As if the facts that they use LLC in their name, that their headquaters are in a swamp, and that they're using human beings as mindless drones wasn't enough, it also appears that they made their website in Dreamweaver.
I'm curious as to whether there's a counter-patent for the open source world, or how much you can specify the limits on a patent you create. Something like a GPL patent would be excellent. GPL software could use the patented idea free of charge, but it couldn't be used in proprietary software. (More than just the code, the very idea)
Well I'm sorry, I guess "server-push" was the wrong terminology. I was trying to say that if they made an IM protocol, the server would know when you receive a new email, and be able to send a signal via your already open IM socket, in much the same way our favorite monopolizing corporation does it. q:
Of course the whole idea could be worked around if Google created an instant messaging protocol, they could make it a server-push instead of client-pull action.
I go out of my way to make sure every site I design is XHTML 1.1 compliant, and the CSS validates. I live the w3c's validators. Great things, they are.
Slashdot Mirror
Give Arch Linux a try. pacman is excellent. The install is a little complicated for some, but the package management afterwards is beautiful.
Love your .sig
It was modded "Informative" or "Insightful" before. Hence the complaining.
I checked them out, he lies. Mod him down or whatever you want.
As if the facts that they use LLC in their name, that their headquaters are in a swamp, and that they're using human beings as mindless drones wasn't enough, it also appears that they made their website in Dreamweaver.
I'm curious as to whether there's a counter-patent for the open source world, or how much you can specify the limits on a patent you create. Something like a GPL patent would be excellent. GPL software could use the patented idea free of charge, but it couldn't be used in proprietary software. (More than just the code, the very idea)
I guess I'll correct myself before someone else does. 0000 to 0002.
Which is too bad for the people with a PIN of 1111..1113
Well I'm sorry, I guess "server-push" was the wrong terminology. I was trying to say that if they made an IM protocol, the server would know when you receive a new email, and be able to send a signal via your already open IM socket, in much the same way our favorite monopolizing corporation does it. q:
Of course the whole idea could be worked around if Google created an instant messaging protocol, they could make it a server-push instead of client-pull action.
"live the" should be "live on the". Why do I always do that?
I go out of my way to make sure every site I design is XHTML 1.1 compliant, and the CSS validates. I live the w3c's validators. Great things, they are.
No. Please no. This is a mockery. Don't let it happen. I'm thoroughly DISGUSTED.