Slashdot Mirror


Quebec Language Police Target Store Owner's Facebook Page

New submitter wassomeyob writes "In Canada, the province of Quebec has their Official Language Act of 1974 (aka Bill 22) which makes French their sole official language. It has famously been used to force business owners to modify signage to give French pre-eminance over other languages. Now, the Quebec language police seem to be extending their reach to Facebook. Eva Cooper owns Delilah in the Parc — a shop in Chelsea, Quebec near the Quebec/Ontario border. She received a letter from the language office telling her to translate everything posted on her store's Facebook page into French."

506 comments

  1. France is obsolete today. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    France is obsolete today. Face this and get over it. Idiots.

    1. Re:France is obsolete today. by Sockatume · · Score: 2

      Yeah, everyone has upgraded to France Mini. I think that's in Vegas or something.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    2. Re:France is obsolete today. by jockm · · Score: 1

      Um are you sure you don't mean "French"? Because this post is about something that happened in Canada...

      --

      What do you know I wrote a novel
    3. Re:France is obsolete today. by SeeSchloss · · Score: 2

      Well, this is Canada, not France.

    4. Re:France is obsolete today. by NotDrWho · · Score: 1

      this is Canada, not France

      When it comes to Quebec, what's the difference?

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    5. Re:France is obsolete today. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      this is Canada, not France

      When it comes to Quebec, what's the difference?

      That's like asking what is the difference between a Texan and an american. :)

    6. Re: France is obsolete today. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same difference between england and usa

    7. Re:France is obsolete today. by SeeSchloss · · Score: 0

      Different countries usually have different laws, for one thing. But you probably don't know that if you're American.

    8. Re:France is obsolete today. by c-A-d · · Score: 1

      According to Wikipedia, French is still spoken around the world in 29 countries, including Canada, 11 of which it is an official language (wikipedia is wrong here... it's 12. In Canada, French is an official language and is enshrined in the Constitution).

      --
      some karma... and kinda lukewarm about it.
    9. Re: France is obsolete today. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neither is Quebec.Given language origins and so on maybe "Texas and the UK" would have been a fairer comparison though.

    10. Re: France is obsolete today. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      England is a country that has been incorporated into an artificial conglomerate along with the countries of Scotland and Whales. These artificial constructs tend to come apart anywhere in the timespan of a few decades to one or two centuries. In fact, the secession movement in Scotland is gaining more ground recently than ever before. And similarly, there are now some new countries to appear as well as among many others the California Republic and the Texas Republic secede from the United States

    11. Re: France is obsolete today. by mpmansell · · Score: 5, Informative

      nope. USA is a country. England is not. The country is "The United Kingdom" of which England is one part.

      Well, that comes as a big surprise to those of us who were born in one of the countries that comprise the United Kingdom. All this time we believed that Wales, England, and Scotland were each separate countries, with unique cultures and languages that were just part of the UK. Maybe history and having separate laws and legislative systems got us poor little souls confused.

      How lucky we are to have such experts on the InterWebz who can set us straight.

    12. Re: France is obsolete today. by gsslay · · Score: 1

      All countries are "artificial conglomerates". (Although you might argue that Australia has a rational based on physical geography.) Ask Cornwall how they feel about being part of the artificial conglomerate called England.

      I've never been to "Whales", but expect it to be quite small as countries go.

    13. Re: France is obsolete today. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er, close, but you're wrong. England is a country. However it is also part of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

    14. Re: France is obsolete today. by Arker · · Score: 2

      "Country" is actually a bit ambiguous. I believe the most precise way to say it is that England, Scotland, and Wales are three nations incorporated in a single multi-national State, 'the United Kingdom.' (Ireland on the other hand is one nation split between two States.)

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    15. Re:France is obsolete today. by icebike · · Score: 1, Insightful

      this is Canada, not France

      When it comes to Quebec, what's the difference?

      When in France, you are much more likely to find shopkeepers who will actually speak to you
      in English BEFORE you open your wallet showing US currency.

      In Quebec, they don't speak English, unless you have a $10 US bill in your hand, looking
      like you might spend it.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    16. Re:France is obsolete today. by kevingnet3706 · · Score: 1

      Your a mini, I mean You're a meany

    17. Re: France is obsolete today. by mpmansell · · Score: 1

      You might (just about - if you are lucky and the Rugby isn't on the TV) survive saying that in a pub in one of the UK's constituent countries, but we natives consider them to be countries, as do most discussions and articles I have ever read about the Acts of Union :)

      I would call the UK the nation (as would most Brits) which is comprised of the constituent countries. I don't argue that they are not also nations - they are - but a nation can be seen as a much more nebulous entity, often more to do with cultural identity, than distinct geographic boundaries alone.

    18. Re: France is obsolete today. by metrix007 · · Score: 1

      England is a country. The UK is a state/nation.

      --
      If you ignore ACs because they are anonymous - you're an idiot.
    19. Re: France is obsolete today. by GrumpySteen · · Score: 1

      You're related to Miss South Carolina, aren't you.

    20. Re: France is obsolete today. by lucm · · Score: 1

      England? Never heard of it. Is it near Miami? https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    21. Re: France is obsolete today. by gslj · · Score: 2

      England is a country that has been incorporated into an artificial conglomerate along with the countries of Scotland and Whales. These artificial constructs tend to come apart anywhere in the timespan of a few decades to one or two centuries. In fact, the secession movement in Scotland is gaining more ground recently than ever before. And similarly, there are now some new countries to appear as well as among many others the California Republic and the Texas Republic secede from the United States

      Hilarious. The artificial construct that you expect to come apart in two centuries at most was established by the Act of Union in 1707 when the UK was formed. Wales and England were joined into one kingdom starting back in 1535. We've had an odd period of dissolving nations, mostly in Europe, since the end of the Cold War, but notice that Quebec rejected independence in two plebiscites already and Scotland is likely to reject independence in its own plebiscite, according to all the polls.

      I suppose we can solve the problems with Iran by waiting for the Medes and the Persians to split into two nations? No? Surely they're overdue by now, having been united in 550 BC. Don't hold your breath, though, because one man's Mede is another man's Persian these days.

      -Gareth

    22. Re:France is obsolete today. by HungWeiLo · · Score: 1

      When in Montreal (or Paris or wherever), I learn just enough of the language to butcher it. Badly.

      As their ears bleed from my pillaging of their respective beloved language like nails on a chalkboard, the admission of their excellent knowledge of English usually comes forth quickly.

      --
      There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
    23. Re:France is obsolete today. by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Because even the French aren't that obnoxious.

    24. Re:France is obsolete today. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He did not say that Quebec is France, he said that France is obsolete. Personally, I would have chosen "worthless", or "not a place that any other place should like to emulate" over obsolete, but everyone is entitled to their own opinion.

    25. Re: France is obsolete today. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wales, England, and Scotland

      It's so nice when Northern Ireland is forgotten when people refer to the UK.

    26. Re: France is obsolete today. by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      I've never been to "Whales", but expect it to be quite small as countries go.

      If you ever do, please say hello to President Jonah for me.

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    27. Re: France is obsolete today. by markdavis · · Score: 1

      Most of the rest of the world (at least lay people) don't really consider England, Wales, and Scotland as separate real "countries". They are more like associated nations as one country.

      Similarly, Virginia, New York, and Texas are all separate areas with separate governments, separate culture, separate constitutions, different laws, different climate, and even different dialects. They are states, not countries.

      Wales does not sit on the UN. But the UK does.
      England is not a member of the EU. But the UK is.
      Scotland is not a country of NATA. But the UK is.

    28. Re:France is obsolete today. by gmanterry · · Score: 1

      You Canadians can always do what we Americans have done. If you don't like provisions of your Constitution, just declare it a "Living Document" and throw out the parts you don't like. Make sure that your government is powerful enough to not have to listen to the people anymore and have a court system in your pocket too. We Americans have thrown out the 1st amendment as shown by Arizona trying to discriminate against non Christians with SB1062. They're working hard to throw out the 2nd amendment. The 4th amendment is toast. The Supremes deciding that anywhere within 100 miles of any border or international airport is a Constitution free zone and the government can confiscate any computer they wish without probable cause. That your everything on line is fair game for the NSA... Need I go on?

      --
      Since when is "public safety" the root password to the Constitution?
    29. Re:France is obsolete today. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because even the French aren't that obnoxious.

      Ha ha ha ha ha ha. Said by someone never having lived in Paris.
      Parisians are obnoxious.

    30. Re: France is obsolete today. by mpmansell · · Score: 1

      Well, excuse me for not taking the uneducated opinion of arbitrary people on the Internet seriously.

      While it may come as a shock to you, countries existed before the UN and NATO, and will continue to exist after those organisations are long defunct.

      Perhaps you need to educate yourself a little bit more before insulting 50+ million people with your rubbish and learn that there are countries outside of the UN that are still considered but their inhabitants, and others, to be countries.

    31. Re: France is obsolete today. by mpmansell · · Score: 1

      I didn't forget Northern Ireland. However, we were talking about countries and, if you know something about history, you will realise that Northern Ireland is not a country. or a nation.

    32. Re: France is obsolete today. by mpmansell · · Score: 1

      Amusing but most British know that the correct response to 'England? Where's that?" is "Ah. You're an American. You have my fullest sympathies and I hear there are now therapies to help alleviate the symptoms. Just go to your psychiatrist and ask for a prescription of 'Education'. Hopefully, despite the indications, the FDA haven't yet officially banned it " :)

    33. Re: France is obsolete today. by mpmansell · · Score: 1

      oops, accidentally hit 'submit' before adding that the video was, actually, quite amusing :)

    34. Re: France is obsolete today. by mpmansell · · Score: 1

      I didn't forget Northern Ireland but was talking about countries.

      Northern Ireland is not a country by itself but is usually referred to as a province or region of the UK. There are many in Northern Ireland who consider themselves to be ethnically Irish and who's family lines and roots in that region pre-date the 'invasions' by the English and the Scottish Protestants. It was mostly these 'immigrants' who were concentrated in this area who forced the country to be partitioned in 1921 when the rest of Eire was given independence and became the Irish Free State. In many sporting and cultural events, many Northern Irish residents compete for Ireland, rather than Great Britain or the UK.

      Northern Ireland is a very complex place/issue but, in and of itself, it is not a country

    35. Re: France is obsolete today. by markdavis · · Score: 1

      I am not trying to be insulting, I am just pointing out why many people don't think of England as a "country" in modern times. I think the examples I provided are actually quite relevant. Between us, the one who is actually throwing insults would be you.

      In any case, other international organizational examples that do not recognize England, Wales, or Scotland as "countries" include Interpol, the World Bank Group, CERN, the Commonwealth of Nations, and the World Trade Organization... the list actually goes on and on...

      The United Nations and the vast majority of the world define "countries" as sovereign states. England, Wales, and Scotland (and Northern Ireland) are not sovereign, but the UK is. England and Scotland WERE countries up until the Act of Union 1707 when England merged with Scotland to create "The Kingdom of Great Britain" and THAT country grew with the addition of Wales (and later Northern Ireland). As I explained before, the member entities in the UK are are more like states in the USA or provinces in Canada.

      You may dismiss this information as "rubbish" but that doesn't make it untrue or invalid. And I assure you, I am not uneducated.

    36. Re: France is obsolete today. by mpmansell · · Score: 1

      Telling people that their countries are not countries is insulting and just because you say it isn't doesn't make it right.

      All of the bodies you cite are ephemeral modern organisational groups who will have a terminology to suit their uses and conveniences. Just because they choose to redefine something for their convenience doesn't make it a fact outside of their organisation.

      Your choice of organisations to cite is also very amusing since most of them, except CERN, do have rather dubious reputations in many parts of the World. and I know a great many people, and likely many countries and nations, who would not accept their authority should they try to redefine ideas of nationality and country boundaries. And, frankly, were you really reaching to find something when you included CERN ?

  2. Well, see, the problem occurred in 1974. by Huntr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Language Police"

    Anything after that is kind of irrelevant.

    1. Re:Well, see, the problem occurred in 1974. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, language police is exactly correct, and 1974 is when it happened.

      Quebec has been reduced to a bunch of whining, bitching idiots who believe it should be their right to suppress the rights of others based on their language or religion.

      We've all had official bilingualism rammed down our throats for several decades.

      That you can't realize that the rest of the French speaking world thinks you sound like a bunch of illiterate tools is your problem.

      Official bilingualism in Canada has resulted in the people of Quebec being illiterate in both official languages at the same time, because they can speak neither French nor English in any form recognizable to anybody who speaks either.

    2. Re:Well, see, the problem occurred in 1974. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Freedom fuck yeah!

      Here in ;murrica we'll make English the only language and send out the Freedom Police to make sure everyone is rightspeaking!

    3. Re:Well, see, the problem occurred in 1974. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In America you can set up a shop with signs in any language you want.

    4. Re:Well, see, the problem occurred in 1974. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      What good is being an ethnic nationalist if you don't get to be better?

    5. Re:Well, see, the problem occurred in 1974. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Actually the problem dates back to 1759, with the British not finishing what they started and throwing every last croaking one of the frog bastards out.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  3. much ado about nothing by vux984 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ok, its a stupid law, and I'm not going to defend it.

    But if the Quebec based store is maintaining a website, it needs to have a french translation, and a company's facebook page is little different than a geocities site from 1998, and is just another form of advertising for the company so this is entirely consistent with how the law has been enforced in the past.

    1. Re:much ado about nothing by i+kan+reed · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Should it really, though? If you run a store on a border town, where the majority don't actually speak french, should some demi-nationalists be able to dictate your areas culture?

      It'd be like the rest of Canada forcing the Quebecois to have English everywhere.

    2. Re:much ado about nothing by gandhi_2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "it needs to"

      How fucked up has the world become where everyone gets to decide what a store owner "needs to" do but the store owner.

    3. Re:much ado about nothing by tepples · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If you run a store on a border town

      Then lease or buy land on the other side of the border.

    4. Re:much ado about nothing by geekoid · · Score: 2

      I will. There are a lot of good reasons to have an official language.
      Costs, same expectations, safety, I could go on.
      The french take it too far.
      It's why I think that in order to get a license, or use some services, you should be able to communicate to some degree in English.

      The US is spending many billions of dollar trying to make every in every language.

      Just to be clear, this is about using some government service, and driving. If you want to put all your store signs in Klingon, for all I care. well... I would go to that store, but the point stands.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    5. Re: much ado about nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No that is dumb
      As a business owner he should want to translate his page into French to reach more clients
      either he is a bad business man who is only hurting himself or there is no impact to his business that might say a lot about the "official language" of Quebec.

    6. Re:much ado about nothing by drinkypoo · · Score: 0

      How fucked up has the world become where everyone gets to decide what a store owner "needs to" do but the store owner.

      If you consider a world in which taxes are collected and used to provide infrastructure and governance fucked up, then it's easy to believe that only the store owner should be in charge of what happens within their walls. But if you consider a world in which we provide for one another's basic requirements so that our society can move forward as a whole to be a sensible thing, then you have to agree that people have responsibilities and that they need to be met. You might disagree with this particular responsibility, and I certainly do, but the idea of responsibility remains valid.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:much ado about nothing by i+kan+reed · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm pretty sure your solution is

      A. Retarded, because having land in multiple provinces doesn't exempt you from their laws
      B. Highly impractical, because a border town doesn't necessarily straddle a border
      and
      C. Obviously meant as an stupidly elaborate work-around for an unnecessary situation.

    8. Re:much ado about nothing by SeeSchloss · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your solution, on the other hand, would be... to not observe some laws near borders? That's not how legal systems work.

    9. Re:much ado about nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll defend it! Well, sort of. I probably wouldn't actually vote for a national (or state-official) language myself, but I can see the purpose... if you want to ensure that your population has equal access to something then you standardize that something. We have handicap accessibility laws in the US, language laws seek to do the same thing (not that speaking a foreign language is a handicap); ensure that when people are ensured a relatively consistent experience in some fashion. That there's a likelihood that when you walk down the street, you'll be faced with consistent challenges -- i.e. reading French. If you don't speak French you still have a problem, but you only have one problem. The idea is similar to requiring currency be uniform and accepted everywhere. You can actually sue some corporations for not taking cash (http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/31/5103).

      I'm not saying it's always a good idea, but it's easy to see where people are coming from. The desire to build a cohesive community could easily push people into this sort of decision.

    10. Re:much ado about nothing by CastrTroy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's one thing for the government to have to serve the people in a certain language, it's another thing entirely to force business owners to operate their business in a specific language. If people don't speak the languages offered by the business, then the business either won't survive, due to lack of customers, or it will survive, because there are enough people who speak the language, in which case, they serve their customers just fine. It's amazing that in a multicultural city like Montreal, that it's completely fine for businesses to operate to not speak any English, but against the law for them to not speak French.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    11. Re:much ado about nothing by SJHillman · · Score: 1

      That would actually make more sense, as French-speaking Canadians are five times more likely to know English than English-speaking Canadians are to know French. Outside of Quebec, there's only about half a million native French speakers in Canada and even within Quebec, half of the French-speaking population knows English.

    12. Re:much ado about nothing by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Near a border is a an irrelevant legal distinction. You're in one region or the other. And you have to comply with the laws of that region. And yes, you should have to.

      Nor does it matter if you don't share the politics of those that won democratic elections and made the law.

      They want to defend their culture against the cultural imperialism of the US and their use of the English language. They are quite entitled to do so.

    13. Re: much ado about nothing by AndrewOsiris · · Score: 1

      What is the business is based on teaching French to English speaking people? Then he would not be accessable to his target clientel because they would be unable to understand what he was trying to sell. Just sayin...

    14. Re:much ado about nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      American taxes are used to reward political cronies, start wars in foreign lands, and ferret out dissent. The idea of community responsibility for a business owner should extend to making their customers happy and that's about it. I'd call you a nasty, fascist pig, but you probably already know what you are.

    15. Re:much ado about nothing by Zeromous · · Score: 1

      The data and "storefront" resides on US soil.

      --
      ---Up Up Down Down Left Right Left Right B A START
    16. Re:much ado about nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correct. I'm from, and live in Ontario. None of family or circle of friends speak French. I can somewhat read it, but not speak it at all.

    17. Re:much ado about nothing by i+kan+reed · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, to get rid of laws enforcing cultural hegemonies, which tend to be short-sighted, ineffective, and harmful.

    18. Re:much ado about nothing by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

      The near-border quality was a situational description, not a legal one. I was arguing against the intent of the law, thanks.

    19. Re:much ado about nothing by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 2

      My response to a "request" of this nature would be one word. "NO!"

      Je ne comprende pas!

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    20. Re:much ado about nothing by c-A-d · · Score: 2

      As someone who is from, and living in, B.C., I can confirm that more people speak Mandarin than French here.

      --
      some karma... and kinda lukewarm about it.
    21. Re: much ado about nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or he is a good business man who has made the decision that he/she does not want to invest the time and money to support another language spoken by a rude, ignorant, ill-behaved group that would not frequent his/her business because it is not owned by a member of that rude, ignorant, ill-behaved group. My own opinion based on experience dealing this group ignorant ill-behaved tools

    22. Re:much ado about nothing by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      You failed to read the post you're responding to. The author said the law was stupid. vux984 was, however, saying that if the law is consistent it applies just as much to a company-owned Facebook page as their non-social media Internet advertising.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    23. Re:much ado about nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      From the article, "Eva Cooper owns Delilah in the Parc". She also owns Delilah Glebe, which is in Ontario. Thus, in effect, she does own / rent / lease / has bought land on the other side of the border. The issue of a Quebec born and bread Gestapo still exists.

      The concept is to what jurisdiction does one's FB feed belong to? And does *any* governing body have veto powers when it comes down to what it is that you have to say?

      As for the other comments, check out who supplies the most electrical power to the North-East USA!

      from: http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/where-canada-s-surplus-energy-goes-1.1109321

      Net value of electricity exports to the United States, by province, 2009
        Quebec $1.13 billion
        Ontario $519 million
        Manitoba $321 million
        B.C. $289 million
        N.B. $111 million
        Alberta $8 million
        Saskatchewan $2 million
        N.S. $1 million
        Nfld. and Lab. 0
        P.E.I 0
        All of Canada $2.38 billion

      Soon, you too will have mandatory French speaking electron's, (which spin backwards), wreaking havoc on all your computer systems!

    24. Re:much ado about nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it was my store, that WOULD be the solution. To burden the owner to translate everything on Facebook (even other peoples posts to the wall ??) would be costly enough to move. Then when Quebec doesn't get my tax money any more, "C'est la vie"

    25. Re: much ado about nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      50% (and more, ..there's bilingualism as well) of the population here speaks English!

    26. Re:much ado about nothing by Noishe · · Score: 1

      Nous ne comprendon pas!

    27. Re:much ado about nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, to get rid of laws enforcing cultural hegemonies, which tend to be short-sighted, ineffective, and harmful.

      Aren't you the one who complained about practicality?

      How is it practical for a small business in a border town to do what is necessary to repeal a law? You don't just "get rid of" a law by clapping your hands you know.

    28. Re:much ado about nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My response to a "request" of this nature would be one word. "NO!"

      Je ne comprende pas!

      Tu ne sais pas écrire non plus.

    29. Re:much ado about nothing by scamper_22 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It depends on what your definition of society is.

      Some people view society as little more than a financial transaction with the government. I pay my tax. I get these services.

      Others view society as sharing common values and culture. And this is a feedback loop. Government influences culture and values and people influence government.

