Slashdot Mirror


Man "Beats" World of Warcraft

Precision pointed out that a Taiwanese man has been named the first ever person to successfully beat World of Warcraft, getting all 986 achievements, completing 5906 quests and /hugging 11 players. Insert joke here. There are many.

655 comments

  1. Of course by snowwrestler · · Score: 5, Funny

    How can you kill that which has no life??

    --
    Build a man a fire, he's warm for one night. Set him on fire, and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    1. Re:Of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Well, if he's like every other person I know who has become particularly "accomplished" at games like this, you just wait until the pathetic lardball has a massive heart attack at the age of 34.

      I played WoW, and it's okay, but I can't keep interested anymore for more than a month at a time, and in more than three years I've only paid for a total of 14 months of playtime, about a month of which I didn't actually even play. It's a great time waster, but people like this either have some seriously bizarre priorities in life compared to everyone else, or have some sort of serious mental disorder and need urgent help.

    2. Re:Of course by NoYob · · Score: 1, Funny

      How can you kill that which has no life??

      I'm sure he has some sort of life - comes up every once in a while from the basement to see his parents, talks to friends on Facebook, and he maybe even posts here.

      --
      It's NOT me! It's the meds! I'm on 1000mg of Fukitol.
    3. Re:Of course by verbalcontract · · Score: 2, Funny

      Scroll over him with your mouse cursors and... right-click!

    4. Re:Of course by cashman73 · · Score: 4, Funny

      What's his Slashdot UID?

    5. Re:Of course by Dremth · · Score: 3, Funny

      This just might be the end of the world... of Warcraft.

    6. Re:Of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm not sure why your short attention span is any more admirable. I might agree that this particular persons priorities are difficult to understand, but no more than most MIT applicants, or football stars, or that girl who has given head to over a dozen different guys by the time she was 15. Reasonable people assume "all things in moderation" is the correct way to live life, however there's really no proof that this is correct.

    7. Re:Of course by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Funny

      The more appropriate question is "How do you win, but still lose?"

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    8. Re:Of course by Verdatum · · Score: 0, Redundant

      "Moooom!! Bafrooom!!"

    9. Re:Of course by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Maybe he should write a book. Here's the title: "How to win and still be a loser".

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    10. Re:Of course by war4peace · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't know, but he's not the first. The first ever to beat the game was Chuck Norris. Remember this, or else!

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    11. Re:Of course by MiniMike · · Score: 4, Informative

      You forgot the ".. for idiots".

    12. Re:Of course by morgauxo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hmm... Let me guess... 1

    13. Re:Of course by B1oodAnge1 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I moderate excessively too!

      --
      RUGBYRUGBYRUGBY
    14. Re:Of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Serious mental disorder? Steady on there pickle, we all have different interests in life and if he's proud of his achievement then I say good on him. Different horses for different courses.

    15. Re:Of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cast revive on him same as doom train.

    16. Re:Of course by anyGould · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Agreed - the difference seems to be "did you become rich and/or famous". No one mocks the hockey stars who spent every waking hour at the rink.

    17. Re:Of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's his Slashdot UID?

      ...and has he beaten Slashdot yet? (I still wanna know if there's an achievement for +5, Troll :)

    18. Re:Of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about... the Sword of a Thousand Truths?

    19. Re:Of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The more appropriate question is "How do you win, but still lose?"

      It's called a Pyrrhic victory.

    20. Re:Of course by Idiomatick · · Score: 1, Redundant

      1


    21. Re:Of course by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's because once you see the string tied to the carrot on one end and the stick on the other, the carrot just doesn't seem as tasty. Playing a game with no "real" end in sight just doesn't seem rewarding to me.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    22. Re:Of course by RichardJenkins · · Score: 1

      Sounds more like WoR beat him.

    23. Re:Of course by master_p · · Score: 4, Funny

      0.

    24. Re:Of course by Luyseyal · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I guess these "1" people are suggesting that this Taiwanese guy is secretly CmdrTaco engaging in some sort of highly obfuscated navel-gazing exercise.

      +1 Interesting

      -l

      --
      Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
    25. Re:Of course by Jake+Griffin · · Score: 2, Informative

      But there IS an end! All you have to do is get all 986 achievements and complete 5906 quests!!

      --
      SIG FAULT: Post index out of bounds.
    26. Re:Of course by QuantumLeaper · · Score: 2, Informative

      Until the next patch come out, all new achievements.

    27. Re:Of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You shoot it in the face

    28. Re:Of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or more appropriately I think: "How can you win, and still be a loser?"

    29. Re:Of course by cayenne8 · · Score: 1, Funny
      "...or that girl who has given head to over a dozen different guys by the time she was 15. "

      You talk about this like it is a bad thing...?!?!

      By the way, do you have this girls number? Is she legal age now?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    30. Re:Of course by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      Because World of Warcraft is really a platform for many sub games with a familiar game interface on how to get to all the different ones.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    31. Re:Of course by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      And unfortunately the "sub games" are variations of "deliver item X to so-and-so" or "kill X amount of monster Z". Yawn.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    32. Re:Of course by mweather · · Score: 3, Insightful

      All things in moderation, including moderation - Mark Twain

    33. Re:Of course by mweather · · Score: 1

      Playing a game with no "real" end in sight just doesn't seem rewarding to me.

      The reward is the fun you have playing. It's about the journey, not the destination.

    34. Re:Of course by cayenne8 · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      "...or that girl who has given head to over a dozen different guys by the time she was 15. "

      You talk about this like it is a bad thing...?!?!

      By the way, do you have this girls number? Is she legal age now?"

      Wow, tough crowd here today.

      :)

      Lots of chicks with moderator points today?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    35. Re:Of course by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      I think you have Chuck Norris confused with High Overlord Saurfang.

    36. Re:Of course by stonewallred · · Score: 1

      I excessively moderate.

    37. Re:Of course by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      I understand that, but when the journey is just repetition of the same exact thing over and over, after it's millionth time it loses some of it's original luster. I mean honestly - are there any MMORPG games out there that aren't basically copies of one another substituting the settings, weapons, and costumes? I have tried 3 or 4 over the years and don't see a bit of difference between any of them anymore.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    38. Re:Of course by 2names · · Score: 5, Funny

      No one mocks the hockey stars who spent every waking hour at the rink.

      Oh yes we do.

      --
      "I'm just here to regulate funkiness."
    39. Re:Of course by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      EVE is often cited as a good example of a "different breed of MMO". And in many ways it is- but the repetition rears it's ugly head very similar.

      With MMOs, I think you're either the kind of person who can enjoy playing with other people, and create drama out of the human dynamics, or you're not. The ones who are not should stick with non-MMO games- they'll always be better.

    40. Re:Of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His Slashdot UID is (-1).

    41. Re:Of course by JackCroww · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm moderately excessive.

      --
      "Ayn Rand is a bloody socialist compared to me." - Robert A. Heinlein
    42. Re:Of course by cheeks5965 · · Score: 1

      How can you kill that which has no life??

      was it this guy? http://www.geekologie.com/2009/11/come_on_admit_it_i_know_this_i.php

      --
      -- Flame me and I will happily flame you back. Bring it!
    43. Re:Of course by Loki_1929 · · Score: 1

      With Eve Online's new in-game browser upgrade, he could talk to friends on Facebook and post here without ever leaving the game.

      But you can't "win" Eve Online no matter how many quests/missions you complete, how many hours you play, or anything else. Best of all, a gang of noobs could walk right up and gank him at will anyway.

      --
      -- "Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
    44. Re:Of course by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

      He won a battle, but lost the war.

    45. Re:Of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is entirely possible that this "success" stems from an addiction, is a function of escapism, or is a result of some other disorder.

      But, yes, it's also possible he's just a pathetic loser who spends all his free time sitting in front of the computer clicking his mouse.

    46. Re:Of course by MBGMorden · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The trick is to use it as a social tool. I have a lot of friends in WoW. Lately I've taken a bit of a break (okay I haven't touched it in 4 months), but I still hangout on the guild's forums and facebook to keep in touch ATM. When I'm ready and work clams down again I'll be running instances and such with them again.

      Repetitive? Kinda. But honestly life is repetitive. Friday nights I typically go out to some bars with friends. We talk, maybe play some pool, and drink. Same thing almost every Friday. Saturdays we typically just hang out at someone's house. Talk, joke, drink. Sometimes watch a football game - as if that isn't repetitive. Line up in formation, throw or run ball until you run out of downs or score. Rinse and repeat for a few hours. This happens several times a week during the in-season and has done the same dance for decades now.

      Thing is, the people who enjoy these activities generally don't go cross-eyed looking for some deeper meaning becuase they're fine acccepting that there is none - and there doesn't need to be. Just hanging out with people can be fun in and of itself. Whether you're kicked back watching a game with your buds or kicked back killing kobolds, you can still have fun.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    47. Re:Of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You made me want clams for lunch today.

      mmmm

    48. Re:Of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chuck Norris is so good he beat the game even before it was made!

    49. Re:Of course by harmonise · · Score: 1

      ...in 24 hours.

      --
      Cory Doctorow talking about cloud computing makes as much sense as George W Bush talking about electrical engineering.
    50. Re:Of course by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      So did they declare that guy a winner and cancel his service? Somehow I doubt it. They just made the stick and string a little bit longer.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    51. Re:Of course by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      One could argue that this Taiwanese man is now "famous". Whether it's the good kind of fame, or the bad, is debatable... ;)

    52. Re:Of course by ImYourVirus · · Score: 1

      Sure that's impressive in and of itself but, you really want to impress me? Do it on all the realms. That's something worthy of note.

      --
      Why is common sense called that if it's not common?
    53. Re:Of course by srussia · · Score: 1

      No one mocks the hockey stars who spent every waking hour at the rink. Oh yes we do.

      "Dave Semenko, you're such a hoser, eh...."$%&/() NO CARRIER...

      --
      Set your phasers on "funky"!
    54. Re:Of course by sbeckstead · · Score: 1

      Tell me again how much you guys have paid out per month to play this time waster?

    55. Re:Of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      log(0)

    56. Re:Of course by Fustican · · Score: 1

      I don't know, but he's not the first. The first ever to beat the game was Chuck Norris. Remember this, or else!

      Chuck Norris won by default.

      The content of the game was adapted from Chuck's life experiences.

    57. Re:Of course by roblarky · · Score: 0, Redundant

      This. Exactly.

    58. Re:Of course by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 4, Interesting

      And unfortunately the "sub games" are variations of "deliver item X to so-and-so" or "kill X amount of monster Z". Yawn.

      It's the getting there that makes it fun, not the accomplishment. Last night we had a good run, and we're finally up to the last boss in Ulduar. It's not the highest and it's not the lowest, and the accomplishments were frosting on the cake. And nobody really cared all that much about the gear that dropped.

      What did happen was the execution of a carefully planned approach using a refined strategy with a group of ten friends you can depend on to carry out the tactics well. It involved discussion, a couple of wipes, refined approach, then finally success against Thorim. That was hugely fun.

      This is not simple carrot and stick. The win took a lot of thought, a lot of communication and some fairly fast and furious in-game action, a few close calls and some very close timing. If you see WoW as nothing but a level/achievement grind, then you're playing it wrong. It's all about the people you play with, not the counters, that make it fun. And an arbitrary challenge is still a challenge, isn't it? Otherwise you'd have to give up on all games and sports. What a dull life that would be.

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    59. Re:Of course by Fozzyuw · · Score: 1

      Ironic. I've always had a similar phrase that I've sort of lived by. "There's always an exception to the rule. Even this one." ~Me

      --
      "The past was erased, the erasure was forgotten, the lie became truth." ~1984 George Orwell
    60. Re:Of course by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      Okay, that does sound a little more fun. My question is - is this the other 10% exception to what I was talking about? Because I get the feeling to get to that part, you are doing the carrot and stick the other 90% of the time.

      I suppose I just had a different experience with the people I played with online. They were mostly immature little morons who actually took away from the gameplay instead of adding to it.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    61. Re:Of course by Garridan · · Score: 1

      Yeah. These guys have a good front-end to WOW that takes care of all the trudgery:

      http://progressquest.com/

    62. Re:Of course by Jim_Maryland · · Score: 2, Interesting

      is this the other 10% exception to what I was talking about? Because I get the feeling to get to that part, you are doing the carrot and stick the other 90% of the time.

      Depends how much you play and how you play. If you limit your playing to the leveling part of the game and don't play much at level 80 (or the new top level when the expansion comes out), then yes, 90% of your time could be chasing that carrot. If you make it to level 80 then spend most of your time in instances raiding with friends taking on challenges of the game (speed kills, attempting hard modes, etc...), then the 10% you refer to could become a larger portion of the time toward playing the game. Blizzard has done a bit to speed up the leveling process, but it does still take some amount of time. If you are a new player, it may seem to take forever, but once you get one character to 80, you generally know other people that can help you get there faster (power leveling through instances for example and help with harder quest). You'll also have special gear that you can send to your low level characters that will increase leveling so you aren't finding yourself killing the same X monsters to deliver to Y NPC for long.

    63. Re:Of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We just don't mock them to their faces for fear of being attacked (physically)!

    64. Re:Of course by blueskies · · Score: 1

      Did this guy become rich or famous?

    65. Re:Of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. I drew the line at 6 guys.

    66. Re:Of course by RobDude · · Score: 1

      That's true of any success.

      For most people who end up highly successful at *anything* they have to put forth an effort that would described by most as 'crazy'.

    67. Re:Of course by GasparGMSwordsman · · Score: 1

      I think -1 would be more appropriate...

    68. Re:Of course by jagermeister101 · · Score: 1

      Just remember: everything in moderation, specially moderation

    69. Re:Of course by squiggly12 · · Score: 1

      You know, I'm glad you still see WoW that way. I finally quit at the beginning of the summer because I was just waaaaaay to jaded.

    70. Re:Of course by BigSes · · Score: 1
      or that girl who has given head to over a dozen different guys by the time she was 15

      What do my ex-girlfriends have to do with this?

    71. Re:Of course by rcamans · · Score: 1

      Actually, hockey stars spend as much time as possible partying, picking up girls, carousing in bars, doing drugs, and drinking. I am certain of this, as I know one of the big hockey teams.
      So before becoming a big hockey star, if you spend a lot of time on the rink, you do get a pretty big payoff at success time.
      So let's see yu mock them now that you know the truth.

      --
      wake up and hold your nose
    72. Re:Of course by dgr73 · · Score: 1

      I'm excessively moderate

    73. Re:Of course by Anynomous+Coward · · Score: 1

      10 ways to ...

      --
      I'm not a coward by any name.
    74. Re:Of course by rolandog · · Score: 1

      Wow, tough crowd here today.

      :)

      Lots of chicks with moderator points today?

      Have you any idea of where you're posting? This is slashdot. There are no chicks.

    75. Re:Of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I'm expressively modulated. Uh, wait...

    76. Re:Of course by dan828 · · Score: 2, Funny

      In a row?

    77. Re:Of course by MarqueeMoon · · Score: 1

      Who in their right mind enjoys watching WOW more than hockey? Exactly. Even if you do enjoy watching WOW more than hockey, you certainly must play WOW. Hockey, as well as many other sports, have spectators who do not play the sport yet enjoy watching it. Out of all major professional sports, hockey players make the least and get the least recognition. Hockey players also endure brutal physical punishment. The worst injury a WOW player faces is maybe CTS. The comparison does not really hold.

    78. Re:Of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not without losing some teeth.

    79. Re:Of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, there were a few girls mixed in for variety.

    80. Re:Of course by Madsy · · Score: 1

      How can you kill that which has no wife??

      There, I fixed that for you.

    81. Re:Of course by CalSolt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      He did become famous. Just now. When was the last time something you did personally was reported on by the world media? I'm not saying that your criticism is misplaced, just that you're using the wrong argument. More significant than becoming rich or famous is whether you have done anything worthwhile and the answer in this case is no.

    82. Re:Of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BTW... Is the NHL strike over yet?

    83. Re:Of course by IAmRenegadeX · · Score: 1

      1 / 0

    84. Re:Of course by darthvader100 · · Score: 1

      The Dummies Guide To...

    85. Re:Of course by shiftless · · Score: 1

      No one mocks the hockey stars who spent every waking hour at the rink.

      That's because hockey stars aren't enormously fat, pale cheeto munchers who spend every waking hour in a basement illuminated by the glow of a CRT screen, or in the case of the guy who sleeps in the next bunk over from me, annoying kids who lay around hammering on their Nintendo DS buttons every waking hour while sucking loudly on a juice box. At least the hockey star is in fantastic physical condition and obviously has excellent coordination, balance, strength, etc. What positive traits does the WoW nerd acquire in his many wasted hours to make women want to fuck him or other guys want to be him?

    86. Re:Of course by Exitar · · Score: 1

      If you're a football star, chances are you're one of the dozen guys.
      If you're a known WoW player, I don't think that particular girl paid you a visit into your mom basement.

    87. Re:Of course by Exitar · · Score: 1

      Compared to "socially accepted" time wasters other people do, like watching TV?

    88. Re:Of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been explicitly manipulated... Wait. What?

    89. Re:Of course by peater · · Score: 1

      That's all very good and you are probably right, but to prioritize my priorities, would you be kind enough to share the msn id of this 15 year old?

      Sincerely,
      I-have-no-claim-to-fame-yet-but-this-15-year-old-will-get-me-there-ly you'rs

    90. Re:Of course by iamapizza · · Score: 1

      Were they playing WoW at the time?

      --
      Always proofread carefully to see if you any words out.
    91. Re:Of course by sbeckstead · · Score: 1

      Yeah but if you only use an antenna it's free.

    92. Re:Of course by JorgeFierro · · Score: 1

      ...with Java technologies.

    93. Re:Of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree his success could stem from a quality that would be associated with the term "addiction" but you are coming from the perspective that there is an optimal (for want of a better word) mental state that we should judge others in relation to. It then follows that anyone that falls short of this optimal state could be described as "deficient" or diagnosed with a "disorder". I believe that the human race is diverse for a reason and that we should not judge people with a subjective yardstick (a yardstick that is created by psychiatrists, government, press and the other infinite amount of factors that warp and shape our reality)

    94. Re:Of course by Dr.+Impossible · · Score: 0

      I'd like to know what the fuck this "life" is that everyone is always ranting about. Apparently spending your days sitting on the sofa and watching reality TV is a "life," but spending the same amount of time playing WoW is not. Being a completely useless, miserable fuckup is all fine and well as long as you're not playing WoW.

    95. Re:Of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's that girls number?

    96. Re:Of course by Dadamh · · Score: 1

      in a basement illuminated by the glow of a CRT screen

      What WoW player uses some junk old CRT to play?

    97. Re:Of course by namco · · Score: 1

      The win took a lot of thought, a lot of communication and some fairly fast and furious in-game action

      Llllleeeeeerrrrrooooooyyyyyy Jeeennkins
      At least I got chicken!

  2. Relevence by conureman · · Score: 5, Funny

    Something I can tell my kid that won't get a "meh". Cool.

    --
    The cost of that cleanup, of course, will be borne by taxpayers, not industry.
    1. Re:Relevence by ubrgeek · · Score: 5, Funny

      > Something I can tell my kid that won't get a "meh".

      Isn't that one of the achievements, too? ;)

      --
      Bark less. Wag more.
    2. Re:Relevence by TheCycoONE · · Score: 1

      Sometimes trolls get mod points

    3. Re:Relevence by Shakrai · · Score: 0

      Trolls often get mod points

      Fixed that for you :)

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    4. Re:Relevence by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      Sometimes mods get troll points.

    5. Re:Relevence by twiddlingbits · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You know that's not such a bad idea! You mod something troll, the meta-mods agree you get those mod points back next time, A careful moderator would never run out of points!

    6. Re:Relevence by conureman · · Score: 1

      I have a theory. When I posted, I had my sig quoting a funny line from one of TFAs that I'd read, which the mod probably hadn't, and it could be construed as disparaging WoW players. Unintended consequences. (Or it was just the typical humorless loser with mod point thing.) I could see redundant maybe, or off-topic if you really didn't get it... (I usually Google-check my sigs to be sure they get top-of-page, for when it *crickets*, or whooshes, as they so often do.) I get quite a few mod points, which I promote the kind of posts I aspire to, whether I agree or not. Troll is for egregiously foul language, ad-hominem attacks, or SPAM. I modded a really good Troll +1 funny a few days ago and when I looked again it was +5. We like our Trolls. I LMAO when I get modded troll though... losers.

      --
      The cost of that cleanup, of course, will be borne by taxpayers, not industry.
    7. Re:Relevence by OakDragon · · Score: 1

      Sometimes mods get troll points.

      Only in Soviet Russia.

    8. Re:Relevence by conureman · · Score: 1

      I actually called my kid while he was on the train to school. It was the best conversation we've had in weeks, he's been quite the surly teen lately. My post was serious. The sig is usually ironic or humorous... or obtuse, sorry about those.

      --
      The cost of that cleanup, of course, will be borne by taxpayers, not industry.
    9. Re:Relevence by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1

      Stay away from tha voodoo!

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    10. Re:Relevence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having a kid in the first place would be a monumental achievement for a WoW player.

  3. Gratz by sparhawktn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Wonder how many "people" this man really is

    1. Re:Gratz by davidbrit2 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Wonder how many "people" this man really is

      Zero. We've lost him.

    2. Re:Gratz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's worse, Jim. His BRAIN has been removed.

  4. Does he have all the best gearr by Psychotic_Wrath · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If he doesn't have all the best gear then I wouldn't say he has beaten it yet. But that is quite an achievement what he has done.

    --

    Doctors do Massage in Longview WA now, who knew?
    1. Re:Does he have all the best gearr by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Informative

      If he doesn't have all the best gear then I wouldn't say he has beaten it yet. But that is quite an achievement what he has done.

      Here's his gear and stats and achievements and PvP and all that. I wish I knew his /played though.

      --
      My work here is dung.
    2. Re:Does he have all the best gearr by Major+Blud · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, he better have the Sword of a 1000 Truths.

      --
      If you post as Anonymous Coward, don't expect a reply.
    3. Re:Does he have all the best gearr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pun intended?

    4. Re:Does he have all the best gearr by batquux · · Score: 5, Funny

      So he's only done this with one race/class combo. What a n00b!

    5. Re:Does he have all the best gearr by Shadyman · · Score: 5, Funny

      So, wait. He's got 165/164 achievements in PvP and 138/139 World Event achievements? Hmmm... He doesn't have "BB King" from Winter Veil. Pwned already by upcoming events!

