Maybe it's because things were changed after they signed up for an account? Without their permission? In order to cross promote a product no one wants?
Yep, it's time for Google to go away. I've already stopped using google search because they pushed too far. Gmail is next on the chopping block if they don't cut it out.
The sad thing, that this post glosses over, is the current school system educates better than any time in U.S. history. It's just the rest of the world doing even better that.
Nope. Harassment and malicious litigation aren't terrorism. Nobody's afraid that these people in Wisconsin are going to kill them.
-jcr
Playing devil's advocate again, since people I'd agree with are making so many dumb assertions in this thread, but "harassment and malicious litigation" get called terrorism every time the RIAA or patent trolls are involved.
Well, no, even though I think the charge of "atheist terrorism" is incredibly moronic, Stalin did have a quite official anti-religion position, stemming, quite directly, from Marx and his "opiate of the masses" assertion.
Considering the demographics on slashdot, I'm going to take a shot in the dark: caffeine and other stimulants have been noted to have uncommon side-effects in ADHD diagnosed population. Could that be you?
A lot of those are bad, but they tend to be of the sort, very widely, of "regulation wasn't happening anymore," which is a farcry from your conspiratorial allegation that it's a "money making scheme".
Well, that does require some basic understanding of the financial tools involved. I could see a serious argument from a behavioralist perspective that that's wrong. But I'd be incredulous of any such argument.
Oops, it looks like your agreeing politely with another poster on the internet is "flamebait." I mean, I try not to get too tied up in how people moderate me, but there really is a kind of paranoid delusion of oppression from people in column A, that they fight with whatever power they happen to have.
You've got 3 schools of criticism there. In order of frequency, A. Vaguely conspiratorial accusations centering around the fed and/or federal government(but never states, oddly) that are completely unhelpful. Typical quote: "Quantitative easing is stealing money" B. Austrian school whining about Chicago school being the de facto source of understanding. Typical quote: "But our assumptions say all regulation is bad." C. Actual scholars and sane economists highly detailed concerns about specific courses of action within one department they're familiar with, that usually reflect incremental improvements on economic planning. Typical quote: [actually the media never covers this sort of thing, except, oddly, the Volcker rule]
Indeed, I've found that to be the logical conclusion of my premise as well, but it doesn't sit well with the neoclassicalists, so I thought I'd let the premise stand on its own.
Nah, you can have survival economies before population levels reach concentrations that require modern agriculture. I'm not advocating that as a superior alternative(it sucks), but it is an alternative that doesn't require trusting interactions with others to continue.
The US government makes no such promise, and investors know it. Slow, long-term inflation is part of the instability prevention plans of most currency issuing nations.
Normally, I'd like a sarcastic oblique reference to the french revolution, guillotines or the like, but knowing how some people are about the cars, I'd genuinely worry someone would try to kill this poor fool.
Slashdot Mirror
How about I demand my personal information back? Oh wait, you can't do that, they've sold it to everyone already.
Maybe it's because things were changed after they signed up for an account? Without their permission? In order to cross promote a product no one wants?
A color that varies, can be measured, and understood scientifically, without allowing the fact that it's currently blue tell me it's never red.
Yep, it's time for Google to go away. I've already stopped using google search because they pushed too far. Gmail is next on the chopping block if they don't cut it out.
Precedence has no bearing on sentencing
--anonymous coward, legal expert
The sad thing, that this post glosses over, is the current school system educates better than any time in U.S. history. It's just the rest of the world doing even better that.
Recurring record high temperatures are real, substantive evidence, you half-wit.
And while people do say all those things, none of them are the official position of a major political party in the U.S.
Nope. Harassment and malicious litigation aren't terrorism. Nobody's afraid that these people in Wisconsin are going to kill them.
-jcr
Playing devil's advocate again, since people I'd agree with are making so many dumb assertions in this thread, but "harassment and malicious litigation" get called terrorism every time the RIAA or patent trolls are involved.
Well, no, even though I think the charge of "atheist terrorism" is incredibly moronic, Stalin did have a quite official anti-religion position, stemming, quite directly, from Marx and his "opiate of the masses" assertion.
Considering the demographics on slashdot, I'm going to take a shot in the dark: caffeine and other stimulants have been noted to have uncommon side-effects in ADHD diagnosed population. Could that be you?
No, I'm not asking anyone to make it go away. Just trying to account for things is better than ignoring them.
Oh come on, it was clearly commentary on how polar opposite of "flamebait" that particular post was.
"conspiratorial" and "money making scheme" are your loaded words not mine.
Nuh-uh!
A lot of those are bad, but they tend to be of the sort, very widely, of "regulation wasn't happening anymore," which is a farcry from your conspiratorial allegation that it's a "money making scheme".
Another A:
Vaguely conspiratorial accusations centering around the fed and/or federal government(but never states, oddly) that are completely unhelpful
Come on, give me a non-vague demonstration of your point. At all.
Well, that does require some basic understanding of the financial tools involved. I could see a serious argument from a behavioralist perspective that that's wrong. But I'd be incredulous of any such argument.
Oops, it looks like your agreeing politely with another poster on the internet is "flamebait." I mean, I try not to get too tied up in how people moderate me, but there really is a kind of paranoid delusion of oppression from people in column A, that they fight with whatever power they happen to have.
And we have a little bit of column A from my post below as real-world sample.
You've got 3 schools of criticism there. In order of frequency,
A. Vaguely conspiratorial accusations centering around the fed and/or federal government(but never states, oddly) that are completely unhelpful. Typical quote: "Quantitative easing is stealing money"
B. Austrian school whining about Chicago school being the de facto source of understanding. Typical quote: "But our assumptions say all regulation is bad."
C. Actual scholars and sane economists highly detailed concerns about specific courses of action within one department they're familiar with, that usually reflect incremental improvements on economic planning. Typical quote: [actually the media never covers this sort of thing, except, oddly, the Volcker rule]
Indeed, I've found that to be the logical conclusion of my premise as well, but it doesn't sit well with the neoclassicalists, so I thought I'd let the premise stand on its own.
Nah, you can have survival economies before population levels reach concentrations that require modern agriculture. I'm not advocating that as a superior alternative(it sucks), but it is an alternative that doesn't require trusting interactions with others to continue.
Alternative phrasing, modern post-industrial economies always depend on you dealing with other people, some of whom will benefit from screwing you.
The US government makes no such promise, and investors know it. Slow, long-term inflation is part of the instability prevention plans of most currency issuing nations.
Normally, I'd like a sarcastic oblique reference to the french revolution, guillotines or the like, but knowing how some people are about the cars, I'd genuinely worry someone would try to kill this poor fool.