Slashdot Mirror


User: computational+super

computational+super's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
1,654
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 1,654

  1. Re:Porn? on SCOTUS Nominee Kagan On Free Speech Issues · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We have yet to learn the lesson of the Weimar republic - although I wish we could learn from Germany's (hell, anybody's) mistakes, we haven't had much luck in that area as of yet.

  2. Re:Porn? on SCOTUS Nominee Kagan On Free Speech Issues · · Score: 1

    You seem to be VERY unclear on the concept of "freedom".

  3. Re:Yay, Obama on SCOTUS Nominee Kagan On Free Speech Issues · · Score: 1

    This line about respecting precedent is the foundation of a free society

    FTFY.

  4. Re:Companies don't know on Better Development Through Competition? · · Score: 1
    A famous book from the 80s, "Peoplesoft"

    Hm - do you happen to know who the author of the book was? I'd like to take a look, but I can't find any info on it anywhere; Google, Wikipedia, and Amazon all want to tell me about the company "Peoplesoft", not the book.

  5. Yeah on Why Being Wrong Makes Humans So Smart · · Score: 1

    Susie: "Yeah, that's it. Your grades are low because you're too _smart_ for the class." Calvin: "Believe it, lady. You know how Einstein got bad grades when he was a kid? Well mine are even _worse_!"

  6. Re:Opt-in? on Australian Government May Shelve Internet Filter · · Score: 2, Funny

    Or be opted-in by their wives "for their own sake".

  7. Re:Or you could get an MSCE on Mixed Signs On the State of IT Education · · Score: 1
    A previous employer of mine rejected all resumes listing MCSE certification.

    This sort of "reverse snobbery" really irritates me. It's one thing to say that it's somewhat unfair to reject somebody that doesn't have qualification "X" (a certification, a degree, whatever) without giving them a chance to prove themselves, but it's something else to reject somebody just because they do - but I guess it's a good way to weed out employers that you'd be better off not working for.

    Having an MCSE cert does say something about you, but probably not what you think it does.

    What's that, that you're willing to explore multiple avenues to improve yourself? That you realized that you already knew far more than you needed to know to pass a trivial certification exam, so you went ahead and got it so that potential employers could see that, at a bare minimum, you at least knew that as a starting point, so they didn't have to waste time asking you trivial questions in a job interview?

    I don't have an MCSE, but I do have a couple of Sun Java certifications, because my employer wanted me to get them. And you know something? I actually learned a thing or two in the process.

  8. Re:Sanity? on Obama Will Nominate Elena Kagan To the Supreme Court · · Score: 1

    The simple fact is the article is horribly, ridiculously biased.

    An by "biased", you mean, "not horribly, ridiculously left-wing."

  9. Re:Sanity? on Obama Will Nominate Elena Kagan To the Supreme Court · · Score: 1

    Why Flamebait?

    Because it's not radically left-wing. One thing (one of the many) that democrats can't handle is a critical look at their world views. It looks like reddit users have discovered slashdot. Sigh...

  10. Re:RUN AWAY! RUN AWAY! on Obama Will Nominate Elena Kagan To the Supreme Court · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Modded flaimbait just for setting the record straight... yeah, Slashdot's been "taken over" by "tea party folks", sure.

  11. Re:Let him go. on Wales Supports Purging Porn From Wikipedia · · Score: 1

    so you can speak intelligently with the rest of the adults.

    Ironic that yours is the least intelligent post in this thread - and the least aware of the article.

  12. Re:"too much unnecessary porn" on Wales Supports Purging Porn From Wikipedia · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Only 47? Jeez, dude, what do you do with the other 23 1/2 hours of the day?

  13. Re:Retarded bible belt morons on Pressure Mounts On ICANN To Approve .xxx Domain · · Score: 1

    we can ALL become emotionally and sexually jaded as you are

    Whew! For a minute there I was worried, but fortunately you're around to tell us all how to live our lives and force your irrational beliefs down our throats!

  14. Re:Retarded bible belt morons on Pressure Mounts On ICANN To Approve .xxx Domain · · Score: 1

    Whereas enlightened people such as yourself know that denial of sex is the actual end-goal of life.