      I don't understand the attachment to language, but I know people do. I'm of Indian descent and there are lots of Indians who have a strong attachment to language. Many will say, we need to keep our language. The kids will learn English in school anyways. So I have plenty of exposure to this French way of thinking.

      Quebec, for whatever reason wishes to maintain its culture, which includes the French Language. I think that is a valid goal even if I don't agree with it. But I acknowledge I'm an odd person who doesn't get attached to symbols and I'm a live and let live person.

      Believe it or not, I think white people have a right to their culture as much as all other cultures on Earth. I don't get why white people are so keen on making sure immigrants get to keep their culture while doing nothing to support their own. But whatever... that is a side rant.

      Does it go too far? Maybe. Maybe not. I don't live in Quebec. I live in the evil Toronto. But I certainly don't think invalid for a country/province/area to try and enforce its culture. Maybe it is a losing fight. I happen to think so. I'd much rather try and push culture positively by having quality French based media, controlling immigration... than punitive things like this.

      But I think it is a strange day when people don't think a government has a role in culture of the society it governments.

    30. Re:much ado about nothing by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

      I'm not asking the stupid store to do it. I'm making a case in a public forum, because that influences how democracy makes laws, numbnuts.

    31. Re:much ado about nothing by number17 · · Score: 1

      And then across the border in Ontario there is no language police. You can setup a business where somebody only speaks language X and that's completely fine.

      Please note that the Quebec language police have infected some border towns

    32. Re:much ado about nothing by tepples · · Score: 1

      having land in multiple provinces doesn't exempt you from their laws

      Giving up your storefront in a province with impractical laws frees you from its laws regulating storefronts.

      Obviously meant as an stupidly elaborate work-around for an unnecessary situation

      And an airplane is an elaborate workaround for gravity. Elaborate workarounds are called engineering.

    33. Re:much ado about nothing by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      If you had read and understood my comment, which I regret was not translated into French for your enjoyment, you would know that I do in fact disagree with this law. But uh, preach on! I'll be over here singing.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    34. Re:much ado about nothing by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      I would like to know where you are getting your statistics.

      half of the French-speaking population knows English.

      I would think that ratio would be much higher considering almost all the rest of North America is English

    35. Re:much ado about nothing by N1AK · · Score: 1

      Should it really, though? If you run a store on a border town, where the majority don't actually speak french, should some demi-nationalists be able to dictate your areas culture?

      Yes. It's stupid and backwards but it's a democracy and the people of Quebec are voting for this kind of crap. It wouldn't be anything like Quebecois forcing it on the rest of Canada because this region is part of Quebec and Canada isn't part of Quebec ;)

    36. Re:much ado about nothing by Ken+D · · Score: 1

      I always find it amusing that somehow it is described as the French "defending" their culture against the English "cultural imperialism" when it is the French who use the strong arm tactics to force people to use French who otherwise don't want to.

      My son was bemused when the Russian Olympics featured French announcements. Why not Spanish or Chinese which have each have more speakers than French?

    37. Re:much ado about nothing by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

      Read it again, pal, I think you got confused.

    38. Re:much ado about nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The point is that this store is in Quebec and therefor must follow Quebec law. The fact that it's near the border is irrelevant. If proximity of a border could be used as an excuse to not a follow laws that don't apply on the other side, places like Stanstead (a town that straddle the US/Canada border) would be mess to manage.

    39. Re:much ado about nothing by orgelspieler · · Score: 2

      That might not be how the legal system works in Canada, but there are definitely some countries that have different rules for border towns. For instance, the US government basically ignores the constitution anywhere within 100 miles of a border.

    40. Re:much ado about nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your solution, on the other hand, would be... to not observe some laws near borders? That's not how legal systems work.

      Yes. Some laws are not meant to be observed. This same law goes against the Canadian constitution which is not being observed. Quebec showed that laws are not important and need not be respected.

    41. Re:much ado about nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If you run a store on a border town is what you said, which tepples focused on. You followed his trend and attacked the practicality. I simply followed suit

      Whatever insults you throw at me is an insult at yourself.

      Leaving that aside, your current attempt to make a case in a public forum is also impractical. First, you're posting on slashdot, an American-centric site not exactly known to have much influence in Canadian and certainly not Quebec politics. Second, you post in English instead of French, so you're alienating a lot of francophones in Quebec (who are kinda important if you want to succeed in a democracy, you know?). And finally, those insults. It's a small thing, but most people are of small minds. If you want to win in democracy, you need to win the mob, and appearances matter. Well, unless your strategy is about appealing to radicals who will stick with you no matter what, but that comes with the problem of having to appease those radicals.

    42. Re:much ado about nothing by hypergreatthing · · Score: 1

      I'm fairly sure that facebook servers do not reside in quebec and therefore are not subject to being translated into french first.

    43. Re:much ado about nothing by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...almost all the rest of North America is English

      There's a little country south of the U.S. that might disagree with that...

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    44. Re:much ado about nothing by SJHillman · · Score: 1

      With some allowances for rounding, it's from Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L...

    45. Re:much ado about nothing by i+kan+reed · · Score: 2

      Seriously? You think laws passed by humans are the same as laws like gravity?

      "Hey, black dude, just hide from your master, a great work-around for slavery."
      --tepples, c. 1730

    46. Re:much ado about nothing by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

      And the point I was making is that the law is harmful. Christ. So dense.

    47. Re:much ado about nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It'd be like the rest of Canada forcing the Quebecois to have English everywhere.

      They tried and fail. Canadians can shove their fascist constitution down their own throat. Quebec will never sign that piece of crap and Trudeau can go fuck himself.

    48. Re:much ado about nothing by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 1

      Smells like socialism.

    49. Re:much ado about nothing by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      It's supposed to prevent the creation of English speaking ghettos where the majority of French speakers never go due to the language barrier and a division between the communities is formed. In the UK we require that immigrants pass a basic English language just to get a visa and then have to pass a more advanced one to become a citizen on the same grounds. On the one hand we have had problems with integration, but on the other it is often deeply unfair to natives trying to marry foreigners.

      I don't think forcing businesses is the right approach. Encourage the user of French by all means, but this does seem draconian.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    50. Re:much ado about nothing by cab15625 · · Score: 1

      A significant portion of that $1.13 billion is actually coming from Nfld. and Lab. as a result of a really stupid set of deals negotiated around Churchill Falls back in the 1960's. Quebec never seems to remember that they are screwing Nfld. and Lab. out of millions every year. So, really, those electrons should be speaking Newfy.

    51. Re:much ado about nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Je ne comprends pas!"*
      "Nous ne comprenons pas!"*

      Et maintenant mes yeux saignent...

    52. Re:much ado about nothing by khellendros1984 · · Score: 1

      Well, except for all those Spanish speakers down south, living in a country that's still considered part of North America.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    53. Re:much ado about nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The facebook page isn't *IN QUEBEC* so no, their language police don't have any jurisdiction, and aside from a few Richards that may work for them, they must have no dicks (again, aside from the *DICKS* that work for them) either.

    54. Re:much ado about nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Democratic elections... Where? Democracy requires that a citizen participate in the society equally. Voting is just one small part. You cannot participate when participation and information are not equally shared. You cannot participate when one preaches lies. In Quebec some votes have the weight of 2 (the outlying French speaking areas) and others count as half (densely populated allophone areas).

      30% of the vote does not give anyone permission to change a society or pass laws in a democracy.

      Democracy does not exist. While a good effort was put forward, slowly we are moving further and further away. In the states you are loosing the right to face your accuser and kangaroo courts have appeared where you can be convicted without knowledge that a session was even called (no fly list is an example).

      Irrelevant of what political party is in power and the will of the electorate the agenda is the same. ie: We can all agree that global warming is caused by humans and this discussion is one in which we all agree on, there is little discussion on how to reduce it in political circles. The discussion is on who will have the right to continue polluting and who will become rich in doing so. Quebec is selling carbon credits to California. Why does Quebec have the right to increase its pollution and how did the people in these two states participate in this discussion?

      A government cannot defend a culture of a society by imposing the culture onto them. Culture is created and owned by the people as they see fit. Racists will hide behind culture and use it as an excuse to continue to promote hate and intolerance. There is no defense of culture in Quebec just the promotion of racism.

      We haven't learned anything from WWI and WWII.

    55. Re:much ado about nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually it closer to 45%

    56. Re:much ado about nothing by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      There's this thing called civil disobedience. I don't know if that is a thing in Canada, to be honest, but there it is...

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    57. Re:much ado about nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      English being forced on Quebecois is already done by forcing everyone to have english classes in school.

    58. Re:much ado about nothing by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Completely OT, but your username fits that so well!

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    59. Re:much ado about nothing by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      The population of mexico is 120M. The population of the US is 313M. Even taking mexico into account most of North America speaks English.

    60. Re:much ado about nothing by Bidouleroux · · Score: 2

      First off, French is not a "cultural hegemony" within Canada, it's a minority. And if you lived in Montreal before the language laws came into force, you would have barely believed you were in a province where 90% of the people spoke French: everything was in English, and people were forced to speak it in the workplace lest they lose their jobs.

      The enforcement of a cultural hegemony is exactly why these laws exist. It's just not the French one.

    61. Re:much ado about nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So The Language Nazi's decided to make French the official state language rather using what the majority of North America uses, real smart of them...

    62. Re:much ado about nothing by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      Mexico is still less than 1/3 of the North American population.

    63. Re:much ado about nothing by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 1

      "Most" and "almost all" are rather different statements, you know.

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    64. Re:much ado about nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No dicks? Didn't they move to Colorado and are enjoying the legal pot right now?

      oh right that was the Nordiques... well anyway that is what we used to call them.

    65. Re:much ado about nothing by tepples · · Score: 1

      Even if Facebook isn't under a particular jurisdiction, that doesn't excuse the maintainer of a Facebook page from the jurisdiction in which the maintainer is headquartered.

    66. Re:much ado about nothing by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      How about this. Most North Americans that people from Quebec come into contact with speak English.

    67. Re:much ado about nothing by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that, aside from pure dickwaving, the nationalists' objective is ensuring that, when generation N+1 rolls around, those demographics have shifted a bit, N+2 more so, and so on. Once you reach critical mass, the squelching can be handled in the time-honored social manner; but until that time, state power is just soo much fun.

    68. Re:much ado about nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just called yourself "numbnuts". Well, at least you got something right today. Good job!

    69. Re:much ado about nothing by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

      It's not a minority in the place doing it, which surprise, surprise, isn't all of Canada.

    70. Re:much ado about nothing by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure how to address this point, so I'm just going to say you're probably right.

    71. Re:much ado about nothing by Headrick · · Score: 2

      Given that this article is not about the United States government or its constitution I think a better analogy (if we still want to use the US) would be to look at how certain state-wide laws are inapplicable at border towns.

      Not so long ago you could not buy any alcoholic beverage on Sunday in Massachusetts (at a store, restaurants were exempt). This gave the liquor stores of border towns in northern MA a disadvantage as some folks made their "regular" store just over the border so they need not worry about the day of the week. Even if they didn't use it as their primary source of alcohol on Sunday it was the only solution. So these border towns, which did not cross in to New Hampshire, were allowed to sell on Sundays (I can't recall exactly how many miles you had to be from the border).

      As we gradually eliminate our so called "Blue Laws" in Massachusetts it is now legal to purchase alcohol in MA stores so long at it is after noon.

      I'm in no way defending this law, merely presenting a somewhat analogous situation.

    72. Re:much ado about nothing by khellendros1984 · · Score: 1

      Then you've got the 38 million or so in the US that speak Spanish as a primary language at home, and additional 31 million Spanish-speakers that primarily use English.

      118 million in Mexico, 38 million in the US, and an insignificant number in Canada (under a half million, apparently). 156 million out of a population of some 530 million is about 30%. 70% isn't "almost all". It's "most". Big difference there.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    73. Re:much ado about nothing by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      the US government basically ignores the constitution

      A more accurate description, and less inflammatory therefore less interesting, is "the Border Patrol ignores part of the 4th Amendment".

    74. Re:much ado about nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The french take it too far.

      I don't know anyone in France (I live in France, btw) that considers what the Canadians use to be really "French". Canadian movies have subtitles here. One friend when traveling to Montreal had to ask for someone to switch to English, their accent was so bad.

    75. Re:much ado about nothing by Holi · · Score: 1

      Hey now, hey now, Keep it in Quebec

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    76. Re:much ado about nothing by HungWeiLo · · Score: 1

      Because it was the French that started the IOC. So French and English (and a 3rd host country language) would be made the official languages.

      The Greek flag is always flown as the very first flag, despite them not making a showing in some of the winter games.

      --
      There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
    77. Re:much ado about nothing by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      How about this. Most North Americans that people from Quebec come into contact with speak English.

      That's circular logic: most North Americans that people from Quebec come into contact with are also from Quebec.

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    78. Re:much ado about nothing by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      "it needs to"

      How fucked up has the world become where everyone gets to decide what a store owner "needs to" do but the store owner.

      Yeah. Man, the gubmint came into my shop just last week and told me I had to put English ingredients on my food labels. I said "hey, Mr Gubmint Man, get off my back. This is Thai curry that I imported from Thailand, so the ingredients are in Thai. Stop trying to tell me what to do!

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    79. Re:much ado about nothing by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Well, let's ignore the issue of whether it is the law or not. More importantly, is it a ridiculously stupid law, or merely boneheaded?

    80. Re:much ado about nothing by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      or Ontario, New England States, Atlantic Provinces, online retailers, etc. There is a reason why most Francophones learn English. Quebec is a tiny spot of french speakers in a sea of english speakers. Deal with it instead of trying to preserve a society through legislation.

    81. Re:much ado about nothing by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      If you don't like it, emigrate.

      That's exactly what happened; anglophones deserted Montreal in droves for Toronto.

    82. Re:much ado about nothing by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      or Ontario, New England States, Atlantic Provinces, online retailers, etc. There is a reason why most Francophones learn English. Quebec is a tiny spot of french speakers in a sea of english speakers.

      So what? Wherever you live, you interact more with people in your area than people outside it. There's 200km between Montréal and Ottawa. There's plenty of places in the world where you can cross an entire country in 200km and encounter 3 or more languages in the process.

      Deal with it instead of trying to preserve a society through legislation.

      As a citizen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland domiciled in Scotland, I never legislate on Canadian language matters, nor do I have to deal with it.

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    83. Re:much ado about nothing by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      People in BC are more likely to speak "Australian" that French.

      I wanted a nice relaxing vacation away from my homeland but from Victoria to Vancouver to Kelowna, we darn Aussies were everywhere!

      (Fewer in Tofino, admittedly)

    84. Re:much ado about nothing by vux984 · · Score: 1

      The data and "storefront" resides on US soil.

      The STORE resides in quebec and sells to local residents. So its laws apply there. For better or for worse.

    85. Re:much ado about nothing by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      Language is one of those "use it or lose it" skills.

      Take a trip along the St Lawrence river someday, it's a nice spot. I spent an extended weekend in a quaint town. As a foreigner whose last French class was 25 years ago, my French was fairly basic.

      I met an Anglophone spending her summer vacation working in town, keen to gain some practical experience in the language. I doubt that's common in uprooting oneself for a month or two (when one has a career etc) but certainly rewarding in her case.

    86. Re: much ado about nothing by vux984 · · Score: 1

      What is the business is based on teaching French to English speaking people? Then he would not be accessable to his target clientel because they would be unable to understand what he was trying to sell. Just sayin...

      The language laws do not prohibit the presence of an english version, only that signage be 'primarily in french'.

    87. Re:much ado about nothing by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      It's a struggle that has been going on for 250 years though and in the case of 'draconian' language laws, several decades.

      There's nothing to "deal with". Part of doing business in Quebec is paying lip-service to the French language, something that's been enforced since the 70s.

      But apparently it's front page news to slashdot. :)

    88. Re:much ado about nothing by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      I heard one native Quebecois, born and bred, complaining that someone had mistaken his accent as Belgian. :)

    89. Re:much ado about nothing by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Oh, the universal argument!

      If you don't like Jim Crow laws, emigrate.

      if you don't like Sharia as a constitution, emigrate.

      If you don't like "sodomy" being punished by 10 years in prison, emigrate.

      Fuck that. All humans have universal rights and freedoms, and one of them is freedom of speech, which includes your choice of language to communicate in.

    90. Re:much ado about nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is so stupid a law that it CANNOT be defended! And unless Facebook is based in Quebec, the tongue troopers have no juristiction! Bill 22 needs to be repealed, the tongue troopers need to be disbanded. There is no such thing as french culture, so there is nothing to protect.

    91. Re:much ado about nothing by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      All humans have universal rights and freedoms, and one of them is freedom of speech, which includes your choice of language to communicate in.

      And the official language of Quebec is French. As someone pointed out, these 'repressive' laws have been in place since 1976 - two generations ago, which as I stated, was when mass emigration to Ontario commenced.

      Confected outrage on Slashdot for something that has been the law for nearly 4 decades, amounting to little more than 'frog bashing'. A shop on the Gatineau side of the river ought well be aware of the francophone local laws only this time "it's on facebook".

      If Canadians want freedom of language, Nouveau Brunswick is the only bilingual province.

    92. Re:much ado about nothing by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      And the official language of Quebec is French.

      And there's nothing wrong with that. Most countries in the world have an official languages.

      But very few are behaving in such an assholish manner to people who don't want to speak it all the fucking time.

      It doesn't matter how long a bad law has been a bad law. Jim Crow laws in US were on the books for seven decades when they were finally struck down. And sodomy laws date back centuries in most places.

      And "frog bashing", really? Saying that you can't discriminate against other people by restricting their ability to speak their own language between themselves is somehow bashing you? You sound a great deal like one of those Christian fundie bullies who are "offended" about gay marriage.

    93. Re:much ado about nothing by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      Look through the thread, I was referring to:

      "throwing every last croaking one of the frog bastards out."

      "There are many border regions of Quebec where nobody voluntarily speaks frogish."

      "we speak pretty good Frog, and we have a web-page in Phrog for the Phrog tourists. So I'm gonna take it down (the Phrog version)"

    94. Re:much ado about nothing by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      It must be in a different subthread, because I don't see anything like that going up starting from this post and all the way to the top. It's certainly not something that I would say or condone.

    95. Re:much ado about nothing by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      sorry, I meant the article's discussion.

    96. Re:much ado about nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's only because french was declared as one of the official languages of the olympics... it's a decision that is more about the implication of different countries within world initiatives. It has nothing to do with the Québec language laws. That's rule 24.1 of the olympic charter. Rule 24.2 also says that simultaneous interpretations must be provided in French, English, Spanish, Russian and Arabic. That was related to how different countries were involved it the inception of this sports competition.

      It could be an arguable argument to include Chinese into these official languages on the basis that it has such an important place in world languages, but I'm afraid that in this case it's merely a case of politically correct adaptation to an already existing event. I'm all for it but, it has nothing to do with the place of the french language in Québec...

    97. Re:much ado about nothing by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      Well, pardonneeeeez-moi.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    98. Re:much ado about nothing by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      It only seems like a stupid law to you because you don't share a belief in it's objective. But yours is not the only opinion, and it's not even an important one if you don't live in Quebec. Do you even speak French?

    99. Re:much ado about nothing by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      My son was bemused when the Russian Olympics featured French announcements. Why not Spanish or Chinese which have each have more speakers than French?

      Why should they use English? The modern Olympics were restarted in Greece, and then made into an international event by a Frenchman. and this year held in Russia. Why not cut the English language when not held in countries that have English as their language.

      Your answer is probably - "well more of the world speak English." Well if that's your measure, they should use Chinese rather than English.

      In truth your reason is because you are part of the English language cultural imperialist forces. You were brought up that way, just as you're bringing up your own son to be that way.

    100. Re:much ado about nothing by Ken+D · · Score: 1

      What kind of blinders do you have on? Your head must be inside a cave like area, or perhaps you just like living in areas where the straw is piled high to make straw men out of.

      Did I not say that Chinese has a better reason to be included? The topic of conversation was why french culture / society is always pushing for required french language inclusion. It was not about English, or the merits of it.

    101. Re:much ado about nothing by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Did I not say that Chinese has a better reason to be included?

      You said: ... than French. My point was ... than English.

      The topic of conversation was why french culture / society is always pushing for required french language inclusion. It was not about English, or the merits of it.

      You responded to my post that explained the former by means of American (English language) cultural imperialism. So that is on topic.

    102. Re:much ado about nothing by Zeromous · · Score: 1

      The Facebook page does not. Facebook is international.

      --
      ---Up Up Down Down Left Right Left Right B A START
    103. Re:much ado about nothing by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Part of the weirdness is that the rest of Canada is required to be officially bilingual but not in Quebec. Ie, bilingual road signs in BC but French only road signs in Quebec.

      And the stupid part is that this would apply to a Facebook page. If the owner does not speak French why have the requirement that a French translator must be hired merely to update a Facebook page? What next, on Twitter you reserve 70 characters out of 140 for French?

      There are residents of Quebec, including French speakers, who do not like what the government is doing in an attempt to legislate against a declining use of French. So it is not just a matter of outsiders not understanding the issues.

      Overall it's about free speech.

    104. Re:much ado about nothing by Ken+D · · Score: 1

      You put words in my mouth. I said nothing about English and the Olympics at all.

      You argued about a position you imagined for me. In fact a complete ad hominem attack on an imaginary me and my family. A me that happens to be of French Canadian descent, raised by a French speaking Canadian citizen.

    105. Re:much ado about nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It'd be like the rest of Canada forcing the Quebecois to have English everywhere.

