The data cited in the article and summary say otherwise. To wit:
levels as low as.05 have been associated with significantly increased risk of fatal crashes
Re:multiple social providers on the desktop
on
Firefox 21 Arrives
·
· Score: 1
Sort of? It looks like it's automatically supported plug-ins you have to activate from the relevant web-page. You wouldn't see them unless you said "activate it" or whatever dumb link exists on the page.
North Carolina has gone through some of the most awful gerrymandering in U.S. history in 2010, essentially letting the republican party have a super-majority of power in NC with either a scant plurality or outright minority of votes(depending on which election you're talking about).
They have been on a constant steamroll of attacking anything they imagine to be liberal through legislation. Electric cars are one of those things. The majority of North Carolinians don't even support this trash.
Yes, that's all it takes. Politicians are terrified of direct blame. Indirect blame that can be shifted to "those other guys" or denied is fine in droves, but anything that seems like "You did X then somewhat related Y happened" is terrifying to them. Anyone who can leverage that: "You made [local sports team] leave" or "You shut down toxic waste dumping co." has complete control and can play the brinksmanship game as much as they please.
Except it won't be on public television, it'll be on Fox. There's a good chance any principle will be sacrificed before the first season is finished filming for spectacle. Gotta sell those commercial time slots.
You need to fix the problems with elections themselves. Safe districts make easily manipulated legislators not just in bed with lobbyists but married to them for decades.
Any of the following would work: Increasing the number of representatives in the house by a factor of ~100 Defining a countrywide party agnostic algorithm for automatically creating districts Moving to proportional representation(this one would also fix the 2 party problem).
There are lots of other approaches, I'd support yours, if it dealt with this problem. Just support some kind of fix.
This is a phenomenon known as a Garden path sentence. The phrasing leads you to believe that windows is a singular noun, when it is in fact a plural noun with a different meaning. For anyone still confused: these are the windows to merge changes into source-control before release.
That... doesn't seem to be true. I couldn't actually find that explicitly spelled out at all. Which article are you referring to, and are you just referring to the
over and above associations with intelligence, education, and socioeconomic status in childhood.
Because that doesn't necessarily refer to controls.
I'm glad I could maintain transparency. I never intended to disguise my beliefs, though you certainly are willing to ascribe malice to them.
I don't know what bearing that has on anything other than you making extraordinary and crass assumptions about large groups of people to feel better about yourself.
Yeah, the most annoying thing about discussions about intelligence is that everyone just assumes that Intelligence = F(x), then argue for an hour about what x is. The obvious reality that bypasses this whole argument is that Intelligence=F(x,y,z,m,n,a,b,c,d,e,f,g...), and that success is another function G(F(x),a,b,c,d,e,g...).
As a programmer, I fully expect to be rightfully chastised for any string literal I mistype, even if the mistake was a typo I didn't make when relevant. Enclosing something in quotes magically makes the importance of spelling increase 10fold.
At risk of sounding like I'm against education, I have to ask: Who cares about educational programming?
Me? I like informative content. I don't care that other people don't, I just care that I can't get any.
Remember TechTV? That was educational, for adults, and fun. Remember old discovery channel? Fascinating stuff. Now if I watched the descendants of either of those channels, I'd be lucky if I didn't know less than I started knowing.
Why they're doing it is there's enough talk about intelligent cars now that there's room for "new technology" to get easy marketing. An existing standard doesn't matter when you can make your technology the de-facto standard by market manipulation.
What really bothers me is the "IMax" symbol at the end of the preview which suggests this anti-knowledge will be shown at science museums. Incredible cultural poison.
I'm sorry you enjoy your monopolist sporting events so much. I prefer my escapism a little less tedious.
I'm not sure what conspiracy theory I espoused to justify the "ten foil hat," so I'm going to assume that you're just in the habit of projecting every criticism ever tossed your way onto everyone you talk to.
If you shouldn't have to prove who you are, neither should the person applying for a loan under your name. They're innocent too. I get where you're coming from, and I don't support this legislation. But I don't view it as an abusive disaster. Just less than ideal. I won't be making my voting decision based on what my representative does to this bill.
Yeah, yeah, steady erosion of rights, I know. That matters, but if you cry wolf for every piece of legislation, legislators just stop caring and it gets worse.
Slashdot Mirror
A should hasten to add that this is true only in as much as the limit is concerned. At the actual precise north pole, the value of east is 0/0.
A quick bit of projection math tells me the value of east is the set of all angles when you're at the north pole.
