Slashdot Mirror


User: Halvy

Halvy's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
479
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 479

  1. or.. on Dissidents Seeking Anonymous Web Solutions? · · Score: 1

    dont' support your country(s) (arswhole leaders & supporters), but run them out, and stay :)

  2. NO, it is NOT!! on Dissidents Seeking Anonymous Web Solutions? · · Score: 1

    HOWEVER, it would abviously be a danger in the hands of people 'like you', and most agents of the worlds government (who are the ONLY 'REAL' terrorists) :)

  3. yea, but there is hope for the wingeek on Testing Pre-Production Servers Accurately? · · Score: 1

    after all, a 'good' win geek will become a uni geek someday ;)

  4. oooorrrrrrrr on Testing Pre-Production Servers Accurately? · · Score: 1

    you could be considered a 'genius' for saving the it dept oodles of $, and get a raise..and get to play with linux everyday.. and..and.. :)

  5. yea, or maybe the other way around! on Feds Fund Anti-Terrorism Search Engine · · Score: 1
    like, creating 'gun laws' (ie taking away the 2nd amendment) is causing more people to 'stock-up' just incase the pigs (feds, army, etc) come to the door?

    wen are the arswhole (pigs, feds) going to realize that there are more dangerous items that threaten them than 'hand-guns'.. i mean, you can use 'anything' litterely as a weapon.

    but what does the governements usually come down hardest on? those that fight and attack with 'words'..

    why? cuz that is something the governement can 'really-sink-their-teeth-into', whereas, someone who will actually 'fight back', is someone the pigs are toooo 'yellow-bellied' to take on, for fear of a 'real-fight'. :)

  6. Re:Interesting... on Feds Fund Anti-Terrorism Search Engine · · Score: 1
    wot about them? didn't almost every male older enuff to hold one, have one for the war effort? and the quite a few fems too?

    soooo, any law was for who? kids? old people redy to die? it was show only.

    everyone else was part of the war effort and had weapons of some sort (at least those officialy in the army, but i'm assuming many more towards the end wen it was getting close to the zionists wining).

  7. Re:Interesting... on Feds Fund Anti-Terrorism Search Engine · · Score: 1
    yea, there not allowed on planes, so i guess the terrorist will obey that rule the next time their ready to strike.

    all the terrorist need to do is have a couple sexy sluts go in front of them, distrake the arswhole security jerks, and then over power the pigs while their still thinking about porking the sluts.

    maybe your right tho, maybe they should make a law where there are no sexy sluts, or terrorist that can 'over power' pigs at airport security! :)

  8. Re:Worthless on Feds Fund Anti-Terrorism Search Engine · · Score: 1
    aparently you aren't familiar with hackers, joe-citizens, or terrorists. cuz their the ones that out number morons in the nsa. if 'they' (nsa) were soooo smart, and the rest of their counterparts, then how come there weren't any jets waiting to protect ny shitty on 911?

    the answer is...... THERE IS NO 'G O O D' REASON!! PERIOD!!!

    it is obvious that the same mentality that played out prior to detonating the 'First Atomic Bomb' (ie. scientist for the usa were not sure if the test wouldn't end man-kind), played out on 911.

    the only problem is, these governement (Machiavellian scumbags) have underestimated the power of God, via both the masses and the goodness of individuals who are not going to stand by and let the bushes of the world --- destroy it.

  9. Re:I don't quite get it on Feds Fund Anti-Terrorism Search Engine · · Score: 1
    yea well that law (Patriot Act)is 'illegal' and anyone who supports or abides by it is commiting a crime against humanity.

    soooo, the choices for us are such;

    'brake' the illegal law on such a 'collective-MASS-scale that it becomes voided (where it is not feasable for the feds to put so many people in jail),

    or as indiviguals, go to jail for 'violating' the illegal law, and when things are finished 'going down', come out of jail a hero with a sense of pride AND freedom and power over the scum (ie.bush and the rest of the morons who think they 'rule-the-earth') who enacted; The Patriot Act'.

