That's more likely to average people having the tools to see into the trading, not HFTs. I can (and have been able to since before HFTs) see the bid/ask price, my order and the transaction. All because of etrading tools, not HFTs.
If you can show that there's ACTUAL value to your statement that plastic picture frames are prior art to a DESIGN patent for the iPhone, I'll retract my statement calling you an idiot. But given that you made that statement, I'm pretty sure you have no idea what design or a design patent actually is.
Slashdot Mirror
Global warming!
Hope and Change ... in England?
How do I fix this rediculos mess with Romney?
I live in Lebanon, KS, you insensitive bastard!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geographic_center_of_the_contiguous_United_States
Solution?
Kill one trader for every $100M of losses.
Who do you think is going to review it?
Have you seen the SEC and their 'protection' of shareholders?
That's more likely to average people having the tools to see into the trading, not HFTs. I can (and have been able to since before HFTs) see the bid/ask price, my order and the transaction. All because of etrading tools, not HFTs.
I thought that was 1983?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WarGames
9 years ago?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northeast_blackout_of_2003
Actual relevant review.
Have someone from 1910 identify the different car manufacturer models from 1909. Even back then, they had actual design differences.
Nope. Neither can Samsung's lawyers.
Can you tell the difference between a Camaro and a Mustang?
That's a *design* difference.
Everything more than 20 years old?
Much easier:
http://www.pagereboot.com/?url=http://scripps.com/foundation/news/2011%20annual%20report.pdf&refresh=5
And Curiosity is running on a modified Mac - PowerPC G3/750
Think of it more as a verification of the systems.
A way to test the intelligence of the machine before applying it to current events.
That's a lot of future talk.
will be
going to
in a few years
will expose
The F700 was a feature phone that was a very slight upgrade from their last phone.
They could do that in 4 months.
Plus the F700 had lots of plastic on the front and a slide out keyboard. Not exactly a similar design to an iPhone.
If you prolong-ate the time interval, it takes more to arrive at the actual price the forces determine.
Why? It actually gives you more time to consider what a fair price is.
It's the total time required to come to a fair price that's the same. Not the number of time intervals.
I don't see how you could say from this that a plastic picture frame is prior art for an iPhone.
Thus, you're still an idiot.
How? There's no Start button. 20 years of memory mapping, down the toilet.
If you can show that there's ACTUAL value to your statement that plastic picture frames are prior art to a DESIGN patent for the iPhone, I'll retract my statement calling you an idiot. But given that you made that statement, I'm pretty sure you have no idea what design or a design patent actually is.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bias#In_judgment_and_decision_making
Seriously, you're wrong.
Shut the fuck up.
Are you seriously saying that wood frames are prior art to plastic frames which are prior art to the iPhone?
Because, if you are, you've drug me down to your level, you idiot.
They basically looked at a cheap plastic picture frame, and copied it.
And with this, your argument about design patents is over.
You didn't use the word bias, but you sure described it. "I am concerned with is the conduct of the judge Lucy Koh" is about as clear as it gets.