Aah yes, you are correct from a trust point of view. However, from a trust point of view, how can you really ever be truly sure of whom you are talking? Impersonation is always a problem, and then there's the issue of double agents and infiltrators. Then there's the whole sci-fi aspect like in the movie Face Off.
Actually, that's not correct. You do not need even one guaranteed interaction in order to establish an encrypted channel. Diffie-Hellman key exchange is pretty secure, as long as your encryption protocol is not broken. Whatever the circumstances, you need trusted endpoints, and you need a viable encryption protocol. You need those two. Not two out of a set of three, which include those. Untrusted endpoints means you're open to side channel attacks or simple bugging. Even if you have bulletproof protocols and 100% trusted interaction, it's no help if your endpoints have keyloggers sending their data to Eve.
This of those are "DRM and other features that were friendly to manufacturers" ? I scanned the list, and saw a few that might qualify, but I had to stretch. Your initial assertion that Vista was somehow Microsoft's foray into a walled garden and represented an exploratoy policy which was abandoned in Win7 but will come back in Win8 is nonsense and not supported by the evidence that you have provided.
Yea, 90% of the world uses Windows, therefore it is a de facto standard. So it's a good thing when MS puts pressure on OEMs to ensure that they do not ship PCs or laptops running non-standard, obscure operating systems which would only fragment the marketplace for applications and confuse users.
Retina displays aren't, weren't and probably never will be manufactured by Apple themselves. Multitouch predates the iPhone by decades. The idea of centralized software installation is not new. Debian springs to mind immeidately. Apple just was the first to charge for it.
Even the wheel isn't safe. I mean, when it comes down to it, the wheel is just a tablet with sufficiently rounded corners. Those patent infringing messopotamian motherfuckers!
You know, I always wondered if people with your opinions actually existed, or if they were just used as hypothetical examples of the most extreme form of patriotic idiocy imaginable. Turns out they do actually exist. Who'da thought?
Not for long I'll bet. The only thing we can be sure about is that the crown prosecutor will be a little more careful in selecting scapegoats from now on. The War on Terror is an ongoing exercise in balancing what the executive arm and its organs can get away with and maximising the state of fear created in the public mind.
It's OK. They'll declare war against botnets, and then implement a bunch of laws to combat them, all of which will result in a further slide into tyranny. Eventually we'll have government agents from the to-be established Department of Home Computer Security come into our homes once a week to inspect all of our computing devices. For our own protection, of course.
Ok, so then what are your actions? Youre saying that you can use your judgement to justify foreign aggression? If so, then you can't begrudge them the right to fight back. If not, then you're bound to admit the injustice of your own nation's policy. Your line of reasoning highlights the problem with public perceptions and why they can so easily be manipulated.
I don't see how simply being a theocracy automatically makes it "better", and death penalty for adultery and stoning may seem grotesque to a Western mind, but to a society that accepts and considers that to be just, well, that's their choice. Having spoken to Iranians, they don't have a problem with either punishment, as they consider those "crimes" to be undermining of the social fabric.
But wait, we have democracy I hear you say? If you call the circus that is the two party system "democracy", then I'm a flee on a baboon's arse. There's no meaningful difference between the parties, and on those occasions where they promise to fix the mistakes of the previous administration ("I'll close Guantanamo" said Barak), if the people actually give them the chance to carry out the promise, they simply renege when the time comes.
I think it's time the so-called "Free World" got off its moral high horse and recognised that it is no better than the barbaric hordes it's fighting against. Indeed, when viewed from the Other Side, we're the barbaric hordes.
Do you have any evidence to the contrary*? There's plenty of evidence supporting that proposition.
Just sayin'.
* Deliberately mistranslated speech outtakes and vague references to financial support to terrorist groups doesn't count as "evidence" unless you're a moron.
Slashdot Mirror
Aah yes, you are correct from a trust point of view. However, from a trust point of view, how can you really ever be truly sure of whom you are talking? Impersonation is always a problem, and then there's the issue of double agents and infiltrators. Then there's the whole sci-fi aspect like in the movie Face Off.
Actually, that's not correct. You do not need even one guaranteed interaction in order to establish an encrypted channel. Diffie-Hellman key exchange is pretty secure, as long as your encryption protocol is not broken.
Whatever the circumstances, you need trusted endpoints, and you need a viable encryption protocol. You need those two. Not two out of a set of three, which include those. Untrusted endpoints means you're open to side channel attacks or simple bugging. Even if you have bulletproof protocols and 100% trusted interaction, it's no help if your endpoints have keyloggers sending their data to Eve.
