Meh, corporations pay for politicians. They pay for the school system to tell kids they'll go to Hell for copying 1's and 0's and they essentially own the police. The only way there'd be a restriction on this stuff is if the corporations didn't approve of their own actions.
Apparently, the problem is the guy who made the Bittorrent scheme. In a great bit of irony, he's one of those people who thinks it's good that corporations use the internet to extort money from anyone they can get their hands on. He made no attempt at network privacy, and really should follow through on his own twisted morality by throwing himself in prison.
But you probably know that stuff already. Seems like an encrypted torrent method would mean another program and format. It'd have to get its foot in the door, but hey I'm sure it would catch on.
Frankly, they were the Microsoft before Microsoft existed. MS is on top of the world because they lock the industry to comply with their appalling incompetence, you can't expect that Apple will fail by locking the industry to their far less incompetent machines.
Then we'd get a bunch of illegal immigrants fleeing from tortured to death by churches. Does that sound fun?
Though I think we in the non-confederate areas would agree the US would be happier if Texas and everything that comes from there were sent adrift in the ocean.
In other news, Bin Laden has decided that some Americans are only 80% immoral and only deserve to die a quick, semi-painless death. This will do good for women who leave their foreheads uncovered and kids who's souls have been doomed to Hell for eternity after seeing arrays of pixels on tv screens that may resemble blood or forbidden satanic evil sacrilegious body parts, as these people would have otherwise been executed in an excruciating manner for their sins.
This will allow the government to imprison and fine people who have nothing to do with a crime, so I'm willing to bet it'll pass. Plus, this way parents can keep beating their kids and banning their games and rest assured that someone else is taking the fall.
Well this proves you don't know what evidence is. I said that for a reason, you know. Your idea of evidence is anything that proves a belief you hold. Doesn't work that way.
So, try to keep your claims out of conversations when you know they'll be swiftly debunked.
Insulted by the fact that you don't know what evidence is? This is like when a doctor tells someone they're overweight and they become offended. What am I supposed to do about your disorders?
Till that's out of the way, try not to rave so wildly about your nihilist beliefs and calling it science. Sometimes it's fine to think the way one's mom and dad said to, but we really have no room for zealots in the scientific community.
As I said to Alsee, showing evidence to someone who doesn't know what it is is pointless. You'll just have to get a sense of logic and start figuring things out on your own one of these days.
I really can't talk evidence with someone who doesn't know what it is. That's like talking computer chips with a football player. Go play with blocks or something.
How about 'no'. Fucking with a web page to make it IE compatible is like putting a handicap ramp on a building. Sure, it's something to consider, but tending to a bunch of retards is second priority.
Web programmers don't have to put up with IE and we're not going to have to put up with Longhorn's stuff either. If IE users don't like it when a webpage isn't dumbed down for for a stone-age browser, then maybe that means it's time for Firefox.
I'm wondering how many people actually believe this stuff. Life could form out of anything in the right conditions.
Kind of a tangent, but just look at the capabilities of our souls: Can move at what seems like instantaneous speed, can survive in space, and so on and so forth. Very suspicious that we're based on something capable of rapid speed and space travel, really. Am I the only person who's intrigued by this?
I would think the most ideal place for the most widespread life form in the cosmos would be in the chaos of a star somewhere. That's just my theory; it's not based on much.
It'd be good to prevent people from teaching theories as facts. My school wreaked of teachers telling kids to believe this and that with nothing to go on but the teacher's own beliefs. Do you know how many schools are enforcing evolutionism?
Slashdot Mirror
You whine and bitch about people doing things without getting their life savings stolen by a corporation, and you say it on a free message board?
Hey next let's complain that people can step outside their doors without getting shot, blah blah, moan, complain, I shouldn't be killed insult instult
Meh, corporations pay for politicians. They pay for the school system to tell kids they'll go to Hell for copying 1's and 0's and they essentially own the police. The only way there'd be a restriction on this stuff is if the corporations didn't approve of their own actions.