      It is, and this is why we protect our culture and language, if we had use the english way to acheive our goal, they would be blood everywhere in Canada. Try to read more on Louis Riel, Louis-Joseph Papineau. deportation(genocide) and then you'll realize what's the point of the fucking frogs
      .

    106. Re:much ado about nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know, let's vote on it! Oh. They voted to keep the cultural hegemonies.

    107. Re:much ado about nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you believe Quebecois is French?

    108. Re:much ado about nothing by smhsmh · · Score: 1

      Near a border is a an irrelevant legal distinction. You're in one region or the other. And you have to comply with the laws of that region. And yes, you should have to.

      There is a subtle cultural difference between Canadians and USAicans that originates more than two centuries ago.

      In 1775 and the years immediately following, most colonials decided not to comply with the laws of the region and revolted. Our gentle neighbors to the North remained compliant. Some number of those living in revolutionary territory who did not want to revolt emigrated to what is now Canada.

      That voluntary separation has served well, since we've mostly stayed friends and allies since then (except in hockey and curling). Compare the voluntary, amicable, and successful separations of Norway and Sweden, and of Slovakia and the Czech Republic. Compare the century-long mess that was the United States after the failure of separation in 1865. (This is not to imply that successful Southern succession would have been a good thing, but I digress.)

    109. Re:much ado about nothing by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Part of the weirdness is that the rest of Canada is required to be officially bilingual but not in Quebec. Ie, bilingual road signs in BC but French only road signs in Quebec.

      That's not accurate, and there's nothing weird about it at all. The federal government is bilingual. And much like USA states, the provinces get to decide much of their local laws. A minority of them are bilingual, Quebec is French as the official language. The rest are English as the official language.

      And the stupid part is that this would apply to a Facebook page.

      It's not stupid at all. It doesn't apply to Facebook in general. But a page in Facebook is not for individuals, it's for organisations, and you state the nature of the organisation when you set it up. Thus this page is simply a business promotional web-page, and should be treated no different from other such pages on the internet.

      The objective of the legislation is "to make French the language of Government and the Law, as well as the normal and everyday language of work, instruction, communication, commerce and business"

      One of the specific rights is: "The right of consumers to be informed and served in French."

      Therefore, it would be completely wrong if a business promotional page on Facebook were not covered under the law.

      If the owner does not speak French why have the requirement that a French translator must be hired merely to update a Facebook page?

      In the unlikely event that a Quebec business owner did not speak French, they would have to have a French speaker to translate ALL aspects of their business.

      There are residents of Quebec, including French speakers, who do not like what the government is doing in an attempt to legislate against a declining use of French.

      And there are non-catholics in the Vatican. In a democracy, those in tiny minorities don't get their way over vast majorities.

      Overall it's about free speech.

      There are rights other than free speech. Quebec is a majority francophone place. It's people have a right to have official and business communications to them in the official language of the land. They are not to be disenfranchised by being communicated to in a foreign language.

    110. Re: much ado about nothing by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      That's unfair. You left out smelly.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    111. Re:much ado about nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nous ne comprenons pas!

  4. Statist's gonna State by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now if only we can get all those Mexicans to speak Murican!

  5. Perfectly reasonable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She should be made to translate everything into French, learn to enjoy champagne, smelly cheese and foie gras.

    On a side note, any language that cannot survive without being enforced legally should be allowed to diminish naturally.

    What's next? forcing women not to shave their armpits?

    1. Re: Perfectly reasonable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your mixing up your stereotypes. This is Canada not France.

    2. Re:Perfectly reasonable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Enjoy Spanish in the next 50 year, then Chinese in the next 100 years. Of course will wont live that long, so who care if you culture die. You might as well hang yourself now because you are living for nothing.

    3. Re: Perfectly reasonable by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      Although, Quebec is just about the only place in Canada you can get a decent goat's cheese.

      (Sure you can buy it in Vancouver but it's more expensive and says product of Quebec on the label!)

  6. Typical by Kimomaru · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Quebec has some bizarre sensibilities, they're definitely not into this whole people-can-decide-what's-best-for-themselves crap. If you think that's bad, you should see their tax rate - believe it or not, taxes go to supporting these bizarre laws. Anyone under the age of 30 who wants to make a life for themselves, in my oppinion, should live anywhere else in Canada.

    1. Re:Typical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quebec is the greatest country on the planet. Yes, I know it is officially part of the "nation" of Canada.

    2. Re:Typical by Kimomaru · · Score: 1

      There's an unfortunate truth to this statement.

    3. Re:Typical by number17 · · Score: 1

      Anyone under the age of 30 who wants to make a life for themselves, in my oppinion, should live anywhere else in Canada.

      Unless you go to university. Quebec has the second lowest tuition in the country. Somehow McGill classes are taught in English.

    4. Re:Typical by Kimomaru · · Score: 1

      Yeah, definitely. After that, I'd leave the province. Better than wasting away in that insane cold and nonsensical cultural issues. Life's too short.

    5. Re:Typical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canada is not a nation. Canada is a confederation of nations. Quebec is one of the official nation recognised by the parliament of Canada.

      The English speaking population of the 'rest of Canada' are not even a nation under the Canadian constitution. They are only occupying a territory shared among Quebec(which are the original Canadian before this name was robbed from them and a new Quebecois identity had to be invented) and the other first nations.

    6. Re:Typical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean to say the Quackbecers were here before the first nations? Who knew!

    7. Re:Typical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry i live in quebec , i am french and everybody who came here dont want to live . Montreal is actualy one of the best city in the world. And for language policy , dont forget that we are the only french speaking in america , so its normal that government try to keep owner respectfull of this . If you know our storry you'll know that in the 50's we have no right to speak french in public place...

    8. Re:Typical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The purpose of Quebec language laws is to protect the use of French language, not to punish non-French speakers. Canada as a whole does the same thing with CRTC enforced regulation of media. It's an attempt to stop whole encroachment of American culture. Don't see a problem with Canada or Quebec for being protective.

    9. Re:Typical by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      The Acadians were around for a while. But the Quebec folks convinced the British they weren't Canadien enough and deported them to Louisiana.

    10. Re:Typical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone under the age of 30 who wants to make a life for themselves, in my oppinion, should live anywhere else in Canada.

      Unless you go to university. Quebec has the second lowest tuition in the country. Somehow McGill classes are taught in English.

      Quebec gets tons of free money from the feds to pay for this and free kindergarten, etc. If they didn't have this free money coming in from the ROC, tuition would be as high as it is everywhere.

  7. I live in Québec and those law are pretty stu by JcMorin · · Score: 5, Informative

    I live in Québec and because of those law I can't purchase product from the local store because the box is not en French. It happend to me last year where I purchase some headphone (nothing fancy there were even NO paper in the box to explain how to plug it). But since the box wasn't available in French, Best-buy would not have the product, online I could see it but they would refuse to sell it to me if my address was in Québec. So I've went to competitor in Vancouver that is not affected by Québec law and purchase it. Result? The law has remove a sale from my local store and move that else where.

  8. Still Flogging That Horse, Quebec? by mrbene · · Score: 5, Informative

    In the late 90s, I worked at an internet software company in Quebec - we developed software for servers and sold it over the internet. No boxed copies, but your standard suite of services - a knowledge base, online documentation, phone and email access to sales and support staff, all of which was based in the province of Quebec.

    Eventually, we got big enough to be noticed by the Quebec language police. They sent a letter, and then there were phone calls. They provided us with a list of requirements - you must answer your phones in French first, your web site must have all content that is available in English available in French as well, and so on.

    We started costing out the implications of this, especially the confusion of the majority of our international (as in, American) clients. Then someone asked the important question - what happens if we don't comply?

    "Well, you won't be allowed to sell to anyone in Quebec!" came the indignant response.

    From then on, I took so much pleasure in informing the our small number of Quebec government clients that no, they would no longer be able to buy upgrades, tech support contracts, or anything else. The 98% of our out-of-province sales were unaffected.

    Unfortunately, it sounds like Eva runs a brick-and-mortar store, so will need to comply or face actual fines.

    1. Re:Still Flogging That Horse, Quebec? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well According to quebec gouvernement regulation they should not have bought your software in the first place unless they could demonstrate that alternatives in french do not exist.

      Also, They must ask in any contract that your support be in french for them. (I blame the fact that most quebec gouvernement agencys are in quebec city and the level of spoken english there is really terrible.

    2. Re:Still Flogging That Horse, Quebec? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Brick and Mortar is one thing. However, "Delilah" is a proper noun, and thus there is no translation. That is not the problem. Essentially this action decries that anyone who is subject to this law, *must* post in French on FB! (And who's to know where the server is actually located, my guess is that FB doesn't have any servers located in the province of Quebec!)

    3. Re:Still Flogging That Horse, Quebec? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Born there, family goes back many generations, the highest award for artistic achievement is named after one of my relatives... I swore I would never again live Quebec. I go to visit relatives but will never live there again because of those a-holes.

  9. English is illegal in the USA by denisbergeron · · Score: 0, Troll

    Imagine you are somewhere in the USA and someone telling you go fuck yourself and speak Spanish. How are you feeling ?

      Almost every state have law to protect their culture, Quebec is not different than Florida.

    Remember, even if people in Quebec are 75% speaking Québécois, some racist people don't want the business of these people,
    But, then Québec, is the only place in the world where people speak Québécois and the only agnostic country/region in the wolrd (the only place in the wolrd where a real separation between state and church really exist).
    These people have to protect their cultural heritage.
    And Facebook is just another form of advertisement and public image.
     

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une Signature !
    1. Re:English is illegal in the USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But, then Québec, is the only place in the world where people speak Québécois and the only agnostic country/region in the wolrd (the only place in the wolrd where a real separation between state and church really exist).

      BULLSHIT.

    2. Re:English is illegal in the USA by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 0

      Good grief your example is stupid. No state in the U.S. has been able to pass a law making English the official language, yet you are saying that Quebec's law making every business do business in French is the equivalent of laws protecting culture that exist in the U.S.?

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    3. Re:English is illegal in the USA by rikkards · · Score: 1

      Sorry to tell you but overdubbing US made movies into French does not a culture make.

      The Quebec culture is a shadow of what it once was.

    4. Re:English is illegal in the USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imagine you are somewhere in the USA and someone telling you go fuck yourself and speak Spanish. How are you feeling ?

      But in the USA, that somebody would have the right to do so and not face fines because they want to conduct their business in Spanish. I live in Chicago and there are many businesses that advertise and have signs on their storefronts in Spanish. There aren't any laws that say that they have to have English translations that are featured more prominently than Spanish.

      Almost every state have law to protect their culture, Quebec is not different than Florida.

      Can you site any laws in Florida protecting "Florida culture"?

    5. Re:English is illegal in the USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imagine you are somewhere in the USA and someone telling you go fuck yourself and speak Spanish. How are you feeling ?

      You seem to be under the hilarious impression that this never happens. There are many many stores in the USA where the staff doesn't speak Engish, and the signs are in another language. I just don't take it so personally.

    6. Re:English is illegal in the USA by denisbergeron · · Score: 0

      Yeah you're right, we need tougher laws and becoming a country.

      And that's why Quebec made a lot of good movies. in french and even in bilingual.

      The movies we made refleat our country culture (Québec and Canada) not the USA culture, like all movie made in the Canada (like "Porky's" , did Canada made another movie since this one ?)

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une Signature !
    7. Re:English is illegal in the USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True nobody said that the regulation to protect quebec culture where effective. Only that it was the intent. And if you look at the number of quebec film book and music its not so bad

    8. Re:English is illegal in the USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But, then Québec, is the only place in the world where people speak Québécois and the only agnostic country/region in the wolrd (the only place in the wolrd where a real separation between state and church really exist).

      BULLSHIT.

      La laïcité de l'État my dear anonymous coward.
      France is about laic a republic as you can get. Even the US is not that laic. US politicians love to invoke god this, god that in their political discourses etc... You'll never catch a french politician doing that. They're dead serious about the separation of Church and State.

    9. Re:English is illegal in the USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want your country, do it somewhere else. The territory the Quebec PROVINCE resides on belongs to Canada.

      AC from Ontario

    10. Re:English is illegal in the USA by hypergreatthing · · Score: 1

      uhh.... stand your ground?
      I kid i kid, but seriously, it's not hard to perpetuate stupid.

    11. Re:English is illegal in the USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I heard that some school districts in NYC are Spanish speaking, hence teach primarily in Spanish.

      Well, "60 Minutes" had an episode in the 1980's about Rockland Co. in New York State. Many of the residents are Jewish and send their kids to private Hebrew schools. However, the private schools don't have the facilities to make them accessible to handicap students and the cost of doing that was too much for most residents. The county government gerrymandered a section of the Rockland school district and made it a "Hebrew district" and set it up so that Hebrew became to official language in public schools. This way, the now public school could receive funds for handicap students and teach the curriculum in Hebrew.

  10. French? Crazy Gibberish! by Karl+Cocknozzle · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why not translate it into a useful language, like Klingon?

    --
    Who did what now?
    1. Re:French? Crazy Gibberish! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To paraphrase Al Bundy, "Am I alone in hating the french?"

    2. Re:French? Crazy Gibberish! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Professor Hubert Farnsworth: And this is my Universal Translator. Unfortunately, so far it only translates into an incomprehensible dead language.

      Cubert J. Farnsworth: [into the translator's microphone] Hello.

      Translator Machine: Bonjour!

      Professor Hubert Farnsworth: Crazy gibberish!

    3. Re:French? Crazy Gibberish! by Karl+Cocknozzle · · Score: 1

      Professor Hubert Farnsworth: And this is my Universal Translator. Unfortunately, so far it only translates into an incomprehensible dead language.

      Cubert J. Farnsworth: [into the translator's microphone] Hello.

      Translator Machine: Bonjour!

      Professor Hubert Farnsworth: Crazy gibberish!

      Best. Throwaway. Shot. At. The. French. Ever.

      Thanks!

      --
      Who did what now?
  11. If browsers auto-translate pages, what then? by presidenteloco · · Score: 1

    The Chrome browser offers to translate whatever website's text into whichever language my operating system defaults to.

    If all of the common web browsers / smart phones / google glass equivalents start doing this, I guess there will be no more need for this mandatory translation at the source side of things.

    --

    Where are we going and why are we in a handbasket?
    1. Re:If browsers auto-translate pages, what then? by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      Auto translators do not translate text displayed in a graphic.

    2. Re:If browsers auto-translate pages, what then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Chrome browser offers to translate whatever website's text into whichever language my operating system defaults to.

      If all of the common web browsers / smart phones / google glass equivalents start doing this, I guess there will be no more need for this mandatory translation at the source side of things.

      That's not gonna fly because the translations are usually machine translations and are pretty bad.

    3. Re:If browsers auto-translate pages, what then? by paiute · · Score: 1
      --
      If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    4. Re:If browsers auto-translate pages, what then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People who put their text in graphics shouldn't be allowed on the internet. It's rude to blind people.

    5. Re:If browsers auto-translate pages, what then? by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      Good for you if you want to read a computer screen by taking pictures of it with an iPhone. Those translators are not perfect. So browser auto translator + iPhone + app + figuring out when app screws up. That sounds like a kludge to me.

    6. Re:If browsers auto-translate pages, what then? by tgv · · Score: 2

      You're omitting the other if: if the translation is good enough.

    7. Re:If browsers auto-translate pages, what then? by mpmansell · · Score: 1

      So, how much better do you think some humans will translate if their language skills are not very high? Am I the only one who remembers Chinese to English translations from before the days of ubiquitous MLT (let alone today :) ) ?

    8. Re:If browsers auto-translate pages, what then? by Arker · · Score: 2

      "Auto translators do not translate text displayed in a graphic."

      Text displayed in a graphic are only permissible as an alternative the browser may choose to display. The actual text representation must ALWAYS be included using the MANDATORY 'alt' tag. It is never permissible to make assumptions about the capabilities of the user agent, which may or may not have any effective way of displaying graphics. Widespread tolerance for scofflaws on this issue is the single largest source of suck on the internet today.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    9. Re:If browsers auto-translate pages, what then? by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      Who wrote and passed that "law"?

  12. She should charge more by Lank · · Score: 0

    She should have an English page and then a French page on which all the prices are elevated slightly. When asked why there's a difference, she can say it costs more to translate and host more content, thereby increasing her cost of doing business.

    --
    Gotta get me one of these!
  13. Re: And in other news... by AvitarX · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Why wouldn't I think I have that right?

    In the US at least it's a pretty common tradition for immigrants not to learn the local language. My Great Grandparents never really learned English, as it wasn't so useful in Little Italy, the Polish neighborhoods were similar too.

    The attempts to mandate language use in the US are gross, and countries/provinces that do it already are being ridiculous. If your official language doesn't have value to the people that live there, perhaps the problem is not with the transplants.

    --
    Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
  14. Their country - their issue by INT_QRK · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Canada is a democracy. They make their own laws and govern themselves. It is none of my business as an American what they decide to do inside their own borders any more than it's my business what happens in the privacy of my neighbor own home as long as it stays inside their home. Privacy, mmmmkay?

    1. Re:Their country - their issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, no, you can make noise about it if you want, you can complain and yell about it.

      I've got no problem with that. You can do that with any law you want anywhere.

      It's what else you do about it that might be problematic. As reasons to invade Quebec go, for example, it would not be substantial enough.

    2. Re:Their country - their issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Iraq was a democracy that decided it's own laws and governed itself. Before the americans went in with guns and tanks of course...

    3. Re:Their country - their issue by Megol · · Score: 1

      Ya, except that we do not like it any better than you would like being forced to use Spanish.

      Except that is not really comparable. Spanish is actually a useful language that a significant portion of the Earth uses.

      As is French (which I don't speak BTW).

      The US is famous for "liberating" nations. And I do not think there is a better example of the usefulness of an 100 MT atomic bomb than Quebec.

      That depends, if that is where you live I'd agree. The collateral damage would be compensated by the removal of a extremely stupid troll.

    4. Re:Their country - their issue by tgv · · Score: 1

      If you kill someone in your house, is that none of anyone's business?

    5. Re:Their country - their issue by whatthef*ck · · Score: 1

      Canada is a democracy. They make their own laws and govern themselves. It is none of my business as an American what they decide to do inside their own borders any more than it's my business what happens in the privacy of my neighbor own home as long as it stays inside their home. Privacy, mmmmkay?

      Non-Canadians can certainly have an opinion about this stupidity, and call it what it is. What the hell does privacy have to do with it?

    6. Re:Their country - their issue by INT_QRK · · Score: 1

      No. Obviously not. I used to get this same sort of extreme counterpoint when I used to talk to my kids when they were little. I'd discuss some broad concept, then I'd get back an example outlier, something like, "but what if it was there was a Tyrannosaurus Rex blocking your way, then what would you do!" So, I'd often tell them something like, "go brush your teeth....it's bedtime."

    7. Re:Their country - their issue by tgv · · Score: 1

      Don't call it childish; that's bad discussion form. You put an absolute example, that obviously doesn't hold. Your reply only sounds as if you can't take criticism. Formulate more carefully next time.

      And it would have been an excellent time to explain your kids how certain rules can take precedence in exceptional cases. Now you've only taught them that they can just ignore you.

    8. Re:Their country - their issue by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      Non-Canadians can certainly have an opinion about this stupidity, and call it what it is.

      Yeah, but see, here you aren't just expressing an opinion, you're expressing your opinion as unquestionable truth. There is a massive difference between "I think this is stupid" and talking about "this stupidity".

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
  15. Proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Proof that pride is indeed a terrible sin, even if you aren't religious. This attitude is almost as archaic and nasty as people who still insist on interpreting the Book of Genesis literally. Get with the times guys. You're leaving yourselves behind, and looking like infants in the process. Nobody wants to join a culture that nasty, so you're only dooming it to an eventual extinction your own way.

    1. Re:Proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OT. A terrible sin? I guess you are saying that it's better to not stride towards doing a good job that you can feel proud over? Or is there some other urge towards quality which bypasses pride?

      I take pride in how I I have raised my offspring, and most of the time how I service clients. A job well done makes me feel good.

      Sure you can take things too far. As in being too proud to open my eyes and see how I'm causing a bad situation by being too proud. Anything can be taken to some extreme where it is mostly destructive. The whole idea of blanket pride turning into being bad is as nutty as many other religous ideas that are based on who knows what kind of poor understanding of life and livingness such as burning people to test if they are witches and only witches survive. Or to maim and kill all those that have a different view of religion.

    2. Re:Proof by almitydave · · Score: 1

      Two different types of pride. There's nothing wrong with deriving appropriate satisfaction from things you've done, being proud of your kids, etc.

      The second type you describe is what's considered sinful: lacking humility, thinking yourself better than others, elevated (beyond reality) sense of self-importance, etc., hubris.

      It's true that it can be confusing that the same word can have two different senses, but both are not bad. See wikipedia for a better explanation.

      --
      my, your, his/her/its, our, your, their
      I'm, you're, he's/she's/it's, we're, you're, they're
  16. Re:And in other news... by NotDrWho · · Score: 2

    Especially Scott. He's a real dick.

    --
    SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
  17. Just separate already!! by bhv · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Besides the drive from Toronto to Halifax being that much quicker, you can reign over something like facebook.que instead and leave .ca to real Canadians.

  18. Re: And in other news... by NotDrWho · · Score: 3, Insightful

    we all know english people won't make any efforts to learn french even if the live in france directly

    A shit-ton of French students in high schools and colleges across the U.S. would beg to differ, Monsieur.