That would only be the case if they threw a MacBook through the window instead of a cinder block.
Why would I be upset at your wife?
This of those are "DRM and other features that were friendly to manufacturers" ?
I scanned the list, and saw a few that might qualify, but I had to stretch.
Your initial assertion that Vista was somehow Microsoft's foray into a walled garden and represented an exploratoy policy which was abandoned in Win7 but will come back in Win8 is nonsense and not supported by the evidence that you have provided.
Yea, 90% of the world uses Windows, therefore it is a de facto standard. So it's a good thing when MS puts pressure on OEMs to ensure that they do not ship PCs or laptops running non-standard, obscure operating systems which would only fragment the marketplace for applications and confuse users.
USB 2.0 allows for 400mbits data rate.
Please tell me what supplier Apple will be getting flash memory from that can be written to at even one fifth of this speed.
At the end it says "Produced by Bard Canning". Brad or Bard? I presume he's less likely to mistype his name than the Slashdot editors.
They have conclusively been quantified at 50.
Retina displays aren't, weren't and probably never will be manufactured by Apple themselves.
Multitouch predates the iPhone by decades.
The idea of centralized software installation is not new. Debian springs to mind immeidately. Apple just was the first to charge for it.
But please, do try again.
Even the wheel isn't safe. I mean, when it comes down to it, the wheel is just a tablet with sufficiently rounded corners. Those patent infringing messopotamian motherfuckers!
You know, I always wondered if people with your opinions actually existed, or if they were just used as hypothetical examples of the most extreme form of patriotic idiocy imaginable.
Turns out they do actually exist. Who'da thought?
Not for long I'll bet. The only thing we can be sure about is that the crown prosecutor will be a little more careful in selecting scapegoats from now on. The War on Terror is an ongoing exercise in balancing what the executive arm and its organs can get away with and maximising the state of fear created in the public mind.
Lisa, I would like to buy your rock...
Stop poo-pooing his efforts.
I don't have to see the colour of your skin to know that you're a total asshole.
If you are unable to see that aesthetics actually has functional value, then I'm surprised you're actually capable of the emotion of "sadness".
It's OK. They'll declare war against botnets, and then implement a bunch of laws to combat them, all of which will result in a further slide into tyranny. Eventually we'll have government agents from the to-be established Department of Home Computer Security come into our homes once a week to inspect all of our computing devices. For our own protection, of course.
Indeed, but his sample size of 1 is just as statistically insignificant as GGP's.
Not if they work hand-in-glove with legislation granting them immunity.
Ok, so then what are your actions? Youre saying that you can use your judgement to justify foreign aggression? If so, then you can't begrudge them the right to fight back. If not, then you're bound to admit the injustice of your own nation's policy.
Your line of reasoning highlights the problem with public perceptions and why they can so easily be manipulated.
Then you are bound to acknowledge that THEY claim the high ground by THEIR measures and THEIR society.
Given this difference, it remains to be asked who the agressor is in waging war to impose external standards upon whom.
I don't see how simply being a theocracy automatically makes it "better", and death penalty for adultery and stoning may seem grotesque to a Western mind, but to a society that accepts and considers that to be just, well, that's their choice. Having spoken to Iranians, they don't have a problem with either punishment, as they consider those "crimes" to be undermining of the social fabric.
Don't even attempt to claim the moral high ground when it comes to justice as delivered from the state. Modern legal systems are no better (arguably worse) than the systems that went before them. Theyshoot people with no cause, blatantly imprison people for no valid reason and deliberately frames its own people for military ends. Not to mention such famous institutions as Guantanamo and those black op torture programs carried out by the CIA.
But wait, we have democracy I hear you say? If you call the circus that is the two party system "democracy", then I'm a flee on a baboon's arse. There's no meaningful difference between the parties, and on those occasions where they promise to fix the mistakes of the previous administration ("I'll close Guantanamo" said Barak), if the people actually give them the chance to carry out the promise, they simply renege when the time comes.
I think it's time the so-called "Free World" got off its moral high horse and recognised that it is no better than the barbaric hordes it's fighting against. Indeed, when viewed from the Other Side, we're the barbaric hordes.
Do you have any evidence to the contrary*? There's plenty of evidence supporting that proposition.
Just sayin'.
* Deliberately mistranslated speech outtakes and vague references to financial support to terrorist groups doesn't count as "evidence" unless you're a moron.
Please stop calling out idiots on Slashdot. Slashdot wouldn't be Slashdot without them.