The idea is to be able to start creating with what you already own.
Unless it involves a camera or a microphone, in which case every gosh-garned product that could include one needs to include one, otherwise you're fucked.
For one thing, how can people necessarily know one or two years in advance that they want to start creating?
How are Amazon meant to? I might decide to take up writing in two years, I don't see a citation management application built into any of the current tablets.
It has 8GB of onboard storage and if it's anything like the original Kindles it'll show up as a USB mass storage device and accept the specific range of document files it's designed to display.
If your choice of tablet computer is a barrier to creating content - photos and videos, no less - I humbly suggest that you were probably not going to create anything on it in the first place. People who want to make things go out and make them, they don't make creativity-themed rationalisations about their gadget purchases.
IR touch input on the touch Kindle. So really you shouldn't have to touch the screen at all. FWIW the matte display on the original Kindle isn't exactly a fingerprint magnet anyway, and it's all tap-based rather than smear-inducing swipes.
The ads are culled from Amazon's local ads system.
People stereotypically read books on holiday. Amazon's target market is people who read books. Do the maths.
Amazon knows that $300 is too much. The existing Kindle won't go away. Maybe it'll be redesigned, it'll almost certainly get cheaper, but a massmarket-priced gateway to Amazon's store that's proven to sell out as quickly as it can be put in the shelves is a project they won't kill.
I suppose that in principle, if you can synthesise an image from a set of neural patterns you can do the reverse. Give the computer your video, and it'll give you the neural activity associated with that video. Just get your brain wired up at a sufficiently fine resolution and let the computer stimulate your visual centres to create the appropriate visual pattern. (Of course this is probably so coarse-grained that you'd just wind up recreating the "sex" scene in Demolition Man.)
I was going to say there's no reason why they needed to use YouTube footage, and they could've used abstract shapes and patterns as the basis for reassembling the image. Then it occurred to me that given our visual system is an evolved artefact, you might actually be able to work more efficiently using naturalistic images.
Its output is generated by interpolating together YouTube clips. The computer has a model of how a video maps onto a pattern of fMRI activity. Given a pattern of fMRI activity, it can attempt to generate an interpolation of YouTube clips that closely recreates that pattern.
It doesn't just "try to find a sample" that closely matches the data. It interpolates several together. It's expanding in a basis of YouTube clips and their corresponding fMRI patterns.
I still rue the day they dropped proper MS-DOS from Windows. So much great software developed in that environment, you'd think they'd still be updating it today.
Given that reproducing the properties of the membrane is one of the biggest outstanding problems in the creation of artificial cells, it seems pretty obvious that this is a step forward.
Not really. More like, they're reusing designs for some Saturn V components (the J-2 engine for the 2nd and 3rd stages of that rocket) and designs for some Shuttle components (the orbiter's main engines) as analogous components in this vehicle. If it ain't broke, don't reinvent the wheel, we won't be fooled again etc.
While I don't contest that it's an issue, I don't think that going to x86 is a good solution. I think you'll lose too much in inefficiencies of the architecture to make it worthwhile. If Intel can fix that, then more power to them, but I'm not sure how they can without completely overhaulting x86.
My point is that there's more to creating a power-efficient mobile platform than picking a power-sipping CPU and running the same old crap on it. Even in its battery-huzzling adolescence, Android's Linux component was heavily rewritten to be suitable for mobile use.
Slashdot Mirror
Yeah, none of those come close to doing what I actually use citation management software for.
The idea is to be able to start creating with what you already own.
Unless it involves a camera or a microphone, in which case every gosh-garned product that could include one needs to include one, otherwise you're fucked.
For one thing, how can people necessarily know one or two years in advance that they want to start creating?
How are Amazon meant to? I might decide to take up writing in two years, I don't see a citation management application built into any of the current tablets.
No, they introduced it last year. However this is the first time that those prices have been used as the "base" price when announcing a model.
It has 8GB of onboard storage and if it's anything like the original Kindles it'll show up as a USB mass storage device and accept the specific range of document files it's designed to display.
Anything which does not support my ideals is opposed to it. Pluralism is weakness. Your ass will be laminated. Resistance is futile.
If your choice of tablet computer is a barrier to creating content - photos and videos, no less - I humbly suggest that you were probably not going to create anything on it in the first place. People who want to make things go out and make them, they don't make creativity-themed rationalisations about their gadget purchases.
You're asking whether you can plug a printer into a Kindle? Do you even know what a Kindle is?
IR touch input on the touch Kindle. So really you shouldn't have to touch the screen at all. FWIW the matte display on the original Kindle isn't exactly a fingerprint magnet anyway, and it's all tap-based rather than smear-inducing swipes.
The ads are culled from Amazon's local ads system.
People stereotypically read books on holiday. Amazon's target market is people who read books. Do the maths.
Good thing they discovered superluminal neutrinos last week because you'll need a time machine.
Amazon knows that $300 is too much. The existing Kindle won't go away. Maybe it'll be redesigned, it'll almost certainly get cheaper, but a massmarket-priced gateway to Amazon's store that's proven to sell out as quickly as it can be put in the shelves is a project they won't kill.
The summary strongly implies that they had to calibrate it for each of the three study participants.
I suppose that in principle, if you can synthesise an image from a set of neural patterns you can do the reverse. Give the computer your video, and it'll give you the neural activity associated with that video. Just get your brain wired up at a sufficiently fine resolution and let the computer stimulate your visual centres to create the appropriate visual pattern. (Of course this is probably so coarse-grained that you'd just wind up recreating the "sex" scene in Demolition Man.)
I was going to say there's no reason why they needed to use YouTube footage, and they could've used abstract shapes and patterns as the basis for reassembling the image. Then it occurred to me that given our visual system is an evolved artefact, you might actually be able to work more efficiently using naturalistic images.
Its output is generated by interpolating together YouTube clips. The computer has a model of how a video maps onto a pattern of fMRI activity. Given a pattern of fMRI activity, it can attempt to generate an interpolation of YouTube clips that closely recreates that pattern.
It doesn't just "try to find a sample" that closely matches the data. It interpolates several together. It's expanding in a basis of YouTube clips and their corresponding fMRI patterns.
Those people are all going to die of acute boneitis when they first clap eyes on Metro anyway.
I still rue the day they dropped proper MS-DOS from Windows. So much great software developed in that environment, you'd think they'd still be updating it today.
Aside from the whole part about needing evidence of actual criminal intent, yeah.
Given that reproducing the properties of the membrane is one of the biggest outstanding problems in the creation of artificial cells, it seems pretty obvious that this is a step forward.
Supersymmetry has never been considered a settled issue. It's a popular hypothesis, but it's far from confirmed.
I'd hoped it was implicit that they were updating the designs!
Not really. More like, they're reusing designs for some Saturn V components (the J-2 engine for the 2nd and 3rd stages of that rocket) and designs for some Shuttle components (the orbiter's main engines) as analogous components in this vehicle. If it ain't broke, don't reinvent the wheel, we won't be fooled again etc.
While I don't contest that it's an issue, I don't think that going to x86 is a good solution. I think you'll lose too much in inefficiencies of the architecture to make it worthwhile. If Intel can fix that, then more power to them, but I'm not sure how they can without completely overhaulting x86.
My point is that there's more to creating a power-efficient mobile platform than picking a power-sipping CPU and running the same old crap on it. Even in its battery-huzzling adolescence, Android's Linux component was heavily rewritten to be suitable for mobile use.