I drive like a complete idiot. But I've never been in a wreck. So I sent Progressive their little thingy back after connecting it to my grandmother's car for a month.
The Times should be lauded for attempting to "remove bias" (on the face of it, an impossible task) for this one topic. If only they could address their own political biases. I suggest not making your next exhalation so contigent.
Oppose censorship? Put your monkey where your mouth is: publish this. (It was rejected by you and your esteemed colleagues.)
Slashdot advertiser Yahoo!(TM) has been identified by Reporters Without Borders as helping Chinese state security officials of convicting Shi Tao of "illegally providing top state secrets to overseas organizations." From [0]: "He was convicted on 30 April of sending foreign-based websites the text of an internal message which the authorities had sent to his newspaper warning journalists of the dangers of social destabilisation and risks resulting from the return of certain dissidents on the 15th anniversary of the Tiananmen Square massacre." This continues the saga of Yahoo!(TM)'s complicity in censorship by repressive governments, well documented here and in the press.
I know where you want to go here. Difference is, "your" turtle theory? I think the shuttle and ISS occupants can discredit that one with a glance.
And that's the essential point: there's nothing like a glance or a very close look that can refute or add credence to ID. You're required to take it on faith.
Slashdot Mirror
I drive like a complete idiot. But I've never been in a wreck. So I sent Progressive their little thingy back after connecting it to my grandmother's car for a month.
Awesome. But I still can't find the missing lithium.
This isn't a prediction. For that you'd have to be able to prove that the repeat offenders actually did something heinous. Like became politicians.
This doesn't explain the Bieber phenomenon.
To wit: Stuxnet
My shock isn't with the imminent demise of email. But with the hard-hitting journalism of the "liberal" Washington Post.
Now, if only Bobby Fisher would take a stab at taking down Bush.
The Times should be lauded for attempting to "remove bias" (on the face of it, an impossible task) for this one topic. If only they could address their own political biases. I suggest not making your next exhalation so contigent.
Oppose censorship? Put your monkey where your mouth is: publish this. (It was rejected by you and your esteemed colleagues.)
Slashdot advertiser Yahoo!(TM) has been identified by Reporters Without Borders as helping Chinese state security officials of convicting Shi Tao of "illegally providing top state secrets to overseas organizations." From [0]: "He was convicted on 30 April of sending foreign-based websites the text of an internal message which the authorities had sent to his newspaper warning journalists of the dangers of social destabilisation and risks resulting from the return of certain dissidents on the 15th anniversary of the Tiananmen Square massacre." This continues the saga of Yahoo!(TM)'s complicity in censorship by repressive governments, well documented here and in the press.
I know where you want to go here. Difference is, "your" turtle theory? I think the shuttle and ISS occupants can discredit that one with a glance. And that's the essential point: there's nothing like a glance or a very close look that can refute or add credence to ID. You're required to take it on faith.
Superfluid=single quantum state
Perfect fluid=no viscosity Different.
Maybe the emphasis should be on "no better."
On the back of the neck or right out in front, on the forehead. Your choice.
[Sarcasm alert!] Yes, because it's a URL people can no longer discern between differently spelled words.