Okay, dumb question here, why can't we just stop allowing emails where the list of IP's for the domain aren't part of the email routing? I'm sure sysadmins can make that happen - where every SMTP server has the same domain as the email address that's sending out.
That way the sender is forced to send on their own domain's behalf.
Yeah, it's not perfect, and domain registration can get all screwy, but domain registration can be traced to a credit card.
everyone knows the world was created 6000 years ago.
I'm waiting to find out how the giant lizards and the pygmie elephants got from the top of Mount Sinai to this island as well. And how did they brung the giant lizards and pygmie elephants?
And some hollywood types like Alec Baldwin and Matt Damon are F.A.G.s:)
seriously though, there was some hollywood endoresement from jackasses like the governator and the like... Can't recall all of them right now though...
FWIW though, you spread the cost further out if you have one big socialed health care system.
Because there's a tonne of carriers in the US, the risk isn't shared as far, and many of the costs within these insurance co's are duplicate - building, rent, G&A expenses, management, board of directors. It's a all duplicate cost.
As well, Insurance benefits from economies of scale. The more you spread the risk the cheaper (in theory) the insurance should be.
Only part of it was for domestic manufacturing. Of partiular note is this part:
--Revise rules governing treatment of multinational corporations including allowing companies with overseas operations to bring profits back to the United States at a reduced rate for a limited time. Cost: $42.6 billion.
I interpret that as giving multinationals a tax break (HP falls under this category). They've outsourced work to India.
I don't understand how GW Bush can get away with the BS that America has the best health care system in the world. AFAIK, that's measured by infant mortality rates, average lifespan, and other aggregate data. I don't know where that tit-head gets his info from, but all the statistics I've read don't indicate that Americans are the healthiest in the world, so how can it be the best health care? National health is about the health of everyone, not just the rich assholes who can afford it.
Uhm, they weren't getting them for free; don't you still need a ohip card to get it covered?
AFAIK, they were paying, now they aren't even allowed to pay.
Someone can make really good money smuggling in flushots this fall. Just need to know the right people and have some mules willing to shove flu vaccine up their ass...
If you're critical you get bumped up the list. From what I understand, not many people die on a waiting list. Granted some accidents have happened. Most of the griping about waiting lists has to do with the pain of a condition, not death or further damage. If it's critical you get bumping rights.
Oh, and there's a loophole. Prisoners get bumping rights because the govt doesn't want to be responsible for an inmate's death in their custody. So if you really want your surgery, grab a plastic gun and rob a bank. Worse case scenario you don't get caught and get a financial windfall to pay for your US surgery:)
On behalf of Canadians, we ask that you please stop trying to push our drug prices up by buying them in Canada. We're happy with our drug prices and don't want to have the same problems they have in America. thanks, but go to Mexico:)
If you're critical you jump to the top of the queue. If you're non critical you're on a waiting list. That's how it works in Canada. My fiance's father had to get a pacemaker in. He jumped everyone to get it in. His heart beat was under 30bpm... That's critical.
Depends - if it's 50k in the US and 10k in India, maybe it's worth your while. I mean, if you're critical and you need treatment, and you can only afford 10k, then screw the recourse - you throw the dice - you have a better chance dropping 10k on the surgery than not having it at all.
Slashdot Mirror
That assumes some form of evolution, of which bible-thumpers deny. The earth is as it was at the after the flood.
The department of homeland security has declared this is not terror related.
Okay, dumb question here, why can't we just stop allowing emails where the list of IP's for the domain aren't part of the email routing? I'm sure sysadmins can make that happen - where every SMTP server has the same domain as the email address that's sending out.
That way the sender is forced to send on their own domain's behalf.
Yeah, it's not perfect, and domain registration can get all screwy, but domain registration can be traced to a credit card.
everyone knows the world was created 6000 years ago.
I'm waiting to find out how the giant lizards and the pygmie elephants got from the top of Mount Sinai to this island as well. And how did they brung the giant lizards and pygmie elephants?
Wasn't Bush lobying Congress to amend the consitution to include the definition of marriage?
Right on - although my msg wasn't addressed to you in particular... More of a general warning - call if fear mongering if you will :)
(I'm in Canada btw - Dubya hasn't done nothing but piss Canadians off too.)
Elect GW Bush for another term, and expect DMCA and Patriot act engrained in the constitution by an act of Congress.
That's okay, GW Bush can't pronounce it anyway lol... If it's nucular it's okay :)
But how'd you ground the motherboard?
