Did the facts support the ruling? Or are you just assuming BIAS!!
"All Things D got a copy of Koh's order, and we just gave it a quick read. Turns out that she granted the injunction due to the strength of the merits of Apple's case and the unlikelihood that Samsung would invalidate Apple's design patent -- the court already held that the 10.1 is "virtually indistinguishable" from the iPad's design and likely infringes Apple's IP. Furthermore, Judge Koh held that, because Apple and Samsung are direct competitors in the tablet space and "design mattered more to customers in making tablet purchases," Apple would be irreparably harmed by further 10.1 sales. Those two factors outweighed any hardship suffered by Samsung, and thus, the Galaxy Tab 10.1 was stricken from US shelves." - http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/26/judge-koh-stops-us-sales-of-galaxy-tab-10-1-puts-a-smack-down-o/
Any legal arguments you have against that? Note legal, not made up shit.
Your baseball analogy would work better if you used the MLB. People do get sent down to the minors for only hitting singles when they're expected to hit doubles.
So what?
Did the facts support the ruling? Or are you just assuming BIAS!!
"All Things D got a copy of Koh's order, and we just gave it a quick read. Turns out that she granted the injunction due to the strength of the merits of Apple's case and the unlikelihood that Samsung would invalidate Apple's design patent -- the court already held that the 10.1 is "virtually indistinguishable" from the iPad's design and likely infringes Apple's IP. Furthermore, Judge Koh held that, because Apple and Samsung are direct competitors in the tablet space and "design mattered more to customers in making tablet purchases," Apple would be irreparably harmed by further 10.1 sales. Those two factors outweighed any hardship suffered by Samsung, and thus, the Galaxy Tab 10.1 was stricken from US shelves."
- http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/26/judge-koh-stops-us-sales-of-galaxy-tab-10-1-puts-a-smack-down-o/
Any legal arguments you have against that? Note legal, not made up shit.
Wait, you mean a judge previously issued a legal ruling?
BIAS!!!
Concurrently?
http://www.apple.com/osx/whats-new/features.html#timemachine
Shooting safes???
It's not a technical problem.
Kim Kardashian (thanks to her huge twitter following) probably has more "votes" than all of Slahdot put together.
And she gets laid more often!
The names will change.
I doubt the security level will.
How secure is your md5 hash?
Ahh.
I read DC port as door card port.
Or a guest who wants to get back into their room...
Your baseball analogy would work better if you used the MLB. People do get sent down to the minors for only hitting singles when they're expected to hit doubles.
Since they're sueing on patents they made relative to the design, it's completely relevant.
Also, see other actual tablet design innovation previous to the iPhone/iPad before calling it bullshit.
Obvious is often only so in hindsight.
Hey, guess who else had a rectangle with rounded corner tablet in the early 00s?
Apple.
http://www.buzzfeed.com/mattbuchanan/the-original-ipad-was-gigantic
Or patented.
What standard has video out?
What standard has stereo out?
What standard has accessory control?
Well, only one group was able to acknowledge that change was happening...
What if it's missing a feature?
Um, because of the word monopoly?
Unless you're going for sarcastic, in which case I'll give myself a woosh, but I really doubt it.
Just brown rocks there...
Free!*
*$1200 monthly mortgage or rental agreement required
Welcome to 2005.
http://www.thenerds.net/ASUS.ASUS_R1F_A2_Tablet_PC.90NGAA1131A82EAL600T.html?affid=8&gclid=COmNn6D3nrECFUMCQAodnx1JXg
I noticed you left out Canada.
Is that a softball pitch for Godwining a thread?
There were no 'big guys' when US patent law was written.
a) says you. Show a legal standing that says that. I doubt you can find it.
b) the ban wasn't lifted, just temporarily removed until further legal wranglings.
http://www.androidauthority.com/galaxy-nexus-ban-temporary-lifted-100109/