Slashdot Mirror


User: Oneamp

Oneamp's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
7
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 7

  1. BBC rocks, hard. on Dead Pigs Used To Investigate Ocean's "Dead Zones" · · Score: 1

    Pardon the off topic post, but when I followed the link to the BBC's website and watched the video of the pigs being used for....er....science, I noticed this: http://imgur.com/bdeKx Rock on BBC!

  2. I'd suggest AutoIT3 for this kind of thing on MIT Offers Picture-Centric Programming To the Masses With Sikuli · · Score: 1

    It's an interesting idea, but if you're serious about automating Windows, I heartily recommend AutoIT3. http://www.autoitscript.com/autoit3/

  3. Re:To Everyone... on Man "Beats" World of Warcraft · · Score: 1

    This is precisely why I stopped playing WOW. At the end of the day, all you've done is move some bits around on a server somewhere. If you're building a ship in a bottle, at least you have a ship in a bottle. I do miss the people I used to play with, (we had a lot of fun together) but you can never, "beat," or "win," WOW. WOW is like the proverbial carrot on a stick, you can get the best armor/weapons there are, but periodically Blizzard just moves the carrot a bit further away.

  4. Re:Whats the difference between this and on Major PC Makers Adopt Trusted Computing Schema · · Score: 1

    I think you're absolutely right. Cory Doctorow (of EFF fame) gave a great talk at microsoft about why this kind of hardware dongle CAN'T work. It's the best explanation I've heard yet. To paraphrase, (poorly) your client and your attacker are the same person. The client needs the key to view the information. Therefore, the client has the key (even if try to hide it in hardware) needed to break your encryption. CSS is a perfect example of this. Here's a link to Cory's talk. Excellent reading. http://www.craphound.com/msftdrm.txt

  5. No need to worry on Major PC Makers Adopt Trusted Computing Schema · · Score: 1

    Like everything else, some kid will crack this scheme in no time. It will only be effective against those without the savvy to get around it. For the rest of us, it'll just be another Microsoft annoyance.

  6. Re:Linux and OS X killed SGI on Reliving The Glory Days of SGI · · Score: 1

    Actually, Microsoft had a hand in it too. In the mid '90's Microsoft bought a little company/software package called Softimage. At the time, Softimage was arguably the most popular software package available (exclusively) on the SGI platform.

    They (MS) spend a year or something porting Softimage to the PC. When Softimage became available on the PC at a lower price point on much cheaper hardware (Intel Xeon mostly), folks started dropping SGI in droves.

    Once Microsoft was satisfied that SGI was doomed, they promptly sold Softimage.

    Thanks Bill.

  7. SGI is the new Amiga on Reliving The Glory Days of SGI · · Score: 1

    I'm a long-time 3D animator. In college I learned about 3D animation on Commodore Amiga's. I started my professional career working on a $100k SGI 4D70G. As time went by, it became a $10k Indigo. Now, a $2k Windows machine many times more powerful than those old SGI's (or Amiga for that matter). It seems like there's always a few die hards out there who just won't move on when its time. I used to have an old CP/M machine too! I'm all for nostalgia, but I like my computers fast. I recently bought an old Indigo (ironically from my alma matter). I plan to rip out the guts and mod it with a modern motherboard, etc. How's that for nostalgia?