The feet are unpowered polymer pads covered with spikes, essentially. That doesn't require power to maintain the grip.
Moving, as you no doubt noticed, requires that the pads be peeled backwards. Thousands of microscopic spikes provide tremendous traction, but it isn't going to impact tyres that much (yet). Perhaps climbing apparatus will see this material soon.
This is especially true with the increasing rates of classified material being generated. The Department of Agriculture's classified documents probably aren't a threat to national security, for instance. The CIA, on the other hand, has to catalog classified documents, so its most sensitive documents will be undocumented.
As long as you have the myth that anyone can be well off if they work hard enough, Americans will keep sucking it up. Once poverty is a source of guilt, you can control the poor; and if you're the rich, you can increase the poverty gap as much as you like.
Of course! But look at Egypt--they've been in a state of emergency for twenty-five years so far (according to al Jazeera). The elections have all been single-party affairs.
Here, the day they close the polls, I'm getting a rifle out and heading down to DC. But why would the government do that? The current two-party system works quite well for most businesses, regardless of which is in power.
As for the original issue, English is odd, and English speakers usually forgiving; we can understand the sentence, even if the literal meaning is a bit off, and it's grammatical, so few people bother to complain.
In thirty years, this might be a regular feature of the language.
So would the distraction be more of a benefit to new programmers? I think class browsers would be quite helpful when learning a language, as well as autocompletion; but if you actually have to go through some effort to get any information you've forgotten, it might encourage you to memorize it sooner.
Regardless, I find it awkward to use an IDE. I'd at most give each method one lecture, then tell the kids to use whichever they prefer and go to office hours for additional help.
So the Linuxes that actually include Sun's Java in their package repositories will have to have alternative JREs/compilers be listed as blocking Sun's Java and vice versa. Moreover, they should be prepared to return to manual downloading requirements at a moment's notice.
I don't see an issue, as long as the maintainers are well aware of the issues.
By better support, you mean a better runtime engine?
Though logically, they could make sure that theirs was the best, taking all the features and optimizations from the OSS implementations and incorporating them using their full-time paid workers. The question is whether it's any benefit to them to have the best Java tools at the cost of open sourcing them (and losing licensing fees).
Isn't that the case in most of the US? You have to be of a certain age, no doubt, but my brother got a 22 rifle when he was twelve. And that in New York.
Of course, this doesn't apply if each application is relatively small and irreducible--you just use Java for the next product that's commissioned and go from there.
You'll still lose initial productivity from learning the new language, but it won't cost a complete code library if that library doesn't exist. And if the next product happens to be similar enough to a previous one that you could rework the old one easily, you could still use C++ on it, since the developers are experienced in both.
Agreed. You might see benefits if you start using a language that interfaces well with C++, though--perhaps Python? That would allow you to keep your existing work and continue using C++ while exploring more platform-independent and possibly quicker systems for development.
Switching suddenly to Java, though, is a bad idea if you don't already have the expertise.
"Look at those Ukrainians, they're so corrupt that the prime minister--" "Dubya?" "I hate you." "At least we're not stupid enough to elect an ape for President." "No, but we weren't smart enough to object when he smashed all the ballots." "You'd think someone would have done something." "You would, wouldn't you."
Thus, Americans have no right to complain about any other nation.
Not only fault tolerant but fast. I don't want to fly a plane that's experiencing lag and turbulence at the same time.
And not only fast, but reliably fast. If there *is* lag, the pilot shouldn't have to guess and hope that it'll be a particular delay. And there should be the same lag for every system.
There probably aren't any power savings, and it almost certainly costs a fair bit more--and still will even if the elements were produced in equal abundance--so the only benefit I really see is that you can still move the elevators when the plane's breaking into pieces.
Hm. I just downloaded Equilibrium, the soundtrack to Bored of the Rings, and a group of four thousand ebooks, and they're all missing. Do I have a virus? I must have misplaced the files.
