Why is that a problem? We (in the US) would have more money for healthcare and education subsidies if we stopped mass-incarceration, enforcement of victimless crimes, and military thuggery in countries we have no business intervening in.
The US needs MORE access to healthcare, not more rationing via economic means.
You can still save locally, in Documents or other directories. You'll likely also be able to turn this misbehavior off. This only applies to ~user\Onedrive.
Fortunately, you can still save locally, in Documents, at least for now. There should also be a way to sync all OneDrive files and turn off this overbearing behavior.
Just because you didn't use a file recently doesn't mean it's less important, and it wouldn't be nice to find out it was deleted when you're doing a presentation somewhere with poor Internet access...
That sounds like what most police departments would do with a stolen car.
As far as assault, if there's a mutual fight and no one gets seriously hurt, I'd rather not pay to jail the combatants. Many states have a "mutual combat" exception to assault laws.
You pay either way. Should pedestrians and public transit riders be forced to pay taxes for large freeways?
A well-designed public transit system, ESPECIALLY if combined with a ZipCar or self-driving shuttle car system can also take people where they want to go, while actually being more comfortable and environmentally sound than long personal car trips.
40s, 50s, and 60s mechanical fuel injection systems are different beasts from O2-sensor and airflow-controlled feedback EFI systems. The latter only came into their own after emissions regulations virtually mandated them. Efficient, clean, easier to fix, and actually simpler than carbs.
Key words: DOMESTIC OUT-MIGRATION. Foreign immigration (legal and otherwise) more than makes up for it. The coastal states have always been gateways for immigrants, nothing new here.
Compare a fuel injected 1986 car to a carbed 1968 car and you'll see a hell of a difference. 1980 was actually when car emissions tech started getting good (electronic fuel injection systems like Bosch L-Jetronic and Motronic got good enough for daily driving).
The good is electrically-powered transportation between major cities without environmentally nasty batteries. Trains have a huge advantage over other modes of transport, in that they can reliably pick up electrical power while in motion.
The ideal situation would be a NETWORK of electric trains for medium-distance travel with self-driving electric point-to-point shuttles for local travel.
Hyperloop or Loop would also work, but a regular train comes without the engineering problems of digging a few-hundred-mile tunnel or building a few-hundred-mile tube that's kept in a semi-vacuum.
As far as paying for toys, better than paying for endless wars in the Middle East to support parasite states over there.
Problem is that the current cost accounting system doesn't take long-term environmental costs into effect. Under an accounting system that takes future costs of mitigating global warming or dealing with its effects into account, nuclear power plants may well be profitable, or (anyway) less loss-creating than other types of energy.
"Paying for itself" isn't the point of a public utility or public service -- it's to provide a public good, even if the sacred tax dollar has to be spent. Lots of things don't technically "pay for themselves", but are useful to the public.
"Sardine can" is in itself an emotional statement. But yes, I'm emotional. I love trains, so much that I want to cut, run, and spend the rest of my life in Europe and Asia so I can ride nice ones:D
Dose makes the poison. Oxygen is needed for life. 100% or even 50% oxygen atmospheres tend to damage lung tissue, corrode things, and make things burn spectacularly. Water is also needed for life. Try breathing 100% water.
Homeostasis depends on stuff staying in a fairly narrow range to sustain life.
Mod parent up -- a poster who gets it. Except the 4x4 truck. If I can't have an electric car powered with nuclear power, I'd rather sip fuel in an Insight, Prius, or on a Vespa.
My point is that neither left and right has anything other than emotion behind their ideas. Trains are great when they're electrically powered. No environmentally costly batteries required, and you can get up and take a piss. Yet you carp about being stuck in a sardine can with smelly people yaddadee, bladadee, blah.
Slashdot Mirror
Spoken like a true brainwashed idiot who buys Fox News agitprop. Hook. Line. Sinker.
Why is that a problem? We (in the US) would have more money for healthcare and education subsidies if we stopped mass-incarceration, enforcement of victimless crimes, and military thuggery in countries we have no business intervening in.
The US needs MORE access to healthcare, not more rationing via economic means.
If you don't want C*ntana deciding for you, just save the files locally, not in your ~User\OneDrive folder.
Windows 10 is annoying, but you can still choose not to save to OneDrive at all. OneDrive is basically a single folder under the main user folder.
