

      You say this as though it is self-evident. It isn't.

      --
      Anything worth doing is worth doing badly -- G.K. Chesterton
    2. Re:You've got to keep in mind... by 222 · · Score: 1

      Well, i suppose that depends on what you feel GNU/Linux should do in this world. In my opinion, i see it as a robust, elegant and rapidly evolving OS that has such a seemingly unlimited potential usage that it eclipses the scope of not only my own knowlege, but the purpose of this comment.
      I know homogenous computing enviornments are "bad", but if it were up to me, everything would run linux.
      I'm not trying to sound like a zealot (apologies if i do) but as far as operating systems go, i find it absurd that we havent been able to stand on the shoulders of our former software engineers more than we have. We can thank our ridiculous means of handling intellectual property for that...*cough SCO cough*.
      Ranting aside, I dont feel linux could ever achieve this sort of acceptance if there isnt money to be made from it. IBM, Sun, HP, SGI... none of these companies would contribute if there wasnt something in it for them. Companies cannot afford to be altruistic most of the time, and it is beyond reason to ask them to. If Linspire can make a buck selling something, i dont care. If Turbolinux can make a buck selling propritary codecs, i dont care. It amazes me how much it fails to reach people that ISV's arent going desire developing their products for a platform where core users flame about including proprietary video codecs. If non-free software and free software cant get along, (given the current desktop market) free software will suffer.

  14. Sorry to be a grammar nazi, but this must end. by Lord+Kano · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Irregardless of what you call it, it's Linux, and the general consensus from vendors and attendees was, "We're here to stay."

    Let's look at the word here.

    regardless adj. In spite of everything; anyway: continues to work regardless.

    ir pref. variant of in-.

    in pref. Not: inarticulate. Before l, in- is usually assimilated to il-; before r to ir-; and before b, m, and p to im-.


    Regardless is the correct word in this situation. "Irregardless" is the equivalent of saying "Not regardless".

    Obviously not the usage that the submitter had in mind.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    1. Re:Sorry to be a grammar nazi, but this must end. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously not the usage that the submitter had in mind.

      Yes, it's obvious, and you're only the fifth person to point it out, so why did you feel the need to post this drivel? Have you never made mistakes when writing something? I bet you double-checked your pointless grammar explanation really carefully too, so you don't end up looking like an idiot...

    2. Re:Sorry to be a grammar nazi, but this must end. by PurifyTheMind · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I apologize for the off topic comment, but this is something that I think gets censored or at least ignored too often on this site.

      Correct grammar and competent editing by Slashdot editors in general is important for at least two reasons I can think of off the top of my head:

      1. Slashdot is seen as a representative of the open source movement, and Linux in particular. Whether this is fair or not is beside the point. Professional writing would go a long way toward open source being taken more seriously.
      2. Do Slashdot editors want my money for a subscription, or at the very least want me to stop blocking their ads? Well, let's see something approaching journalistic standards then.
    3. Re:Sorry to be a grammar nazi, but this must end. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2. Do Slashdot editors want my money for a subscription, or at the very least want me to stop blocking their ads? Well, let's see something approaching journalistic standards then.


      I really doubt the /. editors care if you block the ads or not. They might appreciate a subscription, but they probably don't care too much about that either. OSDN on the other hand probably does.

    4. Re:Sorry to be a grammar nazi, but this must end. by ginwizard · · Score: 0

      I couldn't agree more. Judging by the content, which so often devolves into incoherence, I don't think slashdot users really need any help finding points on which to debate with any given issue. If someone wants to find fault with Slashdot, let them find it in the commenting. Given the audience of literally thousands, the slightest bit of editing prior to an editor posting doesn't seem like much of a leap. Slashdot is indeed a representative (as you said, fair or not) of open source, and more generally, of geeks in general. This responsibility should not be taken lightly.

      --
      You can't spell LOLCATZPURR without TROLL.
    5. Re:Sorry to be a grammar nazi, but this must end. by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Whether this is fair or not is beside the point.

      I think that it is fair, after all Rob appears in Revolution OS, the movie about GNU/Linux.

      SCO's most viscious detractors are here. Remember the Iopener Linux hack? It got more popularity here than anywhere else. Being that this is a thread about Linux, at the very least, the submitter should make a nominal effort to prevent making the whole community look bad.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    6. Re:Sorry to be a grammar nazi, but this must end. by PurifyTheMind · · Score: 1

      I really doubt the /. editors care if you block the ads or not. They might appreciate a subscription, but they probably don't care too much about that either.

      Perhaps, but this is exactly the problem in the first place. Apathy is not a favorable quality in writers, editors, businesspeople, or web developers.

    7. Re:Sorry to be a grammar nazi, but this must end. by KFW · · Score: 1

      If you'd spent some of the time you spent looking up the components and looked up "irregardless" directly, you see that it means the same thing as "regardless". Just like "inflammable" means the same thing as "flammable."

      English--tricky language that.

      >K

    8. Re:Sorry to be a grammar nazi, but this must end. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "in" in "inflammable" means "into". The "ir" in "irregardless" does not mean "into".

    9. Re:Sorry to be a grammar nazi, but this must end. by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Irregardless is nonstandard English, but it is built using a standard English root and prefix.

      I just had a flashback to high school. During the 1991-1992 school year, Ice Cube released an album by the name of "Death Certificate" in that album he refers to female genitals as "The cock", overnight people started referring to female genitals as "The cock". During all of my previous english speaking experience "cock" was a term for male genitals.

      Overnight the definition of a word, nonstandard or not, is supposed to change because one illiterate and a bunch of wannabes decide so? I rejected that notion then, I reject it now.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    10. Re:Sorry to be a grammar nazi, but this must end. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      inflammable means flammable? what a country!

  15. Converting Users by cloudless.net · · Score: 3, Informative
    "Their plan is simple. Give your Windows users applications which run on both Linux and Windows, teach them how to use them and when they are comfortable, replace the Operating System with Linux."

    In my experience it is not as simple as that. Most people have resistance for change. When they have got used to one operating system it is not easy to teach them to do things in a different way. And Linux is still behind Windows in terms of usability, which I think should be the first priority for future Linux development.

    1. Re:Converting Users by tjwhaynes · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In my experience it is not as simple as that. Most people have resistance for change. When they have got used to one operating system it is not easy to teach them to do things in a different way. And Linux is still behind Windows in terms of usability, which I think should be the first priority for future Linux development.

      Actually, I'd disagree on both points. Most people wouldn't notice if you swapped Windows XP and XPde on their machines until they realized that their desktop had been running for a couple of months without a virus attack bringing their system to its knees. A developer would notice almost immediately but I suspect that if you kept the menus similar enough, most people would just pick up and go.

      On useability, I'd say that GNOME was streets ahead of Windows for simplicity and usability (I don't use KDE so I can't compare there). Consistent look and feel across all HIGified GNOME apps, intelligent prompt buttons in prompt windows (and some serious gdesklet eyecandy :-) ) make it an easy system for a user to grasp. I find Windows XP to be a mess of animated icons and swooping flashing windows ruining my concentration in its default form, and I feel palpable relief when I get back to a Linux box with its calmer, faster and more comfortable setup.

      Usability is partly a function of what you are used to. But switching isn't nearly as tough as a lot of people seem to think (or fear).

