Slashdot Mirror


Cosmos Remake Coming To Fox In 2014

TheSync writes "The long-awaited remake of Carl Sagan's amazing Cosmos series, Cosmos: A Space-Time Odyssey, will be coming to Fox television next year. It will star astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson. Surprisingly, Seth MacFarlane of Family Guy fame is an executive producer. MacFarlane was introduced to Carl Sagan's widow Ann Druyan by deGrasse Tyson, and MacFarlane helped them pitch the show to Fox executives."

193 comments

  1. Let me guess by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 5, Funny

    In the Fox version the Universe is 6000 years old and the Earth is at the center of the Universe.

    1. Re:Let me guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Carl Sagan show without Carl Sagan? What's the point in that?

    2. Re:Let me guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Let me guess you like to make fun of people and take lollipops from children? Grow up bully. /sarcasm Considering the people involved with the show I doubt that... But go ahead keep your narrow minded views flowing... We all want to hear about them.

      No being fox it will go 9 shows they will cancel it and then there will be a 'cult following' and petitions to bring it back.

    3. Re:Let me guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was just about to comment the same thing!

    4. Re:Let me guess by fche · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's cheaper to remake than to rerun?

    5. Re:Let me guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the Fox version the Universe is 6000 years old and the Earth is at the center of the Universe.

      We can, actually, choose the center of the Universe to be anywhere.
      http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/GR/centre.html

    6. Re:Let me guess by T.E.D. · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Think of it as a Neil deGrasse Tyson show done a bit in the style of Carl Sagan's Cosmos.

      The guy is so enthusiastic and charasmatic that he's a regular vistor on the late-night talk show circuit, and I believe currently holds the record for the most guest appearances on Colbert. He has 1.2 million followers on twitter. I think he's got what it takes to pull this off.

    7. Re:Let me guess by Black+LED · · Score: 1

      I agree. Neil deGrasse Tyson is probably the only person who could pull it off. Maybe Michio Kaku, but I don't think he quite has the speaking ability that Neil does.

    8. Re: Let me guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      First, Fox (aside from the news side) doesn't just cater to conservatives- far from it.

      Second, not all conservative are young earthers. There are many of s who believe in God and believe in evolution.

      Third, if you are going to troll, be funny next time. Funny trolls are awesome. You? Not so much.

    9. Re:Let me guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meh. Neil deGrasse Tyson is a great speaker when he's simply allowed to talk. But in scripted documentaries he's a bit of a bore. (Mostly because of the small amounts of writing interspersed with copious amounts of unnecessary background.)

    10. Re:Let me guess by Anonymous+Meoward · · Score: 1

      Nah, it'll just be subtitled: When Celestial Bodies Attack!

      --
      --- The American Way of Life is not a birthright. Hell, it's not even sustainable.
    11. Re:Let me guess by cyberchondriac · · Score: 2

      Maybe it's cheaper to remake than to rerun?

      That's silly. My guess?- they want to make use of today's CGI capabilities. All the cosmology based shows these days are CGI heavy, partly to aid in illustrating the concepts, I'm sure, but also to grab the attention of the young crowd and pique their interest in the field.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    12. Re:Let me guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was thinking, "How would baby Jesus help this show?"

    13. Re:Let me guess by MitchDev · · Score: 0

      And the T-Rex is a Jesus-o-saurus

    14. Re:Let me guess by TWiTfan · · Score: 1

      There is no way Fox is cancelling COPS and launching Cosmos. Expect the execs there to come to their senses pretty quickly and replace this with a reality show following the lives of transsexual meth-addicted circus performers.

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
    15. Re:Let me guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Also Kaku would be guaranteed to say "we know string theory must be true". It's sort of one of his hobbies to do so.

    16. Re:Let me guess by Dutchy+Wutchy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Michio Kaku sounds a lot like a crackpot on the subject of aliens/UFOs, and his anti-nuclear soundbites seemed irresponsible--or at least quite misleading.

    17. Re:Let me guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I agree. Neil deGrasse Tyson is probably the only person who could pull it off. Maybe Michio Kaku, but I don't think he quite has the speaking ability that Neil does.

      If you want pseudo science then yes professor Michio Kaku is a good choice.
      Otherwise Neil deGrasse Tyson is the right choice, science not time travel and wormholes.

    18. Re:Let me guess by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      Probably to update all the outdated and wrong information.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    19. Re:Let me guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The could do a CGI Carl Sagan... ;-)

    20. Re:Let me guess by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

      And the T-Rex is a Jesus-o-saurus

      don't be silly hes riding a t-rex

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    21. Re:Let me guess by SirGarlon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The original show is far out of date. I watched a couple of episodes a few years ago. The visual effects were dated of course, but a lot of the science had gaps as well. When the original Cosmos was produced, the Hubble Space Telescope had not been launched. Exoplanets had not been discovered. The universe was known to be expanding but its rate of expansion was presumed to be decreasing, not increasing. The source of gamma-ray bursts had not been identified. We knew a lot less about black holes. I don't think dark matter was considered important. And, back then, Pluto was a planet. ;-) (Sorry, couldn't resist!)

      All that is just off the top of my head. Astrophysics has really advanced since 1980.

      --
      [Sir Garlon] is the marvellest knight that is now living, for he destroyeth many good knights, for he goeth invisible.
    22. Re:Let me guess by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 1

      And run back to back with moon landing conspiracy shows...

      --
      Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
    23. Re:Let me guess by rasmusbr · · Score: 1

      Here's an early preview... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v91m_F2NhfU

    24. Re:Let me guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no way Fox is cancelling COPS and launching Cosmos. Expect the execs there to come to their senses pretty quickly and replace this with a reality show following the lives of transsexual meth-addicted circus performers.