    6. Re:Does he have all the best gearr by ilitirit · · Score: 1

      His player vs player stat says 165/164, and World Events says 138/139. I assume this is a bug/glitch? I don't know anything about WoW so forgive me if this is a silly question.

    7. Re:Does he have all the best gearr by hollywench · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the Armory link. I wonder if he did it "For the Horde!!" ?? :)

    8. Re:Does he have all the best gearr by biryokumaru · · Score: 1

      He doesn't have the BB King achievement in Winter Veil for World Events. He isn't done yet.

      --
      When you're afraid to download music illegally in your own home, then the terrorists have won!
    9. Re:Does he have all the best gearr by pthor1231 · · Score: 1

      At least for the World Events, this missing achievement was added at some point after the last go round of christmas, and it requires you to do a few things during christmas festival. I am sure he will get it done the day christmas festival starts. Not sure whats up with the one extra PVP achievement though.

    10. Re:Does he have all the best gearr by biryokumaru · · Score: 2, Insightful

      He has a deprecated achievement, and does not have an upcoming achievement. So those numbers are accurate.

      --
      When you're afraid to download music illegally in your own home, then the terrorists have won!
    11. Re:Does he have all the best gearr by Vanye1 · · Score: 1

      It's called Slayer of the Lifeless.
      http://www.wowhead.com/?item=39344

    12. Re:Does he have all the best gearr by richdun · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah try getting all that with a mage or (insert whiny "can haz buffz?" race / class combo here)!

      But seriously, check out his Feats of Strength. He may have "only" done this on one race / class combo, but he's pretty done everything a druid could / should do. Realm firsts on nearly every Wrath raid boss that gives a feat, high arena ranking last season (probably explains the tree off-spec), has Atiesh, and did holidays before holidays gave achievements. Impressive, if not insanely time consuming. (also - no "the Insane" feat? Psh...)

    13. Re:Does he have all the best gearr by X3J11 · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't do him any good, Druids cannot use swords. Or so I've heard.

    14. Re:Does he have all the best gearr by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      But that is quite an achievement what he has done.

      And yet, in the final analysis,in reality he has acheived nothing. Which is exactly the reason why I stopped playing WoW (well, that and it was only a trial account anyway). By the way, why is everyone assuming that this player is a "he"? Statistically this very likely is a guy living in his mom's basement, but let's not reinforce the stereotypes, ok?

      Gotta go... mom's calling me upstairs for dinner!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    15. Re:Does he have all the best gearr by selven · · Score: 1

      One race/class/talent combo, to be precise. How many different combinations of talents are there again?

    16. Re:Does he have all the best gearr by TheLink · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And in the final analysis what will most of us have achieved in our "real" lives?

      Nothing really much.

      --
    17. Re:Does he have all the best gearr by sabt-pestnu · · Score: 1

      Armory also has other issues with deprecated achievements...

      The summary shows 164 PvP achievements, but if you count all the achievements listed under 'PvP' and its sub-categories, you come up with only 132. Yay, Achievement Inflation!

    18. Re:Does he have all the best gearr by el3mentary · · Score: 1

      By the way, why is everyone assuming that this player is a "he"?

      Because of the title of the article?

      --
      I reject your reality and substitute my own.
    19. Re:Does he have all the best gearr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are also some 'Feat of Strengths' that he doesn't have (worth no points, either because they are time limited when you can get them, or they are a really huge grind). In particular the Insane feat requires getting the highest reputation with various factions that do not have any rewards attached to them and have very limited ways to gain reputation with them. Another is Hero of Shrattrath which requires (again) getting highest reputation with 2 factions that are opposed (not at the same time). The problem being that once you are hated by one, it requires a huge number of item turn-ins to get to the point where they will allow you to do the standard reputation turnins and quests. Finally, it seems he is holding off on the pirate faction due to the fact the only way to get the highest faction level is to turn in the one and only quest they give when you are 1 point shy from it. The only way to gain reputation for the last 21,000 points is to kill a certain NPC for 5 rep, who respawns once every 5 minutes.

    20. Re:Does he have all the best gearr by Mozai · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You can get a guess from his achievements. 5906 quests completed, at an average of 14.55 quests per day = 405.9 days played. Probably 405.9 days online with the game, since he's got achievements from events that were over a year ago.

    21. Re:Does he have all the best gearr by whoop · · Score: 1

      Maybe it was designed by the people who did recovery.gov.

      As an aside, how do you not notice the web site you're designing has 875 congressional districts when there are only 435?

    22. Re:Does he have all the best gearr by sofar · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think it's a fake, and I know of one achievement he doesn't have (perhaps wowarmory doesn't even know them):

      it takes at least 5 kills over Argent Confessor Paletress to get an achievement for killing at least 5 different nightmares. He's only killed this boss once according to his stats page.

      other achievements also show incomplete but granting him the achievement points (turkey rogue shooter one for instance).

      looks like a giant glitch on blizzards site, and so I'm not trusting his page (not that it isn't impressive, but he certainly hasn't *beat* wow just yet).

    23. Re:Does he have all the best gearr by WarlockD · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You DID look at his stats right? He respected his tree 223 times and obviously has duel spec.and every damn time he went into a raid he probability respected back. Humm.

      The "Feats of Strength" are much more telling. It looks like he made this character at 10-23-2008. He must of gotten a refer a friend because he jumped up to 80 within that month AND "technically" completed the game by the end of that year. He also must have mutipul accounts. See all the "collectors edition" pets? He wanted his main to have all those. The rest of this thing looks like he was just waiting for the world events to open and do some of the higher end raids. This guy was on the ball from day one. He was probably stuck at "Trial of the Champion" for a bit, but it looks like he got all his rep for EVERYTHING in the mean time. Once he got TotC, he hit the heroics in order.

      I bet his guild was all in it too. No way you can burn though all those raids without good planing. Hell, look at some of the other Feats of Strength. ALOT of relm firsts on that first month he started. Humm.. His guild decided to start at that new server and completely own it.

      Lets be frank though. I farm for achievements myself, but evey one of these things are easy to get. All of them just require patience and since most people need rep anyway, can be done with friends. This guy is not some anti-social nutjob who did this "on his own" A group of people decided to go in with him, support him to get this fair.

      Besides, it might not be the original questions intention, but your right. You haven't really "completed" the game untill you do this with each character/class combination on both sides:)

    24. Re:Does he have all the best gearr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I call bullshit. He didn't finish the world events.
      And yes...I play wow.../sigh

    25. Re:Does he have all the best gearr by batquux · · Score: 1

      Good point. Then you have to do them all over again for the other side of the Aldor / Scryer thing.

    26. Re:Does he have all the best gearr by selven · · Score: 1

      And the factions in Sholazar. Sure, you can switch between them, but not that easily if you want to go all the way to exalted. And Gelkis/Magram, while we're at it.

    27. Re:Does he have all the best gearr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, he better have the Sword of a 1000 Truths.

      Druids can't use swords...

    28. Re:Does he have all the best gearr by PotatoFarmer · · Score: 2, Informative

      The "Feats of Strength" are much more telling. It looks like he made this character at 10-23-2008. He must of gotten a refer a friend because he jumped up to 80 within that month AND "technically" completed the game by the end of that year

      The achievement system went live on 10/23/08, so anything he had accomplished prior to that date would have registered as completed then. Note the multiple world event achievements from 2007 in that list as well as Atiesh, which would have been impossible to complete in such a short time frame.

    29. Re:Does he have all the best gearr by WarlockD · · Score: 1

      Your right, my mistake. Some reason I thought the achievement system started back in 2007. It basically got me back into the game and I just can't live without it now;) Haha, look at his guild, either this is an alt or a friend of his.

      http://tw.wowarmory.com/character-achievements.xml?r=Wrathbringer&cn=Kuonet&gn=%E7%A5%9E%E6%A8%A3

      That guy is very close too, but looks like he missed the Mask's from Hallows Eve. Have to wait a year for that one or find someone to buy them off of. (Can't remember if they are nodrop) God, Needy looks like a monster to get though.

    30. Re:Does he have all the best gearr by snuf23 · · Score: 1

      "Lets be frank though. I farm for achievements myself, but evey one of these things are easy to get."

      I wouldn't consider the hardest raid achievements such as "Alone in the Darkness" or "Tribute to Dedicated Insanity" all that easy to get. You could argue that the hardest part of them is getting a group of people together capable of executing the raid strategy flawlessly but they are by no means easy.

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    31. Re:Does he have all the best gearr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      based on 5906 quests at an average of 14.55 a day /played should be 1,1120839806053758885279856894036 years

    32. Re:Does he have all the best gearr by Psykechan · · Score: 1

      Druids can't train swords. :P

  5. Damn by rmushkatblat · · Score: 1

    /.er?

    1. Re:Damn by ByOhTek · · Score: 2, Funny

      Probably? This post seems rather defensive of it, to me. I bet it's NoYob.

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
  6. Time? by jDeepbeep · · Score: 1

    How many hours did this take?

    --
    Reply to That ||
    1. Re:Time? by sabt-pestnu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "/played" time (that is, time spent actually logged in)? You would have to ask him; it's not a stat available to the general public, afaik.

      Sidereal time?

      1) While he has the "Swift Flight Form" Feat of Strength achievement, the datestamp on it is not that of when achievements were first noted. This feat was added April 14 2009, he got it April 23rd. This might not be an accurate measure, though, if the Taiwan servers were updated later than the US ones.

      2) He has the "Stone Guard" Feat of Strength achievement, indicating that he was involved in PvP at least as far back as 2006.

      Beyond that, hard to tell.

  7. He's missing BB King by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 0

    In just about any sport outside of bowling, referees are prone to make BS calls. Just because this guy got 100% of the achievements, he did it via a glitch in the program. Technically he may have beaten the game, but spiritually he fails.

    Socially too, I bet.

    1. Re:He's missing BB King by kjart · · Score: 1

      Technically he may have beaten the game, but spiritually he fails.

      He fails 'spiritually' by not having an achievement that's impossible to get at present? If speculation is right, he'll get that in a couple weeks anyway. Agreed on the social fail, though (and I even play wow).

    2. Re:He's missing BB King by pwfffff · · Score: 1

      By the time 'Winter Veil' arrives the new patch should be out. This patch includes the new Icecrown boss achievements, and Arthas won't even be unlocked for at least another month or two. So really it will be impossible for him to have all the achievements until he manages to get Arthas hard mode (which will hopefully happen months after NORMAL Arthas is released).

    3. Re:He's missing BB King by Jim_Maryland · · Score: 1

      Agreed on the social fail,

      Not necessarily. Doing most of the achievements would require coordination with others and therefore requires socialization with other people. I guess the one way to defeat that would be multi-boxing, but nothing indicates that so far. Maybe he/she played with friends to get this done. I have co-workers that play and my son plays (wife and daughter used to as well). Some people I know from online (guild members) go to the same high school so the game can be fairly social. It may not be what most people consider "normal", but what really makes one lifestyle better than another.

  8. Amanda Seyfried/Julianne Moore love scene? Check! by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    > Insert joke here.

    - Kills 386,240,502 hogs
    - /shout NE1 have gold 2 giv? in Stormreach 32,768 times
    - Turtled AV frozen middle area 217,000 times (!)

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  9. Ancient proverb by hexed_2050 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Man's level and experience in MMORPG is reversely proportional to level and experience in real life.

    --
    Valkyrie is about to die! Wizard needs food -- badly!
    1. Re:Ancient proverb by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

      Man's level and experience in MMORPG is reversely proportional to level and experience in real life.

      Kinda like slashdot mod points ;-)
           

    2. Re:Ancient proverb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's also inversely proportional to the size of his wang.

    3. Re:Ancient proverb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure you meant "inversely proportional"

    4. Re:Ancient proverb by thePsychologist · · Score: 3, Informative

      You mean "inversely".

      --
      "What lies behind us, and what lies before us are tiny matters compared to what lies within us." Ralph Waldo Emerson
    5. Re:Ancient proverb by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 3, Informative

      You mean "inversely".

      No. He means reversely. If he has 80 levels in Wow, it means he has -80 levels IRL, not 1/80.

    6. Re:Ancient proverb by dzfoo · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't that be 08 levels IRL?

                  -dZ.

      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
    7. Re:Ancient proverb by el3mentary · · Score: 1

      Close, its actually an inverse square law.

      --
      I reject your reality and substitute my own.
    8. Re:Ancient proverb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Achievement Points) = (Getting Laid)^(-1)

    9. Re:Ancient proverb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You meant to put your period "here."

    10. Re:Ancient proverb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man's level and experience in MMORPG is reversely proportional to level and experience in real life.

      I started playing MMORPGs when Everquest (the real one, the first) first came out. Talk about a bad launch...during the first couple of weeks, the login process consisted mainly of staring at some improbably buxom elf maiden's cleavage for hours on end. If you got on, the lag was so terrible that you couldn't move from the start point more than a few yards. You'd get dropped in a couple of minutes anyway. I started a human mage, and leveled him to about 35, when I started a DE Enchanter on a whim and noticed that DEs can see in the dark. Now, EQ was a notoriously hard game; for example, being a human was a handicap because at "night", you were effectively blind. I loved being able to see, so I stuck with the DE chanter (even though it was rated a "difficult" combination) and leveled him to the max level (several times as the level cap changed). I spent so much time playing Evercrack that I would fall asleep at work while talking to my boss. But that was OK, as it was probably his corpse that I'd spent all night trying to dredge up from the ocean where he'd got eaten by a shark so he could get his gear back.

      Well, after EQ made crowd control redundant with their "DPS is everything" design revisions, I tried Eve for a couple of years. Got so far into it that I actually bought a bunch of in-game money (Eve is a deeply corrupt game, and actually encourages this practice). When I finally tired of the gankfest, I switched to the only game going: WoW. Played it for a number of years. Maxed out my Warlock. Now I'm doing Aion. Cool game.

      The point isn't that I'm an über player, but that I spend a large proportion of the last 15 years playing games. (And of course I was playing single-player games also...did I mention my Zork addiction?) Does that mean I didn't "have a life"? I'll let you judge. Here is a list of my "real life" achievements:

      • Learned English when I suddenly got tossed into an American school at age 8 (native language was German). Lost all traces of my accent in less than a year. No longer got beaten up by American kids for being a Kraut. Yay. Probably my most useful achievement.
      • Got a Ph.D. in Philosophy (a few years later, natch).
      • Realized that the job market for philosophers was...ah...limited, and the pay negligible. Though I knew nothing about computers or programming, talked my way into a software job.
      • By adroit job-hopping, acquired valuable experience and increased my salary rapidly. Here is a list of my various jobs (just duration...I'm not going to mention names of employers), with the starting and ending salaries:
        1. Start: $17,000 End: $23,000 Duration: 11 months (this was 1982)
        2. Start: $28,000, End: $40,000 Duration: 4 years
        3. Start: $48,000 End $48,000 Duration: 3 months (annualized hourly contract pay, actually)
        4. Start: $48,000 End: $52,000 Duration: 4 years
        5. Start: $48,000 End: $102,000 Duration: 15 years (took this one because I recognized potential, and it involved a move to an area where cost of living was much lower)
        6. Start: $75,000 Current: $98,000 Duration so far: 6 years (got riffed from my previous job, along with whole local organization; took what I could get to survive.)

      That's my work achievements, in monetary terms. Other very significant achievements include:

      • Refused induction into the U.S. Army during the Vietnam war, therefore doing my part to end that conflict.
      • Raised three fine daughters, the last of which is now finishing college.
      • Put up with my incredibly infuriating wife for more years than I can possibly remember. (Did divorce the first one, for very good cause. Got custody of my daughter.)

      Is that a sufficient counter-example to refute the assertion, or do I have to make the list longer?

    11. Re:Ancient proverb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I think he was going for proper grammar. So no, he didn't mean to do that. Although, this is the Internet so I can see how you would get confused.

    12. Re:Ancient proverb by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Hmmmm, I don't know whether to take my score as a compliment or an insult.

    13. Re:Ancient proverb by SerpensV · · Score: 1

      You've got more exp on /. than hexed.

    14. Re:Ancient proverb by Labcoat+Samurai · · Score: 1

      So, conversely, in order to have positive life experience, you have to have negative levels in the game, which is not possible. No, he meant inversely.

    15. Re:Ancient proverb by Labcoat+Samurai · · Score: 1

      Ha! If so, I suppose you should keep your character at level 79

    16. Re:Ancient proverb by Lost+Race · · Score: 1

      It's nice to imagine that the universe is so well-balanced, but unfortunately it isn't. Half the time that guy who's kicking your ass in a video game also has a better life than you do.

    17. Re:Ancient proverb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Historians believe this proverb dates back to the days when people would construct glass houses, then proceed to throw stones at others' homes.

  10. question... by Theodore · · Score: 1

    Is the 987th achievement and 5907th quest the same?
    AKA shotgun mouthwash?

  11. To Everyone... by whisper_jeff · · Score: 4, Insightful

    To everyone who's about to make a "get a life" joke, may I remind you, you're about to post on a geek news website. While the level of dedications required to achieve this probably does mean this guy doesn't get out often, I'd wager that many of us here aren't all that different and could probably use lives of our own...

    1. Re:To Everyone... by houghi · · Score: 3, Funny

      Get a life.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    2. Re:To Everyone... by oldspewey · · Score: 1

      It's all a matter of degree. I know and have known people who smoke the occasional doobie or bowl, but balance that activity against all the other priorities of life. I have also known people who were chronic, habitual drug users, and basically flushed their lives down the toilet attempting to service their addiction.

      I have absolutely no idea how many hours it takes to "beat" WoW, but I have a hunch this guy is not somebody I would consider to be a resounding success in the real world.

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    3. Re:To Everyone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, a lot of people here need to get lives. I can hardly this see this as any sort of a achievement.

    4. Re:To Everyone... by Doctor_Joyboy · · Score: 1

      Get a life.

    5. Re:To Everyone... by hollywench · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      All the anonymous cowards definitely need to get a life.

    6. Re:To Everyone... by eln · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sure, you probably don't have a lot of social butterflies on this site, but I'd wager that very few of them are really the reclusive shut-in that you would have to be to accomplish such a feat. There are levels of obsession with anything, and this guy's case seems pretty extreme by any measure. I can't even imagine the amount of time this sort of thing would take, and how many other things he could have been doing.

      I don't want to sit around mocking this guy for this, but I do feel sorry for him. After all, after his own personal sense of accomplishment over this feat has faded, he's going to be left looking back at all the time he spent on it, and the fact that he ultimately has nothing of any value to show for it. That can be very depressing.

    7. Re:To Everyone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      get a life!

    8. Re:To Everyone... by Thoughts+from+Englan · · Score: 2, Funny

      I tried to get a life once but I just ended up with celular automata

      --
      That was supposed to be "Thoughts from England" ... Oh well.
    9. Re:To Everyone... by Pharmboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Karma whoring at it's finest. Some of us run departments, play on Facebook, have successful marriages, fish on the weekends, visit with family regularly, and still have the time to hit slashdot, simply because it saves us time by consolidating tech news.

      I know its fun for /.ers ourselves lonely losers, but in reality, most of the readers are likely quite successful in one way or another, or all the "your rights online" and quazi-political articles and such would be meaningless.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    10. Re:To Everyone... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      To everyone who's about to make a "get a life" joke, may I remind you, you're about to post on a geek news website. While the level of dedications required to achieve this probably does mean this guy doesn't get out often, I'd wager that many of us here aren't all that different and could probably use lives of our own...

      The devil is in the details. Living in the basement semi-perpetually, but productively working on, say, Linux kernel is one thing. Doing the same thing for the sake of "winning" WoW is another.

    11. Re:To Everyone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A life is very subjective. Some people think living is getting drunk with a different hooker every weekend. Some think it is settling down with someone you may or not be able to live with and having kids. I wouldn't like to do either, and I don't think many would think my lifestyle counts as 'having a life,' but the point it, different strokes for different folks.

    12. Re:To Everyone... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Hey, hey, the geek social ladder still puts "people who brag about their /. karma" above "people who brag about their WoW achivements". Just barely, but still!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    13. Re:To Everyone... by cpscotti · · Score: 1

      If YOU are not happy with YOUR social life, don't bring it on here and say that we are all like that. because we are NOT!

      Get a life!

    14. Re:To Everyone... by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Funny

      fish on the weekends

      Hah! There you slipped! You're talking about the fishing contests in WoW!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    15. Re:To Everyone... by lastchance_000 · · Score: 5, Funny
      This seems relevant...

      William Shatner: You know, before I answer any more questions there's something I wanted to say. Having received all your letters over the years, and I've spoken to many of you, and some of you have traveled... y'know... hundreds of miles to be here, I'd just like to say... GET A LIFE, will you people? I mean, for crying out loud, it's just a TV show! I mean, look at you, look at the way you're dressed! You've turned an enjoyable little job, that I did as a lark for a few years, into a COLOSSAL WASTE OF TIME!

      [ a crowd of shocked and dismayed Trekkies.... ]

      I mean, how old are you people? What have you done with yourselves?

      [ to "Ears" ] You, you must be almost 30... have you ever kissed a girl?

      [ "Ears" hangs his head ]

      I didn't think so! There's a whole world out there! When I was your age, I didn't watch television! I LIVED! So... move out of your parent's basements! And get your own apartments and GROW THE HELL UP! I mean, it's just a TV show dammit, IT'S JUST A TV SHOW!

    16. Re:To Everyone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But, that's the point. When a bunch of geeks say you need to get a life, you truly need to get a life.

    17. Re:To Everyone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I can't even imagine the amount of time this sort of thing would take, and how many other things he could have been doing.
      I don't want to sit around mocking this guy for this, but I do feel sorry for him. After all, after his own personal sense of accomplishment over this feat has faded, he's going to be left looking back at all the time he spent on it, and the fact that he ultimately has nothing of any value to show for it. That can be very depressing.

      The same can be said about every Olympic or World Champion in just about any sport. It might also be applied to people who spend every hour of every night for years building their own hot rod or ships in bottles or whatever.
      In fact it can be said about every living human being who choose to do something different from what you choose to do with your time. "They should get a life."
      Nobody else ever has anything to show for how they have spent their time that has any value to me. I was born, I know that I will die, what's inbetween is mine.

    18. Re:To Everyone... by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      The devil is in the details. Living in the basement semi-perpetually, but productively working on, say, Linux kernel is one thing. Doing the same thing for the sake of "winning" WoW is another.