    --
    SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
  19. Re:My Thank You Note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Va chier connard.

  20. Re: And in other news... by SJHillman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Quebec isn't a country. French or otherwise.

  21. translate this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How do you translate "fuck you" into French?

    1. Re:translate this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you translate "fuck you" into French?

      Try google translate.

    2. Re:translate this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you translate "fuck you" into French?

      It's Je suis un connard.

  22. We are looser, that's it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm a native Quebecers and I speak french, but who care if she have a Facebook page only in english? As far as i'm concerned if she pay her taxes it's all I care about.

    If I start a business and create a website in portuguese and all my signage is in portuguese maybe I will go out of business and it will be just my fault.

    OQLF is a waste of taxpayers money and another thing that make this province so miserable.

    We want a charter to remove rights, we have a language police, others province pay for our social politics. We are a looser province, the Quebec Government want the Quebecers to be looser and ignorant because when a nation is ignorant you can control them far easily and in bonus if you can prevent them speaking another language you can prevent the ignorant french Quebecers to move in another province.

    1. Re:We are looser, that's it. by StrangeBrew · · Score: 1

      Can we just admit that both english and french are stupid languages that should have died out centuries ago in favor of a language where words are spelled out phonetically? As a Canadian, I'm willing to admit Americans are on the right track in dropping useless letters from the spellings of words, and I wish them all the luck in eventually turning english into american, complete with logical, instead of historical, spellings of words.

    2. Re:We are looser, that's it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, I'm ready to admit that english is a stupid language.

    3. Re:We are looser, that's it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can we just admit that both english and french are stupid languages that should have died out centuries ago in favor of a language where words are spelled out phonetically? As a Canadian, I'm willing to admit Americans are on the right track in dropping useless letters from the spellings of words, and I wish them all the luck in eventually turning english into american, complete with logical, instead of historical, spellings of words.

      No, French is not a stupid language. Difficult to learn maybe, but not as difficult as German or Norwegian or Swedish or gasp even Chinese. Get this through your thick mind : cultural diversity is a good thing. No one wants a homogenized culture especially if it is US centric.
      Quebecois love their culture and their langauge. Protecting it is a good thing.

      Americans have difficulty understanding this concept because your country was built as a melting pot. People don't integrate into US society as much as they live in ghettos (little italy, little china, little vietnam etc....).

    4. Re:We are looser, that's it. by David_W · · Score: 1

      ...and I wish them all the luck in eventually turning english into american, complete with logical, instead of historical, spellings of words.

      Check.

    5. Re:We are looser, that's it. by Arker · · Score: 1

      Absolutely not.

      Historical spellings are the only reason English is still a single language that is mutually intelligible (at least in written form) all around the world. It's the key to its success, not a weakness. If we follow your track well we can just look to Latin historically to see what happens. The local street languages will be adapted into faux-literary languages with phonetic spellings, mutually unintelligible. This reduces the global marketplace of ideas that takes place in English today into a number of isolated, smaller exchanges which do not really have access to each other, making us all poorer, and then after some time each of those languages will once again be using historical spellings to hold together the dialects that have been developed anyway.

      Just like French today.

      So no thank you, let's not try to kill the tongue of Shakespeare. Learn to use it better instead.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    6. Re:We are looser, that's it. by Stormy+Dragon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      English does have some nice features. For example it's one of the few languages that doesn't arbitaraily assign genders to non-gendered words. If you want to talk about a table, you don't have to memorize whether someone thousands of years ago decided tables are male or female for no logical reason.

    7. Re:We are looser, that's it. by xaxa · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, if you want to write down the word "table", you have to memorise the spelling.

      Tabul... tabel... taebel... tabol... ah, table.

    8. Re:We are looser, that's it. by StrangeBrew · · Score: 1

      Wax on poetically all you like... then try to explain to a 5 year old that 'sure' is pronounced with a 'sh' sound at the front at watch them look at you like you're a moron. Then watch them try to figure out how to say 'who'.

    9. Re:We are looser, that's it. by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      Historical spellings are the only reason English is still a single language that is mutually intelligible (at least in written form) all around the world. It's the key to its success, not a weakness.

      {citation needed} All versions of English spoken in areas of white native-speaking descent have a very high phonemic similarity. It would not be difficult at all to make a single phonemic spelling that would adequately represent all dialects. There are only a handful of phonemic distinctions that are made only by a minority (WH vs W springs to mind) and even "dropped Rs" are almost never completely dropped.

      If we follow your track well we can just look to Latin historically to see what happens. The local street languages will be adapted into faux-literary languages with phonetic spellings, mutually unintelligible.

      That's a completely spurious comparison. Latin was spoken by the conquerors, and the locals failed to learn it correctly. The Romance languages show the effects of local language interference (eg intervocalic lenition in Spanish, likely a borrowing from Celtic phonology, insertion of e- at the start of many words in French and Spanish, a borrowing from Basque etc). English is in a completely different situation, because the expansion of the British Empire was concurrent with a population boom triggered by the industrial revolution. This gave a massive surplus population to settle the new colonies. Of course, not every colony got the number of native speakers the US, Australia and New Zealand did. If you look at the Carribean, you'll get creoles arising out of English. Listen to African varieties of English. Or Indian. Or the creoles of Oceania, from the relatively English-like Pitkern and Norfuk to the very exotic, like Bislama. These are the varieties that emerged where native speakers were in the minority -- these are the languages that are analogous to the Romance languages.

      So no thank you, let's not try to kill the tongue of Shakespeare. Learn to use it better instead.

      Sayest thou that we should cease to use the present progressive...?

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    10. Re:We are looser, that's it. by Arker · · Score: 1

      "All versions of English spoken in areas of white native-speaking descent have a very high phonemic similarity."

      This is not only not true (scots dialect is as 'white' as you could get and it's quite possibly the furthest outlier in the language) even if were true it would be pointless. Are you really implying that only *white* English speakers contribute to our literature? Please. You cannot be serious.

      "It would not be difficult at all to make a single phonemic spelling that would adequately represent all dialects."

      If it's so easy go do it.

      You'll find that it's not nearly as easy as you think and what you wind up with is not going to be much different from what we use right now.

      That's because the natural way to coherently link the tangled mass of local phonologies together into a single written standard is to walk back the historical developments, providing written phonemes that represent the ancient root from which the diverse modern pronunciations stem.

      You talk about dropped 'r's? That's barely even scratching the surface. There are dozens of different 'r's which are used by different dialects, in different environments, and when 'dropped' they are usually actually converted into another phoneme, or trigger a conversion of a neighboring phoneme...

      "That's a completely spurious comparison. Latin was spoken by the conquerors, and the locals failed to learn it correctly."

      Sorry your scenario is the spurious one. Latin, as in Classical Latin, was spoken as a native language by no one, ever. It was always a literary language.

      Spoken 'vulgate' latin was not a literary language and it was spoken all the way from Romania to Brittania at one time. The differences that develop have nothing to do with errors or failure to learn correctly just normal language change processes that affect all vernaculars. The vulgar remained mutually intelligible at first under the shared influence of the literary Latin but as that fell out of use and was replaced with new literary languages derived from local vulgar usage, the gluing influence of the shared literary form was lost, and the divergence accelerated.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    11. Re:We are looser, that's it. by TranquilVoid · · Score: 1

      Gendered words have the purpose of reinforcing the sound of the word or phrase, like alliteration, since typically the gender of nouns and articles/adjectives agree. The notion of gender loses meaning when applied to neutral things like cars, but the assignment is typically done based on the spelling of the word, not arbitrarily.

    12. Re:We are looser, that's it. by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      "All versions of English spoken in areas of white native-speaking descent have a very high phonemic similarity." This is not only not true (scots dialect is as 'white' as you could get and it's quite possibly the furthest outlier in the language)

      When I say "versions of English" I mean "versions of Modern English". Scots is a language that diverged from English at the very beginning of the Middle period, if not before. "English" as we know it didn't exist then.

      even if were true it would be pointless. Are you really implying that only *white* English speakers contribute to our literature? Please. You cannot be serious.

      Sorry, I missed a vitally important word there: "areas of majority white native-speaking descent". My point is that in areas where colonists were in the majority, English was preserved more or less intact, and the imported slaves, the free immigrants and the locals learned from their pattern. The children of the non-natives then still had exposure to the native pattern, and spoke better than their parents. In such a situation, the non-native errors disappear within a couple of generations (you can see this in any immigrant community in any country and any language).

      I was using white as a shorthand, because when you go to India or Oceania, you can see immediately that the population isn't descended from the colonists by the colour of their skin, and their English is markedly different, because it has turned what began as non-native errors into a part of their language variety.

      There are even areas in the US where true "communities" persist based on colour, and there -- guess what? Strong dialectal differences persist, and black speech even has its own name: ebonics. These modes of speech are in no way inferior to standard English, but sadly society as a whole judges them to be so.

      So no, I'm not saying that only white English speakers contribute to English-language literature. I am not racist (although my poor wording may have suggested otherwise). I was simply pointing to the fact that the ratio of native speakers to non-natives is what determines whether the language changes or remains the same.

      That's because the natural way to coherently link the tangled mass of local phonologies together into a single written standard is to walk back the historical developments, providing written phonemes that represent the ancient root from which the diverse modern pronunciations stem.

      You talk about dropped 'r's? That's barely even scratching the surface. There are dozens of different 'r's which are used by different dialects, in different environments, and when 'dropped' they are usually actually converted into another phoneme, or trigger a conversion of a neighboring phoneme...

      "Dozens of different 'r's"... but they are all still Rs. If I write R, I don't care which R you use, I happily recognise it as an R. That's what a phoneme is -- it's a meaningful unit of sound that can be pronounced in multiple different ways. When the R reduces to the point that it turns the vowel before it into an "eugh" sound, it's still an R. I could write it as R, as , as , as &*, as anything -- it would still be one phoneme.

      The mismatch between the written form and spoken is pretty much identical everywhere. The OU in "you" preserves an old form, but it's different from almost every other OU -- out, shout, etc. Rewriting "you" as "yoo" would not favour any dialectal variation over any other.

      Sorry your scenario is the spurious one. Latin, as in Classical Latin, was spoken as a native language by no one, ever. It was always a literary language.

      Spoken 'vulgate' latin was not a literary language and it was spoken all the way from Romania to Brittania at one time. The differences that develop have nothing to do with errors or failure to learn correctly just normal language change processes that affect all vernaculars

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    13. Re:We are looser, that's it. by dolmen.fr · · Score: 1

      And we are not even speaking about languages that choose that table is neither male or female, but neutral.

    14. Re:We are looser, that's it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've always wondered about this, having decided that, while I was fairly good at guessing what a word would be in a couple of gendered languages that I've studied, I found the concept rather silly.

      I imagine it can make a language sound more musical (Spanish)...

      Or not (Russian).

      Nevermind.

      -- Sysrammer

  23. Re: And in other news... by SJHillman · · Score: 2

    To extend this, I've known plenty of people who have lived in Asian countries (for at least a few years) but never really picked up the language. It's one of the advantages of being a native English speaker... you can go almost anywhere on Earth and find people that know enough English for you to live day-to-day life. The only things you really need to pick up are words and phrases with no direct translation.

  24. Please inform yourself by denisbergeron · · Score: 1

    http://www.languagepolicy.net/...
    read pass the first page, you will get a lot of information about language laws in the USA and you will stop looking like a idiot.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une Signature !
    1. Re:Please inform yourself by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      read pass the first page, you will get a lot of information about language laws in the USA and you will stop looking like a idiot.

      Okay, I did.

      Oddly, I didn't see anything requiring that anyone but the Government use English as the "official language".

      A bit different than Quebec, eh?

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    2. Re:Please inform yourself by denisbergeron · · Score: 0

      unfortunly you didn't read pass the first page you should be an angryphone reading only the big title in the NationalPost

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une Signature !
    3. Re:Please inform yourself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >angryphone
      Shut the fuck up, nerd.

    4. Re:Please inform yourself by denisbergeron · · Score: 1

      Oh look another angryphone, this time completly coward !

      then for the uniformed, angryphone is the name of racist people in Quebec that hate the fact that Quebecois are a majority in the province but a minority in Canada, and they don't care that Saskatchewan and Alberta have the same kind of language laws but again the 0,01% of french speaking people living there

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une Signature !
  25. "It's a stupid law, I'm not going to defend it"... by mmell · · Score: 1
    ...and then you defend it. Whaddya mean, "if the Quebec based store is maintaining a website, it needs to have a french translation"? So . . . if I create a website which I intend to be read in Berlin, or Pamplona, or Rome . . . it still has to be in French?

    Never mind the argument . . . I give up.

  26. Why so defensive about French? by sjbe · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How fucked up has the world become where everyone gets to decide what a store owner "needs to" do but the store owner.

    Oh you mean we shouldn't require people to keep their storefront clear of trash? We shouldn't require them to pay their employees? How about we let them dump hazardous chemicals wherever they want? Look, this language law is stupid both morally and economically but let's not expand the stupidity by claiming that every requirement a business is subjected to is dumb. Some are very good ideas and others not so much. This language law falls into the not so much category.

    What I'm confused by is why both France and Quebec are so damn defensive about their language. It's not anything special.

    1. Re:Why so defensive about French? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Well the French and the English have had their centuries of fighting each other for political and social dominance.

      In short the English Won. However the French while military peaceful with the English will refuse to give up any social dominance they might have.

      We see this in America. as Hispanics are growing, there is a massive push back to make sure that "'Merica don't be a Spanish Speaking country"

      In short the French still see English as a bunch of barbarians, and they feel that they must keep civilization in spite of their dominance.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    2. Re:Why so defensive about French? by gandhi_2 · · Score: 1

      storefront clear of trash

      if it spills into the public property, then there is a problem. if the trash is completely on the stores property, the market will likely take care of it.

      require them to pay their employees

      the deal worked out between the person selling labor and the person buying labor is between those parties, and not your / our / my business.

      dump hazardous chemicals wherever

      again, if the chemicals get off the property then we have a problem. if the chemicals stay on the property, not your / our / my problem.

    3. Re:Why so defensive about French? by c-A-d · · Score: 1

      France really isn't. They don't perceive any sort of attack on their culture and every one of their neighbours speaks a different language (except Belgium, which speaks French). Quebec, on the other hand, is smack dab in the middle of an English speaking CONTINENT. All their neighbours speak English and they perceive any anglo encroachment as an attack on their culture. The Supreme Court of Canada has ruled Bill 101 and other language laws as unconstitutional, but by invoking the Notwithstanding Clause they are able to ignore that ruling.

      Personally, I think all anglos should run, not walk, to an english speaking jurisdiction. Let Quebec die under the weight of their language storm troopers.

      --
      some karma... and kinda lukewarm about it.
    4. Re:Why so defensive about French? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a stupid fucking rebuttal. What kind of idiot takes the context of forcing a business to speak a language to be somehow equivalent to chemical pollution and slavery? One is talking about a government taking way an individual liberty and the other is an individual harming others.

      Lets try not to make such unintelligible asinine arguments.

    5. Re:Why so defensive about French? by vux984 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Alright... how about a business that discriminates against blacks? Or the disabled?

      if the trash is completely on the stores property

      Will the extra rats the trash attracts also stay on the stores property?

      the market will likely take care of it.

      How so? A restaurant can maintain a presentable dining room whilst maintaining a disgustingly unsanitary kitchen and food storage areas. The market might take care of it eventually, but how many people need to get sick (even die) before the 'market' catches on.

      again, if the chemicals get off the property then we have a problem. if the chemicals stay on the property, not your / our / my problem.

      Even if they are harmful to the employees?

      the deal worked out between the person selling labor and the person buying labor is between those parties, and not your / our / my business.

      So locking them in at night so they can't escape a fire is ok, or working with hazardous chemicals without adequate safety equipment is fine too (as above) as long they were desperate enough for food to feed their family to agree to those terms?

      The market has long track record of ensuring the wealthy capitalist who owns the property and the means of production doesn't take advantage or abuse the fact that he tends to have a massive advantage* when negotiating wages and working conditions right?

      That advantage being that he can generally easily afford not to hire someone today; and his business will continue to run and earn him money. Whilst a potential employee needs to eat and provide himself shelter each day, whether he works or not. Its only when employees band together into some sort of 'united front' that they can negotiate on the same level... but these united fronts for negotiation, or 'unions' are the root of all evil I'm sure.

    6. Re:Why so defensive about French? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      France really isn't. They don't perceive any sort of attack on their culture and every one of their neighbours speaks a different language (except Belgium, which speaks French). Quebec, on the other hand, is smack dab in the middle of an English speaking CONTINENT. All their neighbours speak English and they perceive any anglo encroachment as an attack on their culture. The Supreme Court of Canada has ruled Bill 101 and other language laws as unconstitutional, but by invoking the Notwithstanding Clause they are able to ignore that ruling.

      Personally, I think all anglos should run, not walk, to an english speaking jurisdiction. Let Quebec die under the weight of their language storm troopers.

      Not entirely true. France has a whole lot of laws and regulations which enable french culture (the so called french cultural exception) to thrive despite a massive assult by English cultural products. So for instance every item sold in France has to have a french instruction booklet. In this respect it isn't different from Quebec. Another one is the time that is allocated to foreign products/films/fictions on tv. A certain amount of time has to be devoted to trasmitting french sitcoms/films etc... Then there are taxes that are used to finance french cultural products. French as a language has traditionally accepted foreign words, but when there is an acceptable french term that that is prefered over the foreign one. So for instance computer -> ordinateur, walkman-> baladeur, hard drive-> disque dur, email -> courier électronique or courriel and so on and so forth. All of these measures are taken not because we hate english or english films etc.. but because we want to maintain our identity. And language is a fundamental component of a nation's identity.

    7. Re:Why so defensive about French? by DutchUncle · · Score: 1

      We see this in America. as Hispanics are growing, there is a massive push back to make sure that "'Merica don't be a Spanish Speaking country"

      The Quebecois point out that the area was settled first by France (neglecting the minor problem of all of the natives already there), and that in fact the French made an end-run around the English settlements down the Mississippi River all the way to the southern border at New Orleans (which is why the early US had to buy all that land as the Louisana Purchase). Quebec only started speaking English when English armies took it over by force.

      Similarly, the US was founded primarily by English-speaking British colonies, which is why it speaks English - so dominantly that nobody ever thought to make it a rule, because it was simply *assumed*. All of our founding documents are in English. In earlier times, like when my own mother and grandparents arrived here, it was assumed that one adapted to the language of the country one had moved to rather than insist that the country's government adapt its language to every disparate immigrant. It's one of the things that distinguishes the people of a "country" together as a group.

      As to why French is supposedly the language of diplomacy and international discourse . . . good salesmanship? :-)

    8. Re:Why so defensive about French? by gandhi_2 · · Score: 1

      Uh oh!

      owns the property and the means of production

      Looks like we have a marxist!
      Now.. what were you saying about a long track record of people being locked in, unable to escape the one-party system, the gulags, and the purges?

    9. Re:Why so defensive about French? by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Looks like we have a marxist!

      Hardly. but...

      Now.. what were you saying about a long track record of people being locked in, unable to escape the one-party system, the gulags, and the purges?

      That's got nothing to do with anything actually. Those issues are not even related to 'communism'. There is nothing inherent in communism that requires a one-party system nor even suggests its a good idea.

      Not that I think communism is a workable solution, I don't. I am not a marxist at all. I do however support the concept (if not the manifesation of unions) but my distaste for modern unions mirrors my distaste for modern corporations.

      But in any case pointing at corrupt one-party-system and calling it a failure of communism is like pointing at Saudi Arabia and saying 'that's what you get with capitalism'.

    10. Re:Why so defensive about French? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with hardline free market thinking like this is that for a perfectly free market to function, all the actors require perfect information about all factors. Unless there's a sign that says "employers unpaid and abused" at the door, it might be impossible to know the employees' working conditions, and that's even more relevant to hazardous chemicals. Do you understand all the externalities that a trash pile can cause on its surroundings? Do you even want to?

      For most people who want a service or product, the answer is no. Perfect education on every purchase is impossible. That's why free market extremists sound like idiots.

    11. Re:Why so defensive about French? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      There were colonies in the Americas that later became a part of the US which did not speak English. Which is one reason why English was not made an official language. There were those who did want to make English a rule and it was not simply assumed at first. However there was a lot of moving around and small pockets of non-English speakers adapted over time. The English dialect and manner of speaking along the east coast was remarkably uniform despite the colonization from various parts of England and Europe.

    12. Re:Why so defensive about French? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I'm confused by is why both France and Quebec are so damn defensive about their language. It's not anything special.

      All I can think of here is "This is America. Speak English!". Being defensive about language isn't limited to the French.

    13. Re:Why so defensive about French? by sjbe · · Score: 1

      The Quebecois point out that the area was settled first by France

      A historical curiosity. Nothing more. Has very little to do with modern language and communication needs.

      As to why French is supposedly the language of diplomacy and international discourse . . . good salesmanship?

      French hasn't been the language of diplomacy and international discourse for a hundred years. English has assumed that role for better or worse. "Lingua Franca" is just an expression rather than a reality now.

  27. In any other place this would be act of racism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    like if you forbid a store owner of kosher food having a sign in Hebrew, or one store owner of halal food having a sign in arabic...

  28. Facebook hosted in Quebec? by Zeromous · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Facebook is an American storefront, not a Quebec one. I did not read the article but this seems very wrong indeed.