      No, that one will be on Discovery, replacing thair last non-idiotic show, MythBusters.

    25. Re:Let me guess by gravis777 · · Score: 1

      You shouldn't confuse Fox News with the Fox Network. I think the two exist so that they can make their own news stories on slow news days.

    26. Re:Let me guess by argStyopa · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      As opposed to the other mainstream media, who merely assume that the climate of a 5-billion-year-old planet will be catastrophically ruined by driving SUVs, and that the root of every bad thing that's happened in history can be pinned to blame some white guy, somewhere (after 1776, it would be an AMERICAN white guy).

      Hey, we all have our preconceptions, right?

      --
      -Styopa
    27. Re:Let me guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it's cheaper to remake than to rerun?

      I very highly doubt that a PBS mini-series, even perhaps one of the greatest scientific mini-series produced to date, is at all expensive to rerun.

    28. Re:Let me guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They may bring in opposing views, like some bleached blonde saying there are dozens and dozens of zodiac signs by which to run your life.

    29. Re:Let me guess by gmuslera · · Score: 1

      It will have Carl Sagan. After the success of The Walking Dead, they are doing their own version: The Talking Dead.

    30. Re:Let me guess by wagnerrp · · Score: 1

      I thought those ran on the Discovery and History channels.

    31. Re:Let me guess by cyberchondriac · · Score: 5, Funny

      lol.. that would take Billions upon Billions of pixels!

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    32. Re:Let me guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I love Tyson... They should have gotten Hugo Weaving.

    33. Re:Let me guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and that the root of every bad thing that's happened in history can be pinned to blame some white guy, somewhere (after 1776, it would be an AMERICAN white guy).

      And giving the startling amount of shit American White Guys are responsible for, many of us wouldn't entirely disagree.

    34. Re:Let me guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Theoretical physics is not "pseudoscience". And NdGT has talked about both time travel and wormholes on his Star Talk podcast (which I highly recommend).

    35. Re:Let me guess by Pino+Grigio · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There's also been quite a lot of new physics and cosmology since 1980. We have Hubble. We have the CMB. We have all kinds of other interesting things...! Tyson is perfect for this. His enthusiasm is infectious (if you've listened to any of his audio books).

    36. Re:Let me guess by Warbothong · · Score: 3, Informative

      Astrophysics has really advanced since 1980.

      True, and the show also covered much more than Astrophysics. For example its claims that the brain operates using symbolic logic seem dated, since these days we would say the brain is more about statistics. It also covered evolutionary biology and microbiology, fields which have progressed tremendously in recent decades.

      I suppose that's the problem when one tries to cover such a broad subject as the Cosmos ;)

    37. Re: Let me guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heck, I know more than a few conservative atheists.

    38. Re:Let me guess by Omestes · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Kaku doesn't really strike me as credible. I'm sure he's a good scientist, but he does too many "time travel wormhole star trek is cool!" pop-sci things to really let me trust him. Tyson reminds me of Sagan, smart and doesn't feel the need to dress things up to sell to the lay audience. Kaku is like Bill Nye, science for people who hate science. Tyson is Mr. Wizard, science for people who just didn't go to school for it but find it cool just because science is cool in-itself.

      I suppose thats main difference in how people teach science; one group thinks to be interesting science must DO something. The other school think that the intrinsic "aha" of science is enough to make it interesting. I find the former group to be annoying, and more destructive than useful.

      Tyson is willing to let the science talk for itself, without dressing it up. Which makes him Sagan-y enough to reboot something as venerable as Cosmos. He's more likely to let the sheer beauty of the universe talk for itself, without forcing wormholes and time-travel down our throats.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    39. Re:Let me guess by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 1
      --
      Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
    40. Re:Let me guess by spire3661 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think of the Persistence of Memory all the time. It was this chapter that brought the past alive for me. After i read that chapter Jefferson, Newton, Socrates, Aristotle became living men to me. I was able to peer across time through the works of these men and see them as humans. Thats what is great about Cosmos, its much more then an essay on astrophysics.

      --
      Good-bye
    41. Re:Let me guess by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      Good point. Plus Spitzer, Kepler.. a few others. Not to mention the recent machine exploration of Mars and to a lesser degree Titan and Saturn.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    42. Re:Let me guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? You mean the earth and space and everything isn't made of "Star Stuff" ? I suppose next you're going to tell me that everything in the universe just happened to be there and spontaneously created life all by itself.

    43. Re:Let me guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He sounds like a crackpot on a lot of things, frankly. His science explanations are full of half-truths, sloppy logic and misinformation. I recall one interview during the speculation that neutrinos might go faster than light. He was claiming if that were true, we'd have to suddenly recalibrate GPS. No, Michio, GPS works just fine right now.

    44. Re:Let me guess by CosaNostra+Pizza+Inc · · Score: 1

      Neil DeGrasse Tyson is awesome. He is the only suitable successor, IMO, to Carl Sagan for a remake.

    45. Re:Let me guess by CosaNostra+Pizza+Inc · · Score: 2

      I'd mod you up a "funny" but I have no mod points :-(

    46. Re:Let me guess by CosaNostra+Pizza+Inc · · Score: 1

      Michio Kaku would be a close contender but deGrasse Tyson has more Charisma and humor.

    47. Re:Let me guess by CosaNostra+Pizza+Inc · · Score: 1

      No being fox it will go 9 shows they will cancel it and then there will be a 'cult following' and petitions to bring it back.

      You mean like Futurama :-(

    48. Re:Let me guess by CosaNostra+Pizza+Inc · · Score: 1

      You must have seen the "Carl Sagan for Rednecks" parody on Family Guy. If not, look for it on Youtube. Its hilarious.