      The difference is the Linux guy can look back at what he did and feel a bit more confident that what spent his time on had a slightly more positive impact on the world in general than the WoW guy. Really (and this is coming from a video game programmer), if all you ever really do is stare at a computer screen, regardless of what you're doing, it's still sort of a sad life. There's a big, interesting non-virtual world out there, and it seems a shame not to see as much of it as is feasible in the short amount of time we all have in this life.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    19. Re:To Everyone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, at least he won't have to look back on the time he spent being a self-important twat who gets off on acting like he's better than everyone else, hmm? "Oh, those poor people who don't share my interests. I pity them!"

    20. Re:To Everyone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get a life. Hey! Let me tell you, I run a successful multinational corporation and have huge real estate holdings... oh wait, that's on Second Life!

    21. Re:To Everyone... by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      You're right. I'll admit that I don't get out that often either. Of course, in my case it's because I have a wife and kids ("getting out" usually involves grocery shopping) not because I play a video game every possible second.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    22. Re:To Everyone... by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      +1 Funny. Star Trek is, of course, an historical document.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    23. Re:To Everyone... by Reapy · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and on all honesty, we probably waste as much time as this guy, except we spend it on multiple different video games, tv shows, movies, drinking, etc. So this guy has been hyper focused on thing, big whoop. I'd argue also with the amount of realm firsts this guy has, he probably spends LESS time then the average wow user does in a dungeon. Realm first guys power through and kill everything one shot spending a fraction of the time most 'normal' guilds do at it.

      Anyway, cool, I like seeing people do stuff to the extreme :)

    24. Re:To Everyone... by selven · · Score: 1

      00000
      00110
      01010
      01101
      00001

      00000
      00110
      01001
      01111
      00010

      00000
      00110
      01001
      01111
      00011

      There you go, need any more?

    25. Re:To Everyone... by Tei · · Score: 1

      Not everyone that read these YRO articles have a life. Maybe is people that want everyone to move to SSL and IPv6, and read all these news in a "see, I told you so"-way.

      --

      -Woof woof woof!

    26. Re:To Everyone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you even talking about? The next ever-elusive carrot is just around the corner...

      Blizzard isn't #1 in the MMO business for their lack of understanding this basic rule.

      It's not over until the fat man cuts off his internet access, damnit!

    27. Re:To Everyone... by Conchobair · · Score: 1

      As long as he is enjoying it, where is the harm?

      Why can't this be his life and why is it less valid than someone who spends all day and night watching and thinking about something else just as trivial such as Sports or being a vicarious scientist or politician?

      If he is happy, then I say: right on, good for you, good luck in 3.3.

    28. Re:To Everyone... by vorlich · · Score: 1

      And don't forget the kids, or all those Clash concerts. And the wine, mustn't forget the wine. Too busy with my fairly average slash dot real life involving not living in a basement or mmorping to really do a funny supportive message to this but you get my drift.

      --
      Posts, MyBio or Sig, may contain satire, sarcasm, bolded nouns be sardonic or even witty & be Church of SD
    29. Re:To Everyone... by pwfffff · · Score: 1

      Yeah, had he not played WoW he would have won the Olympics and the Superbowl, at the same time, whilst successfully campaigning for president of the world. Or, you know, maybe his 'real life' didn't give him all that many opportunities to succeed as easily as this. Let me know when an article about you hits the front page of news sites.

    30. Re:To Everyone... by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      I know and have known people who smoke the occasional doobie or bowl, but balance that activity against all the other priorities of life. I have also known people who were chronic, habitual drug users, and basically flushed their lives down the toilet attempting to service their addiction.

      With pot?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    31. Re:To Everyone... by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

      A classic.
      I remember the best man jokingly using just the 'basement' line at my uncle's wedding, I laughed then, and I eventually figured out that it had come from this speech

      --
      I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
    32. Re:To Everyone... by pwfffff · · Score: 1

      Heh, wait 'til eln figures out that everyone dies. Boy will that be a shocker... finding out that that ultimately you'll have nothing of value to show for, well, anything! That CAN be very depressing. Maybe after he finds out he can play some WoW to cheer him up.

      Tell me, what great monuments have YOU completed so far that will give you something to 'show for' your life? I take it you've never been to a bar to drink and talk with friends, since all you'd have to show for that is a hangover? Never masturbated either, I'd assume? What would you have to show for that? Is the value of something you do only shown in how you feel about it on your deathbed? In that case, why would you do anything ever? After all, you may regret it, or worse: it could become UNPOPULAR!

      And even if this guy IS a shut-in, he's done the 25-man hardmodes. That means he has at least 24 other people that he socializes with daily. I'm sure that's more than some people can claim on this site.

      The only reason this guy would ever feel bad about his accomplishments would be because people like YOU decide to shit on him for it. I'll ask you again: what do YOU have to show for your life? It better be fucking impressive.

    33. Re:To Everyone... by cbeley · · Score: 1

      fish on the weekends

      Hah! There you slipped! You're talking about the fishing contests in WoW!

      I think you slipped. I didn't even know there were fishing contests in WoW :S

    34. Re:To Everyone... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I don't mind admitting that I have a WoW account. Mostly to mock those that play it religiously, but I have one. Guess I'm the only guy who was in the beta and still never managed to get a max level toon, but hey...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    35. Re:To Everyone... by sabt-pestnu · · Score: 1

      > Nobody else ever has anything to show for how they have spent their time that has any value to me. I was born, I know that I will die, what's inbetween is mine.

      Including that beautiful digital watch...

    36. Re:To Everyone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That quote is NOT from William Shatner - its from the character 'Jason Nesmith' in the movie Galaxy Quest - a parody of Star Trek et al.

    37. Re:To Everyone... by nine-times · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It might also be applied to people who spend every hour of every night for years building their own hot rod or ships in bottles or whatever.

      You might even argue that it applies to people who work their whole lives to achieve fame and fortune. It's not uncommon for those people to neglect some of their personal relationships or have other parts of their lives suffer. Often enough, they end up losing their fortune to some degree or failing in other pursuits. Eventually, sooner or later, those people will die anyway, and it's not clear that they're better off in death than any of us. It's all pointless from a certain perspective.

      So cheer up, all you WoW players. Your WoW-filled lives aren't any worse than a guy who has millions of dollars and bangs supermodels!

    38. Re:To Everyone... by oldspewey · · Score: 1

      You have a strange concept of "success."

      I can think of literally dozens of things I'm thankful for, without regretting for a moment that I haven't won the Olympics or appeared in a recent newspaper headline.

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    39. Re:To Everyone... by oldspewey · · Score: 1

      A few with just pot (coupled with a profound lack of ambition), and a few with pot as "something to do" in between binges of harder stuff.

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    40. Re:To Everyone... by denmarkw00t · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Okay, but I think far more people would find value in a handcrafted ship-in-a-bottle, or a hot rod built by hunting down the parts needed, taking the time to learn the engineering, and applying that into a working restoration of a vehicle. On top of that, these things also tend to carry value both socially and monetarily, as well as a sense of accomplishment that actually carries on past the "fading" point likely to be felt with the WoW accomplishment. Doing things like building a car or a house or spending months perfecting a masterpiece of oil and canvas open people up to more social exposure than, say, having some friends over to check out your paladin. You can drive your hot rod, take it to shows, hell even be a guest speaker in an auto-mechanics class. A composition of music could be enjoyed for hundreds of years by audiences you never imagined. Your WoW account, however, will likely not be heralded as a feat of great accomplishment outside of a small community of others seeking to achieve in even the modest task which is their charge: level up.

    41. Re:To Everyone... by John+Whitley · · Score: 1

      In fact it can be said about every living human being who choose to do something different from what you choose to do with your time. "They should get a life."

      I don't find that most folks are really that myopic. Those who work towards goals understandable to others don't tend to receive the "getalife" tag. Athleticism is widely valued and understood. This is especially so for Olympic athletes, who tend to receive admiration even from those who eschew mainstream sports. Likewise, many people appreciate those who show skill in building tangible things (e.g. hotrods, etc.), even if those things are somewhat esoteric. It's not the time invested, but rather our value judgment of the activity weighed against the invested time. Someone who games moderately doesn't necessarily get tagged; we all have our ways of kicking back and relaxing. Someone who obsessively games probably gets a measure of "get a life" from folks. Activities that aren't perceived as building "real-world" skill or producing anything are generally looked down on (ala ye olde TV-era couch potato).

    42. Re:To Everyone... by nameer · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, its an SNL skit. I was Shatner. http://snltranscripts.jt.org/86/86hgetalife.phtml

      --
      "Uh... yeah, Brain, but where are we going to find rubber pants our size?" --Pinky
    43. Re:To Everyone... by Dg93 · · Score: 2, Informative

      You might want to learn to use the google before you spout off, you might find out that this quote is from a 1986 appearance on Saturday Night Live by William Shatner, which predates galaxy quest by about 13 years.

      --
      --Dg
    44. Re:To Everyone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't exactly call typing 'gratz' or 'nubz' socialising.

    45. Re:To Everyone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have no desire to see art and I especially hate certain of the folks in their hot rods who:

      Go down the street, make a ton of noise, and otherwise ruin my day by being total jerkwad drivers just because they have to show off.

      Oh wait, does that mean that people can have a negative impact on others?

      Maybe we'd all be better off if these people stopped hotrodding their cars.

      I could also make a case for music, which often combines with cars insofar as the folks who blast noise out of their speakers.

      Thanks for that.

      Yeah, can we make them play WOW instead? I bet it will cost society less! Think of the benefits.

    46. Re:To Everyone... by kenp2002 · · Score: 1

      Why in God's green Earth would imply people on Slashdot are disporortionally less socially active?

      --
      -=[ Who Is John Galt? ]=-
    47. Re:To Everyone... by ShakaUVM · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Uh, what do you mean he won't be heralded as a great achiever? There's a front page story about him on Slashdot, which is more fame than your hypothetical ship-in-a-bottle builder will ever see.

      Even IF all the posts on here are mocking him. William Hung is famous too, right?

    48. Re:To Everyone... by RJBeery · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And when you complete your hot rod or your oil painting will it be a newsworthy event? The fact that we're all discussing this guy and that I just spent a few minutes studying his profile (and I don't even play WoW!) is testament against your point.

    49. Re:To Everyone... by superslacker87 · · Score: 1

      I was going to say, "you're confusing it with Galaxy Quest," but then I clicked your link and it pretty much ruined my joke.

      --
      I run Ubuntu skinned to look like a Mac on a PC. Go figure.
    50. Re:To Everyone... by Sprouticus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      ahh but ther point you make assume I place the same value on those things as everyone else. If I choose to place value on other things, then your opinion is not valid in MY eyes.

      Ships in a bottle are a waste of time, get a life
      Sports are a waste of time, get a life.
      Making money is a waste of time, get a life.
      Going to bars to meet girls is a waste of time, get a life
      Sex is a waste of time, get a life.

      All of these are transient, as are all things. You can argue some have more value than others but that value is relative to the people involved. It is primarily a cultural and societal construct.

      We can argue that pursuits which return goods or money may have more value for basic every day needs (food, water, shelter, etc) but that is not really what we are talking about here. You can also argue that even those have no real value in the long run. Same with sciene or art. In 20,000 years the Beatles wont matter.

      How is an olympian served by the dogged pursuit of a gold mdeal in cross country skiing. Longer life...MAYBE. But in reality moderate excersise along with using the extra time to make $$ for your health care and housing in the future is probably better in that regard.

      Simply put, do what YOU love, fuck the rest of the world. Most people are idiots anyways.

    51. Re:To Everyone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dont know about getting a life but LIVING in the real world would do wounders for your love lives and relationships... if my Husband spent we will say the time on me that he does with WOW i just know smiles on everyones faces would show that family and real are important... dont get me wrong playing wow for a little while is ok .. his way of destressing and i understand that... but 12 hrs at a time give me a break...

    52. Re:To Everyone... by BooRolla · · Score: 1

      I'd be willing to trade for a day or two though.

    53. Re:To Everyone... by KnownIssues · · Score: 1

      Damn it, Jim! I'm a doctor, not a social anthropologist!

    54. Re:To Everyone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So cheer up, all you WoW players. Your WoW-filled lives aren't any worse than a guy who has millions of dollars and bangs supermodels!

      Yes, they are.

      -- Guy who has millions of dollars and bangs supermodels

    55. Re:To Everyone... by pwfffff · · Score: 1

      What's that? Success is subjective, and therefore nobody really cares whether or not he is "somebody [you] would consider to be a resounding success in the real world"?

      It's almost like you got my point.

    56. Re:To Everyone... by pwfffff · · Score: 1

      Thanks for letting everyone know just how out of the loop you are, AC. Not only do most people raid with at least one or two people they know IRL, but a lot of guilds are actually social communities that existed long before WoW. In my guild forums are countless threads of screenshots and discussions about the 'good old days' when it was just a few friends playing Yahoo games together. I know this 'social internet' thing must be new to you since you don't even know how to make a slashdot account, but it's been around for a while.

    57. Re:To Everyone... by Oneamp · · Score: 1

      This is precisely why I stopped playing WOW. At the end of the day, all you've done is move some bits around on a server somewhere. If you're building a ship in a bottle, at least you have a ship in a bottle. I do miss the people I used to play with, (we had a lot of fun together) but you can never, "beat," or "win," WOW. WOW is like the proverbial carrot on a stick, you can get the best armor/weapons there are, but periodically Blizzard just moves the carrot a bit further away.

      --
      Increase my killing power, eh?
    58. Re:To Everyone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Nah, seriously.... if you thing being a millionaire banging supermodels is equivalent to a night of wrist action (WOW or otherwise), then it's high time to get out to a nudie bar!

    59. Re:To Everyone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And this guy spent months perfecting his WoW account and millions are in awe of what he has done.
      If your only measure of an activity's worth is how much other people admire it, you live only for their admiration and not for yourself.

    60. Re:To Everyone... by Astatine · · Score: 1

      This is precisely why I stopped building ships in bottles. At the end of the day, all you've done is move some atoms around on a planet somewhere.

    61. Re:To Everyone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those of us who do have lives, are still okay to encourage others to get lives though, right?

      There was a point in my life, where I didn't have a life. But you have a choice, you always do, just about everyday: retreat or advance; do something new, or stick to the same old. You have to have the courage to give up the familiar enjoyments, the fleeting pleasures, to find something deeper and longer lasting. Won't happen overnight, might take a couple years, but its possible for anyone.

    62. Re:To Everyone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So basically what you are saying is that everyone should do what other people find appropriate, enjoyable, and or valuable despite how they may rate it personally?

    63. Re:To Everyone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot has tech news??? Who knew.

    64. Re:To Everyone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, but I think far more people would find value in a handcrafted ship-in-a-bottle, or a hot rod built by hunting down the parts needed, taking the time to learn the engineering, and applying that into a working restoration of a vehicle. On top of that, these things also tend to carry value both socially and monetarily, as well as a sense of accomplishment that actually carries on past the "fading" point likely to be felt with the WoW accomplishment. Doing things like building a car or a house or spending months perfecting a masterpiece of oil and canvas open people up to more social exposure than, say, having some friends over to check out your paladin. You can drive your hot rod, take it to shows, hell even be a guest speaker in an auto-mechanics class. A composition of music could be enjoyed for hundreds of years by audiences you never imagined. Your WoW account, however, will likely not be heralded as a feat of great accomplishment outside of a small community of others seeking to achieve in even the modest task which is their charge: level up.

      So the only things in life that you're allowed to enjoy are activities that a majority of other people also enjoy?

    65. Re:To Everyone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having just read that transcript, I suddenly figured out: The fandom is just the male equivalent of women's celebrity fandom.

      The niggly little details ("How many? How much did it cost?"), the dramas on stage and off, blow by blows, etc., etc.,. It's just like how so many follow celebrity gossip.

    66. Re:To Everyone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, its an SNL skit. I was Shatner.

      You were?! Cool.

    67. Re:To Everyone... by snuf23 · · Score: 1

      Do you think if you removed the pot they would become full of ambition? I agree that weed can lead to a desire to do know more than eat junk food and play video games (or watch cartoons) but I not sure that chronic lack of ambition solely comes from the use of weed.

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    68. Re:To Everyone... by snuf23 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "at least you have a ship in a bottle."

      Which is useful in what way? If the goal is to acquire a ship in a bottle you can save your time and buy one already assembled.
      Clearly the point of making a ship in a bottle is the challenge of the task and enjoyment one derives through the process.
      The only real value of the resulting ship in a bottle is as a memento to remind you of the process you went through to make it.

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    69. Re:To Everyone... by Caboosian · · Score: 1

      So cheer up, all you WoW players. Your WoW-filled lives aren't any worse than a guy who has millions of dollars and bangs supermodels!

      ...eehh...

    70. Re:To Everyone... by Velimir · · Score: 1

      Mmm, actually, if the banging of supermodels results in offspring then that guy is evolutionarily better off... But I see everything through evolution being a biologist and all. :)

    71. Re:To Everyone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We all know the fact that the time invested in a endeavor like this has to be, the less to say, astronomical, but I know a lot of permanently disabled people who's only way of socializing is chatting with someone else at the shadow of a meeting stone while the raid gets ready.

      For the sake of my remaining faith in humanity I'll really like to think that this is the case.

    72. Re:To Everyone... by PaganRitual · · Score: 1

      but I think far more people would find value

      This is the part that always sends me off the edge when reading the assorted bullshit justifications or derisions of what someone else chooses to do with their life.

      At the expense of a long ranting post that will serve just as much purpose as a short and to the point one, I'll stay short and get straight to the point :

      If you care, in the slightest, about what someone else thinks of what you yourself do with your own time, then you've already clearly, totally and absolutely, 'lost' whatever apparent competition you think that life is about.

      Okay, here comes the rant anyway. I do have to take issue with this part :

      Doing things like building a car or a house or spending months perfecting a masterpiece of oil and canvas open people up to more social exposure than, say, having some friends over to check out your paladin.

      Shit, I didn't get the memo about social exposure being the point in life. I suppose if I'd been told that, I would have strived to be something that would raise other peoples opinions of me and, you know, actually cared about what other people thought in the first place. Damnit, I've been doing it all wrong this whole time! I thought my life was mine to live. I've wasted my life. In 100 years when we all sit down and compare where we're up to in our strive to be noticed we'll ... hmmm.

      You can drive your hot rod, take it to shows, hell even be a guest speaker in an auto-mechanics class. A composition of music could be enjoyed for hundreds of years by audiences you never imagined.

      This is actually a good point, basically your justification is that what you've done will be heralded as a feat of great accomplishment in the small community of others. This is a good thing, right? Because we've already established that what other people think of your achievements is clearly the whole point to everything, so that's okay.

      Your WoW account, however, will likely not be heralded as a feat of great accomplishment outside of a small community of others

      Oh. Hang on, but you said that ... and then you said that ... well, fuck, I'm confused now.

      I really shouldn't read threads like this. Endless spouting by people trying to convince others that their constant striving for for approval from everyone else is the right way to live just irritate me to no end.

    73. Re:To Everyone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your WoW-filled lives aren't any worse than a guy who has millions of dollars and bangs supermodels!

      I beg to differ.

    74. Re:To Everyone... by Dracolytch · · Score: 1

      I agree with a lot of this... The one thing that I've found that turns this on it's head is when people stop doing things for themselves, and start doing things for other people, the "get a life" starts sounding pretty empty.

      "Beating wow is a waste of time, get a life"
      "Hoarding money is a waste of time, get a life"
      "Trying to get ahead at your job is a waste of time, get a life"

      Vs.

      "Reducing world hunger is a waste of time, get a life"
      "Helping people live longer, happier lives is a waste of time, get a life"
      "Making people smile is a waste of time, get a life"

      I know someone will argue that it's social stigma that will make it so that few people are willing to say doing good deeds for others is a waste of time.

      That said, I honestly, deeply, believe that most of the things I do for myself are largely a waste of time... The long-term perspective can make many important acts feel hollow and worthless. But helping make the world a better place for those around me? It's an act of defiance against a cold and uncaring universe... It's one of the few things I can think of that DOES matter.

      The beauty is not in succeeding in the fight against the inevitable... The beauty is the fight itself.

      ~D

      --
      This sig has been enciphered with a one-time pad. It could say almost anything.
    75. Re:To Everyone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same can be said about every Olympic or World Champion in just about any sport. It might also be applied to people who spend every hour of every night for years building their own hot rod or ships in bottles or whatever.
      In fact it can be said about every living human being who choose to do something different from what you choose to do with your time. "They should get a life."
      Nobody else ever has anything to show for how they have spent their time that has any value to me. I was born, I know that I will die, what's inbetween is mine.

      If you zoom into pure subjectivity and say "this is all that matters to ME, so there", nobody can argue with you, but...

      (a) Other pursuits listed do not take up 100% of your waking life + a fair fraction of what ought to be sleep time to ensure functionality the next day (and I think we're all going under the assumption that the achievement here reported would necessitate this level of commitment). This is particularly true for sports people, where you can't possibly spend that much time on your pursuit, or you end up overtrained within a few months.

      (b) Other pursuits bring incidental rewards, even if you are not interested in them and are "only doing it for the love" of the pursuit. In fact, normally, the more dedicated you are (as in (a)), the more incidental rewards you get. What this means is that normally an enormous achievement in your nominated field of endeavour carries with it some outside reward - it contributes to your welfare and the welfare of your family in some way.

      There is a class of pursuits that (a) demands ALL of your time and (b) gives you nothing but instant gratification for the duration in return. They're called addictions. So comparing this achievement with sports/hobbies etc isn't really right. Instead, we should be comparing it to a headline that reads "Man shoots up the most heroin EVER!!!"

      Which brings up another point. What makes this particularly pathetic is that the achievement here is entirely artificial. You can never say that someone's shot up all the heroin in the world, only that they've shot up more than anyone else has ever managed. This is because in most addictions, there is no real limit beyond what your body and circumstances can tolerate. Whereas for this man, the terminus of his addiction was set by other not particularly inspiring humans - not ones that provided competition, but ones that created the maze. Hence - futile. Like doing ALL the connect-the-dots puzzles in the world.

      Actually, thinking about this, something like mountaineering has a peak, doesn't it? Don't know. Maybe someone can explain to me what I'm trying to say in the previous paragraph.