    --
    ---Up Up Down Down Left Right Left Right B A START
    1. Re:Facebook hosted in Quebec? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are right in this, Québec law should not be able to apply here BUT, since you are a company in Québec, i would guess that you would want the 75% of french people to come to your website and have a translation not because a law dictates it but because COMMON SENS does.

      And it's not the language police it's the Office of french language and it exist primarly because a minority of English ASSHOLES wanted all the money and power and tried to screw over the majority of the people living there in the past.

      Anyway, the Official languages in Canada are English AND French, there are idiots in that office for sure but have that law and other because the federal wont help on that matter.

    2. Re:Facebook hosted in Quebec? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm glad you're not my lawyer.

    3. Re:Facebook hosted in Quebec? by number17 · · Score: 1

      it exist primarly because a minority of English ASSHOLES wanted all the money and power and tried to screw over the majority of the people living there in the past.

      Your history book seems to be missing the first couple of chapters.

    4. Re:Facebook hosted in Quebec? by Punko · · Score: 1

      "...people living there in the past."

      That's the problem in Quebec. Too many of the Pequists do live in the past. They are trying to hold Quebec back from evolving like the rest of the world. When the premier of Quebec states in public that saying "bonjour, hi" as a greeting in a store with a bilingual clientele is unacceptable (as the entire greeting must be in French, in her mind), she is clearly not functioning in the real world.

      --
      If only we could fall into a woman's arms without falling into her hands
    5. Re:Facebook hosted in Quebec? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      There are many border regions of Quebec where nobody voluntarily speaks frogish.

      If Quebec secedes, many border regions of Quebec will secede from Quebec.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    6. Re:Facebook hosted in Quebec? by Zeromous · · Score: 1

      First of All your history is wrong. Second of all I live in a Quebec border town. Third of all, just because a business resides in Quebec and maintains a Quebec storefront, doesn't mean your Facebook is your Quebec storefront, or even service.

      If I wanted a Brazillian storefront, I'd put up a similar page on Orkut.

      --
      ---Up Up Down Down Left Right Left Right B A START
    7. Re:Facebook hosted in Quebec? by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      Maybe I'll open an Australia bar in Montreal.

      "G'day, ami".

      When the language police come a knockin', I'll explain "G'day" is a traditional greeting in Australian French.

  29. Slashdot, vous êtes en violation by paiute · · Score: 1

    "Au Canada, la province de Québec a sa Loi sur les langues officielles de 1974 (aka projet de loi 22) qui fait du français la seule langue officielle. Elle a notoirement été utilisé pour forcer les propriétaires d'entreprises à modifier la signalisation de donner pré-eminance français sur les autres langues. maintenant, la police de la langue du Québec semblent être d'étendre leur portée à Facebook Eva Cooper possède Delilah dans le Parc -.. une boutique à Chelsea, Québec, près de la frontière Québec / Ontario Elle a reçu une lettre du bureau de la langue en lui disant de tout traduire affiché sur la page Facebook de son magasin en français ".

    Jésus H. Christ, l'homme. Si la Sûreté du Québec nous bien pour ce que nous pourrions ne pas être en mesure de payer la conversion de bêta!

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    1. Re:Slashdot, vous êtes en violation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mais quel con ! Depuis quand Slashdot opère du Québec ? Pis si une personne opère une boutique à Chelsea en se foutant du français, elle n'aura AUCUNE sympathie de ma part, merci.

    2. Re:Slashdot, vous êtes en violation by paiute · · Score: 1

      N'avez-vous pas encore vu l'incarnation de la bêta? Il a été codé par cinq Inuits dans un igloo en dehors de Chibougamau.

      --
      If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    3. Re:Slashdot, vous êtes en violation by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

      Mais quel con ! Depuis quand Slashdot opère du Québec ? Pis si une personne opère une boutique à Chelsea en se foutant du français, elle n'aura AUCUNE sympathie de ma part, merci.

      I've spent a lot of time in Chelsea but I'm yet to hear anyone speak French there other than my kids.

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
  30. Re: And in other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unfortunately the Québécois don't understand that Quebec is a province of Canada and act as if Quebec IS part of France and DEMAND they be treated as such. They are ignorant tools and need to be treated as such.

  31. Oblig. "The Critic" by barlevg · · Score: 2
  32. Re:I live in Québec and those law are pretty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'd encourage you to bring this matter to the public eye. Specifically, in French. That it is stiffling local business, should be a concern. That the police are treating it with enough importance as to attack someones Facebook page, is also a bit disturbing. I can see their justification for not wanting 'English' to take over, but legislating over it, making it mandatory, is rather myopic in the scheme of things. It's probably a safe guess this was passed initially out of fear, rather than heritage.

    Of course, I'd also like to see them 'force' this in a court of law. What you can and can't do online, as opposed to a physical location area, are 2 different arenas, and the court should acknowledge that fact.

  33. Re: And in other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Meanwhile, in other parts of Canada, people come here and talk Tagalog (Philippines), Chinese, Korean, Hindi, Farsi, German, Ukranian, Polish, Spanish, Cree, Blackfoot, even English. We try to accommodate people and welcome new people. I personally love Thai, Vietnamese and Mexican food. If a Chinese restaurant wants a big sign in Chinese, I welcome the big Chinese sign. Poor Quebec: Insular, Inbred. Under the impish belief that their culture is superior to all others, they are stupid enough to try and enforce it by law. Others are cosmopolitan. They are insular, unrefined, parochial. Perhaps they don't even realise how stupid they look to the rest of the world.

  34. Re: And in other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck you and fuck quebec. I would not shed a tear if quebec was bombed off the face of the earth.

    Said every other person in Canada. No one wants Quebec.

  35. Don't Comply by Froggels · · Score: 2

    Too many people equate "The Law" with morality and consider it a forgone conclusion that whatever "The Law" states must be adhered to, and if violated must be enforced at all costs. Unfortunately there exist just too many unjust, absurd, horrific, ridiculous, and outdated laws such as, Jim Crow, Apartheid, FATCA, the Patriot Act, FATCA, the Nuremberg Laws, .....compulsory TV licensing *even if you don't have a TV*.... Most people who are negatively affected by such laws are usually met with derision and marginalized and told to suck it up by the majority of society simply because "It's the law!". It's a shame that we all live in societies that have placed "the Law" above justice and common decency.

    1. Re:Don't Comply by Shados · · Score: 1

      The problem with that (and its seen too often in the US, and many other countries), is that if not complying with the law is a frequent option, reasons to get rid of bad laws become much fewer. So you end up in a world where there's a ton of irrelevant laws, and no one really knows which ones are important, which ones aren't, the reason behind them, and even lawyers have to shuffle through a billion laws. People can be arrested for anything and everything, etc.

      Even worse, each and every individual then use their own personal moral to decide, and without good background information, that will be wrong more often than not.

      Common sense is not a common thing. Laws need to be maintained, reviewed, and updated. If you just ignore the ones you don't like, that will not happen.

  36. Re:I live in Québec and those law are pretty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So what, let them suffer.

    The people that are silent about laws , are de facto, supporting it in effect.

    Let them lose sales.

  37. Re:And in other news... by c-A-d · · Score: 1

    I think you mean Jacques. He's the dick from Quebec. Scott lives in Toronto.

    --
    some karma... and kinda lukewarm about it.
  38. Re:I live in Québec and those law are pretty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    J'ai du mal à saisir le rapport avec le message parent. Sans compter que les termes sont un peu crus.

  39. Why follow stupid laws? by sjbe · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Near a border is a an irrelevant legal distinction. You're in one region or the other. And you have to comply with the laws of that region. And yes, you should have to.

    Even if those laws are morally wrong or economically stupid? Just because it is a law doesn't make it a good idea nor does it mean that you should automatically comply with a stupid and pointless law. Fight the good fight if it is worth fighting. I know plenty of businessmen (including some of my family) who refuse to do business in France because of the burden of this language law.

    They want to defend their culture against the cultural imperialism of the US and their use of the English language.

    Passing laws like this will not "defend their culture". It merely hurts them economically, makes them look stupid to the rest of the world, and at best delays the inevitable changes that will occur. Furthermore, the VAST majority of Canada (you know, the country they are part of) speaks English as their primary language so your argument that this has anything to do with the US is bogus on the face of it. Just because you speak a different or additional language doesn't mean your culture has to change in any significant way. They can still speak French all they want. But if people want to speak or otherwise communicate in a different language then that should be their prerogative. Not much of a democracy if you can't speak in your own voice with your own language.

    1. Re:Why follow stupid laws? by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      Passing laws like this will not "defend their culture". It merely hurts them economically, makes them look stupid to the rest of the world, and at best delays the inevitable changes that will occur.

      I bow to your superior knowledge of language dynamics. Shall I tell my university lecturers that they were all wrong then?

      Because, you see, it has been seen time and again that if there is one language you can use everywhere, and one that is optional, people use the one you can use everywhere. Before the language laws, people were shifting to English, because there was the expectation and/or fear of not being understood. This has been reversed. By comparison, you have the minority regional languages of France, where only French is official. Without legal protection, the loss of expectation of language means even people that are perfectly competent in speaking the local language tend to use the majority language with each other. Quebec's language policy is working very well, thankyouverymuch, and if you think they look stupid for doing it, well, they think you're pretty damned arrogant for deriding them for refusing to be like you.

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    2. Re:Why follow stupid laws? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Because, you see, it has been seen time and again that if there is one language you can use everywhere, and one that is optional, people use the one you can use everywhere.

      And that is a problem why, exactly?

      English is not my native language. Yet I did learn it, and I use it in many places, sometimes even my native language might potentially also work. I don't see a problem with that.

      Languages don't have right, people do. When you force people to not use a certain language, you're infringing on their rights. When you're giving them a free choice in the matter, but they tend to pick one option over the other more often than not, it's their choice.

    3. Re:Why follow stupid laws? by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      Languages do not have rights -- correct. People do -- correct. It was not the language that asked for itself to be defended, it was the people that asked for it to be defended.

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    4. Re:Why follow stupid laws? by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Even if those laws are morally wrong or economically stupid? Just because it is a law doesn't make it a good idea nor does it mean that you should automatically comply with a stupid and pointless law. Fight the good fight if it is worth fighting. I know plenty of businessmen (including some of my family) who refuse to do business in France because of the burden of this language law.

      Easy and small minded to say when your language is the majority one that's killing others.

      Passing laws like this will not "defend their culture".

      It's not unique to Canada and France. For example Wales uses it for the Welsh language. And it works. Welsh was on the verge of dying out. But legislation to make all official materials and signage to be in Welsh first has reversed the trend. Your opinion is wrong.

      Furthermore, the VAST majority of Canada (you know, the country they are part of) speaks English as their primary language so your argument that this has anything to do with the US is bogus on the face of it.

      You must be American. Everyone in the world understands the reality and pressure of US cultural imperialism, except for the Americans themselves. It's hard to see imperialism when you come from the country that's doing it. Even if you travel, you simply won't see how much your country's culture has invaded, because familiar things are mostly invisible to you. You tend to notice only the differences.

      It was the same in previous centuries with the British empire's imperialism. Those back home didn't understand it's effects, and certainly couldn't see anything wrong with it. Americans and the other colonies could though.

    5. Re:Why follow stupid laws? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was someone coming to steal their dictionaries?

    6. Re:Why follow stupid laws? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For example Wales uses it for the Welsh language. And it works. Welsh was on the verge of dying out.

      It was artificially resurrected and I really wish it hadn't been.

    7. Re:Why follow stupid laws? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      You don't defend your rights by stomping over the same rights of other people.

    8. Re:Why follow stupid laws? by sjbe · · Score: 1

      I bow to your superior knowledge of language dynamics. Shall I tell my university lecturers that they were all wrong then?

      If they are claiming that this law is a good idea then go ahead and tell them they are idiots.

      . Before the language laws, people were shifting to English, because there was the expectation and/or fear of not being understood.

      Languages change and that is not a bad thing. So what if people were choosing to shift to English? If they were it was because that made sense for their situation. I sure as hell don't want anyone legislating what language I choose to communicate in. If that happened to be French then fine but the government has NO business mandating that for private businesses or individuals.

      By comparison, you have the minority regional languages of France, where only French is official. Without legal protection, the loss of expectation of language means even people that are perfectly competent in speaking the local language tend to use the majority language with each other.

      Again, so what? If that is what people choose to do then the government should let them do it.

      Quebec's language policy is working very well, and if you think they look stupid for doing it, well, they think you're pretty damned arrogant for deriding them for refusing to be like you.

      "Working fine"? Says who? Cultural snobs in Quebec? I don't give a shit if they want to be like me or not. What offends me is that they think they should dictate how their own people should be allowed to communicate. If keeping French is such a cultural advantage then it needs no protection. If it isn't then let it go and move on.

    9. Re:Why follow stupid laws? by sjbe · · Score: 1

      It was not the language that asked for itself to be defended, it was the people that asked for it to be defended.

      SOME people. I guarantee you that this wasn't unanimous, so you are trampling some people's rights for others opinions.

    10. Re:Why follow stupid laws? by CHIT2ME · · Score: 0

      Francais.......sucks!!!

      --
      My karma is bad. Don't get too close!!!
    11. Re:Why follow stupid laws? by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      Welcome to democracy.

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
  40. Re:I live in Québec and those law are pretty by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 0, Troll

    I live in Québec and because of those law I can't purchase product from the local store because the box is not en French. It happend to me last year where I purchase some headphone (nothing fancy there were even NO paper in the box to explain how to plug it). But since the box wasn't available in French, Best-buy would not have the product, online I could see it but they would refuse to sell it to me if my address was in Québec.

    So I've went to competitor in Vancouver that is not affected by Québec law and purchase it.

    Result? The law has remove a sale from my local store and move that else where.

    Yes, yes, we all remember the news stories about The Great Lost Headphone Sale of 2012. We don't need to be reminded about that calamity.

  41. Joke alert. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The owner just needs to say a firm "No." and hope that the Quebec Language Police throw down their guns and surrender.

  42. Re: And in other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe the rest of Canada would be more receptive to french if Quebec wasn't trying to eradicate english inside Quebec (which is still part of Canada btw..). Unfortunately, Quebec thinks that the rest of Canada should learn french and be bilingual while they want to only have one language-- french. Fuck that.

  43. Languages tend to converge by sjbe · · Score: 2

    I will. There are a lot of good reasons to have an official language. Costs, same expectations, safety, I could go on.

    Most places have a de-facto language or at most two. People need to communicate and they're pretty good at figuring out how. In any locality there is a strong tendency to end up with the same language because of the need to communicate. Making it a law is at best redundant and at worst economically damaging if you take it to the extreme's Quebec has. The US doesn't have an official language because it doesn't need one. Neither does Canada really and I've spent enough of my life in Canada to know.

    The US is spending many billions of dollar trying to make every in every language.

    Nonsense. At most the US worries about English and sometimes Spanish. You might find other languages in places like airports where people might just be passing through but there is hardly any big effort to accommodate every language out there. You put signs in the most common language and if that eventually changes then you change the sign. Language should follow the people, not the other way around.

    1. Re:Languages tend to converge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Errr yeah? I just saw a Coker Coler comertial on my super bowl program that was in Chinerese and Muslim! I almost had to spit!

    2. Re:Languages tend to converge by tranquilidad · · Score: 1

      I'm not arguing whether it's a good or bad idea but California requires all health care documents be available in the following "threshold languages":

      Arabic, Armenian, Chinese, Farsi, Hmong, Khmer/Cambodian, Korean, Lao, Russian, Tagalog ad Vietnamese

      Furthermore, health care providers are required to provide translation assistance for their enrollees in the enrollee's "preferred spoken and written languages."

      Many of the healthcare regulations have spilled over into other governmental departments such as the DMV and voting.

    3. Re:Languages tend to converge by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      You often get people in the UK complaining about how many languages healthcare, tax etc forms and leaflets are in. "A waste of taxpayers' money" they cry, "it's discouraging them from learning the language." Well I've been on the other side, filling out tax forms in a foreign language, and believe me, it's hard. This isn't language you use very often -- it's specialised and often unclear even to native speakers. Dealing with health problems is even more difficult, and as a language teacher, I can't prepare my students for discussing every possible medical complication they might encounter. I had a degree in the language in question -- I struggle to imagine how difficult it would be to approach it after only evening classes at a community library....

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
  44. and? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And how many of them go on to be fluent with that otherwise useless language?

    1. Re:and? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      About as many French children studying English in French primary schools.

  45. Re: And in other news... by MadCow42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'd actually say that being a native English speaker is a DISADVANTAGE overall. You come to believe that the world must speak in your language, and never make any personal investment in learning the language (or culture) of another land. I am a native English speaker, and felt "disabled" when I live in Europe amongst people that routinely spoke 4-5 languages fluently (including English). Simply growing up with exposure to those languages is enough to help diversify their brain... and in my experience, their outlook on the world as well.

    The world is not nearly as US-centric or English-centric as most of us believe.

    --
    I used to have a sig, but I set it free and it never came back.
  46. Official Languages by laie_techie · · Score: 1

    Hawaii has two official languages (English and Hawaiian), but 80% of the population speaks "Pidgin" (Hawaiian Creole English) and fewer than 4% are fluent in Hawaiian. In Hawaii's case, "official language" means that all official publications are available in these two languages (people specify which one they want, so as to not make the manual twice as thick, for example). Nothing prevents people from speaking Tongan, Samoan, Japanese, or Pidgin in everyday life. Nothing says that only Hawaiian and English are acceptable for store signage. Nothing says that private entities (including stores) have to make everything available in these languages. Indeed, only limited Hawaiian is taught in our regular schools (by the fourth grade I could count to ten and say the primary and secondary colors). What Hawaiian I know is purely by luck that it was preserved in Pidgin.

  47. Re: And in other news... by wisnoskij · · Score: 1, Funny

    Quebec: demonstrating to the world why we need high yield nuclear weapons and carpet bombing since 1974.

    --
    Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
  48. My taxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But that's okay, no matter how economically self-destructive their policies are, they'll just take the shortfall from the rest of Canada.

  49. Re: And in other news... by kbdd · · Score: 4, Insightful
    As an immigrant who started learning English in school, I have no objection to anyone using the language of their choice for whatever private purpose they want to. However, I have an issue with the government (local, state or federal) spending taxpayer's money to make government services available in languages other than English. It seems to be common courtesy that if you want to move in and live in a country, you learn the local language as a courtesy to the locals you are invading as a mark of respect.

    Similarly, I am very offended when I call a bank or any other local business and the first thin I am asked is if I speak Spanish, to press '9'.

    Now, I also recognize that "speaking English" is not a strict definition. Many natives don't do that very well.

  50. Ici on parle everything by Fusione · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm a born and raised anglophone Quebecker. This is an issue I've faced (yes, faced) my whole life. There is a great deal of prejudice and discrimination against anglophones in Quebec, both socially and legislatively. Two applicants to the same job, both perfectly bilingual, one Francophone, one Anglophone, most times the Francophone gets the job. I've had people pick fights with me in bars, because I was speaking English with my friends privately. If you didn't attend English school as a child, you can't send your children to English school. I've gotten attitude from merchants for using the wrong conjugation or gender. The language issues touch every aspect of life here and truly divides Quebec. I've been against these discriminatory laws my whole life. In spite of all this, recently, after the last federal election, I'm starting to get it. Quebec is different than other provinces. The things we care about are different than the general population of North America. We believe in free health care and education for all. Not as a concept, but to the core of our being. It's ironic that we care so much for everyone, but lose sight of it over something as trivial as language. Francophone Quebec is afraid that we're going to lose these differences, this identity by way of dilution of the language. This is where the animosity comes from. It's rooted in fear, not in hatred. The fear of losing the language is justified and real. French is fading and being mixed against the cultural influence of English media. In 50 years, it will be the second language in Quebec. The fact is, today it's a French province with clear laws that signage and publicity must be in French first, and in English second. This said, the language police are overly aggressive and make silly moves like this pretty often.. and unfortunately it undermines Quebec and the social issues it faces. It makes us seem silly and petty to the rest of the world. If you live here, after things like this you have a harsh taste in your throat once you're done rolling your eyes. It is getting better. The next generation understands the world better than the previous generation, and things continue to improve.

    1. Re:Ici on parle everything by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

      We believe in free health care and education for all.

      I don't think "free" means what you think it means. You're probably looking for the word "socialized".

    2. Re:Ici on parle everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Universal health care is a Canadian value, and enshrined in Canadian law by the Medicare act of 1966. Quebec is simply a part of Canada and not an island unto itself in this regard.

      As an anglophone, while I live in Quebec and have for about 10 years, I would never contemplate working in Quebec nor hanging out a shingle for a business here. Even a task as simple as getting your driver's license renewed here is painful. Not a language thing, per say, just the dark shadow cast by a large, creaky, byzantine civil service. I don't think that the province has ever (or maybe will ever) recover from exodus in 1976. Lots of potential here, but also a lot of fear and navel gazing that holds people back. Fear of losing the Quebec culture, and general fear of 'the other'. I suppose it used to be fear of the Church, but since the quiet revolution this has been co-opted now by the secularists currently running the province. Most of the smart and ambitious leave (be they Francophone or Anglophone) - I know of a number that are respected leaders in Silicon Valley.

      Stuff like this is also a convenient political distraction and wedge issue.

      Instead of levelling with people and mobilizing to solve the real problems of Quebec, the current government prefers the peeps to focus on 'fear of the other'.

      If polls are to be believed, this tried and true strategy is working brilliantly and they will get a majority in the coming spring election.