      Cheers,

      Toby Haynes

      --
      Anything I post is strictly my own thoughts and doesn't necessarily have anything to do with the opinions of IBM.
    2. Re:Converting Users by westlake · · Score: 1, Informative
      Most people wouldn't notice if you swapped Windows XP and XPde on their machines until they realized that their desktop had been running for a couple of months without a virus attack bringing their system to its knees.

      How strange. I have been using Windows at home since '95 and have yet to log a virus. The systems at work seem to keep ticking along as well.

    3. Re:Converting Users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Most people wouldn't notice if you swapped Windows XP and XPde on their machines until they realized that their desktop had been running for a couple of months without a virus attack bringing their system to its knees.

      A lot of people just use Windows for email, web browsing, and word processing. I think they'd notice if AOL didn't run, IE was nowhere to be found, and Word was replaced with OpenOffice.

    4. Re:Converting Users by TheRealSlimShady · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Most people wouldn't notice if you swapped Windows XP and XPde on their machines until they realized that their desktop had been running for a couple of months without a virus attack bringing their system to its knees.

      You know, this sort of rhetoric isn't really helpful to any debate about the merits of different operating systems. In a professionally managed environment, it's relatively simple to prevent viruses. This sort of statement is about the same as "GPL is a cancer"

    5. Re:Converting Users by advocate_one · · Score: 1
      "In a professionally managed environment, it's relatively simple to prevent viruses."

      The key words there in your statement are "professionally managed"... and judging by the evidence of my own spam/virus filtering and the hits on my firewall... the vast majority of home users and businesses out there using ms-windows are not professionally managed... and the default security settings of XP HE do not encourage it and there is very little mention in the little pamphlet that comes with a box these days of the requirements for setting a good password for the hidden administrator account or for not running with admin privileges either... or for turning on the pathetic firewall that comes with it either...

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
  16. Re:Linux: My Observations(Certified MS Professiona by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    9 out of 10 users agree that downloading 4 CDs of mostly worthless extras that will be outdated in a month to install Fedora blows.

  17. Re:Irregardless? by xmorg · · Score: 0

    "Irregardless" may not be a word, but its used so much it now is a word. What happended to the nazi's? They had so many nations attacking them that they evenually lost. You cant stop us all, irregarless of how hard you try :P

  18. Re:Linux: My Observations(Certified MS Professiona by NEOtaku17 · · Score: 1

    9 out of 10 people agree that downloading 4 cds for free is better then paying $150.

  19. I left with 4 shirts and 6 bottles of maple syrup by amorphosamon · · Score: 3, Interesting


    YES, Novell gave out a SuSE/Novell/Ximian shirt.

    I also left with a Real Helix shirt
    A PC Club shirt
    And the Desktop Linux Conference shirt

    If you were lucky, you got one of the shirts the mozilla guy raffled out. (I saw him just *give* one to Nat Friedman, but thats ok) I was lucky to grab a nice CD 'n' sleeve of mozilla goodness.

    Seagate gave out the trippiest pen I've ever seen.

    DeviantArt gave out nice stickers.

    Sun gave out CDs of StarOffice and the Java Desktop

    Some random mousepads.

    PC Club gave out a coupon for a free case/powersupply with a purchase of $200 or more

    The prize goes to sub300.com. They gave out little bottles of maple syrup. there were so many after the conference they were handing out extra ones whether you wanted them or not.

    I'm yet to have pancakes or french toast, so i can't comment on them. They say 100% pure, so it should be pretty good.

    --
    religion != morality
  20. Re:Linux: My Observations(Certified MS Professiona by LordK3nn3th · · Score: 1

    4 CDs with high-quality, FREE software that let you choose among competing softwares which to install!

    --

    ---
    Never criticize religion on Slashdot. You will be modded down for "Troll" no matter how factual it is.
  21. Re:Linux: My Observations(Certified MS Professiona by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The other 1 out of 9 people have a slow dialup connection. :-(

  22. "Irregardless" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I shudder involuntarily every time I come across that "word." Do us a favor and buy yourself a dictionary, preferably an old-school OED or something, and hit yourself over the head with it. Repeatedly.

    Mike

    1. Re:"Irregardless" by hedgeman · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Irregardless of your critisim, the OED lists irregardless as the humorous form of regardless.

    2. Re:"Irregardless" by 10Ghz · · Score: 2, Funny

      That word always reminds me of a dialogue in The Parlor, one of my favourite short-movies:

      Guy A: Irregardless, she's a twat!
      Buy B: "Irregardless" isn't even a word
      Guy A: Yes it is! It means "Without lack of regard"
      Guy B: I pity you
      Guy A: You do huh?
      Guy B: Yeah
      Guy A: Ooh, you're getting me all weepy!
      Woman: Don't cry Joe! Wanna hug?

      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
  23. Re:Linux: My Observations(Certified MS Professiona by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, I sure am glad they've included Korean language fonts and documentation for KDE and other completely worthless junk.

    9 out of 10 users agree that netinst + apt-get beats the shit out of downloading 4 CDs.

  24. Re:Linux: My Observations(Certified MS Professiona by alephdelta · · Score: 0, Troll

    That's why Slashdot's servers run on Windows right guys?

  25. desktop disparity by damonxyz · · Score: 1

    For all the talk of new technology and pace of change, the real pace of change is incredibly bad. Conventional wisdom equates change with the constant appearance of new technologies. Real change is seen in technology that increase productivity at the commodity level. The desktop is the commodity and applications are a response to peoples need to process information. The integration between the two is pathetic Other than at a superficial level - quote whatever new schemes you like - there is no linking between how the desktop manages and represents its information and the applications that people use other than through manual labor. It is in the interests of any company who controls a market to keep the pace of change slow, is Sun the one to break this cycle?

    1. Re:desktop disparity by dash2 · · Score: 1

      For all the talk of new technology and pace of change, the real pace of change is incredibly bad. Conventional wisdom equates change with the constant appearance of new technologies. Real change is seen in technology that increase productivity at the commodity level. The desktop is the commodity and applications are a response to peoples need to process information. The integration between the two is pathetic Other than at a superficial level - quote whatever new schemes you like - there is no linking between how the desktop manages and represents its information and the applications that people use other than through manual labor. It is in the interests of any company who controls a market to keep the pace of change slow, is Sun the one to break this cycle?

      Wow, a Chomskybot for /. posting. Have you got source code for that?

      dave

  26. They, err, he, was there by amorphosamon · · Score: 2, Informative

    Someone was there. They didn't have any decorations or such. I didn't even talk to the guy. Then again, Sun didn't really make an effort to have a booth either. In fact, they weren't there at all the first day.

    --
    religion != morality
  27. Re:Linux: My Observations(Certified MS Professiona by big+daddy+kane · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    how is that a troll? becuase the commenter's opinion is different than the mods?

  28. Re:Linux: My Observations(Certified MS Professiona by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You are what most people here would call a troll, but I'm going to respond to your statements. In reverse order. If you are indeed a troll, MS is going to have a lot of fun with your abuse of their certificates, but I doubt you are one.

    First, let me explain my personal POV: I use Windows. I see that Microsoft is the de facto standard and respect them for making good, usable software products. I do support Free software because I think it's "cool", but some of the stuff is just a pain to use.

