For starters, HAART, the first really effective long term treatment for HIV treatment relies on evolutionary thinking, as discussed in the first week of the introductory course on Evolutionary Biology that I took last fall.
The theory of evolution by natural selection is a unifying idea in modern biology and without it, it is impossible to do real biology, medicine or biomedical engineering.
Not plagiarism but still academic fraud. That being said, I'm fairly certain _nobody_ publishing "academic papers" would take seriously an article that cites Wikipedia.
Probably more people in this country[USA] have been killed by.22 rimfires than all other calibers combined, which, based on body count, would compel the use of.22's for self-defense.
While.22s may seem like 'wussie weapons', all guns are lethal. The number of people you kill is more a function of how many you shoot, not what you shoot them with.
Granted, if you were _expecting_ a fight you should probably bring along a carbine, after all:
As a corollary tactical principle, no law enforcement officer should ever plan to meet an expected attack armed only with a handgun.
You're talking about a planned economy not communism per se. Both Fascism and Communism have converged on planned economies in the implementations that we've seen despite being ideologically opposed.
The entire discussion is about tickets being available. With the current model, tickets simply aren't available or at least not in any reasonably easy fashion. That's why people turned to StubHub in the first place. At market pricing, tickets would be available for purchase. So maybe you have to put in a couple extra overtime hours to pay for the tickets, but that's better than wasting your time waiting in line for tickets.
Every other aspect of our lives works on the principal of: I give you money, you give me stuff. If it can work to make sure there's food on the table and a roof over your head, why can't it work for putting tickets in your pocket?
However, it's more efficient if they were to work a couple extra hours overtime and buy the tickets with cash instead of wasting their time standing out in the rain waiting for tickets that _might_ become available.
This may be cliche, but security through obscurity doesn't work. You can lock the 'net down as much as you want, but the people who break it will be more powerful than they are now. Not to mention, this is a very limited view of the world, while the US may or may not be on the verge of a police state, the rest of the world cannot be counted on to lock down. And seriously if the Canucks thirteen klicks north can access all the porn/source code he wants don't you think Joe American is going to want the same freedoms?
I don't see a lock down lasting long, I mean everyone likes their freedoms
Slashdot Mirror
A reasonable understanding of statistics takes all the fun out of gambling, unless you're hustling someone that is.
For starters, HAART, the first really effective long term treatment for HIV treatment relies on evolutionary thinking, as discussed in the first week of the introductory course on Evolutionary Biology that I took last fall.
The theory of evolution by natural selection is a unifying idea in modern biology and without it, it is impossible to do real biology, medicine or biomedical engineering.
Not plagiarism but still academic fraud. That being said, I'm fairly certain _nobody_ publishing "academic papers" would take seriously an article that cites Wikipedia.
Probably more people in this country[USA] have been killed by .22 rimfires than all other calibers combined, which, based on body count, would compel the use of .22's for self-defense.
http://www.firearmstactical.com/pdf/fbi-hwfe.pdf
While .22s may seem like 'wussie weapons', all guns are lethal. The number of people you kill is more a function of how many you shoot, not what you shoot them with.
Granted, if you were _expecting_ a fight you should probably bring along a carbine, after all:
As a corollary tactical principle, no law enforcement officer should ever plan to meet an expected attack armed only with a handgun.
Not rape, pimping.
Prostitution can exist without women being abducted and turned into heroine/crack slaves, but while prostitution is illegal that's unlikely.
You're talking about a planned economy not communism per se. Both Fascism and Communism have converged on planned economies in the implementations that we've seen despite being ideologically opposed.
The entire discussion is about tickets being available. With the current model, tickets simply aren't available or at least not in any reasonably easy fashion. That's why people turned to StubHub in the first place. At market pricing, tickets would be available for purchase. So maybe you have to put in a couple extra overtime hours to pay for the tickets, but that's better than wasting your time waiting in line for tickets. Every other aspect of our lives works on the principal of: I give you money, you give me stuff. If it can work to make sure there's food on the table and a roof over your head, why can't it work for putting tickets in your pocket?
However, it's more efficient if they were to work a couple extra hours overtime and buy the tickets with cash instead of wasting their time standing out in the rain waiting for tickets that _might_ become available.
This may be cliche, but security through obscurity doesn't work. You can lock the 'net down as much as you want, but the people who break it will be more powerful than they are now. Not to mention, this is a very limited view of the world, while the US may or may not be on the verge of a police state, the rest of the world cannot be counted on to lock down. And seriously if the Canucks thirteen klicks north can access all the porn/source code he wants don't you think Joe American is going to want the same freedoms?
I don't see a lock down lasting long, I mean everyone likes their freedoms