    49. Re:Let me guess by CosaNostra+Pizza+Inc · · Score: 1

      There is no way Fox is cancelling COPS and launching Cosmos. Expect the execs there to come to their senses pretty quickly and replace this with a reality show following the lives of transsexual meth-addicted circus performers.

      Sadly, I'm inclined to agree with you. Anything that is smart and geeky, even if it dressed up with the wit and style of deGrasse Tyson, will be deemed too cerebral by Fox execs. They will move the show to an odd timeslot, the ratings will summarily drop, and then they will cancel the show, citing low ratings.

    50. Re:Let me guess by pwizard2 · · Score: 1

      As long as they keep the Vangelis intro theme....

      --
      "It is a denial of justice not to stretch out a helping hand to the fallen; that is the common right of humanity."
    51. Re:Let me guess by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      Actually I don't like postmodernism either. But your critique of climate science is just as bad as postmodernism.

    52. Re: Let me guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sadly, you seem to think religion is the province of conservatives. If you actually followed your religion (I assume Judaic or Christian-based), then in today's society you would have to be a radical, at the very least a progressive. Go back and read your infallible wisdom from god, we'll wait...

      You wouldn't be "conservative", for which the current true meaning is, "corporatist reactionary".

    53. Re:Let me guess by hackula · · Score: 0

      CGI will help Fox & Friends[tm] to visualize humans riding dinosaurs, jesus performing magical miracles, and humans NOT evolving from monkeys.

    54. Re:Let me guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any observation point in the universe is the center. So... technically the Earth is the center of the universe, I'm the center of the universe and Alpha Centauri is the center ect.

    55. Re:Let me guess by cyberchondriac · · Score: 2

      Agenda much? I have never seen anyone on Fox promote those extremist views, at least not someone who represented the network. Young Earth creationists are, fortunately, a fringe cult, not the bulk of the conservative base. There might be a lot of half naked chicks on the show though..!

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    56. Re:Let me guess by TheGoodNamesWereGone · · Score: 1

      It amazes me how Fox's entertainment division can put sheer crapfests like "American I-Duh-l" and "Jumping Around Like A Monkey With The Stars" on the air, and then schizophrenically give a greenlight to this, which promises to be great.

    57. Re:Let me guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Arrested Development, Family Guy, Firefly, Undeclared, Brimstone, Tru Calling, Drive, Profit, Werewolf, John Doe, Strange Luck, Millennium, The Lone Gunman, The Tick, Wonderfalls, Terminator, Keen Eddie, Lie to Me, Dollhouse, et cetera.

    58. Re:Let me guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      who merely assume that the climate of a 5-billion-year-old planet will be catastrophically ruined by driving SUVs

      The world will go on, of course; will the climate continue to be suitable for us though?

    59. Re:Let me guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      6000 + 33 years old, and the Catholic Church has admitted it is the Sun that we revolve around, not the other way around. Fox will stick to that unless Rush Limbaugh objects.

    60. Re:Let me guess by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Inflation: Trillions and Trillions

    61. Re:Let me guess by kermidge · · Score: 1

      I'd heard of Sagan and had read several of his popular books, so enjoyed watching the series and how he brought a mess of stuff together, the subjects, people, and connections.

      If deGrasse Tyson does even half so well, which I think likely, the remake should be worth the watching.

    62. Re:Let me guess by mattack2 · · Score: 2

      It amazes me how Fox's entertainment division can put sheer crapfests like "American I-Duh-l" and "Jumping Around Like A Monkey With The Stars" on the air

      I presume you are referring to "Dancing with the Stars" with the latter. That is an ABC show, and even having Woz on it wouldn't get me to watch it. (Though I actually don't mean that to be as negative as it sounds. I definitely watch some reality shows, and hate the "all reality TV is bad" mindset.. though admittedly, FF and being able to play-faster-than-realtime-with-sound are extra helpful on some reality shows.)

      BTW, semi--related, supposedly Isaac Asimov wrote an article for TV Guide in the 1970s about "Three's Company" being his favorite show. So everyone needs some "dumb entertainment".

    63. Re:Let me guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not just create the universe to get real copy of him?

    64. Re:Let me guess by Pseudonym+Authority · · Score: 1

      Try reading his books. "In the future, we'll master string theory and have robots smaller than an electron to do all the work and Jedi Knights traveling the universe at one hundred trillion times the speed of light!" He makes Kurzweil look like a depressed, pessimistic misanthrope.

    65. Re:Let me guess by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      More to the point, in the Seth McFarlane version Neil deGrasse Tyson recalls winning a date in Mexico with Gary Coleman.

      Don't thank me, thank the manatees.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    66. Re:Let me guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what happened to the Firefly series...

    67. Re:Let me guess by MiSaunaSnob · · Score: 1

      In point of fact we did not evolve from monkeys. We share a common ancestor.

    68. Re:Let me guess by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BEq_o9xwbPw&feature=endscreen&NR=1

      lol that was funny.. (you do realize that was a satire, right..?)

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    69. Re:Let me guess by argStyopa · · Score: 1

      Of course, that's the begged creed at the base of the AGW mantra: we want nothing to change so it stays at (what we think is) "perfect for us".

      Aside from the everpresent possibility that some massive supernova x-ray wavefront is racing towards us undetected at light speed and will sterilize the planet in the next moment, the root question is: why SHOULD it stay this way, so nice for us? There's nothing particularly human-favoring about the universe, the entire span of humanity's existence might be nothing more on the scale of the galaxy than a single bright little ephemeral flicker of a cinder floating above the the flames of a bonfire, where a *blip* of conditions favorable to us happened to exist, by accident.