    76. Re:To Everyone... by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 1

      I don't mind admitting that I have a WoW account. Mostly to mock those that play it religiously, but I have one.

      I wasn't aware you needed an account to do this. Loser.
      :-P

      --
      Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
    77. Re:To Everyone... by b1t+r0t · · Score: 1

      ...and thus the circle is complete.

      And FYI, Galaxy Quest, while a genre parody, was mostly based on the cliches of Star Trek and its fandom. And especially its actors.

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    78. Re:To Everyone... by sydneyfong · · Score: 1

      After all, after his own personal sense of accomplishment over this feat has faded, he's going to be left looking back at all the time he spent on it, and the fact that he ultimately has nothing of any value to show for it. That can be very depressing.

      It depends on how much you personally subscribe to the social norms.

      --
      Don't quote me on this.
    79. Re:To Everyone... by brkello · · Score: 1

      I don't know. Tiger Woods doesn't seem too happy these days.

      --
      Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
    80. Re:To Everyone... by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Video, or it didn’t happen!

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  12. I wonder if any of the 11 hugged him back.... by Madman · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't have personally, I'm afraid I'd get a fatal case of patheticness

    1. Re:I wonder if any of the 11 hugged him back.... by hollywench · · Score: 2, Funny

      :p Not likely, if he was going for the achievement where you /hug a dead player..

    2. Re:I wonder if any of the 11 hugged him back.... by Golddess · · Score: 1

      Having not played WoW, I found it rather odd that TFS made mention of the /hugging 11 players like it was part of what constituted "beating" WoW. I was thinking "why 11? why not 12, 13, 1024, etc?"

      So I have to ask, are you serious when you say there is an achievement for /hugging a dead player, or are you just making a joke?

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    3. Re:I wonder if any of the 11 hugged him back.... by Coopa · · Score: 1

      I had a google - it appears it is an achievement to hug a dead player before they release their corpse

      http://www.wowhead.com/?achievement=247

    4. Re:I wonder if any of the 11 hugged him back.... by OakDragon · · Score: 1

      it appears it is an achievement to hug a dead player before they release their corpse

      What is the significance of this? (Not a WoW player...)

    5. Re:I wonder if any of the 11 hugged him back.... by hollywench · · Score: 1

      Seriously. There's the achievement you definitely get for hugging a dead enemy (screenshot: http://www.blogcdn.com/www.wowinsider.com/media/2008/09/wowscrnshot_090108_234205.jpg its the highlighted one) Details: http://www.wowhead.com/?achievement=247 Then there's the achievement for hugging every animal in Azeroth. No, I'm not kidding. "To all the Squirrels I've Loved before" http://www.wowhead.com/?achievement=1206 and its sequel "To All The Squirrels Who Shared My Life" http://www.wowhead.com/?achievement=2557

    6. Re:I wonder if any of the 11 hugged him back.... by DarkProphet · · Score: 1

      Yep, its real achievement.

      Make Love, Not Warcraft.

      There is an episode of South Park by the same name that mocks WoW. This achievement was Blizzard's tongue-in-cheek response to that.

      --
      What could possibly hurt the security of the American people more than giving our own government the ability to hide its
  13. I beat it ages ago by unbug · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I stopped playing.

    1. Re:I beat it ages ago by Daetrin · · Score: 5, Funny

      A strange game. The only winning move is not to play.

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    2. Re:I beat it ages ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I stopped playing.

      When I play, I do so for fun. Not to beat it. Which isn't all that different to most games I play. It's just a game...

    3. Re:I beat it ages ago by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 5, Funny

      High Five brother. I beat a 2.5 year long WoWcrack addiction myself years ago. I still remember it like it was yesterday. Those long, back-knotted nights of failed Stratholme runs and epic fails. Noobs causing my blood pressure to rise exponentially in the Arathi Highlands....The cold chills of the 4 AM morning air nipping at my underwear-shod body, the only thing driving my spirit was the pipe dream of epic loots and bragging rights in Ironforge. Before Illidan. Before Arthas. Back when you knew how dedicated a WoW player was based on how high their fishing skill was....

      *shudder*

      I was one of the few ones lucky enough to turn away from that hell with my life still intact. I feel a bond with others I meet that were able to do the same. Stand strong my friend...relapse is easy.

    4. Re:I beat it ages ago by dm0527 · · Score: 1

      wow...geek movie reference got missed there by a few folks ;)
      /loves the WarGames

      --
      - dm - The two most common elements in the universe are Hydrogen and stupidity.
    5. Re:I beat it ages ago by interval1066 · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of the tv commercial a few years back here in the States where a sweaty pulse beater looks up from a console and proudly exclaims "I got to the end of the internet."

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    6. Re:I beat it ages ago by BobMcD · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I was one of the few ones lucky enough to turn away from that hell with my life still intact. I feel a bond with others I meet that were able to do the same. Stand strong my friend...relapse is easy.

      Since it seems you're being serious, I'd like to respectfully disagree.

      World of Warcraft is a social game played via the internet. The degree of 'hell' you endure is completely, totally, entirely a product of the choices YOU make. The degree of addiction you suffer attached to the game is likewise a product of YOUR OWN deficiencies. To lay all the blame of your unhappiness on this or any video game is completely irresponsible.

      If you find dealing with random people on the internet to be unbearable, look into personality training. If you find internet games to be an addictive force that dominate your life, look into self-control/addiction support.

      Meanwhile thank God you didn't accidentally wander into a casino or a crack house instead.

      To be clear - I feel you've made the right choice, but I feel that placing the responsibility on the game itself undermines the millions of people who have not lost their lives to it.

    7. Re:I beat it ages ago by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't see where the parent was blaming the game. He said he beat the addiction and was glad to do so, and gave details on how strong the addiction could be.

      How is that blaming the game?

      If anything he owned up to it. It seems to me you're being very mean to person simply because he succumbed in the past to an addiction. There, but for the grace of God, go a lot of people. Having a predilection to weakness is called being human, and if you are going to bash someone who is willing to expose a weakness that he _overcame_ then perhaps you are the one who should seek personality training.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    8. Re:I beat it ages ago by SYSS+Mouse · · Score: 1

      When did Warcraft include nuclear war?

    9. Re:I beat it ages ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Congratulations. You have earned the RL achievement of not playing WoW."

      [They should send this to inactive accounts after a few months :-)]

    10. Re:I beat it ages ago by bkr1_2k · · Score: 1

      Seriously? You thought that wasn't a joke?

      --
      "Growing old is inevitable; growing up is optional."
    11. Re:I beat it ages ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean like The Game?

    12. Re:I beat it ages ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be clear - I feel you've made the right choice, but I feel that placing the responsibility on the game itself undermines the millions of people who have not lost their lives to it.

      You mean, the ones that haven't played it?

    13. Re:I beat it ages ago by frenchgates · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In the immortal words of Foghorn Leghorn, I say, I say, slow down there, boy! Do you have a bone to pick with the idea of addiction as a disease as opposed to a personal failing? It's a legitimate topic for debate, but the poster didn't make a statement one way or the other. Or are you a WoW fanboi leaping to its defense reflexively? Because the poster never really disparaged the game either, just his own experiences playing it.

      --
      Syntax error: loose != lose, affect != effect, then!=than
    14. Re:I beat it ages ago by cyphercell · · Score: 1

      Bob, you're an idiot.

      --
      Under the influence of Post-Cyberpunk Gonzo Journalism
    15. Re:I beat it ages ago by BobMcD · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I can be mean, to be sure, and would really appreciate any personality input you may offer. But I think you're just not reading the same inflection on the words that I am.

      I was one of the few ones lucky enough to turn away from that hell with my life still intact.

      Either this is hyperbole, or you're the one reading it wrong.

      This is what I read:

      one of the few ones

      This statement implies that only the minority 'escape'. This implies, in turn, that is normal to be unable to escape, or otherwise the majority would be able to do so.

      lucky enough

      This implies that only enough luck allows you to escape. Not differences in individuals, choices, etc - just chance. Use of the word 'luck' implies that this is a rare and fortuitous occasion.

      with my life still intact

      In the context here, the statement is that the 'hell' frequently renders lives no longer in tact.

      Now its your turn. Show me where the parent owns up to anything at all. Because whatever you're seeing, I really did miss it, and it seems I have something to learn here.

    16. Re:I beat it ages ago by Phred+T.+Magnificent · · Score: 1

      Damn, you beat me to it :D

      --
      Where is the wisdom we have lost in knowledge?
      Where is the knowledge we have lost in information?
    17. Re:I beat it ages ago by pclminion · · Score: 1

      Where the hell did he even IMPLICITLY place blame on the game? I see that nowhere in his comment.

    18. Re:I beat it ages ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personal responsibility? GTFO n00b!

    19. Re:I beat it ages ago by Saithe · · Score: 1

      A strange game. The only winning move is not to play.

      You, sir, just won the thread with this epic quote :p

    20. Re:I beat it ages ago by dzfoo · · Score: 1

      Get off the darn WOPR and get back to work, Joshua!

              -dZ.

      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
    21. Re:I beat it ages ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      entirely a product of the choices YOU make
       
      Nobody's saying the game is responsible, everyone clearly knows people are responsible for their own actions. Same with real life. Yet there are druggies and drunks. There are over-eaters. There are people with defense mechanisms, but really that's just being addicted to a certain type of behavior to make your problems go away, which is pretty much the way you would define most addictions.
       
      Many of these people are not stupid. The issue is that humans in general have a problem with addiction, extreme behavior, and the feeling of pressure due to problems piling up or the belief that one cannot deal with certain issues, or a certain amount of them. All types of people experience these in one way or another.
       
      And your solution is simply "smarten up" or "ask for help"? If this is your advice to someone with an addiction, these suggestions won't exactly seem constructive.

    22. Re:I beat it ages ago by digitalunity · · Score: 1

      WoW is the ultimate skinner box. It feeds you diminishing returns for exponentially more time consuming effort.

      For every realm out there, there is probably 1000+ addicts who spend 40+ hours weekly playing the game trying to improve their stats, gear and skill.

      Most people are susceptible to addiction in one form or another, be that physical addictions like alcohol, coke, meth or be that psychological addictions like video games, marijuana, sex or gambling. The extent to which a person is addictive varies greatly, but it's present in all life. For anyone prone to addiction, hard work may play a part in beating their demons but I have no doubt that luck plays a part as well.

      --
      You can't legislate goodness. Let each to his own destiny, by will of his freely made choices.
    23. Re:I beat it ages ago by Stickfight · · Score: 1

      "Wait, no, that one also loses."

    24. Re:I beat it ages ago by protein+folder · · Score: 1

      The cold chills of the 4 AM morning air nipping at my underwear-shod body

      OK, I never played warcraft so I don't know about most of what the hell you're talking about, but I have to ask why you were wearing underwear as shoes!

      --
      Your mind is squeezed by a blast of pain!
    25. Re:I beat it ages ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't see a single sentence in the GP's comment where he blames his problems on the game itself, rather than on his own addiction to it.

      I think you misinterpreted his comment about being "one of the lucky few" to mean that the game itself destroys peoples' lives. The way I read it, he was just stating the obvious truth that many, many people who play WoW end up being severely addicted to it. I wouldn't go so far as to say that it's the game's fault, and I don't think that's what the GP meant either. However, compared to other games, WoW is the kind of game that can be dangerous to someone who already has a predilection for addictive behavior, much the same way that there are millions of alcohol addicts, but not so many orange juice addicts. There's something intrinsic about the alcohol (the way it makes you feel, the fact that it gets you drunk, etc) that makes it a common addiction. The same is true for WoW - there is something intrinsic about the game itself such that it has a much stronger pull on addiction-prone people than other games. You still can't blame the game for the addiction, just like you can't blame beer companies for alcoholism. But that's not the same as saying that the game itself isn't dangerous to addicts.

    26. Re:I beat it ages ago by don_bear_wilkinson · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you'd prefer a nice game of chess or maybe global thermonuclear war?

      --
      In Nature, stupidity is a capital offense. In human society, too many get off with less than a warning.
    27. Re:I beat it ages ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I knew it was time to quit when I realized that I could not get through a whole night of raiding without a glass or two. Sad, really. So I quit (WoW, not drinking.)

    28. Re:I beat it ages ago by nine-times · · Score: 1

      To be clear - I feel you've made the right choice, but I feel that placing the responsibility on the game itself undermines the millions of people who have not lost their lives to it.

      I see your point, but couldn't you say the same about anything that's addictive? "Placing responsibility on the heroin undermines the millions of people who have tried heroin and have not lost their lives to it." Sure, that's true, but clearly heroin plays a role.

      No, I'm not saying WoW is comparable to heroin. I only mean to point out that nothing is all that addictive all by itself. Different people fall prey to different addictions, but certainly some things carry more danger of addiction than other things.

    29. Re:I beat it ages ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WoW is the ultimate skinner box.

      WoW is not an addiction. I used to suck dick for coke. Now that's an addiction, man. You ever suck some dick for WoW?

    30. Re:I beat it ages ago by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 1

      Since it seems you're being serious....

      Hehehehe, and that was the assumption that made the rest of your post one epic bucket of failure bucko =P

    31. Re:I beat it ages ago by sabt-pestnu · · Score: 1

      Perhaps when Warcraft became a card game?.

      But say, do you have change for 25 million people?

    32. Re:I beat it ages ago by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 1

      Although, in all seriousness, I did play WoW in a fairly dedicated manner for two and a half years and did find it quite refreshing when I moved on with my life. But of course, satire often seems lost on the masses.

    33. Re:I beat it ages ago by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 1

      Real gamers wear their underwear on their feet ;)

    34. Re:I beat it ages ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The cold chills of the 4 AM morning air nipping at my underwear-shod body, the only thing driving my spirit was the pipe dream of epic loots and bragging rights in Ironforge.

      You do know that you can play a game in moderation, right? When the clock hits 1AM, you can always decide to go to bed. Or when it hits 11PM you might watch a movie instead of grinding that last hour.

      relapse is easy

      No it isn't. You have to consciously make the choice to install the client, patch it, whip out ye olde credit card, renew your subscription, and type in your username and password. At each moment you can just say "Nah, I'm not going to spend my free time this way" and walk away. It's that easy. Even if you do decide to install it and play it for a few days, quitting it is as simple as picking up a good book, getting another hobby, or vegetating in front of the TV. What you define as "relapse" is obsessive behaviour in my opinion.

      I'm the last person to criticize you for playing a game, how you spend your time is your own choice, but if you stop caring about the people and events around you, don't casually brush that off as "I'm addicted to a videogame that came from the devil", but instead as "I have a problem with self-control".

    35. Re:I beat it ages ago by Tibia1 · · Score: 1

      I would've never played if it was anything like that. Sure, it can be considered a huge waste of time, but I've had countless sick and memorable moments on world of warcraft, and over 10 gamecards to brag about it. Of course I've quit now for university, and plus I'm much more entertained with mw2, where there isn't a special town that I get to sit in for 1/3 of my total play time.

    36. Re:I beat it ages ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "underwear-shod body"

      You were wearing underwear on your *feet*?

      Or maybe you meant 'underwear-*clad*'

    37. Re:I beat it ages ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's pretty clear from the phrasing that the relevant post in question uses that they do indeed lay blame at the feet of the game. Just as other useless addicts lay blame at the feet of drugs, money, casinos, whores, or even their friends for not stopping them from making terrible choices. If you can't control yourself then you SHOULD self destruct and die. Let natural selection take its course.

    38. Re:I beat it ages ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow... I take the most enormous pride in not knowing WTF you are going on about.

    39. Re:I beat it ages ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be clear - I feel you've made the right choice, but I feel that placing the responsibility on the game itself undermines the millions of people who have not lost their lives to it.

      Then perhaps you should stop putting the responsibility on the game.

      The parent never mentioned it was the games fault. Your post is the first and only one to do so.

      So I ask, why are YOU blaming the game for other peoples addiction when there are millions of people who have not lost their lives to it?

    40. Re:I beat it ages ago by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

      I used to joke about my WoW "addiction," then I heard some sociologist guy made a serious argument about the analogies between virtual and real addictions. Much of my obsession with the game really was a kind of addiction, which became really evident after trying to "quit for good" about 2-3 times. Sure, it wasn't as serious as huffing on a crack pipe, but WoW can be addictive. Here's the great thing about quitting. All the little things I would neglect get taken care of. That fan with the loose blade, no more unfolded laundry or dishes piling up until I'm out of forks, having time to work out since I'm not burning a couple hours after work.

      I apply this rule to video games in general that I've recently given up. While they're fun diversions, they insidiously eat away and even your life after a while.

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    41. Re:I beat it ages ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Addiction is not a byproduct, it's specifically designed into the game. Yes it affects different people differently, but don't tell me the maker is immune to culpability.

    42. Re:I beat it ages ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about a nice game of chess?

    43. Re:I beat it ages ago by Dracolytch · · Score: 1

      You're already at +5... Consider yourself at +6 or more.

      ~D

      --
      This sig has been enciphered with a one-time pad. It could say almost anything.
    44. Re:I beat it ages ago by BarMonger · · Score: 1

      I never understood how it came to that conclusion. A huge thermonuclear war would 'kill all humans'. Isn't that the ultimate goal of any artificial intelligence?

    45. Re:I beat it ages ago by prometx42 · · Score: 1

      Awwwww, snap!!!

    46. Re:I beat it ages ago by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      Well, if you read it literally then I guess that's a reasonable interpretation. It's just that people usually speak in those terms when talking about these kinds of things. I guess the original person would have to speak up to settle the issue.

      I would suspect that it wasn't literally luck (i.e., just by random) that the person quit his addiction. Maybe something random inspired him, like a comment from someone or reading an article about addiction or some other random inspiration, but quitting any addiction is usually a difficult process, and not something that is going to happen without a whole lot of effort and suffering on the part of the person doing it.

      I definitely have an addictive-type personality although I've never had any problem per se with addictions. There's a fine line between the kinds of obsessions that can undergird real accomplishments and the kind of obsessions that cause harm. I've certainly been "addicted" to reading TVTropes.org lately, but that doesn't mean I've neglected other things to do so, it's just taken up a large chunk of my free time that perhaps could be spent better, but isn't being excessively wasted either. After all, it's important to know such deep narrative concepts as "Mary Sue" and "Lampshade Hanging". ;-)

      Given that predilection, I am perhaps a little less critical of people who genuinely succumb to harmful addictions, at least when they are able to overcome them successfully. There but for the grace of God go I, I sometimes wonder.

      And in terms of the language he used, I certainly consider myself lucky to have had a good job that hasn't laid me off in almost 3 years (as opposed to the 3 before... stupid volatile software industry...). I consider myself lucky to have a wonderful wife and 4 great kids. None of these things however, happened by chance.

      Similarly, while this person considers himself lucky to have defeated his addiction, unless it was something as extreme as being forced to quit because he was in prison, or lost his job and literally couldn't afford the fees, there is little doubt in my mind that there wasn't a significant effort on his part to do so.

      Anyhow, I guess I'm just giving the poor dope the benefit of the doubt. Maybe you are right and I'm being too nice.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    47. Re:I beat it ages ago by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      Although I've never played WoW and have no interesting in MMO games, I definitely do like a lot of similar stuff and see the appeal of, and have played many games, where the "level grind" is an element. There is something that seems to appeal directly to the Upper Paleolithic Hunter-Gatherer element of our minds in games with these kinds of progressions. I can see how people get addicted even though I've never had that problem.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  14. What an achievement ! by princessproton · · Score: 3, Funny

    Can I just be the first to say..."WoW!"

    --
    I'm always positive; it's my nature.
  15. There's still only one master of WoW by Madman · · Score: 2, Funny

    Liiiiiitttttllllllleeeee Grrrrreeeeeeyyyyyyy!!! just doesn't have the same ring as LEERROOOOOOOOOOOY JEEEEENNNKKKIIIINNNSSS!!!!

    1. Re:There's still only one master of WoW by daid303 · · Score: 1

      Indeed, you know you've won if they name a title and achievement after you.

  16. Sense of purpose by zrbyte · · Score: 1

    "Wow, I've beaten WOW !!! Ok sweet! Now what?"

    1. Re:Sense of purpose by Shadyman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Just wait until the next expansion comes out.

    2. Re:Sense of purpose by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Funny

      See if your shower still works?

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    3. Re:Sense of purpose by Jeian · · Score: 1

      More accurately, until the next major patch (3.3) comes out in a few weeks and adds more achievements...

    4. Re:Sense of purpose by Prien715 · · Score: 1

      Time to get an alt;)

      --
      -- Political fascism requires a Fuhrer.
    5. Re:Sense of purpose by pwfffff · · Score: 1

      Same thing you do when you beat the Superbowl? Go to Disneyland? Wait for the next one?

      Do you only do shit you get a trophy for?

      Please tell us, what's YOUR purpose?

  17. Re:insert joke here by Stele · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What does homosexuality have to do with it?

  18. All those achivements ... by Viol8 · · Score: 1

    ... and yet he's probably still on 0 RL hugs and 0 RL girlfriends.

    1. Re:All those achivements ... by Dan667 · · Score: 2, Funny

      RL stands for reaking liches right?

    2. Re:All those achivements ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      since when there is a goal in real life? you think you won the real life game by having grand-children and a big family? Or by collecting girlfriends? wake up!
      the cake is a lie. There is no goal to complete. There is just what the society want you to do.

    3. Re:All those achivements ... by shentino · · Score: 1

      Maybe this is where religion comes in.

      You may have only 1 life but a continue is pretty nice ;)

    4. Re:All those achivements ... by m.ducharme · · Score: 1

      since when there is a goal in real life? you think you won the real life game by having grand-children and a big family?

      Yes. In terms of personal achievement, passing on your genes is the only thing that really matters.

      /hyperbole

      but seriously, passing on your genes is more than just a social imperative, you know. It's kinda the point of the whole evolution thing. One may of course have other goals, and even value those goals more, but for most of us having a family is a physical, not a social imperative.

      --
      Rule of Slashdot #0: You and people like you are not representative of the larger population. - A.C.
    5. Re:All those achivements ... by lazy_nihilist · · Score: 1

      Amen.

  19. seriously? by Darth_brooks · · Score: 1

    and nothing of value was gained.

    --
    There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
    1. Re:seriously? by dtml-try+MyNick · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily, I'm pretty sure his account is worth big bucks.. 4 figure numbers in dollars.

      If he's smart he sells that account before the next expansion hits. That way he at least gained something useful out of it.

