If that captures everything, that's the interesting part to me(though I'm sure it's been known to actual neurologists forever). That means the "clock speed" of the human brain is really really really really low, more or less, right? Like our consciousness is pretty much exclusively the result of massive parallelism?
The nicest thing about the legal system of the US is that incorporates more nuance each step of the way.
Representatives pass a popular, mostly well intentioned bill, with loads of simplifications.(oh but also lobbyist interests) The executive enforces that with experts who try to apply that stricture in a way that seems reasonable for the pragmatic situation.(Oh but also lobbyist interests) The courts then examine iffy situations and issue precedence on places where that goes too far as well.(oh, but also lobbyist interests).
It's a good design.(oh, except for lobbyist interests)
I don't disagree, but the two inevitably end up inter-tangled due to the complexity of life. We can make every attempt to prevent abuse, but abuse will happen too.
Your kid, but X apis are really dumb and obtuse. About the only thing you can say in its favor is that it makes a little more sense than the old MS windows message pump.
Among other things. Safety, cost, energy requirements. Other things that basically say "Yeah, this requires substantial industrial planning and equipment"
In fact, if you're working with molten steel, you're already into a level of industrial effort where casting is almost certainly a cheaper and faster choice.
You can punish the hell out of a perpetrator of the crime(assuming they have presence in the EU). That's what's being considered. Giving companies that have business in the EU pause about mindlessly toadying to US government organizations.
No, I think the interpretation that gives you pause is the correct one. Growth of capacity is exactly what a solar manufacturer would be interested in.
You know electricity is among those things in the category of "incredibly easily moved across state lines after production". Building the station in California won't keep it from supplying Arizona and vice versa.
No, I'm all for it, and would absolutely vote against my representative if they opposed it (and I had one right now). I just mean that the very real political obstacles exist, and sheer pluck on the part of supporters won't make that disappear.
Slashdot Mirror
They're back to historic highs in the US too.
Or too poor to drive.
And what's worst is we use their stories to argue for exacerbating the situation by trying to extend a "cheap oil" economy by all means available.
Have a richer middle class than the US, as of this year?
just in case every single fact needs a link
I did read the summary. I get that there are differences.
Sure, okay. There's more than a little evolutionary separation since then. Do you think there's a good reason to assume the difference is dramatic?
If that captures everything, that's the interesting part to me(though I'm sure it's been known to actual neurologists forever). That means the "clock speed" of the human brain is really really really really low, more or less, right? Like our consciousness is pretty much exclusively the result of massive parallelism?
The nicest thing about the legal system of the US is that incorporates more nuance each step of the way.
Representatives pass a popular, mostly well intentioned bill, with loads of simplifications.(oh but also lobbyist interests)
The executive enforces that with experts who try to apply that stricture in a way that seems reasonable for the pragmatic situation.(Oh but also lobbyist interests)
The courts then examine iffy situations and issue precedence on places where that goes too far as well.(oh, but also lobbyist interests).
It's a good design.(oh, except for lobbyist interests)
I don't disagree, but the two inevitably end up inter-tangled due to the complexity of life. We can make every attempt to prevent abuse, but abuse will happen too.
It is. I'm sorry, omnipresent surveillance tools is a relatively simple consequence.
What's this? A lack of cynicism in a post?
Crucify him! Crucify him!
*reposts the same idea rephrased*
*talks down to me as if I didn't grasp the concept*
Gee, thanks.
This is among the consequences of a surveillance society. More information almost always helps people with positive intentions do their jobs.
On the other hand that's not an endorsement of a surveillance state.
Your kid, but X apis are really dumb and obtuse. About the only thing you can say in its favor is that it makes a little more sense than the old MS windows message pump.
To an owner planning is identical to cost.
Among other things. Safety, cost, energy requirements. Other things that basically say "Yeah, this requires substantial industrial planning and equipment"
In fact, if you're working with molten steel, you're already into a level of industrial effort where casting is almost certainly a cheaper and faster choice.
But that would have cost the company a little more money.
You can punish the hell out of a perpetrator of the crime(assuming they have presence in the EU). That's what's being considered. Giving companies that have business in the EU pause about mindlessly toadying to US government organizations.
Not in the context of my argument, if you look back, I said focusing on more extreme(and obviously debilitating) cases is a better approach.
No, I think the interpretation that gives you pause is the correct one. Growth of capacity is exactly what a solar manufacturer would be interested in.
You know electricity is among those things in the category of "incredibly easily moved across state lines after production". Building the station in California won't keep it from supplying Arizona and vice versa.
Build the stations where pragmatism dictates.
I implied that this bill wasn't going to pass. I stand by that guess.
No, I'm all for it, and would absolutely vote against my representative if they opposed it (and I had one right now). I just mean that the very real political obstacles exist, and sheer pluck on the part of supporters won't make that disappear.
Alright, so... let's put it this way: the obstacles to it happening are greater than the collective will to see it happen.
And with some sort of perfect foresight, that'd be sensible. I'm not sure how possible it is.