I'm not entirely sure what your point is supposed to be. Are you under the impression that there is insufficient TV broadcast intensity for passive radar to work?
Expect something more like Magsafe. The "pebble" watch uses a magnetically-gripped contact charger because it lets them seal the case of the phone, making it water proof.
I don't think people object to the use of an appointed thirdparty to arbitrate a dispute and ensure fair and equitable trade and protection of rights. People object to the fact that Ron Paul's stance is against the existence of bodies intended to ensure fair trade.
Google was sued because Google are the ones who breached privacy in that instance, obviously. Do you really believe that it should only be possible to prosecute a crime if you can round up every single person who has committed a particular offense?
You're assuming that there's a surplus of minimum-wage employees and the businesses could fire a third of them to offset a 50% pay rise for the rest. In my experience minimum-wage jobs are usually of the sort where there you've got to do the work of two people in half the time, and if someone phones in sick the entire operation comes crashing down.
It was really, really handy back on the old 320x240 Nokias because in addition to bringing pages down to a size where the browser wouldn't choke, they reflowed the text into screen-width columns.
Ubiquity is not a good business goal in and of itself. If they wanted ubiquity over everything else they would pay people to use it, which is effectively what they'd have to do if RHEL users are a net loss.
Yes, I dare say it's simple mathematics. If the number of users of an OS, multiplied by the Chrome browser share of that OS, multiplied by the revenue per Chrome user on that OS, is less than the cost of continued support, then it's a simple decision to discontinue support.
Given that it's two specific service providers that are having issues, I wonder if there's a bug in the way their service configurations are handled in iOS 6.1.
You seem to be under the impression that it was people visiting sites from links on Facebook that had an issue. If you visited any of the sites, directly, while logged into Facebook you were affected.
If Facebook sold that information you'd have a point, but as it's not disclosed in any of their privacy literature that'd be a monstrous and legally actionable breach of their information protection obligations.
I'm not sure what it accomplishes though, aside from making it more expensive. The overwhelming majority of laptops sold now - Chromebook's target audience - are not high-resolution, and I doubt that high resolution alone would attract people who currently dislike it.
The article doesn't make a particularly good case for why ChromeOS would suddenly become attractive on a high-resolution touchscreen. Especially given that it's built around Google's not-touch-optimised web apps.
Actually yes, it is. There's a small but brazen minority of researchers who quite literally knock off other people's papers, often including some trivial modifications. You only hear of a few cases, of course, and I don't think that an open access licence is going to really make it any more or less of an issue.
Slashdot Mirror
I'm not entirely sure what your point is supposed to be. Are you under the impression that there is insufficient TV broadcast intensity for passive radar to work?
Expect something more like Magsafe. The "pebble" watch uses a magnetically-gripped contact charger because it lets them seal the case of the phone, making it water proof.
I don't think people object to the use of an appointed thirdparty to arbitrate a dispute and ensure fair and equitable trade and protection of rights. People object to the fact that Ron Paul's stance is against the existence of bodies intended to ensure fair trade.
Google was sued because Google are the ones who breached privacy in that instance, obviously. Do you really believe that it should only be possible to prosecute a crime if you can round up every single person who has committed a particular offense?
Blocking thirdparty cookies is also worth a crack, although as Google demonstrated, that can be worked around.
He was that guy from V for Vendetta who tried to blow up the Death Star.
You're assuming that there's a surplus of minimum-wage employees and the businesses could fire a third of them to offset a 50% pay rise for the rest. In my experience minimum-wage jobs are usually of the sort where there you've got to do the work of two people in half the time, and if someone phones in sick the entire operation comes crashing down.
I'm quite impressed that it took this long for someone to bother commenting about it.
It was really, really handy back on the old 320x240 Nokias because in addition to bringing pages down to a size where the browser wouldn't choke, they reflowed the text into screen-width columns.
Ubiquity is not a good business goal in and of itself. If they wanted ubiquity over everything else they would pay people to use it, which is effectively what they'd have to do if RHEL users are a net loss.
The open source community builds a tool that's so good everone adopts it? Unacceptable!
Yes, I dare say it's simple mathematics. If the number of users of an OS, multiplied by the Chrome browser share of that OS, multiplied by the revenue per Chrome user on that OS, is less than the cost of continued support, then it's a simple decision to discontinue support.
Alas, yes.
True, but Germany's still 40% of the entire PV market. I can't see them switching over to a net importer for quite some time.
Given that it's two specific service providers that are having issues, I wonder if there's a bug in the way their service configurations are handled in iOS 6.1.
You seem to be under the impression that it was people visiting sites from links on Facebook that had an issue. If you visited any of the sites, directly, while logged into Facebook you were affected.
If Facebook sold that information you'd have a point, but as it's not disclosed in any of their privacy literature that'd be a monstrous and legally actionable breach of their information protection obligations.
Actually Germany is one of the largest players in PV, both research and manufacturing.
I'm not sure what it accomplishes though, aside from making it more expensive. The overwhelming majority of laptops sold now - Chromebook's target audience - are not high-resolution, and I doubt that high resolution alone would attract people who currently dislike it.
Yes, I have. I invite you to try to use those on a desktop computer.
The article doesn't make a particularly good case for why ChromeOS would suddenly become attractive on a high-resolution touchscreen. Especially given that it's built around Google's not-touch-optimised web apps.
Actually yes, it is. There's a small but brazen minority of researchers who quite literally knock off other people's papers, often including some trivial modifications. You only hear of a few cases, of course, and I don't think that an open access licence is going to really make it any more or less of an issue.
http://chemjobber.blogspot.co.uk/2013/01/my-contribution-to-pierre-yan-debacle.html
Yes, that's my impression too, although I wonder how many people subject to such clauses really know where the lines are.
So you're arguing that you're almost certainly a sheep?
So you're arguing that you are almost certainly a sheep?