    GFDL licensing: About the most anyone would want to copy is the facts, which aren't copyrighted. Besides, you need to post a copy of the GFDL to use it (yuck); you may be better of with Creative Commons, if you're going to license your posts at all (which no one I've seen here does, despite their love of free licensing).

    Torvalds the hacker? He uses hacker in a different sense, admittedly not the mainstream sense. He avoids using the word "hacker" in published news articles because his interpretation of the word is a positive thing (one who, like you, enjoys coding wiht computers), rather than the common sense of one who breaks into computers. I really wish they'd pick another term for computer/programming enthusiasts so as to avoid the negative connotations.

    I would question why you trust a company that is profitable; it just shows they have business sense. Torvalds on the other hand releases all his code for public review. Who would you trust more: a company with a profit motive, or a programmer whose code has been widely peer-reviewed?

    Besides, as he readily admits, he isn't writing the majority of Linux code these days, and anyway he only writes the kernel. Most software that's called "Linux" is really just random free software that happens to work with Linux.

    And Linus Torvalds is an employee of Transmeta, a well-known CPU maker.

    Red Hat is a marketer, not the server. I assume Apache is the server you're using. I'd like to see your data, because the setup may not be optimal; open-source servers normally come configured for development, not deployment. Besides, the times for static content may be so small that a millisecond difference may amount to 276%.

    Windows admittedly installs a heck of a lot faster and easier, but none of the software comes with it, and it's hard to configure. Linux solutions offer much more customizability and power at the expense of user-friendliness.

    What is "development costs"? Cost of paying employees? They may be better qualified. Besides, J2EE isn't really open-source, it's probably just espoused by the radical (non-evil-)hacker community for being "not Microsoft".

    IIS and Apache (I don't know what you mean by Linux 7.0, I assume you mean Red Hat 7.0, an older version that is based around a Linux 2.x core and probably includes Apache) don't put any particular constraints on costs; after all, if it's the same web page you're hosting, it's the same amount of data being sent.

    Windows is more well-known, and training Windows is much cheaper, I'll grant you that. I wouldn't recommend Linux-based desktops for the average employees, simply because they have most likely been born and raised into the Windows culture. However, if by LinuxOS you mean LindowsOS, I'll give you my opinion of that: dirty marketer taking free Linux, adding pretty colors, and overpricing everything. There's no need for Linspire to cost more than Windows itself.

    Imagine yourself as an impartial viewer: would you trust someone with Microsoft certificates giving facts in support of Microsoft products? I wouldn't even trust Linux people if they claim their product is better than MS's with just statistics. (For example, MS Office on the Mac is native. OpenOffice.org uses X and takes way too long to load. I believe, however, that OOo will at some point pass up Office, so I'll use it if that happens or seems close to happening.)

    Bad karma: Don't attack Linux viciously, Slashdot people are touchy. Post your statements as a question, and pretend to want to be converted, and they won't hate you.

    (y35, I |n0w 3y3'v3 1ik31y b33n +r0113d, but one can dream, no?)

  29. Re:Somehow I'm pretty sure Mandrake was missing .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I'll deny it.

    I found Mandrake 9.2 to be fairly buggy and easy to confuse. Try changing to/from GMT in the hwclock sometime. Try calling your optical disks something other than CDROM0, CDROM1, CDROM2, etc. sometime. Try running their framebuffered version of VNC sometime and explain why it runs 10x slower than vanilla VNC?

    I'm just an AC, so don't listen to me, but Mandrake shouldn't market themselves until they get a distribution that has more than skin-deep beauty.

  30. Re:Linux: My Observations(Certified MS Professiona by grammarama · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    good call

    --
    suckers
  31. Irregardless is not a word by h198x · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Use spell check. That's what it's for.

    1. Re:Irregardless is not a word by sl0ppy · · Score: 3, Informative

      it's nonstandard, but it is a word. it entered common usage in the early 20th century, and has been accepted in most dictionaries since a little past 1927.

      irregardless is synonymous with regardless.

    2. Re:Irregardless is not a word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a coloquialism. That doesn't make it proper fucknut (see, that's another coloquialism....people understand what it's supposed to mean, but it's not a legitimate word).

    3. Re:Irregardless is not a word by Almond+Tree · · Score: 0

      Like infamous and famous
      inflammable and flammable

      Obviously it should be inregardless.

      *bows*

      --

      bau bau chicka chicka mau mau

    4. Re:Irregardless is not a word by h198x · · Score: 0

      Sure, let's all use improper English. In fact, why bother taking English in school at all? I'm willing to bet that you're one of those knuckleheads that is too lazy to figure out how to set the clock in the VCR, so it just blinks 12:00 constantly. We should encourage others to exceed, not just get by, like you obviously do. Knucklehead.

  32. Irregardless by operagost · · Score: 1, Redundant
    Irregardless
    So did this guy mean "irrespective" or "regardless"? Sorry, I'm just really sick of this one.
    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  33. Re:Linux: My Observations(Certified MS Professiona by Daengbo · · Score: 1

    It's a cut-n-paste job. You wasted your time answering.

  34. Re:Linux: My Observations(Certified MS Professiona by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

    A "Yo' Mama" joke (at least in spirit, if not in spelling) was modded Insightful, yet a comment on the nonexistence of "irregardless" was modded offtopic? The latter at least was more intelligent.

  35. Re:Linux: My Observations(Certified MS Professiona by LnxAddct · · Score: 1

    Guys guys guys... I think your missing the joke. Look at the names "Linux 7.0" and "LinuxOS", etc... Look at the exaggerated and blatanlty false percentages and statistics. Then the GNU copyright notice at the bottom, this isn't a troll its a joke, but I've seen this on /. before a few months back, so it is redundant, but not a troll. Just thought I'd clear things up. I'm surprised BillCrayMCSD hasn't replied yet to correct these people.
    Regards,
    Steve

  36. Irregardless? by blake213 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    "Irregardless isn't even a word"
    "yes it is, it means without lack of regard"

    --
    mund freud.
  37. Software installation by Neo-Rio-101 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If they want ideas to talk about instead of continuing to bleat that this year is the year of Linux on the desktop (It's not yet), I'll give them a few. * Better hardware support. I have some new motherboards which don't work under Linux because the ATI northbridge chips in them aren't detected. This is ATIs fault as much as Linux's - but it's slowing acceptance. We need more vendors writing drivers for Linux. * Better software installation, etc. The great thing about Linux is customisability. Thing is, it's a pain for most users, and is a pain for me even though I can use a command line. Something needs to be done about it. Something like an add/remove program tab to keep track of packages/source code. Standard libraries that all desktop linux should have. Better interfaces between this code and the desktop etc. Half the time you'll never know what's in your machine until you look, and THEN you have to know where it is, and what package it is, and what that package is for, and what depends on it etc.etc. In a perfect world, a newbie user should be able to compile a source coded package for a desktop distro with a single click, with seamless configure && make && make install.... as if it were an MSI install package.

    --
    READY.
    PRINT ""+-0
    1. Re:Software installation by The+Almighty+Dave · · Score: 1

      If they really want something to discuss, they could spend some time talking about the the word "irregardless".

    2. Re:Software installation by alienw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What distro are you using? My copy of Mandrake 10 comes with a shitload of precompiled packages and includes a nice graphical package app to manage and install them. Also, newbies should NEVER have to compile source code. That's what binaries are for. What we really do need is something like an extension of the LSB that would provide a standard binary API that is consistent across versions and distributions.