    3. Re:Ici on parle everything by jwhitener · · Score: 1

      French is fading and being mixed against the cultural influence of English media. In 50 years, it will be the second language in Quebec.

      This is what gets me about almost any "conservative" worldview. It is obvious that the society and culture are going to change over time, why fight it? Like gay marriage in the US. It is obvious that over time people that are against gay marriage will be the minority. And with even more time, the gay marriage "fight" will be written in history books as a civil rights fight that the 'good guys' won (the people fighting for equality regardless of sexual preference).

      Language is even more fluid than social issues. All languages are constantly evolving. It seems to me that rather than fighting language change, Quebec would be better off identifying important cultural items, like traditional holidays, food, songs, etc.. and codifying those into law as the 'official X' of Quebec. Beyond that, there isn't much more you can do to preserve culture. Culture changes.

    4. Re:Ici on parle everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know if you noticed it, but you described bullying and discrimination against you in Quebec for speaking English.

      It's rooted in fear, not in hatred. -- In the words of Yoda, the fear HAS led to hatred.

    5. Re: Ici on parle everything by Fusione · · Score: 1

      Agreed, but I think the reason there's so much fear is because people feel that their language is such a part of their identity that if they lose it, they lose everything. This is why there are such strong reactions to it, while all other cultural influences arrive to open arms.

    6. Re: Ici on parle everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed, but I think the reason there's so much fear is because people feel that their language is such a part of their identity that if they lose it, they lose everything.

      This is why there are such strong reactions to it, while all other cultural influences arrive to open arms.

      Open arms?

      That's a bit of wishful thinking.

      With all due respect you clearly haven't been following the debate on the "secular charter". This is the same tried and true "fear of the other" wedge, designed to divide the Pure Laine (sp) from the rest of the flock. Polls suggest that most folks that support this bit of ridiculousness live in areas of Quebec that are mostly all-white and have few visible minority immigrants.

      The secularist, separatist government believe they can win a majority based on a combination of our ancient first-past-the-post balloting system and this fear-wedge issue. And by the polls they are probably right.

        It's time a bunch of folks here "Arrive en ville!", let go of their fears, rejoice in who they are and what they can accomplish and embrace their future with hope and optimism instead of clinging with fear to their past.

    7. Re:Ici on parle everything by weave · · Score: 1

      It is obvious that the society and culture are going to change over time, why fight it?

      I wonder how Americans would feel if/when Spanish becomes the dominant language. It's already happening in some parts of the country.

  51. Easy on the Canada hate slashdot. by kifter · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I'm really surprised to see such lacking arguments on this post. I have come to see slashdot as a place where reasoned argument rules and the sort of ambiguous attacks displayed in much of these comments are driven down.

    Here are some useful links. Canada is a bi-lingual country, and we embrace that fact: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/O... Quebec has laws in-place to protect its heritage which the citizens believe are necessary: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C...

    Sure these laws seem strange to outsiders, but there is a large segment of the Quebec population that take seriously that their land continue to reflect their culture. And to the people that use business as the ultimate barometer of a laws efficacy, remember that there are some people who hold other things higher than cash and they have every right to do so. I'm sure the Quebec people understand the negative effect that these laws have on their economy, but can balance the sting by appreciating the positive effect they have on their lands and people.
    Personally I would like to live there and experience these Canadian peoples way of life.
    Bonjour!

    1. Re:Easy on the Canada hate slashdot. by BradMajors · · Score: 1

      But, why doesn't the rest of the country have laws to preserve their white, protestant, english speaking heritage? Don't Canadians appreciate the positive effect to "their lands and people" from keeping it white?

    2. Re:Easy on the Canada hate slashdot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This has nothing to do with religion or race you xenophobic moron.

    3. Re:Easy on the Canada hate slashdot. by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

      This has nothing to do with religion or race you xenophobic moron.

      Bullshit, the Quebec cultural issues are xenophobia writ large, it's a manufactured us vs. them.

      It's the same bloody game the nazis played in the 1930s.

      If you're not with them, you're against them. You must be anti-french, etc. etc.

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    4. Re:Easy on the Canada hate slashdot. by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      I don't think anyone has a problem with Canadian bilingualism in general. It's only Quebec language laws and their policing that raises some brows.

      And the reason why it does is that, under the guise of "preserving a culture", they're actively persecuting another culture. In any other circumstance, we would call it xenophobic and extreme nationalist to tell people that they cannot speak their own language, or must do so only in certain proscribed way. Why should we make a difference for Quebec?

      To reiterate, the problem isn't that Quebec requires French signage etc from businesses and such. The problem is that they limit the use of other languages.

    5. Re:Easy on the Canada hate slashdot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm really surprised to see such lacking arguments on this post.

      That's really awful English. Perhaps you are from Quebec?

    6. Re:Easy on the Canada hate slashdot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quebec has laws in-place to protect its heritage which the citizens believe are necessary

      Let's add that to the list of excuses that justify any government policy, no matter how irrational:

      1. "It's for the children"
      2. "We need this to fight terrorists"
      3. "We're protecting our culture"

  52. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  53. Je me souviens by ficuscr · · Score: 2

    My thoughts exactly. Uninformative crap post. Suppose this is "shocking" news if you are not familiar with Quebec's history and language / culture laws. Really just seems like enforcement of existing laws,

    1. Re:Je me souviens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Je me souviens". When my kids saw that on license plates, I spent a considerable amount of time convincing them it translated to "Buy Our Souvenirs".

    2. Re:Je me souviens by almitydave · · Score: 1

      Ha!

      My wife and I spent a week in Quebec last summer, and I looked everywhere for a souvenir shot glass that said "Je ne me souviens pas" ("I don't remember") but I never found one.

      --
      my, your, his/her/its, our, your, their
      I'm, you're, he's/she's/it's, we're, you're, they're
  54. Re:My Thank You Note by OurDailyFred · · Score: 1

    Actually Mr. Iron, it would be roughly 55 percent extra space, as translations of English into French are approximately 10 percent longer because of the way the language works. Those publishing bilingual materials often lower the font size of the French by a point, so the two languages can share the same layout and graphics.

    But if all other things were equal, it would be about 55 percent larger.

    I do hope that helps. But it probably won't.

    F.

    --
    If your only tool is a hammer, you'll approach every problem as if it were a nail. - Abraham Maslow
  55. Re: And in other news... by iCEBaLM · · Score: 4, Insightful

    shut the fuck up asshole. we all know english people won't make any efforts to learn french even if the live in france directly.

    I am Canadian, I live in Ontario, I am an anglophone, and I went to french immersion school for 4 years, with about 90 other students in my class, and studied with Rosetta Stone for two, but I live in an almost exclusively english area.

    I can read french pretty well, but I can't really speak it well due to lack of practice. So anyways, english people do make efforts to learn french. It's usually the French people who put us off of it with attitudes like yours.

  56. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  57. What jurisdiction does the Quebec Language Squad.. by rnturn · · Score: 1

    have over the content of a web page not hosted on a Canadian server?

    ``She received a letter from the language office telling her to translate everything posted on her store's Facebook page into French.''

    Or else what? Are they going to revoke her business license?

    --
    CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
  58. Re: And in other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The world is not nearly as US-centric or English-centric as most of us believe.

    True enough, but sure as fuck even less of it is French-centric.

  59. Re: And in other news... by AvitarX · · Score: 1

    I agree that learning new languages is great (especially for people that have a talent for it), but I think that language nationalism is bad (including in the US, where it really seems to be picking up). The amount of people that say things like "my family learned English when they came" but are obviously just ignorant (or have English ancestors) is upsetting to me. Having slight isolation between cultures is a good thing I think (and I don't mean strong, simply areas where ideas are developed in close proximity but differently), as it allows for exchange between divergent groups and when things reconnect (as the inevitably do) the whole is better than if everything was just one homogeneous culture.

    I've found a lot less English speakers in Europe than people seem to claim, especially as far as "everybody speaks English". The people that spoke English seemed to be tourist facing types, and those that went to University, second languages tended to be the closest bordering country in Europe for the most people.

    Trying to use broken Spanish to talk to people that had broken Italian as a second language is fun.

    --
    Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
  60. Quebecois.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How very classy of you. Typical response of someone with a crappy hockey team and garbage beer. Just admit you're America lite and move on Sally.

    1. Re:Quebecois.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh s'il-vous plait, ce n'est pas sur slashdot qu'on me fera une leçon de classe. Vous tombez très mal, car j'ai horreur du hockey et autres sports de demeurés, et préfère de loin le vin à la bière. D'ailleurs personne de civilisé ne va apprécier ces pisses de chameaux que produisent toutes les grandes marques nord-américaines n'est-ce pas ?

  61. I have an idea by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    Time to run all the acronyms, idioms, and misspellings through Google Translate. That will make the language police happy I'm sure.

    By the way, WE NEED THIS LAW in the southern US!

    1. Re:I have an idea by Krishnoid · · Score: 1

      And to be safe and scrub out all the inconsistencies, run it back and forth through the English <-> Francais translation a few times. Even better, run it through a few different languages. That should improve the quality significantly.

  62. Re: And in other news... by Anarchy24 · · Score: 2

    I'm a first-generation Quebecois in America (ugh!) and my French = NULL. I studied it some on my own as a kid and took it for 5 years in school. I also studied Latin for 2 years, and German and Chinese for 1. I tried, I really did.
    I can't speak a single damn one of them and can barely read a tourist map.
    I studied linguistics for 2 years and was very good at it, but it simply feels impossible to learn another language. The amount of rote memorization, unusual grammar, and idioms makes the task seem insurmountable; I'm done trying. I guess I'm just lazy.

    A joke they told in my language classes was that a person who spoke three languages was trilingual, a person who spoke two was bilingual, and a person who spoke one was an American. Without having exposure to many different languages at an early age - not just exposure but living amongst them - Americans are pretty much doomed when it comes to learning a second language. Before the age of 4 children can acquire just about any language with ease, and this decreases until the age of 11 or 12 or so - after that, its really really hard to learn another.

    It sucks living in New York City and feeling like I'm the only person who doesn't speak another language, but that's just life. At least I speak only English and not only French.

  63. Re: And in other news... by Nyder · · Score: 0

    To extend this, I've known plenty of people who have lived in Asian countries (for at least a few years) but never really picked up the language. It's one of the advantages of being a native English speaker... you can go almost anywhere on Earth and find people that know enough English for you to live day-to-day life. The only things you really need to pick up are words and phrases with no direct translation.

    On the other hand, I've met many many foreign types in America who don't bother to learn English, even though they live here now.

    --
    Be seeing you...
  64. Just another of many examples of the by Grey+Geezer · · Score: 0

    French inferiority complex. Well earned though they may be, surrendering to them is a sign of French weakness. Here's an idea French speakers...why not just put on your big boy pants and do something that would actually give people the urge to use the French language voluntarily. Viva la Lafayette!

    --
    The USA is only 4X older than me...perspective
  65. Re: And in other news... by AvitarX · · Score: 1

    If the bank does it, I would assume it's just good business (or they wouldn't do it).

    Are you really offended by that? As for government I agree with you in general (though sometimes pragmatism should win out, I don't think government should be inefficient to enforce the 'rightness').

    The youngins always learn the local language in schools, it's the older generations that traditionally would move into an ethnic neighborhood, and not learn the local language (unless you count the local language as the one of said ethnicity).

    If the local Mexican grocer was required to learn and do business in English, my neighborhood would be diminished while he learned to do such, similar for both the east-asian and south-asian grocers. I'm glad that these people are allowed to open up businesses, rather than apparently being forced to close down as they are in Quebec.

    --
    Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
  66. Re:I live in Québec and those law are pretty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like how you describe Best Buy as a local store. That's kind of cute.

  67. She should have asked them by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

    to please send the letter in French

    --
    I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
  68. Re:I live in Québec and those law are pretty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sorry -- can you translate your slashdot comments into French, and post them above the English? Then we can help you.

  69. Well, there is a context to understand ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Quebec wants to keep its culture distinct ( not the absolute majority (cf. referendums on independance), but a sizeable portion of the Quebecers (cf. the Sovereignists run the provice today).
    Surrounded in a English-speaking continent, Quebec is taking affirmative actions so ensure that...
    Quebec companies have to use French, which is not the same as being barred from using English ...
    Ostie de calisse en tabernak', americans are laughing at us, quebecers, because they are jealous : we can go to Cuba on cheap and sunny vacations (well, actually considering our winter ... do not take this as a political endorsement of the stalinists there )

  70. Regulation of commercial speech by tepples · · Score: 1

    From the article, "Eva Cooper owns Delilah in the Parc". She also owns Delilah Glebe, which is in Ontario. Thus, in effect, she does own / rent / lease / has bought land on the other side of the border.

    Exactly. If Cooper cannot obey the laws needed to run Delilah in the Parc, she always has the option of sticking to Delilah Glebe.

    The concept is to what jurisdiction does one's FB feed belong to?

    As I understand it, it belongs to the joint jurisdiction of the jurisdiction in which Facebook is headquartered, the jurisdiction in which the server exists, and the jurisdiction from which the business that maintains the page operates.

    And does *any* governing body have veto powers when it comes down to what it is that you have to say?

    Governments have seen fit to regulate commercial speech by business located within their borders more strictly than political speech.

  71. Bill 101 by everett1911 · · Score: 2

    Actually it's Bill 101 that is the cause of all this. Basically, Bill 101: french must be everywhere and people who don't speak french aren't people. (disclaimer: I'm french canadian, it's my native language. and I had to learn english on my own starting 16 years ago.)

  72. Chers slashdotters... by nierdal · · Score: 0

    If there's a subject on which I can't agree with my fellow slashdotters, it's anything that touch the language laws in Quebec.

    Yes I'm a french canadian, yes I'm partial on the subject. But please, try to understand. To us, language protection is as important as the right to bear arms in the US.

    With 330 millions english speakers around us, french would rapidly become extinct without laws to protect it. And to us, language IS our culture. Therefor we have democratically passed laws to ensure that our culture will still exist in the future.

    There is no language police in Quebec. It's barely a small branch of a ministry that can give you a slap on the wrist. Best Buy is still called "Best Buy" and you can still buy your kids clothes at the "Children"s place". But at least it try to preserve our culture.

    And I'm saying that and on the other hand I want my kids to learn english from preschool at the same time than french. We are not in the 70s anymore.

    1. Re:Chers slashdotters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well it certainly sucks to be on the ass-end of your selfish law. We anglophones don't need such laws anywhere - in the world.

    2. Re:Chers slashdotters... by Shados · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Its important to a small zealot minority. I'm also french Canadian and have lived there most of my life. There's a couple of people who are impossibly vocal about it. The rest don't care or even dread it. They do a heck of a lot more than give slaps on the wrists, with daily fines and penalties, forcing companies to have "councils" that oversee usage of the language, etc.

      The only reason stuff like Best Buy is still Best Buy, is because you can negotiate. I worked for a very large international company that opened an office in Montreal. They couldn't realistically comply with all the laws, so they were making deals: one of the deal was to have everyone, including english-only speakers, have only access to french computers/operating systems/keyboards and not be allowed to change them.

      Yeah, that was a pain.

      I worked for another that was almost exclusively english speakers. We were still forced to translate all our reports in french, including the one offs that were only read by a single specific executive who didn't even know french.

      In the end, it hurts competitiveness on a global level. There's a reason salaries are so much lower in Montreal than in other large Canadian cities. The cost of doing business is just insane. So I left.

    3. Re:Chers slashdotters... by nierdal · · Score: 1

      While I agree on certains points, nobody ever got to jail because of the french protections laws.

      And competitiveness in Quebec is a matter of productivity (too powerfull unions) and not language. Even if everybody in QC speaked english we would still be as unproductive as we are.

    4. Re:Chers slashdotters... by Shados · · Score: 1

      Nobody goes to jail but a LOT of fines get paid. And I personally never worked at a company with a union, and the issues were ever present. A lot of companies will avoid the area altogether over this.

      The only reason you have booms (like in the gaming industry) is because of the massive tax breaks. And even with all that, companies are always a hair from running away... its a total joke.

    5. Re:Chers slashdotters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My wife is Chinese and we live in Ontario.

      With 330 million speaking english around her "Ontario Mandarin" would become extinct without laws to protect it. And to the Chinese language is their culture. Therefore, using non-democratic laws she demands no less then the full conversion of Canada to Mandarin. Does that work for you?

      "There is no language police in Quebec"
      You are kidding right? They give fines, the enforce laws yet are not "police"?

      Here is a thought, if it truly was important it would carry on in the same way my wife teaches mandarin to our kids.

    6. Re:Chers slashdotters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only reason stuff like Best Buy is still Best Buy, is because you can negotiate.

      Wrong. That is because "Best Buy" is the company name, and trademarked.

      If a company is not allowed to use their trademarked name in business in Quebec because it is english, then the trademark has no value. This also violates some international treaties on the protection of trademarks.

      Quebec currently has a ongoing court case trying to force these companies to not use their trademarks and use something else instead.

      IANAL, but I believe that Quebec will lose the case.

    7. Re:Chers slashdotters... by purpledinoz · · Score: 1

      I wonder if the language police got a whiff of programming languages being in English only. I would love to see them legislate a french programming language.

  73. How is this even relevant to /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really, I have to idea why would this be of any importance to us on Slashdot.

    1. Re:How is this even relevant to /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FACEBOOK!!!

      But yeah, it's not relevant at all.

  74. In French... by Cruciform · · Score: 1

    Fuck le police.

  75. Re:What jurisdiction does the Quebec Language Squa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The jurisdiction is over the store, which is why Facebook probably wouldn't be sued, and sure, they could revoke her business license, or fine her, the same if she didn't comply with laws requiring various notices or whatever posted in her store.

  76. Shouldn't it be Spanish??? by bigwavedave33 · · Score: 1

    sorry couldn't resist...

  77. long arm of the law... by swell · · Score: 1

    Quebec's irrational ide'e fixe reaches to Southern California and Mexico as well.

    Many products in local stores have packaging printed in two languages- French & English. In my American city we have roughly 10,000 Spanish speakers for every French speaker. In Tijuana the imbalance is more extreme.

    The language police have a long reach.

    --
    ...omphaloskepsis often...
    1. Re:long arm of the law... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is not a Québec law but a Canadian law. All products sold in Canada must be labeled both in French and English. You have multiple language products because of the Free Trade. Products sold in US, Mexico and Canada are labeled in 3 languages (cheaper labeling than having different ones). Products only sold in Mexico and US are labelled in Spanish and English. Products sold in Canada and US only are labeled in French and English.

      The Canadian law was passed to make peace with the French speaking population so they do not secede from Canada.

      If we ever have free trade with Brazil you are likely to see labeling in Portuguese so get used to it.

    2. Re:long arm of the law... by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      I used to live in Spain, right next to the French border. Lots of the products on the supermarket shelves were labelled in Spanish and Portuguese. Because it's easier for them to print one set of packaging and distribute it everywhere than produce different packs. Many of the products available in the UK have at least one language, quite often things like Dutch or Danish, which are relatively close by and have a small consumer base. Galaxy chocolates often have Arabic on them. There is even a couple of supermarket chains whose own brand products carry half the languages of the EU.

      The rest of the world is used to this... calm down, North America.

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    3. Re:long arm of the law... by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      Exactly, the toothpaste you buy in Buenos Aires has 'weird' Portuguese words on the label.

  78. you are wrong by Roosdeuk33li195 · · Score: 1

    Quebec does not want to be a part of France... Not at all and far from it... the "damn cousins" is how they call French... and the current influx on French people leaving the Eurozone troubles is not well regarded...

    1. Re:you are wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quebec does not want to be a part of France... Not at all and far from it...
      the "damn cousins" is how they call French... and the current influx on French people leaving the Eurozone troubles is not well regarded...

      Quebec wants only one thing, to be independent. Even the language they speak is very different from the modern french that is spoken in france. Ironically it's somewhat a pure version of french. A little bit like the difference between spanish and castillan.

    2. Re:you are wrong by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

      But they absolutely refuse to allow any regions of Quebec the same courtesy.

      Not all of Quebec wants to go. If Quebec left at least 25% of Quebec would leave Quebec and join a neighboring Canadian province. Also Quebec would be in a huge mess without the rest of Canada paying it's bills.

      Pure version of frogish? Not what the French have told me. More like Mexican is to Spanish.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    3. Re:you are wrong by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      There's no such thing as a "pure" version of French. Modern French, though primarily derived from Parision, is a mélange of features from different areas of France. Where words start ép-, éc- etc, that's a corruption of Latin sp-, sc-, and while the Celtic and Germanic tribes could say that, the Basques (in the South, a long way from Paris) couldn't; "c'est à moi" is thought to be a Celtic pattern; the name "France" comes from the Germanic people "the Franks" who originally lived in most of Northern France. And all of this was just "impure Latin".

      The difference between Québuécois is simply that Québuécois is derived from a different mixture of regional dialects, as there were very few Parisians among the original settlers. Neither is more "pure", neither is more "cultured", neither is more "intelligent". At the end of the day, both are just "how people speak".

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
  79. Re: And in other news... by kbdd · · Score: 2
    I tend to agree with you, but it is to a large extent a chicken and egg thing.

    If people are not somehow gently pushed to learn English by speaking it, they have little incentive to do so, and you have these enclaves of foreign-speaking residents who develop a society of their own separate from the rest of the country. Overall, society pays the cost of having to support business (private and government) in more than one language. It does not provide value, except to facilitate tourism and immigration, which I agree may actually be valuable in other regards.