And some hollywood types like Alec Baldwin and Matt Damon are F.A.G.s :)
seriously though, there was some hollywood endoresement from jackasses like the governator and the like... Can't recall all of them right now though...
FWIW though, you spread the cost further out if you have one big socialed health care system.
Because there's a tonne of carriers in the US, the risk isn't shared as far, and many of the costs within these insurance co's are duplicate - building, rent, G&A expenses, management, board of directors. It's a all duplicate cost.
As well, Insurance benefits from economies of scale. The more you spread the risk the cheaper (in theory) the insurance should be.
Click here
Only part of it was for domestic manufacturing. Of partiular note is this part:
--Revise rules governing treatment of multinational corporations including allowing companies with overseas operations to bring profits back to the United States at a reduced rate for a limited time. Cost: $42.6 billion. I interpret that as giving multinationals a tax break (HP falls under this category). They've outsourced work to India.
Granted you were partly right.
Thanks bro - a couple people have accused me of being materialistic in wanting to throw her the best wedding possible.
Well So far google's paid otu $350US to us - about $450 CAD... That'll pay for better decorations or something...
Appreciate the help... THanks!
I don't understand how GW Bush can get away with the BS that America has the best health care system in the world. AFAIK, that's measured by infant mortality rates, average lifespan, and other aggregate data. I don't know where that tit-head gets his info from, but all the statistics I've read don't indicate that Americans are the healthiest in the world, so how can it be the best health care? National health is about the health of everyone, not just the rich assholes who can afford it.
Uhm, they weren't getting them for free; don't you still need a ohip card to get it covered?
AFAIK, they were paying, now they aren't even allowed to pay.
Someone can make really good money smuggling in flushots this fall. Just need to know the right people and have some mules willing to shove flu vaccine up their ass...
ROFLMAO that was pretty witty LOL...
Did you hear that Bush announced more tax breaks for US corporations? $120b...
So that means that US companies are opening plants in China and India, and the US Govt gives them a tax cut to do so.
That means that YOUR taxes are paying so HP can open call centers in India. Got that? And your children will forever be paying for it.
No offence, but if you guys re-elect that retard, your country will be the laughing stock of the world.
Bingo! You rock... Well put.
How come you haven't moved back? For tech jobs, the money's better , but the rent is so much nastier...
Poorer country? How do you figure? In the 1990's we had a lower GDP per capita, but our quality if life is higher on the charts.
We're healthier - we're not as fat as our American cousins.
We live longer - 79.8 years instead of 77.3 years in the US.
Our infant mortality rate is lower - 5 / 1,000 vs. 6 / 1 in America.
Our maternal mortality rate is lower.
I'd say we might be poorer in GDP/capita, but quality of life isn't just GDP/capita; it's about the life you live.
Plenty of Canadian biotech and pharamaceutical companies listed on the TSX. That's bollocks.
Remember, GW Bush even suggested buying flu vaccines from a Vancouver company, but it wasn't FDA approved, so too bad.
If you're critical you get bumped up the list. From what I understand, not many people die on a waiting list. Granted some accidents have happened. Most of the griping about waiting lists has to do with the pain of a condition, not death or further damage. If it's critical you get bumping rights.
:)
Oh, and there's a loophole. Prisoners get bumping rights because the govt doesn't want to be responsible for an inmate's death in their custody. So if you really want your surgery, grab a plastic gun and rob a bank. Worse case scenario you don't get caught and get a financial windfall to pay for your US surgery
On behalf of Canadians, we ask that you please stop trying to push our drug prices up by buying them in Canada. We're happy with our drug prices and don't want to have the same problems they have in America. thanks, but go to Mexico :)
If you're critical you jump to the top of the queue. If you're non critical you're on a waiting list. That's how it works in Canada. My fiance's father had to get a pacemaker in. He jumped everyone to get it in. His heart beat was under 30bpm... That's critical.
Depends - if it's 50k in the US and 10k in India, maybe it's worth your while. I mean, if you're critical and you need treatment, and you can only afford 10k, then screw the recourse - you throw the dice - you have a better chance dropping 10k on the surgery than not having it at all.
Heck I'd do it if I had to.
Maybe the HMOs will smarten up and not hold you hostage for your money then - that's basically what HMOs do.
What am I thinking??? HMO's own enough of congress where they can get bills passed to prohibit that kind of behaviour.
That's the best thing I've heard - global competition on health care.
But then again, it's all free in Canada - I spend $800 a year to have the right to any emergency or critical care in Canada. That's not too bad IMO.