      --
      Life starts at the end of your comfort zone.
    2. Re:seriously? by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

      I wasn't aware achievements and completed quests were increasing the price of accounts now - I figured it was all still in Levels and Gear. When I quit - I had 5/8 of the best PvP gear available and 3/8 of the second best - and the rest (ring + trinkets) as well, but I still couldn't demand more than a couple hundred.

      I highly doubt this guy can get 10,000 dollars.

    3. Re:seriously? by Artifakt · · Score: 1

      I'm not so inclined to doubt. Recently, I ran across an auction catalog, and it had some antique glass fronted carved wood display cases in it. The difference between a typical set of these, and the specific set that was once in Cornelius Vanderbuilt's study holding his yachting trophies, is just about that ratio (a couple of hundred to 10,000). (Or so I'd judge by the typical antique store price vs their minimum opening bid). Sometimes, you get situations where only the top 10% of something looks to be worth anything at all, the top 1% is worth a lot more than 10 times that, and the very tip of the scale is stratospheric, and this may be one of them.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    4. Re:seriously? by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

      Yes but Antiques and WoW accounts are very different.

      I can see a collector of fine arts being willing to dish out a pretty penny for a rare and authentic item.

      I have trouble seeing someone so avidly into World of Warcraft that they want to pay thousands of dollars for something that isn't as tangible as an antiquity.

      All that is required for anyone to achieve this same status is a fraction of the price, (maybe 300 dollars in game purchase and time cards) and enough spare time to do the same thing.

      And if you are an avid lover of World of warcraft, why wouldn't you go for the full experience?

  20. Re:Amanda Seyfried/Julianne Moore love scene? Chec by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

    Hey that's my macro.

    --
    These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
  21. What now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Alright, i beat WoW, now what do i do with my life?

  22. Hugging 11 players? by Lord+Lode · · Score: 1

    That sounds easy. Or do you have to solve 100 quests before being able to hug one player?

  23. I know someone... by purpledinoz · · Score: 5, Funny

    I know someone that finished reading the Internet.

    1. Re:I know someone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      George W. Bush?

    2. Re:I know someone... by smallfries · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, happens to me a few times a day. May I should add more feeds...

      --
      Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
    3. Re:I know someone... by Nerdfest · · Score: 1

      I beat the Internet a few months ago. The final boss is really tough.

    4. Re:I know someone... by Yvan256 · · Score: 1
    5. Re:I know someone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it was Chuck Norris, and he did it last night. While he was sleeping.

    6. Re:I know someone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know someone that finished reading the Internet.

      .. and you had to spoil it all by posting a comment?

      Sheesh.. Now he has to keep on reading.

    7. Re:I know someone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    8. Re:I know someone... by AtomicOrange · · Score: 1

      That's okay, Chuck Norris did it... twice

      --
      "What is there a tank on the boat? WHY IS THERE A TANK ON THE BOAT?!?" L4D2
    9. Re:I know someone... by gsmraxe · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it was made into a commercial

    10. Re:I know someone... by troll8901 · · Score: 1

      Is there a "beginning of the internet" page?

    11. Re:I know someone... by randomsearch · · Score: 1

      > I know someone that finished reading the Internet.

      Don't worry, I'm sure the blog coverage of his achievement will keep him busy for years to come.

    12. Re:I know someone... by Triela · · Score: 0

      "The end guy is hard" ..is what you were going for.

    13. Re:I know someone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me guess. The guy from the Dos Equis commercials?

      Stay thirsty, my friends.

    14. Re:I know someone... by MisterSquid · · Score: 1

      Everyone knows this is the last page.

      --
      blog
    15. Re:I know someone... by cain · · Score: 1

      ObBash:

      <BombScare> i beat the internet
      <BombScare> the end guy is hard

      http://bash.org/?4278

    16. Re:I know someone... by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 1

      You know Chuck Norris?! Does he smell as good in person as I imagine? .... mmmmmmm

    17. Re:I know someone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      me too, his name is chuck norris

    18. Re:I know someone... by gencha · · Score: 1

      You're on it.

    19. Re:I know someone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn, I wanted to be the first one to do that, but I'm still at 97% with the download.

    20. Re:I know someone... by mebrahim · · Score: 1

      His name is Google.

    21. Re:I know someone... by fireylord · · Score: 1

      www.aol.com i thought?

    22. Re:I know someone... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Of course there is - the man who created it!

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    23. Re:I know someone... by qwertyatwork · · Score: 1

      I finished it to. The last web page is http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm

    24. Re:I know someone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if you could read the entire internet, I doubt you could keep your sanity... the things eyes have seen...

  24. We've now identified... by adosch · · Score: 0, Troll

    We've now identified the first known, and clearly single, Mt. Dew-crazed, Oreo-gluttonous Taiwanese man who still lives in his parent's basement. Weather at 6.

  25. but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He ain't no computer hackah!

  26. Re:insert joke here by Korin43 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Maybe gay people are invincible? That could explain why people are afraid of them.

  27. Someday by TimeElf1 · · Score: 1

    He will look back and think it was the greatest day of his life. Or until the next MMORPG with a insane number of achievements comes out. Then beating that will be the greatest day of his life and so on and so forth ad nauseum.

    --
    Cannot find REALITY.SYS. Universe halted.
    1. Re:Someday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He should play EVE. Training every skill in the game (assuming they don't add more or go out of business) to level 5 would take over 30 years.

    2. Re:Someday by xaositects · · Score: 2, Insightful

      wow, that sounds oddly parallel to going to work every day. *sigh*

    3. Re:Someday by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      EvE is probably not his kind of game. Actually it's a very, very different kind of game, different from any other MMO I know. In EvE, it's rarely possible to become "the best". First, even "the best" has to rely on his Corp or Alliance. Alone, you can't hold territory or stage a raid on enemy stations.

      WoW like most MMOs is a game of personal heroism. Personal achivement. Personal accumulation of wealth and items. EvE is anything but that. I doubt that you could become a "hero" in EvE. People will probably not know you. They will know your corp, your alliance, and they will be wary because of this. But not because of you.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:Someday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, to some extent, there are some folks who used to be well known "back in the day".

      I don't know if this is the case anymore as I haven't played in years, but I remember the muttering about some pirate and his megathron, back when that ship was virtually unattainable by most people.

      I remember the first Titan - I don't remember who built it, but his name was mentioned frequently.

      I also know that there were less obvious heros. Through a few years, I was in a dozen different large corps and hundreds of fleet battles and I can tell you with some certainty that there were two or three fleet commanders who were far and above better than anyone else at it, and everyone knew it, even the enemies.

      With those guys, we would engage fleets twice, or sometimes four times our capability because we knew he was *that* good. And the enemies knew he was *that* good and would wait until he was asleep to conduct raids.

      EVE really does have the feel of a military unit if you are in a well structured PvP corp... The guys playing are mostly very intelligent, social and highly educated. There are no kids. There are no "comic book guy" obsessive nerds... that's what made it pretty cool.

      It's also what made me quit, because I was spending way too much time online. :-)

    5. Re:Someday by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Generally true, but I learned the hard way: You do NOT want to be a hero in EvE. Everyone will try to get a piece of you and want to brag that he killed you.

      I prefer to sit in the back and be the logistics genius behind a war. It's just as satisfying. Maybe not flashy, but it gives me a nice fuzzy warm feeling to know that I decided a few of the bigger wars singlehandedly without firing a single shot. ;)

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  28. Of course, a drood... by jhoegl · · Score: 1

    Nurf droods, NURF EM!

  29. Re:Of course [courses for horses of course] by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    If he was married to Tiger's wife, she'd politely give him the golf club and say, "enjoy yourself at the course, don't hurry back".

  30. Re:insert joke here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DEH, everything... you never played WoW eh ?

  31. Deaths by CrashNBrn · · Score: 1

    Total Deaths: 8567

    I suppose therin lies the difference between MMO and MUDS or a real RPG. You'd never reach that many deaths in most MUDS or RPGs: your character would wind up perma-dead.

    1. Re:Deaths by Microlith · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And that's one of many reasons WoW has a huge audience compared to most MUDS and RPGs: they don't punish the player horribly for dying.

      I think dying and losing a level would be enough of a setback to drive much of WoW's audience away. You'd end up with considerably more people who can actually play the game at the level cap, but for Blizzard it'd crimp revenues.

    2. Re:Deaths by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Works OK for Eve... You usually lose your gear when you get killed, and you lose a whack of SP if you forgot to update your clone.

    3. Re:Deaths by dingen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's also the reason why WoW isn't really a proper game: you can't lose. Everything you do is okay and nothing can go wrong. Sure you can be killed, but you just get the chance to try again or try something else without being set back at all.

      This makes WoW more of a social platform wrapped in a virtual world than an actual game.

      --
      Pretty good is actually pretty bad.
    4. Re:Deaths by amplt1337 · · Score: 1

      One of the design -- well, choices, let's not call it a flaw per se -- of WoW is that serial death is the primary feedback/learning mechanism.

      This is probably a consequence of the fact that the nigh-only way to interact with stuff in the game world is to kill it, and personally I find it quite tedious. But for WoW, unlike those other MUDs or D&D-style RPGs, it's "working as intended" for you to try a dungeon encounter a dozen times, dying each time as you learn what you're supposed to do and if you fail to make the execution perfect.

      Personally I found it rather tedious, even when I was playing the game.

      --
      Freedom isn't free; its price is the well-being of others.
    5. Re:Deaths by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      It's a different paradigm. In a "normal" RPG session, your wits are challenged, your ability to adapt to a given situation, evaluate your assets, your options and choose the correct one.

      WoW, like most MMOs, is about executing learned patterns. A fight is not about gauging your enemy and finding his strenghts and weaknesses. It's assumed you know them when you face him. Which is not so far fetched, considering that there's no way the makers of the MMO could keep you from finding out via external means (something that's fairly easy for your GM if he whips up the adventure himself, nobody but him knows how it runs and he will probably use it only once). So it is assumed you know exactly what's going to happen when you enter a combat, which skills or spells your opponent has at his disposal, how many opponents you will have to face, etc.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    6. Re:Deaths by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems like what you're arguing for isn't gaming, it's gambling: where, if you lose, you're out something that is actually worth something. But most games (to say nothing of MMORPGs) don't work like that. Pickup basketball? If you lose, no one dies. Chess? Checkers? Last I checked, a loss might forfeit some pride, but that's where it stops.

    7. Re:Deaths by amplt1337 · · Score: 1

      Absolutely -- which is a great deal of why MMOs reduce to spreadsheet-balancing games. Ho-hum. I played a healer, so at least I was mostly interacting with somewhat-less-predictable human players, but it still winds up feeling about as fun as the "balance your checkbook" minigame...

      --
      Freedom isn't free; its price is the well-being of others.
    8. Re:Deaths by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I like playing healers. Pet classes have one pet. I have (groupsize - 1).

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    9. Re:Deaths by dingen · · Score: 1

      If you win or lose a game of basketball, chess, checkers of whatever the game ends. That's quite a consequense, I would say.

      --
      Pretty good is actually pretty bad.
    10. Re:Deaths by amplt1337 · · Score: 1

      Yeah... you just give up a tiny bit of control over what the pets do :)

      --
      Freedom isn't free; its price is the well-being of others.
    11. Re:Deaths by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "No one dies" is the only consequence you can think of?

      I used to coach teenagers and I could tell the ones who were new to sports and competition (or had grown up super-coddled by PC mothers) and those who were experienced in competition.

      I'm not talking about skills or talent, but the fact that the ones who cried (yeah, they were like 15 years old) after losing a game, were usually the ones with helicopter mothers who made sure that NOTHING ever had any consequences and NOBODY ever had to suffer any failures EVER. They were the mothers who would bitch when their kid didn't get EXACTLY 12 minutes of playing time and would carry a stopwatch to make sure I was being FAIR.

      Since it was a traveling, competitive team and many of the kids planned to go on to play for years at a competitive level, I had ABSOLUTELY NO requirement to give them more time when they were dicking around in the middle of the game and not putting down effort.

      But they were raised that way... if you fail, you can just try again.... so they just failed most of the time, because it didn't matter.

      gambling my ass.

      Lets see... Things with consequences, where fucking up or being stupid has consequences... that's....... EVERYTHING YOU DO IN LIFE

      That's probably why WoW is so popular... Escape from the reality that in almost everything else, failure has consequences.

      Sounds pretty lame to me.

    12. Re:Deaths by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Considering how pathing works in WoW, that's not so much of a difference...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  32. I call BS by SomeJoel · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I quit WoW several months ago, but I know for a fact there are achievements for "Server First Max Skill XXX" where XXX is some tradeskill. I contend that is impossible for one player to become the server's first max skill leatherworker, blacksmith, alchemist, enchanter, and engineer (plus there's a few more) so there is no possible way he could attain "ALL" the achievements.

    --
    <Complete your profile by adding a signature!>
    1. Re:I call BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      great, now you've just ruined the guy's life and he'll keep playing until he gets all those achievements... so he'll play 'till the day he dies.

    2. Re:I call BS by maxume · · Score: 1

      DUUude! Total burn!

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    3. Re:I call BS by BobMcD · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think those are Feats of Skill, rather than Achievements.

    4. Re:I call BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Those are called "feats of strength" and don't count towards total achievements.

    5. Re:I call BS by SomeJoel · · Score: 1

      Even if "feats of strength" are different from normal achievements, I don't think you can be considered to have beaten the game if you don't have them all as well.

      In other words, there's stuff this guy hasn't done.

      --
      <Complete your profile by adding a signature!>
    6. Re:I call BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those are Feats of Strength (don't give you achievement points). He does have Realm Firsts for Leatherworking, First Aid, and Cooking, though (and first Druid and Tauren to hit 80 on the server).

      He *doesn't* have the Insane in the Membrane feat, though, which is one of the more grind-intensive feats to get.

    7. Re:I call BS by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Are you sure? It sounds quite like nothing WoW would implement. If WoW is about anything, it's making EVERYTHING available to EVERYONE, no matter if they can play or not. There's simply no way you could NOT get anything provided you invest time. There's no such thing as "elite only" equipment (and if there is, wait 'til the next expansion, then it's yours for the taking).

      Blizzard actually found that magical formula and I am honestly amazed that they had to invent it. Because it's the easy way to please everyone, from the most hardcore 24/7 raiders to the most leisure-casual gamer. Basically the creed is "everyone gets it, the hardcore players just get it first".

      So anything that's only available for the top elite is very un-WoW'y.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    8. Re:I call BS by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are also certain items that you can no longer acquire, quests no longer doable, and until the next expansion, the old Honour system ranks. Essentially if you've started playing after a certain time you can't do certain things.

      Likewise, in some world events, only 1 person can obtain the final quest reward (like opening the door to AQ).

      There are lots of restrictions to the game that make it impossible for various players to do everything.

      I think given the circumstances, this guy HAS done it all.

    9. Re:I call BS by whitedsepdivine · · Score: 0

      I dont play WoW; because frankly I have a life. But is it possible that it is 20 people playing one character, and they just have a schedule of when they have to play?

    10. Re:I call BS by EEBaum · · Score: 1

      Those are called "feats of strength" and don't count towards total achievements.

      I forget... do those come before or after the airing of grievances?

      --
      -- I prefer the term "karma escort."
    11. Re:I call BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe not relevant in the context of Wow, but my first thought was - can you create your own server?

    12. Re:I call BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Contend away. It's utterly, fantastically unlikely, but not impossible.

    13. Re:I call BS by pwfffff · · Score: 1

      Ummm, bullshit? They're adding even more elite crap with the next patch. I personally have two mounts you'll never be able to get if you don't already have them.

    14. Re:I call BS by jayme0227 · · Score: 1

      Nah, he just multiboxed it and did them all spread over his 16 accounts.

      --
      But then I realized the cable was blue, so I only gave it one star. I hate blue.
    15. Re:I call BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The impossible ones are "feats of strength" - they are basically achievements which don't give you any points. Within the game they aren't really counted for this sort of thing (it gives you a running total of the points-based ones).

      Some of them include "world first X", etc, which is even further out of the realm of possibility.

    16. Re:I call BS by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Granted, it's (currently) not possible to get certain mounts or pets anymore. Don't worry, eventually they will be available for somthing people can farm.

      Do you think that "elite" content will be "elite" forever? Think of all the raid gear you farmed when you were 60, all the hard to come by PvP gear that you could only have as the ruling warlord of the server. Yes, it was exclusively yours... 'til the next patch. Then it was either available for everyone (farm badges, buy it for them), it became trivially easy to get it (drop chances that changed from 1% to 100%), prerequisits that made it hard to obtain were dropped (Kara's Master's key comes to mind) or it was simply no longer interesting to get it (pretty much any top level gear of previous expansions, almost any purple lv70 gets the snot blown off by any green lv72 item).

      Face it. No matter what elite top-player-only gear you have, anyone will have not much later. If nothing else, with the next expansion.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    17. Re:I call BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those sort of achievements are "Feats of Strength". They're handled differently from the rest.

    18. Re:I call BS by tick_and_bash · · Score: 1

      The achievements you've listed are considered to be Feats of Strength. As such, they aren't part of the current 986 achievements in the game.

    19. Re:I call BS by pwfffff · · Score: 1

      Wow what an insightful and reasoned telling of the fucking future. Can I borrow your crystal ball? Pff why do I even ask, you knew I was going to!

      The shit you're talking about was not 'elite'. A bug mount is elite, it will not be put back in the game. The amani war bear is elite. It too is gone from the game. Same with the plagued and black protodrakes. When cataclysm is released, I'm sure they'll also remove the rusted and ironbound drakes, along with the new Icecrown drakes.

    20. Re:I call BS by pwfffff · · Score: 1

      Oh and I forgot to mention, my level 70 purples did in fact last me until 80, where I replaced them with more purples. I'm sorry you didn't have the elite gear that allowed this and had to replace your welfare epics with quest greens.

    21. Re:I call BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Server firsts are in the "Feats of Strength" category, and thusly, award no achievement points and don't go towards that 986 total that this guy completed. :)

      A "Feat of Strength" achievement is worth 0 points, because they are often too rare or simply not obtainable anymore (i.e., WoW's 4th Anniversay from 2008, owning an Amani War Bear, or level 60 Onyxia).

    22. Re:I call BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those are feats of strength and do not add to your achievement points. Blizzard figured people would complain that just because they weren't first, that the should still be able to max out their points.

    23. Re:I call BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those server firsts are Feats of Strength, not Achievements, and award no achievement points.

    24. Re:I call BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those are "Feats of Strength" not "Achievements".

    25. Re:I call BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The things you're thinking of are "feats of strength", things that are either near-impossible to get (such as server firsts you mentioned), or achievements you can't get anymore (killing old onyxia, etc). They're listed as kind of a subsidiary to achievements, and don't give achievement points.

    26. Re:I call BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those are "Feats of Strength", which get their own category.

    27. Re:I call BS by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

      Those arent achievements, theyre feats of strength and dont count for any achievement points. Theyre typically for things that can only be completed by one person (such as the realm firsts), or things that are only available for a limited time, acquiring toys from past holiday events, defeating bosses that are no longer available, that sort of thing. That said, it looks like he has 40 of those also.

      Cyno, Realm First Grand Master Engineer, Madoran.

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    28. Re:I call BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WoW differentiates between "Feats of Strength" which are non-repeatable achievements such as the ones you name, as well as deprecated achievements no longer possible to obtain, and "normal" achievements which any player could as least in principle obtain. The Feats are tabulated separately and do not contribute to the "total completed achievements" counter. The player in question indeed earned a great many Feats (lots of Realm First Kills, First Level 80 Druid, First Grand Master Leatherworker ) but as you point out many of the Feats are impossible even in principle for a given player. The armory page linked above has the full list.

    29. Re:I call BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Server first achievements go under Feats of Strength and don't contribute to achievement points.

    30. Re:I call BS by noslayer33 · · Score: 1

      Actually, the "Server First XXX" style achievements are in a separate category of Achievement (called "Feat of Strength"), which is not part of the regular count.

    31. Re:I call BS by Krahar · · Score: 1

      Those are not called achievements, those are called Feats of Strength. The achievements can all be done by all players. Many of the Feats of Strength can only be done by one player, and many have to have been done at some point in the past and so are no longer available, but that's not what this story is about.

    32. Re:I call BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i believe that's feat of strength, as they are not repeatable.

      so are PvP ranks, and other achievements that removed later.

      the idea is you can finish all achievement, given time and effort.

      it's a time sink.

      btw this has been mentioned on several WoW site last week. a bugged PvP achievement offset the BBKing that he didn't have. technically he's still 1 short.

    33. Re:I call BS by oneplus999 · · Score: 1

      I know for a fact there are achievements for "Server First Max Skill XXX" where XXX is some tradeskill. I contend that is impossible for one player to become the server's first max skill leatherworker, blacksmith, alchemist, enchanter, and engineer (plus there's a few more) so there is no possible way he could attain "ALL" the achievements.

      These are "Feats of Strength" and do not count towards the "Achievements" that they are talking about here.

    34. Re:I call BS by changedx · · Score: 0

      Server Firsts are Feats of Strength. From the MMO-Chamption article (linked from TFA):

      "The achievement count obviously doesn't take Feats of Strength into account because it's technically impossible to get all of them. (Well I guess you could race change to compete for the first level 80 undead/tauren/troll/orc/blood elf on the same character but I don't think you'll get all of them)"

      http://www.mmo-champion.com/news-2/player-gets-all-achievements-shadowed-unit-frames/

    35. Re:I call BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those are Feats of Strength, they do not earn you points and are not counted in total achievements.

    36. Re:I call BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Server First's aren't achievements in the strict sense of the ones that are counted in your Achievement summary, but rather "Feats of Strength". And depending on how you work the transfers, you could get a Server First for multiple classes and/or races to reach Level XX...

    37. Re:I call BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Feats of Strength are not part of the achievement count, largely because most of them are impossible to repeat.

    38. Re:I call BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He could have transferred the character a few times to new servers to get the tradeskill achievements.

    39. Re:I call BS by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Who do you think had to sink more time, you to get that superspecialawesome level 70 gear that lasted 'til 80, or someone who just leveled past 70 with green stuff and used whatever dropped? And what's that 70 gear you grinded for ages worth now? I mean, besides vendor food (unless you're enchanter, of course, then you can at least dis it).

