Would you rather spend something that will have less value tomorrow or spend something that will have more value tomorrow? The choice is pretty clear.
Actually, I just don't spend my Bitcoins because I don't find them useful for buying things that are worthwhile to me or trust many of the Bitcoin merchants (just look how often an exchange of some sort is in the news!).
They didn't say they didn't want spiders. Nor did they say they didn't want to be on search engines, they said they wanted to be paid for having their content displayed (even if it is just a sniplet) on another site. Your proposal does not match the circumstances in the slightest.
Uhm, my CABLE PROVIDER has MULTIPLE PHYSICAL NETWORKS that serve its service area.
My answers to other posts have sufficiently answered this already on this topic. To give you a hint on what to look for: automated, peering agreements, IXPs.
You seem to have problems following threads, I will make it simple for you. This particular thread is about "You're confusing the Internet and ARPANET." in response to "The Internet was designed with a very specific failure mode in mind: big cities and their switching centers being obliterated, i.e. nuked, and the need to route around the damage."
Slashdot Mirror
Posting as AC makes you a fairly questionable source, as such, I don't feel the need to believe anything you say.
I also agree with the original poster, I would rather see targeted advertising over random advertising that has no relevance to my interest.
Yes, it just won't receive the benefits of an Apple Fusion drive, but it does run fine.
But this isn't strictly Google, Google doesn't have to agree, but perhaps Google's competition might.
You're confusing privacy with anonymity. They aren't the same thing.
I did?
Apparently one of their choices was lobbying to create a new choice, did you not even read the summary?
Did I say they should?
Actually, I just don't spend my Bitcoins because I don't find them useful for buying things that are worthwhile to me or trust many of the Bitcoin merchants (just look how often an exchange of some sort is in the news!).
The bank uses the money to make more money and then pays you some money back in the form of interest from the profits they created using your money.
Then I'd pull my money out and put it in a different bank.
If you read the article, you would see it didn't help much.
Is this like digital zoom verses analog zoom?
Fair use is a vague legal jungle and not every country even has fair use, nevermind different definitions.
They didn't say they didn't want spiders. Nor did they say they didn't want to be on search engines, they said they wanted to be paid for having their content displayed (even if it is just a sniplet) on another site. Your proposal does not match the circumstances in the slightest.
Tell me more.
Tell me more.
Tell me more.
Tell me more.
Your lack of reading comprehension reminds me of this other guy called APK.
I thought it was "You're holding the components wrong." while assembling?
What's wrong with weapons and oil refineries?
Which mobile phones are produced and assembled in the USA using automation?
My answers to other posts have sufficiently answered this already on this topic. To give you a hint on what to look for: automated, peering agreements, IXPs.
You seem to have problems following threads, I will make it simple for you. This particular thread is about "You're confusing the Internet and ARPANET." in response to "The Internet was designed with a very specific failure mode in mind: big cities and their switching centers being obliterated, i.e. nuked, and the need to route around the damage."
It doesn't exist anymore.
Not in the advent of a nuke taking out an IXP in usual circumstances.
Indeed, and if you followed the thread properly, you might just be able to understand the relevance of my post.