    If people were obligated to at least do formal interface with the government in English, they would be more likely to conduct other business in English too, and we would all benefit (me, who does not speak Spanish, could do business with that fraction of the country which currently only does business in Spanish for instance.)

    What offends me the most about the calls to the bank is that Spanish is the primary language you hear. I am not offended that they are actually able (and find it profitable) to conduct business in Spanish, it is that Spanish is the first language you hear when you call.

    If people are invested enough in this country that they have to have a local bank account, they should be able to understand at least enough English to know that pressing 9 during the first few seconds will get them a Spanish menu without having to be told, in Spanish.

  80. just out of curiousity . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...did anyone catch the reference to "Montreal French" in The Monuments Men.

  81. Phrog Nonsense by warren.oates · · Score: 1

    We run a B&B in Ontario; we speak pretty good Frog, and we have a web-page in Phrog for the Phrog tourists. So I'm gonna take it down (the Phrog version) and return some error code to the bastards. 406 (not acceptable) is a good one, but also 402 (payment required) might come in handy.

    --
    Doh.
    1. Re:Phrog Nonsense by Krishnoid · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, I couldn't find 'phrog' in urbandictionary. Could you add a proper entry for those of us not in the know?

  82. secession by Msdose · · Score: 0

    With climate change, the U.S. is becoming a desert. They need an influx of water in vast quantities. To facilitate this, the CIA has infiltrated the Quebec government to lead Quebec to independence. Canada will then be free to sell the St. Lawrence river to the U.S. for trillions of dollars. Quebec will get french stop signs. Follow the money.

    1. Re:secession by Punko · · Score: 1

      Thank goodness the St. Lawrence isn't a provincial resource, its a Federal one.

      Check that. Our current current Prime Minister is far more likely to sell the river to the US for a few beads then Quebec would.

      --
      If only we could fall into a woman's arms without falling into her hands
    2. Re:secession by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canada will then be free to sell the St. Lawrence river to the U.S. for trillions of dollars.

      Idiot. The US can drain the great lake from their end. Doing such will cause war on their homeland that they cannot win. eg: there is a difference between bombing childrens with drone oversea and fighting guerilla war in your own cities.

  83. Re:I live in Québec and those law are pretty by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 0

    To whoever modded the parent: You keep using the word "Troll". I do not think it means what you think it means.

  84. Re: And in other news... by AvitarX · · Score: 1

    If you force cultural blending too quickly you limit the foreign culture influence on society, which i think is a benefit (perhaps I am wrong, but I think that there is not just a correlation, but also a causation to the fact that the best, and especially best lower price, ethnic food is in areas where English speakers can be hard to find).

    At least locally (to me), the cultural push of being surrounded by English speakers appears to be working too, as it's been well over a decade since I've needed to order by number in a restaurant (even if they're still on the menu), and probably close to 5 years since a server didn't have native quality of English at a Mexican restaurant (though the Asian ones it is sometimes clear English is a second language). I personally believe that a slow cultural integration benefits everyone, which is not to say I support some more extreme measures such as enforced bilingualism.

    --
    Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
  85. Re: And in other news... by J+Story · · Score: 1

    Meanwhile, in other parts of Canada, people come here and talk Tagalog (Philippines), Chinese, Korean, Hindi, Farsi, German, Ukranian, Polish, Spanish, Cree, Blackfoot, even English. We try to accommodate people and welcome new people. I personally love Thai, Vietnamese and Mexican food. If a Chinese restaurant wants a big sign in Chinese, I welcome the big Chinese sign. Poor Quebec: Insular, Inbred. Under the impish belief that their culture is superior to all others, they are stupid enough to try and enforce it by law. Others are cosmopolitan. They are insular, unrefined, parochial. Perhaps they don't even realise how stupid they look to the rest of the world.

    And to throw Canadian politics into this discussion, Justin Trudeau, leader of the Liberal Party and potentially the next Prime Minister of Canada, holds up Quebec values as a beacon to the rest of Canada. Something tells me this will not end well.

  86. Re: And in other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because they are a bunch of cheese eating surrender monkeys.

  87. Re: And in other news... by Ken+D · · Score: 1

    They only pretend not to know English when you ask them: "You speaka da English?!"

  88. Re: And in other news... by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

    To see how long that disadvantage lasts look at the frogs, who still dream of the day when the language of education and science was frogish. Even though it's been 200 years.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  89. Re: And in other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hahahahahahahahahaha. That's some funny shit.

  90. Re: And in other news... by FuzzNugget · · Score: 1

    Try convincing *them* of that.

    Quebec enjoys the rather awkward position of being legally recognized as a "distinct nation", yet is still a province of Canada. Their legal system also operates differently than the rest of Canada's.

    I was in PQ briefly once. I could *feel* the condescension. The only interaction I had was with a park staff informing me that I wasn't allowed to have my dog there in the wide open field (not that there were any signs indicating such, in French or otherwise).

    The easiest way to explain Quebec to Americans is: "they're French" ;)

  91. Re: And in other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have traveled to China a fair bit and question your statement. My experience was my inability to speak Mandarin was a major hurdle. Most of the people i encountered were unable to recognize even the simplest of english words.

  92. Re: And in other news... by asylumx · · Score: 1

    shut the fuck up asshole. we all know english people won't make any efforts to learn french even if the live in france directly. I would be very surprised if a fucken english asshole like you would learn Chinese while living in china. you think you have the right to live in a foreign language in a french country, great. you are the ass hole.

    Pardon your french?

  93. Re: And in other news... by jandrese · · Score: 1

    It got close a few years ago. They had a vote to secede, but it didn't pass.

    The French speakers in Canada have been paranoid about their language for a long time now. I remember back in the 90s when I lived in Alberta this was a big issue. They see themselves as a small island of culture literally surrounded by English speakers (or frozen arctic wastes) and if they don't jealously guard their language they'll lose it. They're probably right too, because maintaining two languages on everything is a hassle and many people would naturally stop bothering with the French stuff if they were given the option.

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
  94. Keystone by rossdee · · Score: 1

    The Canadians can keep their power and use it to refine their own stinking tar sand oil.

  95. Re:I live in Québec and those law are pretty by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Bravo moderator. Don't let the troll's bitching deter you.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  96. Re: And in other news... by jandrese · · Score: 2

    It's an American problem. If you speak any language but English, then you have an easy pick for second language. If English is your first language then you have to take a gamble. Do you go for Spanish so you can talk with Mexicans? Or maybe French so you can talk with some Canadians? Or maybe something more exotic that you'll probably never use? Maybe Chinese so you'll be prepared for the eventual world takeover, just like all of those people who studied Japanese back in the 80s. Or you could study Japanese because you love anime but hate reading subtitles. Learning a language takes so long that by the time you're good at it, who knows what your life situation will be like.

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
  97. Re: And in other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trudeau wants to make the whole country like Quebec. Who the country will leech money from to pay for all the government spending is an open question.

  98. Re: And in other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't forget that over 150 years ago, a big portion of the US territory was under Spanish and then Mexican rule (and other languages were spoken before that). English is only the most recent language to be spoken until some different language takes its turn.

    Keep in mind that there is no official language in the US (http://answers.usa.gov/system/templates/selfservice/USAGov/#!portal/1012/article/3206/Official-Language-of-the-US). It happens that English is the most common followed by spanish. ~40 million people are spanish speakers in the US, that is way more people than the population of many countries. Businesses and governments cannot simply ignore that.

  99. Dumb English speaker here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Genie comprendy pass? What the fuck does that mean?

  100. Vancouver example... by Morpeth · · Score: 1

    ...as to why this kind of crap is bullsh*t.

    For those who don't know, the most common second language(s) in British Columbia are the major Chinese dialects. Some people refer to Vancouver as Hongcouver because of the influx of Chinese after the Hong Kong changeover to western Canada. They've brought a lot of money and business with them.

    Anyway... everything has to be bilingual (French and English) in even Vancouver where very, very people speak French, and there's nothing requiring signs in Chinese. It costs a fortune for every business in Canada to have to do this, BUT yet when you go to Quebec, it's perfectly ok for signs (even #@$! road signs) to be ONLY in French,

    THIS is why so many English speaking Canadians get so pissed at the Quebecois

    --

    'The unexamined life is not worth living' - Socrates
    1. Re:Vancouver example... by HungWeiLo · · Score: 1

      Actually, isn't it cheaper do go bilingual anyways? With French/English and Spanish added to a product's packaging and manual, you are essentially able to sell your product to consumers in all of the Americas, Africa and much of Europe without much little or no repackaging of your product.

      Recently, a thousand signatures were gathered to require English signs in Richmond (though it failed to pass in city council), so it shows that BC people are not immune to fears of language hegemony when it is perceived to threaten their own identity.

      http://www.vancouverobserver.c...

      --
      There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
    2. Re:Vancouver example... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Requiring signage in English is not unreasonable. I did live in Richmond for a while, and the fact that there are so many stores which you can't meaningfully shop in because all the signs and labels are in Chinese was annoying.

      OTOH, if the proposal that you're talking about mandates the use of English only, and forbids the use of Chinese, or if they are trying to add some silly size/prominence restrictions (Chinese text must not be visually bigger than English text), then it is definitely a bad one, for the same reason why Quebec language laws are bad.

  101. Vive le Quebec libre ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Vive le Quebec libre !

  102. Re: And in other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Countries need to interact with other countries. Governments need to communicate to facilitate trade. The more knowledgeable and educated the government employees the more prosperity for the country, state or city. There is nothing negative or costly in dealing with other languages when there is a need. It creates trade and promotes growth. I speak 3 languages and can communicate in at least 3 more it was never a hindrance it always opened opportunity and brought me prosperity.

    Common courtesy of a guest is to speak the hosts language. Common courtesy of a host is to speak the guests language. Courtesy is like a dance it needs to be practiced by both parties to do/be any good.

  103. Re: And in other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Me too, and I live there. Just update me on facebook before you drop the bombs, ok?

  104. Business decision to start or not start a PAC by tepples · · Score: 1

    If you are one of a very few people in a jurisdiction who disagree with a law, it's almost as hard to change as gravity. You have to make a business decision on whether to comply, leave the jurisdiction, or start a PAC to get the law changed.

    1. Re:Business decision to start or not start a PAC by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

      Yeah, at some point it becomes an unsolvable tyranny of the majority, but you can always try just getting your story out.

    2. Re:Business decision to start or not start a PAC by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      You know, I once tried importing my fine German sausages into the US, but the b*st*rds said I had to translate the ingredients into English. Das ist nicht gut! Tyranny of the majority! Interfering with the free market!

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    3. Re:Business decision to start or not start a PAC by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      There is a big difference between the list of ingredients (which contains e.g. important nutritional and food safety info), and a sign on your establishment or its Facebook page.

      For that matter, when importing your sausages, all you need is to have the list of ingredients in English there somewhere. They don't require you to completely remove German, or make it no less than X% smaller visually than English.

    4. Re:Business decision to start or not start a PAC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't require you to completely remove German, or make it no less than X% smaller visually than English.

      And Quebec's law does not require them to remove all other language either. Only that French must be available first. eg: not a half-backed translation in tiny character hidden downstairs in a closet that has a "beware of tier" sign on the door. tl;dr - Fuck you.

    5. Re:Business decision to start or not start a PAC by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      It's really funny how so many people can be so butthurt over something as trivial as a person speaking or writing in another language. Sad, but funny.

      But if that's what Quebec wishes to be known for internationally...

  105. What is the French URL for www.facebook.com? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since everything must 1st be in French, then isn't Facebook the one in violation?

  106. Re: And in other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, you see, English USED to be the first language that you'd hear on these phone systems, asking you to press 1 for English, and then asking you to press 2 in Spanish for Spanish. Then some self-righteous idiots decided to throw a big stinking fuss about how if you're going to live in America you better speak American how dare I have to press 1 for English.

    Banks, of course, don't have the luxury of just ignoring the vastly growing population of Spanish speaking customers. They have a vested financial interest in making sure these customers have access to customer support in their native tongue. So now, instead of just pressing 1 for English and being done with it, you have made yourself and all the rest of us sit through 9 seconds of Spanish before we can move forward with the phone call. Thanks a lot, by the way, because I really would like that time back.

  107. Re:And in other news... by substance2003 · · Score: 1

    As a resident of Quebec. I take offence to what you say. I don't call you an asshole if you're government is doing stupid things (which I'll bet they do) so leave the general folks in Quebec alone and keep you're complaints focused on the provincial government of Quebec or the federal government of Canada for letting the provincial one get away with it.

  108. Re: Best Buy as a local store by JcMorin · · Score: 2

    I assume you are an american so I've use one company that you know but name sell electronics. For your information Best buy DO have local store near me that employ local people. Americans don't travel the border state everyday to do work in all Best Buy in Canada :) I could have name a small company that you have no clue what it is... what's the difference?

  109. Re: And in other news... by kbdd · · Score: 1
    Well, of course I agree with you, and not just because I am of foreign origin. I do appreciate the value of cultural blending as I am participating in it myself, voluntarily or not :) And as I pointed out earlier, there is much value in it, not only in tourism but also in quality of life for those who choose to see it that way (bigots need not apply).

    It still pisses me off when I call the bank though !

    I also believe that in the long run, these groups have to integrate somewhat into their host country, and that means losing at least some of their culture while assimilating the local culture, otherwise what would it mean to live in a particular country? Individual countries would have little identification for themselves.

    Maybe that is just the way it is going. I reserve the right to decide later if it is good or bad :)

  110. Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms by Gravitron+5000 · · Score: 1

    Bill 22 should be against section 2b. I have no idea why it has not been struck down. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

    1. Re:Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms by Gravitron+5000 · · Score: 1

      I knew something was odd. The bill is 101, not 22.

    2. Re:Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

      It has not legally been bill 101 since it was passed over 30 years ago.

      There is no such thing as bill 101, we just like to continue calling it that.

      (For our American cousins following along at home, most of this legislation was actually deemed unconstitutional about 25 years ago, but remains standing due to an enormous loophole in the Constitution that was intended to be used for emergency powers but has been interpreted to mean whatever they want it to mean.)

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    3. Re:Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Recall that Quebec didn't sign the Charter.

    4. Re:Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe that you may be referring to famous 'notwithstanding' clause.

      I don't think that it was ever tested in court, if I recall correctly due to fear of legal precedent being set, but I'm sure there's a nuance I'm missing.

  111. Re: And in other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    There's a grave difference language wise between immigration and bilingualism.

  112. Oh well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's still better than the Grammar Police.

  113. Once Quebec loses tax dollars by tepples · · Score: 1

    If Quebec border towns start losing provincial tax revenue to towns on the other side of the border, then perhaps Quebec will notice how harmful the law is.

    1. Re:Once Quebec loses tax dollars by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

      In libertarian fantasy land, where changes in revenue are immediately understood and accurately acted on, sure.

  114. Re: And in other news... by afxgrin · · Score: 1

    Funny how the Chinese immigrants in Quebec prefer to learn English over French - supposedly the reason PQ supporters want provincial level immigration controls. Don't make this into an Anglophone's not wanting to learn another language thing - it clearly extends beyond English speakers. Tabernac!

  115. There is a difference. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those who live in Texas are forced to due to their arrogance. It's the only state in the nation that is large enough to fit their oversized heads.

  116. Just Give It Your Seal Of Approval by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Phoque off.

  117. F Quebec, North Mexico by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nt

  118. Re: And in other news... by Zaatxe · · Score: 1

    A shit-ton of French students[...]

    A metric ton or an imperial ton?

    --
    So say we all
  119. Re:What jurisdiction does the Quebec Language Squa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes.

  120. Re: And in other news... by metrix007 · · Score: 1

    I lived in Quebec for a year. Québécois are assholes.

    They petitioned the rest of English speaking Canada to be bilingual, meaning all signage is in both languages, but they don't reciprocate.

    Go into any store and there is no english signage. Whats more they are anal enough to sue stores because an apostrophe is in the wrong place, and force KFC to rename themselves to PFK (french for kentucky fried chicken). Even the french don't do that.

    I think it says it all when people give you dirty looks if you speak english, and that they get insulted by the term peppers. Québécois drink a lot of pepsi stereotypically, and are offended by this being pointed out.

    I was glad to get out.

    --
    If you ignore ACs because they are anonymous - you're an idiot.
  121. Re:I live in Québec and those law are pretty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Smart-ass, multiply this by hundreds to thousands of sales small and large and see if it doesn't add up.

  122. Re: And in other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    However, I have an issue with the government (local, state or federal) spending taxpayer's money to make government services available in languages other than English.

    French, and English are both official languages in Canada. Français, et l'anglais sont les deux langes officielles du Canada

  123. I would pack up my business by ralphaostrander · · Score: 1

    And move.

  124. I think i speak for all of Canada when i say by maliqua · · Score: 1

    Quebec please fuck off, next Referendum vote yes we don't want you and you don't like us

    1. Re:I think i speak for all of Canada when i say by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

      Quebec please fuck off, next Referendum vote yes we don't want you and you don't like us

      We're all a little fed up, but no, you don't speak for all of Canada, you're just a very vocal minority of rednecks.

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    2. Re:I think i speak for all of Canada when i say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think it would be a minority to forcibly separate those who enforce human rights abuse laws like this. I think Canada would rather they leave, preferably off the seaboard.

      The Quebecers who are normal, I think we all like to keep.

    3. Re:I think i speak for all of Canada when i say by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      One thing that I genuinely don't get: why does the rest of Canada want to keep Quebec? What's in it for you?

    4. Re:I think i speak for all of Canada when i say by T-Bucket · · Score: 1

      One thing that I genuinely don't get: why does the rest of Canada want to keep Quebec? What's in it for you?

      Hydroelectric power, mostly.

  125. Spelling mistake... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It`s actually: Je ne comprends pas.

  126. Re:What jurisdiction does the Quebec Language Squa by thebigmacd · · Score: 1

    Fines and revocation of business license.

  127. Re:And in other news... by Guy+Smiley · · Score: 1

    Except that the government of Quebec is elected by the Quebecois. If there weren't enough voters to elect the BQ or PQ with their anti-English policies then things might change. It's not (quite) like North Korea where the average person has no say in who is in charge.

  128. Re:I live in Québec and those law are pretty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't be a dick, his point is that the law is causing a loss of sales that could have otherwise been made. It's completely valid and relevant.

  129. Re:I live in Québec and those law are pretty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's weird I know you're joking but the poster had a point. He's complaining about the absurdity of the law prevents stores from stocking products because the labels or manuals not available in french language. He had to purchase off-province, I wonder how much business is lost to local market because of this.

  130. "Fermé" is French for "closed" by tepples · · Score: 1

    And when full compliance is cost-prohibitive, nothing gets your story out like a fermé sign on the front door.

  131. FTFY by jklovanc · · Score: 1

    being legally recognized as a "distinct society"

    Sovereignty had been a thorny issue for decades and using the word "nation" would just add fuel to the fire.

    1. Re: FTFY by FuzzNugget · · Score: 1

      I think you're correct, I just grasped at the wrong word.

  132. La tribune libre by tepples · · Score: 1

    Don't they have la tribune libre (the op-ed page) in les journaux (the newspapers) in Quebec?

    1. Re:La tribune libre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure, they're all in French...

  133. Official Stats are Suspect by digitaltraveller · · Score: 1

    Most young Quebecers speak English. The official stat is 43% of Quebecers are bilingual English and French, but I have a feeling it's actually way over 50% if we are talking passable English. Certainly it will be by the time the baby boomer generation dies out. I hope this law is challenged before that tho.

  134. Re:And in other news... by Guy+Smiley · · Score: 1
    And just to point out, I live in Alberta and all three of my children, and the children of all my friends, go to French immersion schools since kindergarten, so I'm not anti-French. I also speak German.

    My point is that Quebec needs to let go of the "French Only" mantra and join the 20th^W21st century. Why should Chinese restaurants not be able to have larger Chinese writing than French? Why should KFC be renamed PFK or whatever, when they don't even want to be called "Kentucky Fried Chicken" in English anymore because "Fried" is bad for business. They should rename their company to "Kiosque Frit Canada" to have initials "KFC" :-).

    Languages evolve over time, but Quebecois has stagnated. Even the French call email "email", instead of "couriel." Even "facsimilie" (the root of the word "fax machine") is a valid French word, but the language police had to invent "telecopie" (sorry, my accent's are not happy) just to avoid polluting the language with an "English" word.

    Did the language police make up new words for "samurai" or "sushi" or "glasnost" or "naan"? No, just for English words.

  135. Re: And in other news... by w1zz4 · · Score: 1

    Wow you don't know anything about Bill 101. No company ever been force to change their name. All the bill is asking is a a french description when you use an English name (Best Buy is known in Quebec as "Best Buy Magasin d'électronique"). KFC decided to change their name in Qc to Poulet Frit Kentucky (PFK) to be more appeiling to Franch Canadians (so it's a pure capitalism reason).

  136. What's the best thing to come out of Quebec? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ---- wait for it.... Trans Canada Highway, heading west!

    1. Re:What's the best thing to come out of Quebec? by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      I dunno, that train to Halifax, NoSco is quite scenic. :-)

  137. Re: And in other news... by HungWeiLo · · Score: 1

    And those people typically live in English-speaking-only expat enclaves that they never venture out of - no different than those who claim to have visited Mexico by way of a visit to a Cancun all-inclusive resort.

    --
    There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
  138. Re: And in other news... by metrix007 · · Score: 1
    --
    If you ignore ACs because they are anonymous - you're an idiot.
  139. Dear Britain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why didn't you oust the dirty french from these shores when you defeated them on the Plains of Abraham? Or at the very least why didn't you assimilate them and not grant them any special privileges? You screwed up Canada from that day forward.

