Hey, look, being called an idiot on the internet. That's new, and helpful.
Proper doesn't mean smart. And you're a douchebag who is incapable of more than a single-dimension of thinking, but yay, you found something you could twist into a contradiction with enough ignorance.
Hoo-ray! That means you win! And winning means no one gets anything out of the discussion! Exactly the point!
I wish there was some objective test that would help us identify those that enjoy hassling others. Sadly the best metric we have is childhood essays on how they want to go into law enforcement.
I agree, but recall that congress raised gigantic stink about this exact same kind of "traditional investigative work". For no other reason than an imagined slight on guns.
Politics in this country is poisonous towards doing things right, and apathetic towards abuses.
A. Retarded, because having land in multiple provinces doesn't exempt you from their laws B. Highly impractical, because a border town doesn't necessarily straddle a border and C. Obviously meant as an stupidly elaborate work-around for an unnecessary situation.
Should it really, though? If you run a store on a border town, where the majority don't actually speak french, should some demi-nationalists be able to dictate your areas culture?
It'd be like the rest of Canada forcing the Quebecois to have English everywhere.
I doubt it's a fundamental difficulty. They ported the engine. If I had to guess, it's a few of the specific assets, like shaders, that they weren't bothering with.
Seeing as their console they're releasing is fundamentally just a linux computer, they're almost certainly planning all future major releases to target linux.
Ah, but those evolved from simpler cyanobacteria that could exist in homeostasis in lower pressure liquid water. Those adaptations don't have the same proposed naturalistic mechanisms of arising that self-replicating protein chains do.
I'm not sure the idea of "protecting provisions enumerated in the bill of rights" qualifies as a "libertarian-whateveryouguyscalltherestofus" divide. I'm pretty sure you'd get like 90% of Americans to agree the bill of rights is a great idea if you asked them. The problem here is the hyper-conservative majority of the supreme court, for whom legal protection is an idea that only applies to corporations. If you read the majority opinion, it's basically "who cares if someone objects?" And the dissenting opinion is more or less what everyone here is saying.
On the other hand, the crime being covered up was that the objector beat an infant, and the mother of the infant agreed to the search. Which sounds a lot more sympathetic.
Ah, but the problem is that the primary H1B supplying nations are actually having their own tech economies pick up, driving up imported wages(and you have to pay for cost-of-living in the US, even if retirement money/other savings goes out of the country)
Let's hypothetically say you support your app(yeah, I know, basically unheard of on phones, but bear with me). Do you really think you're going to be able to do a reasonable job of it, if you don't know which functions of your app users have enabled permissions for.
Ooops, your app crashes for the 3% of users who turn of contact searching. It's your fault, because you didn't tell them it was essential(except you did, and they disagreed)
They wouldn't understand why pieces of the application would throw exceptions that the app itself didn't know how to handle, since it was coded with certain behaviors as default, no.
Slashdot Mirror
Read it again, pal, I think you got confused.
Hey, look, being called an idiot on the internet. That's new, and helpful.
Proper doesn't mean smart. And you're a douchebag who is incapable of more than a single-dimension of thinking, but yay, you found something you could twist into a contradiction with enough ignorance.
Hoo-ray! That means you win! And winning means no one gets anything out of the discussion! Exactly the point!
I'm not asking the stupid store to do it. I'm making a case in a public forum, because that influences how democracy makes laws, numbnuts.
I wish there was some objective test that would help us identify those that enjoy hassling others. Sadly the best metric we have is childhood essays on how they want to go into law enforcement.
The near-border quality was a situational description, not a legal one. I was arguing against the intent of the law, thanks.
No, to get rid of laws enforcing cultural hegemonies, which tend to be short-sighted, ineffective, and harmful.
Of course it failed, it wasn't a well-done traditional investigation, but come on, it's the feds, do you expect constant competence?
Wikipedia sucks with their damned, redirects. And that's all I have to say about my mistake.
I agree, but recall that congress raised gigantic stink about this exact same kind of "traditional investigative work". For no other reason than an imagined slight on guns.
Politics in this country is poisonous towards doing things right, and apathetic towards abuses.
I'm pretty sure your solution is
A. Retarded, because having land in multiple provinces doesn't exempt you from their laws
B. Highly impractical, because a border town doesn't necessarily straddle a border
and
C. Obviously meant as an stupidly elaborate work-around for an unnecessary situation.
Should it really, though? If you run a store on a border town, where the majority don't actually speak french, should some demi-nationalists be able to dictate your areas culture?
It'd be like the rest of Canada forcing the Quebecois to have English everywhere.
As long as you personally feel justified in hurting someone else, what else could possibly matter?
It didn't occur to you that the bobbing up and down sphere making elaborate series of facial expressions during the intro was supposed to be talking?
Correction for topic:
People point out hypocrisy of major corporations, major corporations ignore the criticism and keep on trucking.
I doubt it's a fundamental difficulty. They ported the engine. If I had to guess, it's a few of the specific assets, like shaders, that they weren't bothering with.
Seeing as their console they're releasing is fundamentally just a linux computer, they're almost certainly planning all future major releases to target linux.
Not all 1700 are from Kepler. Problem solved.
Ah, but those evolved from simpler cyanobacteria that could exist in homeostasis in lower pressure liquid water. Those adaptations don't have the same proposed naturalistic mechanisms of arising that self-replicating protein chains do.
The baby had been beaten, for clarification. The found evidence were recent bruises and cuts.
I'm not sure the idea of "protecting provisions enumerated in the bill of rights" qualifies as a "libertarian-whateveryouguyscalltherestofus" divide. I'm pretty sure you'd get like 90% of Americans to agree the bill of rights is a great idea if you asked them. The problem here is the hyper-conservative majority of the supreme court, for whom legal protection is an idea that only applies to corporations. If you read the majority opinion, it's basically "who cares if someone objects?" And the dissenting opinion is more or less what everyone here is saying.
On the other hand, the crime being covered up was that the objector beat an infant, and the mother of the infant agreed to the search. Which sounds a lot more sympathetic.
That's not what I read at all. It seems to be an entirely client side problem.
Ah, but the problem is that the primary H1B supplying nations are actually having their own tech economies pick up, driving up imported wages(and you have to pay for cost-of-living in the US, even if retirement money/other savings goes out of the country)
Juuuuuuuuuuust in case someone takes this seriously, one is deliniated in base 10 units, the other is delineated in base 360 fractions.
Let's hypothetically say you support your app(yeah, I know, basically unheard of on phones, but bear with me). Do you really think you're going to be able to do a reasonable job of it, if you don't know which functions of your app users have enabled permissions for.
Ooops, your app crashes for the 3% of users who turn of contact searching. It's your fault, because you didn't tell them it was essential(except you did, and they disagreed)
They wouldn't understand why pieces of the application would throw exceptions that the app itself didn't know how to handle, since it was coded with certain behaviors as default, no.
Honestly, I wouldn't know, I don't actually use facebook. I'm just projecting my anger for the principal in question at a relevant target.