  15. Re:Yay ignorance. on Pressure Mounts On ICANN To Approve .xxx Domain · · Score: 1

    And I do believe that requiring porno sites to register under a certain extension would qualify as a violation of freedom of speech.

    So does requiring that TV and radio stations conform to certain arbitrary "moral" standards.

  16. Re:Yay ignorance. on Pressure Mounts On ICANN To Approve .xxx Domain · · Score: 1

    demand that all work/government/public/houses-with-children computers hard-filter out XXX.

    You forgot - all the ISP's will start charging $49.99/month for "basic internet access" - $149.99/month for "unfiltered" internet access.

  17. Re:Yay ignorance. on Pressure Mounts On ICANN To Approve .xxx Domain · · Score: 0, Redundant

    You're wasting your fingers. If anti-porn crusaders could be swayed by logic (or were even capable of comprehending logic), this would have stopped being a debate decades ago.

  18. Re:Yay ignorance. on Pressure Mounts On ICANN To Approve .xxx Domain · · Score: 4, Insightful

    an easy way for me to allow my son to browse the net with little supervision

    Yes, he'd be "protected" from the horrifying, scarring sight of a naked human body. Of course, we'll also need a ".racism", a ".gay", a ".islam", a ".republican" and a ".democrat", a ".atheism", a ".darwinism" and a ".racemixing" TLD to "protect" all the precious little children from all the horrible things that some stupid parents think they're too delicate to absorb.

  19. Re:Given two programmers on Math Skills For Programmers — Necessary Or Not? · · Score: 2, Funny
    The three best programmers I know, who came up with incredibly clever algorithms and got large projects done in amazing ways were all high school dropouts.

    So anecdotally then, should we assume that the best programmers would be those who didn't even make it to high school?

    Susie: "Yeah, that's it. You're too smart for the class."

    Calvin: "Believe it, lady! You know how Einstein got bad grades when he was a kid? Well, mine are even worse!"

  20. Re:Given two programmers on Math Skills For Programmers — Necessary Or Not? · · Score: 2, Funny
    if you can't prove that the code you have written is going to do what you want 100% of the time or its not 100% accurate

    Bah! If it works on my machine, my work is done.

  21. Re:health insurance is like auto insurance now on House Passes Massive Medical Insurance Bill, 219-212 · · Score: 1, Troll

    A few weeks ago, I was talking to a co-worker of mine who grew up in Canada. He told me that he was going door-to-door in high school, selling something or other (I guess they torture kids that way in Canada, too). So he ended up going to the "poor" section of town, where most of the people lived on welfare. He said that when he started knocking on doors, and they opened up, he would peek inside - and the welfare people seemed to have all the same stuff he had. Same video-game consoles, same TV's, same type of furniture... he said he made up his mind then to move to America, where work actually pays off.

    That was, of course, until now. Oh, well. I guess it was nice while it lasted.

  22. Re:Insanity on Court Says Parents Can Block PA "Sexting" Prosecutions · · Score: 1

    You sure as hell *better* interfere with your 18 year old's sex life. Teenagers are stupid fuckers You sure as hell *better* interfere with your 19 year old's sex life. Teenagers are stupid fuckers You sure as hell *better* interfere with your 20 year old's sex life. Early twentiers are stupid fuckers You sure as hell *better* interfere with your 21 year old's sex life. Early twentiers are stupid fuckers You sure as hell *better* interfere with your 22 year old's sex life. Early twentiers are stupid fuckers You sure as hell *better* interfere with your 23 year old's sex life. Early twentiers are stupid fuckers ...

  23. Re:Porn is for Boys, not Men. on Apple Bans Sexy Apps, Developers Upset · · Score: 4, Funny

    You may have fooled the DMV into checking the "M" box on your driver's license application, but I've looked back through your comments. You're definitely a woman.

  24. Re:I'm tired of this "degrading toward women" crap on Apple Bans Sexy Apps, Developers Upset · · Score: 1

    Modded, "-1, Accurate", I see.

  25. Re:This Is Not Censorship At All on Apple Bans Sexy Apps, Developers Upset · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That doesn't make it not censorship, poindexter, that just makes it not unconstitutional. You are capable of comprehending the difference, right?