  140. Re: And in other news... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    Laden or unladen?

  141. Re: And in other news... by w1zz4 · · Score: 1

    Right from your article :
    "Its efforts, accompanied by threats of legal action and fines, to add French phrases and slogans to those trade names prompted six major American retailers to take the province to court last month."

    Which is exactly what I said, you can use your Eglish name as long as you add a description in French...

    You know you should read the article before using it to make a point...

  142. Re:My Thank You Note by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

    Thank you, Quebec... For making the product manuals on my bookshelf take up 50% extra space and consume 50% more trees.

    Thank you, France, Germany, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, the Netherlands, Spain, Portugal, Italy,... for making the product manuals in the boxed products I buy take up 1000% extra space and consume 1000% more trees. Cos, you know, here in Europe they like to make one box that they can sell anywhere.

    --
    Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
  143. Re:And in other news... by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

    Languages evolve over time, but Quebecois has stagnated. Even the French call email "email", instead of "couriel."

    They've already migrated away from this, and most people call it "mél", which is more like "mail" than "email". It also works great in email signatures, as they now typically go:
    Tél: +33 1.23.45.67
    Mél: nom@addresse.fr

    This is a good example of borrowing, because it's been nativised. The "e" bit didn't work in French, so they got rid of it. Besides, email and courriel both give precedence to mail, and email is now the norm, with paper mail being the exception. Having email no longer subservient to postal mail as a concept makes a great deal of sense.

    --
    Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
  144. Re: And in other news... by jwhitener · · Score: 1

    What happens in a community when 50+% of the inhabitants are native Spanish speakers? Still force them to use English when they are the majority?

    There is no Federal official language for the USA (is that the country you were referring to?). Each community decides how best to server its population. While some States list English as their official language, most services, like hospitals, will still support multiple languages if their community has significant diversity.

  145. Re:"It's a stupid law, I'm not going to defend it" by vux984 · · Score: 1

    ...and then you defend it

    I didn't defend the law. I defended the consistency with which the law is being applied. There is a difference.

    So . . . if I create a website which I intend to be read in Berlin, or Pamplona, or Rome . . . it still has to be in French?

    If you are located in quebec and dealing with the quebec public via the website, then there would need to be a french version of the page in addition to the others..

    If you are located in quebec and ONLY doing online sales to customers in berlin in germany in german, then i suppose technically the law might require you to have a french version of the page ... but who would ever complain if you didn't?

    Never mind the argument . . . I give up.

    Yes. Its a stupid law and should be repealed.

  146. violation of human rights, right? by superwiz · · Score: 1

    I mean if any, however local, authority in the US did the same thing to a Spanish-centered store, we'd see demonstrations. Even mentioning English-only laws is considered racism now. So Canada is openly violating human rights, right? Where are the protests around the world?

    --
    Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
  147. Ummm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not sure if you are familiar with the Quebec Separatist movement. If not.

    You may be 100% correct. Just know that they don't care. Not about you, not about your opinion, not about how practical or just the language law is. They are inward focused and have their own priorities.

    Before anyone points out that the Separatists and the language laws aren't the same thing, I know that. However the cultural mindset and historical origins of both are the same.

    In the process of correcting certain historical injustices, the Separatist movement won power, achieved everything they ever wanted (except actual political separation), and immediately overreached beyond where they should have gone in terms of policy.

    Recent gems out of Quebec:

    1). They wanted an Italian restaurant to translate the menu to French. Because, you know, the Italian names for the Italian dishes offended Quebec language sensibilities that all things must be French (officially, French must predominate);

    2). They are trying to pass a law defining acceptable Quebequois behaviour. Most controversially, all public displays of religious symbols, worn on the person, are to be banned for provincial employees. No crosses, headscarves, kirpans, yarmulkes, etc. They want to be a strictly secular society insofar as the instruments of government. Also the cross on the wall in the National Assembly is coming down.

    In the opinion of many outside of Quebec, and non-Separatists inside, these activities are designed to stir up trouble, appeal to the base, and try to keep the Separatists relevant.

  148. Re: And in other news... by metrix007 · · Score: 1

    You're arguing semantics. When the companies name is a phrase or slogan, it had to be changed.

    Do you have a source for KFC voluntarily renaming to PFK?

    I remember a story about a guy who got fined each day until he put an apostrophe in his name. Ridiculous.

    And you didn't address the rest of my post.

    --
    If you ignore ACs because they are anonymous - you're an idiot.
  149. Re:My Thank You Note by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1

    I'm talking about 150-page user manuals that get fattened into 450-page volumes. If they're really giving you 1500-page telephone books with your electronic gadgets, then I pity you. A more efficient solution would be to target the packaging to the appropriate audience.

    Another difference is that this is presumably for the benefit of just the ~3 million people in Quebec who don't know English. I suspect that the trilingual manuals have something to do with the NAFTA treaty between the US, Canada and Mexico, which covers more than 450 million people. So the 50% bloat is added for the benefit of well under 1% of the potential users.

  150. Re: And in other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tu parles comme le genre d'imbécile qui n'a jamais sorti de chez eux. But hey, you keep hatin' on people you know nothing about.

  151. Re: And in other news... by PmanAce · · Score: 1

    Nice try with google translate. First of all, you wouldn't put an accent on the last "e" of the first word.

    --
    Tired of my customary (Score:1)
  152. "Language Police"? by HalAtWork · · Score: 1

    Sounds like something crazy out of North Korea! Does anywhere else in the world have something similar to this?

  153. Culture is not something set in stone by HalAtWork · · Score: 1

    If Quebec is protecting its heritage, why don't they require everything to be in a language Native Americans understand? Because culture is a constantly evolving thing, and you can't just mandate or regulate it. Quebec needs to realize this. They sound like facists.

  154. bad fix by WebCowboy · · Score: 1

    You are wrong. Quebec is not officially recognised as a distinct society since neither the Meech Lake nor the charlottown accords were passed into law. The only parliamentary motion that did pass specifically uses the word NATION.

    1. Re:bad fix by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      Care to cite that motion?

    2. Re:bad fix by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      According to this I am correct;

      On December 11, 1995, the House of Commons adopted a resolution in which the House recognizes that “Québec is a distinct society within Canada”

  155. Re:My Thank You Note by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

    Ah, the old "there aren't as many of you, so you're less important" argument. When this is about skin colour, religion or sexual orientation, it's mostly accepted as being bigotry; but when it's about language, it's fair game, right? Cos "language is a choice". Yeah. The first thing I did upon being born was select which language my mother was to speak to me, and communicate that to her via telepathic link. By a lucky coincidence, I managed to pick the one and only language she was capable of talking to me in.

    And as for manuals, mostly they just put a "quickstart guide" in the box, and a CD-RoM with the main manuals in PDF format. No-one reads the manuals anyway. Everyone's a winner.

    --
    Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
  156. Remove the official page - recreate as 'fan' page by stiggle · · Score: 1

    Then its not "official" advertising related to the shop and so not subject to the Quebec language rules.

  157. Re: And in other news... by kbdd · · Score: 2
    I do not want to force anybody to do anything they do not want to do, but a condition for being a citizen of the USA is that you have to speak the language. It actually is the law, if that means anything. Candidates do not have to promise to never speak their native language, but they have to show that they are sufficiently proficient in English to be able to conduct business as a permanent resident or citizen, and I happen to think that it is a good law. You make your choice, if you do not want to do that, nobody is forcing you to come live here. At least that was the case when I got my green card (and later my citizenship) over 20 years ago. The interview was conducted in English, and if you could not answer the questions in English, you simply did not get a green card.

    Therefore I do not understand why those who want to become citizen (or green card holders) simply do not just do that and we let them. I actually know a lot of people who have a green card yet would fail the test I had to go through 20 years ago. I also do not agree that the government should spend taxpayer's money to develop government paperwork (intended for citizens and permanent residents) in languages other than English. Just like you have no expectation of privacy when you use electronic means to communicate, you should have no expectation that the government will develop tools and procedures in languages other than English when these tools are intended for residents and citizen.

    If the laws on the books had been reasonably enforced, and if a majority of immigrants had shown a minimum amount of respect for the country that gave them a place to live, we would not have gotten in a situation where 50%+ of the population in an area *only* speaks a language other than English in the first place. Again, I have no beef with people speaking a language other than English, even conducting business in it, I have a problem when I find myself in an area of the USA where *nobody* (or a small fraction) speaks English and I cannot conduct business (or ask for directions) in English. I realize I start to sound like a Republican and that makes me uncomfortable...

    I am an immigrant myself, but I would not have considered coming to the USA (or any other country) without having first a basic proficiency in English (or the local language) and improving it once here. I certainly would not have expected (or demanded) that the government generates instructions and forms in any language other than English, or provide a translator. I made it a point to be proficient in English and I would not have come if I had not been able to achieve that. I observe that for those who may not know English before coming here, the local college provides very inexpensive classes for "English as a Second Language" and that many people do take advantage of those, so even if you end up in the US under duress and do not speak English, there is no reason for not learning English once you are here.

    I deplore that obviously many do not have such standards or do not take advantage of these classes, but I am not sure we can fix it at this point.

    The issue with the banks or hospitals is different since no taxpayer money is involved. The issue is not that they cater to their foreign customers, what bothers me is that they do not even say "for Spanish, press 9" in English. How hard can it be for a Spanish speaking customer of a US bank to recognize the sound of "for Spanish, press 9"? This one is more of a gripe than anything, but it is the most apparent and one that I find offensive because of the pervasiveness of it where I live (north-west Florida, even though the Spanish fraction of the local population is much smaller here than in the rest of the state). I understand in other parts of the country it may be different. That is a personal thing I suppose.

  158. Re:My Thank You Note by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1

    Ah, the old "there aren't as many of you, so you're less important" argument.

    No, they must be *more* important if they deserve using 100X more resources per person than the rest of us. That makes most of us less important than them. That's racist, sexist and bigoted and not politically correct.

  159. Re: And in other news... by dolmen.fr · · Score: 1

    I obviously disagree with you. Anyway, here are some fixes to improve your knowledge of my native and beloved language:

    Dégagé, con! Les français jamais pris la peine de parler anglais, même quand ils le savent. Et ils prétendent ne pas comprendre juste pour être maladroit, enculés.

    Dégage, connard ! Les français ne prennent jamais la peine de parler anglais, même quand ils savent. Et ces enculés prétendent ne pas comprendre juste pour être malpolis. (I'm not not sure what you meant with "maladroit")

  160. Demanding only 1 language...?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DAMN Those arrogant, ignorant AMERICANS demanding everyone speak their language!

    (Yes, folks, Canada is part of America...North America...) ;)

  161. Re: And in other news... by rhazz · · Score: 1

    Also, to advance to management levels within the federal government a certain level of certified bilingualism is required. About 95% of management positions require it, regardless of whether or not your duties will require you to speak the other language to anyone. Full-time language training is provided for people who are lucky enough to get a position that will give it (i.e. they send you away for a concentrated year of learning), but that option is available less and less these days. I am not sure what the statistics on training are, but I have heard many times that the overwhelming majority of people being trained in an official language are anglophones learning french.

    Personally I started taking some french courses when my work offered them, however the only offering was a 2 hour per week course which they ended after 6 months. I stopped going after it was clear that the course's pace would never get me anywhere since the knowledge needed to be applied to retain it, and I work in an IT shop where there are only one or two french people that are not on my team (though I'd have much more luck learning chinese). People who get sent to full-time language training learn french for 8 hours a day for an entire year, and even then many often fail the test a couple times before passing. The french oral test is notoriously difficult, though oddly the english equivalent is apparently quite easy. Anyway, this is just to reiterate that many anglophones are trying to learn french - they are only doing this to advance their career because the Official Languages Act made it a requirement, but they are still trying.

    And to go off on another tangent, the Official Languages Act is a monumental waste of money, I would ballpark it as tens of billions yearly. I agree that francophones have rights, and should have those rights, but the current strategy of forcing the french language on majority english populations is an extremely inefficient use of resources at best. And I am not talking about within Quebec borders.

  162. Re:My Thank You Note by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

    Does the trade agreement state that every product must always be packaged in all three languages? I think you'll find that it doesn't, which means it's the producer's choice to package that way. It is therefore presumably in their commercial interest to do so. If it was cheaper to have 3 different packages, they would have three different packages.

    --
    Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
  163. Re:I live in Québec and those law are pretty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Result? The law has remove a sale from my local store and move that else where.

    Yes but allowing the area to be overwhelmed with English only products would hurt the lower classes mostly. I have met people in Quebec that could not speak english and they tend to be rural and poor. I usually run into them as retail workers (Couche Tard mostly and sometimes La Belle Province). Going English only would probably hurt their ability to buy things.

    What's really funny is watching a Parisian French speaker and Quebecois Couch Tard employee try and communicate as sometimes they can't understand each other. Although I have had the same experience with some Scots before.

  164. Soon... native english speaker will understand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As only a few US/UK citizens are open minded enough to understand few words from other langages.... they will really suffer when China will wake up, and every new interesting products only available in chinese... :P
    Then they will remember this thread...

  165. Re: And in other news... by Keybounce · · Score: 1

    I do not want to force anybody to do anything they do not want to do, but a condition for being a citizen of the USA is that you have to speak the language. It actually is the law, if that means anything.

    Nope.

    All you have to do is be born or naturalized in the USA, and subject to its jurisdiction.

    Unless, you are the courts: Then, you say all you have to do is be born or naturalized, and then you are subject to its jurisdiction.

    Or, if you are someone who actually paid attention to older rulings: then, all you need is for a state to consider you a citizen; once one state says you are a citizen of that state, then all states have to accept you as a citizen.

    Believe it or not, that was re-affirmed in a case from (memory ... might be off) 1999, against the state of california, for trying to make new arrivals to the state get less welfare support from california.

    I think the quote was something like, "Citizens of the united states, whether rich or poor, have the right to choose their own state; states do not have the right to reject citizens".

    The issue of being a citizen of a state or not actually dates back to old court rulings that had to deal with someone that was born, and lived entirely in Washington DC, and had never lived in any state. Prior to the 14th amendment, being a citizen or not was entirely up to the states to declare; some gave that to blacks, and others did not.

    It is my understanding that the _early_ supreme court rulings after the 14th amendment actually made this clear: states still could issue citizenship, and if they did not, you could claim citizenship from the central government, and then get all the federal rights in state courts.

    Don't ask me when the courts started messing up -- I don't know.
    But now, it's more "If you are born here, then you are automatically subject to federal jurisdiction, and the restrictions of article 1 no longer apply".

  166. Re: And in other news... by kbdd · · Score: 1
    "a condition for being a citizen of the USA is that you have to speak the language" was what I said, not what I meant :)

    I meant: "a condition for becoming a permanent resident or a citizen (by naturalization) is that you speak the language". That is part of the regulations that used to be applied by the INS. I suppose the courts probably can decide to make you a citizen without the involvement of the INS, but that is not to my point. The majority of immigrants have to go through the INS.

    Thank you for catching this. The rest of your post is informative (thank you, I did not know:), but only tangentially to my point.

    It is only one of the differences naturalized Americans have compared to naturally born Americans.

  167. Re:Soon... native english speaker will understand. by SJHillman · · Score: 1

    Interestingly, the US has no official language and, according to Wikipedia, has well over 300 spoken/signed languages in general use. Of course, 80% of the population are native English speakers but it still has the fifth largest Spanish-speaking population in the world. However, 20% of the roughly 300 million people in the US means some 60 million people have a native language other than English... in other words, the US contains a population nearly equal to the UK that does not speak English as a primary language. No word on how Americans speak Klingon natively, but they're not expected to have children to pass it on to.

  168. Quebec behavior by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    jeez now Quebec is behaving like the US of A sticking their nose up everybodys ass

  169. Its not even real modern French by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yup its messed up OK.
    The simple fact that they don't speak modern french in that province but a "bastardised" and "ancient" variety of french that many "REAL" french people cannot understand fully speaks volumes.
    Sure have your shop in dual language but Facebook ? WTH !

    Most CNC machines come with language options including French and many times I have set the language to French at the request of a client only to be called back a short while later to change them from "REAL French" to "English" just so they can operate them in that province. that's how messed up the French language is in Canada.

    Let them keep that Province and form their own government but also cut ALL other money, taxes, grants, subsidies etc,etc. from the rest of Canada and lets see how long they last.

  170. Re: And in other news... by yenic · · Score: 1

    shut the fuck up asshole. we all know english people won't make any efforts to learn french even if the live in france directly.

    I am Canadian, I live in Ontario, I am an anglophone, and I went to french immersion school for 4 years, with about 90 other students in my class, and studied with Rosetta Stone for two, but I live in an almost exclusively english area.

    I can read french pretty well, but I can't really speak it well due to lack of practice. So anyways, english people do make efforts to learn french. It's usually the French people who put us off of it with attitudes like yours.

    Which is why most of us learn Spanish instead. Yo siempre quiero hacer en un otra idioma. There's no attitude from the worldwide hispanic culture when you make a mistake. Very welcoming, very friendly culture that I embraced because it embraced me. I've worked for French companies, and I've lived in France for 6 months (Lille). I like French, and France is my favorite country in the world.

    I speak a little French, enough to function there, but overall I chose to abandon them and their language in favor of Spanish. It's a better language anyway from an orthographical standpoint. I have friends in France, but they do have one of the largest shares of twits per capita.

    --
    http://www.accountkiller.com/en/delete-slashdot-account Stop visiting Slashdot.
  171. Tell the OLF to go F themselves. by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

    Bill 22 was written and allowed to persist when the French language was threatened. It is not threatened by we English who live here, but by the exodos of Francophones who move to other provinces.
    And the French are racest and biggoted. There is a proposed legislation to baan Hijabs, Kippas, Turbins and perhaps visible religious symbols (large crosses) for all public servants.
    Quebec lost 12000 net net population last year. Mostly francophones who found better living conditions elsewhere.

    I won't relocate because I am a grandfather, and my grandchildren are in school in Montreal. Were my own kids portable, I would strongly advise them to leave the province. Discrimination is at an all time high.

    There are two population groups that are leaving, the well educated who are engineers, doctors, nurses, lawyers, whose training was in English, but can't pass the French test at 90% level, and the unemployed. Both for opportunities elsewhere.

    The result of this outward migration is that the tax base is being eroded. Quebec will not be able to ever clear their tax deficit. Shame..

    Its too bad, as I get to my mid to late 70's I will be one of the bilingual English who will remain to close the lights.

    LS in Montreal
    PS.
    French will definitely disappear from North America. It will take about 250 years, perhaps less. My reasons for so say are as follows:

    There are 50 million Latinos in the USA and a very large number in Canada. There are more Spanish speaking in North America than the 6 million 2nd generation French.

    The internet is in English. Business in North America, and mostly in the world is in English.

    There are 350 million Spanish in Latin and Central America, by all rights, the second language of Canada should be the modern Spanish.
    Is it worth doing business for 6 million citizens for a population that is ageing? Six million population is not 6 million consumers.

    In closing, the French extremists, instead of encouraging an adoption by offering incentives, are using the whip. Don't like it here, then get out.

     

    --
    Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
  172. Re: And in other news... by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

    As an immigrant who started learning English in school, I have no objection to anyone using the language of their choice for whatever private purpose they want to.
    However, I have an issue with the government (local, state or federal) spending taxpayer's money to make government services available in languages other than English. It seems to be common courtesy that if you want to move in and live in a country, you learn the local language as a courtesy to the locals you are invading as a mark of respect.

    Similarly, I am very offended when I call a bank or any other local business and the first thin I am asked is if I speak Spanish, to press '9'.

    Now, I also recognize that "speaking English" is not a strict definition. Many natives don't do that very well.

    I love languages, and while I was born and raised in English, my wife is from a Spanish speaking family. What a thrill it was to learn and understand a second language, the music and other culture.
    The family moved to Quebec, because of the similarity to Spanish. I moved to Quebec because of my wife's aged parents.
    I love speaking and writing French, my second best language. But, I do not like the fact that a) I cannot post in English, I cannot have a bilingual sign unless the French is prominent, and there are biggots and racists amongst the good people who just make living in Quebec a hell hole of racism and prejudice. The French justify these actions on the basis of "protecting the Quebec French".

    --
    Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
  173. Re: And in other news... by jwhitener · · Score: 1

    http://www.uscis.gov/sites/default/files/files/nativedocuments/M-618.pdf

    I don't know if things changed or not, but currently there is no requirement to speak or write english to immigrate to the US.

  174. Re: And in other news... by kbdd · · Score: 1
    It seems you are correct, I came across this (PBS web site):

    "Under current law, only applicants for U.S. citizenship, not those applying for green cards, must prove English proficiency."

    http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb...

    Maybe I was confused. I was pretty certain that I had to pass a proficiency test when I applied for a green card 25 years ago, but maybe it was for the citizenship, or maybe the law changed since then, or maybe it was just a policy of the US Immigration Services at the time.

    Apparently English proficiency was a provision to the ill-fated immigration reform bill that was put together by a bi-partisan group last year. In my opinion, that would be a good thing. US born kids have to go to school (or be home-schooled) and therefore have to possess at least a minimum of English proficiency by the time they turn 18 (I will readily admit that in some cases it is really minimum.) I see little reason for not asking the same from immigrants.

  175. 'cusIknowyoucare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The situation is resolved, OQLF dropped the case!

    http://www.ottawacitizen.com/technology/Language+police+drop+attack+Chelsea+boutique+owner/9574668/story.html