Negative - you're simply inverting the questions. Rights may very well include restraints on the actions of others - they don't *require* that others act.
Restated: You may not drive your car in a manner that puts others in immediate danger. You may not use physical force to control the actions of others. You may not trespass on the property of others.
How was the information obtained? Did you give it to them without stipulation? Public. Did they uncover it by breaking the law, or publish it with the explicit, demonstrable intent of harming the individual? That's another story.
"Solr"? Sounds Web 2.0, I don't think I'd be interested. Web 2.0 shouldn't require a book to explain it - in fact, the summary of the book is a bit too long for a proper Web 2.0 application.
A right, by definition, does not require action on the part of another.
You have every right to remove what you've posted to your own servers - but once you post to someone else's server, you've relinquished control of that information, permanently.
I've long ago given up the concept of keeping my anonymous online. I know how to *go* anonymous, and protect myself where appropriate, but I do not do so in my day-to-day browser.
Being in Internet marketing, my name is my brand. It's just part of it.
No, he was right, but you're missing the part where he talks about making it safe to put in the microwave. Press Alt+F4 to show that part, then it will make sense.
The reactors won't impact the global economy appreciably - it's *highly* unlikely that anything is going to blow up, anyhow. It's sounding like they had a partial scram, with primary coolant system failure afterwards.
Nuclear power *is* safe. You're seeing a disaster the scale of which is nearly unimaginable, and appropriate action is being taken. You don't fix these things overnight.
As for an 8.9 - 8.9 would make it like the 7th most powerful earthquake recorded.
You also have to realize - meltdown is very very bad, but we're not talking Chernobyl here - a bit worse than Three Mile Island, but the reactors are properly designed and the worst of it should remain contained until other action can be taken.
Um.. enzymes are just proteins, they don't reproduce. There is no more danger of that occurring than there is of my spilling a vial of muriatic acid and it dissolving the whole Earth.
Slashdot Mirror
Agreed. I'm actually happy with Win7, which is a first for a Microsoft product since Win2000.
Negative - you're simply inverting the questions. Rights may very well include restraints on the actions of others - they don't *require* that others act.
Restated:
You may not drive your car in a manner that puts others in immediate danger.
You may not use physical force to control the actions of others.
You may not trespass on the property of others.
Even as a marketer, I agree. This is fraud, pure and simple.
It was questionable before there was a published spec, but no longer.
Excuse me. I meant "drop the e" as a surrogate from "remove the last vowel in the word, preceeding the letter r, which must end the word."
See also: Flickr
How was the information obtained? Did you give it to them without stipulation? Public. Did they uncover it by breaking the law, or publish it with the explicit, demonstrable intent of harming the individual? That's another story.
Well crap, that sounds useful. Why on Earth did they do the stupid trendy "drop the e" thing with the name?
I'm interested enough now that I'm going to go read about it - but I'm still not going to read the summary, out of spite.
Just because it's on the Internet doesn't make it special.
What if someone out there knows your home address, and published it in a newpaper. Could you sue them or the paper for publishing it?
Take the emotionally charged Internet topic out, and lay it simply -- should you be able to forcibly censor someone from stating a fact? I don't.
Your approval is enough for me. Consider me modded appropriately.
Hmm. Well, I'm still around, after partaken in several of them.
"Solr"? Sounds Web 2.0, I don't think I'd be interested. Web 2.0 shouldn't require a book to explain it - in fact, the summary of the book is a bit too long for a proper Web 2.0 application.
A right, by definition, does not require action on the part of another.
You have every right to remove what you've posted to your own servers - but once you post to someone else's server, you've relinquished control of that information, permanently.
As a geek who gets a call every time a family member's PC so much as has a popup - YES!. Locked consoles for everyone, please.
Why would you fear pride?
Nice. I was thinking "My God... It's full of cores!"
I was attemping a gentle *whoosh*, but I see it didn't work.
The point of putting the iPad in the microwave was to "fix" it by destroying it. See? It's not nearly so funny when it's spelled out like that ;(
I've long ago given up the concept of keeping my anonymous online. I know how to *go* anonymous, and protect myself where appropriate, but I do not do so in my day-to-day browser.
Being in Internet marketing, my name is my brand. It's just part of it.
Agreed. I don't particularly like Facebook, but I use it with full knowledge that it is a public forum.
This isn't a Facebook issue - it's an issue of users not valuing the things that nerds - as a rule - value.
I never thought of it like that - maybe that's my wife's problem. What I see as 10.1 inches, she says is 3.5.
No, he was right, but you're missing the part where he talks about making it safe to put in the microwave. Press Alt+F4 to show that part, then it will make sense.
To be fair, the explosion was not directly caused by the meltdown, nor did it breach containment. That's not really what I meant.
The reactors won't impact the global economy appreciably - it's *highly* unlikely that anything is going to blow up, anyhow. It's sounding like they had a partial scram, with primary coolant system failure afterwards.
Nuclear power *is* safe. You're seeing a disaster the scale of which is nearly unimaginable, and appropriate action is being taken. You don't fix these things overnight.
The reactor came online in 1971.
As for an 8.9 - 8.9 would make it like the 7th most powerful earthquake recorded.
You also have to realize - meltdown is very very bad, but we're not talking Chernobyl here - a bit worse than Three Mile Island, but the reactors are properly designed and the worst of it should remain contained until other action can be taken.
I'm quite familiar with CJD, and its relative in the US whitetail deer population.
Prions don't reproduce either - they just don't go away. Like enzymes :)
Um.. enzymes are just proteins, they don't reproduce. There is no more danger of that occurring than there is of my spilling a vial of muriatic acid and it dissolving the whole Earth.
It's called "cloaking", and I've had sites de-indexed because of it.