    3. Re:Software installation by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      I have some new motherboards which don't work under Linux because the ATI northbridge chips in them aren't detected. This is ATIs fault as much as Linux's - but it's slowing acceptance.

      Slightly off topic, but when you go send a friendly note to ATI asking for Linux support, ask for Open Source software. Proprietary drivers aren't good enough.

      Your choice of operating system should not be based on what hardware you happen to have. A proliferation of binary-only drivers for Linux is going to stifle usage of other systems like FreeBSD. Do you really want Linux to "win" the same way Windows did, through hardware lock-in?

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
  38. Is now... by Geminus · · Score: 1

    Microsoft Word and the english unabridged dictionary seems to think it is. Maybe it means that a person has exceptionaly less regard or actually does regard? M R Ducks

  39. wrong Re:Irregardless is not a word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    half of the dictionaries list it
    Usage Note: Irregardless is a word that many mistakenly believe to be correct usage in formal style, when in fact it is used chiefly in nonstandard speech or casual writing. Coined in the United States in the early 20th century, it has met with a blizzard of condemnation for being an improper yoking of irrespective and regardless and for the logical absurdity of combining the negative ir- prefix and -less suffix in a single term. Although one might reasonably argue that it is no different from words with redundant affixes like debone and unravel, it has been considered a blunder for decades and will probably continue to be so.

  40. Re:Linux: My Observations(Certified MS Professiona by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 2, Informative

    > > Bad karma: Don't attack Linux viciously

    > (Score:-1, Flamebait)

    I couldn't've said it better myself. ;-)

  41. I support this post. by gumpish · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I show my support for this post by replying logged-in.

  42. The Video Professor would kick yer butt by gatkinso · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    for dissing his lines.

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
  43. Re:Somehow I'm pretty sure Mandrake was missing .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From my experience, Mandrake 9.1 was a lot better than 9.2

  44. Re:COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I must say I'm dismayed by these younger trolls' disrespect for the hard labor of their colleagues. BillGrayMCSD needs to have an ungreased Yoda doll inserted anally and horizontally.

    All hail Mike Bouma, for he is the true MS Office Specialist and widely respected Amigan!

  45. Re:Linux: My Observations(Certified MS Professiona by mbrinkm · · Score: 1

    OK, I'll bite. Here is how you know the parent of your post is a troll.

    First: SEVERAL INDEPENDENT RESEARCH INSTITUTES

    Who exactly are these independent institutes?

    Second: LinuxOS

    What exactly is LinuxOS, I know that the Linux kernal is the basis of many distros, I've never heard of one named LinuxOS though.

    Third: Linux 7.0 webserver

    I've never heard of this application before. Linux itself is at 2.6, but the main webserver is Apache. So what exactly is this idiot talking about?

    Fourth: * $40.25 per megabit of throughput per second. * $1.79 per peak request per second.

    Numbers thrown out for shock value that have no explanation on how they arrived at those numbers and the numbers themselves don't mean dick. "per megabit of throughput per second" - Really, How was that tested? Was this throughput for a network connection, or was it for disc writes? Was the hardware identical? What exactly does "$1.79 per peak request per second" mean? It doesn't tell me anything.

    And finally, the telltale sign that the post was a troll: opensores in the place of opensource.

    And, after all that, I can't believe that I took the bait to explain how the idiot is a troll.

    --
    "Don't worry about people stealing an idea. If it's original, you will have to ram it down their throats." --Howard Aike
  46. Re:Linux: My Observations(Certified MS Professiona by LordK3nn3th · · Score: 1

    Usually the last CDs contain only optional stuff like that.

    --

    ---
    Never criticize religion on Slashdot. You will be modded down for "Troll" no matter how factual it is.
  47. Re:Somehow I'm pretty sure Mandrake was missing .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why would you want to do any of the things in your post? hardly a problem with mandrake!!

  48. Nathaniel is a cutie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Definately the youngest looking person there (but i know he's in his late 20s). He was also the most enthusiatic. Most people were simply selling their companies. He actually talked about GNU/Linux in general, and mentioned that what truely drived its progress was the passion for a custom operating system, and not the hate for Redmond. I really like that.

    It was funny to watch him exchange verbal blows with Robert Lewis. You could totally tell they did *not* like eachother. Lewis kept cutting him off.

    (paraphrased)
    "Nat is kinda young, so he might not remember when..."
    "And you're kinda old"
    (crowd laughed, they both "smiled", but you can totally tell it was war)

    I *really really really* wanted to talk to him, but he seemed to always be running around (not to mention he made me nervous), so during that panel i took notice of the fact that he was chatting...

    Hail Ethereal! Hail Ettercap! Hail aimsniff!

    I didn't want to read his messages, I just wanted to get his handle.

    He's a smart guy, when I messaged him he realized I had intecepted his packets, so his first message was:

    "You've been reading my messages, you jerk" :(

    When i finally told him who i was, he stopped talking. I think he thought I was coming on to him. You know, in that gay kinda way...

    Oh well. On other notes, Doc Searls (Linux Journal) was pretty funny (he was using a PowerBook of all things), and GarageGames gets the award for best presentation (after Nat's of course.) Ian Murdock *vanished* after the speech that proceeded his.

    Linspire takes the prize for being the most user friendly linux distribution i've ever used. Looks and feels like windows. A nice GUI frontend to apt-get. A near clone of apple's iTunes called Lsongs (very nice, download the source NOW). They tweeked Mozilla so it has all the plugins working on install. What scares me is the fact that you are logged in as #.

    Linspire has plenty of potential, maybe not here, but in the 3rd world market it seems they will beat M$ to the ground. According to Robertson, their computers outsell M$ based computers at Elektra, mexico's largest electronics chain.

    My tip: never use IM/FTP/Email at a conference unless you are using SSL/SSH/Kereberos or anything of that nature. :)

  49. MOD PARENT FUNNY PLEASE!. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come on mods, it's a good troll, and not even off-topic.

    The normal consumer associates Linux with a sucicidal friendless nerd from some godforsaken corner of Northern Europe, a plainly insane right wing lunatic, and an "alternative lifestyle" Communist throwback to Woodstock with a facial hair problem.

    :) Awesome.

    1. Re:MOD PARENT FUNNY PLEASE!. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Actually, in this discussion it's both on-topic and insightful. And funny.

    2. Re:MOD PARENT FUNNY PLEASE!. by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      Actually, the "Normal Consumer" has never heard of Linux, and thinks "MS Windows" means "Word". They also think Windows is part of the hardware, and don't know how to lift the bonnet of their car.

      The people who believe as described in that post are far better informed, which is not very good news.

      However, its not all "doom and gloom" the number of people who use Linux today greatly exceeds the number who had used a computer in 1980. Very few Linux users would go back to Windows without bloodshed. Most Windows users would go anywhere if led by the nose.

      Us *BSD users stick to our guns. ... John Wayne, in the "The day a car rental firm won the west"

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
  50. Re:Linux: My Observations(Certified MS Professiona by TedCheshireAcad · · Score: 0, Redundant

    This is the best troll I've seen in a while. Really, brilliant. Bravo, sir.