The data cited in the article and summary say otherwise. To wit:
Sort of? It looks like it's automatically supported plug-ins you have to activate from the relevant web-page. You wouldn't see them unless you said "activate it" or whatever dumb link exists on the page.
All it really does is tell the zombies in the game(and, yes, every game these days has zombies) where to find your brain.
I don't have any social features in my firefox. What? Do you just install every plugin every website you visit suggests to you?
North Carolina has gone through some of the most awful gerrymandering in U.S. history in 2010, essentially letting the republican party have a super-majority of power in NC with either a scant plurality or outright minority of votes(depending on which election you're talking about).
They have been on a constant steamroll of attacking anything they imagine to be liberal through legislation. Electric cars are one of those things. The majority of North Carolinians don't even support this trash.
Yes, that's all it takes. Politicians are terrified of direct blame. Indirect blame that can be shifted to "those other guys" or denied is fine in droves, but anything that seems like "You did X then somewhat related Y happened" is terrifying to them. Anyone who can leverage that: "You made [local sports team] leave" or "You shut down toxic waste dumping co." has complete control and can play the brinksmanship game as much as they please.
Except it won't be on public television, it'll be on Fox. There's a good chance any principle will be sacrificed before the first season is finished filming for spectacle. Gotta sell those commercial time slots.
You need to fix the problems with elections themselves. Safe districts make easily manipulated legislators not just in bed with lobbyists but married to them for decades.
Any of the following would work:
Increasing the number of representatives in the house by a factor of ~100
Defining a countrywide party agnostic algorithm for automatically creating districts
Moving to proportional representation(this one would also fix the 2 party problem).
There are lots of other approaches, I'd support yours, if it dealt with this problem. Just support some kind of fix.
This is a phenomenon known as a Garden path sentence. The phrasing leads you to believe that windows is a singular noun, when it is in fact a plural noun with a different meaning. For anyone still confused: these are the windows to merge changes into source-control before release.
That... doesn't seem to be true. I couldn't actually find that explicitly spelled out at all. Which article are you referring to, and are you just referring to the
Because that doesn't necessarily refer to controls.
I'm glad I could maintain transparency. I never intended to disguise my beliefs, though you certainly are willing to ascribe malice to them.
I don't know what bearing that has on anything other than you making extraordinary and crass assumptions about large groups of people to feel better about yourself.
Yeah, the most annoying thing about discussions about intelligence is that everyone just assumes that Intelligence = F(x), then argue for an hour about what x is. The obvious reality that bypasses this whole argument is that Intelligence=F(x,y,z,m,n,a,b,c,d,e,f,g...), and that success is another function G(F(x),a,b,c,d,e,g...).
As a programmer, I fully expect to be rightfully chastised for any string literal I mistype, even if the mistake was a typo I didn't make when relevant. Enclosing something in quotes magically makes the importance of spelling increase 10fold.
You seem like a cool person.
At risk of sounding like I'm against education, I have to ask: Who cares about educational programming?
Me? I like informative content. I don't care that other people don't, I just care that I can't get any.
Remember TechTV? That was educational, for adults, and fun. Remember old discovery channel? Fascinating stuff. Now if I watched the descendants of either of those channels, I'd be lucky if I didn't know less than I started knowing.
Oh, well the truth is I got as far as "contr" before finding nothing(save for the one reference).
Open articles.
Ctrl-F "Controling"
No results.
Close tab.
Nothing of value.
(They did start another study for control for genetic factors, but those aren't the most important)
Why they're doing it is there's enough talk about intelligent cars now that there's room for "new technology" to get easy marketing. An existing standard doesn't matter when you can make your technology the de-facto standard by market manipulation.
Projecting... or living in Boston.
What really bothers me is the "IMax" symbol at the end of the preview which suggests this anti-knowledge will be shown at science museums. Incredible cultural poison.
Sorry, I didn't respond to your first reply. I didn't need a citation, I believe you. That distinction was just totally not clear from context.
I'm sorry you enjoy your monopolist sporting events so much. I prefer my escapism a little less tedious.
I'm not sure what conspiracy theory I espoused to justify the "ten foil hat," so I'm going to assume that you're just in the habit of projecting every criticism ever tossed your way onto everyone you talk to.
If you shouldn't have to prove who you are, neither should the person applying for a loan under your name. They're innocent too. I get where you're coming from, and I don't support this legislation. But I don't view it as an abusive disaster. Just less than ideal. I won't be making my voting decision based on what my representative does to this bill.
Yeah, yeah, steady erosion of rights, I know. That matters, but if you cry wolf for every piece of legislation, legislators just stop caring and it gets worse.