      The same applies to that oh so mighty level 80 gear you have now come next expansion. Just to reiterate what I said before: Yes, you will have that equipment and no casual player will have it. For a while. With the next expansion, even the most casual player will pick up some green item that makes that purple sword you raided for weeks look like a toothpick.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    40. Re:I call BS by pwfffff · · Score: 1

      Congratulations, you've figured out how MMOs work!

      Now share with us your thoughts on how Monopoly isn't fun because each new game you start redistributes all the money you won.

      If they simply continued raising boss levels without providing a way to reset everyone's gear, then either you would max out your gear and have it scale with the boss levels (which would be no fun, since half the fun of RPGs like WoW is figuring out which gear is best), or new players would have such a long, ever-expanding chain of gear upgrades that nobody would want to play.

      It's called 'good game design'.

    41. Re:I call BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those are technically "Feats of Strength".

      -- hates himself for knowing that.

    42. Re:I call BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those are Feats of Strength, which are not included in the achievement total. Feats of Strength are usually things that are no longer attainable, so they are not tallied like other achievements. No points are awarded for Feats of Strength.

    43. Re:I call BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He does have 11 realm firsts, which is not too shabby, but they still don't count toward one's achievement points.

    44. Re:I call BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those are Feats of Strength and don't really count, seeing as a lot of them are mutually exclusive.

  33. Re:insert joke here by Stele · · Score: 1

    Heh - no. I prefer having a "real" life.

  34. Big question. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is he going to do now? Must have been his life, quite the void now.

    1. Re:Big question. by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      That was my first impression, too.

      “Gee, that would suck.”

      He might actually have to find something else to do, now. Luckily, there are plenty of alternatives that don’t include going outside.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    2. Re:Big question. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Start over with a new toon, of course. Duh.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:Big question. by Grygus · · Score: 1

      I'll assume you're not familiar with WoW. A lot of his achievements and Feats of Strengths are dated 10/23/2008, which is the day that achievements went live. That means he was a completionist well before there were any achievements guiding him. He's also a very good player in a very good guild - a lot of those achievements are unreachable if you're not at least decent in PvP, and his raiding achievements are impossible without a world-class guild. Getting these achievements was something to do and he was dedicated about it, but that's not all he was playing for.

  35. It never ends by diamondsw · · Score: 2, Funny

    Patch 3.3 comes out Tuesday.

    --
    I don't know what kind of crack I was on, but I suspect it was decaf.
    1. Re:It never ends by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Whew! Was already worried for that guy, he could have been forced to leave his basement!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  36. Probably invested a lot in this by TribesPlaying-iuSioN · · Score: 1

    Time, AND money. I don't understand the appeal of doing so many things over and over again. And now that he's beaten it, what is he to do? My guess, start over.

    1. Re:Probably invested a lot in this by Locke2005 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I don't understand the appeal of doing so many things over and over again.

      You've never masturbated, have you?

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    2. Re:Probably invested a lot in this by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, yeah, but afterwards I have something real to show!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:Probably invested a lot in this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow true /.er anyone else would have said "had sex"

    4. Re:Probably invested a lot in this by boudie2 · · Score: 0

      World Of Goo. That's another game.

    5. Re:Probably invested a lot in this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... but no one to show it to.

    6. Re:Probably invested a lot in this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow true /.er anyone else would have said "had sex"

      Not everybody has sex, but almost everybody masturbates. As for the people that don't, they should.

    7. Re:Probably invested a lot in this by peater · · Score: 1

      Only on /. does a reference to masturbation trump an equally plausible reference to having sex.

  37. LIES by devnull17 · · Score: 1

    The only way to beat World of Warcraft is to quit. Forever.

  38. Re:insert joke here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not sure you can infer homosexuality anymore from the term "gay". Much like it used to prevalently mean happy, I think its meaning has changed somewhat again and has come closer to the term "queer"... both could be taken as a homosexual reference, but could also just mean strange, unusual, or odd from the conventional viewpoint (queer:dictionary.com)

    I.e. Out of the box, You can't tether your iPhone to your laptop for internet access... that's gay! (may also mean dumb or absurd as well)

  39. Re:insert joke here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who says anything about homosexuality? S/he obviously said WoW is very happy in many ways!

  40. one account 2 gamer? by tedr2 · · Score: 0

    Could this guy be more then one guy sharing a single account? One in the eastern timezone and the other in west. While one is sleeping the other plays..

    1. Re:one account 2 gamer? by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      Taiwan has multiple time zones?

  41. You just... by tepples · · Score: 1

    The more appropriate question is "How do you win, but still lose?"

    You just Lost The Game

    1. Re:You just... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Goddammit.

    2. Re:You just... by FooAtWFU · · Score: 1

      The only way to win is not to play.

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    3. Re:You just... by Aqualung812 · · Score: 3, Informative

      You mean "The only winning move is not to play". Yeah, I'm being an ass.

      --
      Grammer Nazis - I mod you "troll" unless you actually add something on-topic. Yes, I know I have mispellings in my sig.
    4. Re:You just... by al.caughey · · Score: 1

      I lost the game

    5. Re:You just... by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Funny

      How about a nice game of chess?

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    6. Re:You just... by gfreeman · · Score: 1

      ... bastard ...

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
    7. Re:You just... by al.caughey · · Score: 1

      :-)

  42. Hes immortalized by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "How do you kill that which has no life?"

    South Park!

  43. Old News by UDGags · · Score: 1

    This was news last week (11/27). The link below is the original link.... "There isn't a lot of official news to report this week because of Thanksgiving but hopefully I should have enough things to keep you entertained for a while. Also, 3.3 menu should appear on the site tomorrow, you can stop mailing me about that. Player "beats the game" on Taiwanese Servers There was a few posts about it on the forums during the past week and I'll assume it's worth a front page news. On taiwanese servers, from the guild (TW-Wrathbringer) succesfully completed all achievements in the game and is the first player to reach 986/986 achievements completed on the armory. Technically he's still missing BB King (added with Patch 3.2.2) and his World Events achievements are down to 138/139 because of that, luckily a bug with an old PvP achievement gives him 165/164, that's how he got 986/986. The achievement count obviously doesn't take Feats of Strength into account because it's technically impossible to get all of them. (Well I guess you could race change to compete for the first level 80 undead/tauren/troll/orc/blood elf on the same character but I don't think you'll get all of them)" http://www.mmo-champion.com/news-2/player-gets-all-achievements-shadowed-unit-frames/

  44. Keanu Wonders by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 1

    Sure, but can he beat the world of breakfast sausages?

    --
    "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
  45. Now all we need.. by hollywench · · Score: 1

    One may hope that Nyhm will make a video about the guy. :D (Don't know who Nyhm is? Have a sample: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9KEK3wfn2hw Not the best quality but it's my favorite of all his machinimas.)

    1. Re:Now all we need.. by Wowlapalooza · · Score: 1

      Nyhm fanboys are total losers and should stay far away from the Horde trade channel of Alleria, unless they're masochists looking for a fresh round of verbal abuse from us "locals". IMO, there should be an achievement for successfully driving clueless noobs from a server.

    2. Re:Now all we need.. by hollywench · · Score: 1

      Ha. Hit a nerve, did I? I happen to like amusing machinima, regardless of who made it. FYI I'm so not a fanboy. Do you not know the meaning of the word "wench" ? I'm guessing not. Anyone with a tenth of a brain stays out of trade chat for either faction on Alleria. :p

    3. Re:Now all we need.. by Wowlapalooza · · Score: 1
      • There's nothing gender-specific about the term "fanboy", really. It's a state of mind or -- as some may prefer to characterize it -- a mental defect.
      • Yes, I know the meaning of the word "wench". A minor in English Lit takes cares of such details.
      • I have long since abandoned the practice of trying to divine a person's actual gender from their username/screenname.
      • Trade chat is usually sophmoric, inane, puerile, but it does have its moments, the occasional pearl amidst the swine. Kind of like Slashdot comments, really...
  46. Correction: He did not complete the game by tearmeapart · · Score: 1

    According to http://tw.wowarmory.com/character-achievements.xml?r=Wrathbringer&cn=%E5%B0%8F%E7%81%B0&gn=%E7%A5%9E%E6%A8%A3 , he still has one world event to attend. He also has not reached the top of the ladder for 2v2, 3v3, or 5v5 matches.

    However, he did finish 165 out of 164 player versus player matches. I am not sure how that works.

    Also, why are we presuming this person is a he?

    1. Re:Correction: He did not complete the game by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "...why are we presuming this person is a he?"

      Occam's razor?

    2. Re:Correction: He did not complete the game by Tacvek · · Score: 1

      The only achievement he does not have is for an upcoming event. The extra PvP achievement is due to tone of his achievements no longer being possible to earn, so it is not counted in the maximum number of possible achievements.

      --
      Stylish sheet to fix many problems in Slashdot's D3: https://gist.github.com/801524
  47. Tonight on Fox News by Lieutenant+Buddha · · Score: 5, Funny

    Taiwanese man inspires Christians around the world with his story of how he committed his life to abstinence.

    --
    "A casual stroll through the lunatic asylum shows that faith does not prove anything." ~Friedrich Nietzsche
    1. Re:Tonight on Fox News by Firemouth · · Score: 1

      Man I wish I had mod points to mod this up... thats hilarious.

    2. Re:Tonight on Fox News by Tchesko · · Score: 1

      This Taiwanese man can create some kind of religion to make all WoW players follow his lifestyle.

    3. Re:Tonight on Fox News by gent01 · · Score: 1

      That's funny!

  48. Re:insert joke here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What DOES homosexuality have to do with it?

    It sounds all sorts of happy to me!

  49. Thats nothing... by Ralz · · Score: 1

    I once beat world of woodcraft. Twice.

    --
    I am a leaf on the wind, watch how I soar.
  50. Re:insert joke here by morgauxo · · Score: 1

    He means he is happy. He has achieved something therefore he is happy. Right...?

  51. I fear the day by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ya know, MMOs have life cycles. They get born, they age, they eventually die. Eventually, the company running it will pull the plug. Be it because it's not profitable anymore to keep it running, or be it because they want to "convince" their players to come to their new MMO.

    Yes, there's EQ and UO (and Meridian for you Great Old Ones), but face it, they're little more than hollow shadows of what they used to be.

    Every MMO in its history met a terminal expansion. No, I don't mean the last one. I mean the one that kills the game. That convinces the players (at least those that still have a life) that it's just not worth it. DAoC managed it with Trials of Atlantis, SWG had its Jump to Lightspeed (aside of other troubles), eventually every maker of MMOs fucks something up and people leave.

    I fear the day this happens in WoW. It will happen. Certainly not for the next year or two, and I'm quite sure that two or three expansions will still be in the fold for WoW. But eventually, the game mechanics will break apart (they're creaking already when you look at the wiring under the board).

    And I quietly wonder what will happen to the WoW addicts that suddenly lose the last bits of meaning their life has...

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:I fear the day by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      They'll move on to the next thing. Where did all the EQ people go? They didn't all just magically lose interest.

      Wow is nice and all, but it's not the end-all be-all.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    2. Re:I fear the day by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm not so sure about that. EQ was a game that gamers played. They were used to shifting from one game to the next, EQ kept them playing longer than the average game because of the carrot-on-a-stick MMOs usually dangle before you. My guess is they knew that eventually this game will go just like every other game they played before did. Eventually.

      WoW is very different in the respect that it's played by many people who did not play any other game before, at least not to the same extent. I even know people who bought their first PC to play WoW. Exclusively. They never touched another PC game before. WoW is not a game that is played almost exclusively by "old school" gamers. There's also quite a few young gamers aged 14-25 that play WoW and do not remember any other (big) MMOs folding. WoW has always been there for as long as they play.

      I don't know how they will handle the sudden lack of WoW...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:I fear the day by Kjella · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure that's necessarily true. Yes, players age and eventually get bored but there's an everlasting supply of teenagers with too much free time. If you just manage to sustain enough recruitment and don't do any horrible releases you'll always have customers. Seriously, I think WoW know their market too well now to fail. More levels, more dungeons, more quests, more gear, more spells, more crafts, more of the same but honestly, people have been playing chess for a few thousand years. It's not like we have to invent everything new every five years.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    4. Re:I fear the day by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I think you underestimate teenagers' rejection of things they consider outdated.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:I fear the day by wanax · · Score: 1

      The hardcore EQ players who I know are split about evenly between WoW and Vanguard (which has more complex EQ-like gameplay).

    6. Re:I fear the day by S77IM · · Score: 1

      +1 Inadvertently Insightful

      People don't play MMOs for the games or the game mechanics. They play to hang out with their online friends. The game is just a lure to get you there, and then a shared activity to keep you playing. An MMO needs both aspects to be successful -- plenty of MMOs don't attract a critical mass of people (enough for you to find a good guild) and struggle and eventually die, and I think Second Life is a good example of what happens to an MMO without any "game" aspect.

      So yes, when WoW's gameplay side dries up, those players will move somewhere else. And many of them will move in groups, keeping together with their old guilds. I think the first company to realize this -- and implement pan-game guilds, so that you can start a new game without leaving your friends behind -- will do extremely well. (NCSoft's strategy has tried to exploit this turnover, but completely dropped the ball on maintaining the social aspect of MMOs.)

        -- 77IM

      --
      Student: Is it true that the foundation of the universe is paradox?
      Master: Well, yes and no.
    7. Re:I fear the day by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 1

      And I quietly wonder what will happen to the WoW addicts that suddenly lose the last bits of meaning their life has...

      They will join the Church of Scientology?

    8. Re:I fear the day by harl · · Score: 1

      Just need to correct two things.

      UO does not have the player base it used to but it's no "hollow shadow of what they used[sic] to be" The game is better than ever with more to do than ever. They just, 2-3 months ago, released a new expansion with a new race and new landmass.

      As for SWG you need to check your facts. Jump to Lightspeed didn't kill it. It worst it was a meh expansion. The NGE killed it. That's not a subject for debate. That's the words of the people who ran the game. You can't change the entire game overnight and expect players to stay. They literally shutdown SWG and launched SWG 2.0.

      I can't speak for the other games.

      --
      I find being offended by me offensive.
    9. Re:I fear the day by m.ducharme · · Score: 1

      I don't know how they will handle the sudden lack of WoW...

      Most of them will never see a sudden lack of WoW. They'll leave first, causing the revenue to dry up. As long as there are sufficient numbers of them (and there are new ones every year) WoW will remain profitable. You've conflated cause and effect.

      --
      Rule of Slashdot #0: You and people like you are not representative of the larger population. - A.C.
    10. Re:I fear the day by jpmorgan · · Score: 1

      Already happening. It's not an event that drives people away en masse... WoW's done something that no other MMO has done: it's become mature and hit saturation. It's entered an attrition phase... players slip away as they always have, but the influx of new players has drawn down to a trickle.

      It's still got years of life left in it, but the end is in sight.

    11. Re:I fear the day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I quietly wonder what will happen to the WoW addicts that suddenly lose the last bits of meaning their life has...

      Diablo 4 until WoW 2 is out. Blizzard cares deeply about its playerbase and will be sure to take good care of them.

    12. Re:I fear the day by VGPowerlord · · Score: 1

      Blizzard is attempting to move WoW from the Saturation and decline stage back to the Mature stage by completely redoing all the game's original (pre-expansion) content for the next expansion's release. This content replaces the original content for everyone, even if they don't buy the Cataclysm expansion.

      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
    13. Re:I fear the day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i remember when it happened to football.

    14. Re:I fear the day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, Jump to Lightspeed was great.

      It was when SOE following a major play system overhaul (the "NGE" or whatever) with a complete play system re-write -- one that got a few things right that should have been that way from the beginning, but that completely obliterated several of many people's favorite things about the game -- that killed SWG.

      It was as if they'd released a crappy sequel to the game, while preventing anyone from playing the previous version. Total fail.

    15. Re:I fear the day by oneplus999 · · Score: 1

      Ya know, MMOs have life cycles. They get born, they age, they eventually die. ...I'm quite sure that two or three expansions will still be in the fold for WoW. But eventually, the game mechanics will break apart (they're creaking already when you look at the wiring under the board).

      And I quietly wonder what will happen to the WoW addicts that suddenly lose the last bits of meaning their life has...

      Do you even play WoW? Game mechanics are better than they have ever been. PvP isn't at its peak, but thats a minority of the players. I think it's pretty clear that generalizations taken from other MMOs simply do not apply to this game.

    16. Re:I fear the day by B4D+BE4T · · Score: 1

      Where did all the EQ people go? They didn't all just magically lose interest.

      I did. After spending countless hours playing UO and then EQ, I have completely lost interest in MMOs. I have yet to play any of the MMOs that were released after EQ.

    17. Re:I fear the day by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I took that into account. And I'm not talking about the "average" WoW player. I know some people who play WoW. They still have a life. They go to raids once in a while, maybe once a week, unless something more interesting comes along. And most of the people that play WoW fall into this group.

      What I fear for are the "hardcore" players. The ones that sunk their life into WoW, that raid 3-4 times a week and would rather miss their mother's furneral than the all important raid. Contrary to stereotypes and what hysteric media reports of teens that died during playing WoW want us to believe, this isn't the average player. They are a minority.

      These people will not leave. Ever. They invested way too much time, they invested their life into this game. But they are most likely not enough to pay for expansion after expansion, maybe not even enough to keep the game running.

      The first group will eventually up and leave. Either because they had enough, or because they found that they don't have the time anymore, or maybe they just want to take a break because there's nothing going on they can or want to be part of.

      They're not the ones that I worry about.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    18. Re:I fear the day by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Hmm... they're used to repetitive tasks and not getting anything meaningful for slaving away 16 hours a day...

      Perfect material.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    19. Re:I fear the day by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, I play WoW.

      Better than it's ever been.... well, it sure is easier than it's ever been. It's now virtually impossible for a tank to lose aggro, no matter how much damage a DD lays on a mob (unless he's stupid, of course). CC is nonexistant because it's just way faster to mass bomb enemies, tanks can handle the damage and healers can easily compensate it. Skills that used to be "ohshit" buttons became part of the rotation due to decreased cooldowns.

      What I actually meant was the bonus you get from gear. It's getting out of hand and starts to break apart the game. Allow me to illustrate. What is equipment? Basically it's additional levels. When you level up, HP, attirbutes, mana, chance to hit/parry/dodge/block etc. increase. The same applies to items. They give you HP, mana, and so on. We are already at the point where stats from equipment outmatch "raw" stats by some magnitude. This in turn means that a level 70 player with top level gear will be "better" than a level 75 player with ordinary garb. This may not seem important until you take the all important aspect into consideration, which WoW managed so far: New players. Other MMOs fell apart when it became impossible for new players to catch up. They joined, saw that they will never compete with the old players and quit. Since there's also a steady loss of old players, those MMOs eventually withered away.

      Now, WoW gets new players still and they still grow to level 80. It's trivially easy in WoW to reach max level. WoW did away with the necessity many earlier MMOs had, that you HAD to group at some point to progress. Some will level quicker, some will take more time, but everyone will hit maxlevel provided he invests time. Until they get to 80, it is also not really a big problem for them to find a group. If they have inferior equipment, they will simply go into the instance a few levels later and still be useful.

      That changes completely at maxlevel. You can't just level a little further. Now, these people would have to go into "normal" instances because they cannot survive in "heroics". And here's the catch 22: The old players have the equipment (and the group/guild, if they don't) that they can often skip the normal instances altogether. They got to maxlevel in the pre-expansion times and have all the raid equipment that was available in the old times. This is now impossible for the new players, because getting a group for for a level 70 is even more impossible than getting one for a non-heroic instance.

      But nobody is going to take them along in a heroic instance if they're a liability rather than an asset.

      This is the problem WoW will have to solve now. I'm not talking about rotations (which ain't that big a deal anymore... like I said, the game's been made easier and easier, not that it was hard in the first place). I'm talking about the game mechanics revolving around items and the effects they have on player's ability to find groups.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    20. Re:I fear the day by Dracolytch · · Score: 1

      US productivity jumps 20%, divorce rates go down by 50%, and we all find out what "that smell" is.

      ~D

      --
      This sig has been enciphered with a one-time pad. It could say almost anything.
    21. Re:I fear the day by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I know Van. Actually played it for a while when it came out. It is much more complex than WoW and would actually be much more my kind of game... But it was just a few things not. First, it was not what was promised. It was not "independent leveling" of combat, trade or diplomacy, one of the key reasons why I wanted to take a look. Finally a game where I can JUST be a crafter. As usual, it boiled down to having to fight to get the others accomplished, if only to travel to other locations and get the resources, which pretty much requires you to fight the mobs around them. And, as usual, what you craft ain't worth crap, what you could craft from the rarest or rare resources is blown out of the water by some uncommon (not even rare) drop from a wandering mob. Very disappointing.

      Add the various bugs and the insane lag between zones (yeah, yeah, there are no zones... there are just invisible borders that keep you waiting for 10 seconds 'til the zone is loaded. Did I mention that you might be in combat when that happens?), and you're back at your average fantasy MMO. Great promise, unsatisfying delivery.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    22. Re:I fear the day by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Chinese productivity jumps 50%, don't forget that!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    23. Re:I fear the day by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      I don't know about that. Counter-Strike 1.6 came out when I was 16 or 17. We - my group of friends - had been playing Counter-Strike since version .8, at least; maybe longer. It'd been at least two years of not-exclusive-but-certainly-predominant gameplay.

      Flash forward to just a couple years ago; we're all adults, but we still prefer CS 1.5 or earlier to the 1.6, or 2.0 variants - the gameplay was/is better. Even as teenagers, we didn't upgrade our game servers and kept playing the older versions, because they were better.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    24. Re:I fear the day by oneplus999 · · Score: 1

      Apparently giant wall of text = insightful? You don't know what you are talking about. Any fresh 80 can get geared up in a matter of weeks to be running the current raid content, thanks to the way Blizzard uses emblems. How do I know? Cause I've done it. Got my druid to 80 at the beginning of this patch, and now I'm the best geared healer in my guild, and I it was almost entirely by pugging heroics. O well, news is a day old now so I guess no one cares.

    25. Re:I fear the day by oneplus999 · · Score: 1

      it was almost entirely by pugging heroics

      That is, until I could run Toc10, which is also puggable.

    26. Re:I fear the day by iamapizza · · Score: 1

      Got stood up last night, then?

      --
      Always proofread carefully to see if you any words out.
    27. Re:I fear the day by Anonymous+Hermit · · Score: 1

      For the people who keep playing daily for years, yes. But there are plenty of people who play an MMO until they have gotten as far as they can without having to follow a schedule to get further.