OR
Hm. All my files are intact and my computer's running okay, and I'm not getting any alerts from my virus scanner. Do I have a virus?
Recall that this virus, like many, disables antivirus software.
Of course, we could rebel. We tend not to do that until people we know have been injured publicly, or at least people nearby. Also, we tend not to do that unless we are reasonably certain that we'll be able to do something worthwhile before we're likely to die, and that death is less likely with rebellion.
So, the words "bat's chance in hell" spring to mind. Not until it's dangerous to walk the streets, and then only if the propaganda corps slips.
On the other hand, Tanenbaum admits that you need more complex algorithms with microkernels. You might have ended up with a smaller pool of kernel hackers, retarding the progress of Linux.
So let's create another world and train it up the same way, but have Minix be GPL'd from the start. Then we can say how it would have turned out.
If it's shared memory that I pass to the kernel, and I have an application that doesn't parallelize well, then I'm sending pages off to the kernel quite often. That means the kernel uses a lot of memory.
There are two options: the kernel could combine pages, either physically or logically; or the kernel could leave that page open for writing by the application in question.
The easiest way would be for each application to have a page or set of pages for sending messages to the kernel; the application would view the space as an eternally long section of write-once memory. When the kernel was done with the beginning of the shared page, the application could start writing to the beginning.
Also, don't we usually get buffered sockets? That way, I can send a megabyte to another process that's not currently listening, and continue on with my business before it even bothers to read. So we don't really have a problem, except buffer overflows (which are probably realized by overwriting the buffer).
Slashdot Mirror
The feet are unpowered polymer pads covered with spikes, essentially. That doesn't require power to maintain the grip.
Moving, as you no doubt noticed, requires that the pads be peeled backwards. Thousands of microscopic spikes provide tremendous traction, but it isn't going to impact tyres that much (yet). Perhaps climbing apparatus will see this material soon.
They've started DRMing them so that you can't rip them and, if you're using Windows, you get a free rootkit.
They have something similar for Macs, but unfortunately, it doesn't run on Linux.
This is especially true with the increasing rates of classified material being generated. The Department of Agriculture's classified documents probably aren't a threat to national security, for instance. The CIA, on the other hand, has to catalog classified documents, so its most sensitive documents will be undocumented.
As long as you have the myth that anyone can be well off if they work hard enough, Americans will keep sucking it up. Once poverty is a source of guilt, you can control the poor; and if you're the rich, you can increase the poverty gap as much as you like.
Of course! But look at Egypt--they've been in a state of emergency for twenty-five years so far (according to al Jazeera). The elections have all been single-party affairs.
Here, the day they close the polls, I'm getting a rifle out and heading down to DC. But why would the government do that? The current two-party system works quite well for most businesses, regardless of which is in power.
Not to mention fonts. I can never forgive anyone for using Comic Sans in a presentation.
Semantic error.
And it's 'grammatically', not 'grammarically'.
As for the original issue, English is odd, and English speakers usually forgiving; we can understand the sentence, even if the literal meaning is a bit off, and it's grammatical, so few people bother to complain.
In thirty years, this might be a regular feature of the language.
So would the distraction be more of a benefit to new programmers? I think class browsers would be quite helpful when learning a language, as well as autocompletion; but if you actually have to go through some effort to get any information you've forgotten, it might encourage you to memorize it sooner.
Regardless, I find it awkward to use an IDE. I'd at most give each method one lecture, then tell the kids to use whichever they prefer and go to office hours for additional help.
Even at 300,000km, you'd get a full second of lag. Do you want your doctor to lag that much?
Or do the aliens control the surgeons using tachyons? Though that doesn't help asymptotically. (I'd like a log log(n) travelling algorithm, though.)
So the Linuxes that actually include Sun's Java in their package repositories will have to have alternative JREs/compilers be listed as blocking Sun's Java and vice versa. Moreover, they should be prepared to return to manual downloading requirements at a moment's notice.
