It's in the TOS - no usey real namey, no get FB. If you break the TOS, you are guilty of unauthorized access to a computer system. Which is a felony. Which is beyond stupid and is one of the reasons I will not visit the US, now or ever - I might get cuffed at the port of entry.
You can eat anything and still maintain a low-calorie diet on a reasonable timescale.
The simplest (not easiest, simplest) way to do this is to fast. You eat, then you don't for a while, then you eat again.
As an experiment, let yourself grow good and hungry before your next meal (I'm not talking about the first pangs here, those disappear in an hour or so, I mean actual hunger). You'd be surprised how long that takes.
It's huge, to be sure. But then you get into the causes of lethal accidents and you realize that it dwindles to insignificance if you're not an asshat (no DUI, no major breaches of traffic laws).
Where are they? Do they come with original autographs? Do you seriously believe Anonymous is exclusively (or, indeed, even primarily) teenagers? Because if you do, I have some very, very bad news for you.
The prosecutor in the case actually posted a terse explanation some time ago to the effect that it IS possible, under Swedish law, as long as the UK also agrees.
One component of one early variant of Stuxnet is also a component of a variant of Flame.
There is no time for people to analyze all the malware anymore. Instead, there are automated detection and signing routines.
When you read about the earliest variants of Stuxnet dating from 2008, that is not the time at which they were written, it is the time when a virus signature was added to a database by someone's detection engines.
So, a particular file was tagged at that time as "virus". No one looked further into it. Whenever something dropped that particular file, the new something was also tagged as "virus" and promptly ignored, because they were rarely seen in the wild. In this manner, a number of components of Stuxnet (and then, Flame) WERE being detected, but no-one connected the dots, as it were, until now.
There cannot be perfect surveillance, for very good theoretical reasons. The only reasonable things you can do are to:
a. make sure the sanes overmatch the loons in numbers in any given community
b. find or make MANY, HIGHLY DISPERSED, EXTREMELY DISCREET and RIDICULOUSLY WELL ARMED new baskets to put one's eggs in.
You correctly observe that technology far surpasses the powers of the human race. Well, all prey has to do is to multiply and run faster than predators.
Slashdot Mirror
It's in the TOS - no usey real namey, no get FB. If you break the TOS, you are guilty of unauthorized access to a computer system. Which is a felony. Which is beyond stupid and is one of the reasons I will not visit the US, now or ever - I might get cuffed at the port of entry.
Okay. Where is the damn archive?
What, it's now against the law to lie about your identity to a company?
Yes, yes it is.
Presumably the Hawking radiation would bleed energy out of the warp, shrinking it. Cosmic friction, what?
Yes, I was rather astonished and alarmed to read the article, which basically states "don't touch it and you'll be fine".
A collection of TEPCO's correspondence with NISA can be found on rather easily on the TEPCO website.
You can eat anything and still maintain a low-calorie diet on a reasonable timescale.
The simplest (not easiest, simplest) way to do this is to fast. You eat, then you don't for a while, then you eat again.
As an experiment, let yourself grow good and hungry before your next meal (I'm not talking about the first pangs here, those disappear in an hour or so, I mean actual hunger). You'd be surprised how long that takes.
It's huge, to be sure. But then you get into the causes of lethal accidents and you realize that it dwindles to insignificance if you're not an asshat (no DUI, no major breaches of traffic laws).
The LHC is that bigger and costlier accelerator. It's being run at way less than nominal power right now.
the cosmological constant, is now the most popular theory to explain the universe's accelerating expansion
describe, not explain
As opposed to, I dunno, say, Martin Luther King, Jr.? Yeah, all of those weapons he was stockpiling sure helped shake things up.
Deacons for Defense and Justice. The Panthers.
And all of those 60s hippies who were so gung ho about engaging in armed conflict really made the difference in stopping the Vietnam War.
Weather Underground.
All of those fundamental shifts in how government has changed were accomplished through non-violent campaigns
3) England didn't have a massive arsenal of modern weaponry to use against the colonists
Yeah, no, you know jack shit about the history of your own country.
You must be the ringleader, then... to know so much about them.
Fuck you and fuck your sig and your dumb shit blog. That is all.
a quarter of a century before any sort of vehicle we have does not require a *licensed* driver to be on-board
Welcome to 2012, esteemed visitor. You will be pleased to know that the Cold War is over and that some of your predictions have come to pass:
http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-17989553
Where are they? Do they come with original autographs? Do you seriously believe Anonymous is exclusively (or, indeed, even primarily) teenagers? Because if you do, I have some very, very bad news for you.
He will be taken to the US, that's the problem. Assange will never get his day in court wrt the rape allegations.
The prosecutor in the case actually posted a terse explanation some time ago to the effect that it IS possible, under Swedish law, as long as the UK also agrees.
http://maddox.xmission.com/ has no ads
Also, there are more free-to-play games which do NOT serve ads than you can shake a stick at.
One component of one early variant of Stuxnet is also a component of a variant of Flame.
There is no time for people to analyze all the malware anymore. Instead, there are automated detection and signing routines.
When you read about the earliest variants of Stuxnet dating from 2008, that is not the time at which they were written, it is the time when a virus signature was added to a database by someone's detection engines.
So, a particular file was tagged at that time as "virus". No one looked further into it. Whenever something dropped that particular file, the new something was also tagged as "virus" and promptly ignored, because they were rarely seen in the wild. In this manner, a number of components of Stuxnet (and then, Flame) WERE being detected, but no-one connected the dots, as it were, until now.
He cashed out.
Protective gear in general should be banned. It only reads to a misguided sense of safety.
I'm pretty sure that just the overall appearance of said appendage is enough to positively ID someone.
Interestingly enough, what you describe is a case of shitty cost accounting.
There cannot be perfect surveillance, for very good theoretical reasons. The only reasonable things you can do are to:
a. make sure the sanes overmatch the loons in numbers in any given community
b. find or make MANY, HIGHLY DISPERSED, EXTREMELY DISCREET and RIDICULOUSLY WELL ARMED new baskets to put one's eggs in.
You correctly observe that technology far surpasses the powers of the human race. Well, all prey has to do is to multiply and run faster than predators.
So, while you are technically correct, you've completely missed the point.
Par for the course, here.