  51. This year, last year.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...or all summits combined?

  52. Some things missing from the article by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

    Where was this Linux Desktop Summit? Is this a regular event? How may one attend?

  53. irregardless? by joeysmith · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Perhaps you meant "regardless"? Or maybe it was "irrespective" you were looking for? REGARDLESS, I think "irregardless" is generally considered a nonsensical word.

  54. Re:I left with 4 shirts and 6 bottles of maple syr by name773 · · Score: 1

    ever see Super Troopers?
    chug! chug! chug!

  55. But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    ...I'm the archetypal IT Guy(tm) who moved to a rural area to escape PHBs. Naturally the work is nothing difficult, mostly Windoze donkey work for the locals, with the occasional slightly-more-demanding job for an energy company or whathaveyou tossed in now and then. And I agree with you that Linux would be a great alternative for most people who want to do nothing more with their PC than send an e-mail to their sister, or browse a few websites.

    Unfortunately there's one fly in that soup. Games! That's the problem. It's not browsers, or mail clients, or office applications or multimedia players, all of which are available in generally superior versions for Linux. It's games.

    I'd save everybody a vast amount of aggravation if I could just install Linux and be done with it, but I can't because most people have games they want to play, and they won't run under Linux.

    And I'm not just referring to kids: most of the over 50s around here have MS Flight Simulator (we live near a large airfiled, and are surrounded by pilots, ex-pilots, wannabe pilots, etc); they've often spent hours and hours downloading big mods for it over crappy dial-up lines and they aren't going to like being told that they wasted the effort.

    Nor do the vast majority of Windows users want to dual boot: they will say, quite reasonably, "why should I have to do that?"...

  56. Re:Linux: My Observations(Certified MS Professiona by ahowlett · · Score: 1

    As Bill Gray demonstrates, the biggest obstacle to linux/FOSS deployment on the desktop will be the local admins who have a huge personal investment in the status quo.

  57. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  58. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  59. Re:Linux: My Observations(Certified MS Professiona by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

    Yeah, but "irregardless" is in the dictionary. So really, they're all trolls.

    --
    Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
  60. Re:Linux: My Observations(Certified MS Professiona by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

    If that's what they think about Fedora, imagine what they think about Debian!

    --
    Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
  61. Re:Linux: My Observations(Certified MS Professiona by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's Mike Bourna's brilliant troll, but this guy put his own name in the (c) notice. Lowlife leeches.

  62. Re:Linux: My Observations(Certified MS Professiona by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've seen the exact same post several times over the last 2 years too.
    =TROLL

  63. The path of Linux is the path of Google by antic · · Score: 1

    The path of Linux is the path of Google.

    I believe that Google's popularity as a search engine increased by way of word of mouth from cluey computer users (not necessarily geeks, but people that install their own hardware, muck around with applications and that sort of thing) who consistently received quality search results in a time when the previous kings (altavista, yahoo, etc) were starting to become bloated and returning rubbish.

    I know that many people I know now rely on Google without ever using another search engine because they've found out that it's what I use, or I've recommended it.

    Linux will likely follow the same path, and so (as is obvious) success will come when Linux strongly meets the needs of prosumers, advanced computer users, etc. So, you're right -- hardware support is essential. Flawless support of digital cameras is essential.

    It's great for some here to say that people will become turned off Windows because of spyware and worms, but I suspect they'll turn to their advanced pals and learn about SpyBot and AdAware before they strip their machine bare, try to choose or locate a new operating system and take the plunge into learning how it works.

    Because, the fact is, with Windows Update, SpyBot, AdAware, a virus checker like AVG, and commonsense, Windows is pretty decent, and definitely "good enough" for the majority.

    --
    'Thats they exact same thing a banana wrench monkey.'
    1. Re:The path of Linux is the path of Google by DF5JT · · Score: 1

      " The path of Linux is the path of Google."

      I think so, too. Linux is going to be hijacked by cheap commercial entities, because it's giving them something for free that they would have to pay for dearly otherwise. Linux on the desktop will essentially be marketed by cheap companies that do not want the hassle of a separate development department, Linspire being the perfect example.

      Did Linspire give anything back to the Open Source community? No, they're just profiting from free giveaways and laughing their asses of at all these idiots who love to work for free.

      Same with Google. It's the El Cheapos, mainly the spammers and porn industry that profits from bending Google search results the way they want it - for free.

  64. Re:COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

    1. Find infringing troll post
    2. Pull poster into court
    3. ???
    4. Get two trolls off Slashdot
    5. PROFIT!!!

  65. Re:Linux: My Observations(Certified MS Professiona by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Debian Netinst = 30 megs
    apt-get only what you need
    use the unstable tree and everything is up to date.

    Dipshit.

  66. Re:Somehow I'm pretty sure Mandrake was missing .. by One+Louder · · Score: 2, Interesting
    There was a Mandrake guy there in a 10x10 booth with a tiny sign. He pretty much introduced himself as "one of the two guys left standing in the United States" after the layoff bloodbath and would mention the Mandrake bankruptcy and trademark lawsuit in the first couple of sentences when discussing the company.

    I use Mandrake 9 myself, and I'm no marketing genius, but I have to say this was not exactly the best way to build any confidence in the future of the distribution.

  67. Epson care about screwing linux users too!!! by B747SP · · Score: 1
    FTA: My first stop was Epson's free printer raffle... Interesting to see that they cared about Linux and driver support.

    Drivers are nice and all, but you still get an Epson printer. A printer that dries up the print heads in a few days and uses half a cartridge of ink cleaning itself, a printer that cleans itself even if it isn't 'dirty', a printer that uses multi-colour cartridges that need to be replaced when you run out of just one colour, a printer with chipped cartridges that can't be refilled without much mucking around, a printer that interrogates the print cartridges to make sure that Epson got their pound of flesh out of you today, and a pricing model that says "Here take this free printer, we'll screw you later on consumables".

    Yup, it sure is interesting to see that Epson like the money that comes out of linux users' pockets just as much as they like Windows users' money.

    --
    I find your ideas intriguing and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
    1. Re:Epson care about screwing linux users too!!! by khb · · Score: 1

      Many of the Epson photo printers have individual ink tanks per color (and have for a few releases).

      Pantone, and others have cartridges which work (indeed, there's even a set of shades of grey for folks doing pure b&w photography).

      The archival quality of the Epson branded inks is state of the art.

      Even a 2 year old Epson is quite good: http://www.steves-digicams.com/2002_reviews/epson_ 2200.html

      Admittedly we went with a kodak dyesub instead, but I know serious photo professionals who swear by their Epsons.

    2. Re:Epson care about screwing linux users too!!! by jimicus · · Score: 1

      Are you trolling or just ill-informed?

      Epson Stylus C64/C84/R200/R300/R800 - all have one cartridge per colour.

      I've used many epson printers and IME it takes several weeks/months before they dry out.

      The chip is only for the printer to keep track of how much ink is left in the cartridge - it doesn't identify the cartridge as being genuine. The chip may not keep an accurate record of how much ink is left but that's a separate matter.

  68. Re:Linux: My Observations(Certified MS Professiona by eltoyoboyo · · Score: 1

    You are shouting at the wrong crowd. It does not matter how right you are. With a Microsft certificate in hand, Slashdotters are going to mod you down. It is like cheering "Go Bears" in a Green Bay pub. Just be thankful that you made some zealots burn their mod points on you.

