We'll just load them up and hold them on a siding in Detroit. By the time the storage facitity is finished, we won't be able to tell the waste cars from all the other tagged rolling stock.
To be honest, it was the/. editor who just shoved a paragraph into the summary which had no business being there.
It's a popular trick for manipulating search engine results: Insert some remark into an article claiming a positive corelation between X and nationalized health care. Later, you can Google 'healthcare' and cite several thousand (uncontested) articles supporting your conclusion.
The US asked an Irish court to issue a warrant to force production of the data. The Irish court refused to issue the warrant.
And the question here is: Why?
It's possible that the 'crime' commited may not have been a crime in Ireland (I'm thinking failure to pay unitary taxes). Or that one or more parties to this communications resides in the EU and is subject to EU privacy regulations (which might answer why Microsoft stored this in Ireland in the first place).
Could you give an example of a more secure platform?
Sure. Any e-mail system which has users encrypt/decrypt their content locally and then use the storage and transport system solely for storage and transport Slap some directory and key management for (public keys only) on top of that and there you go.
You (the gov't) subpoena the content from the service provider? Sure, here's an encrypted copy. We don't have anything else. Need that decryption key? Go see the sender or recipient. We don't have that.
But if an American visits a foreign country, they and their property are subject to the laws of that county. We expect the same of foreign visitors entering our country. And if that foreign countries data protection laws differ from those of the USA, they should still be honored.
Having some foreign government insist on the right to root around in their citizens possesions while in this country, either as a tourist or a refugee would open up a human rights as well as an intellectual property can of worms. Imagine an H-1B worker's home country insisting on receiving copies of all of their work product while employed here.
Maybe, maybe not. But it is accepted that opiates are more lethal than marijuana. And if some peopleare satisfied with the replacement, that's a step in the right direction from the point of view of death rates.
It appears that the biggest anti-marijuana movement is made up of the drug companies that stand to loose opiate sales to m.j.
Its either plausible deniability or the need to demonstrate an unbroken and untainted chain of evidence. The NSA may in fact already have access to this data. But acting like they don't, or even loosing a minor case might set other criminals at ease about the security of their data within the Microsoft infrastructure. And they won't switch to a more secure platform. The chain of evidence might be needed to keep a subsequent trial from being thrown out due to tainted evidence. The NSA may already have the evidence (through questionable means), but getting a clean copy removes issues of it being fruit of the poisonous tree.
Its an American's data stored under a European account in European servers.
Perhaps. But if it was an American, residing on European soil, there would be extradition procedures to follow. And those would involve having the local (EU) police generate their own warrant and make their own arrest based upon a formal request. The aprehended suspect would then be turned over to the requesting country.
The same sort of thing should happen here. The USA should make a formal request to the Irish court to secure the evidence and turn it over to US authorities.
I think this has been established on several different levels. Women are more interested in the social context associated with a message than men are. Its not just what was said, but who said it. So an anonymous setting leaves them without this particular parameter.
she's going to use her wands to locate an electrical line
But you saw her 'follow procedure' for the dangerous stuff. Everything else (water, sewer, cable, telephone) will be a nuisance if it's cut. But it won't kill anyone.
I don't know why she dowses for some stuff, but uses tech for the important stuff. I've been in the utility business for long enough that I can usually spot the water meters, sewer clean-outs and network interface boxes and make an educated guess about where stuff was installed. The witching wands are probably her way of keeping most customers from griping about guesswork.
My first instinct with this particular woman is indeed that she's lying or making it up.
TFA says she called the police. They don't take too kindly to people filing false reports. So my first instinct is to believe that she feels threatened.
It may turn out to be some neck-beard gamer who will never leave his parents' basement to carry out said threats. Or it could be another Elliot Rodger. That's for the cops to settle. What would be really bad: Rodger didn't necessarily go after the objects of his rage. He killed the most convenient people. So the next time you are sitting in the food court of the local mall next to the loser section, take a look around and see if one of them is giving you a wierd look.
We still don't know what the hell gravity is (other than a property of matter) but we no longer question it's existence and have developed a very good understanding of how it behaves.
Maybe not so good. ts possible that dark matter is just a fudge factor tat we need to apply to Newton's inverse square law over larger distances or for larger masses.
Here's an interesting thought puzzle: Assume the effects of gravity are caried by some yet to be discovered particle/wave (gravitons) and these 'particles' are subject to the same laws of physics that all other partices are (photons, for example). Then how do they escape the gravitational pull of a black hole? If photons can't get out, then how do these gravitons? If gravity exists as a wave, then why wouldn't the gravitational attraction of the black hole bend these waves back around into itself, preventing it's effects on neighboring matter
We'll just load them up and hold them on a siding in Detroit. By the time the storage facitity is finished, we won't be able to tell the waste cars from all the other tagged rolling stock.
To be honest, it was the /. editor who just shoved a paragraph into the summary which had no business being there.
It's a popular trick for manipulating search engine results: Insert some remark into an article claiming a positive corelation between X and nationalized health care. Later, you can Google 'healthcare' and cite several thousand (uncontested) articles supporting your conclusion.
The US asked an Irish court to issue a warrant to force production of the data. The Irish court refused to issue the warrant.