Apparently, the problem is the guy who made the Bittorrent scheme. In a great bit of irony, he's one of those people who thinks it's good that corporations use the internet to extort money from anyone they can get their hands on. He made no attempt at network privacy, and really should follow through on his own twisted morality by throwing himself in prison.
But you probably know that stuff already.
Seems like an encrypted torrent method would mean another program and format. It'd have to get its foot in the door, but hey I'm sure it would catch on.
Now for a long and pointless debate over whether it should be called a star or a moon.
Frankly, they were the Microsoft before Microsoft existed. MS is on top of the world because they lock the industry to comply with their appalling incompetence, you can't expect that Apple will fail by locking the industry to their far less incompetent machines.
Then we'd get a bunch of illegal immigrants fleeing from tortured to death by churches. Does that sound fun?
Though I think we in the non-confederate areas would agree the US would be happier if Texas and everything that comes from there were sent adrift in the ocean.
Parent's responsibility to keep kids locked up? Shifting the problem so non-government people will cause it is going to help, how?
Methinks SomeGuyNamedMike had a lot of trouble learning the language.
In other news, Bin Laden has decided that some Americans are only 80% immoral and only deserve to die a quick, semi-painless death. This will do good for women who leave their foreheads uncovered and kids who's souls have been doomed to Hell for eternity after seeing arrays of pixels on tv screens that may resemble blood or forbidden satanic evil sacrilegious body parts, as these people would have otherwise been executed in an excruciating manner for their sins.
And now here's Tim with the weather.
This will allow the government to imprison and fine people who have nothing to do with a crime, so I'm willing to bet it'll pass. Plus, this way parents can keep beating their kids and banning their games and rest assured that someone else is taking the fall.
Well this proves you don't know what evidence is. I said that for a reason, you know. Your idea of evidence is anything that proves a belief you hold. Doesn't work that way.
So, try to keep your claims out of conversations when you know they'll be swiftly debunked.
Weeee!
Insulted by the fact that you don't know what evidence is? This is like when a doctor tells someone they're overweight and they become offended. What am I supposed to do about your disorders?
Till that's out of the way, try not to rave so wildly about your nihilist beliefs and calling it science. Sometimes it's fine to think the way one's mom and dad said to, but we really have no room for zealots in the scientific community.
Oh and on top of that, I get a typo.
Y'know if these shows were pirated, the networks wouldn't still have them.
Apparently, a still image disappears when it's shaken, so until that's fixed handhelds won't be much of a prospect.
It kind of annoys me too, but Slashdot is a tech site instead of a sales site. They bring up developments as they go; not always when they're done.
There are theories explaining gravity, but yeah the occurrence is a law. You can prove it just by not floating.
lol, I just metamoderated the idiot
As I said to Alsee, showing evidence to someone who doesn't know what it is is pointless. You'll just have to get a sense of logic and start figuring things out on your own one of these days.
I really can't talk evidence with someone who doesn't know what it is. That's like talking computer chips with a football player. Go play with blocks or something.
How about 'no'.
Fucking with a web page to make it IE compatible is like putting a handicap ramp on a building. Sure, it's something to consider, but tending to a bunch of retards is second priority.
Web programmers don't have to put up with IE and we're not going to have to put up with Longhorn's stuff either. If IE users don't like it when a webpage isn't dumbed down for for a stone-age browser, then maybe that means it's time for Firefox.
lol, not knowing what evidence is just means the subject is beyond your scope.
I'm wondering how many people actually believe this stuff. Life could form out of anything in the right conditions.
Kind of a tangent, but just look at the capabilities of our souls: Can move at what seems like instantaneous speed, can survive in space, and so on and so forth. Very suspicious that we're based on something capable of rapid speed and space travel, really. Am I the only person who's intrigued by this?
I would think the most ideal place for the most widespread life form in the cosmos would be in the chaos of a star somewhere. That's just my theory; it's not based on much.
Ah, well, keep your slaves stupid and they won't revolt.
It'd be good to prevent people from teaching theories as facts. My school wreaked of teachers telling kids to believe this and that with nothing to go on but the teacher's own beliefs. Do you know how many schools are enforcing evolutionism?