    --
    Have you Meta Moderated t
  69. Let me get this straight by bonch · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You're declaring an economic upswing of dot-coms because Novell is giving away free t-shirts?

    1. Re:Let me get this straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You're declaring an economic upswing of dot-coms because Novell is giving away free t-shirts?

      Actually this could be a perfectly rational indicator.


      Stock prices, at any moment, reflect all the information which is known to Wall Street. If you have one piece of info not known to Wall Street analysts, you have an edge that can make you money.


      I wouldn't bet the farm on the Free T-Shirt Indicator, but it's probably worth more than you think.
  70. Re:Linux: My Observations(Certified MS Professiona by Joey7F · · Score: 1

    That is because the mods are unpredictable...

    Actually that is not true, the mods are highly predictable. This will get modded up because of that mention.

    Also, the difference between -1 Flamebait and +5 Funny is the mood of the reader.

    --Joey

  71. Re:Linux: My Observations(Certified MS Professiona by Snoopy77 · · Score: 1

    Bill Gray, MCSE, MCDST, MS Office Specialist

    I say you are wrong and I have the sufficient number of letters after my name to prove it.

    Sen. Sir John Wilson III, BCompSci, PLO, KKK, SDA, IRA, OBE

    --
    "She's a West Texas girl, just like me" - G.W Bush Iraqis
  72. Slashdotters LOVE to say this by bonch · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Actually, I'd disagree on both points. Most people wouldn't notice if you swapped Windows XP and XPde on their machines until they realized that their desktop had been running for a couple of months without a virus attack bringing their system to its knees.

    Yeah, until they went to Wal-mart, brought home a printer, and realized sticking in the Autoplay installer CD does nothing.

    Or they tried to install the latest Sims expansion.

    Or they wanted to fire up Yahoo Messenger, so they go to the website and download it, unable to install it and blaming it on Windows.

    Or they look for "My Documents" or "\Windows\System."

    Or...you get the idea. Hell, Linux doesn't even have a binary installation/uninstallation API for its desktops. I don't want to have to rely on GUI hacks like Synaptic or xterm "apt-get" solutions. Give me installer APIs! Why the hell is this being overlooked in favor of more sidebar buttons for KDE or redesigned file selector dialogs in GTK?

    1. Re:Slashdotters LOVE to say this by killjoe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why would an end user want an installer API?

      If people don't want choices companies are happy to take the choices away for them. Redhat, sun, linspire and to lesser extent suse all give the user a cohesive system with a pre-chosen set of software. The user does not ever have to think of what desktop or browser to use because there is one default one installed. They all also handle updating and installing transparently for the user. This is especially powerful with click n run where the user is presented with a list of available software and they click on the one they want and it installs magically for them.

      I really don't understant your point of denying users choice. Maybe you mean users should not even have the option of installing software that competes with the defaults. Is that it? Should they be prevented from surfing the web and finding alternatives or should they be prevented from installing alternatives if they want to try one?

      --
      evil is as evil does
    2. Re:Slashdotters LOVE to say this by tempest303 · · Score: 1

      heh... your sig, "Current Linux desktops won't succeed because people DON'T WANT endless choices" is funny. You know there's a whole Linux desktop that understands that principle? It's called GNOME - maybe you've heard of it? :-)

      As for installers, that's a breeze compared to building something like RPM, which is already done. Give it time - it'll come. For now, the consumer is not a primary target for Linux - limited application environments are, like call centers. The much drooled after Home Desktop will come, but it's at least a year or two off.

    3. Re:Slashdotters LOVE to say this by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 2, Funny
      realized sticking in the Autoplay installer CD does nothing

      Probably not a big deal, since they already asked me to disable that god-awful autoplay feature

      so they go to the website and download it, unable to install it and blaming it on Windows

      You might want to tell them not to install Ford parts on the Mercedes as well.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    4. Re:Slashdotters LOVE to say this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps if you took their Mercedes and swapped it with a Ford that was designed to look like a Mercedes, you'd have a point. But you don't. That's because you're stupid.

  73. I hate bad grammar. by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Irregardless of what you call it

    In other words, REGARDING what you call it.

    This is almost as bad as people saying, "That's not unlike this," or whatever, when all you have to say is, "That's like this." Or worse, when people say, "I could care less," when what they actually mean, if they want to say that they don't care at all, is, "I could NOT care less." People are just so stupid. It all stems from the educational system, which completely and utterly sucks. Respect used to be with the teacher. What the teacher said, went. Teachers had the authority to discipline children. But not anymore. Teachers have to be afraid to say the wrong word, or look at some student the wrong way, or use the wrong tone of voice, or they'll get fired and end up on the national news for being "prejudiced" against some child. What a bunch of bullshit! It reminds me of airport security. They WON'T search someone who looks middle eastern because they might get offended, but they WILL search some nun or some child who comes through because they want to appear FAIR. In other words, they SAY they don't want to discriminate, but this behavior IS DISCRIMINATION!!!!! Discrimination works both ways! You can discriminate in order to benefit someone, or in order to unbenefit someone. But no, they won't see it this way, just as nobody sees the absurdity of schools sucking, and when the children fail the tests, because the school did a shitty job of teaching them, the state gets rid of the tests, instead of making the schools teach better.

    Do you agree with some of what I've said in this post? If you're a U.S. citizen, write in Ralph Nader on the November 2004 ballot. Voting outside the "traditional" Democrat/Republican parties is the only way to fix this country.

  74. Re:Linux: My Observations(Certified MS Professiona by Otter · · Score: 1
    And Linus Torvalds is an employee of Transmeta, a well-known CPU maker.

    No, he's not and hasn't been for months.

    If you're going to write a saga in response to an obvious cut'n'paste troll, at least get your facts straight.

  75. Because you probably use AntiVirus... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...something which is unecessary on real operating systems.

    Also I'm sure you are ultra careful when visiting certain sites, and avoid doing things which will lead to infestation. These are also things which aren't issues with real operating systems.

    And then there's the mail client problem; You'd have made sure you have HTML and preview off, and closely monitor all attachments, in order to avoid those nasty viruses.

    And patches! Don't forget the critical update patches! Every week now, isn't it? What fun.

    Since I don't use Windows, instead preferring to work with a real operating system, I don't have such concerns.

    Having watched the progression -- and lack of real progress -- by Microsoft since MS-DOS, I won't be changing my stance anytime soon.

    1. Re:Because you probably use AntiVirus... by westlake · · Score: 2, Informative
      Of course I use anti-virus.
      But I don't know of any operating system that is perfectly secure and maintains free out of the box.

      Also I'm sure you are ultra careful when visiting certain sites, and avoid doing things which will lead to infestation.

      Not particularly. There are some simple, practical, barriers erected through the options in IE6, Norton and others. Regrettably, my interests and tastes rarely lead me to sites that would be dangerous.

      And then there's the mail client problem; You'd have made sure you have HTML and preview off, and closely monitor all attachments, in order to avoid those nasty viruses

      HTML is on, and preview, and no harm done. I know my correspondents, after all. Outlook Express hasn't allowed executables to be opened in quite some time.

      And patches! Don't forget the critical update patches! Every week now, isn't it? What fun.

