Slashdot Mirror


User: NatasRevol

NatasRevol's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
6,627
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 6,627

  1. Hefner had consent.

    I'm pretty sure 13 yr olds can't give consent to a 59 yr old.

    http://www.snopes.com/2016/06/...

    I understood that both Mr. Trump and Mr. Epstein knew I was 13 years old.

    Defendant Trump had sexual contact with me at four different parties in the summer of 1994. On the fourth and fnial sexual encounter with Defendant Trump, Defendant Trump tied me to a bed, exposed himself to me, and then proceeded to forcibly rape me. During the course of this savage sexual attack, I loudly pleaded with Defendant Trump to stop but he did not. Defendant Trump responded to my pleas by violently striking me in the face with his open hand and screaming that he would do whatever he wanted. Immediately following this rape, Defendant Trump threatened me that, were I ever to reveal any of the details of Defendant Trump's sexual and physical abuse of me, my family and I wold be physically harmed if not killed.

  2. So sorry that a recorded threat against a presidential candidate is beneath you. I just can't believe I used the first link I saw, and that it offended you so deeply.

  3. And it was Dems that gave most of the money to repair it. $0 from Trump, even though he used it to rail against Hillary.

  4. Re: Interesting, Dave Chappelle. on More Performers Are Demanding Audiences Lock Up Their Phones (nytimes.com) · · Score: 1

    You do know most states have a 1 party law, right? ie only one party has to agree to the recording. The party doing the recording.

  5. Re:Interesting, Dave Chappelle. on More Performers Are Demanding Audiences Lock Up Their Phones (nytimes.com) · · Score: 1

    Well that's a nice big ole strawman you got there.

    I was saying the federal gov't has a class of people that can't be biased against.

    Bitch to them, not to me. I didn't make the fucking laws.

  6. Just FYI. The protestors are Native Americans. They're just enjoying a bit of payback.

    Pray they don't start handing out blankets.

  7. Yep. That's exactly what China says when they shut up reporters too.

  8. Re:Get it MFers? on Journalists Face Jail Time After Reporting on North Dakota Pipeline Protest (techcrunch.com) · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Or a Trump supporter making direct threats to take out Clinton?

    https://www.buzzfeed.com/tasne...

  9. Re:Interesting, Dave Chappelle. on More Performers Are Demanding Audiences Lock Up Their Phones (nytimes.com) · · Score: 2

    So, no point to be made. Good discussion.

  10. Re: Interesting, Dave Chappelle. on More Performers Are Demanding Audiences Lock Up Their Phones (nytimes.com) · · Score: 3, Informative

    Exactly why do you think a performer, in a private venue, has no expectation of privacy? That can be totally determined by the venue owner. Who may or may not have an agreement with the performer on what is or is not allowed.

  11. Re:Interesting, Dave Chappelle. on More Performers Are Demanding Audiences Lock Up Their Phones (nytimes.com) · · Score: 3, Informative

    Venue owners can ban anyone not in a federally protected class of people.

    So, smokers yes, races no.

  12. Re:Interesting, Dave Chappelle. on More Performers Are Demanding Audiences Lock Up Their Phones (nytimes.com) · · Score: 1

    Well, given that he clearly didn't make any point explaining how he thought private persons vs public government are different, he failed mightily.

  13. Re:Interesting, Dave Chappelle. on More Performers Are Demanding Audiences Lock Up Their Phones (nytimes.com) · · Score: 2

    Performer in a private venue is not public.

    I don't break the fucking law

    I bet you do every single day.

  14. Re:Interesting, Dave Chappelle. on More Performers Are Demanding Audiences Lock Up Their Phones (nytimes.com) · · Score: 0

    For supposedly being on a debate team, your refutation of his points is at Trumpian levels.

  15. Re:"IT" is on its way out on 2016 Has Been an Ugly Year For Tech Layoffs, and It's Going To Get Worse, Says Analyst (ieee.org) · · Score: 1, Informative

    "Trickle down economics" *is* economics. The effect of the economy being generated out of productivity of people who are capable of saving money in order to form new businesses, that's 'trickle down economics'. That's the only actual economics, there are no other economics at all.

    Dude, get off the drugs. Or on. I'm not sure which would actually help you.

    Though here's someone who's doesn't buy your bullshit trickledown theories. Because they see & live them first hand.
    http://www.businessinsider.com...
    Basically, *customers* create jobs. Not rich people.

  16. Well, my numbers were at scale (CA to MSFT) so definitely cheaper than any smaller (less than 10,000 employees!) customer.

  17. And they don't see to split their environments. .

    Heavy duty in house.
    Lightweight, scaling in the cloud.

    Because mgmt still doesn't get it. Even in tech companies. Especially in tech companies

  18. Two phones, with Chinese chargers, does not make for a 'history'.

  19. Re:Predictable when newer is not better on 2016 Has Been an Ugly Year For Tech Layoffs, and It's Going To Get Worse, Says Analyst (ieee.org) · · Score: 1

    I did most all of that first paragraph by myself. For a dev team of 200+ folks, that grew it's headcount at about 25%/year.

    If you're good at your job, you outsource others.

  20. Yep. Go research what your business will be charged. I worked at CA and argued strongly against cloud (AWS/Azure), partly for self interest reasons, partly because it was vastly more expensive. But was much more scalable. Getting charged roughly $50/month/VM is a massive waste of money when a $5k server can hold 100+ of them for a decade, or a cost of about $0.50/VM/month. Yeah, SAN & network costs are more, but you can see that it's not even in the same scale.

  21. Know of any remote jobs located there?

  22. Yes, every person in the car MUST stare out the front window at all times and never do anything but help the driver.

  23. The company did nothing because it made them money and thus became company policy.

  24. Re:Sad on Samsung Permanently Discontinues Galaxy Note 7 (twitter.com) · · Score: 1

    I'm not certain as I haven't seen Samsung, or anyone else, release any failure analysis. But then I haven't been looking that hard.

  25. Re:Dupe on Samsung Permanently Discontinues Galaxy Note 7 (twitter.com) · · Score: 2

    A simple google search would answer that for you.

    http://mashable.com/2016/10/11...

    "The news comes via Associated Press and the Wall Street Journal, and the difference between yesterday's news is in the wording. On Monday, Samsung said it would "temporarily adjust" the production of the Galaxy Note7. Now, the company's move is permanent. "