Oh, yes, it's not like any program is ever dealt with on the user level, with multiple interactions along the way. Literally everything is a shell script. I had forgotten.
As to what programs, any number of web apps are an easy example. I forget what slashdot uses as it's message, but when I'm done and hit submit, I'll see an informative message.
See, it makes your point diluted that we have to determine you're being sarcastic from information we don't actually possess(the story of your own town and providers). It isn't until the end of your rant that we get the first obviously contrary information, and it hurts the pacing of your comment. I'm the last person in the world who should be providing writing advice, but it really hurt your joke this time.
It's not hard: shooting people in theaters because you are mentally disturbed makes you a horrible monster. Shooting people in theaters for doing something that annoys you makes you a hero.
Which is why we'd like the ability to persist the arrangement we originally agreed to, and not need to go to measures like building a doomsday device, burying it deep beneath google's headquarters and issuing anonymous ultimatums.
I've always wondered why we can't do simple infrared or ultraviolet examinations of things with our smart phones.
I have a sneaky suspicion it's because not all clothing is opaque in those spectra, but I like neat science toys, and wish my phone was a little more tricorderish.
Slashdot Mirror
Not in the same way or degree, at least.
Oh, yes, it's not like any program is ever dealt with on the user level, with multiple interactions along the way. Literally everything is a shell script. I had forgotten.
As to what programs, any number of web apps are an easy example. I forget what slashdot uses as it's message, but when I'm done and hit submit, I'll see an informative message.
"More terrible" implies terrible in the first place, right? That was an intended point. Did it not make it?
That is another way to look at it. I think that's a fair point.
See, it makes your point diluted that we have to determine you're being sarcastic from information we don't actually possess(the story of your own town and providers). It isn't until the end of your rant that we get the first obviously contrary information, and it hurts the pacing of your comment. I'm the last person in the world who should be providing writing advice, but it really hurt your joke this time.
smallwebsite.ext cannot be found. Please verify you have bribed your ISP to allow access, and that you have typed the domain correctly.
If you are still having trouble, try being a larger corporation again later.
"Oh my GOD, how inconsiderate! I can't see the damn advertisement over your conversation with your loved ones."
It does make the shooter seem more terrible, with that bit of context.
"Operation successful" is a common and useful message that doesn't meet your rule.
What year in the U.S. has the most value of manufactured goods?
Manufacturing jobs have no bearing on amount of manufacturing.
It's not hard: shooting people in theaters because you are mentally disturbed makes you a horrible monster. Shooting people in theaters for doing something that annoys you makes you a hero.
I wish I could say that this was 100% sarcasm.
Yes, but those people "getting what they deserve" also keeps the company afloat and lets their ill-gotten hoard of IPs sit locked away forever.
Not jobs, just the facilities. We've got robots!
And they say "Great content keeps users" but things like buzzfeed prove how stupid that argument is.
That analogy is exactly the same on Hitler used, you nazi.
But I waaaaaaaaaaaaaant it. These practical constraints are no fair!
No, his summary is accurate. Maybe you didn't read what you wrote?
Would it really be that much more than an RGB filter?
You've clearly been dating the wrong women.
Which is why we'd like the ability to persist the arrangement we originally agreed to, and not need to go to measures like building a doomsday device, burying it deep beneath google's headquarters and issuing anonymous ultimatums.
You don't like the sun?
And no, I don't care the CMS form doesn't work, because that section of the site is only for some friends.
Actually, you'll find that form doesn't work. Good luck finding the actual functioning email address on that domain too.
I've always wondered why we can't do simple infrared or ultraviolet examinations of things with our smart phones.
I have a sneaky suspicion it's because not all clothing is opaque in those spectra, but I like neat science toys, and wish my phone was a little more tricorderish.
That sure is the justification I'd use if I were terrible, and actively trying to squeeze as much money as possible out of spying on people.
That's not what I said, thus the rest of your post is irrelevant.
There's a real difference, among the neuro-active community between "recurring pattern of record breaking" and "hot today".