      Patches are generally once a month, and the process is automated. Trivial, really, over a broadband connection. Nothing to obsess over.

      preferring to work with a real operating system, I don't have such concerns. Having watched the progression -- and lack of real progress -- by Microsoft since MS-DOS, I won't be changing my stance anytime soon.

      As you chose. But the oldest programs on my system are the Infocom games and Commander Keen and the newest Paint Shop Pro 8. That's not a bad run for O/S that you have never considered quite real.
  76. Your a moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Diction ary&va=Irregardless+&x=21&y=21

    You are a moron and an Etat-Unians its expected of you to think with you foot in your mouth your not an american

    1. Re:Your a moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dear m0r0n,

      irreglardless

      YOU'RE != your
      its != it's
      you != your

      your sentence is a run-on

      irreglardless suxx0rz -- so do YOU !!!!

  77. 1995 atari show "we're here to stay" say vendors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1995 atari show "we're here to stay" say vendors

  78. Re:I left with 4 shirts and 6 bottles of maple syr by tricops · · Score: 1

    Ahhhhhhhhhhhh!!! no, I didn't need mental images of that one guy covered in flour and whatever else in the cell/room/whatever... thanks so much for reminding me of that movie :P

    --
    (\(\
    (^v^)
    (")")
    This is the cute vorpal bunny virus, copy to your sig or runaway, runaway in fear!
  79. Ideal Linux desktop by Openstandards.net · · Score: 1
    I'm going to help a friend buy a new computer and install Linux on it. She doesn't have experience with Windows, so there won't be a change.

    However, I can't decide which distro is best. I'm not as concerned about usability, since the apps are where usability is the issue, and they'll be the same regardless of the distro. What I'm concerned about is not having to support it after it's running, ease of installation of new software (for a newbie), and the ability to have it automatically receive errata updates.

    I am a bit shocked that for this piece of news, have the comments are about "irregardless"; and no one is talking about the distros and experiences helping newbies use Linux on the desktop.

    So, what distro is best for a newbie to computers that addresses the three issues I listed above?

    1. Re:Ideal Linux desktop by Red+Alastor · · Score: 1

      I'm satisfied with Fedora Core 1. It's pretty easy to install and manage. But if you can wait one or two weeks, Fedora Core 2 Final will be available. They are making the last tests on it. For updates, there is blue circle that is checked in the bottom right corner when no update is available and it turns to a red one with a ! when updates are suggested. You can install rpm just by clicking double-clicking on them (every newbie know how to do that) but you can also use Yum, it will download applications from the net and resolve dependencies. To install FireFox for exemple the command is : yum install firefox No need to "sync" or similar, it is done automatically. yum is the only command I suggest teaching to a newbie when installing the distro and it's easy to use.

      --
      Slashdot anagrams to "Sad Sloth"
    2. Re:Ideal Linux desktop by no-arg+constructor · · Score: 1

      it seems the consensus is that mandrake 10 and suse (don't remember the version) are the best starter desktops. i haven't messed with fedora (just got the confidence to try and install gentoo from stage 1). from when i used to use mandrake i didn't have any "basic" problems. web, email, sound, graphics, all that went without a hitch.

  80. It's not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    irregardless, it's regardless.

    You must have broken your English teacher's heart.

  81. You have no idea how funny your post is by qwijibrumm · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's really ironic how you sound like a grammar nazi, and proceed into a nonsensical rambling with no paragraph breaks, or even a logical thought process. This is not unlike the way a fifth grade student writes. Writing should be clear and tend to revolve around a single point. You seem to jump from point A to point Q. Personally, I could care less. This is just a goofy geek forum website. Irregardless of this fact, your hypocrisy was just too priceless to pass up.

    Now, notice the use of ironic here. It is used in a roughly correct manner. You intended to blast horrible writing, but created horrible writing in the process. Some could argue that this is still not irony, but it is at least a decent use of the word.

    "This is not unlike" is a valid phrase. It highlights that there are few things dissimilar. The phrase "This is like" would tend to highlight the similarities. It all depends on the tone, and what you would like to highlight.

    The saying, "I could care less," means, "I care for some reason. I have the capacity and capability to not care. As a matter of fact, I'm not sure why I care." Whereas, "I could not care less," simply means, "I don't care at all."

    "Irregardless" is a word. It means "regardless." And while I agree that it should not be used outside familiar conversation, it is not considered a double negative. But as shown with "This is not unlike," even double negatives have a place. Now it's time for someone to blast me on my misuse of commas or something.

    --
    I wish there was some there was some way that I could be outside playing basketball, in the rain, and not get wet.
    1. Re:You have no idea how funny your post is by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 1
      Now it's time for someone to blast me on my misuse of commas or something.

      Yes, as a matter of fact, you stated, "Now, notice the use of ironic here," when, I presume, you meant to say "irony" in place of "ironic." I assure you that the erroneous grammar, spelling, and punctuation were not employed in error, but rather because I just love to write as crappily as possible when passing judgment on others' writing.

      I am well aware of the minor differences between things like "not unlike" and "like" or "I could care less" and "I couldn't care less" but I am complaining about their misuse (when it is obvious that the speaker or writer intends a different meaning).

      I'm glad you saw the irony in all of that.

  82. Re:Linux: My Observations(Certified MS Professiona by krumms · · Score: 1

    He uses hacker in a different sense, admittedly not the mainstream sense. He avoids using the word "hacker" in published news articles because his interpretation of the word is a positive thing (one who, like you, enjoys coding wiht computers), rather than the common sense of one who breaks into computers. I really wish they'd pick another term for computer/programming enthusiasts so as to avoid the negative connotations.

    Hmm ... "coders" and "hackers" ... let's call ourselves "cockers"!

  83. Mandrake Booth Anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Overall the convention was ok. The speakers simply trying to pedal their wares was pretty old pretty fast. Congrats Sun, for more demonstration, less bullshit speeches. Whomever only gave them a half hour was really acting the fool. Anyone notice the Mandrake guy day 2? He left around noon it seemed like. Some asshole kids took over his booth, and apparently ate his cookies. They kept spouting off about Gentoo, and added a post-it note to the mandrake sign that made it read "Not Mandrake Software". I don't think the Mandrake guy noticed he was sitting 2 feet infront of the WAP. Next year hook Sun up with more speaking time.

  84. Re:Somehow I'm pretty sure Mandrake was missing .. by strider_starslayer · · Score: 1

    but anyone can get GUI-frontend everything by simply installing Webmin (which is a throughly useful program that should come installed with every distro and enabled for local access for root only by default) and going to 127.0.0.1:10000

    --
    -Millions of Monkeys, Millions of typewriters, 6 hours of sorting through faeces encrusted pages to find: This post
  85. Re:Linux: My Observations(Certified MS Professiona by ComaVN · · Score: 1

    use the unstable tree and everything is up to date.

    That sounds so wrong.

    --
    Be wary of any facts that confirm your opinion.
  86. Re:I left with 4 shirts and 6 bottles of maple syr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What, exactly, makes a pen "trippy"? Just curious.

  87. Conjecture by hey! · · Score: 1

    "The total amount of computions used in supporting this slashdot digression on "irregardless" exceeds the total number of machine computations performed in 19__."

    Depending on how you fill in the blank, the above statement can be true (e.g. "00") or false (e.g. "99").

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    1. Re:Conjecture by Reglar_Joe · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't that be "number" instead of "amount?"