      --
      -Styopa
  2. Halle-bloody-luia by vikingpower · · Score: 1

    Tyson has his own show, now. Nothing against the man, and I can really laugh when he is being funny - but isn't this a bit over the top ? OTOH, popularizing science is a great and lofty goal...

    --
    Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
    1. Re:Halle-bloody-luia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do know that he's an astrophysicist, not a comedian, right?

    2. Re:Halle-bloody-luia by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Tyson is our best 'science popularizer'. Thats what Sagan's true legacy is, the ability to speak to a good chunk of the masses and inspire them. Can you name someone else you think would be better at doing Cosmos?

      --
      Good-bye
    3. Re:Halle-bloody-luia by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Maybe that's what we need to pull this society's collective head out of its ass: A Steve Jobs of Science!

    4. Re:Halle-bloody-luia by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      Can you name someone else you think would be better at doing Cosmos?

      Cmdr Chris Hadfield

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
  3. A SCIENCE GUY by AxDx · · Score: 2

    Let's just hope it doesn't feature a fat oafish stereotypical insecure male, a hot wife, and a talking animal

    1. Re:A SCIENCE GUY by sp332 · · Score: 1

      With Seth MacFarlane as executive producer, of course it will be.

  4. *sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    It will star astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson.

    Am I the only one who's sick of this guy? Does he have to be in every program even tangentially related to astronomy?

    1. Re:*sigh* by Kreigaffe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      From what I understand, if something is even tangentially related to astronomy, and it's possible to bring him in.. people will want to do that, because he's a likeable guy, he's smart and blunt but not demeaning or haughty, he's passionate but relatable, and he's smart AND cool.

      Honestly I'd much rather hear his opinion on non-science matters rather than celebrity opinions on anything that isn't acting or singing or sex tapes or whatever else got them famous.

      --
      ... still waiting for this free-as-in-beer free beer I keep hearing about. :|
    2. Re:*sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It will star astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson.

      Am I the only one who's sick of this guy? Does he have to be in every program even tangentially related to astronomy?

      How many great science popularizers do you see on tv ?
      I mean real scientists that speak about SCIENCE not pseudo-science ?

    3. Re:*sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can a program called Cosmos--that is about the cosmos--only be tangentially related to astronomy?

      Also, I'm more tired of Michio Kaku than I am of NdGT. I do still like them both, though.

    4. Re:*sigh* by gmuslera · · Score: 1

      Consider the alternative: it could be "Star Trek's Guide to the Cosmos" hosted by actors from the series . You have to admit that exploring the universe the Enterprise (and maybe a DeLorean for the episodes related to the history of science, those hosted by Doc Brown) will look better than doing it a dandelion seed. If you will give wings to your imagination, let your culture pick the right kind.

    5. Re:*sigh* by rk · · Score: 1

      Don't cross the canons!

  5. This has made my day. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There's no more Carl Sagan, no more Bill Nye on television, nothing except Mythbusters to inspire future generations of engineers and scientific thinkers. This has made my day, there may just be hope for the future yet.

    1. Re:This has made my day. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      And then I saw that Seth MacFarlane is involved. And I lost all hope.

    2. Re:This has made my day. by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

      Except it won't be on public television, it'll be on Fox. There's a good chance any principle will be sacrificed before the first season is finished filming for spectacle. Gotta sell those commercial time slots.

    3. Re:This has made my day. by sizzzzlerz · · Score: 2

      And Mythbusters has taken to either blowing shit up or shooting guns at something almost every single episode. Hardly the stuff of inspiration.

    4. Re:This has made my day. by j00r0m4nc3r · · Score: 3, Funny

      Not true. It inspires me to change the channel.

    5. Re:This has made my day. by chispito · · Score: 1

      There's no more Carl Sagan, no more Bill Nye on television, nothing except Mythbusters to inspire future generations of engineers and scientific thinkers. This has made my day, there may just be hope for the future yet.

      Perhaps the young generation isn't looking to TV for inspiration?

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    6. Re:This has made my day. by gmuslera · · Score: 1

      Well, at least Mythbusters is like watching to the letter all the equations of the theory of relativity compared with the "scientific" shows of the history channel. Or anything science related that shows Fox News.

      In the other hand, even What-If try to explore ideas till something big happens

    7. Re:This has made my day. by Darth+Snowshoe · · Score: 1

      Bill Nye is still around. He is all over the Planetary Society, for instance, and does a lot of science advocacy through them.

      Carl Sagan was the fucking Man. But I for one am glad to have both Bill Nye (on DVDs) and Neil Degrasse Tyson (sp?) around.

    8. Re:This has made my day. by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      If Mythbusters is inspiring modern day engineers, well i feel bad for them. Mythbusters is scientifically crap TV.

      --
      Good-bye
    9. Re:This has made my day. by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      [citation needed]

      They talk about getting good, reliable, repeatable data. Adam is thrilled when the data proves his hypothesis wrong.

      How is that not good science?

  6. Tyson, eh? by GottMitUns · · Score: 1

    Producers should've just put Mike Tyson in there. That would have been a blast!

    1. Re:Tyson, eh? by SirGarlon · · Score: 2

      Mike Tyson is more into medieval history than since, last I heard.

      --
      [Sir Garlon] is the marvellest knight that is now living, for he destroyeth many good knights, for he goeth invisible.
  7. Narrated by Peter Griffin? by netwarerip · · Score: 1

    Then I will watch for sure.

    1. Re:Narrated by Peter Griffin? by guttentag · · Score: 1

      It's the next episode in MacFarlane's Star Wars remake series. Remember, at the beginning of Blue Harvest Peter said "let's start with part four." He then went on to do parts five and six, so now he's going back to do part one to explain how it all began, only on a grander scale, possibly with Tom Hanks voicing a long-eared character with a pull string who is like the Forrest Gump of the universe. It will require RealPlayer 7 to watch.

