Again, since you seem to miss the point, you can't actually calculate that when there's an entire generation that could be eating irradiated seafood. In the future.
Iowa Republican congressman Steve King supported Akin during the controversy,[59] saying that Akin "is a strong Christian man, with a wonderful family".
Controversy over Akin's comments ignited again after the election, when fellow Republican Representative Phil Gingrey, who is also an obstetrician, said Akin's comments were "partly right" when he said women's bodies can avoid pregnancy in cases of rape.[65] Gingrey also said that he "delivered lots of babies" and "[knew] about these things".
Considering we don't yet know all the costs of clean up and impact for Chernobyl OR Fukushima, I'm not sure how you can state that nuclear is the cheapest.
Like how long until Japan can fish in the seas to the east of them?
"A man contacts The Lone Gunmen, believing his life has been stolen after being abducted by aliens. They end up getting caught in a love triangle involving a one-eyed stereo salesman, brainwashing, and a wrestling dwarf. "
And the very next sentence, which you failed to quote, shows how extraordinarily deluded you are.
Because of the almost perfect record of the Department of Justice in obtaining the surveillance warrants and other powers it requested from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, the review court had no occasion to meet until 2002.
The DOJ did everything perfectly in the FISA from 1978 until 2002. If you believe that there's an actual oversight court. Or are completely deluded.
Also note that NO ONE BUT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT CAN APPEAL A FISA RULING.
The United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review (FISCR) is a U.S. federal court whose sole purpose is to review denials of applications for electronic surveillance warrants (called FISA warrants) by the United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (or FISC). The FISCR was established by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (known as FISA for short) and consists of a panel of three judges. It is not an adversarial court; rather, the only party to the court is the federal government, although other parties may submit briefs as amici curiae if they are made aware of the proceedings.
And it shows the stupidity of ranking it this way.
China has ~1/3 the output per capita of the US. But 4x the capita. So it's actually putting out more. Even though it's not ranked in the top 50, per capita.
Slashdot Mirror
Again, since you seem to miss the point, you can't actually calculate that when there's an entire generation that could be eating irradiated seafood. In the future.
Iowa Republican congressman Steve King supported Akin during the controversy,[59] saying that Akin "is a strong Christian man, with a wonderful family".
Controversy over Akin's comments ignited again after the election, when fellow Republican Representative Phil Gingrey, who is also an obstetrician, said Akin's comments were "partly right" when he said women's bodies can avoid pregnancy in cases of rape.[65] Gingrey also said that he "delivered lots of babies" and "[knew] about these things".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_and_pregnancy_controversies_in_United_States_elections,_2012#Response
Definitely not.
I'm pretty sure he wasn't the only republican to agree with that philosophy.
So eating irradiated seafood, for possibly decades, is counted in that 'safest' statistic?
Noone in their right mind would claim that the future of technology looks like "iPads".
Except for all the technology companies.
And Star Trek.
Because radiation causes things to get brittle and break down quicker.
Considering we don't yet know all the costs of clean up and impact for Chernobyl OR Fukushima, I'm not sure how you can state that nuclear is the cheapest.
Like how long until Japan can fish in the seas to the east of them?
Or in your food.
http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2013/07/12-6
Only?
No.
Lots of people learn in different ways. Especially if that professionally trained teacher is still a bad teacher.
Because one or a few workers can't affect the company like one VP can?
Episode 6 sounds fun.
"A man contacts The Lone Gunmen, believing his life has been stolen after being abducted by aliens. They end up getting caught in a love triangle involving a one-eyed stereo salesman, brainwashing, and a wrestling dwarf. "
It would be hysterical to release a bunch of flies/mosquitos into a room of testers.
Windows opening & closing all over the place as they try to grab/swat them.
Companies that receive FISA warrants, like Yahoo, have challenged them in the FISA court.
How hard is it for you to understand that those companies cannot APPEAL the FISA court decisions?
Even though you said there was an appeals court.
It's only allowed to be used by the government, not the other parties in the case.
If they made a TV show about all that, and didn't put it on the History channel, it might get good ratings.
It would make an awesome TV show though.
Sounds about like the stupid criminals videos I watch before bedtime.
And the very next sentence, which you failed to quote, shows how extraordinarily deluded you are.
Because of the almost perfect record of the Department of Justice in obtaining the surveillance warrants and other powers it requested from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, the review court had no occasion to meet until 2002.
The DOJ did everything perfectly in the FISA from 1978 until 2002. If you believe that there's an actual oversight court. Or are completely deluded.
Also note that NO ONE BUT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT CAN APPEAL A FISA RULING.
Northern climes - thermo
Cloudy climes - hydro
Sunny climes - solar
Windy climes - wind
Combine as local weather patterns dictate.
160 w/sq meter is more than enough to meet the energy demands of my household, even on a .1 acre lot. Which is 400 sq meters. Which gets 64kw per hour.
Per the wikipedia page on solar energy, the earth receives enough energy every hour to meet the worlds needs for a year.
This is not an appeals court.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Foreign_Intelligence_Surveillance_Court_of_Review
The United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review (FISCR) is a U.S. federal court whose sole purpose is to review denials of applications for electronic surveillance warrants (called FISA warrants) by the United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (or FISC). The FISCR was established by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (known as FISA for short) and consists of a panel of three judges. It is not an adversarial court; rather, the only party to the court is the federal government, although other parties may submit briefs as amici curiae if they are made aware of the proceedings.
You are delusional.
And it shows the stupidity of ranking it this way.
China has ~1/3 the output per capita of the US. But 4x the capita. So it's actually putting out more. Even though it's not ranked in the top 50, per capita.
Admitting you have a problem is the first, and usually hardest, step.
And 'follow the money' leads you to the real reason she's doing this.
Consequences be damned. And they will be.
I'm not sure what's worse. That the Star Wars quote sounds 'right' for our current government, or that it's so perfectly right.
Clone, drone, whatever.