If the hammer is swung enough to have more force than a "normal sized" bullet then the concrete below will be damaged somewhat, this was not supposed to be the case.
How many products in todays marketplace are running below their peak efficiency?, it's becoming somewhat ridiculous that if you wish to get your full moneys worth out of a product you need to use another product to unlock it.
Unfortunately there are a lot of salesmen who think so highly of themselve that they beleive they could convince a fish to buy a bicycle. Guess its the same with SCO, they are so arrogant that they think that they are so good Linux NEEDS them, They're wrong.
Well it will most likely be used for some cluster computing, if the price is right someone will no doubt make software for it. Even if that someone is Intel.
When the advantages are so high (less need for caching) people always MAKE these things work.
Does anyone else get a warm feeling when someone who didnt break a law DOESNT get convicted of it?
Everyone breathe a sigh of relief now. Maybe we wont all get jailed if someone steals a knife from our home then kills someone else with it.
Hurah for Freedom.
It would make for a much better story if each and every one of us sent a letter to SCO asking them to site the code they are talking about(offer a bounty for it if necessary), how many emails do you think it would take to shut down SCO's mail server permanently?...Now that I think about it that all depends on how many photos of high quality ass-scannings are sent in.(I'm sending 4 as a side note)
Everyone from Slashdot needs to buy SCO stock. But all at the same time as to not pay inflated prices. Now let's just say that all the Slashdot users put a few hundred dollars into SCO stock. Then we all co-ordinate to sell the stock at the now inflated price (once again at the same time). Not only will we all gain a few bucks from SCO but we may drive the share price down. Win-Win situation.
(Oh and if this is illegal please tell me so I can spend the profit BEFORE my arrest)
I'm all for copyright, and I will even support the removal of every piece of copyrighted code from linux. IF and only if it was there and they started prove it. Its not really as hard as they make it sound, it involves a highlighter and a few judges. Thats the best thing about open source, if someone makes the mistake of putting in code that is copyrighted or just plain stupid it is removed.
The reason everyone is agains SCO is the stupidity of their attacks. It goes against logic (and natural selection for that matter) to fix the problem in the way SCO is. UNLESS of course they dont want the problem solved so much as want to make money from it.
Corporate officials are not all the much more trustworthy, unless I see hard evidence either way this becomes a mute point. All goes down too who you trust more, companies out to get your money or individuals out to get your money.
Best way to stop them getting it is to not have any money, which is working out just fine for me.
Slashdot Mirror
If the hammer is swung enough to have more force than a "normal sized" bullet then the concrete below will be damaged somewhat, this was not supposed to be the case.
It might just win too.
How many products in todays marketplace are running below their peak efficiency?, it's becoming somewhat ridiculous that if you wish to get your full moneys worth out of a product you need to use another product to unlock it.
It is more likely that the illegal works will be created by an individual user, or seperate body to the wine project.
Who does BIGGER PENIS NOW blame? I bet they blame Microsoft, "They just wanted to get in the news."
Unfortunately there are a lot of salesmen who think so highly of themselve that they beleive they could convince a fish to buy a bicycle. Guess its the same with SCO, they are so arrogant that they think that they are so good Linux NEEDS them, They're wrong.
Well it will most likely be used for some cluster computing, if the price is right someone will no doubt make software for it. Even if that someone is Intel. When the advantages are so high (less need for caching) people always MAKE these things work.
Does anyone else get a warm feeling when someone who didnt break a law DOESNT get convicted of it? Everyone breathe a sigh of relief now. Maybe we wont all get jailed if someone steals a knife from our home then kills someone else with it. Hurah for Freedom.
And once again an idea or product has been improved drastically by allowing others to view, comment and change it.
It would make for a much better story if each and every one of us sent a letter to SCO asking them to site the code they are talking about(offer a bounty for it if necessary), how many emails do you think it would take to shut down SCO's mail server permanently? ...Now that I think about it that all depends on how many photos of high quality ass-scannings are sent in.(I'm sending 4 as a side note)
Everyone from Slashdot needs to buy SCO stock. But all at the same time as to not pay inflated prices. Now let's just say that all the Slashdot users put a few hundred dollars into SCO stock. Then we all co-ordinate to sell the stock at the now inflated price (once again at the same time). Not only will we all gain a few bucks from SCO but we may drive the share price down. Win-Win situation. (Oh and if this is illegal please tell me so I can spend the profit BEFORE my arrest)
I'm all for copyright, and I will even support the removal of every piece of copyrighted code from linux. IF and only if it was there and they started prove it. Its not really as hard as they make it sound, it involves a highlighter and a few judges. Thats the best thing about open source, if someone makes the mistake of putting in code that is copyrighted or just plain stupid it is removed. The reason everyone is agains SCO is the stupidity of their attacks. It goes against logic (and natural selection for that matter) to fix the problem in the way SCO is. UNLESS of course they dont want the problem solved so much as want to make money from it.
Corporate officials are not all the much more trustworthy, unless I see hard evidence either way this becomes a mute point. All goes down too who you trust more, companies out to get your money or individuals out to get your money. Best way to stop them getting it is to not have any money, which is working out just fine for me.