    2. Re:Narrated by Peter Griffin? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut up, Meg.

      .

  8. What? by Enry · · Score: 1

    Nah, only Sagan could do it. There's nobody around these days that could possibly....

    It will star astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson

    Uhm..nevermind.

    1. Re:What? by funwithBSD · · Score: 2

      I was hoping for Amy Mainzer!

      --
      Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
    2. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She's hot.

    3. Re:What? by TWiTfan · · Score: 1

      I was hoping for Amy Mainzer!

      To do what?

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
    4. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, that's not a half bad idea. I like Neil just fine, but not enough for him to be the go-to guy for EVERYTHING, as he has been. It's time to spread the love. Amy Mainzer is solid. And it's not exactly hard to stare at her for five hours. AND a scientist who's also a lady is almost as rare as a scientist who's also a black person. I consume a lot of pop science media, and I'd say for television, I've seen Neil a great deal more than female science presenters. Plural society bleeding hearts - go go!

    5. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anything she wants!

    6. Re:What? by funwithBSD · · Score: 1

      Help repopulate Mars?

      --
      Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
  9. We leave Saturn for the deeper regions of the by funwithBSD · · Score: 4, Funny

    cosmos and come upon Uranus...

    *giggity giggity goo*

    --
    Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
    1. Re:We leave Saturn for the deeper regions of the by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      The one day I don't have mod points.

  10. Carl Sagan by Frankie70 · · Score: 1

    Carl Sagan - the Billy Mays of Science.

    1. Re:Carl Sagan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, science needs more Billy Mays types. People need to be shocked out of their ignorance comas. :-)

  11. Better than The Elegant Universe? by wcrowe · · Score: 1

    Neil deGrasse Tyson will be an excellent show host. I'm looking forward to it, although it will be hard to beat The Elegant Universe series offered on PBS.

    --
    Proverbs 21:19
    1. Re:Better than The Elegant Universe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All it would take to beat TEU would be a focus on something other than strings. Say on something scientific.

    2. Re:Better than The Elegant Universe? by BiggoronSword · · Score: 1

      Through the Wormhole is a pretty good one too.

      --
      interactive hologram, or it didn't happen.
  12. And here I was hoping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the ridiculous worship of Neil deGrasse Tyson would start to abate.

    1. Re:And here I was hoping by TWiTfan · · Score: 0

      But he's a black scientist! No arrest record or anything!

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
    2. Re:And here I was hoping by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

      I'm right there with you, but don't hold your breath. It's appropriate that he's going to be doing this show. He's precisely this generation's equivalent of Sagan: a scientist who did good work in his field early on but who has since coasted on a public image as the Voice Of Science, with his most mundane statements breathlessly repeated as though they were great wisdom. [shrug] I guess it's better for people to choose a scientist to worship than an actor, musician, athlete, politician, or preacher, but it's still kind of irritating to watch.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    3. Re:And here I was hoping by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      It's appropriate that he's going to be doing this show. He's precisely this generation's equivalent of Sagan: a scientist who did good work in his field early on but who has since coasted on a public image as the Voice Of Science

      Most of the minority of scientists that do really good scientific work ever do it early on in their career and coast from there on; moving on to be an effective popularizer of science that gets more people interested has at least as much social utility as most other courses that follow early scientific success.

    4. Re:And here I was hoping by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      You are missing the forest for the trees. Sagan's absolute top accomplishment was becoming Science Popularizer. That IN ITSELF is a huge scientific accomplishment and his ultimate legacy.

      --
      Good-bye
    5. Re:And here I was hoping by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

      You left off the rest: "with his most mundane statements breathlessly repeated as though they were great wisdom." It's not Tyson's being an effective science popularizer that bugs me--I'm all for that--but the cult-of-personality aspect which seems to follow. Again, this is very much as it was with Sagan.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    6. Re:And here I was hoping by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      You left off the rest: "with his most mundane statements breathlessly repeated as though they were great wisdom." It's not Tyson's being an effective science popularizer that bugs me--I'm all for that--but the cult-of-personality aspect which seems to follow.

      The two are inseparable in practice. Charismatic, effective communicators in any field generate cults-of-personality.

  13. Can't wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I actually just got through watching the original Cosmos series on Hulu. For 1980, it's a very entertaining show and accessible to normals. And anything that stands up against the tide of really awful, retarded television that has popped up in the last 10 years is good.

    Reading some of the backstory, Seth McFarlane appears to be putting his money behind this as sort of an anti-Family Guy force, so hopefully it should be very good. Having it on Fox is also a good idea - there's probably more money being splashed around it, and it doesn't have the "stigma" of being on PBS.

    Anything that sparks even the slightest interest in science is a good thing, even if it's wrapped up in an entertaining story. My man Carl said something like, "Everyone is born with natural curiosity. Most people get it stomped out of them early. A few manage to survive and become scientists."

  14. Worst disaster since the Tunguska Incident by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. gah.. really? .. gah.. Reeeealllly?

    Sagan must be spinning in his grave.

    1. Re:Worst disaster since the Tunguska Incident by ArcadeMan · · Score: 4, Funny

      With so many people spinning in their graves, you'd think free energy would be reality by now.

  15. Will by JustOK · · Score: 1

    Will it have billions and billions of Hollywood stars? Was Fox thinking of billions and billions of dollars?