  10. Re:I don't quite get it on Feds Fund Anti-Terrorism Search Engine · · Score: 1
    actually you dont' give the government 'enough' credit here..

    what they really are doing, is trying to 'scare' the terrorist, so they don't communicate in public anymore...

    then the poor terrorist will have to resort to some new unheard of ways-and-means of communicating like a cafe' in france, or 258k ssh (encryption)

    then 'the pigs' can claim how they are fighting terrorists and suceeding, using our trillions of dollars (and euros), using only bluff-bluster--- and oh yea, 'duct tape' :)

  11. Re:defending points of weakness on Feds Fund Anti-Terrorism Search Engine · · Score: 1
    ohhhh, like the government(s) of the world (even with their armies) are going to beat (to the punch) 6.5 billions 'potential' terrorists with this (so called) new data mining?

    if the data is there already, and now is going to be possible to be mined (better) for terrorist (or for preventing terrorits) activities, how can anyone expect the (so called) good guys, to beat the (so called) bad guys to the punch with this data?

    seems to me if the gov was to truly have something like this, they would keep it to themselvs and try to catch terrorists instead.

    but instead what we have here is classic 'Machiavellian ' type government double-speak. in other words, the government is trying their hardest to show how stupid and bad they are, because that is both easier to do (than trying to be good, or right about things) and it instills more fear in the masses because we all think;" oh my God, these imbasils are in charge of nukes!!"

  12. Re:The mideast matters on Feds Fund Anti-Terrorism Search Engine · · Score: 1
    the reason is the same as the reason the usa couldn't win wwII without 'threatening' to wipe-out a whole race of people;

    the same reason the usa 'ran-with-their-tales-between-their-legs' when the chinx stood up to the usa in n. korea in the '50's;

    the same reason the usa made complete (deadly) fools of themselfs in vietnam (obliterating villages and people--- in order 'save them');

    and now of course iraq...

    but this may prove to be the last time that the 'powers-that-be' use their weapondry as 'penis-extentions'. 'The Isurgentcy' is just a taste of what is to come to 'The Beast'.

    because bush has his foot deep down his lieing throat, we are ALL asured to get a good sense of justice when the newly trained iraqi army turns it's bright shiny new weapons on the U.S. troops :)

  13. who said "we" didn't like communism? on Feds Fund Anti-Terrorism Search Engine · · Score: 1
    they arn't 'resorting' to using computers..in lieu of anything, because they dont' have any brains to start out with.

    remember--- they can't EVEN 'connect dots' from 911, that a third grader could have-- given the same data.

    but then again, even if they (government) are more dangerous than smart, i still say they worship the god of 'machiavelli' more than even money.

  14. ok 'Pops'.. on Winelib Hobbled by Exception-Handling Patent · · Score: 1
    whatever you say man. i never said i had a gripe with borland. but if they wanted to 'do something' to help oss, then they could have aleady. any nugding by 'the community' is normal.

    as far as teh barbarians are concerned, they are the accendents of the germany we all know and love from wwII..sooooo, i suspect that i know which side my 'bread is buttered on', next time teh &^%#%* hits the fan. :)

  15. Nice try (not) on Winelib Hobbled by Exception-Handling Patent · · Score: 1
    you forgot to mention that the 'Barbarians' WON!

    and they won because they played as rough or ruffer than the romans, and because the romans were 'past' the 'tipping' point of destruction

    i believe companies and organization like macromedia, m$ and the riaa are past the 'tipping' point also, and that is why THEY are the ones acting like the barbarians (sorry Barbarians for making you look so bad!!) ;)

  16. Re:Solution: on Winelib Hobbled by Exception-Handling Patent · · Score: 1

    hear here!! 3 cheers for men on white horses!! :)

  17. Re:Stupid software patents on Winelib Hobbled by Exception-Handling Patent · · Score: 1
    there are NO 'stupid' software patents only DANGEROUS ones!

    your example of "the dog is big" reminded me how the beast (machine, corporate pigs, etc.. whatever you call them) are planing for the day, when EVERYTHING will be 'patented' or outlawed, so that 'they' will have us all completely controled...

    the ONLY way around this is with civil disobedience (breaking 'illegal' laws and rules) until the scum give up, or we bring them judgement.

    as far as m$ or borland is concerned, the same applys.. lets just 'use' the wine program or any other software that we deem necessary-- in ANY way 'we' see fit, in spite of the coporate criminals cries & playing of the 'boo game' with everyone (eg riaa).