And the question here is: Why?
It's possible that the 'crime' commited may not have been a crime in Ireland (I'm thinking failure to pay unitary taxes). Or that one or more parties to this communications resides in the EU and is subject to EU privacy regulations (which might answer why Microsoft stored this in Ireland in the first place).
Could you give an example of a more secure platform?
Sure. Any e-mail system which has users encrypt/decrypt their content locally and then use the storage and transport system solely for storage and transport Slap some directory and key management for (public keys only) on top of that and there you go.
You (the gov't) subpoena the content from the service provider? Sure, here's an encrypted copy. We don't have anything else. Need that decryption key? Go see the sender or recipient. We don't have that.
Because the primary contractor's business is cobbling stuff together designed and built by others.
BFR? Big F*ing Rocket?
Now if only we could get a Martian to IM during the process: "Yes. The little red LED is blinking ....."
But if an American visits a foreign country, they and their property are subject to the laws of that county. We expect the same of foreign visitors entering our country. And if that foreign countries data protection laws differ from those of the USA, they should still be honored.
Having some foreign government insist on the right to root around in their citizens possesions while in this country, either as a tourist or a refugee would open up a human rights as well as an intellectual property can of worms. Imagine an H-1B worker's home country insisting on receiving copies of all of their work product while employed here.
You can't really dust for vomit.
function in a more-or-less normal way
Maybe, maybe not. But it is accepted that opiates are more lethal than marijuana. And if some peopleare satisfied with the replacement, that's a step in the right direction from the point of view of death rates.
It appears that the biggest anti-marijuana movement is made up of the drug companies that stand to loose opiate sales to m.j.
What, is this all just for show?
Its either plausible deniability or the need to demonstrate an unbroken and untainted chain of evidence. The NSA may in fact already have access to this data. But acting like they don't, or even loosing a minor case might set other criminals at ease about the security of their data within the Microsoft infrastructure. And they won't switch to a more secure platform. The chain of evidence might be needed to keep a subsequent trial from being thrown out due to tainted evidence. The NSA may already have the evidence (through questionable means), but getting a clean copy removes issues of it being fruit of the poisonous tree.
Its an American's data stored under a European account in European servers.
Perhaps. But if it was an American, residing on European soil, there would be extradition procedures to follow. And those would involve having the local (EU) police generate their own warrant and make their own arrest based upon a formal request. The aprehended suspect would then be turned over to the requesting country.
The same sort of thing should happen here. The USA should make a formal request to the Irish court to secure the evidence and turn it over to US authorities.
Oh yeah, my car has a carburetor. None of that sludge that ethanol pulls in bothers it like injected cars.
Rule 1: Ask questions about the no fly list.
I think this has been established on several different levels. Women are more interested in the social context associated with a message than men are. Its not just what was said, but who said it. So an anonymous setting leaves them without this particular parameter.
Its not even rocket surgery.
she's going to use her wands to locate an electrical line
But you saw her 'follow procedure' for the dangerous stuff. Everything else (water, sewer, cable, telephone) will be a nuisance if it's cut. But it won't kill anyone.
I don't know why she dowses for some stuff, but uses tech for the important stuff. I've been in the utility business for long enough that I can usually spot the water meters, sewer clean-outs and network interface boxes and make an educated guess about where stuff was installed. The witching wands are probably her way of keeping most customers from griping about guesswork.
worship nanny state polices.
That's their religion. The 25% who rely on faith are praying they don't die before they get to the head of the queue*.
It looked like a pretty good summary until our fearless editor had to pull that healthcare stuff out of his ass.
*I live near the border and I can see all the wealthy Canadians bypass the socialized system by coming down here with cash.
My first instinct with this particular woman is indeed that she's lying or making it up.
TFA says she called the police. They don't take too kindly to people filing false reports. So my first instinct is to believe that she feels threatened.
It may turn out to be some neck-beard gamer who will never leave his parents' basement to carry out said threats. Or it could be another Elliot Rodger. That's for the cops to settle. What would be really bad: Rodger didn't necessarily go after the objects of his rage. He killed the most convenient people. So the next time you are sitting in the food court of the local mall next to the loser section, take a look around and see if one of them is giving you a wierd look.
Shut up and take my money!
Smoke signals.
Well then screw it. I'm fueling up the SUV and towing the ski boat down to the lake to enjoy these last few years before The End Of The Earth.
We still don't know what the hell gravity is (other than a property of matter) but we no longer question it's existence and have developed a very good understanding of how it behaves.
Maybe not so good. ts possible that dark matter is just a fudge factor tat we need to apply to Newton's inverse square law over larger distances or for larger masses.
Here's an interesting thought puzzle: Assume the effects of gravity are caried by some yet to be discovered particle/wave (gravitons) and these 'particles' are subject to the same laws of physics that all other partices are (photons, for example). Then how do they escape the gravitational pull of a black hole? If photons can't get out, then how do these gravitons? If gravity exists as a wave, then why wouldn't the gravitational attraction of the black hole bend these waves back around into itself, preventing it's effects on neighboring matter
You can scream this at the top of your lungs until you are blue in the face,
Not necessarily.
You haven't proved a causative link between excessive vocalization and having a blue face.