You can still save locally, in Documents or other directories. You'll likely also be able to turn this misbehavior off. This only applies to ~user\Onedrive.
Fortunately, you can still save locally, in Documents, at least for now. There should also be a way to sync all OneDrive files and turn off this overbearing behavior.
Just because you didn't use a file recently doesn't mean it's less important, and it wouldn't be nice to find out it was deleted when you're doing a presentation somewhere with poor Internet access...
Time for the public to start paying for the true costs of their energy use to Gaia.
That sounds like what most police departments would do with a stolen car.
As far as assault, if there's a mutual fight and no one gets seriously hurt, I'd rather not pay to jail the combatants. Many states have a "mutual combat" exception to assault laws.
Only about 50% of road spending is covered by gas taxes and tolls.
You pay either way. Should pedestrians and public transit riders be forced to pay taxes for large freeways?
A well-designed public transit system, ESPECIALLY if combined with a ZipCar or self-driving shuttle car system can also take people where they want to go, while actually being more comfortable and environmentally sound than long personal car trips.
40s, 50s, and 60s mechanical fuel injection systems are different beasts from O2-sensor and airflow-controlled feedback EFI systems. The latter only came into their own after emissions regulations virtually mandated them. Efficient, clean, easier to fix, and actually simpler than carbs.
It depends -- the government may want to create jobs repairing, designing, and building the robots locally.
Key words: DOMESTIC OUT-MIGRATION. Foreign immigration (legal and otherwise) more than makes up for it. The coastal states have always been gateways for immigrants, nothing new here.
Compare a fuel injected 1986 car to a carbed 1968 car and you'll see a hell of a difference. 1980 was actually when car emissions tech started getting good (electronic fuel injection systems like Bosch L-Jetronic and Motronic got good enough for daily driving).
The good is electrically-powered transportation between major cities without environmentally nasty batteries. Trains have a huge advantage over other modes of transport, in that they can reliably pick up electrical power while in motion.
The ideal situation would be a NETWORK of electric trains for medium-distance travel with self-driving electric point-to-point shuttles for local travel.
Hyperloop or Loop would also work, but a regular train comes without the engineering problems of digging a few-hundred-mile tunnel or building a few-hundred-mile tube that's kept in a semi-vacuum.
As far as paying for toys, better than paying for endless wars in the Middle East to support parasite states over there.
Problem is that the current cost accounting system doesn't take long-term environmental costs into effect. Under an accounting system that takes future costs of mitigating global warming or dealing with its effects into account, nuclear power plants may well be profitable, or (anyway) less loss-creating than other types of energy.
Solution: heavy levels of automation, and protective trade restrictions. Robots might end up being even cheaper than Chinese or Indian workers.
"Paying for itself" isn't the point of a public utility or public service -- it's to provide a public good, even if the sacred tax dollar has to be spent. Lots of things don't technically "pay for themselves", but are useful to the public. "Sardine can" is in itself an emotional statement. But yes, I'm emotional. I love trains, so much that I want to cut, run, and spend the rest of my life in Europe and Asia so I can ride nice ones :D
Dose makes the poison. Oxygen is needed for life. 100% or even 50% oxygen atmospheres tend to damage lung tissue, corrode things, and make things burn spectacularly. Water is also needed for life. Try breathing 100% water. Homeostasis depends on stuff staying in a fairly narrow range to sustain life.
Wait for the next dump -- economy's due for an enema soon if history is any guide.
If it weren't for California smog rules in the 60s and 70s, we'd still be driving carburetor cars that make 15 mpg.
Mod parent up -- a poster who gets it. Except the 4x4 truck. If I can't have an electric car powered with nuclear power, I'd rather sip fuel in an Insight, Prius, or on a Vespa.
I'll just step over the poop. At least it keeps more Midwestern/suburban milquetoasts from moving into the city and raising prices further.
My point is that neither left and right has anything other than emotion behind their ideas. Trains are great when they're electrically powered. No environmentally costly batteries required, and you can get up and take a piss. Yet you carp about being stuck in a sardine can with smelly people yaddadee, bladadee, blah.
Raw emotion and bad socialization sounds more like the religious right, which takes orders from an imaginary fairy in the sky.