I don't see an issue, as long as the maintainers are well aware of the issues.
By better support, you mean a better runtime engine?
Though logically, they could make sure that theirs was the best, taking all the features and optimizations from the OSS implementations and incorporating them using their full-time paid workers. The question is whether it's any benefit to them to have the best Java tools at the cost of open sourcing them (and losing licensing fees).
Which JRE did you run on that hundred milliHertz processor?
Significantly faster than half the speed of C, the grandparent meant. That could be 65% or 75% the speed of C.
Isn't that the case in most of the US? You have to be of a certain age, no doubt, but my brother got a 22 rifle when he was twelve. And that in New York.
Of course, this doesn't apply if each application is relatively small and irreducible--you just use Java for the next product that's commissioned and go from there.
You'll still lose initial productivity from learning the new language, but it won't cost a complete code library if that library doesn't exist. And if the next product happens to be similar enough to a previous one that you could rework the old one easily, you could still use C++ on it, since the developers are experienced in both.
Agreed. You might see benefits if you start using a language that interfaces well with C++, though--perhaps Python? That would allow you to keep your existing work and continue using C++ while exploring more platform-independent and possibly quicker systems for development.
Switching suddenly to Java, though, is a bad idea if you don't already have the expertise.
That's what the LGPL is for.
Two Americans are talking.
"Look at those Ukrainians, they're so corrupt that the prime minister--"
"Dubya?"
"I hate you."
"At least we're not stupid enough to elect an ape for President."
"No, but we weren't smart enough to object when he smashed all the ballots."
"You'd think someone would have done something."
"You would, wouldn't you."
Thus, Americans have no right to complain about any other nation.
Not only fault tolerant but fast. I don't want to fly a plane that's experiencing lag and turbulence at the same time.
And not only fast, but reliably fast. If there *is* lag, the pilot shouldn't have to guess and hope that it'll be a particular delay. And there should be the same lag for every system.
There probably aren't any power savings, and it almost certainly costs a fair bit more--and still will even if the elements were produced in equal abundance--so the only benefit I really see is that you can still move the elevators when the plane's breaking into pieces.
Yeah, but you have to use AALib to view it :(
Hm. I just downloaded Equilibrium, the soundtrack to Bored of the Rings, and a group of four thousand ebooks, and they're all missing. Do I have a virus? I must have misplaced the files.
OR
Hm. All my files are intact and my computer's running okay, and I'm not getting any alerts from my virus scanner. Do I have a virus?
Recall that this virus, like many, disables antivirus software.
Of course, we could rebel. We tend not to do that until people we know have been injured publicly, or at least people nearby. Also, we tend not to do that unless we are reasonably certain that we'll be able to do something worthwhile before we're likely to die, and that death is less likely with rebellion.
So, the words "bat's chance in hell" spring to mind. Not until it's dangerous to walk the streets, and then only if the propaganda corps slips.
On the other hand, Tanenbaum admits that you need more complex algorithms with microkernels. You might have ended up with a smaller pool of kernel hackers, retarding the progress of Linux.
So let's create another world and train it up the same way, but have Minix be GPL'd from the start. Then we can say how it would have turned out.
If it's shared memory that I pass to the kernel, and I have an application that doesn't parallelize well, then I'm sending pages off to the kernel quite often. That means the kernel uses a lot of memory.
There are two options: the kernel could combine pages, either physically or logically; or the kernel could leave that page open for writing by the application in question.
The easiest way would be for each application to have a page or set of pages for sending messages to the kernel; the application would view the space as an eternally long section of write-once memory. When the kernel was done with the beginning of the shared page, the application could start writing to the beginning.
Also, don't we usually get buffered sockets? That way, I can send a megabyte to another process that's not currently listening, and continue on with my business before it even bothers to read. So we don't really have a problem, except buffer overflows (which are probably realized by overwriting the buffer).
It's 'Allahu akbar', you insensitive clod!