      I played WoW for the game, and I especially liked the economy aspect of it, but I only really enjoyed WoW until I couldn't get much further without having to spend hours studying every dungeon and then courting a decent guild. WoW has little to offer the gamers who don't want to make commitments to a guild, yet want to keep playing instead of spending ages finding the final player the group need in order to finish an instance once some random guy drops out, then spending even more time finding another player again when someone else has to leave a while later. Also, spending 10 minutes running back to an instance after a wipe is not my idea of a good time, and it didn't really increase my satisfaction when I finally finished the instance, it just motivated me to study instances in advance, which really killed the suspense and immersion I felt when I was in an area I knew nothing about.

      However, the reason I finally stopped playing was because my ignore list maxed out during the Dirge scourge. (Dirge is a very rare but underpowered weapon that trolls spammed the trade channel with a link to in order to piss people off. Whenever someone linked it, ten more people would follow suit, filling the trade channel with [Dirge] lines, so you couldn't read the legitimate trade banter.) If there are a thousand trolls on my shard, I'd like the ability to ignore them permanently whenever they make themselves known, thank you very much. Since Blizzard chose to tolerate disruptive retards who were obviously acting out of order, they didn't really supply the game experience the ToS claimed to offer.

      In my opinion Blizzard lost profit in the long run by not doing enough to save face when a small minority repeatedly disrespected them. If I'm in a pub plagued by unruly drunks being a nuisance, I leave and go to one that does ban disorderly patrons. Really, a couple of thousand bans and a few notices reminding people of the ToS would have stopped the spam that some really immature "rebels" thought was hysterically funny since they could break rules and annoy people without any consequences whatsoever. They choose to keep the idiots around, so they lose the people who do expect disruptive players to get banned.

    28. Re:I fear the day by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Ouch. I'm not old, I'm ... older!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  52. Over by boxxa · · Score: 1

    I could not imagine dedicating that much time into a game and then having any reason to wake up the next morning after you beat it.

    --
    Bryan
  53. Re:insert joke here by Inda · · Score: 1

    When in the last 5 year has gay meant homosexual?

    --
    This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
  54. Hate to spoil the fun by thelonious · · Score: 0

    Guess what, mr. winner dude, there's an expansion coming! Bwahahahahah, you haven't won. The only way to win is for your bank account to be empty and Blizzard to be high diving into a pile of gold coins!!!

    Besides, he's probably a bot

  55. A Great Acheivement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Congraturation! You Sucsess!

  56. So, how is the weather in denial? by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 2, Funny

    Interesting that in your rant to show how much of a non-loser you are, you list playing on Facebook. Think you kinda shot yourself in the foot there buddy.

    Losers come oi all forms, and defending on a loser site that you are not a loser... well... welcome brother.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:So, how is the weather in denial? by pwfffff · · Score: 1

      Yeah, when I grow up I want to run departments and fish! That sounds way more exciting that finding 24 like-minded people and enjoying my time with them while I kill virtual dragons.

      Anyone who says 'get a life' here better be Steve fucking Jobs.

  57. ROLE MODEL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nuff said

  58. for what its worth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    whose to say its one person and not 6 or 8 12 year olds paid 20 cents an hour to work in shifts around the clock. all in a mad devious plan to be the first to win

  59. What's He Win, Johnny? by flyneye · · Score: 1

    Our big winner will receive a lifetime supply of turtlewax, flight and hotel accomodations to lovely downtown Burbank and the grand prize; a DATE WITH ELVIS!

    --
    *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    1. Re:What's He Win, Johnny? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      But ... but Elvis is dead! How do you kill that which has no life?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:What's He Win, Johnny? by flyneye · · Score: 1

      Hey! There are lonely desperate single gamers in China who would love a date with Elvis, dead or not. He has enough zombie hit points in him to cross the D/FW runway and still be the king.
      Died on the toilet, buried in the back yard like 'ol yeller, and now to be seen at Burbanks finer dining establishments with OUR WINNER!

       

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
  60. Re:insert joke here by bkr1_2k · · Score: 1

    All the time... new meanings doesn't imply a complete loss of the old ones. Obviously someone asking the question about homosexuality implies the word clearly still means that.

    Gay has been the default term for homosexual for at least 20 years and that hasn't changed in the last 5 just because douchebags trying to insult people have used the term for a homosexual as an insult.

    --
    "Growing old is inevitable; growing up is optional."
  61. I can bet U he is a Chick Magnet! by Electronicdeath · · Score: 1

    Can you imagine all the number of chicks that you can get with this achievement? mmm let me think zero Are you sure the Taiwanese is not a robot? I know that there are a lot of robots that look like humans in Taiwan.

  62. Damn It by tweekie · · Score: 1

    The first time I read this I thought 'Now my brother can finally get a job and get off WoW servers' ... then I re-read it and noticed they said the guy was taiwanese.

  63. Re:insert joke here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Before that, gay meant happy and care-free. And that hasn't changed in the last 20 years just because douchebags try to use it as a term for a homosexual.

  64. Beats it by PeeShootr · · Score: 1

    I'm sure that's not all he "beats"

  65. shortly there after... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wife "Beats" Man

  66. Damn! by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    The hot chicks must be crawling all over this guy! Why didn't I think of doing every possible time waster in WoW (at least until the next update) as a way to meet girls? Hey Blizzard -- time to release another expansion pack!

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  67. Re:insert joke here by srussia · · Score: 5, Funny

    What does homosexuality have to do with it?

    Nothing at all. But when Taco said "No wireless. Less space than a nomad. Lame." it had nothing to do with being crippled. Oh wait...

    --
    Set your phasers on "funky"!
  68. Tauren Druid... by Alascom · · Score: 1

    I put on my Druid robe and hat...

  69. The only way to win by Drummergeek0 · · Score: 1

    is not to play.

    --
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
    1. Re:The only way to win by conureman · · Score: 1

      Actually, I don't exactly disagree with you, and I'm far from pissed off, but your post is, in fact, flamebait.

      --
      The cost of that cleanup, of course, will be borne by taxpayers, not industry.
  70. Re:insert joke here by zmollusc · · Score: 3, Funny

    No, they can't be, I see them all the time.

    --
    They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
  71. Screen-shot or it didn't happen! by realsilly · · Score: 1, Informative

    Every WoW player knows this. Screen-shot or it didn't happen. How many hours played? What's his gold amount collected? How many pets did he get? How many mounts? How many times did he die? Wouldn't getting every achievement mean he'd have had to change professions a few times over?

    --
    Life takes interesting turns, but the most interest is when you're off the beaten path.
    1. Re:Screen-shot or it didn't happen! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It helps to read - but obviously u are not new here.

      http://tw.wowarmory.com/character-sheet.xml?r=Wrathbringer&cn=%E5%B0%8F%E7%81%B0&gn=%E7%A5%9E%E6%A8%A3

    2. Re:Screen-shot or it didn't happen! by realsilly · · Score: 1

      Not allowed to go to those sites from work. Besides, the heading was an attempt at WoW humor.

      --
      Life takes interesting turns, but the most interest is when you're off the beaten path.
  72. World of Reality by johnshirley · · Score: 1

    Now that he's finished the game, he'll have to start playing World of Reality -- and start meeting and interacting with some actual people. There are far more quests and achievements out here to earn.

    1. Re:World of Reality by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I tried it for a while. It's an even worse treadmill than WoW ever was. The graphics are superb, but let's face it, the eye candy wears off pretty quickly and then you're left with a game where all the good gear is only available to the elite players who won't let you join their alliance.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  73. Re:insert joke here by Shakrai · · Score: 0, Redundant

    invincible != invisible

    --
    I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
    We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  74. "Beating" WoW by CaseM · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm quite sure that WoW isn't the only thing he's beating regularly.

    1. Re:"Beating" WoW by pbjones · · Score: 1

      how would he find the time? one hand on mouse, the other on the keyboard...

      --
      There was an unknown error in the submission.
  75. seriously by AP31R0N · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What value is gained for reading a book, watching a movie, listening to music or mounting a pretty painting on the wall? It's all entertainment. If he enjoyed doing it, that's all the gain *he* needs. Entertainment is an end unto itself. Fun and beauty ARE utility.

    i'd rather do the other things i listed above than play WoW, but in the end, it's all fun and games.

    --
    Utilizing the synergization of benchmark e-solutions to pre-workaround action items!
    1. Re:seriously by greyhueofdoubt · · Score: 1

      You're right, reading a book is fine. Reading for 100+ hours/week, missing days of work, losing touch with you family, etc: That is a sign that something is not ok.

      I agree that it's silly to make fun of WoW players when my own hobbies probably seem trivial to others. However, this kind of relativism becomes absurd as the WoW player gives up most parts of their life that make it what we classify as a normal life.

      You could say, "Hey, if someone wants to wash their hands all day, that's their business. It's ok to have weird hobbies." But I would say we have a medical term for that: OCD.

      -b

      --
      No offense, but I've stopped responding to AC's.
    2. Re:seriously by HoboMaster · · Score: 1

      What value is gained for reading a book, watching a movie, listening to music or mounting a pretty painting on the wall? It's all entertainment. If he enjoyed doing it, that's all the gain *he* needs. Entertainment is an end unto itself. Fun and beauty ARE utility.

      i'd rather do the other things i listed above than play WoW, but in the end, it's all fun and games.

      When you do those others, you are culturing yourself and learning about the world and other people. All of those things (I would argue that this is a lot less true of movies than the others, though all the film majors out there would disagree) are highly educational and help you better yourself as a person. This is not true of video games, ESPECIALLY MMO time sinks. Saying playing WoW is comparable to reading is sad and says a lot about our society.

      --
      Remember kids, tin foil doesn't work, so use LeadHat.
    3. Re:seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What value is gained for reading a book, watching a movie, listening to music

      You're not reading the right books, watching the right movies or listening to the right music. Most of them worth anything can help expand your mind and make you think different. But then again, with the shit spewed out by the movie and record industry I can hardly blame ya...

    4. Re:seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there is a line to be drawn though when entertainment becomes addiction. additionally many of the things you listed have inherent cultural redeeming value. being well read or having an intimate knowledge of a certain genre of music or film has social relevance. at this point in time, gaming does not have these positives associated with it, its banal and base and even in its most 'glorious' is barely low-art.

      now all that sounds very pretentious, and i'm not saying that this is how this AC feels, but society dictates values regardless of how valuable you think it is

    5. Re:seriously by AP31R0N · · Score: 1

      People can take anything too far. Even trying to become "cultured" as the snob in the other reply to me describes, can go too far.

      Not sure that anyone's life is normal by any objective standard. Even within one culture. i think i would slash my wrists if i realized i had spent that much time and money on a game. Not sure i want to tell him how he should entertain himself or how bad he should feel about it.

      How many hours per week was this guy playing? Was it really 100+? If he achieved this in 100+ hours per month, would we look down at him less?

      --
      Utilizing the synergization of benchmark e-solutions to pre-workaround action items!
    6. Re:seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...but in the end, it's all fun and games.

      Well, until somebody pokes his eye out.

    7. Re:seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What value is gained for reading a book, watching a movie, listening to music or mounting a pretty painting on the wall? It's all entertainment. If he enjoyed doing it, that's all the gain *he* needs. Entertainment is an end unto itself. Fun and beauty ARE utility.

      I was following you with "mounting a pretty," but lost you with "painting on the wall."

  76. Re:Amanda Seyfried/Julianne Moore love scene? Chec by iluvcapra · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's sort of pathetic what passes for a lesbian love scene post title these days. What ever happened to Natalie, petrified, hot grits etc... ?

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
  77. Re:insert joke here by nine-times · · Score: 4, Funny

    Me too. (by "real life", you mean posting on Slashdot, right?)

  78. Re:insert joke here by mitashki · · Score: 0

    Not speaking of the evolution of the term 'douchebag'

    --
    "When all you have is a hammer, everything starts looking like a nail."
  79. Winning WoW is easy by selven · · Score: 1

    I heard that if you kill a warlock with a resto druid (kill, not survive forever), the credits start rolling.

  80. Online-gaming attention timespan by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

    With regards to a different multiplayer online game:
    I have an attention span of several months for any particular game, but this online game I'm talking about is going way beyond even that.

    I can easily switch from, say, Civilization II to Starcraft after a few months, once the first game has worn thin. (I often find myself coming back to a particular game after I switched to something else for awhile) It's harder to disengage from an intricate online environment.
    Just walking out, perhaps with middle fingers flying, sucks after all the time you've spent there.
    And even if your teammates aren't strict assholes about activity "requirements", you still don't want to disappear on them

    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  81. The Anti-Godwin's law by garyebickford · · Score: 1

    have you ever kissed a girl?

    This question came up in something else on here a couple of days ago. I think it's a worthwhile candidate for meme-ification.

    So, I hereby propose the Anti-Godwin's law: In any online conversation, if someone posts a long, excrutiatingly detailed diatribe about an esoteric detail of no interest to the parties, and minimallly relevant to the topic, the first party to respond with "Have you ever kissed a girl?" instantly wins the argument, and the topic is closed.

    Exception: if many others disagree regarding relevance, the citing party loses by popular acclamation. :)

    --
    It's easier to be a result of the past, but more fun to be a cause of the future! http://www.spacefinancegroup.com/
    1. Re:The Anti-Godwin's law by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      Further exception: if the original long, esoteric poster has in fact kissed a girl (or a member of the appropriate sex should the poster be female and/or homosexual), the discussion continues. If the poster has a regular sex life, they win the thread for maintaining a regular sex life while still accruing huge amounts of esoteric knowledge.

    2. Re:The Anti-Godwin's law by MaerD · · Score: 2, Funny

      Have you ever kissed a girl?

      --
      I put on my robe and wizard hat..
    3. Re:The Anti-Godwin's law by garyebickford · · Score: 1

      Hahaha - yes!! Married a couple of them. And I got kissed by a girl two weeks ago - twice! :)

      --
      It's easier to be a result of the past, but more fun to be a cause of the future! http://www.spacefinancegroup.com/
    4. Re:The Anti-Godwin's law by BitterAndDrunk · · Score: 3, Informative

      Married a couple of them.

      You're doing it wrong.

      --
      You better watch out, there may be dogs about . . .
    5. Re:The Anti-Godwin's law by Petrushka · · Score: 1

      I think your signature may undermine your attempt to use this new rule.

    6. Re:The Anti-Godwin's law by Tacvek · · Score: 1

      Married a couple of them.

      You're doing it wrong.

      Legally perhaps, but if I could find a female couple who would marry me, I''d ignore the law too. Two for the price of one, eh?

      --
      Stylish sheet to fix many problems in Slashdot's D3: https://gist.github.com/801524
    7. Re:The Anti-Godwin's law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't suppose you're going to cast Level 38 Kiss on whichever poor girl you meet......?

  82. I beat WoW by Riddler+Sensei · · Score: 1

    You know, I kind of figure I got WoW beat myself. I'm in a top 100 US guild and we play...two nights a week. We go in, win, and leave. If you can't make a certain night because of some sort of pressing engagement, or you just have too much work to do that night, you don't get kicked (just please let us know).

    No destructive, or addictive, behavior here.

  83. He used bugs by ub3r+n3u7r4l1st · · Score: 1

    IF you read TFA correctly, one of his achievement is recorded due to a glitch.

  84. meh by castironpigeon · · Score: 1

    Fine, he beat the game. Now I wanna see a speed run.

    --
    mmmm...forbidden donut
  85. It aint kickin' my ass too badly... by conureman · · Score: 1

    It's a money issue for me. I never played it, but I supply the infrastructure. I'll never win but the kid's pretty happy with the single HD 4850 he's got now.
    I have the kid's old N64 and the Pod Racer cartridge. It's pretty robust, and possibly the only game I'll ever need. Besides planting my trees and perfecting my pizza recipe, I haven't got any noble aspirations myself. Balance or single-mindedness is a personal choice, I bow before Little Gray's achievement.

    --
    The cost of that cleanup, of course, will be borne by taxpayers, not industry.
  86. Unwinning by Riddler+Sensei · · Score: 1

    Of course, the rumor mill is that Icecrown Citadel will come out next week, thus effectively "unwinning" the game for this man.

  87. I've been truly inspired! by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    I'm going to go out and design a MMORPT named "Meat", just so I can someday read the slashdot headline Man Beats Meat!

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  88. Just goes to show you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Asians are still better at video games than Americans.

  89. Player! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He must be a devil with the ladies!

  90. Maybe he's not a loser after all by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    For this, he deserves a guest spot on The Guild. If he can spin this into a chance to meet Felicia Day in person, then he can be a winner, not just someone famous for having no life.

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  91. Re:insert joke here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Absolutely nothing - unless you are so politically correct and uptight that you don't realize there are multiple definitions for that word, including slang ones, that do not mean homosexual.


    Also, you asking that question was pretty gay.

  92. The stig? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nt

  93. A better title by Dirtside · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think a better title for this article would be "World of Warcraft Beats Man".

    --
    "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  94. I beat it too by WingedEarth · · Score: 1

    I beat World of Warcraft when I cancelled my WoW account.

  95. You win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have won the game. Delete your character now? (Y/n)

  96. Re:insert joke here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Woooosh!

  97. He missed one by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    He hasn't been a member of the Care Bear guild on Mok'Nathal.

    That achievement is rarely found, and you'd think someone who /hug his enemies in combat and /love all the furry creatures would have tried for that one.

    (Yes, I'm Kehrbehr)

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  98. hmm by DigitalSorceress · · Score: 1

    I thought you only won WoW if you beat the Lich King in nothing but a loin cloth and an off-hand fish.

    Who'd have thunk it?

    --

    The Digital Sorceress
  99. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  100. Re:I fear the day, Too Big TO Fail by kenp2002 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Like American Auto, it's too big to fail. Very few MMOs to date have folded. AC2 and a few smaller ones but EQ is still strolling along. WoW, like EQ isn't a game, it is a setting, a mythology if you would.

    WoW 1.0 may some day go offline but WoW 2.0 will be there. Nothing is preventing Verant from taking EQ1, rebuilding the game engine from the ground up and relaunching Everquest to a new generation. That is why certain toys are only advertised heavily every 21-25 years. Introduce it to a new generation. A 'reboot' if you would.

    EQ is getting ready for a reboot I think, not a sequel, a reboot. Same for UO.

    I consider MMOs not a new gaming addiction but mearly the 21st century version of fraternal societies. Rather then heading out for lodge night, people head out and raid. MMOs have simply filled the social gap that freemasons, knight of columbus, rotary club, etc. filled for 1950s. In short people 'hang out' in MMOs.

    --
    -=[ Who Is John Galt? ]=-
  101. Re:insert joke here by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry, guy, but you're not my friend, buddy.

    Gay hasn't meant homosexual for at least a decade.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  102. Re:insert joke here by Stele · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    That's just what I do to pass the time between working, playing with my kids, traveling, drinking, flying airplanes, hosting dinner parties, etc.

    Posting occasionally on /. doesn't HAVE to be an indicator of no life. It just usually does.

  103. Re:insert joke here by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
    "[gay/queer].. both could be taken as a homosexual reference, but could also just mean strange, unusual, or odd from the conventional viewpoint "

    Well, I think you're repeating yourself here, I'd say most people in the past, and frankly, probably even a majority of people today consider homosexuality to be "strange, unusual, or odd from the conventional", hence using the term 'gay' to not only mean homosexual, but, also as a bit of a derogatory term to describe something, meaning it to be strange, odd or bad.

    I'd dare say the work 'queer' has double meanings for much of the same reasons.

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  104. Now he can move out of his mother's basement! by KingTank · · Score: 1

    Sorry, but nobody had made that wisecrack yet. It is obligatory.

  105. Make love, not warcraft by Gooner_14 · · Score: 1

    I recommend a south park episode called: Make Love, Not Warcraft.

  106. Re:I fear the day, Too Big TO Fail by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Well, there is EQ2. I don't know if it can be called a "fail", but it was anything but the huge success it should have been according to the logic you present here. EQ was a different generation of MMOs, and, bluntly, I think its success is owed largely to the fact that it was the first (well, the first that got big enough to attract more than a handful followers). EQ was hard and unforgiving. I doubt that it would attract too many people today.

    When you look at EQ through the eyes of someone who has been playing WoW, you'd wonder why you could even possible consider playing it. It's confusing and difficult for someone who is used to a game like WoW where you get used to being led through pretty much any obstacle you might face. It's hard and unforgiving and you might lose your gear. You're highly dependent on the aid of others and you better have a good guild that doesn't mind staging a rescue party for your gear. People used to WoW would probably shake their head and wonder how you could possibly enjoy that.

    Maybe some day someone will come along and present us a new kind of MMO where we will be looking at WoW and wonder how we could stomach the time sinks and tedium, the boring repetitiveness, etc.

    So I doubt that a relaunch is the key to success. The formula does not work out anymore, it will not attract any players away from their current game.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  107. New record awaits by cereda · · Score: 1

    Great. I bet he will play again and try to break his own record.

  108. Re:insert joke here by cayenne8 · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    "I'm sorry, guy, but you're not my friend, buddy.

    Gay hasn't meant homosexual for at least a decade."

    Wow, where do you live where this isn't true?

    I've always heard the word gay used as a direct synonym for homosexual (usually male and lesbian for females).

    Heck, you hear it all the time on the news and read about it in major publications...the "Gay Agenda" this...etc. Isn't there a group for homosexuals specifically with the words Gay and Lesbian in their name/acronym?

    Heck, I'd say it is the MOST common term I've heard used for homo men.

    Now, the one that got me...I found out a short while back, that the Brits refer to cigarettes as "fags". I'd always knows a fag to me a gay male. I always wondered if England had a higher percentage of gay people because I was always reading about them sucking or smoking 'fags'...which gave me an impression there was much more of this going on in the open over there than here in the US.

    I remember reading about people complaining about too many people smoking fags in the pubs over there, and I thought "YIKES", you have to go to 'special' bars over here for that....then I found out about the cigarette meaning...whew.

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  109. Re:insert joke here by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    People use the word "gay" now to mean "stupid/dumb/lame/idiotic", on just about anything that happens that they don't like. It has morphed from the original meaning of happy, to the newer meaning of homosexual, to the pejorative term used generally on heterosexual males, to it's current form. All of those meanings still apply, context is everything. The word is going to eventually subsume all possible meanings and become the one word to rule all others.