  18. Re:Ugly workaround? on Winelib Hobbled by Exception-Handling Patent · · Score: 1
    you can't 'USE' windows!!

    unless you meant of course, to wrap your fish in!!(which i wouldn't trust it for that even)!! :)

  19. Re:We should on Paul Graham: Hiring is Obsolete · · Score: 1
    the 'powers that be' THINK they can abort the world someday (with nukes)--- if 'WE' dont' accept 'their' brand of freedom, but GOD will NOT let them :)

    they will however undoubtedly create quite a bit of caos and killings if/when they get the chance to sling at least a few nukes before God steps in.

    after all, we are stewards only, it is HIS earth however.

  20. How about aborting you?! on Paul Graham: Hiring is Obsolete · · Score: 1
    yea, sounds good, eh?

    that will help with your concern with population control. Better yet, 'kill yourself' and save us (the taxpayers) money of 'bringing you to justice'.

    and yes indeed 'america' has spoken, and she wants people 'like you' (anti-Christs), who sit in the front pews at church on sunday, to start paying more & more, & more, & more of your savings and income, so the people you helped make poor-- can get stronger in order to bring 'justice' to anti-Christs like you!!

  21. The Article DOES say something new! on Paul Graham: Hiring is Obsolete · · Score: 1

    or at least something that is not emphasized enough (lately). i'v previousely mentioned above something most people don't know, realize or want to admit in slashdot comment: http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=149177&cid= 12506398.

    Paul Graham's concept-- although obviously not 'completely new', is an 'improved' view on what can be done for-- not only 'undergrads', but actually 'ANYONE' in the work force.

    And thaaaaat is, take the 'entrepreneur' spirit-- 'TO THE MAX', by whatever means necessary in order to 'slay the beasts' (captitalism & commie-ism), which has left the world on the brink of kaos!!!

    In other words, lets do away with corporations (and dare I say governments?), since these two concepts have only favored a 'chosen' few, at the expense (and literal death) of billions of people.

  22. who said "we" didn't like communism? on Paul Graham: Hiring is Obsolete · · Score: 1

    i'll tell you who, the 'capitalists' did!

    after all, like 1984, we HAVE to have an enemy, ahhhnnd, when you think about it, there is VERY little difference between the two (commies and capitalists).. because both systems tend to congrigate the power and wealth around a VERY few chosen people, with everyone else chasing their tales their whole lifes.

    Capitalist just seem better at 'holding the carrot out' to the average poor slob, making him think he will get someware if he 'trys' harder. Of course if i was in a commie country, i'd probably think communism was better at holding the carrot out to us.

    the key seems to be the same one for most other problems us earthinks face.. and that is, unless we start 'thinking and doing alike', on a mass scale, for the good of the world and civilization, then it will be very hard to change things whether you are an 'undergraduate' or a President...

    This 'one-world-system' that has been 'forced' upon us the last 20 years or so will need to be 'dealt with' as well.

  23. Re:and that's exactly the wrong attitude on Desktop Linux Usage Statistics · · Score: 1

    people like you deserve windoze

    the 'zealots' in linux serve a great purpose; they preach to the decent people out there that there is (finally) an alternative to m$.

    linux (and the other nixs) may be a challenge (sometimes), but you can ALWAYS fix the sys the way you want..

    wereas, with ms, you have to wait for bill gates to fix problems with his fraudulant os.

  24. Re:good luck on Desktop Linux Usage Statistics · · Score: 1

    This Anonymous Coward = bill gates jr.

    Does anyone else remember when bill made the following comments:

    "..noone will ever need more than 256k memory.."

    during the release of windoze 2000 (i think), while on stage, the piece-o-crap crashed upon trying to boot. billies reply? " these things happen..". maybe he waz trying to break-us-in on what to expect from this fraudulant os.

    more recently: "..linux is a form of communism..".

    of course i'm paraphrasing mostly. but how can the newspapers, etc still quote this criminal every time he makes a prediction!?

    It is bill gates's (proven) criminal deeds that immitates communism with it's monopolistic destruction of our economies.

  25. Re:Linux on the desktop ain't gonna happen until.. on Desktop Linux Usage Statistics · · Score: 1

    that was GREAT!! you shudda got a 5+ mod! ;)