  88. Re:Linux: My Observations(Certified MS Professiona by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Unlike most people who spout off at this site, I have the certificates to prove this
    agreed!

    (c) Frag Star HL, CS, RPG, FPS Specialist

  89. Re:COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Sorry. I thought that violating the GFDL would increase the troll factor. I will be careful to credit you in the future.

    Posting as AC as that acct's karma has hit "terrible" after just the ONE post! AND I had to change my IP address!

  90. ratpoison.sf.net??? by advocate_one · · Score: 1
    An error occurred while loading http://ratpoison.sf.net/:

    Unknown host ratpoison.sf.net

    where are they now??? try here!!! but their homepage is borked...

    --
    Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
  91. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  92. Linux Desktop Summit - the facts by pvdl · · Score: 1
    I attended the 2nd annual Linux Desktop Summit, in San Diego last week. Here are some of my takeaway impressions.

    As an aside, I went to this summit because I am working on the definitive book to help Windows home users start using Linux. If you have any suggestions for material, or want to help with feedback or in other ways, please email me.

    • There were a couple of hundred attendees, from around the world. There were many different perspectives represented.
    • Michael Robertson commented that there were 2x as many attendees as last year.
    • A huge disappointment - Jef Raskin (father of Mac sw) was a no show for his keynote opening talk.
    • Sun Microsystems appeared very briefly in their booth for a few minutes at the start of day one, took down their sign and apparently went home. Unclear what that was about. They could at least have made an effort to demo the Sun Java Desktop. They did not give any talks.
    • Games on Linux is in amazingly good shape, considering that it is the 6th in line for a games port, after PS/2, Xbox, game cube, Windows, MacOS, then finally Linux. There were demos of terrific games, including two I plan to buy right now: Dark Horizons Lore (Mech Warrior inspired), and Think Tanks.
    • Microsoft succeeded in harrassing Lindows enough that they have changed the product name to "Linspire". The company name remains as Lindows. Microsoft has a track record of hijacking ordinary words as trademarks: Project, Word, Windows, Office. They are not supposed to be able to do this, but they have enough money to exhaust all challengers. The US government was irresponsible in not regulating Microsoft, the way all other monopolies (power, water, phone, etc) are regulated.
    • Low cost is a major advantage that is driving Linux in the third world. A lot of Linux action will be outside the USA in the coming years. The $200 Bangalore-based Simputer runs on Linux.

      Bendt Kretschmer (German author and journalist who called me an "imperialist" at lunch when I spoke in favor of stopping offshoring of software jobs) estimated that the true desktop share of Linux in Germany is 6%. Microsoft is automatically less popular as it is an American, not European, company (I guess there's a little bit of Imperialism in everyone, eh Bendt?)

    • Lindows just filed the SEC paperwork to raise $50M by taking the company public. They plan to use this money to improve their product offering and market it. The company has many obstacles to overcome in fighting an unregulated monopoly, but they have the right leadership and soon the right money. This is a bet we all need to make because if Linspire doesn't make it happen, nothing will.

      The Lindows clones of iTunes and iPhoto are spectacular! That is professional quality software that works out of the box, AND in some ways is better than Apple's versions. They are open sourcing these two programs, so if you want to help get a copy and start work on improving the underlying apps.

    • Most of the talks fell into one of two categories
      1. content-free but entertaining (Doc Searles), or
      2. sales pitches for my product (most disappointingly, Ian Murdock's talk was one of these).

      Better selection of speakers would be an improvement for next year. The best speakers were the industry commentators who didn't really have an axe to grind, such as all the journalists (Amy Wohl, Dee Anne Le Blanc, Brenno de Winter, etc).

    • There are a lot more points, but that's enough goodness for now. There are a lot of ways the conference could be improved, and I'll be suggesting those to the right folks at Lindows in due course.

    Don't forget to contact me if you have any suggestions on a Windows-to-Linux book.
    Peter van der Linden

  93. My own take on the summit by jeber · · Score: 1

    The 2nd annual Desktop Linux Summit was held at the Del Mar Fairgrounds north of San Diego on April 22nd and 23rd. The event was sponsored by Linspire (formerly Lindows) and featured 17 panels on such topics as "International Expansion of Desktop Linux", "Desktop Linux at Play" and "Multimedia on Desktop Linux". Are you sensing the trend here? Every hour of both days one could hear references to "desktop Linux", and yet, for most of the summit, there never was a concise and consistent definition given to that phrase. Were we concerning ourselves with Linux on desktop computers, as opposed to laptops and handhelds? That wouldn't seem to be the case, as there was a panel entitled "Get Up and Go". According to the event program, this panel would address the fact that "Linux is no longer limited to desktop computers:how mobile will it get?" We never did discover exactly how mobile Linux could get, unfortunately. Due to the unexplained absence of Chris Pirillo of Lockergnome fame (whose name was misspelled in the program as "Prillo"; could that be why he decided not to appear?) this panel was reduced to a discussion of Linux pre-installed laptops being sold on college campuses by Morgan Lim. Were we there to discuss Linux on the home desktop. Not exclusively, as there were several discussions of Linux in the corporate environment. Brenno de Winter (Microcost) moderated the International Expansion panel mentioned before. Panel members spoke about their efforts to convince corporate IT managers to migrate their systems to a consolidated Linux platform. Mike Ferris (Red Hat) expounded on how an integrated, managed desktop Linux environment, like the one provided by Red Hat, will result in better productivity in the workplace. It was revealed that in May, a major unnamed British bank will announce their migration to the Red Hat desktop environment. Perhaps the use of the term "desktop Linux" was meant to refer to the graphic user interface, slightly different in each version of Linux, and in the opinion of many, not truly user friendly in any of them. If so, coverage of the topic was practically non-existent. The keynote address was to be presented by Jef Raskin, best known as the creator of the Macintosh. Mr. Raskin's presentation was titled, "The Humane Environment", a discussion of the user interface and it's affect on the overall user experience. However, due to a family emergency, Mr. Raskin was unable to attend. He did provide print-outs of his speech. I would have enjoyed hearing his impromptu remarks on this topic, and no doubt the question/answer period would have been lively. As it was, I had some insightful lunch-time reading, but felt robbed of the opportunity to explore this issue further. On reflection, perhaps the use of "desktop Linux" was to set a goal; the need to increase the number of Linux distributions on desktops, any and all desktops, from the home to the office. If this is indeed the goal of those who attended the summit, it would seem we still have many hurdles to overcome. Perhaps the best summery of those hurdles was presented by Doc Searls (http://www.searls.com/) in a follow-up to his presentation at last year's Desktop Summit, "Crossing the Chasm". This year's presentation, entitled "Inside the Tornado", focused on what Mr. Searls sees as the solution to the many difficulties ahead in the effort to bring Linux to desktops everywhere, the lack of overall ease of use. His analogy was the car rental business. No matter which car you have in mind as you approach the rental counter, you will end up renting a Chevy Cavalier. When Mr. Searls asked for a show of hands to indicate how many owners of a Chevy Cavalier were present, no one raised their hand. He then opined that no one actually owned a Cavalier because it's a boringly basic car; no frills, no fancy controls, just a really fundamental car that anyone can get into and drive. This, he said, is how Linux distributions need to present themselves to computer users for Linux to succeed in the desktop market. It needs to