    --
    rewriting history since 2109
  16. I made an account after 10+ years just to say... by Kl00dge · · Score: 1

    I was *really* hoping Prof. Brian Cox would do this one day. His passion is inspiring. Neil deGrasse Tyson comes off as a bit arrogant to me, but I guess it could be worse. Thank God it isn't Michelle Thaller. I'm sure she's a fine lady, it just grates on my nerves the way she talks; like she's teaching 1st graders that the sun "rotates" around the earth.

  17. Fox? by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 0

    Are they planning on re-making Cosmos as a fictional comedy?

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
    1. Re:Fox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To Fox, the idea that the universe is more than 6000 years old is already fictional and quite possible comical.

  18. Re:Old news is soooo exciting! by TheSync · · Score: 1

    The news is that FOX announced this will actually air in the 2013-2014 season at their upfronts on Monday. Before that, it was unclear as to when it would air.

  19. Kirk Cameron and a Banana by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I await the episode featuring Kirk Cameron and a Banana.

  20. Re:I made an account after 10+ years just to say.. by Ogi_UnixNut · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Heh, funny. I can't stand Brian Cox. I just find his manner irritating, and as a result I don't watch any of the shows he is on.

    Just goes to show the variety in peoples tastes, eh? :)

    I've not imagined Neil DeGrasse Tyson as a host, but I am willing to give it a shot and see how it goes. Who knows, he might actually be good at it.

  21. bad decision. by nimbius · · Score: 1

    Macfarlane should have been passed over for this for one reason: He completely bombed the 2013 Oscars. Its not something you have to improv or give a great deal of consideration to; the entire event is scripted. The audience is known, and every variable has been populated for your consideration. Despite having a completely controlled environment, he still managed to fail miserably. His irreverant banter with Shatner, juvenile Gay Men’s Chorus of Los Angeles number that just seemed to drag on ad-nauseum, and generally sexist hosting of the Oscars with deadpan jokes and universally reviled criticism should have been a red flag for Fox. Instead you're taking the guy who made Family Guy, the Cleveland Show, Ted, and American Dad and asking him to participate in a documentary about the cosmos with Neil deGrasse Tyson. Tyson juxtaposed against Macfarlanes habitual 'coonery bafoonery' portrayal of black characters is a gut-wretching consideration.

    Morgan Freeman is more qualified as an executive producer based on his experience with Nova.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:bad decision. by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Unless he WRTOE the script for the Oscars, i dont see the relevance here. So hes not a an actor/presenter, hes still a pretty accomplished producer/writer. By the way, hes been asked to do it again next year.... Macfarlane may make his money off fart jokes, but hes incredibly smart. I can guarantee there will be no Family Guy crap in Cosmos.

      --
      Good-bye
    2. Re:bad decision. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, calm down, Tonto. Maybe you noticed, in the fucking summary, that McFarlane is an *Executive* Producer. That doesn't mean shit. He's not the writer, director, or casting director.

      Do you even know what an actual producer does? Take that, reduce to one tenth, and you get executive producer.

      But don't let me rain on your dumb-as-shit rant.

      Oh, and I also didn't care for his performance at the Oscars, because I don't find him very interesting as a performer, but you ALSO fail because you don't have a clue why he hosted it the way he did.

  22. As Carl once said... by freeze128 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "If you wish to make a science show from scratch, you must first invent the universe."

  23. "Surprisingly, Seth MacFarlane of Family Guy fame" by FilmedInNoir · · Score: 1

    Why surprisingly? Cause Family Guy is all fart jokes...right?
    Those ones with Stewie and the nerdy stuff like Star Trek and Star Wars are actually the writings of Seth Green who's known for his Phd. in Astrophysics and action figure collection.

    --
    Sig. Sig. Sputnik
  24. Not on Fox, no way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fox? Not watching it. I don't care, they're assholes and I'm not providing eyeballs for their advertisers. I don't watch Fox or Siffy, so I missed Battlestar Galactica until it came out on DVD.

    1. Re:Not on Fox, no way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Well arent you just the morally superior little cutie that is a shining example to the rest of us.

  25. sorry by wbr1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Neil you killed Pluto. Fuck you.

    --
    Silence is a state of mime.
    1. Re:sorry by T.E.D. · · Score: 2

      Neil you killed Pluto

      Come on. Walking around flashing that highly eliptical orbit far outside the plane the rest of the respectible planets oribit in, acting all chaoitc like a common comet, Pluto was clearly asking for it. I mean, its sad it happened and all, but hardly suprising. Someone was bound to attack Pluto sonner or later.

    2. Re:sorry by Bacon+Bits · · Score: 1

      Captain Hindsight says:
      If you wanted Pluto to remain a planet you shouldn't have insisted we explore the solar system to find out why it behaves so weird.

      --
      The road to tyranny has always been paved with claims of necessity.
    3. Re:sorry by Randle_Revar · · Score: 1

      Pluto is planet. Everyone admits it is a dwarf planet, but dwarf is just a modifier. A dwarf human is still a human. So Pluto is a planet, one of 13 currently known in the solar system (though it is thought there may be one hundred or more)

    4. Re:sorry by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      Well, what about that jerk Herschel who demoted Ceres? Why isn't anyone upset about him doing that?

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    5. Re:sorry by SeattleGameboy · · Score: 1

      Sure, always blame the victim. Pluto is such a planetary whore...

    6. Re:sorry by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

      A dwarf human is still a human. So Pluto is a planet

      Ah. Well, in that case we're reclassifying them all as "giant comets", just to avoid confusing logicians like yourself.

    7. Re:sorry by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      Pluto is planet. Everyone admits it is a dwarf planet, but dwarf is just a modifier. A dwarf human is still a human. So Pluto is a planet, one of 13 currently known in the solar system (though it is thought there may be one hundred or more)

      OK, when you get all elementary schools to teach about all 13 planets, I'll go along with it.