    What few homosexual men I know, refer to themselves as "gay", so I don't know why it's necessarily assumed that its always pejorative, although certainly it moved from it's first meaning to the second based upon a stereotype of homosexuals as being Richard Simmons-like. While our understanding of homosexuality has changed, the word stuck around and just doesn't seem very offensive in the proper environment.

    I think you can turn any word into an insult if you use it in that context. "The filthy MARBLES are ruining our great nation, death to MARBLES !" "Dammit, MS released another broken operating system, that's so fucking MARBLE !"

  110. Newest version of Warcraft released - video link by wojc0008 · · Score: 1
  111. Socked, truly shocked by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

    Aside from being mildly amused that it's even possible to beat WoW, I am shocked - truly - that the person to "beat" the game first was not from Korea.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  112. Re:insert joke here by ground.zero.612 · · Score: 0

    When in the last 5 year has gay meant homosexual?

    Here in the US "gay" has been a derogatory term for at least 25 years. Saying something is "gay" puts a negative connotation on the subject. For example, in elementary school we would constantly call the nerds and the wimps gays, gayhomos, or gayfags. We reserved "faggot" for negative connotation of actual gays, er homosexuals.

    I suggest you teach your children to do the same and make fun of the other little nerds and wimps and faggots. God bless 'merica?

    --
    "Be prepared, son. That's my motto. Be prepared." --Joe Hallenbeck
  113. WOW dealers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got a 15 day trail disc from another PC game. Reminded me of that old drug dealer adage where they give you the first gram free lol.

  114. Um ok? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see a lot of people posting here on how this gentlemen has no life. My dad spent 3 years building a tiny wooden ship which is about 2 feet long. He's also got a lot of money and works during the day. So please, coming onto this forum and posting about WoW no lifers is soooooo 2004. Please, get with the times and grow up already.....

  115. This is explained by trivia: by BForrester · · Score: 1

    Ironically, the famous and brave Chuck Norris always posts as an Anonymous Coward.

    This is because he wanted his UID to be his strength expressed as a percentage, but unfortunately, slashdot doesn't support UIDs in the billions.

  116. Re:insert joke here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not your buddy, pal.

  117. Do we normally see this? by JJTJR · · Score: 1

    I don't recall ever hearing when someone 'beat' Everquest or other MMORPGs. Is there anything different about WoW, did those other stories happen years ago and I don' recall them, or is it just a SND (slow news day?

  118. Congressional districts by sabt-pestnu · · Score: 1

    Perhaps because the piece of software used to enter the raw data did not throw up flags when the raw data did not match reality?

    The people they polled didn't have a clue of their congressional district, so gave some random number. The web designer simply took data from the database and displayed it. The data entry people didn't have knowledge or instruction to chuck bogus data either.

    That only leaves the software used to enter data as a gatekeeper. And if someone specifies a valid district that is NOT the one they actually live in, you still can't tell.

    That poll would have been better served by using the 5-digit zip code. (The 9-digit one would raise even more privacy concerns than the 5-digit one does.)

  119. Social skills abound! by TheInsaneSicilian · · Score: 1

    While this person must have spent a great many hours accomplishing this goal, it may be a little unfair for us to infer that he has little to no social skills or "life"...

    He needs a guild or a bunch of "friends" behind him to accomplish a great many of these achievements. Even if he is in a huge guild that is defeating the most difficult end-game content, at some point there are going to be achievements that others are going to set out to do specifically and entirely for him (and maybe some others that luckily get to tag along)... The amount of achievements in this category is probably about 100-150 whereas the others are either able to be done solo or will just happen in any decent group.

    So, he befriended his guild or his group of online friends, with or without their knowledge, to help him get to this end-goal.

    We can even go further into specifics and say that the Quests completion may be more of an accomplishment than the Achievements completion. It is very easy to do about 3500-4000 of the quests in the game without any help, but beyond that there are chains that need help for sure. These hurdle quests don't make up the next 2000, probably only 100 or 200, but he still needs a group that he can call on whenever he hits that wall. Also remember those people may have already done the quest in some cases and are getting absolutely nothing out of it. In the case of achievements, at least there are a bunch of people (5-25) that are going to get that achievement credit if they haven't already.

    Actually, I think this guy may have more social skills than most...

  120. Re:insert joke here by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    (revs his motorcycle)

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  121. This is the first DOCUMENTED case. by Zoson · · Score: 0

    Many people have beaten WOW several times since it was released. As soon as a new content patch comes out, he'll no longer have beaten the game.

    Lets go kill Onyxia! -> done -> MC Released.
    Lets go kill Ragnaros! -> done -> BWL released.
    Lets go beat BWL! -> done -> AQ released.
    Lets go beat AQ! -> done -> Naxx released.

    This is nothing new, and not really an accomplishment at all.

    1. Re:This is the first DOCUMENTED case. by curado · · Score: 1

      With all the achievements and quests completed?

  122. LOTR? by thelonious · · Score: 0

    What's up with the picture in the article? Orcs are not equal!

  123. Re:insert joke here by FatSean · · Score: 1

    People who are so narcissistic that they can't imagine a universe without themselves as the center, and those cowards who cannot face their own death, invent religions out of whole cloth to 'explain' why they are so great and to give themselves comfort. These concepts are divisive and yet there is no taboo against 'tards who think they'll live forever with their magical sky daddy.

    I think the 'existence of taboos as evidence of wrongness' idea is wrong.

    --
    Blar.
  124. Oblig. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe that is the title of the article in Pravda.

  125. "Little Gray" receives award frm BlizzardTom Chil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Little Gray" receives award from Blizzard Tom Chilton

    http://images.gamebase.com.tw/gb_img/8/000/499/499958.jpg

  126. well there you have it by curado · · Score: 1

    I beat real life once but I rerolled as a normal computer nerd. Now I just lay low.

  127. milk the cow by ciganito · · Score: 0

    Honestly, he is far from beating the game looking at his stats on TBC and Classic. Beating the game at 80 (doing SWP and all of that overpowered, overgeared and massively nerfed) does not convince me. I would cheer if he had done the things on the right time, not now, and this last expantion, to be honest, its a "milk the cow" expantion. WoW does no longer require skill, it's just massive grinding and made for retards. Blizzard placed WoW as a milking cow, and it's share on the market is endangering even Blizzard's launch of new products. WoW will die as people get damn bored of the usual grinding and there's no longer hardcore raiders, every single 12 year oldie can get nearly everything, not to mention bots and such. Actually WoW is decaying.

    1. Re:milk the cow by LOLLinux · · Score: 1

      WoW does no longer require skill

      WoW ever required skill?

  128. Um anyone notice that he actually didnt win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if you click on the 986 achievements link you'll see that he got 165/164 player vs player and was 1 short in the world events category. I think he should have to finish the last world event to say that he beat it. then he would have 987/986 achievements and would be truely the man with no life.

    Whats one more achievement right?

  129. I can say that I understand. by StealthNet · · Score: 1

    Years ago my life used to be a mess. I started playing EVE-Online. Played for years and, during that period, my life got messier. I just got transported to the MMOG world for good. Used to play 16 to 18 hours a day at peak. But I don't regret it. It was not the root cause of my depression, but something else. In fact, I've made some really nice friends I talk to even years after that. In fact, the game, the people involved, and lots of other game related factors made me feel "useful" again. I mean, It is just a game, but those accomplishments got to the point where I asked myself: "if I'm able to accomplish things in a game, and have a social life inside an UI, why can't I have this IRL ?" Well, now I have it. Now I can say for sure that EVE helped me a lot. I have an active account (in fact, 2) and I simply don't have the time to play anymore, of course, due to real life. But tbh, I would like to have the time to play again somehow.

  130. Re:Online-gaming attention timespan by MBGMorden · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This I can agree with - not so much for disappearing from your team (which is a legitimate problem in and of itself), but also from an investment standpoint. My WoW characters have a TON of time and energy invested. I know the classes, I know the spells, I have good gear, and I've invested a lot of time in leveling them. Just going to another MMORPG feels like I'm ditching all that effort to start over somewhere else. I haven't even played WoW lately but the only other games I've been able to bring myself to play have been single player games where progression over a long term doesn't matter. Starting another MMORPG would feel like I'm splitting my resources.

    --
    "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
  131. Incredible. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I always forget how hard some of those acchievemnts are. One I saw after clicking a while said: "100,000 honerable kills". 100k! That is a shitton of clicking!

  132. Very anonymous coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Was it Leroy Jenkins?

  133. Re:insert joke here by Beyond_GoodandEvil · · Score: 1

    I think the 'existence of taboos as evidence of wrongness' idea is wrong
    Ugg, here's just a few(not that I have anything against homosexuals), eating raw pork and incest.

    --
    I laughed at the weak who considered themselves good because they lacked claws.
  134. Re:insert joke here by g253 · · Score: 3, Funny

    That's a jolly gay response. It makes me feel gay, thanks :)

  135. Re:insert joke here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Depends on what they meant by /hugging...

  136. Re:insert joke here by burisch_research · · Score: 1

    Oh, BELGIUM!

    --
    char*f="char*f=%c%s%c;main(){printf(f,34,f,34);}";main(){printf(f,34,f,34);}
  137. Also lacking "Insane in the Membrane"... by aapold · · Score: 1
    since this "achievement" doesn't grant any achievement points it isn't needed to max the bar, but is truly hardcore that he's got a ways to go...

    FWIW, Insane in the Membrane, which grants the title of "the Insane" requires:
    • requirements:
    • Honored with Bloodsail Buccaneers
    • Exalted with Booty Bay
    • Exalted with Rachet
    • Exalted with Everlook
    • Exalted with Gadgetzan
    • Exalted with Darkmoon Faire
    • Exalted with Shen’dralar
    • Exalted with Ravenholdt

    Our friend here is only Friendly with Shen'dralar, and is hated by all the Steamwheedle Cartel factions (Booty Bay, Rachet, Everlook and Gadgetzan). Given that Bloodsail and Steamwheedle oppose each other, he probably sacked the latter to build up the former, meaning he's after this too. He'll then have to get back in the good graces of Steamwheedle without doing any of the stuff that makes the Bloodsails angry, which means doing stuff in Ferelas, probably Dire Maul Key runs, which coincides with building Shen'dralar faction rep, so that's probably in his plans. Lastly he's only friendly with Ravenholdt, which is understandable since its mostly a rogue-only faction. In order to work this rep (and he's started somewhat already) he'll need to either get a rogue to farm the items for him and hand them to him or use a rogue alt. Either way sounds like even more mindless than what has gone already.

    --
    "Waste not one watt!" - CZ
  138. More to come by djnforce9 · · Score: 1

    He can celebrate for now but he'll surely have much much more to do once Cataclysm comes out.

  139. Not there yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He has yet to attain the "Insane" title

  140. Re:insert joke here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hummm, Whooooosh?

  141. OT: Blizzard revenue from WoW by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know how much Blizzard pulls in from WoW a year? What are the subscription numbers like now? I know you can't do simple calculations since other countries apparently charge a lot less per month.

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
  142. For those of you who say he has no life by daveryan · · Score: 1

    Get one yourself

    Cos this sort of comment only ever translates into one thing: "Get a life that is worthless in the same way as mine"

    And what harm has he done anyone? Does he beat the crap out of people because they're wearing a different colour football shirt? Does he hang about with his friends on street corners and cause trouble?

    No

    He made a choice, and done pretty damn well. It's not like he's tried to do something and fail at doing it.

    Sure you could argue it's only a game. So is chess. And tennis. And soccer. And football. And note that there's been no incident of WoW hooliganism ever (compare to football in the UK).

    Sure he doesn't have millions in cash or a supermodel girlfriend. Neither do any of the people accusing this guy of having no life, while watching reality TV and soap operas (like I said, their only complaint is that his life isn't hollow in the same way as theirs).

    If you don't like what he's done, then sod off cos it's done nobody any harm and no one asked for your approval.

    If it harmed him in any way, he chose to do this to himself in the same way as someone going out on the town every Weekend with their friends harms their liver by drinking too much alcohol. And no one's accusing them of having no life, even if they and their 'friends' need booze to enjoy themselves (why? don't they like each other sober?).

    It's not the people who harm no-one and concentrate on the one thing that shit all over this world.

    1. Re:For those of you who say he has no life by MistrX · · Score: 1

      Get a life!

      *hides*

  143. Re:insert joke here by Taevin · · Score: 1
    Taboo

    taboo (plural taboos)
    1. An inhibition or ban that results from social custom or emotional aversion.

    Taboo != "bad idea"

    Example: In some families, it is taboo to discuss sex. Why? There is no logical reason for this, it is only because social custom dictates that one not talk about their sexuality openly and this often leads people to having a negative emotional response to even thinking about that.

    In both of your examples, there are clear and well-known reasons not to engage in either eating raw pork or incest.

    When viewed from the "taboo as social custom" standpoint, I'm inclined to agree with FatSean. If the only reason you have for supporting a position is "that's the way it's always been done," then it's probably not the right position. At the very least, you're going to be hard pressed to show "tradition" as hard, logical evidence.

  144. Re:insert joke here by Sulphur · · Score: 1

    In the distance, a large building: R. Cratchitt, Ltd. A voice says "God bless us, every one."

  145. Re:insert joke here by FatSean · · Score: 1

    Back in the bad old Bronze Age, maybe they had merit.

    Today with refrigeration? I eat raw sushi all the time. Incest has also been identified as 'not that bad'. The more we learn, the less these simplistic rules apply.

    Taboos are just the antiquated ideas that helped an ancient culture get by...they become increasingly irrelevant in our modern science-based society if you ask me.

    --
    Blar.
  146. Re:insert joke here by Korin43 · · Score: 1

    Here's some more things that are or were taboo:
    - Eating cats, dogs or horses
    - Working on Sunday
    - Burping around other people
    - Marrying someone of another race
    - Not cutting off parts of your genitals
    - Women showing their faces/hair/ankles

    If any of those things weren't taboo, the world would be a terrible place.

  147. Re:insert joke here by EvilJoker · · Score: 1

    The trick is getting anyone else to use it. If you can get that, you can make up all sorts of words/meanings. For good examples, look at how language has changed in the past 10 years just in rap and ebonics.

    Although, I do like the idea of referring to someone as a marble, sounds very condescending.

  148. what next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Holy shit... it's all over... hmmm... ... ... i'll beat it with a tank!"

  149. You probably won't care when it happens by snowwrestler · · Score: 1

    That's how you'll know it's happening. So I wouldn't worry about being too upset.

    --
    Build a man a fire, he's warm for one night. Set him on fire, and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    1. Re:You probably won't care when it happens by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      It's the implication I dread. It's not that some people I probably don't know will go into an existential crisis or even kill themselves. It's that the media will take the crap and ride it. I still want to be able to play games without having to consult a shrink first to get a certificate that I'm not going to kill myself over it. I could well see some nannystate proponents push for an MMO ban or something similar just because some people can't get their act together.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  150. Re:insert joke here by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I mostly just post on /. in between performing open heart surgery while negotiating peace in the Middle East, and standing in as a Supreme Court Justice while composing symphonies, too.

    --
    Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
  151. I beat WoW a long time ago... by mindwhip · · Score: 1

    By quitting and getting a life... ... well trying to get a life at least

    --
    [The Universe] has gone offline.
  152. My experience: followup by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

    This game is round-based, an MMO but not an RPG; I've made a commitment to not play the next round, although I've made a similar committment to see this round through to its end. The round seems to be taking too damn long to end, though.
    I'm a major player on what looks like will be the winning team; harassment (though serious) by the underdogs, as well as the admins' opinion of the victory condition, is dragging this out.
    (Ironically, I'm still playing, but thanks to the uncertain round end, I didn't pay for as much premium-account time as I could have)

    I've tried playing multiple such MMOs at once, and yes, it ain't pretty. I did switch to the current one because I figured its gameplay had more depth and nuance than the others.

    I referenced Civ II and Starcraft [campaign and occassional AI] as a couple of my favorite non-multiplayer games. (Age of Empires, Sim City, and various others could join the list). While I do get caught up on several-hour sessions of those, they don't carry the multiplayer baggage, and they aren't running when I'm AFK.

    I play one game of that type for several weeks, maybe months, at a time, but I can easily drop it and grab another CD-ROM when I feel like it.
    Several months' patience seems necessary for these MMO rounds, and sometimes the rounds runneth over.

    I do make use of Magic Workstation (free & closed-source, used to play TCGs online against real opponents) as well - sure that's multiplayer, but it's only several minutes to a couple hours at a time, the matches are separate from each other, and I pick it up exactly when I feel like it. Multiplayer like that (which includes things like Battle.net) only carries the minor annoyances of random interruptions during a 'session'.

    Oh yeah, there's also an issue of serious stuff (namely, university, and to a lesser extent my Internet business), as well as the random personal projects (organizing my music collection, whatever).

    Okay, okay, y'all want me to name names of the MMOs?
    Oh, I'm not bitter really, I've just figured I've had enough of a good thing, and I know why.

    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  153. you are a sick sick puppy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "that girl who has given head to over a dozen different guys by the time she was 15"

    she was probably molested or something and never got counseling. if you think that is similar to WoW addiction... uhm... you got issues.

  154. Let's prememptively address this... by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

    Magic Workstation (free & closed-source...)

    In terms of the vocabulary, I generally like breaking down the "Beer" and "Speech" components.

    I am typing this with the normal textbox in Mozila Firefox (free & open-source), rather than Microsoft Word (nonfree & closed-source). :P

    Speaking of heated vocabulary debates, I'm off to watch some football. :P

    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  155. You miss the most important point. by PMBjornerud · · Score: 1

    Simply put, do what YOU love, fuck the rest of the world. Most people are idiots anyways.

    No.

    Do what will maximize your happiness throughout your life.

    Plenty of WoW players have lived to change their mind and regret their priorities. Worst case: A few years of WoW, at the cost of girlfriend and education. 50 years left to regret the choice.

    Of course, your brain will start making excuses and you might convince yourself it is actually all for the better and what you wanted all along. And you're happy. Such happiness is hollow and dry, deep down you know it is wrong.

    A balanced life has value in our culture because it is the lifestyle that tend to give the most happiness in the long run.

    --
    I lost my sig.
    1. Re:You miss the most important point. by Sprouticus · · Score: 1

      1) The key word you used there is culture. Our culture values balance highly. Other cultures value it less.

      2) Whether someone regrets an aciton has nothing to do with anything. That is simply that person having no ability to evaluate what really makes them happy.

      Your assumption that everyone is like you, or that everyone fits into the mold of a 'typical' person who gains more benifit from a balanced life ignores the fact that there are many people who are only really happy when they are uber-focused.

      If someone wishes to live ttheir life that way and they really are happy, more power to them.

      Now, as to whether some people bury themselves in activities to compensate for unhappiness elsewhere in their life, thats a different subject.

      But your blanket assumption of what makes EVEYRONE happy is foolosh and shortsighted.

  156. Gay? You think they stole gay? by StoneKarma · · Score: 1

    Just look what they did to rainbows! What happens if I just happen to like rainbows? Huh? Ever thought of that? My little pony, carebears, tele-tubbies. They took my childhood. Bastards! -eric- "Make no mistake about why these babies are here; they are here to replace us." - Jerry Seinfeld

  157. New Patch Tuesday by shambalagoon · · Score: 1

    Next Up: the new WoW 3.3 patch comes out next Tuesday, which will render this headline inaccurate.

    You can't get to the end of something that has no end.

  158. Re:insert joke here by vgerdj · · Score: 1

    Buckaroo Banzai is that you?

  159. Re:insert joke here by EdgeCreeper · · Score: 1

    His WoW game was running at 69 frames per second.

  160. Re:insert joke here by alexandre_ganso · · Score: 1

    Today with refrigeration? I eat raw sushi all the time.

    Sushi is not pork. Let wikipedia explain it to you: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cysticercosis
    http://www-lab.biomedicas.unam.mx/cistimex/s5/CVe-infeccion.gif

  161. People are drawn to WoW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    not because it is addicting, simply because it offers you more opportunity to succeed at something than real life. While much like real life, success is not guaranteed, you don't lose much by trying. In real world this is not always the case. Also relevant, while in real world you may be rewarded for success, it is not always true. And you are usually punished for failure. To top it off, real world gives you a more unfair playing field.

    Instead of asking yourself what is wrong with people who escape to WoW, you should ask yourself why is the real world so fucked up? And why are you so fucked up if you think it's OK.

  162. Re:Of course ("All Things in Moderation") by progliberty · · Score: 1

    Well, actually that isn't true. There is overwhelming proof that "all things in moderation" is true and a good rule to follow. You simply graph the use or intake of any prime motivator (sugar, internet/web, sex, humor, games) and you will see an area of the graph that represents enjoyment with low consequences... then you will see an area where it overflows into ruining a persons life because of not paying attention to other obligations, lack of exercise, body cant handle it because it's too much, other people hurt by ones actions and retaliating, missing all appointments, and so on. However, in this case, there's no proof that beating World of Warcraft has negative consequences. All we have to go on is a South Park episode where idiotic characters were depicted as becoming grossly overweight after playing the game (as opposed to, say, watching TV or spending time at work or in Church)

  163. Next up... by Cur8or · · Score: 0

    Farmville! All your crops are belong to us.

    --
    Winkey shortcut mapping for 64bit windows. WinKeyPlus
  164. Re:I fear the day, Too Big TO Fail by kenp2002 · · Score: 1

    EQ2 was a sequel vs. a reboot.

    --
    -=[ Who Is John Galt? ]=-
  165. Re:I fear the day, Too Big TO Fail by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Either way, "rebooting" EQ would result in a fail. Simply because people's taste in MMOs have changed. People don't want "hard" MMOs anymore. People don't want "must group" MMOs anymore. People want easy mode and quick rewards.

    Don't take my word for it, name one MMO that's become a success that is more like EQ than WoW that was successful recently. Name one where death is unforgiving and grouping is mandatory.

    Besides EvE. EvE is a completely different beast.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  166. Re:I fear the day, Too Big TO Fail by kenp2002 · · Score: 1

    Eve Online
    Guild Wars

    --
    -=[ Who Is John Galt? ]=-
  167. Re:I fear the day, Too Big TO Fail by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    EvE does not count, as I said. EvE is no MMO in the traditional sense, which means that it is successful despite the difficulty and hardships. It's in the situation EQ was, it's the only one of its kind. I'm not too sure if an "easier" EvE could not attract a sizable portion of its user base, but being such a small user base it is unlikely any company will try to rip them from CCP.

    And I don't see where the big death penalty is in GW?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.