Slashdot Mirror


User: Sockatume

Sockatume's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
5,843
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 5,843

  1. Re:"Stole" or "confiscated"? on Homeland Security Stole Michael Arrington's Boat · · Score: 2

    The DHS had the authority to hold the boat the minute it arrived on US soil, for customs clearance. That's why Arrington had to sign the paperwork: to get it released.

  2. Re:Would you like some cheese with that? on Homeland Security Stole Michael Arrington's Boat · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And if the customs agent doesn't have the authority to amend the paperwork then and there, what happens?

  3. Re:Would you like some cheese with that? on Homeland Security Stole Michael Arrington's Boat · · Score: 1

    It sounds like the boat was already being held, and simply wasn't released.

  4. Re:This is stupid. on NASA's Basement Nuclear Reactor · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't they just ship nickel hydride in bulk?

    (It's just a shame this doesn't actually work.)

  5. Re:Smells like bullshit. on NASA's Basement Nuclear Reactor · · Score: 1

    Actually, if you read the source articles:

    The next consideration is "What is real? What is happening?" For NASA Langley, the epiphany moment on LENR was the publication of the Widom-Larsen Weak Interaction LENR Theory. It is currently under study and experimental verification (or not) at Langley.

  6. Re:Until it doesn't on Official: Playstation 4 Will Play Used Games · · Score: 1

    Yet their crap has never been foreshadowed by explicit comments to the contrary. If there's one thing that Sony is good at, it's ensuring that ideas that go against the customer's interest are a surprise to the customer.

  7. Re:He better be a billionaire... on Millionaire Plans Mission To Mars In 2018 · · Score: 2

    I have a hypothesis that NASA's at a disadvantage because the components of any manned mission have to be reusable parts of a larger-scale human space exploration strategy. They could go to the moon relatively easily back in the '60s because there was no "after Apollo". If the objective at the time had been to establish a permanent station orbiting Earth, then go to the moon, then establish a moon base etc. etc. then I dare say it would've taken longer to achieve any one step.

    Put another way, it's easier to climb a mountain than establish a home there.

    Fortunately it's not a race and I'd happily see NASA work on the longer-term stuff and let other people get the "firsts".

  8. Re:Online licences on Official: Playstation 4 Will Play Used Games · · Score: 1

    No doubt "online codes" will continue into the next gen. In hindisight it's obvious that Sony's patent was about removing the code-entry step in favour of just ticking a box.

  9. Re:Until it doesn't on Official: Playstation 4 Will Play Used Games · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Because it doesn't follow from "Sony did this bad thing once" that "the malevolent theory I have about Sony is true".

  10. Re:Did he say "play used games FOR FREE" ? on Official: Playstation 4 Will Play Used Games · · Score: 1

    The context is, "if you buy a physical copy of a game, you expect it to work in whatever console you put it into", to which their answer was in the affirmative.

  11. Re:Sony removes features on Official: Playstation 4 Will Play Used Games · · Score: 2

    How do you remove not blocking second hand games? How do you retroactively make a conventional Blu-Ray disk turn into one where resale is prohibited?

  12. Do they need to? on Official: Playstation 4 Will Play Used Games · · Score: 2

    It's clear that the PS4 is aimed at addressing many of the disadvantages of downloaded games (streaming full games to try them out, being able to play games before they finish downloading, etc.). If you can get people predominantly downloading games you obviate the second-hand games problem.

    (But not reselling digital games, although Valve's legal team are hard at work to hobble that.)

  13. Re:Cold fusion again? on NASA's Basement Nuclear Reactor · · Score: 1

    It's a reaction and a purported mechanism that have been floating around in cold fusion circles for quite a while. It shouldn't be surprising that scam artists, deluded tinkerers, or serious researchers have all considered it.

  14. Re:Tito presenting paper on *crewed* flight in Mar on Millionaire Plans Mission To Mars In 2018 · · Score: 1

    What happens when you decide to visit the Great Lakes? You break out the SCUBA gear?

  15. Re:Tito presenting paper on *crewed* flight in Mar on Millionaire Plans Mission To Mars In 2018 · · Score: 2

    If that's accurate then either he's putting it forward as an "earliest possible" estimate to build hype, or he sorely overestimates people's ability to put up with bare minimum living conditions.

    I do not think that the crew would be psychologically capable of performing mission-critical functions outside of the first month. Spam in a can.

  16. Re:Currently used tech? on NASA's Basement Nuclear Reactor · · Score: 1

    Batteries generate current, this reaction generates heat, so you couldn't use them directly. Although it would certainly be convenient to just charge up a bunch of old NiMH cells, then use them as "fuel rods".

    (If this were true. I'm sceptical.)

  17. Re:more ads on CAPTCHA Using Ad-Based Verification · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They also know that if you have to write down the name you're more likely to remember the brand. There's a lot of research right now in working around people's wonderful capacity to tune out commercials.

    (I think I saw a Microsoft patent for Kinect-based ads where you could skip the ad, but only by saying the product's name (or whatever).)

  18. Re:Smells like bullshit. on NASA's Basement Nuclear Reactor · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Yes, NASA Langley Research Centre, those famous cranks. While I really don't think it's true, it's certainly newsworthy that a NASA group of all people are proposing it.

  19. Re:Chart of the nuclides on NASA's Basement Nuclear Reactor · · Score: 1

    What a wonderful counterpoint to the article. If I had mod points I would give them to you.

  20. Re:why stealth on US Stealth Jet Has To Talk To Allied Planes Over Unsecured Radio · · Score: 1

    Yes, I'd be up for a No-Holds-Barred Man's Hubris Wrestling Championship. Especially the tag team rounds. Can a polar bear and a brown bear set aside their infamous salmon grudge to take down The Undertaker?!

  21. Re:You know, you can buy an unlocked phone on White House Petition To Make Unlocking Phones Legal Passes 100,000 Signatures · · Score: 1

    Or go to Europe, where phone unlocking is almost without exception available from your own network provider for a token fee.

  22. Re:What? Turn it off? It ain't got a switch! on Got a Cell Phone Booster? FCC Says You Have To Turn It Off · · Score: 4, Funny

    DO NOT eat the booster. The signal is too clear. So clear. Too clear. I lost mine in a bag of chips and I didn't realise I had swallowed it until I started communing with other people's body thetans.

  23. Re:Any optical drive at all? on Sony Announces the PS4 · · Score: 1

    Many people use the analogue leads to hook the console up to a stereo system or headphones that don't have an optical socket. I think Sony's been shipping HDMI cables in the box for a while now.

  24. Re:Will it run Linux? on Sony Announces the PS4 · · Score: 1

    Don't get your hopes up, while they're PC components it's a console architecture, and it'd take quite some wrangling to get PC applications (even games) running on it. PC games expect to have seperate graphics and main RAM for instance.

  25. Re:why stealth on US Stealth Jet Has To Talk To Allied Planes Over Unsecured Radio · · Score: 1

    For the same reason that the world MMA champion doesn't go around picking fights with enraged crocodiles: being the best of your species doesn't mean you're invincible. In this case, you want to avoid surface to air missiles.