      (BTW, I don't disagree that emotionally it was a tiny bit sad to have what we "know" about the solar system changed.)

    8. Re:sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's only sad because Disney named a dog after it. Nobody cried when Ceres' planethood was revoked.

    9. Re:sorry by Randle_Revar · · Score: 1

      It isn't about sad, it about sense, and the IAU's definition doesn't make any, logically or scientifically

  26. Would have been Genius by kmahan · · Score: 1

    They should have cast William Atherton

    --
    Invalid Checksum. Retrying.
  27. Since it's Fox and involves science and space... by tpjunkie · · Score: 1

    we can expect it gets cancelled less than halfway through its run

  28. You all know this is gonna be EPIC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And i hate using that word!!

  29. Seth McFarlane? by Iniamyen · · Score: 2

    Didn't Robot Chicken already do this three months ago?

    ... Don't be glib about this stuff, Dad. It's a legitimate show and they beat you to the punch.

    ... You know, Dad, You're a real jerk!

    1. Re:Seth McFarlane? by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      That was one of the best moments in the whole episode.

      --
      Good-bye
  30. Cosmos Remake Coming To Fox In 2014 by WOOFYGOOFY · · Score: 0

    They're going to leave out that whole "evolution" part.

  31. Target audience mismatch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The average Fox viewer will only understand Cosmos if it is reduced to "fireball warms planet but not too much" and shots of a man's testicles getting sucked into a black hole.

    Fox. Its got what plants crave.

  32. Brian Cox. by denzacar · · Score: 2

    The physicist, not the actor.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:Brian Cox. by rotaryexpress · · Score: 1

      I agree. Brian Cox's Wonders of the Solar System/Universe reminded me very much of an updated Cosmos.

    2. Re:Brian Cox. by NotSoHeavyD3 · · Score: 1

      To add on to this I really wish it was him and Jim Al-Khalili doing the hosting. Neil is too much "Oh my god black holes" for me. That reminds me, does anybody know if James Burke doing any new shows?(another guy I'd prefer to Tyson)

      --
      Did you know 80 to 90% of the moderators on slashdot wouldn't recognize a troll even if one dragged them under a bridge.
    3. Re:Brian Cox. by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      The James Bourke reference for people who don't know who he was.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    4. Re:Brian Cox. by dogbowl · · Score: 1

      He did a one-off follow up to Connections recently, but other than that I don't know of anything.

      --

      These pretzels are making me thirsty.
  33. Hypnotic Voice... by jzarling · · Score: 2

    Carl Sagan had a voice that could lull you into a trance -

    --
    It is better to be the hammer than the anvil.
    1. Re:Hypnotic Voice... by polyp2000 · · Score: 1

      A while back i wrote a tune on Linux (with Renoise) featuring the dulcet tones of Carl Sagan! https://soundcloud.com/polyp/dark-existance-feat-carl-sagan Perhaps i should try and convince Fox to use it as the theme music (In my dreams) N ...

      --
      Electronic Music Made Using Linux http://soundcloud.com/polyp
    2. Re:Hypnotic Voice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't check it out at work, but the Symphony of Science guy auto-tuned a bunch of Sagan quotes in his earlier stuff until Ann Druyan shut him down. There's some fun stuff there.

  34. Mike Tyson is an astrophysicist? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    I'm confused.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  35. If you can't find what you're looking for ,,,, by westlake · · Score: 1

    There's no more Carl Sagan, no more Bill Nye on television, nothing except Mythbusters to inspire future generations of engineers and scientific thinkers.

    PBS is the obvious response.

    But there are others and there is more to science and to scientific thinking than engineering.

    National Geographic Channel

    Smithsonian Channel

    Science Channel

    The Discovery Channel --- in its many incarnations --- has a lot to offer if you are willing to poke around a bit.

    1. Re:If you can't find what you're looking for ,,,, by TheSync · · Score: 1

      BTW, National Geographic Channel is a joint venture of National Geographic Television & Film and Fox Cable Networks.

    2. Re:If you can't find what you're looking for ,,,, by Randle_Revar · · Score: 1

      All of the Discovery channels and NatGeo have declined since they where launched. They are not yet as bad as Discovery proper, TLC, or the History Channel, but they are sliding that way.

  36. Re:I made an account after 10+ years just to say.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Listen to his Star Talk podcast. It's really good (though he has a strong tendency to interrupt).

  37. Re:I made an account after 10+ years just to say.. by denzacar · · Score: 1

    Neil deGrasse Tyson comes off as a bit arrogant to me,

    Indeed.
    I completely understand his "I shall suffer no fools any longer" attitude, but he does put a barrier where there shouldn't be any.
    Also, he seems to be aware that he is often rather negative in his approach to explanation, with his tendency to end his talks and discussions with a joke.

    Brian Cox on the other hand seems much more opened, approachable and optimistically enthusiastic.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  38. Taking bets on when this Fox show is cancelled by TheSkepticalOptimist · · Score: 2

    choices are:
    1) after first episode
    2) after third episode
    3) after 10 episodes, remaining episodes only on DVD
    4) after 22 episodes, wait a few years, then brought back for another 11 only to be cancelled again after 8 are aired
    5) after 25 years and counting.

    Also taking bets on when this show is aired:
    1) Sundays
    2) Fridays
    3) Every other Friday
    4) Randomly so nobody knows the show exists( i.e. Firefly scheduling).
    5) Sometime after baseball ends

    Well at least if Seth McFarlane is producing it, the amount of schedule fuckery Fox will do to the show will be far less than if Joss Whedon was producing it.

    --
    I haven't thought of anything clever to put here, but then again most of you haven't either.
  39. Potentially injurious idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bet the sex tips will be terrible.

    Wait....Cosmos?

