This will provide some healthy competition to a market where there's usually only one or two companies providing internet and who own an officially sanctioned monopoly in the area.
I couldn't agree more. In fact, there's a petition to prevent people from sending one-click spam to other people. Click here to sign it. It will automatically detect who your representative is from your IP address and send him a letter.
Is workplace stress killing you? Have you been employed and now suffer from depression and dementia? Has someone you know been employed and then died? We can help! Call 1-800-SUE-THEM now! Once again, the number is 1-800-SUE-THEM.
They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists, and some, I assume, are good people.
An accurate representation of what he said was "some illegal immigrants are criminals", which is true simply by the law of averages, with the implication that if they went through a vetting procedure we could perhaps filter out the criminal portion.
Sorry, no. What he says reads as "The majority of them are rapists, drug dealers/users, and criminals, but (and I have no evidence so I have to assume) some of them are good people." The press summed it up rather accurately, even though they're journalists.
What Trump could have said about the problem, which would be more accurate but too boring for the sheeple, would be to note that illegal immigrants have a *much higher* proportion of criminals compared to the general population of either Mexico or USA. Of course, then people might wonder just how good an idea it is to prevent people from obtaining a legal source of income.
Sharing the pics with the rest of the world sounds like an excellent way to dissuade his suitors. Of course, if he did that odds are that the FBI would send him some (barely) underage pics to see if he'll share it.
Just out of interest, what is an example of a photo where you think this could possibly happen?
Baby pictures, especially involving a bathtub. Or, for people from other cultures where it is usual for women to go topless and pre-pubescent to go naked, especially if there's water involved. Or nudists.
Imagine you're an IT professional, and you report your client for having what turns out to be (after the court case) harmless pictures of his children, maybe get your ass fired. Or perhaps you don't report it because they seem like harmless pictures, then you end up spending half a year in jail with a nice, no-more-jobs-for-you criminal record.
But if you wanted some comparable situations, you could point at Law Enforcement using under-cover officers posing as prostitutes to catch 'Johns' for soliciting prostitutes.
This would be comparable if said under-cover officers were actually having sex with their targets. Which, incidentally they have done in the other direction -- with cops having sex with a prostitute to "verify that she really is a prostitute" and then arresting her.
Heh, I wonder if someone will gather all the government-distributed child porn and give people copies, with a nice "I got these from the government" notice? Because unlike with other illegal things the government might distribute in its quest to jail people, information can be copied indefinitely.
Easy solution, just bet at a 10:1 ratio against their 95% confidence interval. If someone really believes in their confidence interval, then they should expect to on average double their money from that bet despite the unfavorable ratio. Unless it's this kind of study
It is clear from your answers then, that you'd be OK with minors being able to send child pornography to your inbox, with no consequences to themselves? That minors could be paid by adults to produce child pornography, and only the adults (should they get caught) ought to be punished? After all, can't hold children responsible for making mistakes, right? The trouble, of course, with making something legal for some but not others, is that it makes for a nightmare for enforcement.
Slashdot Mirror
This will provide some healthy competition to a market where there's usually only one or two companies providing internet and who own an officially sanctioned monopoly in the area.
They want to revert to the previous board member.
Invest your energy in my energy bank, and I'll give you 1% return yearly. You get more Joules out than you put in!
I couldn't agree more. In fact, there's a petition to prevent people from sending one-click spam to other people. Click here to sign it. It will automatically detect who your representative is from your IP address and send him a letter.
Is workplace stress killing you? Have you been employed and now suffer from depression and dementia? Has someone you know been employed and then died? We can help! Call 1-800-SUE-THEM now! Once again, the number is 1-800-SUE-THEM.
People and companies will stand up to the government all the time, if there is profit in doing so.
It's only illegal if they choose to prosecute themselves.
I'd grant it "most important invention of October 31, 2008".
They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists, and some, I assume, are good people.
An accurate representation of what he said was "some illegal immigrants are criminals", which is true simply by the law of averages, with the implication that if they went through a vetting procedure we could perhaps filter out the criminal portion.
Sorry, no. What he says reads as "The majority of them are rapists, drug dealers/users, and criminals, but (and I have no evidence so I have to assume) some of them are good people." The press summed it up rather accurately, even though they're journalists.
What Trump could have said about the problem, which would be more accurate but too boring for the sheeple, would be to note that illegal immigrants have a *much higher* proportion of criminals compared to the general population of either Mexico or USA. Of course, then people might wonder just how good an idea it is to prevent people from obtaining a legal source of income.
Sharing the pics with the rest of the world sounds like an excellent way to dissuade his suitors. Of course, if he did that odds are that the FBI would send him some (barely) underage pics to see if he'll share it.
Just out of interest, what is an example of a photo where you think this could possibly happen?
Baby pictures, especially involving a bathtub. Or, for people from other cultures where it is usual for women to go topless and pre-pubescent to go naked, especially if there's water involved. Or nudists.
Security is hard and companies have to make their video surveillance products easy enough for a socker mom to install.
Or for someone who can't spell the most popular sport in the world.
BTW mdsolar, how are you getting along with your new friend mdnuclear? Or will you tell him to stick it where the sun don't shine?
10 GOTO 10
Imagine you're an IT professional, and you report your client for having what turns out to be (after the court case) harmless pictures of his children, maybe get your ass fired. Or perhaps you don't report it because they seem like harmless pictures, then you end up spending half a year in jail with a nice, no-more-jobs-for-you criminal record.
Hot Potato Exploit
Name me one potato exploit that isn't hot.
The couch potato achievement.
Ha ha, suck it mdsolar.
But if you wanted some comparable situations, you could point at Law Enforcement using under-cover officers posing as prostitutes to catch 'Johns' for soliciting prostitutes.
This would be comparable if said under-cover officers were actually having sex with their targets. Which, incidentally they have done in the other direction -- with cops having sex with a prostitute to "verify that she really is a prostitute" and then arresting her.
Heh, I wonder if someone will gather all the government-distributed child porn and give people copies, with a nice "I got these from the government" notice? Because unlike with other illegal things the government might distribute in its quest to jail people, information can be copied indefinitely.
No, the question is lalalalalalala I can't hear you / everything is fine / we don't need to spend money on anything.
Easy solution, just bet at a 10:1 ratio against their 95% confidence interval. If someone really believes in their confidence interval, then they should expect to on average double their money from that bet despite the unfavorable ratio. Unless it's this kind of study
Looks like Netflix is doomed to get paid by people who officially shouldn't be able to pay them.
Sure, there may be fewer heists, but boy are they whoppers! Something about derivatives and credit default swaps.
It is clear from your answers then, that you'd be OK with minors being able to send child pornography to your inbox, with no consequences to themselves? That minors could be paid by adults to produce child pornography, and only the adults (should they get caught) ought to be punished? After all, can't hold children responsible for making mistakes, right? The trouble, of course, with making something legal for some but not others, is that it makes for a nightmare for enforcement.
It's probably just the recently unemployed AIs from Ashley Madison applying for new positions.