    Well, I bet they will still be terrible...

  40. Re:I made an account after 10+ years just to say.. by wiredlogic · · Score: 2

    You don't have to imagine. Take a look at his hosting on Nova Science Now. That's essentially what the new program will be like.

    --
    I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
  41. Why is it surprising... by Jerslan · · Score: 1

    ... that a dude who is totally obsessed with space and Sci-Fi in general would be producing this? Especially when said dude clearly has the pull needed with Fox to get this off the ground; something Neil deGrasse Tyson and Ann Druyan clearly lack. Without MacFarlane this project would have, at best, been produced by PBS and seen by relatively few people.

    1. Re:Why is it surprising... by spongman · · Score: 1

      to be fair to PBS, Cosmos was "first broadcast by the Public Broadcasting Service in 1980 and was the most widely watched series in the history of American public television until The Civil War (1990)."

    2. Re:Why is it surprising... by Jerslan · · Score: 1

      That was also before both Cable and Satellite were as widely available as they are now (rare in 1980, almost ubiquitous now), so PBS arguably had a larger and more diverse viewer-base back in 1980 (and even 1990).

  42. The next "Butthead Astronomer" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You might remember that Carl Sagan objected to his name being used for an Apple product in development, so they changed the name from "Carl Sagan" to "Butthead Astronomer." All hail the new "Butthead Astronomer!"

    Honestly, Carl Sagan was legitimate scientist and college professor at Cornell University who leveraged his university lectures into the Cosmos series. Neil deGrasse Tyson has some pretty big shoes to fill.

  43. hm... by P-niiice · · Score: 1

    It will star astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson

    YESSS!

  44. Cosmos Can't Be Cloned by RandCraw · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Cosmos was unique. 33 years ago an astronomer / story teller with a luminous passion for the past, present, and future of science stepped into the vacuum of imagination that followed Star Trek, bewitching and enthralling a generation of scientist wanna-bes. Sagan thrilled us largely because the world revealed by Cosmos was a joyous surprise.

    But rather than inventing a new series with fresh ideas, Cosmos II is just an attempt to reanimate dead flesh. It's a frankensteinian monster pieced together from someone else's long dead body of work. Magic can't be cloned,

    Fox is not PBS. Tyson is not Sagan. Cosmos should be allowed to rest in peace.

    1. Re:Cosmos Can't Be Cloned by Teresita · · Score: 1

      But rather than inventing a new series with fresh ideas, Cosmos II is just an attempt to reanimate dead flesh. It's a frankensteinian monster pieced together from someone else's long dead body of work. Magic can't be cloned...

      I disagree. There's a lot of neat stuff we've discovered since 1980, particularly with Hubble.

    2. Re:Cosmos Can't Be Cloned by rsborg · · Score: 1

      But rather than inventing a new series with fresh ideas, Cosmos II is just an attempt to reanimate dead flesh. It's a frankensteinian monster pieced together from someone else's long dead body of work. Magic can't be cloned,

      Fox is not PBS. Tyson is not Sagan. Cosmos should be allowed to rest in peace.

      So let me guess - you've seen the show already? You must be connected. I'll give it a watch and see what they create - it could be the next best thing. I'm pretty sure they won't go into Sagan's spaceship (if they do, I'll admit you're right and GG).

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
  45. Re:"Surprisingly, Seth MacFarlane of Family Guy fa by jfengel · · Score: 1

    Green strikes me as a pretty smart guy, but I don't think he has a PhD. I don't believe he even went to college.

    Perhaps you're thinking of Brian May, the Queen guitarist who got a PhD in astrophysics.

  46. Re:"Surprisingly, Seth MacFarlane of Family Guy fa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or maybe the physist Brian Green?? :)

  47. Thank god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a kid I was really fortunate to grow up with tons of good science shows. Mr Wizard's World, 3-2-1 Contact, Bill Nye, Beakman, and tons of various programs on PBS.

    Nowadays there's really nothing about science. I wanted to like Mythbusters but they got rid of all the science material and just focused on explosions. So it's about time we had a science show for everyone to enjoy again.

    Especially now that we are facing anti-education, anti-science, anti-intelligence messages from the right, it's important that we give these topics a boost.

  48. So Americans never discovered a planet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GET THE FUCK OVER IT, ALREADY!

    Sure, it kills you that dirty Brits and Frenchies and others can say they discovered planets and good Gaaaaaaaaaaaad-fearin' red-blooded 'Mericans can't, but it's time for you to grow up, quit crying and stop behaving like some 12-year-old gay emo kid.

    {Captcha: "realists".)

  49. Re:I made an account after 10+ years just to say.. by Raenex · · Score: 1

    Brian Cox on the other hand seems much more opened, approachable and optimistically enthusiastic.

    Yet every time I see his face I get the urge to punch it. Maybe it would help if I were British.

  50. And yet by justthinkit · · Score: 1

    And yet we still haven't figured out how gravity works. Maybe we need less TV shows about physics and more spent on new approaches to trying to solve the fundamental problems in physics.

    --
    I come here for the love
    1. Re:And yet by Pino+Grigio · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. But even some dude standing on screen with a galaxy in the background talking about the "mysteries of the cosmos" is good TV. I love all that stuff.

  51. Re:"Surprisingly, Seth MacFarlane of Family Guy fa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Family Guy is crap. Really. SouthParks' dissing of it said it all. Random disconnected one-liners with no overarching view, no subtext. It's crap.

  52. NAH! Won't work. by Stubbyfingers · · Score: 2

    Don't get me wrong. I LIKE Neil DeGrasse Tyson, but Carl Sagan was special. He was a scientist with the soul of a poet. Neil's a great scientist, but I just don't think he has the poetry.